DOCSLIB.ORG

Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Document Title Specification of Compiler Abstraction Document Owner AUTOSAR Document Responsibility AUTOSAR Document Identification No 051 Document Classification Standard Document Status Final Part of AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Document Change History Release Changed by Change Description 4.2.2 AUTOSAR Cleanup the requirements traceability Release Clarify the list of compiler symbols Management 4.2.1 AUTOSAR The compiler symbol definitions are not allowed Release to contain any value behind the symbol Management Rework the document structure in order to follow TMPS_SRS_SWS and replace hardcoded diagrams with artifacts Remove all MISRA/ C/ C++ related statements and references Correct the unresolved references that point in SRS_BSWGeneral 4.1.2 AUTOSAR Editorial changes Release Removed chapter(s) on change documentation Management 4.1.1 AUTOSAR Added abstraction macro CONSTP2FUNC for a Administration constant pointer to a function Improved consistency to Memory Mapping (several MemMap.h files) Reworked Configuration Specification 4.0.3 AUTOSAR Added macros ‚FUNC_P2CONST‘ and Administration ‘FUNC_P2VAR’ Added pointer class ‘REGSPACE’ (for register access) Updated the compiler symbols list 3.1.5 AUTOSAR Put more emphasize on SwComponentType’s Administration name in SWS_COMPILER_00054, COMPILER044 Corrected compiler used in the example (chapter 7.1.5) Corrected include structure in the example (chapter 7.1.5) 1 of 50 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Document Change History Release Changed by Change Description 3.1.4 AUTOSAR Compiler Abstraction has been extended to be Administration suitable for Software Components "STATIC" declaration keyword has been removed The declaration keyword "LOCAL_INLINE" has been added for implementation of "static inline"- functions Legal disclaimer revised 3.1.1 AUTOSAR Legal disclaimer revised Administration 3.0.1 AUTOSAR Keyword "_STATIC_" has been renamed to Administration "STATIC" Keyword "_INLINE_" has been renamed to "INLINE" Keyword "TYPEDEF" has been added as empty memory qualifier for use in type definitions Document meta information extended Small layout adaptations made 2.1.15 AUTOSAR Add: COMPILER058 Administration Add: COMPILER057 Change: SWS_COMPILER_00040 Legal disclaimer revised Release Notes added “Advice for users” revised “Revision Information” added 2.0 AUTOSAR Initial Release Administration 2 of 50 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Disclaimer This specification and the material contained in it, as released by AUTOSAR, is for the purpose of information only. AUTOSAR and the companies that have contributed to it shall not be liable for any use of the specification. The material contained in this specification is protected by copyright and other types of Intellectual Property Rights. The commercial exploitation of the material contained in this specification requires a license to such Intellectual Property Rights. This specification may be utilized or reproduced without any modification, in any form or by any means, for informational purposes only. For any other purpose, no part of the specification may be utilized or reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher. The AUTOSAR specifications have been developed for automotive applications only. They have neither been developed, nor tested for non-automotive applications. The word AUTOSAR and the AUTOSAR logo are registered trademarks. Advice for users AUTOSAR specifications may contain exemplary items (exemplary reference models, "use cases", and/or references to exemplary technical solutions, devices, processes or software). Any such exemplary items are contained in the specifications for illustration purposes only, and they themselves are not part of the AUTOSAR Standard. Neither their presence in such specifications, nor any later documentation of AUTOSAR conformance of products actually implementing such exemplary items, imply that intellectual property rights covering such exemplary items are licensed under the same rules as applicable to the AUTOSAR Standard. 3 of 50 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and functional overview ................................................................... 6 2 Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................... 7 3 Related documentation........................................................................................ 8 3.1 Input documents ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 Related specification .................................................................................... 9 4 Constraints and assumptions ............................................................................ 10 4.1 Limitations .................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Applicability to car domains ........................................................................ 10 4.3 Applicability to safety related environments ............................................... 10 5 Dependencies to other modules ........................................................................ 11 5.1 File structure .............................................................................................. 11 6 Requirements traceability .................................................................................. 12 7 Functional specification ..................................................................................... 18 7.1 General behavior ........................................................................................ 18 7.1.1 List of Compiler symbols ..................................................................... 18 7.1.2 Requirements on implementations using compiler abstraction ........... 18 7.1.3 Contents of Compiler.h ....................................................................... 23 7.1.4 Contents of Compiler_Cfg.h ................................................................ 24 7.1.5 Comprehensive example .................................................................... 25 7.1.6 Proposed process ............................................................................... 27 7.2 Development Errors ................................................................................... 28 7.3 Production Errors ....................................................................................... 28 7.4 Extended Production Errors ....................................................................... 28 7.5 Error detection ............................................................................................ 28 7.6 Error notification ......................................................................................... 28 7.7 Version check ............................................................................................. 28 7.8 Support for Debugging ............................................................................... 28 8 API specification ................................................................................................ 29 8.1 Imported types............................................................................................ 29 8.2 Macro definitions ........................................................................................ 29 8.2.1 General definitions .............................................................................. 29 8.2.1.1 Memory class AUTOMATIC ............................................................ 29 8.2.1.2 Memory class TYPEDEF ................................................................. 29 8.2.1.3 NULL_PTR ...................................................................................... 30 8.2.1.4 INLINE ............................................................................................. 30 8.2.1.5 LOCAL_INLINE ............................................................................... 30 8.2.2 Function definitions ............................................................................. 30 8.2.2.1 FUNC .............................................................................................. 32 8.2.2.2 FUNC_P2CONST ............................................................................ 33 8.2.2.3 FUNC_P2VAR ................................................................................. 34 8.2.3 Pointer definitions ................................................................................ 34 4 of 50 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction AUTOSAR Release 4.2.2 8.2.3.1 P2VAR ............................................................................................. 39 8.2.3.2 P2CONST ........................................................................................ 40 8.2.3.3 CONSTP2VAR ................................................................................ 41 8.2.3.4 CONSTP2CONST ........................................................................... 41 8.2.3.5 P2FUNC .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AMD Athlon™ Processor X86 Code Optimization Guide
    AMD AthlonTM Processor x86 Code Optimization Guide © 2000 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. The contents of this document are provided in connection with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) products. AMD makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this publication and reserves the right to make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time without notice. No license, whether express, implied, arising by estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property rights is granted by this publication. Except as set forth in AMD’s Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale, AMD assumes no liability whatsoever, and disclaims any express or implied warranty, relating to its products including, but not limited to, the implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or infringement of any intellectual property right. AMD’s products are not designed, intended, authorized or warranted for use as components in systems intended for surgical implant into the body, or in other applications intended to support or sustain life, or in any other applica- tion in which the failure of AMD’s product could create a situation where per- sonal injury, death, or severe property or environmental damage may occur. AMD reserves the right to discontinue or make changes to its products at any time without notice. Trademarks AMD, the AMD logo, AMD Athlon, K6, 3DNow!, and combinations thereof, AMD-751, K86, and Super7 are trademarks, and AMD-K6 is a registered trademark of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Microsoft, Windows, and Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Strict Protection for Virtual Function Calls in COTS C++ Binaries
    vfGuard: Strict Protection for Virtual Function Calls in COTS C++ Binaries Aravind Prakash Xunchao Hu Heng Yin Department of EECS Department of EECS Department of EECS Syracuse University Syracuse University Syracuse University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) is an important se- these binary-only solutions are unfortunately coarse-grained curity property that needs to be enforced to prevent control- and permissive. flow hijacking attacks. Recent attacks have demonstrated that existing CFI protections for COTS binaries are too permissive, While coarse-grained CFI solutions have significantly re- and vulnerable to sophisticated code reusing attacks. Accounting duced the attack surface, recent efforts by Goktas¸¨ et al. [9] for control flow restrictions imposed at higher levels of semantics and Carlini [10] have demonstrated that coarse-grained CFI is key to increasing CFI precision. In this paper, we aim to provide solutions are too permissive, and can be bypassed by reusing more stringent protection for virtual function calls in COTS large gadgets whose starting addresses are allowed by these C++ binaries by recovering C++ level semantics. To achieve this solutions. The primary reason for such permissiveness is the goal, we recover C++ semantics, including VTables and virtual lack of higher level program semantics that introduce certain callsites. With the extracted C++ semantics, we construct a sound mandates on the control flow. For example, given a class CFI policy and further improve the policy precision by devising two filters, namely “Nested Call Filter” and “Calling Convention inheritance, target of a virtual function dispatch in C++ must Filter”.
    [Show full text]
  • A PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER INTERFACE for CAMAC F by Robert W
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7148 A PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER INTERFACE FOR CAMAC f by Robert W. Bercaw, Theodore E. Fessler, \ and Jeffrey M. Arnold Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • MARCH 1973 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D-7148 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date March 1973 A PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER INTERFACE FOR CAMAC 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert W. Bercaw, Theodore E. Fessler, and Jeffrey M. Arnold E-6957 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 503-10 Lewis Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland, Ohio 44135 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Note National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, B.C. 20546 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract An interface has been developed for CAMAC instrumentation systems that implements data transfers controlled either by the computer CPU or by an autonomous (data-channel) processor in the interface unit. The data channel processor executes programs stored in the computer memory. These programs consist of standard CAMAC module commands plus special control characters and commands for the processor itself. The interface was built for the PDP-15 computer, which has an 18-bit word structure, but both 18- and 24-bit data transfers can be made. A software system has been written that exploits the many features of the processor. 17. Key Words (Suggested by Author(s)) 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Note Saving Data During a Power Failure Using the Dataflash® E-Series Family
    Saving Data During a Power Failure Using the DataFlash® E-Series Family Application Note Saving Data During a Power Failure Using the DataFlash® E-Series Family Abstract This application note is intended to provide readers with information on how to save critical data to the Flash memory of DataFlash E-Series devices in the event of a power failure. The power failure is simulated by removing power to the devices. This document does not discuss how the power failure is detected, how the microcontroller may respond to the failure, or how the power rail is controlled for both the DataFlash device and the microcontroller. Product Highlights • Single 3V Read/Write Operation (1.65V - 3.6V Supply Range) • SPI Mode 0 and Mode 3 Compatible • Fast Read Access Times: 85 MHz Maximum Clock Frequency • Individual Hardware and Software Sector Protection • Security: 128-byte Register • JEDEC Standard Manufacturer and Device ID Read • Endurance: 100,000 Program/Erase Cycles per Page Minimum • Data Retention: 20 Years • Packaging Options: SOIC, DFN, WLCSP, Die/Wafer • Green (Pb/Halide-free) Packaging Options Application Note 114 11-Dec-2020 AN114 1 of 13 © 2020 Dialog Semiconductor Saving Data During a Power Failure Using the DataFlash® E-Series Family Revision History Revision Date Description A0 11-Dec-2020 Initial Release Application Note 114 11-Dec-2020 AN114 2 of 13 © 2020 Dialog Semiconductor Saving Data During a Power Failure Using the DataFlash® E-Series Family 1 Introduction The DataFlash E-series family of Flash memory devices are often used in applications such as server configuration, data logging, event counters and failure/error/status loggers.
    [Show full text]
  • 14-/12-Bit, 250MSPS, Ultralow-Power ADC with Analog Buffers Check for Samples: ADS41B29, ADS41B49
    ADS41B29 ADS41B49 www.ti.com SBAS486E – NOVEMBER 2009–REVISED JULY 2012 14-/12-Bit, 250MSPS, Ultralow-Power ADC with Analog Buffers Check for Samples: ADS41B29, ADS41B49 1FEATURES DESCRIPTION The ADS41B29/B49 are members of the ultralow- 23• ADS41B49: 14-Bit, 250MSPS ADS41B29: 12-Bit, 250MSPS power ADS4xxx analog-to-digital converter (ADC) family, featuring integrated analog input buffers. • Integrated High-Impedance These devices use innovative design techniques to Analog Input Buffer: achieve high dynamic performance, while consuming – Input Capacitance: 2pF extremely low power. The analog input pins have – 200MHz Input Resistance: 3kΩ buffers, with benefits of constant performance and input impedance across a wide frequency range. The • Maximum Sample Rate: 250MSPS devices are well-suited for multi-carrier, wide • Ultralow Power: bandwidth communications applications such as PA – 1.8V Analog Power: 180mW linearization. – 3.3V Buffer Power: 96mW The ADS41B49/29 have features such as digital gain – I/O Power: 135mW (DDR LVDS) and offset correction. The gain option can be used to improve SFDR performance at lower full-scale input • High Dynamic Performance: ranges, especially at high input frequencies. The – SNR: 69dBFS at 170MHz integrated dc offset correction loop can be used to – SFDR: 82.5dBc at 170MHz estimate and cancel the ADC offset. At lower sampling rates, the ADC automatically operates at • Output Interface: scaled-down power with no loss in performance. – Double Data Rate (DDR) LVDS with Programmable Swing and Strength: The devices support both double data rate (DDR) low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS) and parallel – Standard Swing: 350mV CMOS digital output interfaces. The low data rate of – Low Swing: 200mV the DDR LVDS interface (maximum 500MBPS) – Default Strength: 100Ω Termination makes it possible to use low-cost field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based receivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricore Architecture Manual for a Detailed Discussion of Instruction Set Encoding and Semantics
    User’s Manual, v2.3, Feb. 2007 TriCore 32-bit Unified Processor Core Embedded Applications Binary Interface (EABI) Microcontrollers Edition 2007-02 Published by Infineon Technologies AG 81726 München, Germany © Infineon Technologies AG 2007. All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer The information given in this document shall in no event be regarded as a guarantee of conditions or characteristics (“Beschaffenheitsgarantie”). With respect to any examples or hints given herein, any typical values stated herein and/or any information regarding the application of the device, Infineon Technologies hereby disclaims any and all warranties and liabilities of any kind, including without limitation warranties of non- infringement of intellectual property rights of any third party. Information For further information on technology, delivery terms and conditions and prices please contact your nearest Infineon Technologies Office (www.infineon.com). Warnings Due to technical requirements components may contain dangerous substances. For information on the types in question please contact your nearest Infineon Technologies Office. Infineon Technologies Components may only be used in life-support devices or systems with the express written approval of Infineon Technologies, if a failure of such components can reasonably be expected to cause the failure of that life-support device or system, or to affect the safety or effectiveness of that device or system. Life support devices or systems are intended to be implanted in the human body, or to support and/or maintain and sustain and/or protect human life. If they fail, it is reasonable to assume that the health of the user or other persons may be endangered. User’s Manual, v2.3, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Operating System (RTOS)
    Real-Time Operating System ELC 4438 – Spring 2016 Liang Dong Baylor University RTOS – Basic Kernel Services Task Management • Scheduling is the method by which threads, processes or data flows are given access to system resources (e.g. processor time, communication bandwidth). • The need for a scheduling algorithm arises from the requirement for most modern systems to perform multitasking (executing more than one process at a time) and multiplexing (transmit multiple data streams simultaneously across a single physical channel). Task Management • Polled loops; Synchronized polled loops • Cyclic Executives (round-robin) • State-driven and co-routines • Interrupt-driven systems – Interrupt service routines – Context switching void main(void) { init(); Interrupt-driven while(true); } Systems void int1(void) { save(context); task1(); restore(context); } void int2(void) { save(context); task2(); restore(context); } Task scheduling • Most RTOSs do their scheduling of tasks using a scheme called "priority-based preemptive scheduling." • Each task in a software application must be assigned a priority, with higher priority values representing the need for quicker responsiveness. • Very quick responsiveness is made possible by the "preemptive" nature of the task scheduling. "Preemptive" means that the scheduler is allowed to stop any task at any point in its execution, if it determines that another task needs to run immediately. Hybrid Systems • A hybrid system is a combination of round- robin and preemptive-priority systems. – Tasks of higher priority can preempt those of lower priority. – If two or more tasks of the same priority are ready to run simultaneously, they run in round-robin fashion. Thread Scheduling ThreadPriority.Highest ThreadPriority.AboveNormal A B ThreadPriority.Normal C ThreadPriority.BelowNormal D E F ThreadPriority.Lowest Default priority is Normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallelization Hardware Architecture Type to Enter Text
    Parallelization Hardware architecture Type to enter text Delft University of Technology Challenge the future Contents • Introduction • Classification of systems • Topology • Clusters and Grid • Fun Hardware 2 hybrid parallel vector superscalar scalar 3 Why Parallel Computing Primary reasons: • Save time • Solve larger problems • Provide concurrency (do multiple things at the same time) Classification of HPC hardware • Architecture • Memory organization 5 1st Classification: Architecture • There are several different methods used to classify computers • No single taxonomy fits all designs • Flynn's taxonomy uses the relationship of program instructions to program data • SISD - Single Instruction, Single Data Stream • SIMD - Single Instruction, Multiple Data Stream • MISD - Multiple Instruction, Single Data Stream • MIMD - Multiple Instruction, Multiple Data Stream 6 Flynn’s Taxonomy • SISD: single instruction and single data stream: uniprocessor • SIMD: vector architectures: lower flexibility • MISD: no commercial multiprocessor: imagine data going through a pipeline of execution engines • MIMD: most multiprocessors today: easy to construct with off-the-shelf computers, most flexibility 7 SISD • One instruction stream • One data stream • One instruction issued on each clock cycle • One instruction executed on single element(s) of data (scalar) at a time • Traditional ‘von Neumann’ architecture (remember from introduction) 8 SIMD • Also von Neumann architectures but more powerful instructions • Each instruction may operate on more than one data element • Usually intermediate host executes program logic and broadcasts instructions to other processors • Synchronous (lockstep) • Rating how fast these machines can issue instructions is not a good measure of their performance • Two major types: • Vector SIMD • Parallel SIMD 9 Vector SIMD • Single instruction results in multiple operands being updated • Scalar processing operates on single data elements.
    [Show full text]
  • IAR C/C++ Compiler Reference Guide for V850
    IAR Embedded Workbench® IAR C/C++ Compiler Reference Guide for the Renesas V850 Microcontroller Family CV850-9 COPYRIGHT NOTICE © 1998–2013 IAR Systems AB. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written consent of IAR Systems AB. The software described in this document is furnished under a license and may only be used or copied in accordance with the terms of such a license. DISCLAIMER The information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on any part of IAR Systems. While the information contained herein is assumed to be accurate, IAR Systems assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. In no event shall IAR Systems, its employees, its contractors, or the authors of this document be liable for special, direct, indirect, or consequential damage, losses, costs, charges, claims, demands, claim for lost profits, fees, or expenses of any nature or kind. TRADEMARKS IAR Systems, IAR Embedded Workbench, C-SPY, visualSTATE, The Code to Success, IAR KickStart Kit, I-jet, I-scope, IAR and the logotype of IAR Systems are trademarks or registered trademarks owned by IAR Systems AB. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Renesas is a registered trademark of Renesas Electronics Corporation. V850 is a trademark of Renesas Electronics Corporation. Adobe and Acrobat Reader are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated. All other product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. EDITION NOTICE Ninth edition: May 2013 Part number: CV850-9 This guide applies to version 4.x of IAR Embedded Workbench® for the Renesas V850 microcontroller family.
    [Show full text]
  • The 8255A Is Generally Seen As 8-Bit Bidirectional Data Buffer, Which Is
    PROGRAMMABLE PERIPHERAL INTERFACE 8255 The 8255A is generally seen as 8-bit bidirectional data buffer, which is specially designed to transfer the data with the execution of input output instructions requested by the CPU. It has the ability to use with almost any microprocessor. It consists of three 8-bit bidirectional I/O ports (24I/O lines) which can be configured with their different functional characteristics, each possessing unique features to upgrade the flexibility of 8255. Ports of 8255A 8255A consists of three ports, i.e., PORT A, PORT B, and PORT C. Port A contains one 8-bit output latch/buffer and one 8-bit input buffer possessing both pull- up and pull-down devices present in Port A. Port B is similar to PORT A. Port C can be split into two parts, i.e. PORT C lower (PC0-PC3) and PORT C upper (PC7- PC4) with the help of control word. These three ports are further classified into two groups, i.e. Group A includes PORT A and upper PORT C. Group B includes PORT B and lower PORT C. These two groups can be programmed in three different modes, i.e. the first mode is named as mode 0, the second mode is named as Mode 1 and the third mode is named as Mode 2. Data Bus Buffer : It is a tri-state 8-bit bidirectional data buffer, which helps in interfacing the microprocessor to the system data bus. Data is transmitted or received by the buffer with the input output instructions given by the CPU.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 21: Calling Conventions Menu Calling Convention Calling Convention X86 C Calling Convention
    CS216: Program and Data Representation University of Virginia Computer Science Spring 2006 David Evans Menu Lecture 21: Calling Conventions • x86 C Calling Convention • Java Byte Code Wizards http://www.cs.virginia.edu/cs216 UVa CS216 Spring 2006 - Lecture 21: Calling Conventions 2 Calling Convention Calling Convention • Rules for how the caller and the Caller Callee callee make subroutine calls • Where to put • Where to find • Caller needs to know: params params • What registers can I • What registers – How to pass parameters assume are same must I not bash – What registers might be bashed by • Where to find result • Where to put result called function • State of stack • State of stack – What is state of stack after return – Where to get result UVa CS216 Spring 2006 - Lecture 21: Calling Conventions 3 UVa CS216 Spring 2006 - Lecture 21: Calling Conventions 4 Calling Convention: x86 C Calling Convention Easiest for Caller Caller Callee Caller Callee • Where to put • Where to find • Params on stack in • Find params on stack params params reverse order in reverse order • What registers can I • What registers • Can assume EBX, • Must not bash EBX, assume are same must I not bash EDI and ESI are EDI or ESI – All of them – None of them same • Put result in EAX • Where to find result • Where to put result • Find result in EAX • Stack rules next • State of stack • State of stack • Stack rules next Need to save and Need to save and restore restore EBX, EDI (EAX), ECX, EDX and ESI UVa CS216 Spring 2006 - Lecture 21: Calling Conventions 5 UVa CS216
    [Show full text]
  • Specification of Compiler Abstraction
    Specification of Compiler Abstraction V2.2.1 R3.2 Rev 3 Document Title Specification of Compiler Abstraction Document Owner AUTOSAR Document Responsibility AUTOSAR Document Identification No 051 Document Classification Standard Document Version 2.2.1 Document Status Final Part of Release 3.2 Revision 3 Document Change History Date Version Changed by Change Description 28.02.2014 2.2.1 AUTOSAR Editorial changes Release Management 17.05.2012 2.2.0 AUTOSAR Added pointer class ‘REGSPACE’ (for Administration register access) 07.04.2011 2.1.0 AUTOSAR Addtition of the macros Administration FUNC_P2CONST(COMPILER061, COMPILER062) and FUNC_P2VAR(COMPILER063, COMPILER064) (see bug #43874) Rework of COMPILER058 to be compatible to the added macros 23.06.2008 2.0.1 AUTOSAR Legal disclaimer revised Administration 27.11.2007 2.0.0 AUTOSAR Keyword "_STATIC_" has been renamed Administration to "STATIC" Keyword "_INLINE_" has been renamed to "INLINE" Keyword "TYPEDEF" has been added as empty memory qualifier for use in type definitions Document meta information extended Small layout adaptations made 31.01.2007 1.1.0 AUTOSAR Add: COMPILER058 Administration Add: COMPILER057 Change: COMPILER040 Legal disclaimer revised Release Notes added “Advice for users” revised “Revision Information” added 1 of 44 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction V2.2.1 R3.2 Rev 3 Document Change History Date Version Changed by Change Description 27.04.2006 1.0.0 AUTOSAR Initial Release Administration 2 of 44 Document ID 051: AUTOSAR_SWS_CompilerAbstraction - AUTOSAR confidential - Specification of Compiler Abstraction V2.2.1 R3.2 Rev 3 Disclaimer This specification and the material contained in it, as released by AUTOSAR is for the purpose of information only.
    [Show full text]