Lectures on the Calabi-Yau Landscape Arxiv:2001.01212V2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lectures on the Calabi-Yau Landscape Arxiv:2001.01212V2 Lectures on the Calabi-Yau Landscape Jiakang Bao1;2,∗ Yang-Hui He1;3;4,y Edward Hirst1;2,z Stephen Pietromonaco5x 1Department of Mathematics, City, University of London, EC1V 0HB, UK 2Department of Physics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK 3Merton College, University of Oxford, OX14JD, UK 4School of Physics, NanKai University, Tianjin, 300071, P.R. China 5Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, V6T 1Z2, Canada Abstract In these lecture notes, we survey the landscape of Calabi-Yau threefolds, and the use of machine learning to explore it. We begin with the compact portion of the landscape, focusing in particular on complete intersection Calabi-Yau varieties (CICYs) and elliptic fibrations. Then we examine non-compact Calabi-Yau manifolds which are manifest in Type II superstring theories. They arise as representation varieties of quivers, used to describe gauge theories in the bulk familiar four dimensions. Finally, given the huge amount of Calabi-Yau data, whether and how machine learning can be applied to algebraic geometry and string landscape is also discussed. These notes are directed to the beginning graduate student interested in mathematics and in physics, and are based on lectures given by the 2nd author at the 2019 PIMS Summer School on Algebraic Geometry in High-Energy Physics at the University of Saskatchewan. arXiv:2001.01212v2 [hep-th] 4 Feb 2020 ∗jiakang:bao18@imperial:ac:uk yhey@maths:ox:ac:uk zEdward:Hirst@city:ac:uk xspietro@math:ubc:ca 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction4 I Compact Calabi-Yau Landscape5 2 Calabi-Yau Geometry in Math and Physics5 2.1 Topological Data . .7 2.2 String Compactifications . .9 3 C.I.C.Y. 9 3.1 Cyclic Calabi-Yau Threefolds . .9 3.2 CICY Calabi-Yau Threefolds . 11 4 Elliptically Fibered Calabi-Yau Threefolds 13 5 Additional Regions of the Compact Landscape 15 II Non-compact Calabi-Yau Landscape 16 6 String Theory Structures 16 6.1 D-branes . 16 6.2 Quivers . 17 3 6.3 An Orbifold Example: C =Z3 .......................... 18 6.4 McKay Correspondence . 19 7 Algebraic Geometry Viewpoint 20 7.1 Brane Tilings . 20 7.2 Dessin d'Enfants . 22 8 Non-compact Calabi-Yau Summary 24 III Machine-Learning the Landscape 26 9 Performance Measures: Hypersurfaces in W P4 26 10 Learning CICYs 28 10.1 Distinguishing Elliptic Fibrations . 31 11 A Digression: Group Theory 33 11.1 Learning Cayley Tables . 33 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS 11.2 Learning Finite Simple Groups . 33 12 Summary and Outlook 34 A Some Complex Geometry 35 A.1 K¨ahlerManifolds . 36 A.2 Chern Classes . 36 B Toric Varieties 37 C Introduction to Machine Learning 39 C.1 Text recognition . 39 C.2 Neural Networks . 41 C.3 Support Vector Machines . 43 C.4 Decision Trees . 46 C.5 Types of Machine Learning . 48 References 49 3 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction Superstring theories demand our spacetime dimension to be 10, which means we should reduce them to an effectively 4-dimensional theory. The standard solution of string com- pactification, as a generalization of Kaluza-Klein compactification, renders the extra six dimensions Calabi-Yau (CY). Thus, the study of Calabi-Yau and algebraic geometry has entered the field of theoretical physics. In order to avoid an excess of symmetries in our observed 4-dimensional universe, isome- tries in our geometry, which leads to extra graviphotons, is not allowed [1]. This leaves us the only option of manifolds of complex dimension 3, which requires K¨ahlerstructure and vanishing first Chern classes (c1 = 0). As will be explained in x2.2, we also want the manifold to be Ricci-flat. However, given a K¨ahlermanifold with zero c1, the existence of a (unique) K¨ahlermetric in the same K¨ahlerclass with vanishing Ricci form is not self-evident. Followed by the work of Calabi [2] and Yau [3,4], mathematicians reached a great success in studying CY manifolds. Later, physicists realized the crucial role CY manifolds play in fundamental physics as aforementioned. Discoveries in physics enabled people to reconstruct the Standard Model from compactifications and also led to the mirror symmetry which is now a focused interface of mathematics and physics [5]. More details and discussions on the physcial predictions from CY manifolds can be found in [1]. Nowadays, thanks to the information age, we are able to let machines help us learn the structure of CY manifolds due to the large volume of data which has been compiled since the mid-1980s by physi- cists and mathematicians. This even brings computer science and data science into this interdisciplinary area. The outline is organized as follows. In PartI, we mainly focus on compact CY landscape. We start with a background on Calabi-Yau geometry. We also pay our attention to the complete intersection Calabi-Yaus (CICYs). Then we contemplate the non-compact case in Part II. In this part, more physics and mathematics, such as quivers and toric varieties, and their relations are discussed. Finally, we apply machine learning to the study of CY landscape in Part III. Along with a quick introduction to machine learning, we perform this technique to different topics in mathematics. In the appendices, some prerequisites are provided. 4 2 CALABI-YAU GEOMETRY IN MATH AND PHYSICS Part I Compact Calabi-Yau Landscape Some basic topological or geometric facts are given in AppendixA. For far more detailed treatment on what follows, we refer the reader to [6{9]. 2 Calabi-Yau Geometry in Math and Physics The story of Calabi-Yau manifolds originates in the mid-1950s with the following conjec- ture of Eugenio Calabi. Conjecture 2.1. (The Calabi Conjecture) Let (X; g; !) be a compact K¨ahlermanifold, 1;1 1;1 and fix R 2 Ω (X) such that [R] = c1(TX ) 2 H (X). Then there exists a unique K¨ahler metric ge with K¨ahlerform !e such that [!] = [!e], and R = Ric(!e) where Ric(!e) is the Ricci form of !e. The power of this conjecture is that it describes complicated geometric data (curvature) in terms of simpler topological data (Chern classes). For example, in complex dimension 1, this conjecture reduces to the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for Riemann surfaces, which says that the curvature is determined completely by the genus. In higher dimensions, the conjecture is that the curvature is controlled by the first Chern class (of the tangent bundle). Calabi himself proved the uniqueness part of his conjecture, but the existence remained an open problem for 20 years before Shing-Tung Yau completed the proof, for which he received the Fields Medal in 1982. Theorem 2.2. (Yau) The Calabi conjecture holds. We will be primarily interested in the special case of R = 0, in which we say that X admits a Ricci-flat metric. In general relativity, Riemannian manifolds with Ricci-flat metrics are vacuum solutions of Einstein's equations (that is, solutions without matter and energy). We are therefore interested in such manifolds which are K¨ahler. This leads us to the definition of a Calabi-Yau manifold1. Definition 2.3. Let X be a compact K¨ahlermanifold with dimC(X) = n. We say X is a Calabi-Yau n-fold if it admits a Ricci-flat metric2 of strictly SU(n) holonomy. 1In fact, the word \Calabi-Yau" was coined by physicists later [5] for Ricci-flat K¨ahlermanifolds. 2Yau's proof of the Calabi conjecture was not constructive, and to-date, there is not a single compact Calabi-Yau manifold where the Ricci-flat metric is known explicitly (outside of trivial cases of tori). This is an important open problem. 5 2 CALABI-YAU GEOMETRY IN MATH AND PHYSICS Let us give some low-dimensional examples of Calabi-Yau manifolds: 1. The only Calabi-Yau manifold of (complex) dimension 1 is an elliptic curve. Thus, there is a single topological type. 2. The Calabi-Yau manifolds of complex dimension 2 are called K3 surfaces. A simple construction is as a smooth quartic hypersurface in P3. All K3 surfaces are simply connected, and diffeomorphic to one another; so there is only one topological type. (Note that 4-dimensional tori are indeed Ricci flat, but they do not satisfy the condition on the holonomy group in the definition.) Proposition 2.4. For X as in the definition, the following are equivalent3: 1. X is a Calabi-Yau n-fold. 2. The first Chern class of X vanishes; c1(TX ) = 0. 3. There exists a covariantly constant spinor on X. 4. There exists a non-vanishing holomorphic n-form on X. ∼ 5. X is a smooth projective algebraic variety with trivial canonical line bundle !X = OX , Vn ∗ k where !X = TX , and which additionally satisfies H (X; OX ) = 0 for 0 < k < n. The final characterization in the proposition is clearly the preferable one in algebraic geometry. We can remove the hypothesis of projectivity, which results in non-compact Calabi-Yau manifolds, of interest to us in PartII. We could also allow for mild singularities, which inevitably arise when studying families of Calabi-Yau manifolds. Remark 2.5. One must beware of mildly different definitions of Calabi-Yau. Our definition excludes all tori (in particular, abelian varieties) and, for example, the threefold K3×E; the product of a K3 surface and an elliptic curve. These spaces admit Ricci-flat metrics, though of holonomy strictly contained in SU(n). In physics, this will translate into the low-energy theory having enhanced supersymmetry. Both abelian threefolds and K3×E are of interest in enumerative geometry. 3There are some subtleties in these propositions. The second one is actually weaker. For instance, complex tori with dimension greater than one have vanishing first Chern classes, but they fail to satisfy the fifth one.
Recommended publications
  • Kähler-Einstein Metrics and Algebraic Geometry
    Current Developments in Mathematics, 2015 K¨ahler-Einstein metrics and algebraic geometry Simon Donaldson Abstract. This paper is a survey of some recent developments in the area described by the title, and follows the lines of the author’s lecture in the 2015 Harvard Current Developments in Mathematics meeting. The main focus of the paper is on the Yau conjecture relating the ex- istence of K¨ahler-Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds to K-stability. We discuss four different proofs of this, by different authors, which have ap- peared over the past few years. These involve an interesting variety of approaches and draw on techniques from different fields. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. K-stability 3 3. Riemannian convergence theory and projective embeddings 6 4. Four proofs 11 References 23 1. Introduction General existence questions involving the Ricci curvature of compact K¨ahler manifolds go back at least to work of Calabi in the 1950’s [11], [12]. We begin by recalling some very basic notions in K¨ahler geometry. • All the K¨ahler metrics in a given cohomology class can be described in terms of some fixed reference metric ω0 and a potential function, that is (1) ω = ω0 + i∂∂φ. • A hermitian holomorphic line bundle over a complex manifold has a unique Chern connection compatible with both structures. A Her- −1 n mitian metric on the anticanonical line bundle KX =Λ TX is the same as a volume form on the manifold. When this volume form is derived from a K¨ahler metric the curvature of the Chern connection c 2016 International Press 1 2 S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Partial Differential Equations in Differential Geometry
    Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians Helsinki, 1978 The Role of Partial Differential Equations in Differential Geometry Shing-Tung Yau In the study of geometric objects that arise naturally, the main tools are either groups or equations. In the first case, powerful algebraic methods are available and enable one to solve many deep problems. While algebraic methods are still important in the second case, analytic methods play a dominant role, especially when the defining equations are transcendental. Indeed, even in the situation where the geometric abject is homogeneous or algebraic, analytic methods often lead to important contributions. In this talk, we shall discuss a class of problems in dif­ ferential geometry and the analytic methods that are involved in solving such problems. One of the main purposes of differential geometry is to understand how a surface (or a generalization of it) is curved, either intrinsically or extrinsically. Naturally, the problems that are involved in studying such an object cannot be linear. Since curvature is defined by differentiating certain quantities, the equations that arise are nonlinear differential equations. In studying curved space, one of the most important tools is the space of tangent vectors to the curved space. In the language of partial differential equations, the main tool to study nonlinear equations is the use of the linearized operators. Hence, even when we are facing nonlinear objects, the theory of linear operators is unavoidable. Needless to say, we are then left with the difficult problem of how precisely a linear operator approximates a non­ linear operator. To illustrate the situation, we mention five important differential operators in differential geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Calabi-Yau Theorem and Its Applications
    About the Calabi-Yau theorem and its applications { Krageomp program { Julien Keller L.A.T.P., Marseille University { Universit´ede Provence October 21, 2009 1 Any comments, remarks and suggestions are welcome. These notes are summing up the series of lectures given by the author during the Krageomp program (2009). Please feel free to contact the author at [email protected] 2 1 About complex and K¨ahlermanifolds In this lecture, starting with the background of Riemannian geometry, we introduce the notion of complex manifolds: • Definition using charts and holomorphic transition functions • Almost complex structure, complex structure and Newlander-Nirenberg theorem • Examples: the projective space , S2, hypersurfaces, weighted projective spaces • Uniformization theorem for Riemann surfaces, Chow's theorem (com- n plex compact analytic submanifolds of CP are actually algebraic vari- eties). We introduce the language of tensors on complex manifolds, and some natural invariants of the complex structure: • k-forms, exterior diffentiation operator, d = @ +@¯ decomposition, (p; q) forms • De Rham cohomology, Dolbeault cohomology, Hodge numbers, Euler characteristic invariant Using all the previous material, we can explain what is a K¨ahlermanifold. In particular we will formulate the Calabi conjecture on that space. • K¨ahlerforms, K¨ahlerclasses, K¨ahlercone n • The Fubini-Study metric on CP is a K¨ahlermetric Finally, we sketched the notion of holomorphic line bundle, the correspon- dence with divisor and Chern classes. This very classical material can be read in different books: - F. Zheng, Complex Differential Geometry, Studies in Adv. Maths, AMS (2000) 3 - W. Ballmann, Lectures on K¨ahlermanifolds, Lectures in Math and Physics, EMS (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • C Omp Act Riemann
    Jü rgen Jost C omp actRiemann S urfaces An Introduction to Contemporary Mathematics Third Edition With 23 Figures 123 Jü rgen Jost Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstr. 22 04103 Leipzig Germany e-mail: [email protected] Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 30F10, 30F45, 30F60, 58E20, 14H55 Library of Congress Control Number: 2006924561 ISBN-10 3-540-33065-8 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-33065-3 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Dupli- cation of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media springer.com © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006 PrintedinGermany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Erich Kirchner, Heidelberg Typesetting by the author and SPI Publisher Services using a Springer LATEX macro package Printed on acid-free paper 11689881 41/sz - 5 4 3 2 1 0 Dedicated to the memory of my father Preface The present book started from a set of lecture notes for a course taught to stu- dents at an intermediate level in the German system (roughly corresponding to the beginning graduate student level in the US) in the winter term 86/87 in Bochum.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Some canonical metrics on K¨ahlerorbifolds Mitchell Faulk Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 c 2019 Mitchell Faulk All rights reserved Abstract Some canonical metrics on K¨ahlerorbifolds Mitchell Faulk This thesis examines orbifold versions of three results concerning the existence of canonical metrics in the K¨ahlersetting. The first of these is Yau's solution to Calabi's conjecture, which demonstrates the existence of a K¨ahlermetric with prescribed Ricci form on a compact K¨ahlermanifold. The second is a variant of Yau's solution in a certain non-compact setting, namely, the setting in which the K¨ahlermanifold is assumed to be asymptotic to a cone. The final result is one due to Uhlenbeck and Yau which asserts the existence of K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics on stable vector bundles over compact K¨ahler manifolds. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Ricci-flat metrics on compact K¨ahlerorbifolds 4 2.1 Orbifold preliminaries . 7 2.1.1 Smooth orbifolds . 7 2.1.2 K¨ahlerorbifolds . 14 2.2 Elliptic operators on orbifolds . 18 2.3 Yau's theorem on orbifolds . 27 2.4 A uniform C3,α-estimate . 33 2.5 K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics for orbifolds with negative first Chern class . 39 2.6 Examples of Calabi-Yau orbifolds . 40 3 Ricci-flat metrics on asymptotically conical K¨ahlerorbifolds 55 3.1 Preliminaries . 60 3.2 Fredholm index of the Laplacian . 62 3.3 Case (ii) of Theorem 3.1 . 68 3.4 A priori estimates .
    [Show full text]
  • The Calabi–Yau Theorem and Kähler Currents
    ADV. THEOR. MATH. PHYS. Volume 20, Number 2, 381–404, 2016 The Calabi–Yau theorem and K¨ahler currents Valentino Tosatti Dedicated to Professor S.-T. Yau on the occasion of his 65th birthday In this note we give an overview of some applications of the Calabi– Yau theorem to the construction of singular positive (1, 1) currents on compact complex manifolds. We show how recent developments allow us to give streamlined proofs of existing results, as well as new ones. 1. Introduction The Calabi Conjecture [6], solved by S.-T. Yau in 1976 [48], says that on acompactK¨ahler manifold one can find K¨ahler metrics with prescribed Ricci form, equal to any given representative of the first Chern class of the manifold, and the solution is unique once we fix its cohomology class. Equivalently, one can find K¨ahler metrics with prescribed volume form and, when recast in this way, the Calabi–Yau Theorem is equivalent to saying that F n given a K¨ahler metric ω and a smooth function F with X (e − 1)ω =0, one can solve the complex Monge–Amp`ere equation √ √ (1.1) (ω + −1∂∂ϕ)n = eF ωn,ω+ −1∂∂ϕ > 0, sup ϕ =0, X and obtain a unique smooth solution ϕ. This result is one of the cornerstones of complex geometry, and it has found a myriad of applications, see e.g. [35]. In this note we discuss some of these applications to the construction prob- lem of singular closed positive currents on K¨ahler manifolds, where the basic technique is the “mass concentration” procedure of Demailly [13].
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Calabi's Conjectures and Kahler
    LECTURE NOTES ON CALABI'S CONJECTURES AND KAHLER-EINSTEIN¨ METRICS VED V. DATAR Abstract. These are lectures notes of a mini course on Calabi's conjectures and K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics, given as part of the Advanced Instructional School (AIS) in Riemannian geometry organized at Indian Institute of Science (IISc) in July 2019. Contents 1. Lecture-1: Calabi's conjectures1 1.1. A review of basic K¨ahlergeometry1 1.2. Prescribing Ricci curvature2 1.3. K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics4 2. Lecture-2: Analytic preliminaries5 2.1. Schauder estimates on Rm.6 2.2. Elliptic operators on compact Riemannian manifolds7 2.3. Poincare and Sobolev inequalities8 3. Lecture-3: Complex Monge-Ampere equations 10 3.1. Continuity method 12 3.2. Openness 12 4. Lecture-4: A priori estimates 15 4.1. C2-estimates 16 4.2. C3-estimate 18 5. Lecture-5: C0-estimate 20 6. Lecture-6: The Fano case 21 6.1. Obstructions of Futaki and Matsushima and the YTD conjecture 23 6.2. K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics along the smooth continuity method 24 Appendix A. Proof of Lemma 4.5 26 Acknowledgement 27 References 27 1. Lecture-1: Calabi's conjectures 1.1. A review of basic K¨ahlergeometry. Let (M; !) be a compact, connected K¨ahlermanifold. Then locally, the K¨ahlerform is given by p i j ! = −1gi¯jdz ^ dz¯ ; where fgi¯jg is a hermitian symmetric, positive definite matrix, such that gi¯j;k = gk¯j;i, where semi-colons denote derivatives. These conditions are of course equivalent to ! being a real, closed, positive (1; 1) form. Since ! is a closed, it determines a 1 2 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction The study of complex Monge–Amp`ere equations on compact K¨ahler manifolds is an important part of the interface between complex analysis and differential geometry. Prescribing the Ricci curvature, constructing K¨ahler–Einstein metrics, or finding met- rics of constant scalar curvature are problems that boil down to (or use in an essential way) solving a complex Monge–Amp`ere equation. Consider for example .! C ddc'/n D eF.'/; h n where ! is a K¨ahler form, n D dimC X, D e ! is a smooth volume form, and F a smooth function: solving the Calabi conjecture boils down to solving this equation when F Á 0, while constructing K¨ahler–Einstein metrics corresponds to F.'/ D',where is a real number whose sign is that of the first Chern class of the underlying manifold. In local coordinates, this equation for an unknown function ' can be written  à 2 @ ' F.'/Ch det !˛ˇ C D e det !˛ˇ ; @z˛@zˇ where the K¨ahler form ! is locally written as Xn ! D !˛ˇ idz˛ ^ dzˇ : ˛;ˇD1 It has been realized a few decades ago that it is necessary to deal with mildly singular complex algebraic varieties in order to study the birational classification of smooth complex algebraic manifolds in dimension 3. It is thus desirable to con- struct canonical metrics on varieties with mild singularities. If the singularities are sufficiently mild, one can still make sense of the key objects of study (canonical bundle, Ricci curvature, etc). The search for canonical metrics leads one to study degenerate complex Monge–Amp`ere equations where ! is merely semi-positive and D fdV is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue mea- sure, with density f 2 Lp, p>1, that might vanish or be unbounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Calabi-Yau Manifolds at the Interface of Math and Physics by Shiu-Yuen Cheng*, Lizhen Ji†, Liping Wang‡, and Hao Xu§
    Calabi-Yau Manifolds at the Interface of Math and Physics by Shiu-Yuen Cheng*, Lizhen Ji†, Liping Wang‡, and Hao Xu§ There were once a young man and an older man. could be built with them? Maybe there was not Their mathematics paths crossed and their names be- enough structure. How about adding complex struc- came merged into the long-lasting notion of Calabi- tures? Would they admit canonical metrics? Or per- Yau manifolds. haps there was still not enough structure. How about How did this happen? Why did Calabi make his Kähler manifolds—structures between complex ge- famous conjecture? How did Yau prove it? Why are ometry and algebraic geometry? This was what Calabi Calabi-Yau manifolds so important? And how are asked 60 years ago, and what Yau answered 24 years they used? All these and other questions take time to later. He cracked a geometric problem by unraveling answer and real experts to explain. They can probably hard nonlinear differential equations. be best understood through the interactions between The Calabi-Yau metric has been an invaluable tool math and physics, and that’s where their true value in differential and algebraic geometry. Here is an in- lies. Although these questions have a long history, complete list of long-standing conjectures and prob- the future will undoubtedly bring more questions and lems solved by using the Calabi-Yau metric and Yau’s surprises regarding Calabi-Yau manifolds. technique of the a priori estimate. Indeed, one must go back to more than 150 years 1. The Severi conjecture, that every complex sur- ago, when Riemann introduced the concepts of Rie- face that is homotopic to the complex projective mann surfaces and Riemannian metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Work of Shing-Tung Yau
    A brief overview of the work of Shing-Tung Yau Lizhen Ji Dept of Math University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 May 19, 2010 Abstract The purpose of this article is to give a brief overview of the work of Yau by compiling lists of his papers and books together with brief comments on some part of his work, and describing a sample of some open problems raised by him. It tries to complement other more detailed commentaries on particular aspects of his work by experts in this volume. We hope that such an overview will convey both the depth and width of his work. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 A summary of some major works of Yau 5 3 Topics Yau has worked on 6 4 Basics on K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics and Calabi conjectures 10 5 Some applications of K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics and Calabi-Yau manifolds 11 6 Harmonic maps 13 7 Rigidity of K¨ahlermanifolds 15 8 Super-rigidity of spaces of nonpositive curvature 20 9 Survey papers by Yau 21 10 Open problems by Yau 23 11 Books written and co-written by Yau 27 12 Books edited and co-edited by Yau 30 13 Ph.D. students of Yau 40 1 14 Partial list of papers and books of Yau 43 15 Papers and books by others 67 1 Introduction Shing-Tung Yau has revolutionized the broad field of geometric analysis by combining partial differ- ential equations with differential geometry and applying geometric analysis to algebraic geometry. Besides his celebrated solution to the Calabi conjecture on K¨ahler-Einsteinmetrics and applications of the Calabi-Yau manifolds to the string theory and the mirror symmetry, he has also initiated highly original approaches to harmonic analysis on manifolds by using gradient estimates and Har- nack inequalities, topology of manifolds using minimal surfaces, rigidity of complex manifolds and algebraic varieties using harmonic maps, and the positive mass conjecture in general relativity us- ing minimal surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Classics in Mathematics Arthur L Besse Einstein Manifolds Arthur L
    Classics in Mathematics Arthur L Besse Einstein Manifolds Arthur L. Besse Einstein Manifolds Reprint of the 1987 Edition With 22 Figures Springer Arthur L. Besse Originally published as Vol. 10 of the Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3rd series ISBN 978-3-540-74120-6 e-ISBN 978-3-540-74311-8 DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74311-8 Classics in Mathematics ISSN 1431-0821 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007938035 Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 54C25, 53-02, 53C21, 53C30, 34C55, 58D17, 58E11 © 2008, 2002,1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9,1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publi­ cation does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMX Design GmbH, Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper 987654321 sprmger.com Arthur L. Besse Einstein Manifolds With 22 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Mathematics Subject Classification (1980): 53 C 25, 53 C 55, 53 C 30, 83 C ..
    [Show full text]
  • Kähler-Einstein Metrics (Following Berman) Contents Contents
    Kähler-Einstein metrics (following Berman) Contents Contents Abstract In this essay, Berman’s proof of K-stability of Kähler-Einstein varieties is explained, assuming only basic knowledge of Kähler manifolds and algebraic geometry. After developing the necessary notions of connections and curvature on complex manifolds, a definition of a Kähler-Einstein form is first given for the smooth case, which is then generalised to Fano varieties. The Ding func- tional, which has Kähler-Einstein metrics as its minima, is also introduced. Test-configurations, the Donaldson-Futaki invariant and the K-stability con- dition are then introduced. The essay then proceed by giving an account of the Yau-Tian-Donaldson conjecture, which in general states that a polarised variety admits a Kähler-Einstein metric if and only if it is K-stable. Finally, an account of the proof of one direction in the Fano variety case, due to Berman, is given. This proof uses a special metric on the top Deligne pairing of the relative anticanonical line bundle on a test-configuration, whose weight over 0 is given by the Donaldson-Futaki invariant. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Definitions and notation 3 2.1 Background on metrics . .3 2.2 The Fano variety setting . .6 2.3 Test-configurations and K-stability . .9 3 The Yau-Tian-Donaldson conjecture 10 4 Proof of theorem 1.1 11 4.1 Extension of metrics to test configurations . 11 4.2 Deligne pairings . 12 4.3 Properties of the Ding metric . 15 4.4 Putting the pieces together . 20 Bibliography 21 1 1 Introduction 1 Introduction A Fano variety is a normal complex variety such that the anticanonical line bundle −KX is ample.
    [Show full text]