DOCSLIB.ORG

Slime Molds As a Valuable Source of Antimicrobial Agents Vida Tafakori*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Slime Molds As a Valuable Source of Antimicrobial Agents Vida Tafakori* Tafakori AMB Expr (2021) 11:92 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-021-01251-3 MINI-REVIEW Open Access Slime molds as a valuable source of antimicrobial agents Vida Tafakori* Abstract Given the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogens, the number of efective antimicrobial agents to deal with the threat of bacterial and fungal resistance has fallen dramatically. Therefore, the critical solution to deal with the missing efective antibiotics is to research new sources or new synthetic antibiotics. Natural products have diferent advan- tages to be considered antimicrobial agents. There are diferent natural sources for antimicrobial agents, such as bac- teria, fungi, algae, slime molds, and plants. This article has focused on antibiotics from slime molds, especially Myxo- mycetes. The reason why slime molds have been chosen to be studied is their unique bioactive metabolites, especially over the past couple of decades. Some of those metabolites have been demonstrated to possess antibiotic activities. Hence, this article has focused on the potential of these creatures as an alternative source of antibiotics. Keywords: Multidrug, Resistance, Antibiotics, Natural products, Myxomycetes Introduction the third leading cause of death in the US behind heart In 1940, Edward Abraham and Ernest Chain at Oxford disease and cancer (Ahmad et al. 2021). Tus, infectious University in the United Kingdom afected the Escheri- diseases are still concerned among the most important chia coli extraction on the penicillin and proved the global social challenge of the world. existence of a penicillinase, which was able to inactivate Reports estimate that, by 2050, 10 million people will penicillin, warning about intrinsic antibiotic resistance. die every year with an estimated economic cost of $100 Tis happened soon after the discovery of penicillin trillion due to antimicrobial resistance unless a global in 1928 when the drug was not being used yet (Amenu response is mounted to this problem (Simpkin et al. 2014). Antibiotics, these “wonder drugs,” were used 2017). Accordingly, the critical solution to deal with the to treat injured soldiers and wounded civilians during missing efective antibiotics is to study on new sources or World War II. However, after penicillin came into clini- new synthetic antibiotics. cal use, the additional bacteria developed the ability to In the antimicrobial resistance process, microbial cells resist other antibiotics, unfortunately. Nowadays, the have developed a complex and redundant barrier to pen- appearance of multidrug-resistant bacteria (Table 1) has etration, enzymes to destroy or modify, and pumps to made antimicrobial resistance a major threat to global efux the antibiotic compounds. Hence, between natu- health and development. Te emerging multidrug-resist- ral products and synthetic ones, the former is preferable ant pathogens have dramatically lowered the number of since as the microbial cells evolve and gain the ability to efective antimicrobial agents to deal with the threat of develop resistance against antimicrobial agents, natural bacterial and fungal resistance. Te provisional leading products also evolve in nature. Another reason is that in cause-of-death rankings for 2020 indicate COVID-19 as the drug discovery sector, synthetic antibiotics are most favor human bioactivity, not suitable for microbial biol- ogy (Wright 2014). On the other hand, natural products *Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] refect the true chemical diversity (extensive functional Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Kharazmi group chemistry and chirality), which does not exist University, Tehran, Iran © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Tafakori AMB Expr (2021) 11:92 Page 2 of 12 Table 1 Multidrug resistant bacteria observed in the community (Duin and Paterson 2016) Multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype Epidemiologic setting of community-onset Major antibiotics resistance mechanisms infections Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) Household colonization; farm animal exposure mecA, mecC (emerging) Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) Typically health care-associated vanA, vanB Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Extremely rare Carbapenemases (CRAB) Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Extremely rare Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, carbapen- emases, and efux systems Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- Endemic in Asia; in low-prevalence areas travel Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and efux producing Enterobacteriaceae to Asia systems Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Rare at present; emerging in India and China Carbapenemases in synthetic products (Phillipson 2007). On the other products the preferable choice for antimicrobial agent hand, for some natural products, the apparent lack of sources. industrial interest may be due to the inherent time-con- suming working process with natural products, difcul- Natural sources of antimicrobial agents ties in access and supply, costs of collection, extraction, Although antibiotics generally refer to antibacterials, and isolation, and standardization limitations of crude since the term has not exactly been defned, it encom- drugs (Phillipson 2007; Harvey 2008). However, despite passes a wide variety of agents, including antibacterial, all these problems, their advantages still make natural antifungal, antiviral, and antiparasitic drugs (Chees- brough 2006). Fig. 1 The life cycle of a plasmodial slime mold includes sexual and asexual reproduction Tafakori AMB Expr (2021) 11:92 Page 3 of 12 Fig. 2 a Plasmodium of the slime mold Physarum sp. b Sporangia of Physarum polycephalum (https:// calph otos. berke ley. edu) Free amoeba Zygote Sexual production Spores Emerging amoebas Mature fruiting Emerging body with spores amoebas Free amoebas Developing Asexual begin to aggregate fruiting body production Slug or moving Amoeba mass amoeba Fig. 3 Life cycle of a cellular slime mold Tere are diferent natural sources of antimicrobial (Primon-Barros and José Macedo 2017; Han et al. 2011), agents, such as flamentous bacteria actinomycetes (more and other natural sources. than 50% of all antibiotics are produced by these micro- Tere are diferent approaches for efective drug dis- organisms), non-flamentous bacteria (10–15%) (Demain covery programs: bioactive-guided screening, chemical 2014; Salehghamari et al. 2015), microscopic fungi screening, target-oriented screening, the use of unex- (about 20% of all antibiotics are produced by flamen- plored strains, genome mining (using next-generation tous fungi) (Demain 2014), slime molds, algae (Ibrahim DNA sequencing), and activation of silent gene clusters and Lim 2015; Pane et al. 2015), plants (Abreu et al. 2012; (Wohlleben et al. 2016). Among diferent natural sources Tafakori and Nasiri 2018; Eftekhar et al. 2005), animals mentioned above, some have received extra attention, Tafakori AMB Expr (2021) 11:92 Page 4 of 12 Fig. 4 a Fuligo septica, b Physarum gyrosum c Arcyria denudata (https:// www. natur epl. com, https:// www. disco verli fe. org) such as actinomycetes, microscopic fungi, and plants. Slime molds types However, the others, such as slime molds, have not Acellular slime molds been taken into account and can be considered unex- Te life cycle of this group of slime molds encompasses plored strains. Terefore, this article has focused on the two strikingly diferent trophic (feeding) stages. Te potential of these creatures as an alternative source of plasmodium structure, consisting of a distinctive multi- antibiotics. nucleate mass, involves as many as 10,000 dividing nuclei without individual cell membranes. Tis color- Slime molds ful protoplasm creeps along in amoeboid fashion over Slime molds are protists with two stages in their life moist, cool, and shaded places, such as within cracks of cycles. In one stage, they behave like protozoa (amoeba) decomposing wood, underneath the partially decayed while acting like fungi in the other. In the protozoan bark of tree trunks and stumps, or other organic mat- phase, they engulf food particles, other microbes and ter in high humidity condition, and in leaf debris on the consuming decaying vegetation. Tese microorganisms forest foor which degrades and feeding by endocytosis are included in two groups: acellular slime molds (Myxo- (Willey et al. 2014; Dembitsky et al. 2005). Te other gastria) and cellular slime molds (Dictyostelium) (Wil- stage of its life cycle starts when plasmodium mass is ley et al. 2014). Recently, slime molds have been known starved or dried. At this time, the plasmodium typically as good resources of natural compounds with bioactiv- diferentiates and develops fruiting bodies containing ity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Myxomycetes NMW 2012Orange, Updated KS 2017.Docx
    Myxomycete (Slime Mould) Collection Amgueddfa Cymru-National Museum Wales (NMW) Alan Orange (2012), updated by Katherine Slade (2017) Myxomycetes (true or plasmodial slime moulds) belong to the Eumycetozoa, within the Amoebozoa, a group of eukaryotes that are basal to a clade containing animals and fungi. Thus although they have traditionally been studied by mycologists they are distant from the true fungi. Arrangement & Nomenclature Slime Mould specimens in NMW are arranged in alphabetical order of the currently accepted name (as of 2012). Names used on specimen packets that are now synonyms are cross referenced in the list below. The collection currently contains 157 Myxomycete species. Specimens are mostly from Britain, with a few from other parts of Europe or from North America. The current standard work for identification of the British species is: Ing, B. 1999. The Myxomycetes of Britain and Ireland. An Identification Handbook. Slough: Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd. Nomenclature follows the online database of Slime Mould names at www.eumycetozoa.com (accessed 2012). This database is largely in line with Ing (1999). Preservation The feeding stage is a multinucleate motile mass known as a plasmodium. The fruiting stage is a dry, fungus-like structure containing abundant spores. Mature fruiting bodies of Myxomycetes can be collected and dried, and with few exceptions (such as Ceratiomyxa) they preserve well. Plasmodia cannot be preserved, but it is useful to record the colour if possible. Semi-mature fruiting bodies may continue to mature if collected with the substrate and kept in a cool moist chamber. Collected plasmodia are unlikely to fruit. Specimens are stored in boxes to prevent crushing; labels should not be allowed to touch the specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Burmese Amber Taxa
    Burmese (Myanmar) amber taxa, on-line supplement v.2021.1 Andrew J. Ross 21/06/2021 Principal Curator of Palaeobiology Department of Natural Sciences National Museums Scotland Chambers St. Edinburgh EH1 1JF E-mail: [email protected] Dr Andrew Ross | National Museums Scotland (nms.ac.uk) This taxonomic list is a supplement to Ross (2021) and follows the same format. It includes taxa described or recorded from the beginning of January 2021 up to the end of May 2021, plus 3 species that were named in 2020 which were missed. Please note that only higher taxa that include new taxa or changed/corrected records are listed below. The list is until the end of May, however some papers published in June are listed in the ‘in press’ section at the end, but taxa from these are not yet included in the checklist. As per the previous on-line checklists, in the bibliography page numbers have been added (in blue) to those papers that were published on-line previously without page numbers. New additions or changes to the previously published list and supplements are marked in blue, corrections are marked in red. In Ross (2021) new species of spider from Wunderlich & Müller (2020) were listed as being authored by both authors because there was no indication next to the new name to indicate otherwise, however in the introduction it was indicated that the author of the new taxa was Wunderlich only. Where there have been subsequent taxonomic changes to any of these species the authorship has been corrected below.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Chapter 19 Kingdom Protista Domain Eukarya Description Kingdom Protista Is the Most Diverse of All the Kingdoms
    Biology Chapter 19 Kingdom Protista Domain Eukarya Description Kingdom Protista is the most diverse of all the kingdoms. Protists are eukaryotes that are not animals, plants, or fungi. Some unicellular, some multicellular. Some autotrophs, some heterotrophs. Some with cell walls, some without. Didinium protist devouring a Paramecium protist that is longer than it is! Read about it on p. 573! Where Do They Live? • Because of their diversity, we find protists in almost every habitat where there is water or at least moisture! Common Examples • Ameba • Algae • Paramecia • Water molds • Slime molds • Kelp (Sea weed) Classified By: (DON’T WRITE THIS DOWN YET!!! • Mode of nutrition • Cell walls present or not • Unicellular or multicellular Protists can be placed in 3 groups: animal-like, plantlike, or funguslike. Didinium, is a specialist, only feeding on Paramecia. They roll into a ball and form cysts when there is are no Paramecia to eat. Paramecia, on the other hand are generalists in their feeding habits. Mode of Nutrition Depends on type of protist (see Groups) Main Groups How they Help man How they Hurt man Ecosystem Roles KEY CONCEPT Animal-like protists = PROTOZOA, are single- celled heterotrophs that can move. Oxytricha Reproduce How? • Animal like • Unicellular – by asexual reproduction – Paramecium – does conjugation to exchange genetic material Animal-like protists Classified by how they move. macronucleus contractile vacuole food vacuole oral groove micronucleus cilia • Protozoa with flagella are zooflagellates. – flagella help zooflagellates swim – more than 2000 zooflagellates • Some protists move with pseudopods = “false feet”. – change shape as they move –Ex. amoebas • Some protists move with pseudopods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Myxomycetes on Different Decay Stages of Trunks of Picea Abies, Pinus Sylvestris and Betula Spp. in a Small Oldgrowth Forest in Southern Finland
    Karstenia 42: 13- 22, 2002 The occurrence of myxomycetes on different decay stages of trunks of Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris and Betula spp. in a small oldgrowth forest in southern Finland TARJA UKKOLA UKKOLA, T. 2002: The occurrence of myxomycetes on different decay stages of trunks of Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris and Betula spp. in a small oldgrowth forest in southern Finland. - Karstenia 42: 13- 22. Helsinki. ISSN 0453-3402. The occurrence of myxomycetes was studied on fallen trunks of Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, and Betula spp. (B. pendula and B. pubescens) in a small oldgrowth forest in southern Finland in May 1998 - September 1999. The study site is located in Luukkaa Recreation Area, and was left in pristine state in 1966. The sample trunks were chosen to represent different stages of decomposition and checked every second or fourth > eek in all for 17 times. A total of 325 myxomycete specimens representing 44 taxa in 16 genera were observed. Four taxa, Comatricha pulchella var. fusca, Lycogala exiguum, Licea cf. pus ilia, and Physarum bethelii are new records to Finland. During the study, myxomycetes were most abundant on decomposing trunks of Betula spp. (123 specimens), especially on well-decayed trunks. The species diversity was about the same on all studied tree species: 27 taxa were recorded on P abies and P sylvestris, and 22 on Betula spp. The largest di ersity was on two pine trunks with fairly soft wood (a total of 19 taxa). The common myxomycetes, Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa and Lycogala epidendrum, represent generalists in this study, being abundant and present at nearly all decay stages of all studied tree species.
    [Show full text]
  • Slime Moulds
    Queen’s University Biological Station Species List: Slime Molds The current list has been compiled by Richard Aaron, a naturalist and educator from Toronto, who has been running the Fabulous Fall Fungi workshop at QUBS between 2009 and 2019. Dr. Ivy Schoepf, QUBS Research Coordinator, edited the list in 2020 to include full taxonomy and information regarding species’ status using resources from The Natural Heritage Information Centre (April 2018) and The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (February 2018); iNaturalist and GBIF. Contact Ivy to report any errors, omissions and/or new sightings. Based on the aforementioned criteria we can expect to find a total of 33 species of slime molds (kingdom: Protozoa, phylum: Mycetozoa) present at QUBS. Species are Figure 1. One of the most commonly encountered reported using their full taxonomy; common slime mold at QUBS is the Dog Vomit Slime Mold (Fuligo septica). Slime molds are unique in the way name and status, based on whether the species is that they do not have cell walls. Unlike fungi, they of global or provincial concern (see Table 1 for also phagocytose their food before they digest it. details). All species are considered QUBS Photo courtesy of Mark Conboy. residents unless otherwise stated. Table 1. Status classification reported for the amphibians of QUBS. Global status based on IUCN Red List of Threatened Species rankings. Provincial status based on Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre SRank. Global Status Provincial Status Extinct (EX) Presumed Extirpated (SX) Extinct in the
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Plasmodial Slime Moulds (Myxogastria): Measurement and Interpretation
    Protistology 1 (4), 161–178 (2000) Protistology August, 2000 Biodiversity of plasmodial slime moulds (Myxogastria): measurement and interpretation Yuri K. Novozhilova, Martin Schnittlerb, InnaV. Zemlianskaiac and Konstantin A. Fefelovd a V.L.Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, b Fairmont State College, Fairmont, West Virginia, U.S.A., c Volgograd Medical Academy, Department of Pharmacology and Botany, Volgograd, Russia, d Ural State University, Department of Botany, Yekaterinburg, Russia Summary For myxomycetes the understanding of their diversity and of their ecological function remains underdeveloped. Various problems in recording myxomycetes and analysis of their diversity are discussed by the examples taken from tundra, boreal, and arid areas of Russia and Kazakhstan. Recent advances in inventory of some regions of these areas are summarised. A rapid technique of moist chamber cultures can be used to obtain quantitative estimates of myxomycete species diversity and species abundance. Substrate sampling and species isolation by the moist chamber technique are indispensable for myxomycete inventory, measurement of species richness, and species abundance. General principles for the analysis of myxomycete diversity are discussed. Key words: slime moulds, Mycetozoa, Myxomycetes, biodiversity, ecology, distribu- tion, habitats Introduction decay (Madelin, 1984). The life cycle of myxomycetes includes two trophic stages: uninucleate myxoflagellates General patterns of community structure of terrestrial or amoebae, and a multi-nucleate plasmodium (Fig. 1). macro-organisms (plants, animals, and macrofungi) are The entire plasmodium turns almost all into fruit bodies, well known. Some mathematics methods are used for their called sporocarps (sporangia, aethalia, pseudoaethalia, or studying, from which the most popular are the quantita- plasmodiocarps).
    [Show full text]
  • Culturing Slime Mold
    Culturing Slime Mold Live Material Care Guide SCIENTIFIC BIO Background FAX! Plasmodial slime mold (phylum Myxomycota) lives in dark, moist environments such as under the bark of decaying logs, among mulch, or beneath decaying leaves. Slime mold classification is once again changing. They were in Protista due to their amoeboid-like properties. In the past, slime molds were considered a fungus because they produce fruiting bodies and spores used for reproduction. Slime molds are a group notable for its unwillingness to be neatly classified! Frequently bright in color and large in size (up to 30 cm in diameter), plasmodial slime molds consist of many amoeba-like cells, which form a mass of protoplasm called myxomycota. The organisms are capable of very slow, creeping movement by means of cytoplasmic streaming. During the reproductive stage, called pseudoplasmodium, slime molds tend to migrate to a well-lit area, such as the top of a log, where less moisture is present. They form into a slug-like mass and produce reproductive fruiting bodies, which contain spores. Under adverse conditions (lack of food, water, light, warmth, or pH changes), the organism dries out and forms a hardened mass called a sclerotium. These sclerotia may also grow fruiting bodies, but do not release spores into the environ- ment until conditions once again become favorable for growth. Spores are transported by wind, which results in the spreading of slime molds to new areas. Sclerotium (unfavorable conditions) Pseudoplasmodium (favorable conditions) Aggregate (plasmodial stage) Amoeba/spores Reproductive Fruiting Bodies Figure 1. Life Cycle of Slime Mold Culturing/Media Slime mold is typically cultured from sclerotia rather than from spores.
    [Show full text]
  • Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity
    Glime, J. M. 2019. Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 3-1-1 Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SLIME MOLDS: BIOLOGY AND DIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Slime Molds? ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Identification Difficulties ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1- Reproduction and Colonization ........................................................................................................................... 3-1-5 General Life Cycle ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 Seasonal Changes ......................................................................................................................................... 3-1-7 Environmental Stimuli ............................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 Light .................................................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 pH and Volatile Substances
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Zoospore Cytoskeleton in Symphytocarpus Impexus, Arcyria Cinerea and Lycogala Epidendrum (Eumycetozoa)
    Protistology 3 (1), 1529 (2003) Protistology A comparative study of zoospore cytoskeleton in Symphytocarpus impexus, Arcyria cinerea and Lycogala epidendrum (Eumycetozoa) Serguei A. Karpov1, Yuri K. Novozhilov2 and Ludmila V. Chistiakova3 1 Biological and Soil Science Faculty of St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2 Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 3 Biological Research Institute of St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia Summary The ultrastructure of zoospores of the myxogastrids Symphytocarpus impexus B. Ing et Nann.Bremek. (Stemoniida), Arcyria cinerea (Bull.) Pers. (Trichiida), and Lycogala epidendrum (L.) Fr. (Liceida) is reported for the first time, with special reference to flagellar apparatus. The cytoskeleton in all three species includes microtubular and fibrillar rootlets arising from both basal bodies of the flagellar apparatus. There is a similarity in the presence and position of the rootlets N15 between our species and other studied species of myxogastrids and protostelids. Thus, general conservatism of cytoskeletal characters and homology among eumycetozoa have been confirmed for these taxa. At the same time there is variation in the details of flagellar rootlets’ structure in different orders and genera. The differences concern the shape of short striated fibre (SSF) which is an organizing structure for microtubular rootlets r2, r3 and r4. Its upper strand is more prominent in L. epidendrum. The fibrillar part of rootlet 1 is connected to basal body 1 in S. impexus, to basal body 2 in A. cinerea, and to both basal bodies in L. epidendrum. The rootlets r4 and r5 are very conservative and consist, correspondigly, of 7 and 2 microtubules in all three species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Cellular Slime Molds John Tyler Bonner Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University
    A Brief History of the Cellular Slime Molds John Tyler Bonner Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Fungi have been known and their unique character recognized ter and that this paper was his Ph.D. work. Unfortunately, he left for as long as there has been natural history. They were known to biology, and this was his last contribution to science. Aristotle which puts an early well established mention of them From 1900 onward there were two main thrusts in cellular well over 3000 years ago. By contrast, the cellular slime molds slime mold research: one was systematics that led more recently were first discovered a mere 140 years ago. The reason for this to phylogeny, and the other is a search for the mechanisms under- great discrepancy is obvious: cellular slime molds are minute lying their development and behavior. The first has been carried and inconspicuous compared to huge, eye-catching mushrooms. out by a small group of individuals compared to the latter, which And there are other such examples all stemming from the rise of has become an industry. microscopy in the 19th century. Perhaps best of all is the stun- The discovery of new species has risen steadily. The two of ning work of Roland Thaxter, who discovered two entirely new Brefeld and a few others described by others in the latter part groups of organisms: the myxobacteria and the Laboulbeniales, of the 19th century were brought together by Olive (with some those curious fungi that were previously thought to be the hairs additions of his own) showing about a dozen species in all.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue
    OMPHALINA Special Issue ISSN 1925-1858 Newsletter of Sept 2019 • Vol X, No. 3 OMPHALINA, newsletter of Foray Newfoundland & Labrador, has no fi xed schedule of publication, and no promise to appear again. Its primary purpose is to serve as a conduit of information to registrants of the upcom- ing foray and secondarily as a communications tool with members. Issues of Omphalina are archived in: Board Directors C s ta s Library and Archives Canada’s Electronic Collection http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/201/300/omphalina/index.html President Mycological Centre for Newfoundland Studies, Queen Elizabeth II Michael Burzynski Dave Malloch Library (printed copy also archived) Treasurer NB MUSEUM http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/search/collection/omphalina Geoff Th urlow Auditor Secretary Gordon Janes Th e content is neither discussed nor approved by the Robert McIsaac BONNELL COLE JANES Board of Directors. Th erefore, opinions expressed do Legal Counsel not represent the views of the Board, the Corporation, Directors the partners, the sponsors, or the members. Opinions Bill Bryden Andrew May are solely those of the authors and uncredited opinions Shawn Dawson BROTHERS & BURDEN solely those of the Editor. Rachelle Dove Webmaster Chris Deduke Jim Cornish Please address comments, complaints, and contributions Jamie Graham to the Editor, Sara Jenkins at [email protected] Anne Marceau Past President Helen Spencer Andrus Voitk Foray Newfoundland and Labrador is an Accepting C tr i s amateur, volunteer-run, community, not-for-profit We eagerly invite contributions to Omphalina, organization with a mission to organize enjoyable dealing with any aspect even remotely related to NL and informative amateur mushroom forays in mushrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of ​Physarum Polycephalum​Growth Rate On
    AP Research Comparison of Physarum Polycephalum Growth Rate on ​ ​ Various Nutrients Word count: 4,003 Comparison of Physarum Polycephalum Growth Rate on Various Nutrients ​ ​ Abstract The growth rate of Physarum Polycephalum (slime mold) was measured to determine ​ ​ what type of food results in the largest increase in surface area across a petri dish. Old fashioned oat flakes, the most commonly used nutrient for slime mold, was compared against 5 other food sources to determine if there is a food other than oat flakes that could yield a higher growth rate. The growth rates were measured with time lapse cameras over the course of three days. Over the duration of the recorded growth, it was concluded that the old fashioned oat flakes yielded the highest growth rate. Introduction Slime mold is a single celled protist that is visible to the naked eye. Slime mold is naturally found in the dark, moist climates that exist on decaying leaves and logs in forest areas. The protist consumes fungal spores, bacteria, and other microbes by means of engulfing (Dagamac 2015). To find its prey, slime mold is able to explore its environment “by spontaneous and self-organised oscillatory contractions” (Jones 2015). This means that the slime mold is able to contract its body in an organized way, allowing the slime mold to slowly push itself in all directions. When a slime mold encounters a new food source, it is able to connect the new food source to it’s pre existing ones. To conserve mass, the slime mold gradually funnels the link between the food sources to a single ‘protoplasmic’ tube.
    [Show full text]