DOCSLIB.ORG

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake Arrowhead, California (San Bernardino County) Prepared for: LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 27307 CA-189 Blue Jay, California 92317 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 (949) 261-5414 November 2020 Blue Jay Well Site Project, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................... 5 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 5 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................ 5 1.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS........................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Responsible Agencies ..................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 2.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ........................................................................... 11 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: .............................................................. 11 2.2 DETERMINATION ........................................................................................................................ 11 SECTION 3.0 – EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.............................................................. 12 SECTION 4.0 – CHECKLIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ..................................................................... 14 4.1 AESTHETICS ................................................................................................................................. 14 4.1.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 14 4.2 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES .................................................................................... 17 4.2.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 18 4.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................ 19 4.3.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 19 4.3.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 20 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 29 4.4.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 29 4.4.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 33 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 36 4.5.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 37 4.5.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 37 4.6 ENERGY ....................................................................................................................................... 39 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................................................................. 40 4.7.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 41 4.7.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 41 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................................................................... 44 4.8.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 45 4.8.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 45 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.................................................................................... 48 4.9.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 48 Chambers Group, Inc. ii 21203 Blue Jay Well Site Project, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County, California 4.9.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 48 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................ 51 4.10.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 51 4.10.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 52 4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING ......................................................................................................... 55 4.11.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 55 4.11.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 55 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 55 4.12.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 56 4.12.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 56 4.13 NOISE .......................................................................................................................................... 57 4.13.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 57 4.13.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 57 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING ...................................................................................................... 62 4.14.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 62 4.14.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 63 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES......................................................................................................................... 63 4.15.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 63 4.15.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 64 4.16 RECREATION ............................................................................................................................... 65 4.16.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 66 4.16.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 66 4.17 TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................................................... 67 4.17.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 67 4.17.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 67 4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 69 4.18.1 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 69 4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 71 4.19.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 71 4.19.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. 71 4.20 WILDFIRE..................................................................................................................................... 73 4.20.1 Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resource Monitoring
    Appendix 4 4a. Cultural Resources Assessment 4b. Paleontological Technical Memorandum CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE LAKE GREGORY DAM REHABILITATION PROJECT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Jennifer Lancaster Aspen Environmental Group 5020 Chesebro Road, Suite 200, Agoura Hills, CA 91301 On behalf of: County of San Bernardino, Special Districts Department 157 W. 5th Street, 2nd Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0450 Authors: Dustin Keeler, Pam Daly, Tria Belcourt, Lynn Furnis, Ian Scharlotta and Sherri Gust Principal Investigator: Principal Architectural Historian: Tria Belcourt Pamela Daly Registered Professional Archaeologist October 2014 Revised June 2015 Project Number: 2861 Type of Study: Cultural Resources Assessment (Phase I) Sites: Lake Gregory Dam, LG2-001, 2861-1 (Apple Orchard Site) USGS Quadrangle: Silverwood Lake, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino North Survey Area: Dam: 28.08 acres Key Words: CEQA, EIR, Lake Gregory, Crestline, Lake Gregory Dam, LG2-001, 2861-1 (Apple Orchard Site) 1518 West Taft Avenue Field Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego • Riverside • Morro Bay • Oakland Toll free (888) 333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Federal Certifications 8(a), SDB, 8(m) WOSB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE Lake Gregory Dam Rehabilitation Project TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... IV PURPOSE OF STUDY ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IS-MND Blue Jay Well Site Project-Final
    INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake Arrowhead, California (San Bernardino County) Prepared for: LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 27307 CA-189 Blue Jay, California 92317 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 (949) 261-5414 November 2020 Blue Jay Well Site Project, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................... 5 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 5 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................ 5 1.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS........................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Responsible Agencies ..................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 2.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ........................................................................... 11 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cover
    VOLUME V /ISSUE 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2007 On the Enjoying A Presque Isle Winter ........ 4 Cover... Presque Isle Bay’s ice is Learning to Love Sailing ........................... 6 another way to love Erie winters like member Stan Zlotkowski “test flying” a Big Girls ..................................................... 8 new locally designed kite called a “YFO” just west of the Club in 2004. What’s An Entson? ................................. 10 Officers Commodore John Murosky........... 456-7797 Recapping the EYCRF Season ............... 18 [email protected] Vice Commodore Dave Arthurs.... 455-3935 [email protected] Basin On The Rise ................................... 22 R/C Dave Amatangelo .................. 452-0010 [email protected] Fleet Captain Tom Trost ............... 490-3363 Personal Watercraft Regulations ...................... 12 [email protected] When I Was A Kid ............................................... 16 Directors P/C James Means ............................... 833-4358 “131 Days To Summer” Party ........................... 20 [email protected] Bob McGee .................................. 838-6551 Yachtswomen of the Year ................................... 26 [email protected] Gerry Urbaniak ............................ 454-4456 Gail Garren Award ............................................. 28 [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS Bradley Enterline....................... 453-5004 [email protected] Sam “Rusty” Miller .................... 725-5331 [email protected] Greg Gorny
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federal Actions Will Affect and Be Affected by Implementation Ofthe Village Ofsag Harbor Local Waterftont Revitalization Program (L WRP)
    State and federal actions will affect and be affected by implementation ofthe Village ofSag Harbor Local WaterfTont Revitalization Program (L WRP). Under State law and the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act, certain State and federal actions \\~thin or affecting the local waterfront area must be "consistent" or "consistent to the maximum extent practicable" \"lith the enforceable policics and purposes ofthe LWRP. This consistency requirement makes the LWRP a unique. intergovernmental mechanism for sening policy and making decisions and helps to prevent detrimental actions from occurring and future options from being needlessly foreclosed. \Vhile consistency requirements primarily help prevent detrimental actions from occurring and help ensure that future options are not needlessly foreclosed, active participation of the part ofState and federal agencies is also likely to be necessary to implement specific provisions of the LViRP. The first pan ofthis section identifies the actions and programs ofState and federal agencies which should be undertaken in a manner consistent with the LWRP. This is a generic list of actions and programs, as identified by the New York State Department ofState; therefore, some of the actions and programs listed may not be relevant to this LWRP. Pursuant to the State Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42). the Secretary ofState individually and separately notifies affected State agencies ofthose agency actions and programs which are to be undertaken in a manner consistent with approved LWRPs. Similarly, federal agenc), actions and programs subject to consistency requirements are identified in the manner prescribed by the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act and its implementing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Seed Dispersal Mutualisms Amplify Restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea Dentata)? [Year 2]
    A Title: Reseeding restored forests: Can seed dispersal mutualisms amplify restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea dentata)? [Year 2] James R. Wright Collaborator: Leila Pinchot Faculty supervisors: Christopher M. Tonra and Stephen N. Matthews B SUMMARY (100 words) Seed dispersal is a fundamental mutualism between wildlife and trees. Wildlife, such as birds, often cache abundant seed from trees to enable them to survive the winter, and unrecovered seed ensures dispersal and persistence of tree species. Rapid environmental change can disrupt this critical process, potentially threatening the persistence of the ecosystem. Both the loss of American chestnut and the declines in Oak- Hickory forest represent historic and contemporary perturbations to plant-animal interactions. Understanding the capacity of Blue Jays, a prolific seed disperser, to facilitate chestnut and oak dispersal, and their seed preferences, is an important piece to sustaining these forests. C Principal Investigators and Institutional Affiliations James Wright: PhD student, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Cornelia (Leila) Pinchot: Research Ecologist, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Christopher Tonra: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Stephen Matthews: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State D Duration of Project Three years of research (2018-2020). This proposal resubmission is a funding request for Year 2. E Total amount requested We are requesting $8,080 to support a research technician and supplies to tag Blue Jays and Chestnuts. We recently received additional funding of $49,000 to support a graduate student and field supplies to focus on relationships between Jays and Oaks, and the proposed research here will allow us to continue the novel Chestnut component.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorville OTSP
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ............................................. 1.0-1 1.2 Technical Studies .......................................................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.3 Abbreviations Used ...................................................................................................................... 1.0-2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location and Setting ..................................................................................................... 2.0-1 2.2 Project Background and History ................................................................................................ 2.0-1 2.3 Project Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 2.0-2 2.4 Project Characteristics................................................................................................................. 2.0-4 2.5 Construction and Phasing .......................................................................................................... 2.0-8 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 3.0-1 3.2. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................................ 3.0-3 3.3 Determination ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May/June 2019 Issue
    May/June 2019 ENCINAL YACHT CLUB SOUNDINGS What’s Inside! -VP Report -Commodore’s Report -Junior Sailing -House Report -Pool Info -VC Report/J22 Charter -GM Report -SB Cruise Out -Summer Hours 2019 Master Mariners Kentucky Derby Party 1 EYC Management 2018-2019 Board of Directors Encinal Yacht Club President Charlie Thome Established 1890 FromSr. Vice EYC President Vice PresidentFred Rutledge 1251 Pacific Marina Vice President Rodney Pimentel Alameda, CA 94501 Treasurer Mike Gorman Office (510) 522-3272 FredCommodore Rutledge Theo Rohr Vice Commodore Ted Floyd www.encinal.org Rear Commodore Jens Jensen Director Michael Andrews Policies Director Cindy Wondolleck Soundings will be published bimonthly. Submissions Director Michelle Shaffer will be handled with reasonable care, but no liability is Director Anna Christensen assumed for them. All articles are subject to editing for Committee Chair Persons content and space consideration. Permissions: Material in this publication may not be Membership Mark Sneddon reproduced in any form without permission directed to Marketing Meg Sneddon the Editor. Finance Rick Webb Deadline: Articles and photographs are due by the Boat Yard Theo Rohr 20th of the month prior to publication. Late submissions Building & Grounds Tim Eaker cannot be assured of publication. Articles may be House Stacy Paluch dropped off or faxed to the Club, or emailed to the Youth Grace Hess soundings Editor Cindy Wondolleck at soundings@ Junior Sailing Barb Grove encinal.org Long Range Planning Jim Vickers Nominating Mike Scheck Gardening David Weidner Staff General Manager/COO Curtis Lew Appointed Officers Member Service Coordinator Omta Toma Controller Lori Bateman Port Captain Kim Arrivee Executive Chefs Geo Rodriguez Cruise Captain Ed Lecco Manny Rodriguez Small Boat Fleet Captain John Hansen Junior Sailing Director Mike Scott Power Boat Fleet Captain Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Village of Morristown LWRP
    '-..r. - ,'l) . \( • Town of Morristown and Village of Morristown Local Waterfront Revitalization Program , u US Department ofCom1nerce NOAA Coastal Serrvk0s Center Library 2234 South Ho!hGn>n Avenue Charleston, SC 29405·2413 Adopted: Town of Morristown Town Board, November 13, 1990 Village of Morristown Board of Trustees, November 7, 1990 Approved: NYS Secretary of State Gail S. Shaffer, April 25, 1991 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, July 29, 1991 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program has been adopted and approved in accordance with the provisions of the Waterfront . Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing regulations • (6 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation ofthis Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State . Coastal Management Program as a Routine Program Implementation has been obtained in accordance with the provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068. The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department ofState, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, 162 Washington Avenue, New York 12231. • US Department of Commerce NOAA Coastal Services Center Lf1t::,:,-_­ 2234 South Eo!ho:s>:Jl.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 One Design Classes and Sailor Survey
    2019 One Design Classes and Sailor Survey [email protected] One Design Classes and Sailor Survey One Design sailing is a critical and fundamental part of our sport. In late October 2019, US Sailing put together a survey for One Design class associations and sailors to see how we can better serve this important constituency. The survey was sent via email, as a link placed on our website and through other USSA Social media channels. The survey was sent to our US Sailing members, class associations and organizations, and made available to any constituent that noted One-Design sailing in their profile. Some interesting observations: • Answers are based on respondents’ perception of or actual experience with US Sailing. • 623 unique comments were received from survey respondents and grouped into “Response Types” for sorting purposes • When reviewing data, please note that “OTHER” Comments are as equally important as those called out in a specific area, like Insurance, Administration, etc. • The majority of respondents are currently or have been members of US Sailing for more than 5 years, and many sail in multiple One-Design classes • About 1/5 of the OD respondents serve(d) as an officer of their primary OD class; 80% were owner/drivers of their primary OD class; and more than 60% were members of their primary OD class association. • Respondents to the survey were most highly concentrated on the East and West coasts, followed by the Mid- West and Texas – though we did have representation from 42 states, plus Puerto Rico and Canada. • Most respondents were male.
    [Show full text]
  • Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC
    Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC For Handicap Range Code 0-1 2-3 4 5-9 14 (Int.) 14 85.3 86.9 85.4 84.2 84.1 29er 29 84.5 (85.8) 84.7 83.9 (78.9) 405 (Int.) 405 89.9 (89.2) 420 (Int. or Club) 420 97.6 103.4 100.0 95.0 90.8 470 (Int.) 470 86.3 91.4 88.4 85.0 82.1 49er (Int.) 49 68.2 69.6 505 (Int.) 505 79.8 82.1 80.9 79.6 78.0 A Scow A-SC 61.3 [63.2] 62.0 [56.0] Akroyd AKR 99.3 (97.7) 99.4 [102.8] Albacore (15') ALBA 90.3 94.5 92.5 88.7 85.8 Alpha ALPH 110.4 (105.5) 110.3 110.3 Alpha One ALPHO 89.5 90.3 90.0 [90.5] Alpha Pro ALPRO (97.3) (98.3) American 14.6 AM-146 96.1 96.5 American 16 AM-16 103.6 (110.2) 105.0 American 18 AM-18 [102.0] Apollo C/B (15'9") APOL 92.4 96.6 94.4 (90.0) (89.1) Aqua Finn AQFN 106.3 106.4 Arrow 15 ARO15 (96.7) (96.4) B14 B14 (81.0) (83.9) Bandit (Canadian) BNDT 98.2 (100.2) Bandit 15 BND15 97.9 100.7 98.8 96.7 [96.7] Bandit 17 BND17 (97.0) [101.6] (99.5) Banshee BNSH 93.7 95.9 94.5 92.5 [90.6] Barnegat 17 BG-17 100.3 100.9 Barnegat Bay Sneakbox B16F 110.6 110.5 [107.4] Barracuda BAR (102.0) (100.0) Beetle Cat (12'4", Cat Rig) BEE-C 120.6 (121.7) 119.5 118.8 Blue Jay BJ 108.6 110.1 109.5 107.2 (106.7) Bombardier 4.8 BOM4.8 94.9 [97.1] 96.1 Bonito BNTO 122.3 (128.5) (122.5) Boss w/spi BOS 74.5 75.1 Buccaneer 18' spi (SWN18) BCN 86.9 89.2 87.0 86.3 85.4 Butterfly BUT 108.3 110.1 109.4 106.9 106.7 Buzz BUZ 80.5 81.4 Byte BYTE 97.4 97.7 97.4 96.3 [95.3] Byte CII BYTE2 (91.4) [91.7] [91.6] [90.4] [89.6] C Scow C-SC 79.1 81.4 80.1 78.1 77.6 Canoe (Int.) I-CAN 79.1 [81.6] 79.4 (79.0) Canoe 4 Mtr 4-CAN 121.0 121.6
    [Show full text]
  • Hashmi Quazi, Phd, PE, GE Principal in Charge/Project Manager
    Hashmi Quazi, PhD, PE, GE Principal in Charge/Project Manager Dr. Quazi has 31 years of experience providing geotechnical engineering services and has earned a reputation for providing quality work in an honest and ethical manner, on time and within budget. In his capacity as Principal in Charge or Project Manager, Dr. Quazi provides quality control, budget oversight, and technical assistance on various types of projects, including pipelines, wastewater treatment plants, reservoirs, and other related studies. He has supervised site investigations and prepared technical reports for facilities located in areas of high liquefaction potential and difficult subsurface conditions. Dr. Quazi is also responsible for the operation and management of our offices in Redlands, Monrovia, Costa EDUCATION Mesa, Palm Desert and Palmdale. Ph.D., Civil Engineering, University of Arizona, 1987 . M.S., Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1982 Relevant Experience . B.S., Bangladesh Engineering University, 1978 Pipelines REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS La Sierra Pipeline (WMWD), Riverside County, CA. Principal . California, Civil Engineer, #46651 in Charge. Provides technical oversight and budget control for . California, Geotechnical Engineer, the geotechnical investigation report. The project consisted of #2517 approximately 21,000 linear feet of 24-inch diameter water pipeline, installed along La Sierra Avenue and the Riverside PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS County Flood Control Arlington Channel, Arizona Channel, . American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and Line C-1 Channel. The alignment was located in the City . American Water Works Association of Riverside and the adjacent unincorporated portion of (AWWA) Riverside County, California. American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) Simpson Road Sewer Pipeline Repair (EMWD), Menifee, CA. Principal in Charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book
    Learn about . A Learning and Activity Book Color your own guide to the birds that wing their way across the plains, hills, forests, deserts and mountains of Texas. Text Mark W. Lockwood Conservation Biologist, Natural Resource Program Editorial Direction Georg Zappler Art Director Elena T. Ivy Educational Consultants Juliann Pool Beverly Morrell © 1997 Texas Parks and Wildlife 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 PWD BK P4000-038 10/97 All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Another "Learn about Texas" publication from TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE PRESS ISBN- 1-885696-17-5 Key to the Cover 4 8 1 2 5 9 3 6 7 14 16 10 13 20 19 15 11 12 17 18 19 21 24 23 20 22 26 28 31 25 29 27 30 ©TPWPress 1997 1 Great Kiskadee 16 Blue Jay 2 Carolina Wren 17 Pyrrhuloxia 3 Carolina Chickadee 18 Pyrrhuloxia 4 Altamira Oriole 19 Northern Cardinal 5 Black-capped Vireo 20 Ovenbird 6 Black-capped Vireo 21 Brown Thrasher 7Tufted Titmouse 22 Belted Kingfisher 8 Painted Bunting 23 Belted Kingfisher 9 Indigo Bunting 24 Scissor-tailed Flycatcher 10 Green Jay 25 Wood Thrush 11 Green Kingfisher 26 Ruddy Turnstone 12 Green Kingfisher 27 Long-billed Thrasher 13 Vermillion Flycatcher 28 Killdeer 14 Vermillion Flycatcher 29 Olive Sparrow 15 Blue Jay 30 Olive Sparrow 31 Great Horned Owl =female =male Texas Birds More kinds of birds have been found in Texas than any other state in the United States: just over 600 species.
    [Show full text]