Best Practices Research and Assessment of Station Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Best Practices Research and Assessment of Station Areas Phase 1 RePoRt: Best Practices Research and assessment of station areas east C rrid r Implementati n support FEBRUARY 2013 In association with: BAE Urban Economics and Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates The Growing Transit Communities Partnership is funded by the Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Program of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government. Acknowledgements PRojeCt management team of the east CorridoR task force The following members of the East Corridor Task Force are serving on the Project Management Team for the East Corridor Implementation Support Project. Wes Edwards – King County Tom Hinman – Redmond Community Representative Emil King – City of Bellevue Doug Mathews – Bellevue Community Representative Lori Peckol – City of Redmond Tracy Reich – Impact Capital Arthur Sullivan – A Regional Coalition for Housing (ARCH) Alternates: Paul Inghram – City of Bellevue Sarah Stiteler – City of Redmond Puget sound RegIonal Council, GrowIng TransIt CommunItIes PaRtneRship Ben Bakkenta, Program Manager Mary Pat Lawlor, Principal Planner Cameron Duncan, Planning Technician Consultants Otak, Inc.—Prime BAE Urban Economics, Inc. Mandi Roberts, Project Manager Paul Peninger Kurt Creager Tom Litster Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Jenny Ngo Kevin Shively C east C rrid r Implementati n support taBle of Contents PRefaCe IntRoduCtIon and The Regional Vision............................................................................................1 PRojeCt oveRvIew Summary of the Growing Transit Communities Partnership..................................1 East Corridor Implementation Support Project.................................................... 4 Phase 1 Tasks and Station Areas Analyzed........................................................... 6 Best PRaCtices Research Purpose of the Best Practices Research..............................................................11 General Approach to the Best Practices Research................................................11 Research Framework–Key Questions Addressed by the Research..........................13 Best Practices Research Findings.......................................................................17 • Affordable Housing...........................................18 • Partnerships.......................................................58 • Business Retention and Attraction..................48 • Transportation Access and Connectivity.........73 assessment of statIon Areas Key Needs and Opportunities in Each Station Area............................................. 99 Assessment Methodology and Criteria..............................................................106 Partnership for Sustainable Communities Livability Principles..........................107 Assessment Matrix..........................................................................................108 Station Areas Selected for Phase 2 Focus...........................................................111 next stePs Phase 2 of the East Corridor Implementation Support Project............................119 Description of Work Elements...........................................................................119 Proposed Deliverables.....................................................................................127 Work Plan.......................................................................................................127 d east C rrid r Implementati n support Forces are charged with analyzing and reviewing focused implementation strategies and tools PRefaCe existing conditions, and identifying unique for specific East Corridor station areas. Seattle opportunities and challenges for development and Mercer Island had already completed The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) of current and future transit station areas. extensive planning for the station areas in is coordinating a regional effort called the their jurisdictions. (They each have one station Growing Transit Communities Partnership to in the corridor.) The cities of Bellevue and help make the most of voter-approved $15 east Corridor Implementation Redmond felt the station areas in the Bel-Red billion investments in regional high-capacity support Project Corridor were in most need of implementation transit. The Growing Transit Communities When developing the Growing Transit support. Given these considerations, the Partnership is funded by a grant from the Communities Partnership work plan, the partners Task Force determined that the East Corridor US Department of Housing and Urban felt that it was important to focus implementation Implementation Support Project should focus Development’s Sustainable Communities activities in specific station areas of the region’s on the following subset of East Corridor station Regional Planning Grant Program. transit corridors to serve as models for other parts areas in the cities of Bellevue and Redmond, of the region. In the case of the East Corridor, along East Link and King County Metro’s The Growing Transit Communities Partnership the intention was to work with the East Corridor RapidRide Route B stations: is supporting neighborhood planning for Task Force to identify what catalyst project, or sustainable communities around more than projects, were most appropriate. Light Rail Station Areas for the East Corridor seventy new transit centers—covering three Implementation Support Project: counties in sixteen cities—that are expected In 2011, the Sound Transit Board of Directors • Hospital Station Area in Bellevue in the region over the next few decades. made its final decision about the East Link • 120th Avenue NE/Spring Creek Station Area The Partnership’s goal is to put jobs and light rail transit (LRT) corridor alignment in Bellevue opportunities closer to where people live, and station locations. Also in 2011, King while sustaining a healthy environment and County Metro began operation of its Bus • 130th Avenue NE Station Area in Bellevue economy in the decades to come. Rapid Transit service (BRT) RapidRide line B. • Overlake Village Station Area in Redmond In order to help areas around LRT and BRT Planning activities focus along the three light stations transform into more transit-oriented • Overlake Transit Center Station Area rail corridors from Seattle north to the city of communities, the four cities participating in in Redmond Everett, south to Tacoma, and east to the city of the East Corridor Task Force (Seattle, Mercer Redmond. Task Forces have been formed for each Island, Bellevue, and Redmond) and other Task Existing Metro Transit RapidRide B Line Station of the three geographic corridors. These Task Force members were interested in developing Areas in Bellevue’s Crossroads Neighborhood: e east C rrid r Implementati n support four focus areas for East Corridor Task Force. In order to keep on schedule, the Task Force identified a subset of Implementation activities the members, called the Project Management The East Corridor Task Force examined key Team, who will help advance the project issues and potential barriers to transit-oriented and bring back timely matters to the Task development in the East Corridor. The Task Force for direction and decisions. The Project Force identified the need for detailed strategies Management Team members were solicited and action steps to implement existing local from the general membership of the Task Force plans, particularly in the areas of: and confirmed by the Task Force co-chairs. • Affordable Housing The Acknowledgements page lists Project Management Team members. • Business Retention and Attraction • Public and Private Partnerships Through spring 2012, the Project Management Team worked to finalize a work program, • Transportation Access and Connectivity. Northgate Walking Tour (Source: Growing Transit Communities, which was brought to the Task Force for Puget Sound Regional Council) approval. The selection process for the It is important to note that these four focus consultant team was handled through PSRC’s areas are not in order of priority, and that competitive procurement process, and a • NE 10th Street Station Area the Task Force specified that each focus area consultant team was selected and contracted should generally be given equal weight and • NE 15th Street Station Area with in early summer 2012. attention during the course of the project. The overall purpose of the East Corridor In July 2012, the consultant team and the Implementation Support Project is to advance east Corridor Implementation Project Management Team began working on implementation and move forward with steps support Project guidance Phase 1 of the East Corridor Implementation that have not already been completed by As the lead and fiduciary agent for the Support Project, which is detailed in the the cities of Bellevue and Redmond in their Growing Transit Communities Partnership chapters that follow. The last part of this Phase respective plans. The project will build on grant, PSRC has overall project management 1 report identifies the process by which the planning decisions that have already been responsibilities.
Recommended publications
  • Special Commission Skytrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements
    Special Commission SkyTrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements The Special Commissioner gratefully acknowledges the generous and dedicated support and advice of the agencies, organizations and individuals that contributed to the Special Commission SkyTrain Review. The cooperation and assistance of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink); Greater Vancouver Regional District; City of Vancouver; City of New Westminster; City of Burnaby; City of Coquitlam; City of Port Moody; Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Environment Canada; Health Canada; Canadian Coast Guard; BC Transportation Financing Authority; BC Assets and Land Corporation; Simon Fraser Health Region; and BC Ministries of Environment, Lands and Parks, Transportation and Highways, Municipal Affairs, Small Business, Tourism and Culture were instrumental to the work of the Special Commission. The cooperation of the BC Environmental Assessment Office in providing considerable technical and administrative resources and support is greatly appreciated. In addition, the Special Commissioner particularly wishes to thank the members of the public and organizations who made submissions or participated in the workshops or public meetings for their efforts in the public interest. Staff Seconded to Special Commission David Johns, Kim Fawthorpe, Michael Price, Paul Finkel, Alan Calder, Mel Turner, Jennifer Kay, Tami Payne, Shari Steinbach, Sylvia Hinks, Eileen Bennett, Tanya Paz, and Joy Cohen. Environmental Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Community Open House #1 South Gate Park January 27, 2016 Today’S Agenda
    Community Open House #1 South Gate Park January 27, 2016 Today’s Agenda 1) Gateway District Specific Plan 2) Efforts To Date 3) Specific Plan Process 4) TOD Best Practices 5) Community Feedback 27 JANUARY 2016 | page 2 Gateway District Specific Plan What is the West Santa Ana Branch? The West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB) is a transit corridor connecting southeast Los Angeles County (including South Gate) to Downtown Los Angeles via the abandoned Pacific Electric Right- of-Way (ROW). Goals for the Corridor: 1. PLACE-MAKING: Make the station the center of a new destination that is special and unique to each community. 2. CONNECTIONS: Connect residential neighborhoods, employment centers, and destinations to the station. 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOL: Concentrate jobs and homes in the station area to reap the benefits that transit brings to communities. 27 JANUARY 2016 | page 4 What is light rail transit? The South Gate Transit Station will be served by light rail and bus services. Light Rail Transit (LRT) is a form of urban rail public transportation that operates at a higher capacity and higher speed compared to buses or street-running tram systems (i.e. trolleys or streetcars). LRT Benefits: • LRT is a quiet, electric system that is environmentally-friendly. • Using LRT helps reduce automobile dependence, traffic congestion, and Example of an at-grade alignment LRT, Gold Line in Pasadena, CA. pollution. • LRT is affordable and a less costly option than the automobile (where costs include parking, insurance, gasoline, maintenance, tickets, etc..). • LRT is an efficient and convenient way to get to and from destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Plan
    Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Document Overview.Cdr
    Section 2. CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND ! Local & Regional Setting ! Historical Context ! Physical Context: Land Use ! Physical Context: Mobility ! Physical Context: Urban Design ! Socio-economic Context ! Policy Context ! Community Values Section 2 CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND 11 Local & Regional Setting Regional Setting Pasadena is situated at the foot of the San Gabriel Mountains in the western San Gabriel Valley, approximately 10 miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles. This location offers numerous advantages, including convenient freeway and airport access that will continue to provide the City a competitive advantage as a regional business hub. Moreover, few localities can match the physical beauty afforded by the backdrop of the San Gabriels. San Gabriel Mountains Local Setting Located in the heart of the City, the Central District’s approximately 960 acres essentially correspond to the area recognized by Pasadena’s residents as “Downtown.” (Downtown and Central District will be used interchangeably in this document.) Included within its boundaries are the activity centers popularly known as Old Pasadena, the Civic Center, the Playhouse District, and South Lake Avenue; each makes a special contribution to this urban setting with an active mixture of uses. The Central District’s boundaries are clearly marked to the north and west by the 210 and 710 Freeways respectively, and it’s buildings are prominent features along these highways. Approaching the campuses of the California Institute of California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and Pasadena City College (PCC), the eastern Technology boundary lies one to two blocks east of Lake Avenue. The southern limit roughly follows California Boulevard, except that the Specific Plan area includes the Arroyo Parkway corridor extending from the 110 Freeway into the midst of Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns Along
    Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns along Three New Transit Lines March 2011 About This Study Rails to Real Estate was prepared by the Center for Transit-Oriented Development (CTOD). The CTOD is the only national nonprofit effort dedicated to providing best practices, research and tools to support market- based development in pedestrian-friendly communities near public transportation. We are a partnership of two national nonprofit organizations – Reconnecting America and the Center for Neighborhood Technology – and a research and consulting firm, Strategic Economics. Together, we work at the intersection of transportation planning, regional planning, climate change and sustainability, affordability, economic development, real estate and investment. Our goal is to help create neighborhoods where young and old, rich and poor, can live comfortably and prosper, with affordable and healthy lifestyle choices and ample and easy access to opportunity for all. Report Authors This report was prepared by Nadine Fogarty and Mason Austin, staff of Strategic Economics and CTOD. Additional support and assistance was provided by Eli Popuch, Dena Belzer, Jeff Wood, Abigail Thorne-Lyman, Allison Nemirow and Melissa Higbee. Acknowledgements The Center for Transit-Oriented Development would like to thank the Federal Transit Administration. The authors are also grateful to several persons who assisted with data collection and participated in interviews, including: Bill Sirois, Denver Regional Transit District; Catherine Cox-Blair, Reconnecting America; Caryn Wenzara, City of Denver; Frank Cannon, Continuum Partners, LLC; Gideon Berger, Urban Land Institute/Rose Center; Karen Good, City of Denver; Kent Main, City of Charlotte; Loretta Daniel, City of Aurora; Mark Fabel, McGough; Mark Garner, City of Minneapolis; Michael Lander, Lander Group; Norm Bjornnes, Oaks Properties LLC; Paul Mogush, City of Minneapolis; Peter Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Westside Cities Subregion Project List 6/23/2015
    Westside Cities Subregion Project List 6/23/2015 Non‐ Estimated Estimated Project ID Project/Program Category Jurisdiction Project Description Prioritized Minimum Cost Maximum Cost Los Angeles ‐ Westside, Santa 1WS‐119 Transit Metro Purple Line Extension Westwood/VA to City of Santa Monica $825,679,520 $1,238,519,280 Monica Los Angeles ‐ Westside, West Crenshaw Bl Corridor Extension (beyond segment funded by Measure R) all 2WS‐22 Transit $2,336,400,000 $6,365,700,000 Hollywood the way to West Hollywood/Hollywood Los Angeles ‐ Westside, Beverly 3WS‐23 Transit Metro Purple Line Extension West Hollywood Extension $2,395,760,000 $3,593,640,000 Hills, West Hollywood I‐405/Sepulveda Pass ‐ Alternative multimodal linkage from the Westside 4WS‐282 Transit Los Angeles ‐ Westside $1,294,720,318 $5,996,262,922 to the San Fernando Valley and LAX, taking pressure off of the I‐405 Los Angeles ‐ Westside, I‐405‐ Express Bus Improvements (e.g., peak period shoulder lane) on I‐ 5WS‐294 Transit Unicorporated ‐ Westside, $240,000,000 $360,000,000 405 Culver City Sepulveda Pass – Increase express bus service over Sepulveda Pass, with 6WS‐301 Transit Los Angeles ‐ Westside collector/feeder service throughout West LA and the San Fernando Valley. Los Angeles ‐ Westside, Green Line Extension on Florence Av/ BNSF Railway ‐ Build rail to connect 7WS‐316 Transit $1,276,042,367 $1,389,588,510 Unicorporated ‐ Westside Harbor and Crenshaw Corridors to LAX utilizing existing BNSF rail line Implement City of LA Transit Enhanced Network as defined in the Mobility 8WS‐3161 Transit Los Angeles ‐ Westside $60,962,660 $12,802,158,600 Plan 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • Broncosride Pickup Schedule for December 22, 2019
    BroncosRide and Light Rail Service page 1 of 2 BroncosRide Schedule for: Sunday, December 22, 2019 Route: Park-n-Ride / Stop / Station Times are approximate Post game bus location** BR26: Dry Creek & University 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 12:55 PM Row 22 Arapahoe High School BR24: Alameda Havana 12:25 PM 12:40 PM 12:55 PM Row 21 BR10: Boulder High School 11:35 AM 11:55 AM 12:15 PM Row15-16 Arapahoe & 17th BR32: El Rancho 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:35 PM Row 4 BR32: Evergreen 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:20 PM Row 4 BR38: Federal Shuttle: Lincoln HS (Hazel Ct & Iliff) and bus stops on Federal Blvd 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5 - 10 minutes until 1:50 PM Row 28 between Evans and 8th Ave BR20: Longmont Park-n-Ride 11:30 AM 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:30 PM Rows 17-18 815 South Main Street BR44: Nine Mile (Ga te F) 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:00 PM Rows 23-24 BR8: Olde Town Arvada Discontinued Discontinued: Ride G-Line to DUS and Transfer to C, E or W-Lines to Broncos Stadium BR48: Parker 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM Row 19 BR48: Pinery 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:05 PM 12:20 PM Row 19 BR56: South High School 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:35 PM 12:50 PM Row 26 Louisiana & Gilpin BR4: Thornton (Gate C) 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:35 PM Rows 9-12 BR10: US 36 & Broomfield Station (Gate 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:55 AM 12:05 PM 12:15 PM 12:25 PM 12:45 PM Rows 15-16 K) BR10: US 36 & McCaslin Stn (Gate A) 11:45
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Allen Station Connections
    Allen Connections metro.net Destinations Lines Stops IYWb[DcZJc^i/&$'B^aZ JJ;CFB;7BO;CFB; 7BO C;HH;JJIJC;HH;JJ IJ ;L;BODFB;L;BOD FB BEC7L?IJ7IJBEC7 L?IJ7 IJ Alhambra 485 B BEC7L?IJ7IJ Altadena 180, 485, 686 AJ 8EOBIJEDIJ D;BIED7BO L L L MH?=>J7L Av 64 256 K 7 7 ; BC F7BEC7IJ ? H 7L Azusa FT690 B 7 I Cal State LA Station Å 485 B J :KD>7C7BO California Bl 177, ARTS 20 BK Cal Tech 485, ARTS 10, 20 BGHL EH7D=;=HEL;8B EH7D=;=HEL;8B Å B Claremont TransCenter FT690 9H7M<EH:7BO Colorado Bl 180, 256, 686, ARTS 10 BGH ;7HB>7CIJ ; E B7IBKD7IIJ KL : D 8 H ? 7 E BGH ; Del Mar Station 177, 686, ARTS 20 B 9B?<JED7BOED 7BO 7 E 7 L A E D KL B H I7DJ787H87H7IJ 7 CEDJ;L?IJ7IJL?IJ7 IJ ; C 7 E L H B >?BB7 B >EBB?IJED Downtown Los Angeles 485 B Je=ersonsonn ; D D;MJED7BO >7C?BJED7L B B ? ? B7A;7L C?9>?=7D7L 7 9>;IJ;H7L C;DJEH7L M?BIED7L 97J7B?D77L C7HL?IJ77L 9B7HA7BO Park 887B:M?D7BO7B:M?D 7BO I?;HH78ED?J77L I I I?D7BE77L ; ;BCEB?DE7L 7 Eastern Av 256 K ; 7BB;D7L C F7BEL;H:;7L F El Sereno 256 K L?BB7IJ L?BB7IJIJ O Villa Gardens Kaiser B Encino CE549 B 7 Retirement Clinic JOB;H7BO : I Fremont Av 485 B Commmunity < M7=D;HIJM7=D;H IJ J = J >K:IED7L ; Glendale via 134 Fwy CE549 B 8;JJI7BO 8 K C7FB;MO Lake Avenue Church C7FB;IJ; IJ Highland Park 256 87HJB;JJ7BO 7bb[dIjWj_ed G C[ceh_WbFWhaIjWj_ed C7FB;IJ JPL 177 <MO '&% 7 BWa[IjWj_ed <EEJ>?BB LA County+USC 485 B IJJ 9EHIEDD L Medical Center Station @ 7 8 A 7 I L L 9EHIEDIJ > E La Verne FT690 B 7 H 7 B 7L O 7 B A L 7 BEGH BE9KIJIJIJ : 7 Memorial Park Station 180, 686, ARTS 10, 40 L J 9 7 BE9KIJIJ D D E7A
    [Show full text]
  • RTD Director Map District A
    Globeville Cole Clayton Northeast Park Hill W 32ND AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD UV35 West Highland 25 30th / Downing Station ¨¦§ 30TH AV Highland NDOWNING ST DELGANY ST BLAKE ST I E 29TH AVE W 29TH AVE WALNUT ST Whittier N SPEER BLVD LARIMER ST CENTRAL ST 28TH ST 0 0.3 0.6 LAWRENCEARAPAHOE ST ST 30th - Downing Station North Park Hill Stapleton N CLAY ST NCLAY Five Points CHAMPA ST Skyland Miles 22ND ST 29th St - Welton Station E 26TH AVE Union Station E 26TH AVE E 26TH AVENUE PKWY STOUT ST 18TH ST 27th St - Welton Station 25TH AV MARKET ST E 24TH AVE WATER ST Union Station 20TH ST E 24TH AVE RTD Director SloanW 23RD Lake AVE 19TH ST 25th St - Welton Station E 23RD AVE Jefferson Park NSYRACUSE ST Districts 15TH ST CALIFORNIAWELTON ST ST NFRANKLIN ST TREMONT PL MONTVIEW BD E 20TH AVE E MONTVIEW BLVD YOSEMITEN ST Pepsi Center - Elitch Gardens Station CURTIS ST17TH ST MOLINEST 20th St - Welton Station ST DAYTON Auraria E 19TH AVE 13TH ST City Park South Park Hill E 18TH AVE NSTEELE ST INVESCO Field at Mile High Station North Capitol Hill E 17TH AVE 17TH AV CBD E 17TH AVENUE PKWY 14TH ST E 17TH AVE City Park West 13TH ST E 16TH AVE Legend West Colfax AURARIA PKWY East Colfax NBROADWAY 40 YOSEMITEST LightRail Stations Auraria West Station ¤£40 ¤£40 ¤£ X" NJOSEPHINE ST NMONACO STREET PKWY E 14TH AVE NOSAGE ST N YORKN ST W 14TH AVE ST PEORIA NLOGAN ST ParkNRides HAVANA ST HAVANA Sun Valley W 13TH AVE E 13TH AVE NQUEBEC ST Cheesman Park NDOWNING ST NLINCOLN ST NSTEELE ST COUNTIES Capitol Hill DecaturNDECATUR ST - Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Art Guide a Tour of Metro’S Artwork Metro Commissions Artists to Create Engaging and Thought-Provoking Artworks to Make Your Journey More Inviting and Pleasurable
    metro.net Art Guide A tour of Metro’s artwork Metro commissions artists to create engaging and thought-provoking artworks to make your journey more inviting and pleasurable. The artworks weave a multi-layered cultural tapestry that mirrors Los Angeles County’s rich contemporary and popular cultures. Established in 1989, the Metro Art program has commissioned over 250 artists for a wide variety of both temporary and permanent projects. explore Artists are selected through a peer review process with community input; all works are created especially for their transit related sites. This guide is intended to help you discover artworks throughout the Metro system. For more detailed information on the artwork and the artists, please visit metro.net/art. Artwork copyrighted, all rights reserved. Metro Lines and Transitways Metro Contents Art’s a Trip. Art’s a Trip Metro Environments Free Metro Rail Tours Tours are o=ered the >rst Saturday, > Thursdays – Meet at 7pm at Sunday and Thursday of each month. the street level entrance to the Metro Rail Metro Customer Center It’s free. It’s provocative. The tours are roundtrip and last Hollywood/Highland Metro l Metro Red Line Metro Vehicles It’s a great ride. approximately two hours. Rail Station. Union Station Bus Plaza l Metro Purple Line Tours for groups of 15 or more are > Saturdays – Meet at 10am at > Each tour is unique, visits l Metro Gold Line Metro Headquarters available by special arrangement. the street level entrance to the di=erent stations and is led Metro Division 3 Hollywood/Highland Metro by a member of the Metro Art l Metro Blue Line Call 213 .922.2738 for information Rail Station.
    [Show full text]
  • M E M O R a N D U M Gold Line Grade-Separation
    Attachment A – Nelson/Nygaard Memorandum Report M E M O R A N D U M To: Fred Dock and Bahman Janka From: Paul Moore and Steve Boland Date: February 6, 2018 Subject: City Funding Request to Metro (SR-710 Early Action Projects) This memorandum briefly describes the projects the City of Pasadena Department of Transportation is proposing to include in the City’s SR-710 Early Action Projects funding request to Metro. The projects were selected based on: . review of the SR-710 North Environmental Impact Report/Statement (EIR/EIS); . recommendations of the SR-710 Working Group; . other existing City plans, including the Mobility Element of the General Plan; . additional project development by City staff; . Nelson\Nygaard evaluation; . discussions with representatives of the Cities of South Pasadena and Alhambra; and . discussions with the Transportation Advisory Commission in its October 26 meeting. Consistent with Metro direction, many of the proposed projects are Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management (TSM/TDM) projects, while others are multimodal in nature. Many of the projects are in advanced stages of project development or are part of adopted policies, while others are newer concepts requiring further community discussion and project development (note that cost estimates for these projects are by necessity preliminary, based on professional judgment). The projects are presented in no particular order. Given the scale of funding available, it is our hope that most if not all projects can be funded by Metro. GOLD LINE GRADE-SEPARATION This project would consist of grade-separation of the existing at-grade Metro Rail Gold Line crossing at California Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • 992 Metro Time Schedule & Line Route
    992 metro time schedule & line map 992 Expo Line to Edmonds View In Website Mode The 992 metro line (Expo Line to Edmonds) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Expo Line to Edmonds: 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM (2) Expo Line to King George: 12:09 AM - 11:59 PM (3) Expo Line to Lougheed Town Centre: 12:54 AM - 1:11 AM (4) Expo Line to New Westminster: 12:41 AM - 1:31 AM (5) Expo Line to Production Way-University: 12:04 AM - 11:54 PM (6) Expo Line to Waterfront: 12:01 AM - 11:58 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 992 metro station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 992 metro arriving. Direction: Expo Line to Edmonds 992 metro Time Schedule 13 stops Expo Line to Edmonds Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM Waterfront Station 439 Granville St, Vancouver Tuesday 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM Burrard Station Wednesday 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM 625 Burrard St, Vancouver Thursday 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM Granville Station Friday 8:59 AM - 10:11 AM 586 Dunsmuir Street, Vancouver Saturday Not Operational Stadium-Chinatown Station 590 Beatty St, Vancouver Main Street-Science World Station 1399 Main St, Vancouver 992 metro Info Direction: Expo Line to Edmonds Commercial-Broadway Station Stops: 13 1715 East Broadway, Vancouver Trip Duration: 23 min Line Summary: Waterfront Station, Burrard Station, Nanaimo Station Granville Station, Stadium-Chinatown Station, Main 2450 E 24th Av, Vancouver Street-Science World Station, Commercial-Broadway Station, Nanaimo Station, 29th Avenue Station, 29th Avenue
    [Show full text]