DOCSLIB.ORG

District, Block & PHC Ranking- September 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
District, Block & PHC Ranking- September 2018 State top performers- September 2018 Best District Best Block Best PHC Sirohi Amet (Rajsamand) Parsola (Pratapgarh) District, Block & PHC Ranking- September 2018 District Rank District Best Block in District Best PHC in District 1 Sirohi Abu Road Anadara 2 Bikaner Bikaner Jamsar 3 Jaisalmer Jaisalmer Devikot 4 Ganganagar Anupgarh 365 RD 5 Bhilwara Asind Salavtiya 6 Pali Bali Chandaval 7 Rajsamand Amet Barar 8 Jalore Ahore Maalwara 9 Churu Churu Bhaleri 10 Baran Anta Sarthal 11 Ajmer Arain Saradhna 12 Jodhpur Balesar Setrawa 13 Tonk Deoli Jhilay 14 Nagaur Deedwana Merta Road 15 S.Madhopur Bonli Baler 16 Jaipur II Bassi Madhorajpura 17 Banswara Anandpuri Shergarh 18 Kota Chechat (Khairabad) Simliya 19 Pratapgarh Arnod Parsola 20 Hanumangarh Bhadra Ajitpura 21 Dholpur Bari Marena 22 Dausa Bandikui Khedala Bujurg 23 Bundi Bundi Bansi 24 Karauli Gudachandraji Kailadevi 25 Barmer Balotra Bharkha 26 Jhunjhunu Buhana Pilani 27 Jhalawar Bakani Gangdhar 28 Chittorgarh Bari Sadri Katunda 29 Sikar Danta Phagalwa 30 Dungarpur Aspur Bankora 31 Bharatpur Bayana Sevar 32 Alwar Bansur Partapgarh 0 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 33 Udaipur Bargaon Panarwa 34 Jaipur I Amber Pragpura Ajmer: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Ajmer 11 Number of % OPD % Del Drug Test Days State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon Change Change availability Availability reported Rank Rank attendance 1 Ajmer Pisangan Saradhna 148 88 100% 100% 93 12 27 2 1 2 Ajmer Srinagar Ramsar 177 66 100% 100% 87 13 25 5 2 3 Ajmer Kishangarh Karkedi 109 32 100% 100% 89 11 21 13 3 4 Ajmer Masooda Kharwa 165 44 100% 100% 93 10 17 18 4 5 Ajmer Kekri Baghera 192 27 100% 100% 91 13 14 23 5 6 Ajmer Bhinai Devliyakalan 59 27 0% 440% 90 13 27 93 6 7 Ajmer Arain Jhirota 37 21 0% 100% 84 15 25 131 7 8 Ajmer Bhinai Sarana 68 12 0% 140% 90 14 22 133 8 9 Ajmer Jawaja Rajiyawas 89 15 0% 200% 77 9 23 139 9 1 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Alwar: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Alwar 32 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Alwar Thanagazi Partapgarh 121 58 100% 100% 66 0 0 91 1 2 Alwar Rajgarh Gola ka bas 84 18 0% 100% 79 9 13 148 2 3 Alwar Bansur Karana 133 6 100% 20% 76 0 0 205 3 4 Alwar Shahjanpur Manjri Kala 70 10 0% 100% 36 14 10 211 4 5 Alwar Malakhera Chandoli 36 22 0% 100% 68 0 12 215 5 6 Alwar Reni Machri 96 1 0% 0% 78 13 21 227 6 7 Alwar Behror Bhetera 60 0 9% 0% 76 14 23 241 7 8 Alwar Kherli Mandi Ramnagar 60 4 8% 0% 65 10 15 255 8 9 Alwar Laxmangarh Harsana 64 0 1% 0% 55 11 23 261 9 10 Alwar Mundawar Jat Bahror 78 0 0% 0% 64 0 27 271 10 11 Alwar Kotkasim Jodiya 49 0 10% 0% 57 4 16 279 11 12 Alwar Tijara Ishroda 22 0 20% 0% 63 0 17 283 12 13 Alwar Kishangarhbas Bagherikala 26 0 0% 0% 65 0 0 286 13 2 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Banswara: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Banswara 17 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Banswara Bagidora Shergarh 118 33 100% 100% 87 14 20 9 1 2 Banswara Bagidora Nogama 142 61 100% 100% 70 13 18 29 2 3 Banswara Kushalgarh Choti Sarva 168 83 100% 100% 69 0 2 81 3 4 Banswara Choti Sarwan Danpur 79 69 0% 100% 80 13 14 98 4 5 Banswara Chota Dungara Kasarwadi 42 105 0% 100% 88 15 14 115 5 6 Banswara Anandpuri Naharpura 35 36 0% 100% 71 14 2 170 6 7 Banswara Partapur Odwada 48 13 0% 160% 87 13 13 171 7 8 Banswara Ghatol Khamera 73 109 0% 100% 78 0 0 184 8 9 Banswara Partapur Loharia 58 4 0% 0% 83 14 19 240 9 10 Banswara Talwara Kohala 64 0 9% 0% 88 14 9 244 10 11 Banswara Talwara Nayagaon 65 2 0% 0% 84 8 11 256 11 3 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Baran: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Baran 10 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Baran Chhipabaro Sarthal 123 32 100% 100% 62 15 26 20 1 2 Baran Kishanganj Bhanwargarh 130 14 100% 180% 65 10 22 62 2 3 Baran Baran Bamla 99 10 14% 100% 81 10 29 113 3 4 Baran Atru Chardana 67 1 11% 0% 58 14 26 243 4 5 Baran Chhabra Kolhukheda 68 0 4% 0% 64 11 18 257 5 6 Baran Anta Bamoriklan 0 0 0% 0% 67 15 30 270 6 4 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Barmer: district & PHC rankings (September 2018) District Rank Barmer 25 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Barmer Baytu Bharkha 102 84 100% 100% 86 13 25 7 1 2 Barmer Baytu Gida 111 46 100% 100% 74 12 30 12 2 3 Barmer Siwana Padru 110 35 100% 100% 44 7 13 68 3 4 Barmer Balotra Kitnod 62 33 0% 100% 67 7 29 126 4 5 Barmer Sheo Bhiyad 41 23 0% 100% 69 11 22 158 5 6 Barmer Dhorimana Gandhav Khurd 57 15 0% 200% 73 7 30 162 6 7 Barmer Chohtan Sata 74 87 0% 100% 46 0 26 174 7 8 Barmer Barmer Gagaria 45 113 0% 100% 71 0 23 175 8 9 Barmer Chohtan Mithrau 24 33 0% 100% 41 9 29 183 9 10 Barmer Siwana Ajeet 27 16 0% 220% 58 6 15 223 10 11 Barmer Sindhary Payalakalan 24 10 0% 100% 71 0 26 226 11 12 Barmer Sheo Jai Sindhar Gaown 31 12 18% 140% 44 0 24 231 12 13 Barmer Barmer Sanavada 49 6 0% 20% 70 10 12 253 13 14 Barmer Balotra Araba Chouhan 27 1 0% 0% 73 11 27 263 14 15 Barmer Dhorimana Loharwa 11 7 0% 40% 75 0 27 265 15 16 Barmer Balotra Navatala 35 0 0% 0% 73 10 14 276 16 5 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Bharatpur: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Bharatpur 31 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Bharatpur Sewar Sevar 344 50 100% 100% 92 12 22 8 1 2 Bharatpur Bhusawar Halena 203 60 100% 100% 84 14 9 25 2 3 Bharatpur Bayana Jhel Ka Bada 136 38 481% 100% 83 15 4 31 3 4 Bharatpur Rupbas Rudawal 258 78 100% 100% 84 9 14 34 4 5 Bharatpur Deeg Januthar 114 10 16% 100% 83 0 15 172 5 6 Bharatpur Nagar Gopalgarh 62 15 0% 200% 85 0 9 201 6 7 Bharatpur Kaman Ghata 52 0 37% 0% 89 11 30 216 7 8 Bharatpur Kumher Ambar 60 0 26% 0% 75 0 19 269 8 9 Bharatpur Nagar Mudia Nagar 27 0 0% 0% 86 8 16 274 9 10 Bharatpur Nadbai Barolichhar 43 2 0% 0% 78 0 9 280 10 6 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Bhilwara: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Bhilwara 5 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Bhilwara Mandalgarh Salavtiya 139 37 100% 100% 89 11 25 10 1 2 Bhilwara Banera Rayala 176 60 100% 100% 85 10 29 11 2 3 Bhilwara Gulabpura Hurda 212 15 100% 200% 88 14 25 32 3 4 Bhilwara Mandalgarh Singoli 124 18 100% 260% 82 10 25 43 4 5 Bhilwara Kotri Aama 67 63 0% 100% 95 14 29 66 5 6 Bhilwara Jahazpur Sakkargarh 142 15 100% 200% 67 11 7 74 6 7 Bhilwara Raipur Ashaholi 52 36 0% 100% 92 14 27 80 7 8 Bhilwara Asind Antali 49 28 0% 460% 85 13 26 103 8 9 Bhilwara Mandal Bemali 50 9 0% 80% 81 10 28 186 9 10 Bhilwara Suwana Gurla 73 6 0% 20% 82 10 19 225 10 11 Bhilwara Sahara Lakhola 54 3 12% 0% 89 10 21 239 11 12 Bhilwara Shahpura Kothiya 37 4 0% 0% 75 10 18 264 12 7 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Bikaner: District & PHC Rankings (September 2018) District Rank Bikaner 2 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Bikaner Bikaner Jamsar 100 60 100% 100% 88 15 20 6 1 2 Bikaner Loonkaransar Raner Damolai 170 51 100% 100% 83 12 0 46 2 3 Bikaner Nokha Kakku 75 25 0% 100% 90 14 28 75 3 4 Bikaner Dungergarh Bigga 39 53 5% 100% 89 15 27 88 4 5 Bikaner Nokha Badhnu 92 17 0% 100% 92 6 21 128 5 6 Bikaner Kolayat Gadiyala 97 52 0% 940% 0 15 14 176 6 8 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characteristics of Pegmatoidal Granite Exposed Near Bayalan, Ajmer District, Rajasthan
    Characteristics of pegmatoidal granite exposed near Bayalan, Ajmer district, Rajasthan Nilanjan Dasgupta1,∗, Taritwan Pal2, Joydeep Sen1 and Tamoghno Ghosh1 1Department of Geology, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata 700 073, India. 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, IIT Kharagpur, Midnapore, West Bengal, India. ∗e-mail: [email protected] The study involves the characterization of pegmatoidal granite, southeast of Beawar, Ajmer district, Rajasthan. Earlier researchers had described this granite as part of the BGC, basement to the Bhim Group of the Delhi Super Group rocks. However, the present study indicates that it is younger than the rocks of Bhim Group of South Delhi Fold Belt, into which it is intrusive. The intrusion is structurally controlled and the outcrop pattern is phacolithic. The granite had intruded post-D2 deformation of the Delhi orogeny along the axial planes of D2 folds. The intrusion has also resulted in the formation of a contact aureole about the calc gneisses. 1. Introduction host rocks by this emplacement have been studied. An attempt is made to fix the time of emplacement A long geological history since Middle Archaean with respect to the different deformational events is recorded in the Precambrian belt of Rajasthan. of the Delhi orogeny. The rocks of the study area fall within the The granites were earlier classified as basement ‘Delhi System’, defined in the pioneering study of rocks of pre-Delhi age (Heron 1953; Gupta 1934), Heron (1953), and now rechristened as the Delhi which is contrary to the present findings. Supergroup (Gupta and Bose 2000 and references therein) (figure 1). Within the study area around the small village of Bayalan, 10 km southeast of Beawar in Ajmer district of Rajasthan, pegma- 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Paper Dr Anjili Mathur Community Medicine Dr
    VOLUME - 9, ISSUE - 10, October - 2020 • PRINT ISSN No. 2277 - 8160 • DOI : 10.36106/gjra Original Research Paper Community Medicine EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE OF INITIAL COVID-19 PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SOUTHERN RAJASTHAN Associate Professor, Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Dr Anjili Mathur Udaipur Dr Chandan Assistant Professor, Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Fatehpuriya* Udaipur *Corresponding Author Senior Demonstrator,Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical Dr Shikha Mehta College,Udaipur Dr Vipin Mathur Senior Professor, Dept of Gastroenterology, RNT Medical College,Udaipur Resident Doctor,Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Dr Anum Fatima Udaipur Dr Shruti MBBS Priyadarshini ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to study its epidemiological and clinical characterstics OBJECTIVE: (1)To study epidemiological prole of rst 100 covid cases admitted at DCH MB Hospital. (2)To study progression of disease among these covid-19 cases for 28 days.METHODOLOGY:This is observational cross sectional study of rst hundred COVID-19 cases admitted at DCH, MB Hospital,Udaipur and followed up for 28 days.Data obtained from Case Investigation Form and indoor records.RESULT:Majority were males(60%)Mean age was 35.88 years in males and 35.99 years in females.History of contact present in 62% and travel in 13%.41% were symptomatic and 14% had comorbidity.Recovery had no signicant relation with gender,symptoms or comorbidity.Progression was good and CFR was 1%.CONCLUSION: Recovery and progression was good among the patients,need to avoid travel and contact with others was noticed and people with comorbidities required to be more alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Banswara District
    Banswara District Hydrogeological Atlas of Rajasthan Banswara District Contents: List of Plates Title Page No. Plate I Administrative Map 2 Plate II Topography 4 Plate III Rainfall Distribution 4 Plate IV Geological Map 6 Plate V Geomorphological Map 6 Plate VI Aquifer Map 8 Plate VII Stage of Ground Water Development (Block wise) 2011 8 Location of Exploratory and Ground Water Monitoring Plate VIII 10 Stations Depth to Water Level Plate IX 10 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Table Elevation Plate X 12 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Level Fluctuation Plate XI 12 (Pre-Post Monsoon 2010) Electrical Conductivity Distribution Plate XII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Chloride Distribution Plate XIII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Fluoride Distribution Plate XIV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Nitrate Distribution Plate XV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Plate XVI Depth to Bedrock 18 Plate XVII Map of Unconfined Aquifer 18 Glossary of terms 19 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP DISTRICT – BANSWARA Location: Banswara district is located in the extreme southern part of Rajasthan. It is bounded in the North by Dungarpur and Pratapgarh districts, in the west by Dungarpur district, in the East by state of Madhya Pradesh and South by state of Gujarat and. It stretches between 23⁰03' 22.98” to 23⁰ 55' 31.36” north latitude and 73⁰ 57' 12.92’’ to 74⁰ 46' 22.15’’ east longitude covering area of 4,493 sq km. Major part of the district has a systematic drainage system, as whole region is the part of ‘Mahi River Basin’. Administrative Set-up: Banswara district is administratively divided into ten Blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre–Feasibility Report
    PRE–FEASIBILITY REPORT Development of 8 lanes (Greenfield Highway) from Itawa (Ch. 284.000) to after Chambal River Banda Hera (Ch. 392.800) Section of NH-148 N (Total length 108.800 Km), Under BHARATMALA PRIYOJANA Lot-4/Pkg-4 in the state of Rajasthan June 2019 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by DPR Consultant on behalf of NHAI for the internal purpose and use of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC), Government of India. This document has been prepared based on public domain sources, secondary and primary research. The purpose of this report is to obtain Term of Reference (ToR) for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for Environmental Clearance to develop the Economic Corridors and Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana, Section of Lot 4/Pkg 4: Firozpur Jhirka – Kota section. It is, however, to be noted that this report has been prepared in best faith, with assumptions and estimates considered to be appropriate and reasonable but cannot be guaranteed. There might be inadvertent omissions/errors/aberrations owing to situations and conditions out of the control of NHAI and DPR Consultant. Further, the report has been prepared on a best-effort basis, based on inputs considered appropriate as of the mentioned date of the report. Neither this document nor any of its contents can be used for any purpose other than stated above, without the prior written consent from NHAI. Feasibility Report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction to the project ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Project Proponent ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Information Rajsamand District Rajasthan
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER INFORMATION RAJSAMAND DISTRICT RAJASTHAN WESTERN REGION JAIPUR 2013 2 RAJSAMAND DISTRICT AT A GLANCE Latitude (North) 24 o46'32" : 26 o01'36" Longitude (East) 73 o28'30":74 o18'55" Geographical area (sq. km) 4522.26 sq km Per cent area of the State 1.33 Altitude 532.50 m above mean sea Level No. of Tehsils & Name (7) Amet, Bhim, Deogarh, Khamnor, Kum bhalgarh, Railmagra, Rajsamand No. of Blocks & Name (7) Amet, Bhim, Deogarh, Khamnor, Kumbhalgarh, Railmagra, Rajsamand No. of Villages 1037 Population (as per 2011 Rural : 972777 census) Urban : 183820 Average annual rai nfall (mm) 524.37 mm (2001-2011) Major physiographical Rolling topography intersected by shallow valleys. Units Aravalli hills in the western part, central and eastern parts occupied by relatively plain area forming foothills of Aravallis. Alluvium more conspicuous and relatively thick. Major Drainage Banas river and its tributaries viz. Khari, Candrabhaga, Gomati, Kothari, Ahar etc. Land Use (ha) (As on 2010-11) (Source: Dte. Of Economics & Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI) Forest area 25952 Other uncultivable land 174425 excluding current fallows Fallow land 31087 Land not available for 126565 cultivation Net sown area 94697 Total cropped area 145629 Area sown more than once 50932 Principal crops (Source: Dte. Of Economics & Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI) (As on 2010-11) Crop Area (ha) Maize 63620 Wheat 31898 Jowar 8310 Barley 8472 Pulses 3508 Condiments & spices 1476 Oil seeds 13787 Fru its & vegetables 689 Fibre 2888 Irrigation by different sources (As on 2010-11) (Source: Dte.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Census Towns
    Directorate of Census Operations, Rajasthan List of Census Towns (Census-2011) MDDS-Code Sr. No. Town Name DT Code Sub-DT Code Town Code 1 099 00458 064639 3 e Village (CT) 2 099 00459 064852 8 LLG (LALGARH) (CT) 3 099 00463 066362 3 STR (CT) 4 099 00463 066363 24 AS-C (CT) 5 099 00463 066364 8 PSD-B (CT) 6 099 00464 066641 1 GB-A (CT) 7 101 00476 069573 Kolayat (CT) 8 101 00478 069776 Beriyawali (CT) 9 103 00487 071111 Malsisar (CT) 10 103 00487 071112 Nooan (CT) 11 103 00487 071113 Islampur (CT) 12 103 00489 071463 Singhana (CT) 13 103 00490 071567 Gothra (CT) 14 103 00490 071568 Babai (CT) 15 104 00493 071949 Neemrana (CT) 16 104 00493 071950 Shahjahanpur (CT) 17 104 00496 072405 Tapookra (CT) 18 104 00497 072517 Kishangarh (CT) 19 104 00498 072695 Ramgarh (CT) 20 104 00499 072893 Bhoogar (CT) 21 104 00499 072894 Diwakari (CT) 22 104 00499 072895 Desoola (CT) 23 104 00503 073683 Govindgarh (CT) 24 105 00513 075197 Bayana ( Rural ) (CT) 25 106 00515 075562 Sarmathura (CT) 26 107 00525 077072 Sapotra (CT) 27 108 00526 077198 Mahu Kalan (CT) 28 108 00529 077533 Kasba Bonli (CT) 29 109 00534 078281 Mandawar (CT) 30 109 00534 078282 Mahwa (CT) 31 110 00540 079345 Manoharpur (CT) 32 110 00541 079460 Govindgarh (CT) 33 110 00546 080247 Bagrana (CT) 34 110 00547 080443 Akedadoongar (CT) 35 110 00548 080685 Jamwa Ramgarh (CT) Page 1 of 4 Directorate of Census Operations, Rajasthan List of Census Towns (Census-2011) MDDS-Code Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Bikaner, Rajasthan
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 RAJASTHAN DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK BIKANER DISTRICT C. S. GUPTA OF THE INDlAN ADMINlS'l'RATlVE: SERVICE Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan Printed by Mafatlal Z. Gandhi. at Nayan Printing Preis. Ahmedabad-I. FOREWORD The Census data has always been considered as indispensable for day to day administration. ] t is increasingly being considered now as the foundation stone or' all regional planning. The publication of this series of District Census Handbooks wherein census statistics is made available for smaller territorial units is. therefore~ a significant occasion for it fills many existing gaps in statistics at the lower levels. Many interesting details have been revealed by the Census 1961 and I hope persons engaged in the administration of the State and public in general will appreciate the value and the effort that has gone into the production of such a standard book of reference. 1 congratulate the Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan, Shri C. S. Gupta I. A. S. and his colleagues who have done a good job with skill and perseverence. B. MEHTA JAIPUR, Chief Secretary 1st March, 1966. to the Government of Rajasthan. iii PREFACE The District Census Handbooks, to which series the present volume belongs. are the gifts of the Census of India and were first introduced in 1951. The 1961 series of District Census Handbooks are more elaborate than their counter-part in 1951 and present all important cen,slls data alon~with such other basic information as is very relevant for an understanding of the district. A wide variety of information which the Census 1961 collected: has already been released in several parts as mentioned elsewhere in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): a Comparative Analysis
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 8, August 2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): A Comparative Analysis G. L. Meena* and D. K. Jain** * Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan) ** Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, NDRI, Karnal (Haryana) Abstract- This study covered 75 cooperative member milk 1. To compare the cost and return of milk production producers and 75 non-member milk producers which were post- among different herd size categories of households stratified into small, medium and large herd size categories. Per across member and non-member in different seasons. day net maintenance cost was found to be higher for member 2. To compare the production, consumption and marketed group than that of non-member group. It was found to be higher surplus of milk among different herd size categories of in case of buffalo than that of cow and also observed more in the households across member and non-member in different summer season. Per litre cost of buffalo and cow milk production seasons. was observed to be higher for the non-member as compared to member group. Per litre cost of buffalo milk production decreased with increase in herd size categories across different II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE seasons while same trend was not observed in case of cow milk Attempts have been made to review briefly the specific and production. Further, it was found higher in summer season. Daily relevant literature, which has direct or indirect bearing on the net return was found relatively higher in member group as objectives of the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Onset of Southwest Monsoon – 2010
    INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT (MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES) SOUTHWEST MONSOON-2013 END OF SEASON REPORT For the state of RAJASTHAN Compiled By Dr. O.P. Singh, Scientist-F S.S. Singh, Scientist-F R.N. Kumawat, S.A. Ashok Kumar Sharma, S.A. 1 HIGHLIGHTS For the country as a whole, the rainfall for the season (June-September) was 106% of its long period average (LPA). However, for North West India this figure came out to 129% and 127% for the state of Rajasthan. Seasonal rainfall was 127% of its LPA over East Rajasthan and 128% of its LPA over West Rajasthan. Southwest Monsoon current advanced over the Andaman Sea 3 days earlier than its normal date of 20th May and set in over Kerala on its normal date of 1st June. The southwest Monsoon set over South Eastern parts of the state on 13th June, about 2 days early. It progressed further very rapidly and covered the entire state by 16th June, about 1 month earlier than its normal date of 15th July. The withdrawal of Monsoon from west Rajasthan commenced on 9th September compared to its normal date of 1st September. After 19th, further withdrawal of southwest Monsoon was stalled for about one month with the successive formation of two low pressure areas and their westward movement across the central parts of the country. The Monsoon withdrew from the whole state on 17th October, 2013, delay of about 22 days from the LPA. Monthly rainfall over the state was 138% of LPA in June, 127% of LPA in July, 133% of LPA in August and 104% of LPA in September.
    [Show full text]
  • District Profile Pali, Rajasthan
    District Profile Pali, Rajasthan Pali District has an area of 12,387 km². The district lies between 24° 45' and 26° 29' north latitudes and 72°47' and 74°18' east longitudes. The Great Aravali hills link Pali district with Ajmer, Rajsamand, Udaipur and Sirohi Districts. The district has 10 blocks, as recorded in 2014—Jaitaran, Raipur, Sojat, Rohat, Pali, Marwar Junction, Desuri, Sumerpur and Bali. DEMOGRAPHY As per Census 2011, the total population of Pali is 2037573. The percentage of urban population in Pali is 22.6 percent. Out of the total population there are 1025422 males and 1012151 females in the district. This gives a sex ratio of 987 females per 1000 males. The decadal growth rate of population in Rajasthan is 21.31 percent, while Pali reports a 11.94 percent of decadal increase in the population. The district population density is 164 in 2011. The Scheduled Caste popula- tion in the district is 19.53 percent while Scheduled Tribe comprises 7.09 percent of the population. LITERACY The overall literacy rate of district is 62.39 percent while the male & female literacy rate is 76.81 and 48.01 percent respectively. At the block level, a con- siderable disparity is noticeable in the male-female literacy rate. Pali block has the highest male literacy rate of 82.56 percent and female literacy rate of 57.09 percent. Similarly, the lowest male and female literacy rate is found in Bali (71.58 percent) and Jaitaran (41.62 percent) blocks respectively. Source: Census 2011 A significant difference is notable in the literacy rate of rural and urban Pali.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Scenario Baran District
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER SCENARIO BARAN DISTRICT WESTERN REGION JAIPUR 2013 GROUND WATER SCENARIO BARAN DISTRICT S. No. Item Information 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical area (sq. km) 6955.31 Administrative Divisions a. No. of tehsils / blocks 08/07 b. No. of villages 1114 inhabited 126 non habited c. No. of towns 4 d. No. of municipalities 4 Population (as per 2011 census) 1222755 Average annual rainfall (mm) (2001 - 707 2011) 2. GEOMORPHOLOGY Major physiographical Units Hill ranges of Vindhyans in the northeast and low rounded hills of Malwa plateau in the south bound the region. Sedimentary rocks of Vindhyan Supergroup occupy northwestern part. Major Drainage The drainage system is well developed and represented by Chambal, which is perennial in nature. 3. LAND USE (ha) (2010-11) Forest area 216494 Net sown area 338497 Cultivable area (net sown area + 366348 fallow land) 4. MAJOR SOIL TYPES 1. Deep black clayey soil 2. Deep brown loamy soil 3. Red gravelly loam hilly soil 5. AREA UNDER PRINCIPAL CROPS (ha) (2010-11) Food grains Bajra : 3472 Jowar : 2006 Wheat : 147930 Barley : 559 Rice : 8231 Maize : 16913 Total Pulses 10872 Total Oil seeds 311473 Total Condiments & Spices 67818 6. IRRIGATI ON BY DIFFERENT Net Area irrigated Gross area SOURCES (ha) irrigated Canal 54485 57488 S. No. Item Information Tank 2376 3137 Tubewells 191558 200258 Other wells 28252 28293 Other sources 16052 16820 Total 292723 306626 7. NUMBER OF GROUND WATER MONITORING WELLS OF CGWB No. of dug wells 20 No. of piezometers 1 8. PREDOMINENT GEOLOGICAL Upper Vindhyan, Bhander Group, FORMATIONS Ganurgarh shales, Bhander limestone and Bhander sandstone overlain by Deccan traps and alluvium of Quaternary age.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Pearl Millet Varieties with Farmers in Barmer District
    \ EVALUATING PEARL MILLET VARIETIES WITH FARMERS IN BARMER DISTRICT M.K. Choudhary, E. Weltzien R., and M.M. Sharma ABSTRACT A newly formed NGO, operating in Barmer district in western Rajasthan, applied and modified methods of farmerparticipatory variety evaluation develop by ICRISA Tscientists in otheri'egions of Rajasthan. Barmer district has the largest area under pearl millet of all the Indian districts; it is characterized by low and erratic annual rainfall. The first year results of varietal evaluations with farmers indicated that farmers from Barmer district assigned the two highest ranks to varieties with medium to late maturity, large panicles andhigh yieldpotential. The farmers from the more sandy, drierareas of Barmerdistrict didprefer higher tillering, earliermaturir~yvarieties, commonly with larger grain size as a secondary group of desirable materials. The traits used to compare varieties most often were also the characteristics of the most preferred varieties. Farmers insisted on at least one more year of such evaluations before a decision on initial adoption of any of these varieties could be taken. INTRODUCTION The Society to Uplift Rural Economy (SURE) has recently begun to manage and direct a Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), a farmer training center, with the approval of Ihe Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). In collaboration with ICRISAT, the KVK has started a program to identify cultivars of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] suitable for cultivation in Barmer district. Barmer district has no previous research results on the adaptation of newly released varieties of pearl millet.' The current program was designed to evaluate a broad range of genetic diversity on the KVK-farm and on farmers' fields.
    [Show full text]