FIFTEENTHMEETING OFTHEIMSSTUDYGROUP'CANTUSPLANUS' DOBOGÓKİ,HUNGARY,AUGUST2329,2009 PROGRAM IMSSTUDYGROUP'CANTUSPLANUS'(foundedin1983) Chair:BarbaraHagghHuglo PastChairs:HelmutHucke,DavidHiley,RuthSteiner,CharlesAtkinson AdvisoryBoard:NicolasBell,JamesBorders,ChristelleCazauxKowalski,ZsuzsaCzagány,Roman Hankeln,DebraLacoste,ChristianTroelsgård LOCALARRANGEMENTS2009 Adviser:LászlóDobszay Secretary:BeátaMeszéna SUNDAYAugust23 10AM3PMMeetingattheConcertHallofthe'OldMusicAcademy'inBudapest 3PMBusleavesBudapestfromtheMusicAcademy 4PMArrivalinDobogókı,checkin,rest 6PM Opening session Chair:BarbaraHagghHuglo InvitedLecturer1:ChristianTroelsgård ChristianTroelsgård isAssociateProfessorattheSaxoInstituteoftheUniversityofCopenhagenandhas publishedonByzantineandonmedievaltopics(bibliography: http://forskning.ku.dk/search/ profil/publikationsliste/?personid=155896 ).Heservesassecretaryfortheenterprise MonumentaMusicae Byzantinae andasamemberoftheAdvisoryBoardoftheIMSStudyGroup'CantusPlanus'. Songsforthe Theotokos –PiecesofpapyrusandtheByzantine theotokia Marian troparia arewellrepresentedamongthefragmentsofearlyGreekchant textspreservedonpapyrussheets. Hypotēnsēneusplanchnian ,inLatinknownasthe Subtuumpraesidium ,isawellknownexample,sinceithasparallel transmissionsinotherchantfamilies.Otherearlytheotokia onpapyrusarefurnishedwith modalindications,andsomeappeartobefurnishedwithsignsthathavebeeninterpreted astracesofmusicalnotation.ThispaperwilladdresstheseearlyfragmentsofMarian asagroupandinvestigatetheirrelationshiptothe theotokia oflaterByzantine chantcollections. 8PMDinner MONDAYAugust24 Italy and France between East and West Chair:JamesBorders 9AMInvitedLecturer2:JosephDyer JosephDyer taughtmusichistoryattheUniversityofMassachusettsBostonuntilhisretirementin2001.Hisresearch interestshaveincludedvarioustopicsinthefieldsofmedievalchant,liturgy(especiallyintheMiddleAges), monasticism,performancepracticeandmedievalmusictheory.HeisaFellowoftheRoyalSchoolofChurchMusic. Hismostrecentpublicationsinclude: “Speculative Musica andtheMedievalUniversityof,” MusicandLetters 90(2009),177204. “ThePowerofMusicAccordingtoTwoMedievalPhilosophers,”in ‘Diesestletitie’:EssaysonChant inHonourofJankaSzendrei ,ed.DavidHileyandGáborKiss(BudapestRegensburgOttawa,2008), 21135. “BoySingersoftheRomanScholaCantorum,”in YoungChoristers,6501700 ,ed.SusanBoyntonand EricRice(Woodbridge:Boydell&Brewer,2008),1936. “RomanProcessionsoftheMajorLitany( litaniaemaiores )fromtheSixthtotheTwelfthCenturies,”in RomaFelix:FormationandReflectionsofMedievalRome ,ed.ÉamonnÓCarragainandCarolNeuman deVegvar(Aldershot:Ashgate,2007),11237. KatakosmēsontonnymphonasouSiōn—AdornathalamumtuumSion : EastandWestinthemedievalRomancelebrationofCandlemas BeginningasalocalcommemorationatJerusaleminthelatefourthcentury,by thebeginningoftheseventhcenturytheConstantinopolitanobservanceof Hypapante (westernCandlemas)hadtakenshapeasapenitentialprocessionfollowedbyaliturgyat thechurchofthe Theotokos intheBlachernaequarter.ItwasintroducedtoRome sometimeduringthelatterhalfoftheseventhcentury,thankstothepresenceinRomeof Greekspeakingclergyand.ThefirstmentionofaRomancelebrationofthefeast ‘ofStSimeon,whichthecall Ypapanti ’withaprocessionoccursinthe Liber pontificalis .ThereitislinkedwithareorganizationofMarianfeastsbyPopeSergiusI (687701).TheearliestmusicalrepertoryforthisandotherRomanprocessions,generally penitentialincharacter,maybepreservedintheseriesofsixteenintheOld Romangradual,BAV,vat.lat.5319. AfterthetimeofSergius,thefeasttookonastrongerMariancast,comingtobe knownasthe‘Purification’,thusreferringtotheritualtowhichMarysubmittedherself fortydaysafterJesus’sbirthinobediencetothelaw(Lk2:2239).Providing testimonytotheByzantineinfluenceontheRomancelebrationof Hypapante /Purification aretwoGreekchantsthatweretranslatedintoLatinas Adornathalamumtuum and Ave gratiaplena .TheyweregivenoriginalmusicalsettingsintheOldRomanchantidiom, thoughapparentlyrelyingonthestructureoftheirGreekmodels.Incorporatedinthe earliesttransmissionoftheRomanrepertorytotheCarolingians,thechantswererecast accordingtothestylisticcriteriaofFrankishsingers.Oneoftheearliestnorthern antiphonersofthe(MontBlandin,withoutnotation)hasbilingualversionsofthe chants,whoseLatintranscriptionsfollowdivergentprinciples. 9:30TerenceBailey Rome,Milanandtheconfractoria

Oftenmentionedcasuallyinthescholarlyliterature,insupportofwidelyheld assumptionsabouttherelationshipsbetweentheGallican,IberianandMilaneserites,the placeoftheAmbrosian confractoria inthesplendidtextureoftheLatinliturgyofthe Westhasbeenconsistentlymisunderstood. 9:55MichelHuglo(tobereadinEnglishbyBarbaraHagghHuglo) Observationssurlespiècesdeplainchanttraduitesdugrec DepuislarestaurationduplainchantauXIXesièclejusqu'audébutduXXIe siècle,plusieursmusicologuesontexaminélespiècesdechanttraduitesdugrecà différentesépoquesdel'histoire.Aujourd'hui,ilsemblenécessairedefairelasynthèse desrésultatsacquisparcesanalysespourdéterminerlesépoquesetleslieuxoùces traductionsfurententreprisesetenfinparquelleméthodeconcrètetextesetmélodies passèrentd'OrientenOccident. Leslieux:cesontlesgrandesmétropoleschrétiennesdubassinméditerranéenoù GrecsetLatinssecroisentetserencontrentpourdesmotifsdifférents:diplomatie, commerce,conciles. Lesépoques:àl'exceptiondu GloriainexcelsisDeo ,ilsemblebienqu'ilnereste aucunepiècetraduitedugrecantérieureauconciledeNicée(325).Lespiècescomposéés enOrientàl'époquedescontroversesthéologiquessurlesdeuxnaturesdanslapersonne deJésusChrist,nédeMarieTheotocos,sontdepeupostérieuresauxconcilesd'Ephèse (431)etdeChalcédoine(451):ainsi,l'antienne Subtuumpraesidium etlesantiennesdu 1erJanvier.Enfin,laQuerelledesimagesduVIIIesiècle,quicausal'immigrationde milliersdemoinesgrecsenItaliedusudetamena17ambassadesduàAixla Chapelle: Cheroubicon etHymneacathiste. Lesméthodes:Traductionparécritaveccorrectionsetaméliorationssuccessives. Traductionpartroiscollaborateurs:unlecteurdutextegrec,uninterprète,unscribequi noteauvollesmotsdutraducteur,avecousanslesfautesduesàdesconfusionsdemots: ex.l'antienne Subtuumpraesidium . Ilresteàexpliquerpourquoilesmélodiesdespiècestraduitesdiffèrentdes mélodiesgrecquesoriginales. 10:15Discussion 10:30CoffeeBreak

Basic Questions Chair:DavidHiley 11KateHelsen ‘Thestreamorthesource’?ComparingGregorianandOldRomanGreatResponsories RecountingthetransmissionofRomanchantnorthoftheAlpsintheearlyninth century,JohntheDeacondescribes’sdissatisfactionatthediscrepancieshe perceivesbetweenRomanandGallicanchant.Inaquotationnowfamous,Charlemagne askswhetherthe‘streamorthesource’isliabletoprovidethepurestwater,advisingthe GaulstoreturntotheRoman‘source’.Recentscholarshiphasshownthatpurityisan extravagantclaimforeithertradition;linksbetweentheGregorianandtheOldRoman repertorieshavebeenidentifiedandexamined,however.Thispapercomparesthe GregoriancorpusofGreatResponsorieswiththeOldRomancorpus.Inthepast,this kindofcomparisonwasundertakenusingtherepertoriesofgraduals(byNancyvan Deusen),tracts(byEmmaHornby),and(byRebeccaMaloy).PaulCutter initiatedthecomparisonofresponsories,limitinghisworktothoseinmode2.Extending thecomparisontoothermodes,IcompareinformationinmydatabaseofGregorian responsories(asfoundinnineearlyantiphonersacrossEurope)totheOldRoman responsoryrepertoryanddiscusswhycertainmelodicdifferencesbetweenthemmight occur. 11:25LászlóDobszay CommentsonAlbi44 Albi44isaveryarchaicsourcewithregardtobothitsorganizationandits repertory.Acomparisonwiththe CAO andwithOldRomansourcesleadstoconclusions abouttheearlieststagesoftheRomanOfficeChant. 11:50JeremyLlewellyn Amodernioribusvocanturcaudae :JacobusLeodiensisandtextlessnessinmedievalchant Writingatthebeginningofthefourteenthcentury,IacobusLeodiensis’spolemics againsttheModernsarewelldocumentedandwellknown.Ofinterest,however,isa statementfromthesixthbookofhis Speculummusicae ,inwhichhedescribesthe differentiae ofOfficeantiphons,whichwereincertainlocalitiesperformedwithtextless melodicextensions:whereasthese,accordingtoIacobus,arecalled aptitudines , formulae , neumae , odae or iubili bysome,theyaretermed caudae bymoremodern authors.Thisrollcalloftextlessformsinmedievalchantprovidesthemainmaterialfor thepaper.Thehistoricalusageandcontextofeachtermwillbeexamined—alsowith referencetonotatedmelodies—andthecrucial,ifuntilnowrarelyaskedquestion concerningpossiblecontinuitiesintheaestheticennobling,theologicaljustificationand pedagogicalutilityoftextlessnesswillbeaddressed,continuitiesthatwouldlink,for example,aninthcenturyNotkertoatwelfthcenturyLeoninus. 12:15Discussion 12:30Lunch;MeetingofEditorialBoard,'Historiae'

Early methods of singing Chair:JosephDyer 2:30EmmaHornby withRebeccaMaloy AnalysisofOldHispanicchant:problemsandproposals Inthispaper,wepresentthepreliminaryfindingsofapilotprojectonOld Hispanicchant,whichconcentratesonthe in directum LentenMasschants(the threni , someLenten laudes ,andtheVigil).Wediscussourmethodologyand findingsinrelationtothe threni ,whichreplacesthe psalmi (theOldHispanicequivalent ofthegradual)oncertainLentenfeasts.Theuseineachchantofasingleformulaic melodymeansthatitistheidealgenrewithwhichtodevelopamethodologyfor establishingitsmelodicprincipleswithouttheassistanceofpitchednotation.This providesthestartingpointforcomparisonoftheOldHispanicchanttootherchant traditions.Wealsoinvestigatetherelationshipbetweentextandmusic,thetextual traditionsofthechants,andtheroleofbiblicalexegesisinthechoiceandtreatmentof liturgicaltextsinOldHispanicchant.Sinceallofthe threni textsarederivedfromJob, JeremiahandtheLamentationsofJeremiah,thetheologicalresonancesofthesechants arelimitedinscale. PreviousscholarshipontheOldHispanicritehasoftenconcentratedonthe (probablyinsuperable)challengeofmakingtranscriptionsofthenonpitchednotations. Ourintentionistounderstandsomethingofthemusicalgrammarandtransmission historyofthetradition,whilesidesteppingthequestionofprecisetranscriptionentirely. Wewillbeanalysingthechantsthroughtheirshapes,andconsideringthe relationshipbetweentextandmusicandtherolewhichtheologicalthemesplayinthe liturgicalplanningandmusicalshapeoftheOldHispanicrite. 2:55DiogoAltedaVeiga :VeniteadLusitaniam :Comparativestudiesofmonophonicalleluiae inpre1600 Portuguesesources Theresearchproject‘ADigitalSurveyofPre1600MusicalSources’,inprogress atCESEM(theResearchCentreforMusicalSociologyandAesthetics,Universidade NovadeLisboa),isprovidingawiderknowledgeofpre1600musicmanuscriptskeptin severalPortuguesearchives.Alargenumberofthesesources,almostallofthem liturgicalmanuscripts,whetherfragmentsorfullcodices,untilnowremainedunidentified andlackingmusicologicalstudy. Thepresentpaperisbasedontheauthor’smaster’sthesis,Themonophonic alleluia inPortugalpriorto1600:acomparativestudy .Itsprincipalpointsofdeparture areseveralofManuelPedroFerreira’sstudiesofPortuguesesourcesandhissuggestions forfurtherresearch,togetherwithKarlheinzSchlager’scatalogueandmonumental editionofalleluiamelodies,whichprovidesalargerEuropeanframeworkforthepresent comparativestudy. Theparticularchoiceof alleluiae liesinthefactthatthegenre,asiswellknown, includesabodyofearlymelodies,aswellasalargerepertorythatincreasedwith additionsthatweremadetoitduringthecourseoftheMiddleAges.Differentlevelsof conformityordivergencecanthereforebedetectedinthewrittentransmission,including local,regionalandtransregionalvariantsandmelodies. ThispaperwillpresentanoverviewofthePortuguesesourcescontaining uptoc.1600andofthosealleluiasselectedforcomparativeanalysis.Severalexamples discussedhereillustrateavaried,sometimescomplexpanoramaofliturgicalchoicesand melodicrelationships.Finally,someconclusionswillbedrawnconcerningthemelodic affiliationandoriginsofthetraditionsencounteredinthesouthernAtlanticcoastof Europe. 3:20BalázsDéri TheCoptic Psalmos .TextandArchitext,or,betweencomposingandorality ThetheologicalspiritualimportanceoftheCopticHolyWeekasthecentreofthe liturgicalyearisemphasizedbyitsveryspecialliturgicalcharacter.Themostremarkable featureofthePaschaistheuncommonstructure,thecontentandthe“performance”of theCanonicalHours.Thesolotuttichantingofthepsalmversicle( Psalmos )beforethe GospelreadingisthemostimpressivepointoftheHours,commonbothintheHoly Liturgy(itcanbecomparedtotheLatin Graduale )andintheCanonicalHoursofHoly Week.Mostofthe Psalmo s(atleasttenperday)arechantedusingaspecialtunefor HolyWeek.Themembersofamonasticcommunityorthepriestsanddeaconsofa cathedraloraparishchurch(allofthemofdifferentgiftsandaptitudes)mustbeableto applythetunetotextsofdifferentlengthandcontent,andperformthelengthy Psalmos (of510minutes)inaverymelismaticmanner.Basedonfieldworkintwo ofWadianNatruninEgypt,Ianalyzetheunchangingmusicalstructuresofthe Psalmos andthechangingelementsofitsperformance. 3:45Discussion 4:00CoffeeBreak Manuscripts Chair:BarbaraHagghHuglo 4:30ManuelPedroFerreira Congregatisuntinimicinostri :Asurvey,acodexandtheHolyWar Inthisbriefillustratedoverviewofaresearchprojectdevelopedintheperiod 20052008,‘ADigitalSurveyofPre1600MusicalSourcesinPortugueseArchives’,one ofthemanuscriptssurveyed,PCugMM45,ofunknownprovenance,willbeanalysed,its originestablishedanditscontentsinterpreted.Twomainfeatureswillbeconsidered:its collectionoftwentyinvitatorytonesanditsconnectionwiththeHolyWar,includingthe ChristianconquestofJerusalemandtheroleofmilitaryordersintheIberianPeninsula. 4:55MaraFortu MedievalCistercianchantmanuscriptsinPortugalandGalicia UnlikesomeotherreligiousOrders,thehaveleftbehinda considerablenumberofmanuscriptsspreadacrossEurope,whichhaveconstitutedthe subjectofmanymusicologicalstudies.Onlyafewofthesestudieshavementionedthe CistercianchantmanuscriptsoftheWesternIberianPeninsula(PortugalandGalicia), however,althoughitisknownthatthisareaholdsoneofthegreatestandrichest collectionsofmusicalliturgicalmanuscriptsinEurope,ofwhichnothoroughinventory hasyetbeencompleted. Duringmydoctoralresearch,whilesystematicallystudyingoriginalsourcesin SpanishandPortugueselibrariesandmuseums,Ihavediscoveredandidentifiedan astoundingrangeofeleventhtofourteenthcenturyCistercianmanuscripts,manyof whichoriginatedinthescriptoriumofAlcobaça;sofar,theyhavenotbeenstudiedor evenknowntoexistatall.Thesemanuscriptsrepresentauthenticwitnessestothe uniquenessandoriginalityofthemonasticscriptoriumofAlcobaça(adaughterhouseof Clairvaux),withinthebroaderinternationalcontext. Startingfromthedescriptionandpalaeographicalstudyofnotationalpeculiarities ofthesemanuscripts,aswellastheircomparisontootherCistercianmanuscriptsofthe Clairvauxbranch,thispresentationwilldemonstratetheimportanceandtheparticular featuresandroleplayedbytheAlcobaçainthehistoryofchant,especiallythatofthe IberianPeninsula. 5:20RobertKlugseder MedievalmusicalsourcesintheAustrianNationalLibrary,Vienna Themainaimofthiscataloguingprojectisthecompilationandevaluationofall sourceswithmusicalnotationheldintheDepartmentofManuscriptsandtheDepartment ofMusicoftheAustrianNationalLibrary.ThemajorityconsistsofLatincodices,but GermanandCzechtextsarealsoinvolved.TheprojectissupportedbytheAustrian ScienceFund(FWF)andwillrunfrom2008to2011.Withintheframeworkofthe project,weintendtocompilenotamereinventory,butratheradescriptivecatalogue, withroomforsummarycasestudies,placingtheindividualsourcesintheirrespective contextsandjudgingtheirrelevancewithregardtomusichistory.Wechosethegenerally acceptedhistoricalcaesuraofaround1500asatimelimit,whichinsomecases(e.g. antiphoners)willbeextendedintotheearlysixteenthcentury.Usersoftheonline catalogueshouldbeabletoobtainafairlyclearandcompletenotionofthetypeand contentoftherespectivesources;digitalimagesarealsoincludedinthedescriptions. Analmostunknowninventorycompiledin1928bythemusichistorianand librarian,ConstantinSchneider,hasbeenscannedandcanbeconsultedattheprojectsite. Asafirstsourceofinformation,Schneider’sannotationsareperhapsoflimited usefulnessforthemodernscholar,butnowhereelsecanonefindageneraloverviewof themusicalcodicespreservedintheÖNB.Schneider’ssystemofclassificationis explainedonthehomepage. AnotherlinkleadstothewellknowngeneralcatalogueofViennesemanuscripts preparedinthenineteenthcentury,the Tabulaecodicummanuscriptorum…in BibliothecaPalatinaVindobonensiasservatorum .Informationonparticularsourcescan beobtainedbysearchingthedatabaseofcodiceswithmusicalnotation(over600entries) or,forcomparisonandregionalstudies,thedatabaseofliturgicalmanuscriptswithout notation(approximately1100).Searchoptionsaretheshelfmark,contents,thedateor centuryandtheprovenance;combinedqueriesarealsopossible. Aspecialneumetabledisplaysthebasicnotationalformsofallnotated manuscriptsdescribedsofar.Thisoverview,togetherwithwholepagephotos,solvesthe problemofdescribingnotationsystemsaccuratelyinthelimitedformatofacatalogue. 5:45HannaZühlke AcloserlookatCod.14208fromtheAustrianNationalLibrary,Vienna ThegradualsacramentaryAWn14208,writtenaround1300,isamongthose codicesoftheAustrianNationalLibrarythathavenotbeenexaminedverycloselyin musicologicalliteratureuptonow.Apartfromitsroughlocalizationintheareaofthe SalzburgdioceseanditscleardeviationfromtheliturgyoftheSalzburgcathedral, precisestatementsabouttheprovenanceofthemanuscriptarestillmissing. Thistalkaimstodefinetheplaceoforiginanddestinationofthesourcemore precisely.ItscalendarreferstonumeroussaintsoftheOrdoTheutonicorum(OT),aside fromthetypicalsouthernGermanandSalzburgiansaints’days.Giventhisbackground, inasecondstage,thespecificrepertorytransmittedbyCod.14208willbeevaluatedwith regardtothemusicalandliturgicaltraditionoftheTeutonicOrder. Dasum1300geschriebeneGradualeSakramentarAWn14208zähltzudenin dermusikwissenschaftlichenLiteraturbislangnuramRandebeleuchtetenCodicesder ÖsterreichischenNationalbibliothek.ÜberdiegrobeLokalisierungindenRaumder SalzburgerDiözeseunddasdeutlicheAbweichenvonderLiturgiedesDomstifteshinaus wurdennochkeinenäherenAngabenzurProvenienzderHandschriftgemacht. ImVortragsollnunversuchtwerdenEntstehungsbzw.Bestimmungsortdieser Quelleweitereinzugrenzen.HinweisehierfürbietetinsbesonderedasKalendarium, welchesnebendentypischsüddeutschsalzburgischenHeiligenfestensowohlim GrundbestandalsauchimBereichderNachträgeeineVielzahlanHeiligenausdem FestkalenderdesDeutschenOrdens(OT)zitiert.VordiesemHintergrundgiltesineinem zweitenSchritt,denspezifischenÜberlieferungsbefunddesCod.14208mitBlickaufdie musikalischliturgischeTraditiondesOTzubewerten. 6:10Discussion 7Dinner;Meetingofthe'CantusPlanus'AdvisoryBoard TUESDAYAugust25 Philology and Music Chair:NicolasBell 9InvitedLecturer3:GunillaIversen Pronouncingtheineffable:ideasandstrategiesinmedievalliturgicalpoetry Whenstudyinghowthepoeticexperiencehasbeenexplainedandtreatedin Westernculture,itsoonbecomesevidentthatpoetryhasnotalwaysbeenperceivedas onegenreamongmany,butasabasicexpressionofanexperienceofthehuman condition.Thisexperienceisthehumandiscoveryofitselfinthepresenceofthe ineffable,inthepresenceoftheinvisible.Poetryandindividualreligiousexperiences, poetryandthedivine,poetryandsilence,poetryandtranscendence,consequently constituteimportantconceptualfieldsinthiskindofresearch.Inthepresenceofthe ineffable,itispossibletopronouncewordswhichinthemselvespreservetheineffable,or totranscendthemtoexplanatorywords.ThistensionformsacentralpartoftheChristian traditionandreceiveditsfundamentalexpressionintheformofliturgicalpoetry:innew creationssuchas,sequencesandtropes,processionalantiphons,newresponsories, andverses,allsungwithintheframeofthecentralandfundamentalculturalsceneofthe Christianculture,thatis,thesolemncelebrationoftheliturgyofthemassandthedaily office. Textualinterpretationintheformoftropescommentingonthebiblicalwordsof thechantscanbeseenasakindofsungglosswithintheliturgicalcelebration.Early sequencesoftenseemtofunctionasameansoftransformingintoacorporealvocal expressionthemeaningoftheoriginallyHebrewword‘Alleluia’.Toaffectthemind,the wordshavetobesung.Inviewofthegreatimportanceoftheperformanceofliturgical poetry,itisnotsurprisingthatcertainauthors,suchasReginoofPrüminthelateninth century,hadlocatedPoetriaunderMusicratherthanGrammarorRhetoric.InthispaperI willpresentsomegeneralreflectionsonthisfieldofresearchandexaminespecific examplestakenfrommanuscriptsdatingfromtheninthtothetwelfthcenturies. 9:30AnnMarieNilsson Chantswithdifferenttextmetresadaptedtothesamemelody:therelationshipbetween textsandmelodyintheofficesforSts.AnneandAnsgar ThebishopofLinköping,NicolausHermanni(NilsHermansson),hasbeen celebratedastheauthorofthreesaints’offices:Rosaroransbonitatem (AH25:57)forSt. BirgittaofSweden, Felixorbis,felixhora (AH25:21)forSt.Anne,motheroftheVirgin Mary,and Ludovicusimperator (AH25:31,itsmusicpreservedinfragments),the SwedishofficeforSt.Ansgar[ius](the‘ApostleoftheNorth’).Inmypaper,Iwill discussthestrategiesofadaptationinselectedresponsoriesfromtheofficesforAnneand Ansgar. Althoughmostofthepoetictextsintheseofficesdifferastometricalstructure, andsomeoftheresponsoriesforAnsgarhaveprosetexts,theyareadaptedtothesame melodies,mostofwhicharederivedfromtheofficeofSt.Dominic,Gaudefelixparens Hispania (AH25:85).SomemodelsarefromtheNordicSaturdayofficefortheVirgin, StellaMariamarisparisexpers ,andoneistakenfromtheofficeforSt.PetertheMartyr (OP). TheNordicofficeforAnne'shusband, Josephexortusregia (preservedin fragmentsandincompletely),alsocontainsmelodiessimilartothoseof StellaMaria .In somecases,thetextmeter,inothers,thesyntaxofthetext,seemtohavebeendecisive whenthechanttextswereadjustedtogivenmelodicphrases.Analysesshowthatmelodic cadencesandphrasesofthedifferenttextstendtocoincidewiththeeffectofanoverall bipartitestructure.Thepsalmodicstructureofbiblicalprosetextsmightbesupposedto havehadanimpactontheprocessofadaptation. Sincetextmelodyrelationshipsandmelodicvariantshavebeenofincreasing interestandcentraltoourstudygroup(seearticlese.g.byHaug&Björkvall1999,2000, Dobszay2008),IhavepreparedcomparativetablesoftheofficemelodiesforAnneand Ansgarandtheirmodelsforaforthcomingedition,probablyontheinternet. 9:55CharlesE.Brewer TwofragmentaryLatinsongcollectionsfromthirteenthcenturyNormandy StudiesofmedievalLatinsonghaveoftenconcentratedonthewellpreservedand widelydisseminatedsourcesassociatedwithNotreDame,whilemanyuniqueand interestingrepertoriesarepreservedinlesserknownandfragmentarymanuscripts.This studyisfocusedontwosmallfragmentarycollectionsofthirteenthcenturyLatinsong fromtheBenedictineAbbeyofinNormandy.Whiletheircontentshavebeenused brieflyinearlierstudies(forexample,byLipphardtandStevens),theyhaveneverbeen examinedasuniquemusicalandculturaldocuments. Thecontentsofthesecollections(Évreux,Bibliothèquemunicipale,MSSL2and L39),nowreboundinothermanuscripts,includeanumberofwellknown compositions:twobyPhiliptheChancellor, AvegloriosaVirginumregina and Cumsit omniscarofenum ,GalterusofChâtillon’s Licetegercumegrotis ,andtwosimilar versionsofthefamousMarianlament, Planctusantenescia .Theyalsoincludesome anonymoussongsthatappeartobelocalcompositions,suchas Dicquigaudesprosperis , foundonlyinthesetwosources.Eachmanuscriptalsocontainsuniquesongs:L39 includes Investiganssemitas ,andL2includes AveVirgoMaria and Egomunditimens naufragium .Thislastsongissignificant,inthatitportraystheuncertaintiesoflife,both throughapessimistictextandaclearlynotatedmodalshiftatitsconclusion. Themixtureofuniquesongs,possiblycomposedattheAbbey,and internationallywellknowncompositionsfollowsthepatternfoundinthecontentsof otherbetterknowncollections,suchasthe Carminaburana .Theuniqueaspectsofthese twocollections,however,alsoprovidefirmevidenceofthecreativeliteraryandmusical culturewithinthetraditionsofthisNorman. 10:20ErikaKihlman Medievalsequencecommentaries:traditionsandtechniques Foralongtime,medievalcommentariesonsequenceshavebeenapractically unknowngenre.Beforethepublicationofmythesisin2006,onlyafewexamplesofsuch textshadbeenedited:AlanofLille’s Expositioprosaedeangelis onthesequence Ad celebresrex ,ed.byM.T.d’Alverny(1965),andthreecommentarieson Avepraeclara marisstella (onebyCaesariusofHeisterbachandtwoanonymous),ed.byR.B.C. Huygens(1969,2000).Thepaucityofcriticaleditionsdoesnotreflectthelargenumber oflatemedievalmanuscriptscontainingsequencecommentaries,however.Asmy inventoryofoverahundredmanuscriptsattests,themanuscriptsrangefromEnglandin thewesttotheCzechRepublicintheeast. Inthispaper,Imakeageneralpresentationofthegenreofthesequence commentary,aswellasofseparatecommentarytraditionsthatcanbeidentifiedinthe material.Variationsincommentarytechniques,emphasisandspecificpointsofinterest inthetextswillbedescribedanddiscussedinrelationtotheirsignificancefordifferent pedagogicalintentions.Thephysicalaspectsofthemanuscriptswillalsobetakeninto account,suchasthelayoutofthetextlayersinvolvedinthecommentary.Examplesof theseaspectsarefoundincommentariestakenfromseparatetraditionsthatrepresent differenttimesofcomposition,aswellasdifferentpedagogicalmilieuxandlevelsof instruction. 10:45Discussion 11CoffeeBreak Resources for Research Chair:TerenceBailey 11:30DebraLacosteandGerardStafleu Anewonlineresourceforcomparisonsofchantsinseries [Thisresearch,thoughrelatedtotheCANTUSdatabaseinitsrelianceonthedatacontainedtherein,has beenundertakenindependentlywithseparatefundingsourcesandindividualinitiative.] Expandingonthewebbasedresearchtool,'ResponsorySeries:Adventand', introducedbrieflyduringtheCANTUSreportatthemeetingoftheIMSStudyGroup ‘CantusPlanus’inZürich(July2007),Iwilldemonstrateanew,interactiveprogramme whichextractsandcompareschantseriesfromtheCANTUSdatabaseandsubsequently representstherelationshipsbetweenthoseseriesinavisualformat.Earlierresearch, primarilytheunpublishedworkofGabrielBeyssacandthatpresentedin CAO byRené JeanHesbert,hassuccessfullyshownthatasimilarityintheusageandorderingof particularitemsoftheliturgycanbeinterpretedasanindicationofaffinityamong manuscriptsources.The'CantusSeries'extractionprogramme,linkedthroughthe websiteoftheCANTUSdatabase(http://publish.uwo.ca/~cantus/),allowsuserstoselect anyseriesofchantsforanyliturgicaloccasionforcomparison.Whetherviewedasstrings ofchantIDnumbersorinthegraphicalrepresentationofthe'dendrogram',amodel adoptedfromclusteranalysistechniquesusedinthebiologicalsciences,theresultsof chantseriescomparisonscandemonstratemanuscriptaffinities,andcanalsoleadtonew hypothesesaboutmanyaspectsofchant,chanttransmission,hagiography,localcustoms, andcountlessotheraspectsofmedievalliturgyandliturgicalcentres.Onemightpropose thattheidealaudienceforthisnew,userdirectedwebsiteisthemembershipoftheIMS StudyGroup'CantusPlanus',agroupwhichthroughitsmandatefostersthefree exchangeofdatainelectronicform. 11:55GáborKiss Gradualia Anewprojectforcomparativeresearchintotherepertoryofthemass Thecomparativeresearchofmedievalmassrepertorieslagsbehindthatofthe officetraditions.Thismaybetheconsequenceofthegeneralimpressionthatmass repertoriesaremoreuniformand,consequently,offerlessempiricalobservationsfora studydirectedtowardstheregionalorlocaldifferenceswithintheuniversalchant tradition.Themassrepertoryalsohasseveralbranches,however,andtheindividual diocesesandecclesiasticalcentersdevelopeddifferentrepertorieswithadifferent physiognomy,which,apartfromthestableelements,containnumerousvariablepointsas well.Thestudyoftherepertoryfromthispointofview,amappingofthedifferentuses andtheirinterrelationships,requiresthecomparisonofmanysources.Whilethestudyof theofficesissupportedbyadvancedprojectsandonlinedatabases,suchastheCANTUS Indexand CAOECE ,scholarsofthemassrepertorymustbesatisfiedwithindividual studies,sourceeditionsandpersonalresearchinthelibraries. Forthisveryreason,Ihavebeguntomakeelectronicinventoriesofdifferentmass sources,concentratingfirstonindexingthemostimportantHungarianmanuscriptsand thenextendingtheworktoawidercircleof–mainlyCentralEuropean–sources. Besidesprovidinganalyticaldescriptionsoftherepertories,wehavebeguntodevelopa stereotypedliturgicaltemplate,which,bythe(numerical)fixationoftheliturgical functionsandtheorderoffeastsmakesthecomparisonofsourcesortraditionspossible. Inthisrespect, CAOECE servedasamodel.Oneofmyfurtheraimsistomakethe sourceindicesavailableonlineforinternationalresearchasacounterparttotheCANTUS project.Theinventoriesaredetailedenoughtoserveasabasisforpublishingeither individualsourcesorsourcefamilies.Thepresentpaperintroducesthemethodsand meansusedfortheprojectandsummarizesthefirstexperiencesofthetargeted comparativeresearch 12:20Discussion 12:30Lunch;MeetingofCANTUSCataloguersorInterestedCataloguers Transmission: departures and arrivals Chair:BarbaraHagghHuglo 2:30MatthewWard TrinityCollege,Cambridge,MSfragment2:evidenceforthemutablenotationand transmissionofchantinthelaterMiddleAges. Thispaperproposestoextendunderstandingofthetransmissionofchantinthe laterMiddleAgesthroughaclosereadingofanuncataloguednotedmissalbifoliumfrom England,discoveredbytheauthorin2006.Thisbifolium–fromaSarumbookofthe earlyfifteenthcentury–presentstheproperchantfortwomassesinLentwithmany strikingexamplesofvariancefromallcontemporarytraditionstowhichithasbeen compared,alliedwithnotationalquirks,inkeddrolleriesanddecoratednotes.Close analysisofthesephenomenasuggestsamanneroftransmissionnearertothatwidely acceptedfortheperiodofearlynotation,ratherthanamuteexemplartocopymodelof writtentransmission,asonemightassumeforsuchalatedate,thevariantsarenoterrors inacopyingprocess,norevidenceforignoranceorthedecadenceoftradition,butinstead theygivewitnesstoascribecloselyinvolvedinthe‘reconstruction’ofthechantheis writing,inamannerreminiscentofthemodelof‘inscribedimprovisation’describedby HuckeandelaboratedbyTreitlerfortheearliestperiodsofchantwriting(seeHucke 1980andTreitler2003).Theauthorproposesthisfragmentasanexampleofthe continuedinteractionoforalandwrittenpracticeinthelaterMiddleAges,attemptingto demonstratethecontinuedpresenceoflocal(orevenpersonal)interventioninthepassing onofchanttraditions.Inthisway,thepaperisnotonlyanextensionoftheworkof Treitler,butcomplementssuchisolatedstudiesasHuglo’sexaminationof‘notated performancepractices’inthirteenthcenturyParis(1992)andSisterThomasMore’s(Dr. MaryBerry’s)neglected1970doctoraldissertationontheperformanceofchantinthe laterMiddleAgesandsixteenthcentury.Itisapapermostdefinitely‘InPraiseofthe Variant’(Cerquiglini,1999). 2:55OrsolyaCsomóHorváthné Theliturgicalplacementsofthreeprocessionalantiphons When150processionalsourceswereconsidered,averyinterestingfactappeared: someprocessionalantiphonswereplaced Bduetotheeschatologicalmeaningoftheir texts Bindifferentliturgicallocationsindifferentsources.Theseplacementscanbe typicalforthetraditiontowhichthemanuscriptbelongs.Threeprocessionalantiphons arecentraltothisstudy: OmnipotensDeus supplices, Cumvenerimusanteconspectum, Oremusdilectissiminobis. Isearchforanswerstothefollowingquestions:Which liturgicalplacementsarethemostfrequent?Whichotherantiphonsappearwiththe examinedones?Whataretheresultsofthegeographicalandhistoricalinvestigations? Couldtheliturgicalplacementbetypicalofagiven(secularormonastic)tradition? 3:20JamesBorders ThetransmissionofnonCAO antiphonsinlatermedievalpontificals Aforthcomingsynopticeditionofchantsintwelfthtofifteenthcentury pontificals—liturgicalbookswithrubrics,prayersandchantsforservicesoverwhich onlyabishopcouldpreside—willincludesome140antiphons,byfarthelargestgroup. Oftheseantiphons,about60%havedirecttextandmusicconcordancesintheoffice.The remaining40%aresplitbetweenthoseantiphonswithtextsthatdepartsignificantlyfrom relatedofficechants(28)andthosewithnoplaceintheofficewhatsoever(31).This paperwillexamineantiphonsinthelattertwocategorieswiththeintentionofshedding lightonchanttransmissionintheHighMiddleAges.(Asregardsresponsories,thesame pontificalscontainlessthanforty,nearlyallwithconcordancesinofficebooks.) Concerningthe‘variant’antiphontexts,thelion’sshareofemendationswereevidently designedtosuittheritualparticularsofsuchpontificalservicesasthededicationofa church,theconsecrationofanaltarandtheveilingofnuns.Theneedforuniquetextsfor uniqueceremonialsalsoexplainstheintroductionofthe‘new’antiphonstexts.Thatthe textsofthe‘variant’and‘new’antiphonschangedratherlittleinlatertransmission furthersuggeststheregulationofofficialliturgy,aswellasthefactthatnearlyallthe antiphontexts,includingthe‘standard’ones,camefromtheBible. Themelodiesareadifferentmatter.Comparisonofmusicalexampleswillshow thatthemelodictransmissionofantiphonswithoutofficeconcordances(i.e.nonCAO antiphons)wasconsiderablylessstablethanthatofthefirstcategory( CAO antiphons). Thispresentationwilltrackandseektoaccountforthemostsignificantchanges. Althoughvicissitudesoforality,theintrusionoflocaltraditions,andscribalcarelessness allplayedrolesinthistransmission,suchconsiderationscannotadequatelyexplainallthe evidence.Thispaperwillthusentertainthepossibilitythatsomemelodicchangeswere productsofeditorialinterventionscoincidingwiththerecensionsofthe(socalled) PontificaloftheRomanCuriaandthePontificalofWilliamDurandusinthethirteenth century.ThatsuchaninterventionoccurredinRomeduringthepreparationofthe editio princeps ofthe PontificaleRomanum (1485)strengthensthishypothesis. 3:45Discussion 4:00CoffeeBreak Ordinals and order Chair:RomanHankeln 4:30MiklósIstvánFöldváry ArecentsurveyofCatalonianandMallorcanordinalsanditscontributiontotheeditorial approachtonormativeliturgicaltexts AlthoughtheliturgicallifeoftheIberianPeninsulaisrecordedbyplentyof manuscripts,onlyafewofthesecanbestudiedinmodernscholarlyeditions.Thisis certainlythecasewithordinalsthatareusuallycalled'consuetas'inthelocaldialects, bothLatinandvernacular.Inordertosupplementthislackofinformation,asystematic surveywasinitiatedinseveralCatalonianandMallorcanarchivesintheFallof2007, regardingespeciallythetextualrelationship,structureandterminologyofmedievaland earlymodern consuetas .Thesamplethusanalysedwasanimportantcontributiontothe typologyandhistoryofmedievalnormativeliturgicaltexts,andithelpedtoreconstruct withgreateraccuracytheoriginalcontextoffragmentarilydocumentedtraditions. 4:55FranzKarlPraßl Einige libriordinarii imUmfeldderAugustinerChorherren Mehrere libriordinarii inösterreichischenBibliotheken(Wien,Admont, St.Florian)sinddemUmfelddesSalzburgerLiberOrdinariuszuzurechnen,dasiealle zusammenmitdemEinleitungskommentar‘Secundumsexaetatesbeginnen’.DieBücher enthaltenbishernichteindeutigidentifizierteliturgischeOrdnungen,welcheingrößerer odergeringererNähezurSalzburgerDomTradition(seit1198)stehen.Diegenannten Quellensindkaumstudiert.IndiesemBeitragwirdversucht,dasBeziehungsgeflecht dieser libriordinarii zuentwirrenundeineProvenienzhinsichtlichderLiturgiezu benennen.EsgehtauchumdieFragenachdemgutfunktionierendenNetzwerkder Chorherrenbewegungim12.Jahrhundert,dasauchliturgischmusikalischeKomponenten umfaßt. 5:20IngaBehrendt AGu756:DerSeckauer Liberordinarius alsmusikalischeQuelle DieVorstellungdesrekonstruiertenKyrialeinderHandschriftAGu756,einem Liberordinarius desAugustinerChorherrenstiftesSeckauausdemJahr1345,ist GegenstanddiesesVortrags.AnhandderadiastematischeNeumenkonntendieGesänge desOrdinariumsinihremliturgischenKontextidentifiziertwerden.Dabeizeigtsich,daß nichtnurdieGestalteinzelnerGesänge,sondernauchihrePositionierungimKirchenjahr einebestimmteWirkungsintentioninderLiturgiehabenkann.DieZuordnungvonKyrie undFestgruppewirdweiterhinnichtnurfürden Liberordinarius vonSeckauvorgestellt, sondernauchmitderjenigenimSalzburger Liberordinarius ASuMII6verglichenund damitineinengrößerenKontextgestellt.Gesängehabenselbstbereitsdurchihre PositionierunginderLiturgieliturgieordnendeFunktionindermittelalterlichenLiturgie. AGu756:TheLiberordinarius fromSeckauasamusicalsource ThepresentationofthereconstructedKyrialeinthemanuscriptAGu756,a Liber ordinariusofthemonasteryoftheAugustiniancanonsofSeckaufrom1345,isthetopic ofthispaper.Withthehelpoftheadiastematic,thechantsofthisordinalintheir liturgicalcontextcouldbeidentified.Therebyitisshownthatnotonlytheshapeof individualchants,butalsotheirplacementintheChurchyearcanhaveaparticular intendedeffectintheliturgy.Furthermore,theassignmentofKyriestogroupsoffeasts willbepresentedforthe LiberordinariusofSeckauandcomparedwiththatinthe Salzburg LiberordinariusASuMII16,therebyplacingtheformerinabroadercontext chantsalreadyhaveanorganizingfunctioninthemedievalliturgybymeansoftheir positionintheliturgy. 5:45Discussion 66:45IMSStudyGroup'CantusPlanus'BusinessMeeting 7Dinner WEDNESDAYAugust26 Eastern topics Chair:ChristianTroelsgård 9:00InvitedLecturer4:EustathiosMakris EustathiosMakris studiedmusicattheNationalConservatoryinAthens,musicologyattheUniversityof andcontinuedhisstudiesattheUniversityofVienna,wherehespecializedinByzantine music,obtainingthePhDin1996(supervisor:Prof.ChristianHannick,subjectofthedissertation:“The MusicalTraditionoftheAnastasimatarioninthe16th and17 th centuries”).HehasservedasMusicLibrarian attheMusicLibraryof“LilianVoudouri”(19971999),taughtthehistoryandtheoryofByzantine musicattheUniversityofThessaloniki,DepartmentofMusicStudies(19992001),servedasMusic ResearcherattheHellenicFolkloreResearchCentreoftheAthensAcademy(20002006)andiscurrently AssociateProfessorofGreektraditionalmusic(liturgicalandsecular)attheIonianUniversity,Department ofMusicStudies(2006).In2006,hefoundedthevocalensemble“CorfuCantors”,whosemainpurposeis thecultivationanddisseminationofthelocalchantrepertoriesoftheIonianIslands,focusingespeciallyon theCorfiottradition. ChanttraditionsoftheIonianIslands ThesurvivalandfurtherdevelopmentofByzantinechantinPostbyzantinetimes ismostlyseeninconnectionwiththeOttomanEmpireanditsmusicalenvironment.The continuationofthetraditionalsoinVenetianruledterritorieswithGreekpopulationafter thefallofisaparallelreality,whichremainswidelyignoredasbeing irrelevanttothe“mainstream”traditionofthelastcenturies.Themusicalresonanceof thishistoricalrealitycanbestudiedonlyinthelocalchanttraditionsoftheIonian Islands,whichflourishedespeciallyfromtheendoftheseventeenthtothefirsthalfofthe twentiethcentury. 9:30OliverGerlach ReligiouschantinthelateOttomanEmpirebetweenPetrosBereketēsandHammamizade IsmâilDedeEfendi Introduction: Duringthenineteenthandtwentiethcenturiesandinrelationtothepolitical changesthatbroughttheOttomanEmpiretoitsend,religiouschantanditstransmission hadtogothroughseveralchanges,whichcausedmanybreakswithineverytraditionof religiouschant.Thehistoriographyandethnographyoftheisstillahighly ideologicalmatterandcanonlybeunderstoodinthecontextofapoliticalmovement, combininganewformofnationalidentificationofreligions,oranewformofreligious nationalism,withaWesternattitudeofenlightenment.ButinthisWesternorWest Europeanperspective,theBalkanswereoftensuspectedtobeadangerousand uncivilizedplace,wherethebordersbetweenthedifferentethnicgroupsanddifferent religiouscivilizationswerenotclear,andwhereinnocentvisitorswouldbeseducedto crimeandmurderousrebellions–fearsthatculminatedinWWIandtheensuing catastrophefortheGreekpopulationaroundSmyrna(Izmir1922),andrecently,inthe Yugoslavianwar. Atoddswiththisconceptofnationalcivilizationwastheseventeenthand eighteenthcenturycultureoftraditionalchant,whichwassubjecttothesenationaland medialtransformations,andwhichwas,inmanyrespects,their'sourceofinspiration'.It wasdeeplyrootedinthecultureandadministrationoftheOttomanEmpire,where musiciansandreligiouspeoplefromdifferenttraditionslivedclosetogetherandwere inspiredbyandlearnedfromeachother.Theseformsofcoexistenceandinfluencewill continuetobehardtounderstandforscholarsstudyingtraditionalmusic,aslongasthey insistonfollowingthestereotypesofByzantinestudiesthatarebasedonpurifyingthe 'nationalheritage'ofitsOttomanpast. Ingeneral,nationalismdevelopedtwodifferentpathsoftheemancipationprocess asaformofmodernization,beginningintheearlyeighteenthcentury.Theseexperiments developedsoslowlythattheycontinuedthroughtheentirenineteenthcentury: • asecularizedpath,whichaimedatturningareligiouscultureintoamodern secularizednation,inwhichthestatecouldreplacethereligiousauthority • areligiousone,wherethenationalculturehadtoberepresentedbyasacral religiousinstitution,likeanationalandOrthodoxChurch. Atatürk,whofoundedthenewTurkishrepublicinabout1923,wastheonlyone tofollowthefirstpath–althoughtherewereverysimilarplansforGreece.Heclosedall thecourtsofdervishbrotherhoods–mainlythoseoftheMevlevy and Bektashy orders– andforbadetheirreligiousactivities.YoungmusiciansweresenttoParisandViennato createanewacademicmusiccultureaccordingtotheWesternmodel,presentedinurban concerthallsandoperahouses.Traditionalmusicbecametheobjectofacademic ethnographicstudiesandthelivingoraltraditionofOttomanmusic,forinstancethe dancesuitescomposedforthedervishceremony (ayinierif),andevenimprovised forms,like Mevlid or Taksim ,werebannedandtranscribedintostaffnotation,whilethe leadingtraditionalmusicians,dervishesandhafiz’,likeRaufYektaBey,becameteachers inthenewlyfoundedmusicacademies,inordertotakeresponsibilityfortheacademic transformationoftheoraltradition. Thesecondwaywastakenbynations,whosenationalOrthodoxChurchhad establisheditsautonomy (autocephalia) fromtheofConstantinople (Istanbul)–byclaimingthe(usuallyusurped)righttohaveanownnationalpatriarchate orexarchate,asinGreece(1833),(1870),(1871),(1879)and Albania(1929).Theprocessofsecularizationcamelater,duringtheCommunistperiod, whenthenationalidentificationwiththechurchwasreinforcedbyseveralrepressionsof theCommunistgovernment. Incontrastwiththisnewnationalorientation,thenewbornautocephalous churchesandtheirchantrepertoirewerebasedontheoldpatriarchateinIstanbul,which, intheend,wasonlyresponsiblefortheChristianOrthodoxpopulationofTurkey.The medialtransformationwasmarkedbythereformofChrysanthosaround1814,when printedchantbooksweredistributedforthefirsttimewiththeGreektextstranslated(into churchSlavonicforSerbiaandBulgaria,andintoRomanianforRomania).Butitstarted withthe SecondMusicSchoolofthePatriarchate inthe1870s,twogenerationsearlier, whenthemelosofthedifferentchantgenreswasreformulatedinarhythmicstyleand writtendownintolateByzantineroundnotationbyPetrosPeloponnesiosandhis students.Manyteachers,likePetroshimself,hadadeepknowledgeofthe maqāmāt, composedtheirown maqām pieces,andlearnedtheclassicalArabianPersiantradition fromTurkishmasters,likeGrēgoriosPrōtopsaltēs,oneof'threegreatteachers'ofthe thirdgeneration.Prōtopsaltēstranscribedthecollectedrepertoireintomodernneume notation.HewasastudentoftheOttomancomposerIsmāilDedeEfendi,whocomposed sevendancesuitesindifferent maqâmât .Thesuitesarestilltodaypartofthetraditional repertoryofthe Mevlevy order(i.e.thewhirlingdervishesinthetraditionofthePersian mystic,JelaluddinRūmī,called“Mevlana”). TheevolutionofreligiouschantbetweenByzantine,Sephardic,Persianand Arabiansingerswasmorethan1000yearsold,whenPetrosBereketēsstartedtouse special phthorai, transitionmodelscalled 'hisar','müstear'and 'nisabur'(thenamesof Ottomanregions).AlthoughhewasbornonHalkēisland(Heybeliada)thelocationof theuniversityandofthepatriarchateabout1665,heneverheldanofficeatthe patriarchate,andherefusedthecontemporarywayof papadikan and kalophonic singing ofthetraditionalsongs(ofPanagiotēs,Valasios,andGermanos).Buthewasthefirst singerandcomposerwhosecompletedworkswerecollectedinanotatedform,which wasalsoanimportantfoundationforteachingattheschoolofPetrosPeloponnesiosanda motivationtoexploremoredeeplytherelationshipsbetweenthe maqāmāt andthe octōēchos .Thispaperwillfocusontheexperimentsinthisfield,analyzingMuslimand GreekOrthodoxchantincomparison.Itresultsfromaprojecttocoordinatecomparative studiesattheHalkiSoundCentre,whichcollaborateswithtraditionalsingersfrom TurkeyandGreece. Abstract: Traditionalmusicians,aswellasacademicscholarsstudyingOrthodoxchantin theBalkans,caneasilyforgetthattheyaresingingandstudyingarepertorythatwas createdasareformulationofthelivingtraditionofthelateeighteenthcenturyOttoman Empire,whichhadbeencharacterizedforcenturiesbycommunicationamongSephardic, ChristianandSufimusicians,wholearnedfromeachother.Theexistenceofsuch exchangesduringtheOttomanEmpireisoftenignoredintheculturalmemoryofaGreek orBulgarian,whoconsidersthistheperiodofthe'Turkokratia'or'Turkishyoke'. ThisstudyemphasizestheeighteenthcenturyschoolofPetrosPeloponnesios, whichreformulatedthetraditionalchantgenres(troparic,heirmologic,sticheraric, papadikan & kalophonic) fortheirtranscriptionintonewprintedchantbooks.These bookswouldbecomethepointofdeparturefornationalizedOrthodoxrepertoriesof chantinmanyBalkancountries.ThesingersatPetrosPeloponnesios'sschoolhadstudied thecompositionsofPetrosBereketes,whosecompleteworkswerecollectedinanotated form,usingtransitionalmodelsnamedafterseventeenthcenturyOttomanregions.The samesingersalsocomposedmaqâmâtmusicandweretaughtbyfamousTurkish composers,suchasIsmailDedeEfendi–adervish,whocomposedsevendancesuitesin different maqâmât fortheceremonyofthewhirlingdervishes,compositionsthatarestill partofthetraditionalrepertory. Recentstudies,likethoseofMarkMazower,aboutthenationalmovements breakingawayfromtheOttomanEmpire,helponetounderstandbetterthehistorical backgroundofthistransformationofchanttransmission,whichoccurredinmany countries,includingTurkey.Inthisrespect,wehaveseveralverycomplexareasofstudy foreachtradition,which,becausetheyrequireconsiderationofIslamicaswellasof Byzantinemusic,wouldbenefitfrominterdisciplinaryexchange.Thiswouldbethebest waytocontinuethestudiesofSimonKaras,whocouldunderstandthe maqâmât onlyas partoftheHellenicoktōēchos system,andIannisZannos,whofollowedinhisfootsteps, usingthemethodsofsystematicmusicology. Aspects of cantus Chair:JamesBorders 9:55CharlesM.Atkinson Frutolf(?)themagician Oneofthetheoreticalinnovationsmostcloselyassociatedwiththe Prologusin tonarium ofBernofReichenau(d.1048)isthedefinitionofthechurchmodesas concatenationsofspeciesoffourthsandfifths.Buildinguponontheearliertreatise usuallyidentifiedbyitsincipit, Primaspecies ,themostcompleteversionofthe Prologus notonlypresentsthechurchmodesasconjunctionsofspeciesoffourthsandfifths,but alsosituatestheseonthetonesystemusuallyattributedtoPseudoOdo,usingboth RomanlettersandancientGreekstringnames.Ironically,however,Bern’sowntreatment ofthetopicisratherfarfromtheversionjustdescribed.Thespeciesofdiatessaronand diapentehepresents,whicharesituatedfirmlyontheancientGreekImmutableSystem, cannotbecombinedtoformthevaryingoctavespeciesthatwouldmakeuptheeight churchmodes.Theprocessbywhichthisbecomespossibleistheworkofaninterpolator whomAlexanderRauschhasidentifiedasFrutolfofMichelsberg(d.1103). Inanactofintellectual legerdemain thatHoudinimighthaveadmired,the interpolatorredefinestheelementsofBern’streatmentthatwerefaultyinthefirstplace, ultimatelyallowingBern’sowndescriptionofthechurchmodestostandashewroteit— withthemajordifferencebeingthatitnowmakessense.Thispaperwilldescribethe natureoftheprobleminBern’sownapproachtothedefinitionofthechurchmodes,and willtracktheinterpolator’smovesashecontrivestoallowBern’stheoryofthechurch modestomakesensewithitself. 10:20Discussion 10:30CoffeeBreak Aspects of cantus (cont.) Chair:JamesBorders 11:00GabriellaGilányi LentenchantsontherisingofLazarusinearlyMediterraneanantiphoners ForFridayofthefourthweekinLent,medievalofficesourcesgenerallyassign twoantiphonstothegreatGospelCanticles–onetotheBenedictusandanotherto –whosetextsderivefromtheGospelofthedayonthestoryofLazarusof Bethany.EarlyantiphonersfromtheAquitaineandfromItalianareaspreserveda widerselectionofsuchchantsonLazarusatthesameplaceintheliturgy.Inspections have revealedthatthephenomenonwasisolated:thesesurplusantiphonsand responsoriesareunknownoutsidetheMediterraneanbasin.Severalquestionsarise: Wheredothesechantscomefrom?Whatistheconnectionbetweenthisgroupofitems andthecultandofficeofLazarusinMarseilles?WhataboutthechantsoftheLenten DominicadeLazaro inAmbrosiansources?Whatcanbeprovenbymusicalanalysis?By collectingthe‘virtual’seriesof Lazarus chantsanddescribingthemmusically,thispaper presentssomenewdataaboutearlyrepertorialconnectionsbetweenMediterraneanrites, MassandDivineOffice,TemporaleandSanctorale. 11:25CesarinoRuini NotaRomanainAemilia.DocumentaryevidenceforthediffusionofCentralItalian notationinthedioceseofReggioEmilia Forovertwentyyears,GiacomoBaroffiohasbeenproposinganewinterpretative approach,whichisreshapingourunderstandingoftheappearanceanddiffusionof musicalnotationinItaly('LegrafiemusicalineimanoscrittiliturgicidelsecoloXII nell’Italiasettentrionale.Avvioaunaricerca',in IMSStudyGroup‘CantusPlanus’: PapersReadattheFourthMeetingPécs,Hungary,38September1990 ,Budapest,1992, pp.116; BibliotecaApostolicaVaticanaArchivioS.PietroB79.Antifonariodella BasilicadiS.Pietro(Sec.XII) ,Roma,1995,2531).Inarecentarticle('NotaRomana: l’espansionedellenotazioniitalianeel’aread’influssodeiCanossa',in Matildeeiltesoro deiCanossatracastelli,monasteriecittà ,Milano,2008,pp.165175),hearguesthatthe differentwaysinwhichmanuscriptculturespreadappeartobelinkedtotheincreasing useofthesocalled'CentralItaliannotation',whichhehasrenamed'NotaRomana'. AcrucialphaseinthespreadofNotaRomanacoincidedwiththemovementfor renewaloftheChurch,whichwaspromotedbytheGregorianReformandwasreflected intheInvestitureControversy(10461123)withinapoliticalcontextinwhichthe CanossadynastyandCountessMatilda,inparticular,wereinvolvedinadramatic strugglebetweenPopeGregoryVIIandHenryIV. AthirteenthcenturyhymnalfromthecathedralinReggioEmilia,togetherwitha seriesofparchmentfragmentsrecentlyrecoveredfrombindingsinthesamearea,allow ustomakecomparisonsandestablishconnectionswithmusicalwritinginTuscany.This materialprovidesfurtherdocumentaryevidencetoconfirmthewaythenotationspread, asdescribedbyBaroffio.Infact,theconnectionshediscoveredbetweenTuscanyand Emiliaconcerntwoareassituatedatthecentreofthefeudalsystemgovernedbythe Canossafamily.Thesefragmentsofhistoricalevidence,whichareamongtheoldest musicaldocumentsoftheChurchinReggioEmilia,alsoprovidehithertounknown detailsregardinglocalliturgicalcustoms. NotaRomanainAemilia.Documentisulladiffusionedellanotazionedell’Italiacentrale nelladiocesidiReggioEmilia DaalcunidecenniGiacomoBaroffioproponenuovelineeinterpretativeeva ridisegnandolamappadellacomparsaedelladiffusionedellanotazionemusicaleinItalia (LegrafiemusicalineimanoscrittiliturgicidelsecoloXIInell’Italiasettentrionale.Avvio aunaricerca,inIMSStudyGroup‘CantusPlanus’:PapersReadattheFourthMeeting Pécs,Hungary,38Septembre1990,Budapest,1992,pp.116;BibliotecaApostolica VaticanaArchivioS.PietroB79.AntifonariodellaBasilicadiS.Pietro(Sec.XII), Roma,1995,2531).Inunrecentecontributo(NotaRomana:l’espansionedellenotazioni italianeel’aread’influssodeiCanossa,inMatildeeiltesorodeiCanossatracastelli, monasteriecittà,Milano,2008,pp.165175)hadelineatounaseriedipercorsidi trasmissionedellaculturalibraria,aiqualiappaionoconnessedirezionidiespansione dellanotazionecosiddetta‘dell’Italiacentrale’,cheegliharibattezzato“NotaRomana”. Unmomentocrucialediquestapropagazioneèconcomitanteall’affermarsidelleistanze dirinnovamentodellavitaecclesiastica,sollecitatedallaRiformagregorianaeriflesse nellalottaperleinvestiture(10461123),inuncontestopoliticochevideladinastiadei Canossae,primafratutti,lacontessaMatilde,traiprotagonistidell’epicoscontrotrail papaGregorioVIIel’imperatoreEnricoIV. UninnarioduecentescoprovenientedallacattedralediReggioEmila,cuiva connessaunaseriedipergamenerecentementerecuperatedalegatureinambitolocale, consentediinstaurareconfrontiestabilireconnessionicongrafiemusicalidiarea toscana,corredandodiunulterioresupportodocumentarioconcretoipercorsidi circolazionedelineatidaBaroffio:icollegamentiindividuatitraToscanaedEmilia interessanoinfattidueareecollocateesattamentealcentrodelsistemadeifeudi controllatidaiCanossa.Questetestimonianzeframmentari,traipiùantichidocumenti musicalidellachiesareggiana,rivelanoinoltreparticolarifinorasconosciutisugliusi liturgicilocali. 11:5512:15Discussion 12:30Lunch The twelfth century Chair:JeremyLlewellyn 2MiriamMonroeWendling PitchclarificationintwelfthcenturyBamberg ScribesworkingforBambergCathedralinthetwelfthcenturybegantochange thesouthGermanneumaticnotationtheyusedtocopyliturgicalbooksbyalteringold signsandincorporatingnewones.UnlikescribesinotherpartsofWesternEurope,these Bambergscribesheldontothepracticeofwritingneumes in campoaperto ,supportedby theirownoraltradition,longafterstaffnotationbecamestandardelsewhere.Thiswasnot forwantofcontactwithorignoranceofstaffnotations.Rather,itappearstohavebeena consciouschoicemadebythoseinvolvedintheproductionofliturgicalmanuscripts. Fivetwelfthcenturymanuscriptssomewhichrepresentcollaborativeeffortsby multiplescribes,aswellasseveralfromthethirteenthcenturydemonstratethatthe retentionofneumes in campoaperto wasnotwithoutchallengesforthecommunity: thesesourcesallcontainavarietyofsignsandmethodsdesignedtoclarifypitch,while refrainingfromusingadirectlypitchspecificnotation.Nokeyortreatisehasbeenfound tointroducetheinnovativesignstoamodern(ormedieval)reader.Thus,thisresearch usesscribebasedandcomparativepalaeographytoidentifythealterationsand‘decode’ themeaningsoftheneumes.Thispaperfocusesonpitchclarifyingprocedures,suchas thoseshowingtheplacementof fa ,ortheupperpitchoftheintervalofasemitone,within amelody. 2:25SvetlanaPoliakova Sin319andVoskr27:InnovationinRussianliturgicalpracticeattheendofthetwelfth century ThispaperconcernstwoRussianmanuscriptsfromthetwelfthcenturyinthe HistoricalMuseum,theLenten,Sinod.319,andthe, Voskr.27.ThesebookswereincludedinstudiesbysomescholarsfromRussiaandthe West.Inthiscommunication,whichistheresultofPh.D.dissertationresearch,theplace ofwritingofoneofthebooksandthedateofwritingoftheotherarecorrected. Followinganalysisofthetexts,semiologyandpalaeography,itisconcludedthatboth bookswerewrittenasanintegralpartofthesamegroup,inoneofthescriptoriaof Novgorod.ThetenSofiskyMenaia,Sinod.159168,arealsoattributedtothesameset. Regardingthetypeofliturgicalbook,Sin319,Voskr27andSofiskyMenaiarepresenta codexwhichincludesdifferentgenresofcanticles. Thesemanuscriptsarenotatedwithznamennynotation.Thisnotation,inthe Russiantradition,canbefoundmostlyincollectionsofthesamegenreSticherariaand Heirmologia.ThepresenceofthetextsofcontrafactawithznamennynotationinSin319, Voskr27andSofiskyMenaiamakesthesemultigenreliturgicalbooksunique.Theuse ofthetechniqueofcontrafactuminRussiapresentedmoredifficultiesthaninGreek speakingtraditions.Thecomplexityofthetechniquepresupposesprofessionaltraining, theacquisitionofwhichmusthavetakenaconsiderableamountoftime.Tothisonemay addthevastgeographyofRussia,whichconditionedtheappearanceofagreatvarietyof localcontrafacta.Bytheendofthetwelfthcentury,itbecamenecessarytofixandunify thetechniqueofcontrafactum.Forthispurpose,anewkindofbookwascreated,setting outthe“official”version,therebyunifyingallthecontrafacta.Thisexemplaryset consistedoftheSophiaMenaia,Sin319andVoskr27. 2:50Discussion Central European chant Chair:DavidHiley 3InvitedLecturer5:JankaSzendrei RareanduniquesequencesfromaTransylvaniansource MedgyeswasanimportantcenterforthecommunityofGermanspeakingsettlers inmedievalHungary.OneProsersurvivedfromthem,whichisaninterestingmixtureof typicalCentralEuropean,German,Hungarianandperhapslocalrepertory.Thispaper seekstoseparatetheselayersandhighlightthe unica inthehopethatcolleaguescan identifythem. 3:30JanKoláček LiturgicalandchanttransitionsinlatemedievalBohemiangraduals ResearchtoolsforstudyingchantsourcesofBohemianprovenancefromthe fifteenthandsixteenthcenturieswereintegratedintoanewdatabasethatoffersthe possibilityofsystematicalresearchontherepertoryandliturgyofBohemian manuscripts.ThatitsmelodiccodesarecompatiblewiththeVolpianofontandother electronicresources,includingthedigitized IndexofGregorianChant (Brydenand Hughes),permitsthestudyoftransitionsofplainchantinthelatemedievalBohemian sourcesthatincludearepertoryinthevernacular.Thecomparativeapproach,basedon statisticalevaluationoftextualandmelodicconcordances,helpsustofindrelationships betweenthesources.Usingthismethodinearlierresearch,Ihavefoundliturgical connectionsbetweensixteenthcenturyBohemiangradualsandLutheraninfluences,as wellasrepertorialresemblancesinmanuscriptsoriginatinginthesamescriptorium.This papersummarizesthemainliturgicaltendenciesinthelatemedievalBohemiangraduals andspecifiesanumberofnewmelodiesintheUtraquistmassliturgy.Abrief presentationoftheGlobalChantDatabaseproject(www.globalchant.org)willbe includedinthispaper. 3:55Discussion 4CoffeeBreak 4:30JurijSnoj TheFranciscansinCarniolaandtheirchant IntheinnerAustrianprovincesofCarniolaandStyria,theFranciscanshad alreadyappearedbythemidthirteenthcentury.FourFranciscansettlementscameinto beingbytheendofthethirteenthcentury,andtheyformedpartofthe'privoncia Austriae'.Duringthenexttwocenturies,thenumberoftheFranciscanmonasteries increased,andaround1500therewereabouttenFranciscansettlementsontheterritory underconsideration,themajorityofthembelongingtothebranchoftheObservants. AlthoughtherecanbenodoubtthattheFranciscansinCarniolaandStyriaperformeda chantedliturgy,thewrittendocumentationoftheirsingingappearstobejustpartly preserved(ornotyetidentified). ThereisafifteenthcenturygradualinthemonasteryofNovomesto(German: Rudolfswert),andthemonasteryofLjubljanaboastsasetofmanuscriptsdatingfromthe verybeginningofthesixteenthcentury,asthe'custodiaCarnioliae'wasestablished(in 1517).Asexpected,thesemanuscripts,writteninsquarenotation,showthe characteristicsoftheliturgyoftheRomanCuria.Yetacomparisonofthetwograduals revealsdifferences,too.Thedifferenceslienotsomuchintheliturgicalcalendarandin theorderofthechants,butalsointheirmusicalshape.Themelodicvariantstobeseenin thegradualsmakeitlikelythatthetwomanuscriptsdonotsharethesameexemplar;their studyleadstoamoregeneralconsiderationoftheaestheticaspectsofthehistoryoflate plainchant. 4:55AnaČizmić TheDubrovnikantiphoner:presentation TheDubrovnikantiphonerisafullantiphonerinfourparts,keptinthelibraryof themonasteryofFriarsMinorinDubrovnik,Croatia.Allfourmanuscriptsarewrittenon parchmentbythesamescribe.ThenotationinallfourmanuscriptsistheItaliantypeof squarenotation.Therearenodirectelementstoindicatethedateortheoriginofthe manuscript,buttheDubrovnikantiphonerwasprobablymadeinthesecondhalfofthe fifteencentury,inanItalianscriptorium.Althoughtheprovenanceofthemanuscriptis notknown,itcanbeproventhattheantiphonerwasusedinthemonasteryoftheFriars MinorinDubrovnik,sincethemanuscriptcontainstheFranciscanliturgy.Acomparison ofitscontentwithothersourcesonlyconfirmsthisthesis.Thisisnotselfevident, becausetheantiphonerincludesnofeastsofSt.Francis,St.AnthonyofPaduaorSt. Clare,whicharesaintsespeciallyveneratedbytheFranciscanOrder.Thereisno explanationwhythesefeastsaremissing.TheofficeoftheHolyTrinityintheDubrovnik antiphonerisalsoimportantproofthatthemanuscriptisaFranciscansource.InCodexF, therearetwoofficesfortheHolyTrinity,oneofthembeingalateraddition.Theoffice originallyfoundinthemanuscriptistheversifiedoffice,Sedentisupersolium from1279, attributedtoJohnPeckham.Theofficeisnotverycommon,especiallywhen accompaniedbymusic.TheotherofficefoundintheDubrovnikantiphoneris,infact,the earlier Gloriatibitrinitas office,from920,attributedtoStephen,bishopofLiège.The CANTUSindexoftheentireDubrovnikantiphonerhasbeenmade.Itisthefirst manuscriptfromCroatiatobeincludedinthedatabaseand,assuch,presentsan importantsteptowardstheinternationalrecognitionofthemedievalmusicalheritageof Croatia. 5:20AnettePapp TheantiphonsoftwogradualsfromSárospatakthatwererecentlyrepatriatedtoHungary TheProtestantCollegeinSárospatakwasfoundedin1531,accordingtotradition. ThelibraryopenedatthesametimeasthefoundationoftheCollege.Thecollection includesmanyvaluableprintedbooks,butthereweresignificantlossestoitinWWII, whenalmost180ofthemostvaluablevolumesinthelibraryweretakentoGorkyonthe Volga(moderndayNizhniyNovgorod).On11November1992,representativesof HungaryandtheRussianFederationagreedtothemutualreturnofculturalartefacts,and on21May1993,theydecidedtoestablishacommonRussianHungarianworking commission.AttheendofFebruary2006,aftermorethansixdecades,theidentified volumeswerereturnedtoHungary,amongthemthegradualsofCsati(1602)andPathay (earlyseventeenthcentury),whoseantiphonswillbediscussedinthispresentation. 5:40Discussion 7Dinner 8:30PM:InformalSession:Listening,andDiscussionofRecordings THURSDAYAugust27 ALLDAYEXCURSION,9AM7:30PM:Esztergom:CathedralLibrary,Christian Museums,Lunch,LatininaFranciscanChurch,ReturntoVisegrádby boatthentoDobogókıbybus. 7:30PMDinner FRIDAYAugust28 Officia sanctorum Chair:BarbaraHagghHuglo 9:00RomanHankeln SchwerterundPflugscharen:ZumReflexdesGeschichtlicheninderliturgischen EinstimmigkeitdesMittelalters DerHeiligenundReliquienkulthatnichtnurreligiöse,sondernauch profangeschichtlicheAspekte.DamitliegtdieFragenahe,welchenkonkreten WiderscheindieseAspekteinderLiturgieundderliturgischenMusikfürHeiligeund Reliquiengefundenhaben–unddamitvorallemindenHeiligenoffiziendesMittelalters, densogenannten Historiae undihrenGesängen.InwelchemhistorischenKontextstehen die Historiae ?WiewerdenAspektehistorischer,gesellschaftlichpolitischerRelevanzin ihnenreflektiert?Und:WelcheRollespieltdieMusikindiesemZusammenhang?Die MusikwissenschafthatdieseFragenbishernursehrseltenaufgegriffen,inder Historiographiespielen Historiae alshistorischeQuellenbisherkeinerleiRolle. DerVortragwirdsichdiesenFragenanhandzweierprominenterFallbeispiele nähern:der Historia zurEhreKarlsdesGroßen(117080)undder Historia zurEhreder KaiserinKunigunde(vor1280).NebenderFragenachdem„historischen“Inhaltder Historiae sollinsbesonderedieFragenachseinermusikalischenFormulierungim Vordergrundstehen.InteressantscheinthierinsbesonderedasVerhältnispräexistenter, traditionellerFormfaktorenzurhochmittelalterlichenmusikalischenRealisationzusein: InwieweitläßtsichetwabeiKontrafakturdiebedeutungsstiftendeRollemusikalischer Interpunktionaufgreifen?WiestelltsichdasVerhältnisvonpräexistentemVitentextzu FormundGehaltdesdaraufbasierendenGesangstextesdarundlassensichaufdemFeld derTextMusikInteraktiondieserspäten Historiae VeränderungenimHinblickaufdie VerfahrenklassischerGregorianikbeobachten? 9:25HenryParkes ThecompositionofEnglishsaints'officesinthetenthandeleventhcenturies RecentscholarshipontherepertoryoftenthandeleventhcenturyEnglishoffice compositionshasplacedstrongemphasisonmusicalandliterary style .DavidHiley (2001),forexample,describesthecommonmusicalfeaturesofspecifically‘nonrhymed’ Englishoffices,whileAndrewHugheshasregularlyusedthestylisticfeaturesof composition(includingversification,rhyme,modalorderandrhythmic cursus )asa meanstonavigatetherepertory.AlthoughJonsson(1968)hasarguedagainsttheuseof themisleadingterm‘rhymedoffice’,andBjörkvall/Haug(2000)havecriticisedthe tendencytocreateevolutionarystylisticnarratives,abasicquestionremains:howmighta medievalorclerichaveperceivedanoffice?Weretheauthorsandcomposersof suchworksawareofspecificstylistictrendsinofficecomposition,ordidtheydraw inspirationfromothermusicalandliterarysources? Synopticstudies,suchasHughes(1989,1993,1994),mayhavegiventhe impressionthattheearlyrepertoryofEnglishsaints’officeswaslargelyhomogeneous, butIintendtoshowthatthisisfarfromthecase.Whilemanuscriptsourcesofother officecompositionsmayhavebeenfreelyavailabletoaspiringofficecomposers,it appearsthattherewasnounifiedapproach.Officecompositionmaysimplyhavebeena vehicleforindividualcreativity,or,alternatively,perhapsthedevotionalnatureoftheact outweighedanywiderkindofartisticconsideration. IshallconsiderthesequestionswithdetailedreferencetotheofficeofSt. Edmund,aneleventhcenturycompositionfromBuryAbbey,aswellastotheother Englishofficesconfidentlydatabletothisperiod:thoseforSts.Cuthbert,Guthlac,Alban, BirinusandMildreth.Byconsideringthemusicaltreatmentofdifferentcompositional layersintheSt.Edmundoffice,Iwillattempttoshowhowstrikinglydifferentattitudes toofficecompositionmayhavecoexistedatBury,andintheEnglishrepertoryatlarge. 9:50PieterMannaerts AnewsourcefortheliturgicalofficeofSt.Vincent VincentofSaragossawasthefirstSpanishmartyrandknewanearlyveneration throughoutEurope.Aliturgicalofficeinhishonorwascomposed,probablyduringthe ninthorthetenthcentury.TheearliestsourcesstemfromtheAquitaineandToledo. Thispaperdiscussesarecentlydiscoveredsource,atenthoreleventhcenturyantiphoner fragmentfromTongeren(dioceseofLiège)foundintheTongerenCityArchives(BTOa StJacobsgasthuis61).Itarguesthatthenewsourceisimportantforourunderstandingof earlyprose historiae andtheirdisseminationthroughoutEuropeinatleasttworespects. First,theantiphonerfragmentrepresentsanimportantnewelementinthe transmissionoftheoffice.Thefragmentistheearliestsourceoftheofficefromthe regionnorthofParis,andpredatesnotonlytheantiphonersfromnorthernFranceand easternEuropeknowntoday,butalso(mostof)thequotationsofchantsfromtheoffice intheoreticaltreatises,suchasthe CommentariusinMicrologum ,the Quaestionesin musica ,orEliasSalomo’s Scientiaartismusicae . Second,thereisevidencefromthisandotherliturgicalsourcesinTongerento suggestthatthevenerationofVincentinTongerenmostlikelycamefromtheParisian abbeyofSt.GermaindesPrés.Adetailedstudyofthetextandmusicoftheoffice,and ofthearrangmentofthechantsinthefragment,allowustodatetheofficemore precisely. 10:15AndreaKovács UnofficiosconoscutodiSantoGerardodiCsanád Nel1083,periniziativadelreLadislaofuronocanonizzatiilreStephano,il principeEmerico,ilvescovoGerardoeglieremitiAndreaeBenedetto.Quasisubito cominciaval'elaborazionedegliufficideisantinuoviecosíallafinedelCinquecento quattrotradiloroavevanounoodueufficiritmicicompostiinUngheria.Finora sapevamocheperlafestadelpersonaggioquintodellacanonizzazionecumulativenon nacqueunufficioproprio.SecondoIfontiungheresieccettol'orazione,leletteree un'antifonaalMagnificatilcommunemartirefusuonatonelgiornodiGerardo.Questa ipotesiéstatainvalidatedallasopravvenienzadiunufficiocompletediGerardoinun breviariomedievalediZagreb.Alledomandeseguenticerchiamolarisposta:C'é relazionetral'ufficiounghereseequellovenezianouniconoto?Chefontifuerono utilizzatidalcompilatoredeltesto?Quando,doveeperchéfucompostoquestoufficio? 10:40Discussion 11CoffeeBreak Officia sanctorum (cont.) Chair:DebraLacoste 11:30DavidHiley ThechantsforSt.VerenaofZurzachandother historiae oftheLakeConstanceregion St.Verena(1September),whoendedherdaysatZurzachontheRhine,isa popularsaintinSwitzerland,butherliturgicalofficeispracticallyunknown.Itstexts wereeditedin AnalectaHymnica fromanunnotatedsource,theonlyoneknownuntil recently.Now,however,asecondsourcehasbeendiscovered,andthiscontainsallthe melodiesonstaffnotation.Inthepresentpaper,adiscussionofthe historia forSt.Verena leadsintoacomparativesurveyoftheproperofficespresentlyknownfromthearea aroundLakeConstance. 11:55SarahLong TheofficeoftheTranslationofSt.NicholasinfifteenthcenturyParisianconfraternity manuscripts ThestudyofParisiantradeanddevotionalconfraternityliturgiesinthelate fifteenthandearlysixteenthcenturieshasoftenbeenovershadowedbymusicological scholarshipfocusedonmajorecclesiasticalandmonasticinstitutions.Duetothis, numerousmonophonicmassesandofficesappearinginParisianconfraternity manuscriptshaveremainedvirtuallyunknown.Oneofthesesources,Bibliothèque Mazarine,MS464,wasproducedinthefifteenthcenturyfortheconfraternityofthe Grocers,whometatSt.Victor,anditcontainsamonophonicvotivemassandseveral officesinhonorofSt.Nicholas,theirpatronsaint.Theantiphonsandhymnsusedduring Vespers,MatinsandLaudsfortheofficeoftheTranslationofSt.Nicholasinthissource, whencomparedtothosefoundinmanuscriptandprintedservicebooksforthediocesan usage,showsthattheconfraternityoftheGrocershaddevelopedauniqueliturgical practicebasedonforeignandnewlycomposedmaterialthatwasinnowayconnectedto theorderofservicefollowedatNotreDameCathedralorinparishchurchesinthecity. SomeofthisspecializedmaterialisalsofoundinotherParisianconfraternity manuscripts,thusindicatingconventionsintheusageofnondiocesanchantsin confraternitydevotions.Whenthisdataisviewedincorrelationwiththepersonalcontact amongmembersofthesecommunitiesandotherorganizations,thestudyrevealshow officechantrepertoriestraveledatthetimeandillustratesthemultiplicityofliturgical practicesinthedioceseofParis. 12:20JamesBoyce (tobereadbyJamesBorders) Honoringoneoftheirown:theCarmeliteofficeofSt.AlbertofSicily AlbertofSicilywasthefirstCarmelitetobeveneratedasasaintwithintheOrder. BorninTrapani,Sicilyaround1240,AlbertenteredtheCarmelitemonasterythereand wasordainedin1289;bythetimeofhisdeathinMessina,Sicily,on7August,1307,he hadalreadyacquiredareputationforsanctity,whichwaslatercommemoratedinhis vita andliturgicalcelebrations. AproperfeastforAlbertwasonlyestablishedbytheGeneralChapterofBonnof 1411,whichlegislatedthatitbecelebratedasa duplex onthedayofSt.Donatus,thatis, 7August;Albertwastobecelebratedasaconfessornotabishop,withalltheofficetexts tobetakenfromthecommonuntilaproperofficecouldbedeveloped.PopeCallistusIII approvedhiscultin1457,andPopeSixtusIVratifieditinhisbull Caelestisaulae militum of31May1476.TextsforaproperofficeforAlbertcameevenlater,sincehis vita wasonlywrittenbyJoannesMariaPoluciis(d.1505),aCarmeliteoftheMantuan congregation,in1499.Thisrhymedoffice, OAlbertenormamunditie ,wascomposed fromtextsbasedonthe vita ,whilethehymnswerewrittenbytheCarmeliteBlessed BaptistofMantua. Sowellrespectedwasthisofficethatitstexts,andperhapssomeofitsmusic, continuedtobeusedaftertheCouncilofTrent.UsingtextsfromaprintedCarmelite breviaryof1495andmusicfromsurvivingearlymodernliturgicalmanuscripts,thepaper willdemonstratehowtheCarmelitesshapedtheliturgyofSt.Albert,andhowtheyused itasamodelfortheirownspirituallifeinthelaterMiddleAgesandearlymodernperiod. 12:45Discussion 1Lunch Liturgical sounds; liturgical drama Chair:AnnaVildera 2:30ThomasLászlóCsanády :Onthemeaningofcymbalsinthedailylifeandliturgy oftheCanonsRegularintheHighMiddleAges Cymbalsinantiquityweresmall,concaveplatesofcopperorbronzeusedas percussioninstrumentsinconnectionwiththetempleservice.Theywerehandheldor fixedtoshortwoodenbarsandplayedbyonehand.Sometimes cymbala arementioned asnothingbutakindofdiscofsomehardwoodormetal,usedlikeagong. Thedescriptionoftheinstrumentgoesbacktotheecclesiasticalwritersofthe earlyChristiancenturies,likeAugustine,andwasoftenreproducedbylatermedieval writers.Theilluminationsofmanuscriptsfromthetenthcenturyonwardsshowusthat theMiddleAgesappliedthewordtolittlebellswithoutaclapper,whichwerestruckbya smallhammer. Amongothermedievalhandwrittensources,the Consuetudines ofthe AugustinianCanonsRegularofKlosterrath(nowadaysRolducintheNetherlands),as wellassomemanuscriptsfromSeckauinUpperStyriainAustria(todayattheUniversity LibraryofGraz)fromthetwelfthandthirteenthcenturies,revealtheuseofcymbalsin thedailylifeofreligiouscommunities. 2:55NilsHolgerPetersen, Drama,liturgyandperformativity:The ludusmagnus (c. 1205)inHenryofLivonia’schronicle HenryofLivonia’sthirteenthcenturychronicleaboutChristianizingeffortsinthe Balticregioncontainsashortdescriptionofa ludusmagnus ,a ludusprophetarum ordinatissimus usedformissionarypurposes.Althoughtheaccountonlygivesvague informationsabouttheplayanditsperformance,thedescriptionissuggestiveinthe contextof‘liturgicaldrama’,bringingwithitassociationstotheterm ordoprophetarum and–becauseoftherepresentationofarmiesandwarsinthe ludusmagnus –tothe ludus deAntichristo .Inthepaper,Ishalldiscussthementionedpassagefromthechroniclein thelightofothercontemporaryevidence,involvingalsostatementsandcriticisms concerningdramaticrepresentationatthetimeintheMedievalLatinChurch,e.g.by PopeInnocentIII. HenryofLivonia’smentionedpassagealsoraisesquestionsconcerning performative aspectsinthedescribedevent.Takingthisexampleasapointofdeparture, andbringinginErikaFischerLichte’smoderntheoryofperformativity,Ishallwidenthe perspectivetoageneraldiscussionofperformativityindevotionalceremoniesofthe MedievalLatinChurch. 3:20StefanEngels ZumWesenliturgischerSpiele DieGrenzezwischenRitusundSpielimMittelalterscheintfließendzusein. LiturgieselbstkannbereitsalsheiligesSpielaufgefasstwerden.Dennochunterscheiden sichliturgischeSpieleentscheidendvomRitusselbst.LiturgischeDramen(wiedie berühmte„visitatiosepulchri“,dasOsterspielamEndedesMorgenoffiziumsdes Ostersonntages)wachsenausdenliturgischenProzessionenverschiedenenTypsheraus. LiturgischeProzessionen(v.a.Lichtmess,Palmsonntag,symbolischeGrablegungund AufnahmeeinesKreuzeswährendderKarliturgie, visitatiosepulchri )scheinenim GegensatzzuanderenUmgängenwiedenProzessionenamMarkustagoderandendrei TagenvorChristiHimmelfahrtdurchausSpielcharakterzuhaben,wenndiesauch kontroversdiskutiertwird.SieerinnertenaneinebestimmteBegebenheit(z.B.den EinzugJesuinJerusalemamPalmsonntag)undvergegenwärtigtensichdurchbestimmte dramatisierteElementewiesymbolischeHandlungen,GestenoderGesänge.Findenwir hierNährbodenfürdasliturgischeSpiel? ÄußeresKennzeichendafür,dassessichbeimliturgischenDramaumeinSpiel innerhalbderLiturgieundnichtmehrumeinesymbolischeHandlunginnerhalbdesRitus handelt,istindenRubrikenderliturgischenBücherdieBezeichnungmitkonkreten Personennamen.Soistinder visitatiosepulchri beidenangeführtenGesängenvon „mulieres“dieRede,ebensovon„angelus“,von„Petrus“und„Johannes“;dieSpielrolle undnichtmehrdieDarstellerwerdenbezeichnet.DennochsindliturgischeSpiele durchausTeilederoffiziellenLiturgie,siewerdeninliturgischenBüchern(Libri ordinarii,RitualiaundProzessionalia)aufgezeichnet,ihreDurchführungist verpflichtend. Davonstrengzuunterscheidensinddiesogenannten“Mysterienspiele”des spätenMittelalters.SieverwendenzwarTexteausderLiturgie,sindabervonihr unabhängig.MysterienspieletretendieNachfolgederliturgischenSpieleineiner verändertenGesellschaftan:nichtmehrderKlerus,sonderndieBürgersindTrägerder Spiele,dieandenHauptfestendesKirchenjahresaufgeführtwerden,etwainTirol.Die SpielebestehenausgesprochenenTexten,enthaltenaberauchGesängeindramatisierter Form,diederLiturgieentlehntsindunddasSpielumrahmen.Eshandeltsichdabeinicht umTheaterinunseremSinn,sondernumeineMeditationbzw.Auslegungder EvangeliumsperikopederMessedesjeweiligenFesttages,istalsowiedasliturgische SpieleinreligiöserAkt.NichtzuletztwirdaufdieseWeiseeineBrückezurückzuden antikenMysterienspielengeschlagen. 3:45CoffeeBreak 4 Preorganized session: Dialogic texts in CoordinatorandChair:AnnaVildera ,introducedbyNilsHolgerPetersen Introduction Notonlydothesocalledliturgicaldramascontaintextsindialogue.Theyare alsofoundinotherformularies(officesofsaints)orforms(Passion).Particularexamples (antiphons,responsories)ofGregorianchantmaybeconsidered,evenifnotproperly, potentialliturgicaldramas,becauseoftheirtextswhichcomposeorpresupposea dialogue. Therefore,thissessionintendstorepositionresearchoninstanceswithdialogic textsinGregorianchantthatareclosetothoseinliturgicaldramas,inordertosurveythe dramaticattitudeofthemedievalcomposersonadifferentiatedrangeofexamples. Thefirstofthesubjectsdiscussedarechantformsandformulariesthatdonotbelong properlytodramaticoffices;thenliturgicaldramaisconsidered,withthesecondaryaim ofobservingthedistance(orthecloseness)betweenthesetwoformaldivisions,'chant' and'drama'.Thepaperscombinespecificcriticalconsiderations(thedefinitionofthe RomanPassiontone,thetraditionofthechantforSt.Apollinaris,theofficeofSt.Daniel, priestandmartyr,theHungariantraditionofthe Officiumstellae ,andPaduanliturgical dramas),withthecommonpresenceofdialogictexts.Thisvarietyofthemesisexpressly wishedandrespondstothewilltofacethemainsubjectofthesessionfromdifferent pointsofview. Part1.Normalformsandformularies (1)Thegospel Passio isoneofthemostclassicexamplesofadialogicliturgicaltext: settingGuidetti’s tonusPassionis inawiderItaliancontext,DiegoToigowilltryto clarifyitsrelationshipwiththepresent tonusRomanus andtounderline,byacomparison withothersources,thespaceopentothedramaticperformanceofChrist’ssufferingon theCross. (2)CristinaDiZiodevotesherattentiontoonlyoneantiphonincludedintheofficeofSt. Apollinaris,thepatronsaintof:thissingleantiphon,atakeypointofthe legenda relatedtothesaint,ispresentedasdirectspeech,andthatrevealsitsdialogic direction.Soitbecomesfundamentaltospecifythewaybywhichthischantislinked withitscontext. (3)AnnaVilderaarguesthattheofficeofSt.Daniel,aminorpatronsaintofPadua, appliesdialogicnarrativeparameterstoallitsparts:itisanotherexampleofastandard hagiographicstorythatmighteasilybetransformedintoadramaticoffice. Part2.Specialformularies:liturgicaldramas (4)Toapproachsuchawellknownliturgicaldramaasthe Officiumstellae andits variants,NausicaMorandi,besidestreatingthissubjectwithphilologicalcare,focuseson anelementinthedramathatissometimesdevelopedfurther:thisisthefigureofthe ,recurringinmanyexamplesofliturgicalandnotstrictlyliturgicaldrama. (5)Thelastpaper,readbyLanfrancoMenga,concludesthesessionwithconcrete instancesofdramaticofficesthatwererecentlyperformed,whichintroducemany problemsconnectedwiththedifferencesbetweenpastandpresentlocation,ofrestoring partsthatareonlynamedinthemanuscripts,andofreplacingchantssung cumorgano withoutanyotherindicationbuttherubric. Individualpapers 4:00DiegoToigo TheRomanPassiontone:fromGuidetti'sedition(1586)tothenew Editiotypica(1917) GiovanDomenicoGuidetti’s CantusecclesiasticusPassionis waseditedinRome in1586byAlessandroGardano.Thework,consideredanimportantsourceofthe authenticRomanPassiontone,hadimmediatefameinItalyandovertheAlps;itwas oftenreprintedinthecourseofthefollowingcenturies,andbymeansofthePustet editions,itsurvivedintothebeginningofthetwentiethcentury.Finally,in1917,itwas setasideasaspuriousandlatetone,infavourofanewandpresumedauthenticRoman Passiontone,whichwasstudiedinSolesmesandpublishedamongthenewVatican EditionsbythedecreeofPopeBenedictXV.Thispapercontributestothedefinitionof theRomanPassiontone,reconsideringGuidetti’sworkinlightofwhatemergesfroma widerrecognitionofnotatedsourcesofthePassionbetweenthelateMiddleAgesandthe sixteenthcentury,inRomeandItaly.Inparticular,itappearsthatGuidetti’sPassiontone, contrarilytotheotheroneof1917,caneasilybesituatedwithinanItaliantraditionto whichfourteenthandfifteenthcenturysourcesalreadytestify. Asfarasthemelodicbehavioroftherecitativeisconcerned,wecannoticein Guidetti’stoneacertaintendencytomelodicornamentationinpunctuationformulae. ThisisnotevidentinthenewRomantonethatwasstudiedatSolesmes.Ontheother hand,wehavenoevidenceintheoriginalGuidettitoneofthosedramaticamplifications thatareconnectedtothenarrationofthecrucifixionanddeathofChrist,whichwere imputedbyscholarsatSolesmestothebadtasteofthedecadentcenturies.Those dramaticevents,soemphasizedinotherItaliantraditions,arerathersimplyandsoberly deliveredinGuidetti'stone. 4:40CristinaDiZio TheOfficeofSt.Apollinarisinthemanuscript'Nn'ofFonteAvellana St.ApollinarisistheprincipalpatronsaintofRavenna.Thelegendthathewas sentbySt.Petertoevangelizethatareaandtofoundanewchurch,ofwhichhewas bishopandmartyr,wasalwaysbelievedtobeatruestory.The‘Passio’writteninthe seventhcenturyisbasedonthisfactandonmiraclesheproduced.Thetextoftheoffice, whichsurvivesineleventhandtwelfthcenturyantiphonersrelatedtoRavenna,showsa numberoftextualparallelswiththe Passio . TheworshipofSt.ApollinarisspreadthroughoutItaly,andforthisreason,itis possibletofindchantsforthissaintinmanuscriptsfromVenice,Florence,Romeand Benevento.Theofficewritteninthosesourcesshowsdifferencesinsometextsandtheir order;nevertheless,eachonecontainsthedramaticantiphonthatreechoesthemandate ofSt.Peter:'Surge,accipeSpiritumSanctumsimulquepontificatum,etpergeadurbem quevocaturRavenna'.Ourcomparisonofthesesourcesdemonstratesanewapproachto thestudyofthetextsandmusicofthisoffice.Thestudyofthedramaticaspectsisrelated particularlytothelongOfficeforSt.Apollinarisinmanuscript'Nn'fromtheArchiveof themonasteryofFonteAvellana. 5:05AnnaVildera DramaticframesintheofficeofSt.Daniel, levitaetmartyr ofPadua TheofficesofsaintsarenotonlyaliturgicalexpressionofChristiandevotion,or amere historia ofpeoplewhoselifeispresentedtothebelieversasamodeltofollow. Thankstoanorganiccombinationoftextandmusic,sectionsoftheoffice(forinstance: 1.antiphon adMagnificat offirstVespers, adBenedictus , adMagnificat ofsecond Vespers;2.Matinsantiphons;3.MatinsresponsoriesandLaudsantiphons)offerdifferent kindsofliturgicaldrama,wheretheteller’sstoryisenrichedbydialoguesthatare generallydrawnfromthe Passiones or Vitaesanctorum . Theofficeof Daniellevita ,Paduan martyr (IPcB14,beginningofthe fourteenthcentury),mayexemplifythispointofview,becauseitcontainsthreedifferent versionsofapotentialliturgicaldrama.Furthermore,insomecasesitisquiteevidentthat thetextguidesthecomposerofthemusictoutterdramaticgestures:inordertoprove this,somelevelsofconnectionbetweentextandmusicwillbeinvestigated,mainly relatedtochoicesofmelodicstyleandofthetonalsignificanceofsinglenotesor patterns.Indeed,theorganizationofanormalliturgicaloffice,completelylackingin scenicapparatus,butalsoveryclosetoasacreddramawithmusic,mighthaveactually developeda'format'thatwouldlastintimeandstimulatethelatercomposersofthe oratorio. 5:30NausicaMorandi Györ's Officiumstellae withinaEuropeannetworkofdramas ThispaperexaminestherelationshipbetweentheHungarian Officiumstellae traditionofGyör,ofsignificanceforitsownpeculiaritiesandgeographicposition,and otherlinkedEuropeantraditions.ThecomparisonshowsGyör’selementsoforiginality andnovelty,connectionstoothersources,andsimilaritiesanddifferencesintextual, musical,liturgicalanddramaturgicalplansinteractingwitheachother. Inasystemofsynchronicanddiachroniccomparisons,Iintendtopresent considerationsabouttexttradition,asynopsisofthechants’successionandmusical analysis,takingtheproblemsofadiastematicsourcesintoconsideration. Thedramaticplotanddramaturgicaltiesareconsideredfromparticularrubrics, an'intertextual'notationbeyondnotationthatisfundamentalnotonlyforrepresentation, butalsoforgivingprescriptionsfor:musicalexecution,expressivemimiccodes, characters’rulesandtheircharacterization,theatricalcostumeanditsconnotations, scenicsubcodes,overcodingofvoiceprojection,proxemicandkinesiccodes. SpecialattentionwillbegiventochantsaddedinthemarginsofGyör’s Officium stellae thathavecoeval,latertraditions(fromBilsen,Freising,Fleury,Rouen),andthey alsoincludeGospelsandscripture.Finally,assumptionsaboutthemusicalanddramatic meaningofchantsaddedinthedrama'sframeworkwillbeformulated. 5:55LanfrancoMenga RealizzareoggiunDrammaliturgico Laripropostaintempimodernidegliufficidrammaticipadovani(IPcC55,C56, sec.XIVXV)poneunaseriediproblemidivarianatura.Inprimoluogosiponela questionedeiluoghiedeglispazidautilizzare:infatti,comesipuòricavaredalle indicazionidel liberordinarius dellacattedralediPadova(IPcE57,terzoquartodel XIIIsecolo),gliufficisonostatipensatieprogrammatiperunarealizzazioneche prevedevailcoinvolgimentodimoltispazi:lasacrestiadeicanonici,ilchiostro,il battisteroedalcunecappellelaterali.Laprofondatrasformazionediquestispaziavvenuta inepocarinascimentalehacompletamentestravoltolasituazionerendendodifatto impossibileunaripropostapuraesemplicedeidrammiliturgici“comeeranoedove erano”.Sirendequindinecessariounripensamentodelleazionisceniche,nonsolodelle processioni,maanchedellevereazionidrammatiche,chenelMedioevotendevanoanon coinvolgerel’altaremaggioreconilrelativopresbiterio,masoprattuttoalcunecappelle laterali. Questasituazionefasorgereunadomandalegittima:chipotevarealmente ‘vedere’questeazionisceniche?Insostanza,chieranoirealidestinatariefruitoridi questadrammatizzazione? Dallaletturadellerubrichesembrachiarocheiveridestinatarinonfosseroifedeli bensìgli“attori”,cioèilclerostessonellesuevariecomponenti(vescovo,canonici, chierici, pueri ,etc.),cheavariotitoloeraprotagonistaedestinatariodegliuffici drammatici. Unarealizzazioneintempimodernidevequinditenercontoanchediquesto problema,inquantogliattualifruitorisonodistintidagliesecutoriequestocomportaun ripensamentodeglispazieduncondizionamentonotevolenellarealizzazionescenica.Le immaginipropostepossonomegliofarcomprenderealcunesoluzionipossibili,tenendo contodelfattocheènecessariocambiaretalisoluzioniasecondadelluogoincuisi realizzaconcretamentel’azionescenica. 6:20Discussion 7Dinner SATURDAYAugust29 Early Medieval France Chair:CharlesAtkinson 9:00Rev.JeromeF.Weber GallicanchantbeforetheOktoechos(withwrittenresponsebyMichelHuglo) TworecentrecordingshavefocusedattentiononthesurvivalofGallicanchantsin thepostCarolingianrepertoire: 1.DomJeanClaire’sarticleonmodalityof1975hasnotreceivedextensiveevaluation, asLászlóDobszaypointedoutin1995.DomClaire’sdiscussionofhistheorywith ThomasForrestKelly,“Modalityinwesternchant:anoverview,”appearedin andMedievalMusic in2008.Oneofthefewattemptstoillustratehisargumenton recordsis“Quandlechantgrégoriens’appelaitchantmessin.”Therecording,bythe ScolaMetensisunderMarieReineDemollière,presentsgroupsofchantsonthe cordede re,cordededo and cordedemi ,thefirstofthesebeingofpurportedlyGallicanorigin. 2.FredSchneyderberg,writingbookletnotesforarecordingtitled'CantusGallicanus', describes'anewmethodforrediscoveringtheGallicantradition'.Hestatesthatuntil recently,Gallicanchantswereidentifiedaccordingtoextramusicalcriteria,suchas provenance.HeproposesidentifyingGallicanchantsbytheirtonalcharacteristics.The ScholaTrunchiniensisunderFransMarimansingsavarietyofchantstoexemplifythe argument. 9:25MaritHøye TwoearlyKyriechants Kyrie39andKyrie55aretwooftheearliestnotatedKyriechants.Bothhave manuscriptconcordancesinthefirsthalfofthetenthcentury.Thetwomelodiesshare somemelodicfeatures,butpreviousresearchdiffersintheviewontheirrelationship. PeterWagner(1921)regardedKyrie39andKyrie55astwoversionsofthesame melody,whileDavidBjork(1977)dismissedthisviewonthebasisofstylisticand historicalevidence.Thispaperwillexploretherelationshipbetweenthemelodiesfurther. DavidBjorksingledoutKyrie55withtheLatintext TibiChristesupplices and describedthechantas'…probablyoneoftheoldestKyriesweknownow'(Bjork1981,p. 16).BjorksuggestedthatKyrie55mighthavebeenwrittenasearlyastheendofthe ninthcentury(seealsoBjork1977,p.218andBjork2003,p.102).RichardCrockeralso placedthisKyrieintheninthcenturyandstatedthatKyrie55wastheonlyKyrieinthe knownrepertorythatdatedfrombeforeitssplitintoEastandWestFrankishparts (Crocker1990,p.276).AndersEkenberg(1987,p.48)placedKyrie55, TibiChriste supplices ,intheninthcenturybyreferringtoBjork'swork.DavidHileyaddednuanceto thisview:'Itisnotcleariftheresurviveamongtheoldestrecordedmelodiesany compositionsfromearliercenturies'(Hiley1993,p.152).However,heallowedforthe possibilitythatthethreeKyriesKyrie55,Kyrie68andKyrie155mightbeofan olderorigin(Hiley1996,p.837). TherelationshipbetweenKyrie39andKyrie55isparticularlyinteresting,dueto theproposedstatusofKyrie55asoneoftheoldestsurvivingKyriechants.Thus,this discussionoftheirrelationshiphaspossibleimplicationsforamoregeneralviewofthe melodicshapeoftheKyriechantaswell. 9:55RobertBernagiewicz Sometracesofthe‘Enchiriadis’systeminthe Justusutpalma graduals Westillcannotreconstructtheentireearlyhistoryofthegroupofsecondmode gradualsandsaymuchabouttheoriginofitsmelodicmaterialwithcertitude.According toscholars,responseswerecomposedinGaullaterthanversesormighthavealsobeen Gallicancompositions.Thesecondsuppositionissupportedbytheexistenceofsome tracesofthe‘Enchiriadis’tonalsystemthatIhavediscoveredinthemelodiesofsuch responses. Fromtheverybeginningofdiastemacy,the Justusutpalma gradualswere notatedintransposition:onthefinal la ,ortwowholetonesunderthefinal re ,becauseof aspecificmodalstructure(twowholetonesunderthefinal re ).Thenotationin transpositionpermittedtheavoidanceofBflat,whichwasoutsideoftheGuidonian system.ThegradualGraz807istheonlymanuscripttonotateBflatwithoutchanges. Thisgradualappliesalettersign'B'beforetheneumes.Havingthispossibility,thescribe couldwriteallofthesecondmodegradualsontheoriginallevel–onthefinalre.Other earlydiastematicmanuscriptshavefounddifferentsolutionsfortheproblematicnotes. TheolderAquitanianandBeneventanmanuscriptsplacetheproblematicnotes'two spaces'underthefinalnote.Infact,thenoteswerenot'problematic'forthecopyistswho werenotusingkeysignatures:inthosedays,copyistsdidnotthinkaccordingtothe Guidonianstaff,whichimposedexactpitchlevels.OnelaterAquitanianmanuscript– Yrx903–changesBbsystematicallytoA(surelyacopyistthinksofsecondmode gradualsas relevelcompositions). Thetranspositionalnotationofourgradualshad'lateral'effects.Itchangedthe melodicstructureoftheupperoctaveofresponses:Bnaturalinthefinalmelisma becomesBflat(fa)whentransposedbyafifth.Thereisproofthatoriginallythepitchin thefinalmelismawasindeedBnaturalandnotBflat.TheonlytonalsystemwithBflat intheloweroctaveandBnaturalintheupperoctaveisthedaseianmusicalsysteminthe describedin Musicaenchiriadis .Areconstructedmelodyoftheresponseofthe Justusut palma gradualsfitsthedaseiansystemperfectly.Thus,themelodywaslikelycomposed intheoldGallicanmodalsystem–arealmusicalsystemandnotatheoreticalone.It meansthatthemelodicmaterialofthe Justusutpalma gradual'sresponseis,withoutfail, ofGallicanorigin. Thesefindingsaboutapiecebasedstrictlyonthedaseianmusicalsystem demonstratethatwhatwasformerlyunderstoodasapurelytheoreticalsysteminfact suppliedpracticalapplications.Myresearchfindingsarealsoacontributiontotheearly historyofthemassrepertory. 10:20Discussion 10:30CoffeeBreak Patterns and maps Chair:ChristianTroelsgård 11PavlosErevnidis ExploringHagiopolitantopoi:vocabulariesandpatternsofexplanations Anycomprehensiveandongoingcomprehensionofamedievaltheoreticaltreatise mustincludeanintertextualapproachinordertorevealitswiderrhetoricalenvironment. Thisenvironmentconsistsofaparticularvocabulary(orvocabularies)andofpatternsof explanation(i.e.,standardphraseologicalunitsfordescribingmusicalorother phenomena),aswascharacteristicofthemedieval'artofthinking'.Wecanusethese patternsofexplanationofasourcein useful ways(evenifatfirstwedonotunderstand theiroriginalmeanings),forexample,ascommunicationpointswithothermedieval disciplines.Inthisway,thepatternsprovideabasisforunderstandingtheoriginalcontent andthedegreeofintraculturalconsciousnesstherein.Onasecondlevel,wecanexploit themasconceptualunitsofatradition,whichnecessarilyhaveachronologythatpermits theinvestigationofearlierstages(ordifferentgeographies)ofsuchatradition. Thefourteenthcenturymanuscript,Paris,Bibliothèquenationale,ancienfonds grec360,containsatreatiseonmusictheory,knownastheHagiopolítes,whichverbally correlatesitscontentwiththeecclesiasticalenvironmentofJerusalem(HagíaPólis,the HolyCity).Itseemsthatthematerialofthistreatiserepresentsaparticulartheoretical domaininmedievalmusicnotonlyofByzantineculturalgeography.SincetheParis manuscriptrepresentsthelaststageofthistradition,Ichoosetoisolateitfromotherlate Byzantinemusictheoreticalwritings(whichmayrepresentdifferenttheoreticalstreams) andtoconsideritsvocabularyandexplanationpatternswithinawidercontext,thatofthe variedEasternandWesternmedievalscholarlyenvironments.Ihopetherebytodetect earlierlayersofthistraditionandtodistinguishitshistoricalgeography. 11:25AlexejJaropolov Fromorbittolandscapethedeploymentoftheoktoechos ('Orbit'usedasatermfromgrouptheoryinmathematics.Example:ifgroupGactsonsetX,theorbitof elementxofXisthesetofelementsofXtowhichxcanbemovedbytheelementsofG.IfbothGandX arefinite[liketheplanetatthecenterofanastronomicalorbit]thenthesizeofanyorbitisafactorofthe orderofthegroupGbytheorbitstabilizertheoremandthesetofallorbitsisdenotedbyX/G.) OneofthemajorRussiantheoreticalsourcesfromtheseventeenthcentury, manuscript#219of'Pevcheskoesobranije',acollectionintheStateHistoricalMuseum inMoscow,containsthefollowingwords:'thereareseven pometa’s [pitchsignswhose relationshiptoascaleisunknown](akindof martiria [inByzantinenotation,signatures givingthepitchtoasinger]):theygivedirectmeasuring soglasijas [theyindicatethe regularassociationsofdegreesinthetrichords],whicheachcontainthree pomety's , because pometa " nash "convergeswith pometa"pokoj ",and pometa"tochka "with pometa"vedi "[namesforthe pomety's ]'. Inthisratherobscurephrase,onerecognizesoneoftheparadigmatictopicsof musictheorythereconciliationofdiatonicandoctachords(triphoniaand heptaphonia),andtherelatedproblemsofthemutualdispositionofauthenticandplagal modes.Thenarrowambitusoftheformulasthatwerecharacteristicofmonophonic Znamennychant,andthetechniqueswhereby pometa's areidentifiedwithoneanother, resemblingGuidonianmutations,seemtomaskthefollowingconflicttheliteral meaningoftheneumealwaysimpliesthepossibilityoftranspositionupafourth(as suggestedbythetreatises)orupanoctave(asresultsfromperformancepractice). Moreover,theresultingaccumulationoftheresultsofthesetwotypesoftranspositions, upwardsanddownwards(asissuggestedbytheadditionalspecificationsof pometa's , whichoccurfrequently),runsthroughallpossiblemeaningsprovidedbythegiven(e.g. Guidonian)scale. Inthiscontext,thetotalityofthepossiblemeaningsoftheneumealwayslooks likeanorbiteverypitchcanbe'reached'fromanyotherpitchbyafinitenumberof transpositions.Ontheotherhand,ifthepossibilityofenharmonicequality(F=Esharp etc.)isprovided,itisalwayspossibletoreturntoastartingpitchthatconstantlymoves forwards,i.e.withoutanyregressionhence'theorbit'.Mathematicianswouldsaythat thesetofpitchesis'closedundertheoperationoftranspositions'.Thatwouldmake decipheringofthekriuks/kryuks[English:'hook',heremeaningZnamennyneumes]at leasttheoreticallyfeasible.Yetnobodyknowsexactlywhichscalewasusedbythe Znamennysingers,atleastbeforetheseventeenthcentury,anditisdoubtfulthatthey wouldadhereconsistentlytothesamescale,evenwithinthesame'composition',thus nobodycan'provide'thepossibilityofenharmonicequality. So,ifoneweakenstherequirementoftheliteralmeaningoftheneumeand restrictsoneselftothediscoveryofthesetofpossibleorbits(thatwouldnotcontradict theZnamennynotation),thenthemelodicsubstrateunderlyingthegraphicsignswould beconceivedofasanorderedensembleofdifferent,butrelatedscales,ratherthanasone singlescale.Itmayweakenthestatementsaboutsinglekriuks,yettheircombinations wouldlookmorepredictableandcomprehensible.Itwouldalsofacilitatethecomparison ofRussianmedievalmusictheorystatementswiththemethodsofother'medieval' disciplines,dealingwithnotionsoftimeandmeasurementtentatively,ofcourse.For example,thesocalled Velikijmirotvornyjkrug ( megalaindiction )['GreatCosmogony Circle('big'indiction)]=theEasterindicationinatimespanof532years)insomeofits representationsdisplaysaffinitywiththeKoukouzelianwheel;thesocalled vrutselet ,a mnemotechnicalinstrument,whichassistswiththereckoningofthedateofEasterand usesphalanxes[fingerbones]inawaysimilartothatofGuido[eachphalanxrepresentsa positioninthedecimalsystemdecimals,hundreds,thousands,etc.Thelefthandstands forthelunarcycleof19years;therighthandforthesolarcycleof28years]. Thefateofhereticalastrologytreatisesinsixteenthandseventeenthcentury Russia,andthekeyroleofmnemotechnicalmeansinsemioralculturesmakethis analogyuseful.ThecomparisonofSlavonicandByzantine oktaicha ( Thearhioneumati Bogonachal’nymmanoveniyem )chantsthat'surf'throughallmodes,demonstratesa certainselectivityinthebehaviorofthemodes.Thatleadstoconclusionsaboutthe possibleorbitsofthekriuks. Performance Questions Chair:GáborKiss 11:50GeertMaessen Musicnotationforperformingtenthcenturychant Severalnotationsareavailabletothemodernperformerwhoseekstorecreatethe soundoftenthcenturychant.Theaimofthispaperistodiscusstheusabilityofthe extantoptionsandtointroduce,forthefirsttimeinaninternationalcontext,anoriginal notationalsystemcalledFluxus.Itshallbearguedthatthelatternotation,whichhasbeen underdevelopmentsince1996,offersanunprecedentedamountofhistoricaldetailtothe chantsinger. Fortheperformanceoftenthcenturychant,thereappeartobetwomajor problems.First,tenthcenturysourcesdonotprovidedefinitepitchesand,second,the meaningofspecificdetailsoftheirnotationisnotalwaysclear.Hence,singingdirectly fromthesesourcesisnoviableoption,whilethelatermedievalsourcesomittenth centurydetail. Thereappeartobetwotypesofeditionsforperformingtenthcenturychant, which,asIshallargue,eachpresentdifficultiesofvarioussorts.First,wehaveeditions insquare(ormodern)notationwithaddedtenthcenturyneumes,suchasthe Graduale Triplex (1979).Second,wehaveeditionsinwhichsquare(ormodern)notationisadapted accordingtospecificinterpretationsofchant,asinthe GradualeLagal (1984). IntroducingFluxus,Ishalldemonstratehowthisnotationalsystempresentstenth centuryneumesonstaves.Iarguethatthesuggestivestrengthoftenthcenturyneumesis herepreservedinanotationthatalsorepresentsdefinitepitches.Whileonesings,the neumescanbeinterpretedwithouttheobtrusiveinterferenceoftheory.Pitchesand neumescometogetherascloseastheymighthaveinthetenthcentury. ForachantperformancefromFluxus,seetheensembleGregorianaatYouTube, http://www.gregoriana.nl/0218liverecordings.htm 12:20KarinS.Lagergren MonasticliturgicalsingingaftertheSecondVaticanCouncil Thispaperpresentstheresultsofanethnomusicologicalinvestigationaboutthe contemporaryuseandfunctionofliturgicalsingingin21Catholicmonasterieswith emphasisonGregorianchant.ThemonasteriesarelocatedinSweden,Italy,France,the Netherlands,GreatBritainandNorway. TheSecondVaticanCouncilgaverisetoamultitudeofnewliturgicalstrategies, whichfallintothreemaincategories:1.tocontinuetosingtheGregorianmelodieswith LatintextsastheyappearintheeditionsfromSolesmes,2.tosingGregorianmelodiesto vernaculartextswiththemelodiesadaptedslightlytotheaccentuationofthevernacular, 3.tosingnewlycomposedmusictotextsinthevernacular.Inreality,thesecategories areoftenmixed.Monasteriesfollowingcategory1arefew,buttheyareimportantin shapingtheideologyaroundmonasticGregorianchantinLatin. Twothemeswillbediscussedinthispaper.Thefirstistheprocessofre Gregorianization.SeveralmonasteriesthatstoppedsingingGregorianchantcompletely orpartiallyafterVaticanIIaretodayintheprocessofreintroducingpartsoftheliturgyin LatinassungtoGregorianmelodies,mainlyduringthemassandonfeastdays.Their reasonsforthis,aswellasthewayinwhichtheyrealizeit,willbediscussed.Thesecond themediscussedconcernsdifferentcontemporaryapproachestoadaptingmusicto vernaculartexts.Afewapproaches,mainlyfromSwedenandGreatBritain,willbe discussed. 12:45Announcements 1Lunch BusTransfertoBudapest Shortbiographiesofparticipants: ThomasCsanady StaffmemberattheCenterfortheStudyofPrintedandWrittenHeritage(ZEBS)ofthe KarlFranzensUniversityofGraz,andstaffmemberoftheUniversityLibraryofGrazin chargeofSpecialCollectionsofpapers.Studiesintheologyandpostgraduatestudiesin informationtechnologyandlibrarianshipinGrazandVienna.Ph.D.inthemedieval historyofliturgy.ResearchontheliturgicaloriginofthedioceseofSeckau. OliverGerlach StudiedinHeidelberg,BaselandBerlin(HumboldtUniversity).In2000,hefounded EnsembleIsontoexploreimprovisedformslikefloridorganum (arsorgani) andseveral formsusedinkalophonicchant.DuringfieldresearchinBulgaria,theensemble’ssingers couldlearnfromtraditionalsingers.OliverGerlach’sresearchmethodscombinefield researchandperformancepracticewithhistoricalstudies,includingpaleographicstudies. InhisPh.D.dissertationof2006,entitled“IntheOktōēchosLabyrinth”,heapproachesa certaintendencyinEastern(kalophōnia)andWesternchant(organum)tofindamodeon everypitchofthescale.Thepaperofthisconferenceisrelatedtothecoordinationof comparativestudiesplannedintheHalkēSoundCentre,whichcollaborateswith traditionalsingersfromTurkeyandGreece. GeertMaessen FinishedstudiesinArchitectureandPhilosophy.In1982,hewasintroducedtoGregorian ChantbytheBenedictinemonksofMamelisintheNetherlands.HesanginWimvan Gerven'sScholainAmsterdamfrom1986to2006.Geertproducesbraillescoresforthe blindandinventedaninternationallyrecognisedbraillestandardforchant.In1996,he inventedthenoninterpretativeFluxusnotationforGregorianChant(St.Gallonlines). Hetranscribedalargepartoftherepertory(especiallyresponsoriesandoffertories)for performancewithhisensemble,Gregoriana.See: http://www.gregoriana.nl / CesarinoRuini ProfessorofMusicalPalaeographyandHistoryofMedievalandRenaissanceMusicat the“FacoltàdiLettereeFilosofia”,UniversityofBologna.Hehasdoneresearchandhas publishedwidelyonmedievalmusictreatisesandthetraditionofliturgicalchantsinthe LatinChurch.Usinghisbackgroundinmusicology,historyandliterature,hehas investigatedtopicsrelatingtothesourcesoftheoreticalreflectiononmusicandthe heritageofGregorianchantsinrelationtoperformingpractice.Hehasemphasizedthe mutualinfluencebetweenoralandwrittentraditionasmanifestationsofawidercultural context.HehaseditedtheItaliansectionofthecatalogueofmedievalmusicmanuscripts forRISM.Currently,heisgeneraleditorofthe“Regoledellamusica”,aseriesof editionsofmedievalmusictreatiseswithItaliantranslationandcommentary,forthe publishinghouseSISMEL(SocietàInternazionaleperloStudiodelMedioevoLatino)– EdizionidelGalluzzo,Florence . C.RUINIBIBLIOGRAPHY ImanoscrittiliturgicidellaBibliotecamusicaleL.FeiningerpressoilCastellodel BuonconsigliodiTrento ,2voll,Trento,ProvinciaAutonomadiTrento–Serviziobeni librariearchivistici,19982002. FRANCHINOGAFFURIO, Theoricamusice .Testolatinoeitaliano.(withI.Illuminati), Firenze,SISMELEdizionidelGalluzzo,2005. “IlFrammentoMischiatidell’ArchiviodiStatodiReggionell’Emilia”,in Magnificat DominumMusicanostra ,ed.byP.Mioli,Bologna,Patron,2007,pp.151153 “Ilfuturodellamusicamedievale”,in IlSaggiatoremusicale ,XIII/2,2006,pp.349–354 “Suicriteridiedizioneditestiemusichedell’ArchivioPetrarcainmusica”,in: Petrarca eicompositorifiamminghi ,Convegnointernazionaleintornoalprogettoeuropeo“Gli archividigitaliperlasalvaguardiadelpatrimoniomusicaleeuropeo”,Roma, AcademiaBelgica,79settembre2006(publishedonline: http://www.unisi.it/tdtc/petrarca/pim.htm?ruini). “EsempidinotazionemensuraleneicodiciliturgicidellaBibliotecamusicaleL. FeiningerdiTrento”,in Ilcantofratto.L’altrogregoriano ,ed.byM.GozziandF. Luisi,Roma,Torred’Orfeo,pp.185202. “IlCannocchialeperlaFintaPazza diMaiolinoBisaccioni”,in «Orvaghiorfieri». Cennidipoeticaneilibrettiveneziani(circa16401740) ,ed.byA.ChiarelliandA. Pompilio,Bologna,CLUEB,2004,pp.279294. “FontisettecenteschedipolifoniasempliceaTrento:unmodelloditrasmissione”,in Un millenniodipolifonialiturgicatraoralitàescrittura ,ed.byG.CattinandF.A.Gallo, Bologna,IlMulino,2002,pp.187199 “Frammentidimosaiciedimanoscrittiperun’archeologiamusicale:ilcasodiTrento”, in Melodiedimenticate.Statodellericerchesuimanoscrittidicantoliturgico ,ed.by G.Filocamo,Firenze,Olschki,2002,pp.117