DOCSLIB.ORG

Significant Natural Areas of the Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Significant Natural Areas of the Proposed IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Hearing 21A: Significant Natural Areas of the Proposed Waikato District Plan STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARIE-LOUISE (MIFFY) FOLEY For the Waikato Regional Council DATED 29 October 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Scope of Evidence ......................................................................................................... 3 3 Summary of evidence .................................................................................................... 4 4 Removal of the majority of SNA from the map overlay ................................................... 4 5 Significant habitats of indigenous fauna ....................................................................... 14 6 Removal of Policy 3.2.2 Recognise and identify ........................................................... 16 7 Inclusion of environmental compensation in Policy 3.2.3 Management hierarchy ......... 17 8 Policy 3.2.6 Providing for vegetation clearance ............................................................ 18 9 Other submission points ............................................................................................... 21 10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX ONE ................................................................................................................. 22 APPENDIX TWO ................................................................................................................ 23 Doc # 17448893 Page 2 1 Introduction 1.1 My name is Marie-Louise (Miffy) Foley. I am a Senior Policy Advisor in the Integration and Infrastructure Section at the Waikato Regional Council. I have been in this role since February 2019. 1.2 I hold the academic qualifications of a Bachelor of Sciences from the University of Waikato and a Graduate Diploma in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of New England in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. I am an intermediate Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute. 1.3 My role with Waikato Regional Council has been as a member of the Policy Implementation Team which involves working with the territorial authorities of the Waikato Region and with neighbouring regional councils to assist in the development of consistent integrated regional policy. I am also involved with Future Proof and a number of the Hamilton to Auckland Corridor Plan work streams. I represent Waikato Regional Council on the Future Proof Technical Implementation Group. 1.4 I have 15 years’ experience working in the planning field. Prior to my role with Waikato Regional Council, I was employed as a policy and strategic planner in local government in NSW for over 13 years. 1.5 I confirm that I am familiar with the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as set out in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014. I have read and agree to comply with the Code. Except where I state that I am relying upon the specified evidence or advice of another person, my evidence is within my area of expertise. I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions expressed. 2 Scope of Evidence 2.1 My evidence is given on behalf of Waikato Regional Council. 2.2 The submission made by Waikato Regional Council addressed a number of aspects of the proposed District Plan that relate to the significant natural area (SNA) provisions, both in support and opposition, and requested numerous amendments. These were to ensure that the proposed provisions are aligned with the Waikato Regional Policy Statement (RPS), particularly Chapter 11 Indigenous Biodiversity. Some of them also refer to the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 (NZCPS). I was not involved in Doc # 17448893 Page 3 the preparation of Waikato Regional Council’s submission, dated 18 September 2018. However, I led the preparation of the further submission, dated 15 July 2019. 2.3 I have read the s42A report prepared by Ms Chibnall as well as the Significant Natural Areas Assessments report dated 17 October 2020 prepared by Mr Turner. 2.4 My evidence reinforces the Waikato Regional Council submission and reflects my professional opinions as a resource management policy advisor. I also rely on the evidence of Dr Deng. The focus of my evidence is on: • Removal of SNAs that have not been ground truthed from map overlay; • Significant habitats of indigenous fauna, • Removal of Policy 3.2.2 Recognise and identify, • Inclusion of environmental compensation in Policy 3.2.3 Management hierarchy, and • Policy 3.2.6 Providing for vegetation clearance. 3 Summary of evidence 3.1 I do not support the s42A report recommendation to remove the majority of SNA from the planning maps and instead rely on the criteria for an SNA contained in Appendix 2 of the proposed plan due to the inaccuracy of the SNA mapping. 3.2 For much of the District’s significant indigenous biodiversity this is maintaining the status quo approach which I do not believe gives effect to the RPS, particularly Section 11 of the RPS which seeks to address declining biodiversity through policies and implementation methods aimed at maintaining or enhance indigenous biodiversity. 3.3 As highlighted in Dr Deng’s evidence, Mr Turner’s report is not adequately robust or comprehensive to be used as the basis for a decision of this magnitude. Further, the plan is progressing through a comprehensive consultation process as per Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), in addition to the multiple opportunities for landowners to be involved in the lead up to the notification of the plan. 3.4 In my experience, plan mapping is a representation of reality rather than a confirmation of the exact location of an item or area on the ground. I note that recent approaches of District Plans notified under the NZ planning standards contain terms Doc # 17448893 Page 4 and conditions to address this matter. The Panel could consider a similar approach here. 3.5 The implications of having a SNA inaccurately identified on a property are minor or could be mitigated to an extent by permitted activity standards. The notified version of Stage 1 was publicly notified on 18 July 2018 and from that date, the rules relating to SNA have had legal effect since Stage 1 was publicly notified on 18 July 2018. It would be useful for the Council to clarify how the notified rule framework has been working and if any issues with the identification of SNAs have been addressed through the consent process. 3.6 As outlined in Dr Deng’s evidence, there are significant risks associated with not showing SNA sites on the planning map in terms of potential further loss of biodiversity across the District. Identifying SNAs on the plan maps provides a clear and certain way of addressing a matter of national importance under the RMA. Not mapping SNAs places a more onerous requirement on landowners who wish to clear or modify indigenous vegetation under permitted activity standards as each one will need to engage specialist ecological services to assess the vegetation which I do not believe would be efficient or effective in meeting Objectives 3.1.1 and 3.2.1 of the Plan of as per the s32 of the RMA. 3.7 Including the mapping in the proposed district plan is preferred as it: (a) ensures that the SNAs are ‘identified’ as per the RPS. (b) is clearer and more targeted than the operative plan which hasn’t necessarily protected SNAs. (c) is more cost effective to fund targeted assessment than assess larger areas. (d) removes uncertainty and unnecessary costs for those outside of mapped areas. 3.8 The Panel could consider a variation to the proposed district plan to allow for this refinement to be completed and then add the mapping to the plan at a later date. I understand that the NPS IB is currently ‘pending approval’ and likely to be released in April 2021 which would allow incorporation of NPS requirements at the same time. 3.9 Further, should the Panel retain the SNA mapping as requested, I request that they also provide a mechanism to manage areas that meet the WRPS 11A criteria and have not been identified and mapped in the Proposed Plan as per WRC submission point 81.20. Doc # 17448893 Page 5 3.10 In relation to identified areas of significant habitat of indigenous fauna, there is the opportunity to include additional matters of control and matters of discretion to ensure that habitat that meets Criterion 3 is considered when activities are proposed that might impact that habitat. This is particularly relevant in relation to bat habitat given the known long tailed bat population within the Waikato District. 3.11 As with my position on the mapping, I request that Policy 3.2.2 Recognise and identify be retained but with amendments to address Ms Chibnall’s concerns about cross- referencing to the RPS. This policy is giving effect to Policy 11.2 of the RPS which in turn addresses the requirements of s6(c) of the RMA to protect areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitat of indigenous fauna in terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine environments. 3.12 Ms Chibnall has recommended an additional subclause to allow for environmental compensation but noted that it would be beneficial for WRC to provide comment on environmental compensation in light of RPS subclause 11.1.8 (b) Plan Development which states
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pre-Fabricated Homes Investment Prospectus
    Pre-fabricated Homes South Waikato District Investment Prospectus Council Nau mai, haere mai WEL COME From the Mayor Dear Investor, we are proud to present our District to you as you consider where in New Zealand to establish an offsite pre-fabricated home manufacturing facility. Since the early 1890s with native timber processing in Putāruru, through to the establishment of commercial forests of Pinus radiata in the 1920s and the building of the Kinleith Timber, Paper and Pulp Mill in 1954, the South Waikato has been at the forefront of technological innovations in timber processing. Timber is in the DNA of our people and communities, who are both ready and able to support your development. South Waikato District Mayor Jenny Shattock From the Chair (SWIFT) The South Waikato Investment Fund Trust (SWIFT) believes that Putāruru is an outstanding location to establish a large scale manufacturing facility. Financially the low cost of land, proximity to raw materials and labour, coupled with direct road and rail links makes for a compelling business case. The social impact of this kind of investment would be transformational, both directly and indirectly, accelerating the delivery of inclusive growth for one of New Zealand’s most progressive Districts. Ian Elliott, SWIFT Chairperson From the SWDC Chief Executive The South Waikato has a plentiful supply of low cost land, located on State Highway one, within two and a half hours’* drive time of over half of New Zealand’s population. With direct rail links to the Port of Tauranga and beyond, importing and exporting is simple and cost effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Heading/Title Aquatic Pest Report 2019
    Aquatic Pest Report 2019 Bay of Plenty Regional Council Environmental Publication 2019/03 FebruaryHeading/title 2019 PreparedSubheading by Freya Ewing and Thomas Bailey (Summer Students) 5Month Quay YearStreet P O Box 364 WhakatānePrepared by NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175-9372 (Print) ISSN: 1179-9471 (Online) Cover photo: Rowan Wells (NIWA) Acknowledgements We would like to thank Hamish Lass, Biosecurity Officer for his support and guidance, and Lucas MacDonald, Biosecurity Officer for his assistance and advice across all advocacy work. Our acknowledgements also go to Greg Corbett and the remainder of the Biosecurity Team at the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, we are grateful for the encouragement and support we received from all of you. We would also like to show our gratitude to Geoff Ewert for his continued commitment to the Rotorua Lakes, in particular with fixing weed cordons and the running of the boat wash station. We are also immensely grateful to Sarah Van Der Boom from Freshwater Biosecurity Partnership Program for her help with data collection. Lastly, we would like to thank Sam Beaumont and the remainder of the team at Ministry for Primary Industries, for the supplying of merchandise and collateral, signage and guidance. BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL TOI MOANA 1 Executive summary Many of New Zealand’s most well-known lakes and rivers can be found in the Bay of Plenty region and are therefore known to attract significant visitor numbers annually. The preservation and protection of these waterways are what attracts so many international and domestic tourists to them. Due to the close proximity of the Bay of Plenty lakes and rivers, and their popularity, they are extremely susceptible to invasive pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato 2070
    WAIKATO 2070 WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Growth & Economic Development Strategy 2 3 Waikato 2070 Waikato WELCOME TO THE WAIKATO DISTRICT CONTENTS The Waikato District Council Growth & Economic Development Strategy WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL: GROWTH & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DISTRICT GROWTH DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: & ECONOMIC WAIKATO (Waikato 2070) has been developed to provide guidance on appropriate 01.0 Introduction 4 growth and economic development that will support the wellbeing of the district. 02.0 Our Opportunities 13 This document has been prepared using the Special Consultative Procedure, Section 83, of the Local Government Act (2002). 03.0 Focus Areas 19 WHAT IS THE GROWTH STRATEGY? 04.0 Our Towns 25 A guiding document that the Waikato District Council uses to inform how, where and when growth occurs in the district over the next 50-years. The growth indicated in Waikato 2070 has been informed by in-depth analysis 05.0 Implementation 43 and combines economic, community and environmental objectives to create liveable, thriving and connected communities. The growth direction within Waikato 2070 will ultimately inform long-term planning and therefore affect 06.0 Glossary 46 social, cultural, economic and environmental wellbeing. WHAT DOES IT COVER? The strategy takes a broad and inclusive approach to growth over the long term, taking into account its economic, social, environmental, cultural and physical dimensions. Waikato 2070 is concerned with the growth and development of communities throughout the district, including rural and urban environments. Adopted by Waikato District Council 19 May 2020. VERSION: 16062020 REGION WIDE Transport connections side/collector main/arterial highway (state highways, arterials, rail) Future mass-transit stations rail and station short-term medium/long-term (and connections into Auckland, Hamilton, Waipa) Industrial Clusters Creative Ind.
    [Show full text]
  • 201102 CCL Open Agenda
    1 Agenda for a meeting of the Waikato District Council to be held in the Council Chambers, District Office, 15 Galileo Street, Ngaruawahia on MONDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2020 commencing at 9.30am. Information and recommendations are included in the reports to assist the Council in the decision-making process and may not constitute Council’s decision or policy until considered. 1. APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE 2. CONFIRMATION OF STATUS OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.1 Minutes of a Council meeting held on 21 September 2020 5 4.2 Minutes of an Extraordinary Council meeting held on 28 September 2020 12 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS 5.1 Policy & Regulatory Committee Committee Recommendations to Council – 12 October 2020 16 5.2 Strategy & Finance Committee Committee Recommendations to Council – 13 October 2020 17 6. REPORTS 6.1 Zero Harm Update 18 6.2 Mana Whenua Forums 24 6.3 Maaori Wards 28 6.4 Delegations to Watercare Services Limited 40 6.5 Council and Committee 2021 Meeting Calendar 48 6.6 Sale of Vehicle – 2017 Toyota Highlander KPT7 51 Waikato District Council 1 Agenda: 2 November 2020 2 7. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC 55 GJ Ion CHIEF EXECUTIVE Waikato District Council 2 Agenda: 2 November 2020 3 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND DELEGATION Chairperson: His Worship the Mayor Deputy Chairperson: Deputy Mayor Membership: The Mayor and all Councillors Meeting frequency: Six weekly – or as required Quorum: Half of the members (including vacancies) Purpose 1. To provide leadership to, and advocacy on behalf of, the people of the Waikato District.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua Economy – Early Estimates for Rotorua Lakes District Council
    Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua Economy – Early Estimates for Rotorua Lakes District Council April 2020 Authorship This report was prepared by Rob Hayes with assistance from Gareth Kiernan and Dr Adolf Stroombergen. Email: [email protected] All work and services rendered are at the request of, and for the purposes of the client only. Neither Infometrics nor any of its employees accepts any responsibility on any grounds whatsoever, including negligence, to any other person or organisation. While every effort is made by Infometrics to ensure that the information, opinions, and forecasts are accurate and reliable, Infometrics shall not be liable for any adverse consequences of the client’s decisions made in reliance of any report provided by Infometrics, nor shall Infometrics be held to have given or implied any warranty as to whether any report provided by Infometrics will assist in the performance of the client’s functions. 3 Economic impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua economy – April 2020 Table of contents Executive Summary ........................................................................5 Introduction ...................................................................................... 7 The greatest economic shock in living memory ..................................................................7 Modelling of the impacts of COVID-19 are based on key assumptions ....................... 8 The Level 4 lockdown has rocked the Rotorua economy ... 10 Consumer spending has fallen off a cliff ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Pest Plants
    REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY © Crown Copyright 2010 145 Contract Report No. 2075 REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, J. 1885: On the botany of Te Aroha Mountain. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 17: 275-281 Allaby, M. (ed) 1994: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 415 pp. Allan, H. H. 1982: Flora of New Zealand. Vol 1. Government Printer, Wellington. Allen, D.J. 1983: Notes on the Kaimai-Mamaku Forest Park. New Zealand Forest Service, Tauranga (unpublished). 20 p. Allen R.B. and McLennan M.J. 1983, Indigenous forest survey manual: two inventory methods. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 48. 73 pp. Allen R.B. 1992: An inventory method for describing New Zealand vegetation. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 181. 25 pp. Anon 1975: Biological reserves and forest sanctuaries. What’s New in Forest Research 21. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua. 4 p. Anon 1982: Species list from Kopurererua Stream. New Zealand Wildlife Service National Habitat Register, May 1982. Bay of Plenty Habitat sheets, Folder 2, records room, Rotorua Conservancy. Anon 1983a: Reserve proposals. Northern Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Background notes for SFSRAC Meeting and Inspection, 1983. Tauranga. 12 pp. Anon 1983b: The inadequacy of the ecological reserves proposed for the Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Joint campaign on Native Forests, Nelson. 14 p. plus 3 references. Anon 1983c: Overwhelming support to save the Kaimai-Mamaku. Bush Telegraph 12: 1-2. Wellington. Anon 1989: Conservation values of natural areas on Tasman Forestry freehold and leasehold land. Unpublished report for Tasman Forestry Ltd, Department of Conservation and Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Review
    1 Citation: Lowe, D.J. 2010. Quaternary volcanism, tephras, and tephra-derived soils in New Zealand: an introductory review. In: Lowe, D.J.; Neall, V.E., Hedley, M; Clothier, B.; Mackay, A. 2010. Guidebook for Pre-conference North Island, New Zealand „Volcanoes to Oceans‟ field tour (27-30 July). 19th World Soils Congress, International Union of Soil Sciences, Brisbane. Soil and Earth Sciences Occasional Publication No. 3, Massey University, Palmerston North, pp. 7-29. Quaternary volcanism, tephras, and tephra-derived soils in New Zealand: an introductory review David J. Lowe Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton Introduction This two-part article comprises brief introductions to (1) volcanism and its products in general and to the broad pattern of Quaternary volcanism and tephrostratigraphy in North Island, and (2) the ensuing tephra-derived soils of North Island. Part 1 derives mainly from Smith et al. (2006), Leonard et al. (2007), and Lowe (2008a). Other useful reviews include those of Neall (2001), Graham (2008: Chapter 7), Wilson et al. (2009), and Cole et al. (2010). Recent reviews on tephras include Shane (2000), Alloway et al. (2007), Lowe (2008b, 2011), and Lowe et al. (2008a, 2008b). A history of tephra studies in New Zealand was reported by Lowe (1990). Part 2 describes the distribution and character of the main tephra-derived soils, these being Entisols and Andisols (mostly Vitrands and Udands) and Ultisols (Lowe and Palmer, 2005). Books on these and other soils in New Zealand include NZ Soil Bureau (1968), Gibbs (1980), McLaren and Cameron (1996), Cornforth (1998), and Molloy and Christie (1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Accessing the Internet & Wifi in Your Community
    Welcome to the first edition of Digi Talk - brought to you by Waitomo District Council and Otorohanga District Council. This publication is aimed at keeping you informed about digital activity and events taking place across the King Country. Both Councils have adopted digital enablement plans that identify ways to achieve economic and social benefits from improved telecommunication infrastructure and to increase digital awareness and engagement of residents. SeniorNet Te Kuiti has a group Assessing your digital knowledge and skills of volunteer coaches and offers computer training for all ages. Technology and the digital environment is changing constantly. It can seem overwhelming to keep up with what Tablets, MYOB, Skype, mobile you ‘don’t know’. phones, laptops and more! Take advantage of the following free online tool. Complete a Annual membership $20.00 quick online assessment and you will receive an action plan Each 2-hour session $3.00 to help improve your digital knowledge and skills either in your business or personally. SeniorNet are always looking for more volunteers to join the team. Visit www.digitaljourney.org Digital webpage now live WDC’s website now includes information about new 51 King Street West, Te Kuiti telecommunication infrastructure developments, types of Phone 07-878 6200 internet connections available in the district and details of www.facebook.com/seniornet.tekuiti internet service providers to connect with. New telecommunications for the area Vodafone are building new telecommunication Accessing the internet & towers in Aria and Benneydale enabling broadband and mobile coverage to these areas. WiFi in your community An upgrade of the Vodafone tower in Kawhia will Do you need to check your emails, update your see the arrival of broadband services and 4G facebook status, access research resources or network.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Funding
    COMMUNITY FUNDING Community Funders What and website Purpose Who can apply? Districts Closing dates Community Organisation Grants COGS provides grants to non- Organisations Hauraki: All townships within the Around Scheme (COGS) profit community organisations - do not need to Hauraki and Thames-Coromandel May/June delivering community-based social be registered District Council boundaries. services. COGS grants support http://www.communitymatters.govt.nz/Fu charity Waikato West: organisation running costs, nding-and-grants---Crown-Funds--- All townships within the Waikato projects and events. Community-Organisation-Grants-Scheme and Matamata-Piako District Council boundaries. South Waikato: All townships within the Waipa, South Waikato, Otorohanga and Waitomo District Council boundaries. Tongariro: All townships within the Taupo and Ruapehu District Council boundaries. Creative Communities Scheme Projects that get funded do at Individuals and Every District Council. Check with least one of the following: groups District Council • encourage participation — they Do not need to be You apply to the District where the http://www.creativenz.govt.nz/find- create opportunities for local registered body project will take place. funding/funds/creative-communities- communities to engage with, scheme and participate in local arts activities • support diversity — they support the diverse artistic cultural traditions of local communities • enable young people — they enable young people (under 18 years) to engage with, and participate in the arts. First
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16
    BoPRC CF Bay of Plenty Regional Council 08-Dec-2017 Doc No. R001 Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 Final Results P:\605X\60545822\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60545822_BoPRC Summary of Final Results_20171208.docx Revision B – 08-Dec-2017 Prepared for – Bay of Plenty Regional Council – Co No.: N/A AECOM BoPRC CF Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 – Final Results Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 Final Results Client: Bay of Plenty Regional Council Co No.: N/A Prepared by AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Ltd Level 3, 80 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, PO Box 27277, Wellington 6141, New Zealand T +64 4 896 6000 F +64 4 896 6001 www.aecom.com 08-Dec-2017 Job No.: 60545822 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to ISO9001, ISO14001 AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited. All rights reserved. No use of the contents, concepts, designs, drawings, specifications, plans etc. included in this report is permitted unless and until they are the subject of a written contract between AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited (AECOM) and the addressee of this report. AECOM accepts no liability of any kind for any unauthorised use of the contents of this report and AECOM reserves the right to seek compensation for any such unauthorised use. Document Delivery AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited (AECOM) provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. AECOM considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s convenience and AECOM requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic information is maintained.
    [Show full text]