Gene Therapy (2012) 19, 169–175 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0969-7128/12 www.nature.com/gt

REVIEW Optogenetic therapy for retinitis pigmentosa

V Busskamp1,2, S Picaud3,4,5,6, JA Sahel3,4,5,6,7 and B Roska1

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) refers to a diverse group of progressive, hereditary diseases of the that lead to incurable blindness and affect two million people worldwide. Artificial photoreceptors constructed by gene delivery of light-activated channels or pumps (‘optogenetic tools’) to surviving cell types in the remaining retinal circuit has been shown to restore photosensitivity in animal models of RP at the level of the retina and cortex as well as behaviorally. The translational potential of this optogenetic approach has been evaluated using in vitro studies involving post-mortem human . Here, we review recent developments in this expanding field and discuss the potential and limitations of optogenetic engineering for the treatment of RP. Gene Therapy (2012) 19, 169–175; doi:10.1038/gt.2011.155; published online 13 October 2011

Keywords: ocular gene transfer; optogenetics; retina

POTENTIAL THERAPIES FOR RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA receptors and thus slow progression of the disease.13–18 Finally, there Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) refers to a diverse group of progressive, are a number of approaches that do not interfere with the intrinsic hereditary diseases that lead to incurable blindness and affect two progression of disease but attempt to restore photosensitivity by million people worldwide. RP commonly starts with night blindness creating new photosensors and coupling them to the remaining retinal in young adults, reflecting early degeneration of the highly sensitive circuitry. Patients who are legally blind are the key target population of rod photoreceptors. This is followed by a progressive decline in these therapies. Three different strategies are being investigated: (1) the daylight central vision, due to loss of function of the less-sensitive implantation of differentiated or undifferentiated photoreceptors,19 cone photoreceptors. Mutations in more than 44 genes have been (2) electronic retinal implants,20–22 and (3) the subject of this review, demonstrated in different forms of RP,1,2 but in about 50% of cases so-called ‘optogenetic’ approaches,23–25 which use genetically encoded the mutation has not yet been identified. Most of the known RP genes light sensors to make cells light responsive.26–28 The success of cell- are expressed in rods and in such cases degeneration of cones is implantation approaches depends on the formation of functional thought to be a secondary consequence of the death of the rods.3,4 synapses between the implanted photoreceptors and endogenous There is no cure for RP, but several approaches for the treatment for bipolar cells, and on functional retinal pigment epithelium to supply particular forms of RP are in clinical trials, and others are likely to be photoreceptors with 11-cis-retinal. Electronic retinal implants and introduced soon.5 These approaches can be divided into three groups. optogenetic approaches are similar in the sense that light is captured First, gene supplementation6 is conceptually simple and an attractive by an artificial photosensor and the current generated is used to strategy if, as is the case in most recessive forms of RP, the disease is stimulate retinal cells within the remaining retinal circuit. The key due to loss of function mutations. Progress in developing gene therapy difference between these two techniques lies in the way in which the for a form of Leber congenital amaurosis7 caused by defects in the light-generated current stimulates cells. In the case of electronic retinal pigment epithelium-specific gene, RPE65, has not only offered implants, the current is distributed extracellularly and activates cells hope for patients with this disease, but has also boosted general based o