DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Atmospheric Dynamics Chapter 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Atmospheric Dynamics Chapter 1 Introduction to Atmospheric Dynamics Chapter 1 Paul A. Ullrich [email protected] Part 3: The Continuity Equation Question: What are the basic physical principles that govern the atmosphere? Conservation of Mass: Mass is not created nor destroyed. The total mass of the atmosphere is (to a very close approximation) constant over time periods of interest. Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Conservation of Mass Conservation of Mass: Mass is not created nor destroyed. The total mass of the atmosphere is (to a very close approximation) constant over time periods of interest. Continuity: The fuid is continuous (it contains no holes). This is a fundamental assumption underlying atmospheric motions. The Continuity Equation is used to describe conservation of atmospheric mass. Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Conservation l There are certain parameters (energy, momentum, mass, air, water, ozone, number of atoms, etc.) that must be conserved. l Conservation means that in an isolated system that parameter remains constant. It’s not created. It’s not destroyed. But it can move around. l Is the Earth’s atmosphere isolated? The Earth’s atmosphere is not exactly isolated (escape to space, escape beneath the surface), but to a close approximation this is the case! Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 The Continuity Equation Some region of the atmosphere (not a fuid parcel) Variables we will need ∆z ⇢ Density (mass per unit volume) V = ∆x∆y∆z Volume m = ⇢V ∆y Mass ∆x Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 In the Eulerian frame we have a fxed volume and the fuid fows through it. ∆z ∆y ∆x Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 In the Eulerian frame we have a fxed volume and the fuid fows through it. Fluid parcels Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the rate of change of mass within this region? Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the rate of change of mass within this region? Mass fux through face i Change in mass ∆m = ∆t F in ∆A · i i allX faces i Time Area of face i Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the rate of change in ∆m = ∆t Fi ∆Ai of mass within this region? · allX faces i The mass fux through this face per unit area is equal to the mass density at the face times the perpendicular velocity in Fw = ⇢w uw Face W Units? Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Defnition: The rate of fow of fuid per unit area is the mass fux. F = ⇢u (x, y, z) ⇢u Mass fux at ( x, y, z ) in the x direction kg m kg 2 ∆z = m− . m3 · s s · Mass flux is mass per unit /me per unit area ∆y @(⇢u) ∆x ⇢u + + h.o.t. ∆x @x 2 x ✓ ◆ Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Defnition: The rate of fow of fuid per unit area is the mass fux. F = ⇢u (x, y, z) ⇢u Mass fux at ( x, y, z ) in the x direction kg m kg 2 ∆z = m− . m3 · s s · Mass flux is mass per unit /me per unit area ∆y @(⇢u) ∆x ∆x ⇢u + h.o.t. − @x 2 x ✓ ◆ Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the rate of change of mass within this region? The change of mass in the box is equal to the mass that fows into the box minus the mass that fows out of the box. Flux Area Mass out east (downstream) face h i⇥h i @(⇢u) ∆x F ∆A = ⇢u + ∆y∆z e e @x 2 ✓ ◆ Mass in west (upstream) face @(⇢u) ∆x F ∆A = ⇢u ∆y∆z Volume of box w w − @x 2 ✓ ◆ ∆m @(⇢u) Total change in = F ∆A F ∆A = ∆x∆y∆z mass per unit time ∆t w w − e e − @x Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the rate of change of mass within this region? Extend to three dimensions: The change in mass in the box is equal to the mass that fows into the box minus the mass that fows out of the box. ∆m @ @ @ = F in∆A = (⇢u)+ (⇢v)+ (⇢w) V ∆t i i − @x @y @z all faces i X ∆m ∆⇢ = Limit as V ∆t 0 @⇢ ! = (⇢u) @t r · Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Continuity Equation (Eulerian) @⇢ = (⇢u) @t r · Recognize the divergence. Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Continuity Equation: Eulerian @⇢ In the Eulerian frame, a = (⇢u) region of the atmosphere is a @t r · fxed volume and fuid fows through it. ∆z ∆y ∆x Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Question: What is the continuity equation in the Lagrangian frame? In the Lagrangian frame, the point of view follows the fuid parcel which is moving… ∆z ∆y …and changing shape (deforming) ∆x Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Continuity Equation: Lagrangian Starting with the continuity equation in the Eulerian frame @⇢ = (⇢u) @t r · Apply product rule (recall your vector identities) (⇢u)=⇢ u + u ⇢ r · r · · r Collect terms: @⇢ + u ⇢ = ⇢ u What is this? @t · r − r · Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Continuity Equation: Lagrangian @⇢ + u ⇢ = ⇢ u @t · r − r · Material Derivave 1 D⇢ = u ⇢ Dt r · Evolution equation for density in the Lagrangian Frame Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Continuity Equation: Lagrangian 1 D⇢ = u ⇢ Dt r · The change in density following the motion is proportional to the divergence Convergence = increase in density (compression) Divergence = decrease in density (expansion) Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Divergence What is the divergence of this fow? Will density increase or decrease? Calculate it! 1 D⇢ u =(x, y) = u ⇢ Dt r · Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Convergence What is the divergence of this fow? Will density increase or decrease? Calculate it! 1 D⇢ u =( x, y) = u − − ⇢ Dt r · Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Mixed Flow What is the divergence of this fow? Will density increase or decrease? Calculate it! 1 D⇢ u =(x, y) = u − ⇢ Dt r · Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Tracer Transport Passive tracers (chemical species, moisture) are transported with the fow. Their mixing ratio (the ratio of tracer mass to fuid mass) is constant within a fuid parcel: Dqi =0 (Advection equation) Dt To write a conservation law for tracers, we use the continuity equation: @⇢ + u ⇢ = ⇢ u @t · r − r · @qi @⇢ ⇢ + ⇢u qi =0 qi + qiu ⇢ = ⇢qi u @t @t · r − r · · r @ (⇢q )+ (⇢q u)=0 (Flux-Form) @t i r · i Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 Thanks! Paul Ullrich The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics March 2014 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): 21St Century Analysis
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Joule's 19th Century Energy Conservation Meta-Law and the 20th Century Physics (Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): 21st Century Analysis Vladik Kreinovich · Olga Kosheleva Received: December 22, 2019 / Accepted: date Abstract Joule's Energy Conservation Law was the first \meta-law": a gen- eral principle that all physical equations must satisfy. It has led to many important and useful physical discoveries. However, a recent analysis seems to indicate that this meta-law is inconsistent with other principles { such as the existence of free will. We show that this conclusion about inconsistency is based on a seemingly reasonable { but simplified { analysis of the situation. We also show that a more detailed mathematical and physical analysis of the situation reveals that not only Joule's principle remains true { it is actually strengthened: it is no longer a principle that all physical theories should satisfy { it is a principle that all physical theories do satisfy. Keywords Joule · Energy Conservation Law · Free will · General Relativity · Planck's constant 1 Introduction Joule's Energy Conservation Law: historically the first meta-law. Throughout the centuries, physicists have been trying to come up with equa- tions and laws that describe different physical phenomenon. Before Joule, how- ever, there were no general principles that restricted such equations. James Joule showed, in [13{15], that different physical phenomena are inter-related, and that there is a general principle covering all the phenom- This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science) and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence).
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Conservation of Mass
    Modeling Conservation of Mass How is mass conserved (protected from loss)? Imagine an evening campfire. As the wood burns, you notice that the logs have become a small pile of ashes. What happened? Was the wood destroyed by the fire? A scientific principle called the law of conservation of mass states that matter is neither created nor destroyed. So, what happened to the wood? Think back. Did you observe smoke rising from the fire? When wood burns, atoms in the wood combine with oxygen atoms in the air in a chemical reaction called combustion. The products of this burning reaction are ashes as well as the carbon dioxide and water vapor in smoke. The gases escape into the air. We also know from the law of conservation of mass that the mass of the reactants must equal the mass of all the products. How does that work with the campfire? mass – a measure of how much matter is present in a substance law of conservation of mass – states that the mass of all reactants must equal the mass of all products and that matter is neither created nor destroyed If you could measure the mass of the wood and oxygen before you started the fire and then measure the mass of the smoke and ashes after it burned, what would you find? The total mass of matter after the fire would be the same as the total mass of matter before the fire. Therefore, matter was neither created nor destroyed in the campfire; it just changed form. The same atoms that made up the materials before the reaction were simply rearranged to form the materials left after the reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Noether's Theorems and Gauge Symmetries
    Noether’s Theorems and Gauge Symmetries Katherine Brading St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, OX2 6LE [email protected] and Harvey R. Brown Sub-faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX1 4JJ [email protected] August 2000 Consideration of the Noether variational problem for any theory whose action is invariant under global and/or local gauge transformations leads to three distinct the- orems. These include the familiar Noether theorem, but also two equally important but much less well-known results. We present, in a general form, all the main results relating to the Noether variational problem for gauge theories, and we show the rela- tionships between them. These results hold for both Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. 1 Introduction There is widespread confusion over the role of Noether’s theorem in the case of local gauge symmetries,1 as pointed out in this journal by Karatas and Kowalski (1990), and Al-Kuwari and Taha (1991).2 In our opinion, the main reason for the confusion is failure to appreciate that Noether offered two theorems in her 1918 work. One theorem applies to symmetries associated with finite dimensional arXiv:hep-th/0009058v1 8 Sep 2000 Lie groups (global symmetries), and the other to symmetries associated with infinite dimensional Lie groups (local symmetries); the latter theorem has been widely forgotten. Knowledge of Noether’s ‘second theorem’ helps to clarify the significance of the results offered by Al-Kuwari and Taha for local gauge sym- metries, along with other important and related work such as that of Bergmann (1949), Trautman (1962), Utiyama (1956, 1959), and Weyl (1918, 1928/9).
    [Show full text]
  • Derivation of Fluid Flow Equations
    TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2017 1 Fluid Flow Equations DERIVATION OF FLUID FLOW EQUATIONS Review of basic steps Generally speaking, flow equations for flow in porous materials are based on a set of mass, momentum and energy conservation equations, and constitutive equations for the fluids and the porous material involved. For simplicity, we will in the following assume isothermal conditions, so that we not have to involve an energy conservation equation. However, in cases of changing reservoir temperature, such as in the case of cold water injection into a warmer reservoir, this may be of importance. Below, equations are initially described for single phase flow in linear, one- dimensional, horizontal systems, but are later on extended to multi-phase flow in two and three dimensions, and to other coordinate systems. Conservation of mass Consider the following one dimensional rod of porous material: Mass conservation may be formulated across a control element of the slab, with one fluid of density ρ is flowing through it at a velocity u: u ρ Δx The mass balance for the control element is then written as: ⎧Mass into the⎫ ⎧Mass out of the ⎫ ⎧ Rate of change of mass⎫ ⎨ ⎬ − ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬ , ⎩element at x ⎭ ⎩element at x + Δx⎭ ⎩ inside the element ⎭ or ∂ {uρA} − {uρA} = {φAΔxρ}. x x+ Δx ∂t Dividing by Δx, and taking the limit as Δx approaches zero, we get the conservation of mass, or continuity equation: ∂ ∂ − (Aρu) = (Aφρ). ∂x ∂t For constant cross sectional area, the continuity equation simplifies to: ∂ ∂ − (ρu) = (φρ) . ∂x ∂t Next, we need to replace the velocity term by an equation relating it to pressure gradient and fluid and rock properties, and the density and porosity terms by appropriate pressure dependent functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Conversation of Energy
    Law of Conservation of Mass: "In any kind of physical or chemical process, mass is neither created nor destroyed - the mass before the process equals the mass after the process." - the total mass of the system does not change, the total mass of the products of a chemical reaction is always the same as the total mass of the original materials. "Physics for scientists and engineers," 4th edition, Vol.1, Raymond A. Serway, Saunders College Publishing, 1996. Ex. 1) When wood burns, mass seems to disappear because some of the products of reaction are gases; if the mass of the original wood is added to the mass of the oxygen that combined with it and if the mass of the resulting ash is added to the mass o the gaseous products, the two sums will turn out exactly equal. 2) Iron increases in weight on rusting because it combines with gases from the air, and the increase in weight is exactly equal to the weight of gas consumed. Out of thousands of reactions that have been tested with accurate chemical balances, no deviation from the law has ever been found. Law of Conversation of Energy: The total energy of a closed system is constant. Matter is neither created nor destroyed – total mass of reactants equals total mass of products You can calculate the change of temp by simply understanding that energy and the mass is conserved - it means that we added the two heat quantities together we can calculate the change of temperature by using the law or measure change of temp and show the conservation of energy E1 + E2 = E3 -> E(universe) = E(System) + E(Surroundings) M1 + M2 = M3 Is T1 + T2 = unknown (No, no law of conservation of temperature, so we have to use the concept of conservation of energy) Total amount of thermal energy in beaker of water in absolute terms as opposed to differential terms (reference point is 0 degrees Kelvin) Knowns: M1, M2, T1, T2 (Kelvin) When add the two together, want to know what T3 and M3 are going to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Conservation Law in Review
    The Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Conservation Law: A Summary of the Statutory Provisions 58 P.S. §§ 401-419 (March 2009) Prepared by Anna M. Clovis, Research Assistant Under the Supervision of Ross H. Pifer, J.D., LL.M., Director The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Penn State Dickinson School of Law http://www.dsl.psu.edu/centers/aglaw.cfm The Oil and Gas Conservation Law (OGC Law) is one of the primary laws that regulate the extraction of natural gas in Pennsylvania. The OGC Law has been summarized in a section- by-section manner in this research publication, which provides an overview of the issues regulated by the OGC Law. To obtain detailed information on the individual statutory sections, the full text of the OGC Law should be reviewed. Declaration of Policy The OGC Law reflects a policy “to foster, encourage, and promote the development, production, and utilization” of Pennsylvania’s oil and natural gas resources. Development activities should occur in a manner to prevent the waste of oil and natural gas. Oil and natural gas operations should be regulated to ensure that “the Commonwealth shall realize and enjoy the maximum benefit of these natural resources.” Since strata above the Onondaga horizon have been extensively developed since 1850, it would be impractical to include shallow wells within the regulations of the OGC Law. Section 1: Short Title (58 P.S. § 401) This statute shall be known as the “Oil and Gas Conservation Law.” Section 2: Definitions (58 P.S. § 402) This section provides statutory definitions for various oil and gas terms used in the OGC Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Axiomatic Formal Theory to the Abraham--Minkowski
    Application of axiomatic formal theory to the Abraham{Minkowski controversy Michael E. Crenshaw∗ Charles M. Bowden Research Laboratory, US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) - Aviation and Missile Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898, USA (Dated: August 23, 2019) A transparent linear dielectric in free space that is illuminated by a finite quasimonochromatic field is a thermodynamically closed system. The energy{momentum tensor that is derived from Maxwellian continuum electrodynamics for this closed system is inconsistent with conservation of momentum; that is the foundational issue of the century-old Abraham{Minkowski controversy. The long-standing resolution of the Abraham{Minkowski controversy is to view continuum electrodynam- ics as a subsystem and write the total energy{momentum tensor as the sum of an electromagnetic energy{momentum tensor and a phenomenological material energy{momentum tensor. We prove that if we add a material energy{momentum tensor to the electromagnetic energy{momentum ten- sor, in the prescribed manner, then the total energy, the total linear momentum, and the total angular momentum are constant in time, but other aspects of the conservation laws are violated. Specifically, the four-divergence of the total (electromagnetic plus material) energy{momentum ten- sor is self-inconsistent and violates Poynting's theorem. Then, the widely accepted resolution of the Abraham{Minkowski dilemma is proven to be manifestly false. The fundamental physical principles of electrodynamics, conservation laws, and special relativity are intrinsic to the vacuum; the ex- tant dielectric versions of physical principles are non-fundamental extrapolations from the vacuum theory. Because the resolution of the Abraham{Minkowski momentum controversy is proven false, the extant theoretical treatments of macroscopic continuum electrodynamics, dielectric special rel- ativity, and energy{momentum conservation in a simple linear dielectric are mutually inconsistent for macroscopic fields in matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Concepts: Conservation of Mass, Momentum, Energy Fluid: a Material
    Key concepts: Conservation of mass, momentum, energy Fluid: a material that deforms continuously and permanently under the application of a shearing stress, no matter how small. Fluids are either gases or liquids. (Under very specialized conditions, a phase of intermediate properties can be stable, but we won’t consider that possibility.) In liquids, the molecules are relatively closely spaced, allowing the magnitude of their (attractive, electrically-based) interaction energy to be of the same magnitude as their kinetic energy. As a result, they exist as a loose collection of clusters. In gases, the molecules are much more widely separated, so the kinetic energy (at a given temperature, identical to that in the liquid) is far greater than the interaction energy (much less than in the liquid), and molecule do not form clusters. In a liquid, the molecules themselves typically occupy a few percent of the total space available; in a gas, they occupy a few thousandths of a percent. Nevertheless, for our purposes, all fluids are considered to be continua (no voids or holes).The absence of significant intermolecular attraction allows gases to fill whatever volume is available to them, whereas the presence of such attraction in liquids prevents them from doing so. The attractive forces in liquid water are unusually strong, compared to other liquids. Properties of Fluids: m Density is mass/volume: ρ = . The density of liquid water is V 3 o −3 3 ~1.0 kg/m ; that of air at 20 C is ~1.2x10 kg/m . mg W Specific weight is weight/volume: γ = = = ρg V V C:\Adata\CLASNOTE\342\Class Notes\Key concepts_Topic 1.doc 1 γ Specific gravity is density normalized to the density of water: sg..= i γ w V 1 Specific volume is volume/mass: V = = m ρ Bulk modulus or modulus of elasticity is the pressure change per dp dp fractional change in volume or density: E =− = .
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Laws in Arbitrary Space-Times Annales De L’I
    ANNALES DE L’I. H. P., SECTION A I. M. BENN Conservation laws in arbitrary space-times Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 37, no 1 (1982), p. 67-91 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1982__37_1_67_0> © Gauthier-Villars, 1982, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam. org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. Henri Poincaré, Section A : Vol. XXXVII, n° 1. 1982, 67 Physique theorique.’ Conservation laws in arbitrary space-times I. M. BENN Department of Physics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, U. K. ABSTRACT. - Definitions of energy and angular momentum are dis- cussed within the context of field theories in arbitrary space-times. It is shown that such definitions rely upon the existence of symmetries of the space-time geometry. The treatment of that geometry as a background is contrasted with Einstein’s theory of dynamical geometry : general rela- tivity. It is shown that in the former case symmetries lead to the existence of closed 3-forms, whereas in the latter they lead to the existence of 2-forms which are closed in source-free regions, thus allowing mass and angular momentum to be defined as de Rham periods. INTRODUCTION The concepts of energy and angular momentum are perhaps two of the most deeply rooted concepts of physics, yet in general relativity their exact role is still open to question [7]] [2 ].
    [Show full text]
  • This Resource Defines Terms That Are Used in Or Support the Risk Assessment Document
    GLOSSARY This resource defines terms that are used in or support the risk assessment document. These definitions were based on terms defined in documents included in the reference section, with modifications as appropriate to address the City of New Rochelle specific definitions and requirements. 100-year flood – A flood that has a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. This flood event is also referred to as the base flood. The term "100-year flood" can be misleading; it is not the flood that will occur once every 100 years. Rather, it is the flood elevation that has a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded each year. Therefore, the 100-year flood could occur more than once in a relatively short period of time. The 100-year flood, which is the standard used by most federal and state agencies, is used by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as the standard for floodplain management to determine the need for flood insurance. 500-year flood – A flood that has a 0.2-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any one year. Aggregate Data – Data gathered together across an area or region (for example, census tract or census block data). Annualized Loss – The estimated long-term value of losses from potential future hazard occurrences of a particular type in any given single year in a specified geographic area. In other words, the average annual loss that is likely to be incurred each year based on frequency of occurrence and loss estimates. Note that the loss in any given year can be substantially higher or lower than the estimated annualized loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity Equation in Pressure Coordinates
    Continuity Equation in Pressure Coordinates Here we will derive the continuity equation from the principle that mass is conserved for a parcel following the fluid motion (i.e., there is no flow across the boundaries of the parcel). This implies that δxδyδp δM = ρ δV = ρ δxδyδz = − g is conserved following the fluid motion: 1 d(δM ) = 0 δM dt 1 d()δM = 0 δM dt g d ⎛ δxδyδp ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ = 0 δxδyδp dt ⎝ g ⎠ 1 ⎛ d(δp) d(δy) d(δx)⎞ ⎜δxδy +δxδp +δyδp ⎟ = 0 δxδyδp ⎝ dt dt dt ⎠ 1 ⎛ dp ⎞ 1 ⎛ dy ⎞ 1 ⎛ dx ⎞ δ ⎜ ⎟ + δ ⎜ ⎟ + δ ⎜ ⎟ = 0 δp ⎝ dt ⎠ δy ⎝ dt ⎠ δx ⎝ dt ⎠ Taking the limit as δx, δy, δp → 0, ∂u ∂v ∂ω Continuity equation + + = 0 in pressure ∂x ∂y ∂p coordinates 1 Determining Vertical Velocities • Typical large-scale vertical motions in the atmosphere are of the order of 0. 01-01m/s0.1 m/s. • Such motions are very difficult, if not impossible, to measure directly. Typical observational errors for wind measurements are ~1 m/s. • Quantitative estimates of vertical velocity must be inferred from quantities that can be directly measured with sufficient accuracy. Vertical Velocity in P-Coordinates The equivalent of the vertical velocity in p-coordinates is: dp ∂p r ∂p ω = = +V ⋅∇p + w dt ∂t ∂z Based on a scaling of the three terms on the r.h.s., the last term is at least an order of magnitude larger than the other two. Making the hydrostatic approximation yields ∂p ω ≈ w = −ρgw ∂z Typical large-scale values: for w, 0.01 m/s = 1 cm/s for ω, 0.1 Pa/s = 1 μbar/s 2 The Kinematic Method By integrating the continuity equation in (x,y,p) coordinates, ω can be obtained from the mean divergence in a layer: ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ∂ω ⎜ + ⎟ + = 0 continuity equation in (x,y,p) coordinates ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ p ∂p p2 p2 ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ∂ω = − ⎜ + ⎟ ∂p rearrange and integrate over the layer ∫p ∫ ⎜ ⎟ 1 ∂x ∂y p1⎝ ⎠ p ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ω(p )−ω(p ) = (p − p )⎜ + ⎟ overbar denotes pressure- 2 1 1 2 ⎜ ⎟ weighted vertical average ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ p To determine vertical motion at a pressure level p2, assume that p1 = surface pressure and there is no vertical motion at the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Newtonian Fluids
    CM4650 Chapter 3 Newtonian Fluid 2/5/2018 Mechanics Chapter 3: Newtonian Fluids CM4650 Polymer Rheology Michigan Tech Navier-Stokes Equation v vv p 2 v g t 1 © Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U. Chapter 3: Newtonian Fluid Mechanics TWO GOALS •Derive governing equations (mass and momentum balances •Solve governing equations for velocity and stress fields QUICK START V W x First, before we get deep into 2 v (x ) H derivation, let’s do a Navier-Stokes 1 2 x1 problem to get you started in the x3 mechanics of this type of problem solving. 2 © Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U. 1 CM4650 Chapter 3 Newtonian Fluid 2/5/2018 Mechanics EXAMPLE: Drag flow between infinite parallel plates •Newtonian •steady state •incompressible fluid •very wide, long V •uniform pressure W x2 v1(x2) H x1 x3 3 EXAMPLE: Poiseuille flow between infinite parallel plates •Newtonian •steady state •Incompressible fluid •infinitely wide, long W x2 2H x1 x3 v (x ) x1=0 1 2 x1=L p=Po p=PL 4 2 CM4650 Chapter 3 Newtonian Fluid 2/5/2018 Mechanics Engineering Quantities of In more complex flows, we can use Interest general expressions that work in all cases. (any flow) volumetric ⋅ flow rate ∬ ⋅ | average 〈 〉 velocity ∬ Using the general formulas will Here, is the outwardly pointing unit normal help prevent errors. of ; it points in the direction “through” 5 © Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U. The stress tensor was Total stress tensor, Π: invented to make the calculation of fluid stress easier. Π ≡ b (any flow, small surface) dS nˆ Force on the S ⋅ Π surface V (using the stress convention of Understanding Rheology) Here, is the outwardly pointing unit normal of ; it points in the direction “through” 6 © Faith A.
    [Show full text]