7 Pages Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 1 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA2 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Direct Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate(7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each Condition is less than Condition is optimal and indicator is based on optimal, but sufficient to Minimal level of support of Condition is insufficient to fully supports what would be suitable maintain most wetland/surface water provide wetland/surface wetland/surface water for the type of wetland or wetland/surface functions water functions functions surface water assessed waterfunctions

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Surrounding landscape high quality; connected to NFSLR; downstream influence (hydrologic connectivity) not optimum due to spoil pile restrictions. Essentially zero human access.

w/o pres or current with 9 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Water levels appropriate, near optimum; water levels probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms. Upstream freshwater discharges and sediment loads could negatively affect water quality and quantity.

w/o pres or current with 9 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Majority of vegetation is appropriate and desireable: sawgrass, pond apple, leather fern, cabbage palm. Evidence 2. Benthic Community of land management for exotic species. Brazilian pepper is present; however. Variation in topography provides microhabitats (hummocky) .

w/o pres or current with 9 0

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 3.105 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.900 0.000

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.900 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

7 pages Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 1 of 35

PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study - Alternative 090107-1 AA3 1C FLUCCs code Further classification (optional) Impact or Mitigation Site? Assessment Area Size

615 - Stream and Lake Swamps Direct Impact 0.63

Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (Class) Special Classification (i.e.OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) North Fork St. Lucie River Savannas Preserve State Park (North Fork St. Lucie River Property)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland; immediately adjacent to river and Evans Creek.

Assessment area description Mature forest dominated by live oak, slash pine or cabbage palm, pond apple, Brazillian pepper swamp fern, leather fern, royal fern. hydrologically diverse with hummocks and depressions. Floodplain location and inundation varies with river/creek water depth and episodic rainfall events. Also tidally influenced. Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and/or adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Anticipated Wildlife Utilization Based on Literature Review (List of species Anticipated Utilization by Listed Species (List species, their legal that are representative of the assessment area and reasonably expected to classification (E, T, SSC), type of use, and intensity of use of the be found ) assessment area)

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, reptiles, small mammals

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, green heron nest (Evans Creek) wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 2 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA3 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Direct Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality; provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). w/o pres or current with 9 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands)

Water levels appropriate and vary seasonally; probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms.

w/o pres or current with 8 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural diversity; some 2. Benthic Community vegetation damaged, moderate exotics present.

w/o pres or current with 7 0

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.504 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.800 0.000

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.800 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 3 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study - Alternative 090107-1 AA6 1C FLUCCs code Further classification (optional) Impact or Mitigation Site? Assessment Area Size

641 - Freshwater Marshes Direct Impact 0.52

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Emergent marsh that appears to receive some stormwater runoff from US 1 or its right-of-way.

Assessment area description Emergent marsh (may have originally been a depression marsh) surrounded by a fringe of saw palmetto and pine flatwoods beyond; edge along US 1 has disturbed vegetation (recently cleared); edge dominated by wax myrtle, dahoon holly, red maple, buttonbush, and coastal plains willow, with an understory of swamp, cinnamon, and royal ferns. Center has St.John's-wort, maidencane, and dog fennel; areas of open water. Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, within Halpatiokee use Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area of Savannas Preserve State Park North Fork property.

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Water storage and attenuation; water quality improvement; wildlife cover; None wildlife reproduction; bird foraging

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); perhaps indigo snake, gopher frog, Florida pine reptiles, invertebrates, small mammals snake (gopher tortoise commensals), wood stork (E)

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

None observed in this AA; usually has high water levels.

Additional relevant factors:

Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 4 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA6 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Direct Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Surrounding habitats to the west are high quality (but immediately adjacent to US 1 corridor); marsh/pond probably important for wildlife reproduction; indirect downstream hydrologic connection to Hogpen Slough.

w/o pres or current with 7 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Water levels appropriate for current conditions but likely too high for the original depression marsh; vegetation appropriate and reflects appropriate current water levels. May have inflows from US1 swale.

w/o pres or current with 7 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

Relatively low diversity wetland (but adds diversity to surrounding landscape); somewhat overgrown due to fire suppression; only a few Brazilian pepper but abundant torpedo grass. Managed for exotics. Emergent marsh (may 1. Vegetation and/or have originally been a depression marsh) surrounded by a fringe of saw palmetto and pine flatwoods beyond; edge 2. Benthic Community along US 1 has disturbed vegetation (recently cleared); edge dominated by wax myrtle, dahoon holly, red maple, buttonbush, and coastal plains willow, with an understory of swamp, cinnamon, and royal ferns. Center has w/o pres or St.John's-wort, maidencane, and dog fennel; areas of open water. current with 8 0

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.382 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.733 0.000

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.733 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 5 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study - Alternative 090107-1 AA10 1C FLUCCs code Further classification (optional) Impact or Mitigation Site? Assessment Area Size

617 - Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Direct Impact 3.18

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and upland communities; immediately adjacent to Evans Creek and Hogpen Sough.

Assessment area description

Mature forest dominated by red maple, dahoon holly, live oak, slash pine or cabbage palm, pond apple, Brazillian pepper swamp fern, leather fern, royal fern. Hydrologically diverse with hummocks and depressions. Floodplain location and inundation varies with river/creek water depth

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, part of Halpatiokee Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, Florida brown snake reptiles, small mammals (state T), Eastern Indigo snake (T).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland; parcel purchased through CARL program.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 6 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA10 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Direct Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality;provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). US 1 to east. w/o pres or current with 8 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Swamp connected to Hogpen Slough which receives runoff from developed area and Savanas State Park. Water levels appropriate, some tidal influences.

w/o pres or current with 8 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural diversity; Managed for 2. Benthic Community exotics. Some exotic vegetation, primarily Brazilian pepper; high quality habitat with relatively high diversity, with herbaceous vegetation interspersed within the community.

w/o pres or current with 9 0

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 2.650 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.833 0.000

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.833 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 7 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study - Alternative 090107-1 AA2 1C FLUCCs code Further classification (optional) Impact or Mitigation Site? Assessment Area Size 6417 - Freshwater Marsh with Shrubs, Brush, and Secondary Impact 641 - Freshwater Marsh 3.28 Vines (0-50 Feet)

Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (Class) Special Classification (i.e.OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) North Fork St. Lucie River NA Savannas Preserve State Park (North Fork St. Lucie River Property)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Emergent marsh to the interior of mangrove fringe, stream and lake forest fringe, or live oak; interior "island" of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River or the North Coral Reef Waterway. Assessment area description Emergent marsh dominated by emergent vegetation: sawgrass with leather ferns, wax myrtle, pond apple, and occasional sabal palm. Other herbaceous species also present (duck potato, arrowhead, swamplily, bulrush, bacopa, vines). Community with numerous individuals and dense clumps of Brazilian pepper. Exotics appear to be more dense than first observed in 2003. Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Community part of and adjacent to state-owned lands (aquatic preserve or Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area state park lands); Savannas Preserve State Park North Fork Property.

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC,) possible mangrove rivulus (Federal candidate, reptiles, small mammals state SSC), wood stork (E), opossum pipefish (SSC).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

None observed in this AA

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

9 pages

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 8 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA2 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (0-50 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

w/o pres or current with 9 6

w/o pres or current with 9 9

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 9 6

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.656 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.900 0.700

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 9 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland; immediately adjacent to river and Evans Creek.

Wetland part of and/or adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, reptiles, small mammals

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, green heron nest (Evans Creek) wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 10 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA3 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (0-50 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands)

Water levels appropriate and vary seasonally; probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms.

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural diversity; some 2. Benthic Community vegetation damaged, moderate exotics present.

w/o pres or current with 7 4

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.122 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.800 0.600

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 11 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study - Alternative 090107-1 AA4 1C FLUCCs code Further classification (optional) Impact or Mitigation Site? Assessment Area Size Secondary Impact 615 - Stream and Lake Swamps 0.00 (0-50 Feet)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Immature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and disturbed upland communities; adjacent to residential and commercial land uses.

Assessment area description

Immature forest that may have been a sawgrass marsh; now dominated by widely scattered maple, dahoon holly, red bay, wax myrtle, willow, sawgrass, swamp fern, leather fern, royal fern; inundation varies with river/creek water depth and episodic rainfall e

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging, amphibians, reptiles, small Wading birds (SSC) and large mammals (white tailed deer)

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Black racer, racoon. Nearby residents report large mammal, possibly bobcat.

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland. Assessment area is a mix of 617 and transition from the pond apple/leatherfern/sawgrass habitat AA2. Essential Fish Habitat for white shrimp.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 1/7/2009 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 12 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA4 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (0-50 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 1/7/2009

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality; intense residential/commercial land uses to east; provides diversity for nearby upland habitat.

w/o pres or current with 7 4

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Water levels appropriate and vary seasonally; probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms. Some input from adjacent development with water management systems in place.

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Immature vegetation; may have been sawgrass marsh; high levels of exotics - Brazilian pepper and Lygodium; 2. Benthic Community exotics significantly increased since 2003 observations

w/o pres or current with 6 3

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.000 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.700 0.500

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 13 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and upland communities; immediately adjacent to Evans Creek and Hogpen Sough.

Assessment area description

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, part of Halpatiokee Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, Florida brown snake reptiles, small mammals (state T), Eastern Indigo snake (T).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland; parcel purchased through CARL program.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 14 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA10 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (0-50 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality;provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). US 1 to east. w/o pres or current with 8 5

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Swamp connected to Hogpen Slough which receives runoff from developed area and Savanas State Park. Water levels appropriate, some tidal influences.

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 9 6

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.594 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.833 0.633

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 15 of 35 Mitigation Determination Formulas - Alternative 1C (See Section 62-345.600(3), F.A.C.)

For each impact assessment area: (FL) Functional Loss = Impact Delta X Impact acres

For each mitigation assessment area: (RFG) Relative Functional Gain = Mitigation Delta (adjusted for preservation, if applicable)/((t-factor)(risk))

(a) Mitigation Bank Credit Determination

The total potential credits for a mitigation bank is the sum of the credits for each assessment area where assessment area credits equal the RFG times the acres of the assessment area scored

Bank Assessment Area RFG X Acres = Credits total

(b) Mitigation needed to offset impacts, when using a mitigation bank

The number of mitigation bank credits needed, when the bank or regional offsite mitigation area is assessed in accordance with this rule, is equal to the summation of the calculated functional loss for each impact assessment area.

Impact Assessment Credits Area FL = needed AA2 0.66 0.66 AA3 0.12 0.12 AA4 0.00 0.00 AA10 0.59 0.59 total 1.37 1.37

To determine the acres of mitigation needed to offset impacts when not using a bank or a regional offsite mitigation area as mitigation, divide functional loss (FL) by relative functional gain (RFG). If there are more than one impact assessment area or more than one mitigation assessment area, the total functional loss and total relative functional gain is determined by summation of the functional loss (FL) and relative functional gain (RFG) for each assessment area.

FL / RFG = Acres of Mitigation AA1 AA2 AA3 AA4 AA6 AA10 total

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 16 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (Class) Special Classification (i.e.OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) North Fork St. Lucie River NA Savannas Preserve State Park (North Fork St. Lucie River Property)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

None observed in this AA

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

9 pages Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 17 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA2 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (51-250 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate(7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each Condition is less than Condition is optimal and indicator is based on what optimal, but sufficient to Minimal level of support of Condition is insufficient to fully supports would be suitable for the maintain most wetland/surface water provide wetland/surface wetland/surface water type of wetland or surface wetland/surface functions water functions functions water assessed waterfunctions

w/o pres or current with 9 7

w/o pres or current with 9 9

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 9 9

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.66 with or w/o pres Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.900 0.833

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.067 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 18 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland; immediately adjacent to river and Evans Creek.

Wetland part of and/or adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, reptiles, small mammals

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, green heron nest (Evans Creek) wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 19 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA3 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (51-250 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands)

Water levels appropriate and vary seasonally; probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms.

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural diversity; some 2. Benthic Community vegetation damaged, moderate exotics present.

w/o pres or current with 7 7

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.069 with or w/o pres Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.800 0.767

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.033 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 20 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Immature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and disturbed upland communities; adjacent to residential and commercial land uses.

Assessment area description

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging, amphibians, reptiles, small Wading birds (SSC) and large mammals (white tailed deer)

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Black racer, racoon. Nearby residents report large mammal, possibly bobcat.

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland. Assessment area is a mix of 617 and transition from the pond apple/leatherfern/sawgrass habitat AA2. Essential Fish Habitat for white shrimp.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 1/7/2009 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 21 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality; intense residential/commercial land uses to east; provides diversity for nearby upland habitat.

w/o pres or current with 7 6

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 6 6

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.045 with or w/o pres Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.700 0.667

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.033 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 22 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and upland communities; immediately adjacent to Evans Creek and Hogpen Sough.

Assessment area description

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, part of Halpatiokee Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, Florida brown snake reptiles, small mammals (state T), Eastern Indigo snake (T).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland; parcel purchased through CARL program.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Howard, K. Stewart, C. 12/17/2008 Carter, A. Peterfreund

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 23 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA10 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Secondary Impact (51-250 Feet) Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Downstream landscape positions high quality;provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). US 1 to east. w/o pres or current with 8 7

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Swamp connected to Hogpen Slough which receives runoff from developed area and Savanas State Park. Water levels appropriate, some tidal influences.

w/o pres or current with 8 8

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 9 9

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.316 with or w/o pres Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.833 0.800

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.033 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 24 of 35 Mitigation Determination Formulas - Alternative 1C (See Section 62-345.600(3), F.A.C.)

For each impact assessment area: (FL) Functional Loss = Impact Delta X Impact acres

For each mitigation assessment area: (RFG) Relative Functional Gain = Mitigation Delta (adjusted for preservation, if applicable)/((t-factor)(risk))

(a) Mitigation Bank Credit Determination

The total potential credits for a mitigation bank is the sum of the credits for each assessment area where assessment area credits equal the RFG times the acres of the assessment area scored

Bank Assessment Area RFG X Acres = Credits total

(b) Mitigation needed to offset impacts, when using a mitigation bank

Impact Assessment Credits Area FL = needed AA2 0.66 0.66 AA3 0.07 0.07 AA4 0.05 0.05 AA10 0.32 0.32 total 1.09 1.09

FL / RFG = Acres of Mitigation AA1 AA2 AA3 AA6 AA10 total

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 25 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

615 - Stream and Lake Swamps Temporary Impacts 0.20

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland; immediately adjacent to river and Evans Creek.

Wetland part of and/or adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, reptiles, small mammals

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, green heron nest (Evans Creek) wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): A. Peterfreund 12/17/2008

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

5 pages

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 26 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA3 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Temporary Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same assessment area. Downstream landscape positions high quality; provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). w/o pres or current with 6 3

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same assessment area. Water levels appropriate and vary seasonally; probably adequate for invertebrates and benthic organisms.

w/o pres or current with 8 7

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same 2. Benthic Community assessment area. Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural diversity; some vegetation damaged, moderate exotics present.

w/o pres or current with 4 2

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.04 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.600 0.400

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 27 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

617 - Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Temporary Impacts 0.83

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and upland communities; immediately adjacent to Evans Creek and Hogpen Sough.

Assessment area description

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, part of Halpatiokee Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, Florida brown snake reptiles, small mammals (state T), Eastern Indigo snake (T).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland; parcel purchased through CARL program.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): A. Peterfreund 12/17/2008

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 28 of 35 PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA10 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Temporary Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same assessment area. Downstream landscape positions high quality;provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). US 1 to east. w/o pres or current with 5 2

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same assessment area. Swamp connected to Hogpen Slough which receives runoff from developed area and Savanas State Park. Water levels appropriate, some tidal influences.

w/o pres or current with 8 7

.500(6)(c)Community structure

Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same 1. Vegetation and/or assessment area. Diversity relatively high with combination of microhabitats; mature vegetation; high structural 2. Benthic Community diversity; Managed for exotics. Some exotic vegetation, primarily Brazilian pepper; high quality habitat with relatively high diversity, with herbaceous vegetation interspersed within the community. w/o pres or current with 6 3

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.19 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.633 0.400

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.233 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 29 of 35 Mitigation Determination Formulas - Alternative 1C (See Section 62-345.600(3), F.A.C.)

For each impact assessment area: (FL) Functional Loss = Impact Delta X Impact acres

For each mitigation assessment area: (RFG) Relative Functional Gain = Mitigation Delta (adjusted for preservation, if applicable)/((t-factor)(risk))

(a) Mitigation Bank Credit Determination

The total potential credits for a mitigation bank is the sum of the credits for each assessment area where assessment area credits equal the RFG times the acres of the assessment area scored

Bank Assessment Area RFG X Acres = Credits total

(b) Mitigation needed to offset impacts, when using a mitigation bank

Impact Assessment Credits Area FL = needed AA3 0.041 0.041 AA10 0.194 0.194 total 0.23 0.23

FL / RFG = Acres of Mitigation AA1 " AA2 AA3 AA6 AA10 total

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 30 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

615 - Stream and Lake Swamps Temporary Impacts 0.17

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland; immediately adjacent to river and Evans Creek.

Wetland part of and/or adjacent to state-owned lands Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, reptiles, small mammals

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, green heron nest (Evans Creek) wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): A. Peterfreund 11/3/2014

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

5 pages Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 31 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA3 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrott, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Temporary Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

w/o pres or current with 8 7

.500(6)(c)Community structure

w/o pres or current with 4 2

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.03 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.600 0.400

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.200 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 32 of 35 PART I – Qualitative Description (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.)

617 - Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Temporary Impacts 1.01

Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface water, uplands

Mature forested wetland between mangrove fringe and upland communities; immediately adjacent to Evans Creek and Hogpen Sough.

Assessment area description

Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional Significant nearby features landscape.)

Wetland part of and adjacent to state-owned lands, part of Halpatiokee Regionally important as state park in rapidly developing area area

Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use

Food chain support; water storage and attenuation; water quality None improvement; wildlife cover; bird nesting

Wading bird foraging, migratory bird foraging and nesting, amphibians, Wading birds (SSC); woodstork (E), bald eagle, Florida brown snake reptiles, small mammals (state T), Eastern Indigo snake (T).

Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings, nests, etc.):

Racoon tracks, blue jay, wading birds along river banks

Additional relevant factors:

FWS: Palustrine Forested Wetland; parcel purchased through CARL program.

Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): A. Peterfreund 11/3/2014

Form 62-345.900(1), F.A.C. [ effective date 02-04-2004 ]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 33 of 35

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Crosstown Parkway Extension PD&E Study 090107-1 AA10 Alternative 1C Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: M. Parrot, L. Herren, G. Lips, R. Miedema, B. Temporary Impact Howard, K. Stewart, C. Carter 12/17/2008

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Current number representative of With construction number on Secondary impacts from 0-50' for same assessment area. Downstream landscape positions high quality;provides diversity for nearby upland and riverine habitats; provides downstream benefits outside the AA; AA is large enough to provide high quality habitat for surrounding habitats (both natural and developed). US 1 to east. w/o pres or current with 5 2

w/o pres or current with 8 7

.500(6)(c)Community structure

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = 0.24 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.633 0.400

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.233 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date 02-04-2004]

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 34 of 35 Mitigation Determination Formulas - Alternative 1C (See Section 62-345.600(3), F.A.C.)

For each impact assessment area: (FL) Functional Loss = Impact Delta X Impact acres

For each mitigation assessment area: (RFG) Relative Functional Gain = Mitigation Delta (adjusted for preservation, if applicable)/((t-factor)(risk))

(a) Mitigation Bank Credit Determination

The total potential credits for a mitigation bank is the sum of the credits for each assessment area where assessment area credits equal the RFG times the acres of the assessment area scored

Bank Assessment Area RFG X Acres = Credits total

(b) Mitigation needed to offset impacts, when using a mitigation bank

Impact Assessment Credits Area FL = needed AA3 0.035 0.035 AA10 0.236 0.236 total 0.27 0.27

FL / RFG = Acres of Mitigation AA1 " AA2 AA3 AA6 AA10 total

Application No. 090107-1 Exhibit 3.2 Page 35 of 35