Paul Lyrene , Plant Breeding Professor (Retired); Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida IFAS, Gainesville, FL Talk Outline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paul Lyrene , Plant Breeding Professor (Retired); Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida IFAS, Gainesville, FL Talk Outline Blueberries and Blueberry Biology Paul Lyrene , Plant Breeding Professor (retired); Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida IFAS, Gainesville, FL Talk Outline • Growing back-yard blueberries in Sarasota County • Blueberry biology and ecology • Commercial blueberry production worldwide • Other potential back-yard fruit crops for this area Growing a few blueberries in your back yard in Sarasota • Recommended varieties: Emerald, Jewel, Sharpblue, Kestrel, Snowchaser, Flicker; Plant two or more varieties for cross-pollination • Acid soils, pH below 5.5, good drainage, often planted on beds of soil mixed with Canadian peat. • pH can be lowered with elemental sulfur (1 Lb per 100 square feet) • Low-pH irrigation water –rain barrel water • Full sun to partial shade, far from the roots of broadleaf trees (farther than the tree is tall). • Mulch with pine straw (or pine bark) • Fertilize lightly 6 times/year during growing season • Let the birds eat the fruit or put on a light net • Plants flower in February, ripen April and May Blueberry Classification • Family: Ericaceae: Vaccinium = blueberries; Gaylussacia = huckleberries; Erica = Heath, Rhododendron, Lyonia, Mountain laurel, • Genus Vaccinium: 400 species worldwide; all make edible berries. • Center of origin of Vaccinium: tropical highlands • Center of origin of section Cyanococcus, the blueberries most important in world agriculture: eastern North America Vaccinium species important in world commerce: • Section Cyanococcus blueberries: Lowbush, highbush, and rabbiteye blueberries: native in eastern North America • Cranberries: Wisconsin, Mass. (Native in eastern North America) • Lingonberry: Sweden, Norway, Russia, Alaska • Bilberry: northern Europe, Alaska, Canada- gathered from the forest; valued for tart, intensely blue flesh Bilberry and Lingonberry forest, Norway Fruit market with bilberry, Bergen, Norway Some blueberry biology • The 400 species of blueberries existing today are all descendants of one species that lived about 50 million years ago in mountainous areas north of Australia • The various groups of blueberries (cranberries, lingonberries, bilberries, sparkleberries, deerberries, section Cyanococcus blueberries) represent different evolutionary branches from the original species. • Each of these branches has many sub-branches Section Cyanococcus blueberries • Originally found only in eastern North America • Includes three commercially-important groups: lowbush blueberries of NE U.S. and S.E. Canada; rabbiteye blueberry from north Florida; highbush blueberry native from Lake Okeechobee to Nova Scotia • Also contains 20 wild species, 7 of which occur naturally in Florida • Despite greatly different appearances, many of the section Cyanococcus blueberries can be hybridized to make perfectly-fertile offspring • This fact has allowed breeders to develop cultivars with a wide range of adaptations and characteristics Vaccinium darrowii: Florida native lowbush blueberry North-South Adaptation of native Vaccinium corymbosum • Many woody plants that are native in eastern North America have a long north-south range (Highbush blueberry, red maple, red mulberry, dogwood, persimmon, hackberry). • A plant from New Jersey will not grow in Florida even if the same species is native in Florida. • Differences in chilling requirement are one important reason, but are only the tip of the adaptational iceberg. • Highbush blueberries from New Jersey are deciduous and have a high chilling requirement. • Highbush blueberries from Highlands County Florida are almost evergreen and have no chilling requirement. Blueberry Reproduction • Most woody plants are cross-pollinated; they have various methods of preventing close inbreeding. • Some are dioecious (holly, wax myrtle, eastern redcedar), some are monoecious (oaks, hickory, pines), some have perfect flowers but are self incompatible. • Wild blueberries have perfect flowers but are self-incompatible. • Cultivars are somewhat more self-fertile but it is best to mix two or more varieties Blueberry propagation Methods: • Seeds, division, stem cuttings, root cuttings, in-vitro tissue cultures, grafting • Blueberries of almost every species are extremely easy to grow from seed but almost nobody can do it. • Commercial blueberry varieties do not come true to seed, but most seedlings are quite good. Breeding new blueberry cultivars • The fact that blueberries grown from seed are extremely variable is the key to breeding new varieties. • If you choose the best seedling and propagate it with cuttings, it retains its superiority. • The task of the breeder is to breed better parents so that when they are crossed, they produce seedlings of exceptionally high quality. Getting better parents by recurrent selection: This is the key to all plant breeding • Start with the 200 best plants you can find • Use them to make 100 crosses • Grow 100 seedlings from each cross, and from the 10,000 seedlings, chose the best 200 plants. • Repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat……… History of Blueberry Production • Blueberries were gathered from the forest by native Americans • 1893-1940: 2000 acres of rabbiteye blueberries planted in north Florida using wild plants dug from the Yellow River in west Florida • 1916 First improved highbush blueberry varieties released by USDA for New Jersey • 1948 Ralph Sharpe began breeding Florida- adapted highbush blueberries for Florida • 1976: first low-chill highbush cultivars released from UF: Sharpblue and Flordablue • 1983: first year fresh blueberries were available in NYC earlier than May 20. Florida grower got $5 per pound compared to 50 cents for pick-your-own • $70 million per year: current value of Florida blueberry crop World Production of Highbush blueberries 1977: 120 million pounds, 95% from North America 38 Years later: 2015: 1,200 million pounds, 50% from North America Reasons for growth in Blueberry production • New varieties and production in southern hemisphere extended the season; formerly May 20 to August 20, now 365 days of the year. • Blueberries are popular with consumers: easy to eat, health benefits • Harvest and packinghouse advancements • Long post-harvest life New Project: Breeding deerberries • Deerberries (Vaccinium stamineum) are native throughout most of Florida • They have large fruit, high yields, potentially good flavor, grow well on scrubland and high pine land (Rosemary and Turkey oak land) • They have never been domesticated • Why? Bitter fruit, hard to propagate true-to- type • The main reason: nobody has worked on them Other possible fruits for Florida • Greening-tolerant citrus: • Mandarin: Fall Glow and Sugarbelle • Grapefruit: Jackson and Triumph • Kumquat: grafted on to Poncirus rootstock Figs • Variety: Brown Turkey • Plant near cement foundation • Mulch heavily with pinestraw • Fertilize and water lots • Fruit ripe July and August • Black Mulberries: get a low-chill variety Strawberries • Plant in October • Harvest December through May Japanese Persimmon • Various astringent and nonastringent varieties • Tanenashi, Fuyu and others • Grafted onto native American rootstock, Diospyros virginiana Blackberries and Raspberries • Ocklawaha and Florida Grand dewberries • Brazos and Tupe blackberries • Mysore tropical black raspberry Apples • Anna and Dorsett Golden • Squirrels and summer fruit rot Other Potential Crops • Banana: Dwarf Cavendish • Pineapples: racoons love them • Avocadoes: Laurel wilt an impending problem • Grapes: google: edis.ifas.ufl.edu • Jujube: Zizyphus jujuba Chinese Jujube: Zizyphus jujuba.
Recommended publications
  • Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species Through Southeastern
    Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States June and July 2007 Glassy Mountain, South Carolina Participants: Kim E. Hummer, Research Leader, Curator, USDA ARS NCGR 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521 phone 541.738.4201 [email protected] Chad E. Finn, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, Oregon 97330 phone 541.738.4037 [email protected] Michael Dossett Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97330 phone 541.738.4038 [email protected] Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crops through the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements:................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Part I – Southeastern United States ...................................................................................... 5 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 Travelog May-June 2007.................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions for part 1 .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moorhead Ph 1 Final Report
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Ecological Assessment of a Wetlands Mitigation Bank August 2001 (Phase I: Baseline Ecological Conditions and Initial Restoration Efforts) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin K. Moorhead, Irene M. Rossell, C. Reed Rossell, Jr., and James W. Petranka 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Departments of Environmental Studies and Biology University of North Carolina at Asheville Asheville, NC 28804 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Research and Special Programs Administration May 1, 1994 – September 30, 2001 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, through the Center for Transportation and the Environment, NC State University. 16. Abstract The Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank, the first wetlands mitigation bank in the Blue Ridge Province of North Carolina, was created to compensate for losses resulting from highway projects in western North Carolina. The overall objective for the Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank has been to restore the functional and structural characteristics of the wetlands. Specific ecological restoration objectives of this Phase I study included: 1) reestablishing site hydrology by realigning the stream channel and filling drainage ditches; 2) recontouring the floodplain by removing spoil that resulted from creation of the golf ponds and dredging of the creek; 3) improving breeding habitat for amphibians by constructing vernal ponds; and 4) reestablishing floodplain and fen plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia).
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization and Introgression Between Deerberries and Blueberries: Problems and Progress Paul M
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine North American Blueberry Research and Extension Proceeding Papers Workers Conference Aug 14th, 9:30 AM - 9:50 AM Hybridization and introgression between deerberries and blueberries: Problems and progress Paul M. Lyrene University of Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/nabrew2018 Lyrene, Paul M., "Hybridization and introgression between deerberries and blueberries: Problems and progress" (2018). North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference. 9. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/nabrew2018/proceedingpapers/proceedingpapers/9 This Proceeding Paper is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hybridization and Introgression between Deerberries and Blueberries: Problems and Progress Paul Lyrene, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Abstract: Several hundred F1 Vaccinium intersectional hybrids were produced between sections Cyanococcus and Polycodium. Tetraploid highbush blueberry cultivars (section Cyanococcus hybrids based on V. corymbosum) were the seed parents and colchicine-induced tetraploids of tall-growing (2-5m) deerberry plants (Vaccinium stamineum) from north-central Florida served as the pollen parents. Nine selected F1 hybrids were backcrossed to highbush cultivars, and more than 2,000 of the resulting BC1 seedlings were evaluated in field nurseries. Fifty-seven of the most vigorous BC1 seedlings were selected. Some were transplanted to 20-liter pots, others to a field with drip irrigation at 1 m x 3 m spacing. All were evaluated a year later for plant and berry characteristics after open pollination.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinium Virgatum 'Premier'
    Next generation sequencing of rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum ‘Premier’) and transcriptome comparisons to blueberry genomic resources Tim Rinehart 810 Highway 26 West [email protected] USDA-ARS, Southern Horticultural Laboratory Poplarville, MS 39470 228-224-2666 Abstract Tissues that were collected from Vaccinium virgatum ‘Premier’ for transcriptome analyses. Vaccinium virgatum (syn V. ashei) is commonly known as rabbiteye blueberry and native to the Southeastern United States. Cultivars are typically grown from North Carolina south to Florida and west to Texas for commercial blueberry production. In the Southeast, plants exhibit superior environmental tolerance and have fewer disease and insect concerns that highbush varieties (Vaccinium corymbosum), although some southern highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum x Vaccinium darrowii ) include V. virgatum in their genetic backgrounds. Extensive genomic work has been done on V. corymbosum, both diploid and tetraploid, but not much has been done with V. virgatum, which is hexaploid. Our study included five V. virgatum cultivars; TifBlue, Climax, PowderBlue, Austin, and Premier. Tissues were collected and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen from clonally propagated plants for each cultivar at multiple developmental stages including buds, berries, leaves, and roots. Tissue was also collected from root and leaves roots during drought treatments. First sequencing results were produced for several growth stages of ‘Premier’ using Nextera Total RNA kit and Illumina MiSeq instruments. Transcriptomes were compared to existing genomic resources for highbush. Rabbiteye Blueberry Breeding started by George Darrow in the 1930s for Vaccinium virgatum blueberry production in the southeast. Cultivars show V. ashei RNAseq Ann Loraine syn. improved heat, drought, poor soil tolerance and disease Can we use the diploid V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Vaccinium in North America
    Agriculture Canada The Genus Vaccinium 630 . 4 C212 P 1828 North America 1988 c.2 Agriculture aid Agri-Food Canada/ ^ Agnculturo ^^In^iikQ Canada V ^njaian Agriculture Library Brbliotheque Canadienno de taricakun otur #<4*4 /EWHE D* V /^ AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada/ '%' Agrrtur^'AgrntataireCanada ^M'an *> Agriculture Library v^^pttawa, Ontano K1A 0C5 ^- ^^f ^ ^OlfWNE D£ W| The Genus Vaccinium in North America S.P.VanderKloet Biology Department Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1828 1988 'Minister of Suppl) andS Canada ivhh .\\ ailabla in Canada through Authorized Hook nta ami other books! or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Catalogue No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data VanderKloet,S. P. The genus Vaccinium in North America (Publication / Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1828) Bibliography: Cat. No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 I. Vaccinium — North America. 2. Vaccinium — North America — Classification. I. Title. II. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. III. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1828. QK495.E68V3 1988 583'.62 C88-099206-9 Cover illustration Vaccinium oualifolium Smith; watercolor by Lesley R. Bohm. Contract Editor Molly Wolf Staff Editors Sharon Rudnitski Frances Smith ForC.M.Rae Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/genusvacciniuminOOvand
    [Show full text]
  • Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
    I -1 Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida I, I Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum • Bitterweed Helenium amarum • Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. B Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia BNolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia § Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum • Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis B Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus • Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia B Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia • § Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. B • Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) BRa gweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia • Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia BSpanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus • • Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra • Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) § Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata • Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) • Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) BScrub Palmetto Sabal etonia • Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • The SP Vander Kloet Vaccinium Collections11 This
    337 REVIEW / SYNTHÈSE Beyond botany to genetic resource preservation: the S.P. Vander Kloet Vaccinium collections1 Kim E. Hummer, Andrew R. Jamieson, and Ruth E. Newell Abstract: Sam P. Vander Kloet, botanist, traveled the world examining and obtaining specimens to redefine infrageneric taxonomic units within Vaccinium L., family Ericaceae. Besides his botanical treatises, his legacy includes herbarium voucher specimens and ex situ genetic resource collections including a seed bank and living plant collections at the Agricul- ture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada; the K.C. Irving Environmental Science Centre and Harriet Irving Botanical Gardens, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada; the Canadian Clonal Genebank, Harrow, Ontario, Canada; and the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germ- plasm Repository, Corvallis, Oregon, United States. Sam P. Vander Kloet’s collections include representatives of wild Erica- ceae with special emphasis on collections of North American and subtropical endemic Vaccinium species. These reference collections are significant and represent a lifetime of dedicated research. Representatives of his heritage collections have now been deposited not only in American genebanks (in Canada and the United States) but also in the World Genebank in Svalbard, Norway, for long term conservation and future evaluation of Vaccinium for the service of humanity. The bequest of his wild collected germplasm will continue to be available to facilitate utilization of an extended Vaccinium gene pool for development and breeding throughout the world. Key words: germplasm conservation, blueberry, genetics, genebanks, plant exploration. Résumé : Sam P. Vander Kloet, botaniste, a voyagé à travers le monde en examinant et obtenant des spécimens pour redéfi- nir les unités taxonomiques infragénériques au sein des Vaccinium L., famille des Ericaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum to the Guide to the Natural Communities of the Delaware Estuary
    ADDENDUM TO THE UIDE TO THE ATURAL OMMUNITIES G N C OF THE DELAWARE ESTUARY SEPTEMBER0 2009 Citation: Largay, E. and L. Sneddon. 2009. Addendum to the Guide to the Ecological Systems and Vegetation Communities of the Delaware Estuary. NatureServe. Arlington, Virginia. Partnership for the Delaware Estuary, Report #09-XX. 112 pp. PDE Report No. 09-XX Copyright © 2009 NatureServe COVER PHOTOS Top L: Overwash Dunes, photo from Delaware Natural Heritage Program Top R: Coastal Plain Muck Pondshore, photo by Kathleen Strakosch Walz, New Jersey Natural Heritage Program Bottom L: Dry Oak Hickory Forest, photo by Tony Davis, Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Bottom R: Inland Dune and Ridge Forest/Woodland, Kathleen Strakosch Walz, New Jersey Natural Heritage Program ADDENDUM TO THE GUIDE TO THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF THE DELAWARE ESTUARY Ery Largay Lesley Sneddon September 2009 Acknowledgements: This work was made possible through funding from the Delaware Estuary Program (EPA 320 Funding). Kristin Snow and Mary Russo from NatureServe provided essential data management services to develop this report and report format. Robert Coxe and Bill McAvoy from the Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Kathleen Strakosch Walz from the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Tony Davis from the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Linda Kelly and Karl Anderson, independent botanists, provided ecological expertise, energy and insight. Mark Anderson and Charles Ferree from The Nature Conservancy developed ecological systems maps to accompany this work. Danielle Kreeger, Laura Whalen, and Martha-Maxwell Doyle from the Partnership for the Delaware Estuary provided support and guidance throughout this project. We thank everyone who helped us with this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT LIN, YING-CHEN. Improved
    ABSTRACT LIN, YING-CHEN. Improved and Novel Resources for Blueberry Mapping and Genomics. (Under the direction of Dr. Allan Brown.) Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) is an economically important small fruit crop (564.4 million pounds harvested in the U.S. with a value of $850.9 million in 2012), but relatively few genomic resources are available to researchers and breeders for the purposes of plant improvement. Traditional blueberry breeding is constrained by severe inbreeding depression, the complex nature of the polyploidy genome (2n=24, 4n=48 and 6n=72), and a relatively long period of juvenility. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the development of bioinformatics tools to interpret this information, blueberry breeding efforts are likely to benefit from these technologies. With the exception of two much older RAPD-based maps (Rowland & Levi, 1994; Qu & Hancock, 1997), a map of diploid population [(Vaccinium darrowii Fla4B × Vaccinium corymbosum W85-20) F1 #10 × V. corymbosum W85-23] is the only published genetic linkage map of blueberry. However, two other maps of a tetraploid blueberry and an interspecific blueberry × sparkleberry population, are currently under construction. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) primer information from these genetic linkages maps, and one from cranberry, were used to position 43% of the current blueberry draft genome assembly. The draft assembly currently consists of over 9,000 scaffolds (greater than 2 K in length) with an N50 of 241 kb. The assembly was created through a combination of Roche 454 pyrosequencing, Illumina Hiseq and Sanger BAC-end sequencing. Multiple software programs were used to predict the genomic location of the markers and to provide alignment (and in some cases, orientation) of genomic scaffolding.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 'TO-1088' (Cutie Pie™): a New Dwarf Hybrid Blueberry for Home Gardens
    HORTSCIENCE 53(3):384–386. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12767-17 via its compact growth habit, dense flower- ing canopy, and desirable fall foliage color. ‘TO-1088’ (Cutie PieTM): A New Dwarf Hybrid Blueberry for Home Gardens Origin and Description ‘TO-1088’ was selected in 2007 at the D. Scott NeSmith1,2 UGA Griffin Campus in Griffin, GA, from Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia-Griffin Campus, Griffin, seedlings derived from open-pollinated GA 30223-1797 ‘MS-840’ (a nonpatented breeding line). ‘MS-840’ originated from a cross of ‘Blue- Additional index words. Vaccinium hybrid, fruit breeding, cultivar, edible, ornamental crisp’ (USPP 11033) · ‘Magnolia’ (a non- patented commercial cultivar), both of which have V. darrowii and V. virgatum in Blueberries are adapted to many areas late-season southern highbush (V. corymbo- their ancestry. ‘TO-1088’ was established across the southeastern United States, es- sum L. hybrids), around or before the time of in multiple plant plots at the UGA Blue- pecially those that contain genes from early ripening commercial rabbiteye blue- berry Research Farm in Alapaha and Grif- native species such as Vaccinium darrowii berry cultivars. The new cultivar offers fin, GA, in 2008 for testing and comparing Camp and the rabbiteye species Vaccinium considerable visual appeal for the consumer with commercial industry standards. It was virgatum Aiton (syn. Vaccinium ashei Reade). Vaccinium darrowii is typically compact in the wild and is often evergreen, whereas rabbiteye blueberries are typically deciduous and highly vigorous. Both V. darrowii and V. virgatum have been used for many years in breeding programs to develop hybrids adapted to the low-chill (<400 h below 7 °C) to mid-chill (400–800 h below 7 °C) regions of the southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]