'Mcgeneration' ? an Examination of the Continuing Importance of Place

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'Mcgeneration' ? an Examination of the Continuing Importance of Place ‘McGeneration’ ? An Examination of the Continuing Importance of Place in Cultural Regeneration. Amanda Brown PhD 2011 ‘McGeneration’ ? An Examination of the Continuing Importance of Place in Cultural Regeneration. AMANDA BROWN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the School of Social Sciences March 2011 1 Abstract The regeneration of urban places is a major force in the landscape of previously declining industrial cities. The processes and policies of regeneration have received considerable research over the years, with a particular emphasis on quantitative indicators to capture large-scale effects. One major change has been the rising role of culture within regeneration. In this thesis, a closer, qualitative view is taken to investigating urban regeneration, to uncover a narrative of two particular and related concerns within cultural urban regeneration. On the one hand, the risks of homogenisation as standardised practices are transferred globally; on the other, the demand for distinctiveness, and for regenerated areas to demonstrate unique and appealing characteristics to mediate global processes, and attract inward investment of economic, social, and human capital. The thesis focuses on the iconic space of the waterfront, and studies three major regenerating cities in the United Kingdom, studying the dynamics of culture, homogenisation, and distinctiveness. From an initial synthesis of theories, a thematic framework is constructed. The thesis then captures the understanding of those themes as articulated by forty-seven elite actors who work within cultural regeneration in the three case study waterfronts, exposing the continuing impact of place in the face of homogenising forces. 2 Contents Title Page 1 Abstract 2 Contents 3 List of figures 8 List of tables 8 List of appendices 9 Glossary 9 Acknowledgements 11 Chapter 1: On the Waterfront: Re-establishing the specificity of place in cultural 12 regeneration 1. Introduction 12 1.1 Context 15 1.1.1 McGeneration and locality theory 15 1.1.2 The waterfront 16 1.1.3 Culture and the urban 18 1.2 Aims 21 1.3 Introduction to the chapters 22 1.4 Methods of investigation 24 1.5 Contribution to knowledge 26 1.6 Summary 27 Chapter 2: Locality, Place and the Urban 28 2. Introduction 28 2.1 Locality and place theory 29 2.1.1 The power of place 33 2.1.2 Sense of place 37 2.2 Globalisation 39 2.2.1 Culture 42 3 2.2.2 McGeneration 44 2.3 Policy transfer 47 2.4 Cultural regeneration 49 2.5 Urban design 52 2.6 Place consumption and place promotion 56 2.6.1 Marketing and branding 59 2.6.2 Place image and identity 61 2.7 Summary 63 Chapter 3: Cultural Regeneration: The Policy Context 64 3. Introduction 64 3.1 The urban problem 65 3.2 The history of urban regeneration policy 69 3.3 Cross-national policy transfer 74 3.3.1 American experience 77 3.3.2 European experience 83 3.4 Cultural renaissance 85 3.5 Regenerating waterfront places 91 3.5.1 Waterside development – the challenges 94 3.5.2 Remaking the urban waterfront 97 3.6 Summary 98 Chapter 4: Case Studies in Cultural Regeneration: a Methodological Approach 100 4. Introduction 100 4.1 Methodology 101 4.2 Interpretivism 103 4.2.1 Ontology and epistemology 104 4.2.2 Interpretivism research strategy 107 4 4.3 Case study approach 108 4.3.1 Selection of data sources 108 4.3.2 Choosing the case studies 110 4.4 Research design and analysis 111 4.4.1 Research design 111 4.4.2 Elite interviewing 112 4.4.3 Reliability in findings 116 4.5 Conducting the research 116 4.5.1 Data analysis 119 4.5.2 Secondary sources and scoping study 119 4.6 Summary 122 Chapter 5: Characterising the localities 123 5. Introduction 123 5.1 Liverpool 127 5.2 NewcastleGateshead 134 5.3 Glasgow 141 5.4 Cultural approaches 148 5.4.1 Branding 150 5.4.2 Events 151 5.4.3 Iconic buildings 153 5.4.4 Research 156 5.5 Summary 157 Chapter 6: An Examination of Homogeneity in Cultural Regeneration 159 6. Introduction to the homogenising (McGeneration) agenda 159 6.1 Creative Classes 162 6.1.1 Florida’s magic bullets 162 5 6.1.2 Competition for talent 164 6.1.3 Creative places for creative classes 166 6.2 Place as ‘commodity’ 168 6.2.1 Quick fixes 168 6.2.2 Places for tourism 169 6.2.3 Selling images of place 171 6.3 Consumption cities 172 6.3.1 Consuming a sense of place 173 6.3.2 McGeneration 175 6.3.3 Local consumption 176 6.4 Competitive cities 178 6.4.1 City positioning 178 6.4.2 Title race 182 6.4.3 Models to emulate 184 6.5 The new cultural spaces 188 6.5.1 Flagship places 189 6.5.2 Place-shaping 193 6.5.3 New waterfront places 196 6.6 Summary – culture, place, and homogenisation 200 Chapter 7: An Examination of Local Distinctiveness in Cultural Regeneration 202 7. Introduction to distinctiveness (distinct local practice) agenda 202 7.1 Local cultural identity 203 7.1.1 Local pride 203 7.1.2 Local character of place 206 7.1.3 Rooted experience 209 7.2 Distinct urban governance 213 7.2.1 Key local agents 214 6 7.2.2 Leadership and vision 216 7.2.3 Silo working 220 7.3 Path dependency 222 7.3.1 Place-shaping 223 7.3.2 Lesson learning 224 7.3.3 Cultural route to regeneration 226 7.4 Socio-economic characteristics 229 7.4.1 Previous changes 229 7.4.2 Culture and regeneration 231 7.4.3 Locally specific 234 7.5 Distinctive urban form 238 7.5.1 Waterfront uniqueness 238 7.5.2 Distinctive city edge 240 7.5.3 Best practice exemplar 242 7.6 Summary – homogenisation and distinctiveness 245 Chapter 8: McGeneration – the continuing importance of place? 247 8. Introduction 247 8.1 Policy context 254 8.2 Formulaic solutions 255 8.3 Locality and place 257 8.4 Contribution to knowledge 259 8.5 Methodological debate 260 8.6 Future considerations 264 8.7 Summary 267 References 268 Appendices 299 7 List of figures Figure 1: Map of the three case study locations and comparator exemplars 26 Figure 2: Key thinkers on space and place 31 Figure 3: Cross-national policy transfer of the global agenda to the local level 76 Figure 3.1: Map of the LDDC regeneration areas and staged withdrawal 81 Figure 3.2: The types and outcomes of twenty-first century cultural 96 regeneration on waterfronts Figure 5: Employment in the UK 125 Figure 5.1: Output, productivity and employment rates: change (1993-98) 126 Figure 5.2: The Albert Dock prior to water infill, c1980s 129 Figure 5.3: Liverpool waterfront 134 Figure 5.4: NewcastleGateshead Aerial Map, from a TWDC report, 1995 136 Figure 5.5: NewcastleGateshead Quayside 141 Figure 5.6: Glasgow Garden Festival site after clearance 1989 144 Figure 5.7: Glasgow waterfront 148 Figure 5.8: Cultural strategy types 150 Figure 5.9 Three case study brands 151 Figure 5.0.1: The Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre (SECC) Glasgow 154 and its waterfront Figure 5.0.2: Liverpool’s convention centre next to the Albert Dock 154 Figure 5.0.3: The Sage Gateshead seen from the Newcastle side of the River 155 Tyne Figure 8: Local and generic processes 249 List of tables Table 3: Developments in the 17-year lifecycle of the LDDC 82 Table 5: A snapshot profile of Liverpool 132 Table 5.1: A snapshot profile of NewcastleGateshead 140 8 Table 5.2: A snapshot profile of Glasgow 146 Table 8: Summary overview of the date for the five homogenising themes 252 Table 8.1: Summary overview of the data for the five distinctiveness themes 253 List of appendices Appendix A: Table of policy 298 Appendix B: List of interviewee organisations 303 Appendix C: List of semi-structured questions used at interview 305 Appendix D: Example interview transcript 307 Appendix E: Ethics 317 Appendix F: Scoping Study 318 Appendix G: Table of key points from the data 319 Glossary CCPR Centre for Cultural Policy Research CISR Cultural Investment and Strategic Impact Research DCMS Department for Culture Media and Sport DoE Department of the Environment EC European Commission ECoC European Capital (City) of Culture GEAR Glasgow Eastern Area Renewal IGF International Garden Festival LARC Liverpool Arts and Regeneration Campaign LDDC London Docklands Development Corporation LEP Local Enterprise Partnership 9 LSP Local Strategic Partnership MDC Merseyside Development Corporation NGI NewcastleGateshead Initiative ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister SDA Scottish Development Agency SECC Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre SRB Single Regeneration Budget TWDC Tyne and Wear Development Corporation UDAG Urban Development Grant Programme UDC Urban Development Corporation UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization URC Urban Regeneration Company 10 Acknowledgements As an undergraduate student in Newcastle in the early 1990s, I came across urban regeneration studies. My learning centred on economic geography and pre-twenty-first century approaches to developments tackling the urban problem. This, along with observing first-hand the major cultural developments on NewcastleGateshead Quayside, sparked my renewed interest in the field of regeneration. This ultimately led to the research reported in this thesis. I express my sincere appreciation to Northumbria University for the studentship I was awarded, which enabled me to undertake my doctoral research. I acknowledge the continued support the University gave to my development as a graduate researcher.
Recommended publications
  • Liverpool City Centre Strategic Investment Framework Strategic Priorities and Implementation Annexe
    Liverpool City Centre Strategic Investment Framework Strategic Priorities and Implementation Annexe The projects identified within the Liverpool City Centre Strategic Investment Framework (SIF) relate to either Major Transformational Projects, Strategic Initiatives or Infrastructure. The delivery and implementation of these is of upmost importance to ensure job creation and economic growth is achieved. The following table has been established in collaboration with key stakeholders to ensure that a number of objectives are achieved. The areas for consideration within the table include: • Ownership- Responsibility for lead delivery is allocated to ensure projects are driven forward by the appropriate authority. They will enlist the support of other key stakeholders when appropriate; • Timeframes-The timeframe for delivery is in many instances dependent on the delivery of other linked projects and the project’s ability to deliver jobs. Three timeframes have been identified: 1-3 years for near term projects; 4-8 years for medium term projects; and 9-15 years for long term projects. • Priority- Projects have been prioritised to ensure that jobs are delivered throughout the 15 year duration of the SIF, with an initial boost in the near term to stimulate the economy and ensure that the reduced public sector employment opportunities are replaced by private sector opportunities. High priority projects will therefore be planned, implemented and delivered in the earlier stages of the SIF where funding allows; • Potential funding source- Various options for funding have been identified and other opportunities are expected to become available over the lifetime of the SIF ; and • Outcomes- Each project has been identified and designed to achieve an outcome which will benefit the city’s development, ultimately leading to job creation and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts 08 Evaluation
    Impacts 08 Team Dr Beatriz García, Director Ruth Melville and Tamsin Cox, Programme Managers Ann Wade, Programme Coordinator Document Reference: Impacts 08 – Miah & Adi (2009) Liverpool 08 – Centre of the Online Universe Liverpool 08 Centre of the Online Universe The impact of the Liverpool ECoC within social media environments October 2009 Report by Prof Andy Miah and Ana Adi Faculty of Business & Creative Industries Impacts 08 is a joint programme of the University of Liverpool and Liverpool John Moores University Commissioned by Liverpool City Council Impacts 08 – Miah & Adi | Liverpool 08 – Centre of the Online Universe | 2009 Executive Summary Background to the study One of the major topics of debate in media research today is whether the Internet should be treated as the dominant form of information distribution, outstripping the impact of other media, such as television, radio or print. Opinions vary about this, but numerous examples of successful online media campaigns abound, such as Barack Obama‟s use of social media during the US Presidential campaign. Today, other governments are quick to utilise similar environments, and 10 Downing Street has accounts with both YouTube and Flickr, the popular websites used for video and photo sharing respectively. Additionally, marketing and communications departments in business, industry, the arts and the media are rapidly re-organising their strategies around the rise of digital convergence and in light of evidence that demonstrates the decline (or fragmentation) of mass media audiences. These circumstances are pertinent to the hosting of European Capital of Culture by Liverpool in 2008. In short, if we want to understand how audiences were engaged during 2008, we need to complement a range of surveys and reporting with analyses of online activity, which have the potential to reflect both broader media perspectives and the views of people on the street.
    [Show full text]
  • IOW Listing Brochure 22-3
    LIVERPOOL LITERARY FESTIVAL 23APRIL-19MAY2013 Liverpool City Council and Writing On The Wall would like to extend a big thank you to all our funders, sponsors and partners. We are especially grateful to our contributing organisations - the commercial businesses, cultural partners, educational establishments and community groups whose support has made this festival possible. Liverpool is a city renowned for its connection This will be a literary festival like no other. It is with words – whether they’re written, spoken not just about famous names but about first INTRODUCTIONor sung. The words which have been cultivated words, about writers, raconteurs and writers of in, or influenced by this city have had an impact the future. on many generations, touched people across the At the heart of this month-long festival will be globe, provoked debate and become synonymous Liverpool’s Central Library, which re-opens its with the Liverpool we know and love today. doors following more than two years of intricate The In Other Words festival pays homage to restoration. With historic treasures, state of-the- all things connected with words and how they art facilities and a new café to relax in there is inspire people. something for everyone. Working in partnership with Writing on the Wall, And to top it all off - the library’s re-opening on this brand new addition to this years calendar Friday 17 May coincides with LightNight, which will feature events ranging from author readings, sees venues across Liverpool open until late so book swaps and special storytelling events, to visitors can make the most of the cultural gems debates, poetry competitions and performances on their doorsteps.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool - Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document Public Consultation Summary
    Liverpool - Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document Public Consultation Summary Introduction The overarching aim of this SPD is to “provide a framework for protecting and enhancing the outstanding universal value of Liverpool –Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site, whilst encouraging investment and development which secures a healthy economy and supports regeneration. Liverpool has one of the longest and most recognisable waterfronts of any city in the United Kingdom and it has “the largest and most complete system of historic docks anywhere in the world.” Its remarkable history as an international seaport and its outstanding historic environment make it more than just another provincial English city. Indeed, the cultural heritage of Liverpool’s World Heritage Site is of outstanding universal value to the international community. Liverpool is witnessing a remarkable period of regeneration, as it seeks to grow, evolve and to find sustainable uses for its redundant historic docklands and the historic buildings that make such a positive contribution to its urban landscape. Liverpool City Council and its partners are committed to achieving a sensible balance between growth and conservation in this living working city. This SPD aims to provide guidance which will harmonise differing priorities for regeneration and conservation. It is a response to the changing demands of the port and the city, as Liverpool finds a new role in the 21st century, building upon its unique spirit of place. Enhancing Liverpool’s spirit of place is central to maintaining its distinctiveness, encouraging investment and development The Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been prepared to guide development, conservation and investment in the Liverpool - Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site (WHS) and its Buffer Zone with the aim of protecting the WHS’s Outstanding Universal Value whilst ensuring that it continues to play a leading role in the sustained regeneration of the City and the wider sub-region.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration of a City Centre Liverpool
    liverpool 1 regeneration of a city centre liverpool regeneration of a city centre Front cover; Liverpool One site boundary overlaid on the Designed by BDP city’s historic shoreline. (BDP). © 2009 BDP Produced by contents 2 Looking north towards the 3 Mersey Estuary – Liverpool One in the Heart of the City. introduction 4 1 a historical overview of liverpool 6 2 city regeneration 22 3 masterplan evolution 42 4 planning strategy 60 5 concept designs 70 6 the park 98 7 active streets 112 8 beyond 2008 128 epilogue 136 acknowledgments 138 introduction 4 by terry davenport It’s very rare to lead an undertaking that and fitted out in an eight year period plus, of undoubted impact that Liverpool One has had 5 transforms the fortunes of a great city. It’s course, all the enormous infrastructure works on the city, its visitors and proud inhabitants. even more unusual for that city to be your required for such an initiative. However, more importantly in these uncharted home town and place of birth. Because of The public support for the project times, the challenge to the industry is how my personal familiarity it has been a great was evident from the outset. So many to maintain the regeneration of our towns privilege for me to have led the Liverpool One disappointments over so many past years and cities under a quite different set of masterplan team, on behalf of Grosvenor, from meant that the public’s appetite for change was circumstances, circumstances which mean that the first day of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Regenerating Liverpool Pier Head Waterfront: the Role of Urban Design
    City, Culture and Architecture 2015; 1(1): 21-38 ISSN: 2148-1938 (Print) ISSN: 2149-8202 (Online) DOI: 10.15340/2148193811851 Research Article Regenerating Liverpool Pier Head Waterfront: the Role of Urban Design Mohamed Fageir1*, Nicole Porter2, Katharina Borsi3 1 2 3 University of Nottingham, UK Abstract: This paper investigates the processes by which the regeneration of the historical Pier Head waterfront in Liverpool took place during the first decade of the twenty-first century. The research focuses on three key regeneration projects at Pier Head Waterfront, namely the Fourth Grace, the New Museum of Liverpool and Mann Island Development. Each of these projects has undergone a relatively different process and, hence, faced different challenges and produced different outcomes. This study is based on a series of lengthy interviews with key stakeholders closely linked with the regeneration of the waterfront, a review of project related documents including urban design policy and guidance, a substantial review of relevant news articles that were written throughout the period of the recent transformation of the waterfront, and numerous site visits. By understanding the peculiarities of the global forces that drive large scale developments and the local context in which they occurred at Pier Head, several insights regarding the process of regeneration emerge. Findings foreground the role of urban design in urban waterfront regeneration, illustrating that despite the complexity of managing change, urban design has the capacity to mediate between the local and global forces and the needs/ desires of investors and local communities. Urban design is also imperative for challenging the negative impact of globalisation on the urban landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Dock: What Part in Liverpool's Continuing Renaissance?
    | 1 Albert Dock: What Part in Liverpool's Continuing Renaissance? Professor Michael Parkinson CBE and Dr Alex Lord ALBERT DOCK: WHAT PART IN LIVERPOOL’S CONTINUING RENAISSANCE? WELCOME | 3 Remember Albert Dock in 1979. Rotting, derelict, toxic, 600 acres written off. Look at it today. The site itself is transformed. The city is transformed. The lesson of the Dock from 1979 is that what matters is the person and the people in charge. Lord Michael Heseltine ALBERT DOCK: WHAT PART IN LIVERPOOL’S CONTINUING RENAISSANCE? FOREWORD | 5 Contents Chapter 1 . 7 What does this report do, how and why? I am very pleased to introduce the Heseltine Chapter 2. 10 Institute’s review of Albert Dock. How did we get to here? A nano history of Albert Dock As the authors say, the Dock is an iconic symbol of both Liverpool’s history and its renaissance – Chapter 3. 14 it is emblematic of the city’s social, economic How did the Dock renaissance begin? and cultural power. The work of the Merseyside Development Corporation 1981-1997 Speaking on behalf of the University of Liverpool I am determined that our talented staff and Chapter 4. 17 students will play a central role in supporting the Where does Albert Dock stand now? development of the city region. The University is an anchor institution in the North West, and our Chapter 5. 29 performance and reputation are intimately linked How do we build on Albert’s success across the wider to our location. Liverpool waterfront and city region? This report demonstrates the powerful contribution that the Heseltine Institute can make in shaping Appendix: Interviewees 34 future development in the city region.
    [Show full text]
  • A Liverpool Case Study of the Design Dimension of Planning and Development Processes
    Can a design-led approach to redevelopment deliver city centre regeneration? A Liverpool case study of the design dimension of planning and development processes A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Town Planning in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 Victoria Lawson School of Environment, Education and Development 0 Contents Contents 1 List of Figures 7 List of Tables 9 Abstract 10 Declaration of Authority 11 Copyright Statement 11 Dedication 12 About the Author 12 Chapter One: Introduction 13 1.1 Introduction 13 1.2 Funding urban-scale development 15 1.3 The rise of the outdoor mall 16 1.4 Introducing the case study 18 1.5 The rationale 19 1.7 Justification 20 1.8 The structure of the thesis 22 Chapter Two: Reviewing the literature and framing the study 24 2.1 Statement of purpose 24 2.2 The development of capitalism and the growth of cities 24 2.3 Urbanised capitalism and aesthetics 25 2.4 Pursuing design quality in the built environment 27 2.4.1 Defining ‘design led’ in the production of space 30 2.4.2 The public’s influence on design 31 2.5 Towards a theoretical framework 33 2.5.1 Critical realism 33 2.5.2 The selection of key theories 35 2.6 Postpolitics 36 2.6.1 Masterplanning 39 2.6.2 Stakeholder practices 41 2.6.3 The ‘design meta-narrative’ 41 2.6.4 Public-private partnerships 41 2.6.5 Shadow consultations 42 2.6.6 Delegated powers 42 2.6.7 The press 42 2.7 Democratic urban settings 43 1 2.7.1 Privatisation of space 43 2.7.2 Phantom firms 43 2.8 The city makers 44 2.9 Semiotics
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Economic Impacts of Liverpool European Capital of Culture
    Impacts 08 Team Dr Beatriz García, Director Ruth Melville, Programme Manager Pete Campbell, Programme Assistant Document Reference: Impacts 08 (2007) Baseline Findings 2006/07 Impacts 08 Baseline Findings 2006/07 March 2007 Impacts 08 is a joint programme of the University of Liverpool and Liverpool John Moores University Commissioned by Liverpool City Council Impacts 08 | Baseline Findings 2006/07 | Table of contents The Impacts 08 Team Dr Beatriz García, Director Ruth Melville, Senior Research Fellow Pete Campbell, Programme Assistant Document reference: Impacts 08 (March 2007) Baseline Report 2006/07 [available online: www.impacts08.net] 1 Impacts 08 - The Liverpool Model, European Capital of Culture Research Programme www.impacts08.net Impacts 08 | Baseline Findings 2006/07 | Table of contents Table of Contents Index: 1. Introduction and Report Overview .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Impacts 08 Brief: Core aims, objectives and outline for the research ..................................................... 5 1.2. The Impacts 08 Proposal: A New Model for Culture-led Regeneration Research ................................... 6 1.3. The Research Framework ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. Reporting and dissemination................................................................................................................... 9 1.5. Research progress .................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Creating an Impact: Liverpool's Experience As European Capital Of
    Impacts 08: The Liverpool Model www.impacts08.net European Capital of Culture Research Programme University of Liverpool Report by: Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK Beatriz Garcia Email: [email protected] IMPACTS Ruth Melville European Capital of Culture Research Programme Tamsin Cox www.impacts08.net Creating an impact: Cover photography by Beatriz Garcia of The Liverpool Cityscape, 2008 ©Ben Johnson 2010. All Rights Reserved DACS. Liverpool’s experience as European Capital of Culture The Liverpool Cityscape will be on display in the Museum of Liverpool which opens in 2011. Impacts 08: The Liverpool Model www.impacts08.net European Capital of Culture Research Programme University of Liverpool Report by: Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK Beatriz Garcia Email: [email protected] IMPACTS Ruth Melville European Capital of Culture Research Programme Tamsin Cox www.impacts08.net Creating an impact: Cover photography by Beatriz Garcia of The Liverpool Cityscape, 2008 ©Ben Johnson 2010. All Rights Reserved DACS. Liverpool’s experience as European Capital of Culture The Liverpool Cityscape will be on display in the Museum of Liverpool which opens in 2011. 41,000+ activities including: – 276 highlight events – 21,000 performance and exhibition days The Liverpool ECoC programme had a total – 20,000 workshops and training sessions – 7,000+ activities Resulting in: – An audience of 9.8 million income of £130 million over six years, the highest – A total audience of 18 million – 80%+ of audiences rated the – 1,000 volunteers giving 7,000 days events ‘good’
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4Mb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/80890 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications ‘Our place': class, the theatre audience and the Royal Court Liverpool Maria Barrett Submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Centre for Cultural Policy Studies and Theatre Studies June 2016 Maria Barrett Page 3 PhD Thesis: June 2016 Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... 10 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... 11 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 1 Prologue: an introduction to the thesis ................................................................ 14 Class ................................................................................................................................... 21 What is class? ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Thrive Programme North Liverpool Consultation Research Report
    Liverpool Thrive programme North Liverpool consultation research report April 2009 Liverpool Thrive programme North Liverpool consultation research report Liverpool Thrive programme North Liverpool consultation research report Contents Page Executive Summary 4 1.1 Introduction and purpose of the research and methodology 7 1.2 LARC – Liverpool Arts Regeneration Consortium 8 1.3 LARC’s focus on North Liverpool 9 1.4 Themes 9 2 Cultural Activity in North Liverpool 10 3 Key issues 12 4 Conclusions and Next steps 14 Appendix 1 – Consultation List 16 Appendix 2 – Table showing partnerships between LARC organisations and community organisations in North Liverpool as at December 2008 17 Appendix 3 – Descriptions of the LARC partners and other cultural organisations working in North Liverpool 19 Appendix 4 – Cultural activity delivered by organisations based in North Liverpool 28 This report was written by Adeyinka Olushonde, Partnerships and Development Co-ordinator for Liverpool Arts Regeneration Consortium, and Belinda Kidd, LARC Thrive Programme Director, in Spring 2009, based on research undertaken by Adeyinka Olushonde between September 2008 and February 2009. Sue Harrison, Project Facilitator for Thrive, provided invaluable editorial support. To contact the Liverpool Thrive team, please email [email protected] Liverpool Thrive is funded by Arts Council England Liverpool Thrive programme North Liverpool consultation research report Liverpool Thrive programme North Liverpool consultation research report Executive summary Executive summary LARC (Liverpool Arts Regeneration Consortium) wants to To address these issues, Liverpool City Council drew up the and the Bluecoat has an extensive outreach programme in North Liverpool Cultural Committee is a valuable network, ensure that culture is integral to the regeneration process in North Liverpool Economic Development Plan to ensure that the neighbouring area of North East Liverpool, Alt Valley.
    [Show full text]