DOCSLIB.ORG

Modernizing Georgia's Transportation System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modernizing Georgia's Transportation System Modernizing Georgia’s Transportation System: Progress and Challenges in Providing Safe, Efficient and Well-Maintained Roads, Highways and Bridges Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Modernizing Georgia’s Transportation System Executive Summary Three years ago, faced with inadequate investment in the state’s transportation system to support a growing population and quality of life, the Georgia legislature approved a long-term increase in transportation funding. The 2015 Transportation Funding Act (TFA) provided a significant boost in transportation funding in Georgia, allowing the state to address many of its critical transportation challenges. Approval of the TFA has allowed the state to increase its investment in road, highway and bridge repairs and roadway safety improvements. It has also enabled the acceleration of numerous highway improvements, including the Major Mobility Investment Program, to relieve traffic congestion and support economic development opportunities in the Peach State. With an economy based largely on agriculture, manufacturing, industry and tourism, and with Atlanta serving as the chief distributor of goods and the communications and transportation center for the Southeast, the quality of Georgia’s transportation system plays a vital role in the state’s economic growth and quality of life. An efficient, safe and well-maintained transportation system provides economic and social benefits by affording individuals access to employment, housing, healthcare, education, goods and services, recreation, entertainment, family, and social activities. It also provides businesses access to suppliers, markets and employees, all critical to a business’ level of productivity and ability to expand. Reduced accessibility and mobility - as a result of traffic congestion, a lack of adequate capacity, or deteriorated roads, highways, bridges and transit facilities - diminishes a region’s quality of life by reducing economic productivity and limiting opportunities for economic, health or social transactions and activities. While approval of the TFA greatly improves Georgia’s ability to fund needed roadway repairs and improvements, with Georgia’s population anticipated to increase by 2.5 million people over the next two decades, the state will continue to face transportation challenges. From continuing to maintain its aging transportation system to further improving roadway safety and making additional transportation improvements to serve the future needs of its growing economy, Georgia will need additional increases in reliable transportation funding from local, state and federal governments. Achieving the state’s goals for a modern, well-maintained and safe transportation system will require staying the course with Georgia’s current transportation program and achieving additional increases in transportation investment. Modernizing Georgia’s Transportation System 2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AND NEEDED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS Transportation funding provided by the 2015 Transportation Funding Act will allow for the completion of numerous projects throughout the state to improve road and bridge conditions, relieve traffic congestion, and improve traffic safety. While the additional transportation funding will allow dozens of needed projects to proceed, many other transportation projects still lack adequate funding. • The 2015 Transportation Funding Act (HB 170) replaced the existing gasoline tax with an excise tax of 26 cents per gallon on gasoline and 29 cents on diesel (which will be indexed on the Consumer Price Index and Georgia CAFE Standards), added a $200 fee on personal electric vehicles and a $300 fee for commercial electric vehicles, instated a $5 per night hotel room tax, and included a heavy truck impact fee of between $50 and $100 depending on the weight of the vehicle. • The legislation is expected to provide an additional $5.4 billion for transportation from 2016 to 2021, an average of approximately $900 million per year. • The chart below details anticipated additional funds that will be made available each year through 2021 due to the passage of the TFA. Additional Funds Available Due To 2015 Transportation Funding Act 2016 $ 765,114,468 2017 $ 845,629,709 2018 $ 909,160,509 2019 $ 933,198,709 2020 $ 958,896,609 2021 $ 984,938,609 • Proceeds from the TFA will allow for increased funding for maintenance, preservation, reconstruction, capacity expansion and local projects. The chart below details recent and projected expenditures by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) for maintenance, preservation, reconstruction, highway and bridge capacity expansion, and local projects from 2015 through 2021. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Maintenance $ 229,307,807 $ 439,212,982 $ 435,507,607 $ 457,707,607 $ 407,807,607 $ 407,807,607 $ 409,557,607 Preservation $ 149,498,149 $ 540,428,310 $ 402,757,327 $ 435,000,000 $ 445,000,000 $ 351,000,000 $ 384,533,496 Reconstruction $ 386,008,730 $ 596,765,332 $ 768,475,712 $ 769,970,171 $ 680,834,971 $ 877,955,322 $ 537,497,117 Highway & Bridge Capacity $ 806,645,330 $ 969,440,861 $ 871,036,192 $ 950,181,206 $ 1,065,279,411 $ 1,399,129,477 $ 1,129,079,630 Local Projects $ 228,870,489 $ 258,202,963 $ 287,306,796 $ 305,015,382 $ 257,215,147 $ 310,125,453 $ 213,073,980 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,800,330,506 $ 2,804,050,449 $ 2,765,083,635 $ 2,917,874,367 $ 2,856,137,135 $ 3,346,017,859 $ 2,673,741,830 HB 170 REVENUE N/A $ 765,114,468 $ 845,629,709 $ 909,160,509 $ 933,198,709 $ 958,896,609 $ 984,938,609 • The charts below detail transportation projects in the state’s largest urban areas and statewide that will be underway by 2021, partially as a result of increased transportation funding. Modernizing Georgia’s Transportation System 3 Project Description County/Counties Improvement Year Cost Benefit of Project Atlanta Urban Area I-20 FROM COLUMBIA DR TO PANOLA RD - MOVABLE BARRIERS DeKalb Barriers 2020 $18.4M Congestion Relief I-75 NB CD SYSTEM FROM SR 331 TO I-285 Clayton Ramp 2018 $41.8M Congestion Relief SR 3/US 19/US 41 FROM S OF TARA RD TO S OF SR 54 Clayton Widening 2019 $30.4M Congestion Relief WEST WINDER BYP-CR 325/MATTHEWS SCHL RD TO SR 211- PH I Barrow Widening 2018 $38.3M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 316 @ SR 81, @ SR 11, & @ SR 53 Barrow Interchanges (3) 2018 $47.0M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 20-SHARON CHURCH RD TO BRAND RD; 3 INTERSECTIONS Gwinnett, Walton Widening 2020-21 $47.6M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 92-SR 3/US 41 TO GLADE RD Cobb Widening 2019 $31.8M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 9-WINDWARD PKWY TO FORSYTH CO LINE Fulton Widening 2021 $31.5M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 9-FULTON CO LINE TO SR 141 Forsyth Widening 2021 $55.8M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 20- I-575 TO NORTH CORNERS PKWY Cherokee, Forsyth Widening 2019-21 $91.0M Congestion Relief, Safety MLK JR DRIVE @ RICH'S PARKING LOT IN ATLANTA Fulton Bridges 2019 $44.0M Replace Outdated Bridge I-75-CHATTAHOOCHEE RVR TO ALLGOOD ROAD Cobb Resurfacing & Maintenance 2018 $32.0M Preservation I-20 FROM SR 5 TO SWEETWATER CREEK Douglas Resurfacing & Maintenance 2019 $31.7M Preservation Augusta Urban Area I-20 @ SAVANNAH RIVER Richmond Bridges 2019 $72.2M Congestion Relief, Safety SR 10-FORT GORDON NEW ACP/GATE 6 TO SR 223 Richmond Widening 2018 $16.2M Congestion Relief, Military Access SR 4/US 25BU-SAVANNAH RIVER AT SC STATE LINE Richmond Bridges 2021 $16.2M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 388- I-20 TO SR 232 Columbia Widening 2019 $8.1M Congestion Relief SR 4 -MILLEDGEVILLE RD TO GOVERNMENT ST Richmond Widening 2020 $5.0M Congestion Relief Columbus Urban Area SR 219 -SCHLEY CREEK NW OF COLUMBUS Muscogee Bridges 2020 $2.2M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 520/US 280 EB & WB - BAGLEY CREEK 2 MI SE OF CUSSETA Chattahoochee Bridges 2020 $2.3M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 85/US 27 ALT SB & NB - CR 1660/MILLER RD IN COLUMBUS Muscogee Bridges 2021 $4.8M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 22/US 80 - KENDALL CREEK IN COLUMBUS Muscogee Bridges 2020 $1.7M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 22/US 80 - FLATROCK CREEK IN COLUMBUS Muscogee Bridges 2021 $3.0M Replace Outdated Bridge Macon Urban Area I-16 EB FROM I-75 TO WALNUT CREEK - PHASE IV Bibb Bridges 2021 $128.7M Bottleneck Relief; Congestion Relief I-16 WB FROM I-75 TO WALNUT CREEK - PHASE V Bibb Bridges 2021 $97.2M Bottleneck Relief; Congestion Relief I-16 EB & WB - OCMULGEE RIVER OVERFLOW Bibb Bridges 2021 $10.8M Bottleneck Relief; Congestion Relief SR 11/SR 49 -ROCKY CRK & TOBESOFKEE CRK &OVFLW Bibb Bridges 2019 $16.3M Replace Outdated Bridge SR 11/SR 49/US 41 - 1.4 MI S OF MACON Bibb Bridges 2020 $3.8M Econ. Dev. Savannah Urban Area I-16 FROM I-95 TO I-516 Chatham Widening 2018-21 $130.2M Bottleneck & Congestion Relief I-16 - I-95 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION Chatham Interchange 2018-21 $125.4M Bottleneck & Congestion Relief CR 787/ISLANDS EXPWY - WILMINGTON RVR/BASCULE BRIDGE Chatham Bridges 2018 $56.0M Replace Outdated Bridges JIMMY DELOACH PXWY EXT - I-16 TO SR 26/US 80 Chatham New location roadway 2018 $26.3M Freight Bottleneck & Congestion Relief BRAMPTON RD FROM SR 21/SR 25 TO SR 21 SPUR Chatham New location roadway 2019 $43.3M Freight Bottleneck & Congestion Relief Other Areas in Georgia MCCAYSVILLE BYPASS FROM SR 5 TO TN STATE LINE Fannin New location roadway 2020 $31.3M Congestion relief; Econ. Dev. SR 5 - SR 2/BLUE RIDGE N TO PROP MCCAYSVILLE BYP NR CR 138 Fannin Widening 2020 $61.0M Congestion relief; Econ. Dev. SR 133 - S OF SR 35/US 319 TO N OF CR540 HOLLY DR Colquitt, Worth, Dougherty Widening 2019-20 $185.7M Econ.Dev.; Freight corridor SR 24/US 441 - PUTNAM CO LN TO N OF CS 646/PIERCE DAIRY RD Morgan Widening 2021 $32.6M Econ.Dev.; Freight corridor SR 4/US 1- N OF WILLIAMS CK TO GREEN OAK RD Toombs Widening 2020-21 $145.4M Econ.Dev.; Freight corridor SE ROME BYP - SR 101 NE ON NEW LOC TO US 411 Floyd Roadway Project 2019 $61.9M Congestion relief; Econ.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IS-MND Blue Jay Well Site Project-Final
    INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake Arrowhead, California (San Bernardino County) Prepared for: LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 27307 CA-189 Blue Jay, California 92317 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 (949) 261-5414 November 2020 Blue Jay Well Site Project, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................... 5 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 5 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................ 5 1.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS........................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Responsible Agencies ..................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 2.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ........................................................................... 11 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cover
    VOLUME V /ISSUE 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2007 On the Enjoying A Presque Isle Winter ........ 4 Cover... Presque Isle Bay’s ice is Learning to Love Sailing ........................... 6 another way to love Erie winters like member Stan Zlotkowski “test flying” a Big Girls ..................................................... 8 new locally designed kite called a “YFO” just west of the Club in 2004. What’s An Entson? ................................. 10 Officers Commodore John Murosky........... 456-7797 Recapping the EYCRF Season ............... 18 [email protected] Vice Commodore Dave Arthurs.... 455-3935 [email protected] Basin On The Rise ................................... 22 R/C Dave Amatangelo .................. 452-0010 [email protected] Fleet Captain Tom Trost ............... 490-3363 Personal Watercraft Regulations ...................... 12 [email protected] When I Was A Kid ............................................... 16 Directors P/C James Means ............................... 833-4358 “131 Days To Summer” Party ........................... 20 [email protected] Bob McGee .................................. 838-6551 Yachtswomen of the Year ................................... 26 [email protected] Gerry Urbaniak ............................ 454-4456 Gail Garren Award ............................................. 28 [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS Bradley Enterline....................... 453-5004 [email protected] Sam “Rusty” Miller .................... 725-5331 [email protected] Greg Gorny
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federal Actions Will Affect and Be Affected by Implementation Ofthe Village Ofsag Harbor Local Waterftont Revitalization Program (L WRP)
    State and federal actions will affect and be affected by implementation ofthe Village ofSag Harbor Local WaterfTont Revitalization Program (L WRP). Under State law and the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act, certain State and federal actions \\~thin or affecting the local waterfront area must be "consistent" or "consistent to the maximum extent practicable" \"lith the enforceable policics and purposes ofthe LWRP. This consistency requirement makes the LWRP a unique. intergovernmental mechanism for sening policy and making decisions and helps to prevent detrimental actions from occurring and future options from being needlessly foreclosed. \Vhile consistency requirements primarily help prevent detrimental actions from occurring and help ensure that future options are not needlessly foreclosed, active participation of the part ofState and federal agencies is also likely to be necessary to implement specific provisions of the LViRP. The first pan ofthis section identifies the actions and programs ofState and federal agencies which should be undertaken in a manner consistent with the LWRP. This is a generic list of actions and programs, as identified by the New York State Department ofState; therefore, some of the actions and programs listed may not be relevant to this LWRP. Pursuant to the State Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42). the Secretary ofState individually and separately notifies affected State agencies ofthose agency actions and programs which are to be undertaken in a manner consistent with approved LWRPs. Similarly, federal agenc), actions and programs subject to consistency requirements are identified in the manner prescribed by the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act and its implementing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Seed Dispersal Mutualisms Amplify Restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea Dentata)? [Year 2]
    A Title: Reseeding restored forests: Can seed dispersal mutualisms amplify restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea dentata)? [Year 2] James R. Wright Collaborator: Leila Pinchot Faculty supervisors: Christopher M. Tonra and Stephen N. Matthews B SUMMARY (100 words) Seed dispersal is a fundamental mutualism between wildlife and trees. Wildlife, such as birds, often cache abundant seed from trees to enable them to survive the winter, and unrecovered seed ensures dispersal and persistence of tree species. Rapid environmental change can disrupt this critical process, potentially threatening the persistence of the ecosystem. Both the loss of American chestnut and the declines in Oak- Hickory forest represent historic and contemporary perturbations to plant-animal interactions. Understanding the capacity of Blue Jays, a prolific seed disperser, to facilitate chestnut and oak dispersal, and their seed preferences, is an important piece to sustaining these forests. C Principal Investigators and Institutional Affiliations James Wright: PhD student, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Cornelia (Leila) Pinchot: Research Ecologist, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Christopher Tonra: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Stephen Matthews: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State D Duration of Project Three years of research (2018-2020). This proposal resubmission is a funding request for Year 2. E Total amount requested We are requesting $8,080 to support a research technician and supplies to tag Blue Jays and Chestnuts. We recently received additional funding of $49,000 to support a graduate student and field supplies to focus on relationships between Jays and Oaks, and the proposed research here will allow us to continue the novel Chestnut component.
    [Show full text]
  • May/June 2019 Issue
    May/June 2019 ENCINAL YACHT CLUB SOUNDINGS What’s Inside! -VP Report -Commodore’s Report -Junior Sailing -House Report -Pool Info -VC Report/J22 Charter -GM Report -SB Cruise Out -Summer Hours 2019 Master Mariners Kentucky Derby Party 1 EYC Management 2018-2019 Board of Directors Encinal Yacht Club President Charlie Thome Established 1890 FromSr. Vice EYC President Vice PresidentFred Rutledge 1251 Pacific Marina Vice President Rodney Pimentel Alameda, CA 94501 Treasurer Mike Gorman Office (510) 522-3272 FredCommodore Rutledge Theo Rohr Vice Commodore Ted Floyd www.encinal.org Rear Commodore Jens Jensen Director Michael Andrews Policies Director Cindy Wondolleck Soundings will be published bimonthly. Submissions Director Michelle Shaffer will be handled with reasonable care, but no liability is Director Anna Christensen assumed for them. All articles are subject to editing for Committee Chair Persons content and space consideration. Permissions: Material in this publication may not be Membership Mark Sneddon reproduced in any form without permission directed to Marketing Meg Sneddon the Editor. Finance Rick Webb Deadline: Articles and photographs are due by the Boat Yard Theo Rohr 20th of the month prior to publication. Late submissions Building & Grounds Tim Eaker cannot be assured of publication. Articles may be House Stacy Paluch dropped off or faxed to the Club, or emailed to the Youth Grace Hess soundings Editor Cindy Wondolleck at soundings@ Junior Sailing Barb Grove encinal.org Long Range Planning Jim Vickers Nominating Mike Scheck Gardening David Weidner Staff General Manager/COO Curtis Lew Appointed Officers Member Service Coordinator Omta Toma Controller Lori Bateman Port Captain Kim Arrivee Executive Chefs Geo Rodriguez Cruise Captain Ed Lecco Manny Rodriguez Small Boat Fleet Captain John Hansen Junior Sailing Director Mike Scott Power Boat Fleet Captain Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Village of Morristown LWRP
    '-..r. - ,'l) . \( • Town of Morristown and Village of Morristown Local Waterfront Revitalization Program , u US Department ofCom1nerce NOAA Coastal Serrvk0s Center Library 2234 South Ho!hGn>n Avenue Charleston, SC 29405·2413 Adopted: Town of Morristown Town Board, November 13, 1990 Village of Morristown Board of Trustees, November 7, 1990 Approved: NYS Secretary of State Gail S. Shaffer, April 25, 1991 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, July 29, 1991 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program has been adopted and approved in accordance with the provisions of the Waterfront . Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing regulations • (6 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation ofthis Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State . Coastal Management Program as a Routine Program Implementation has been obtained in accordance with the provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068. The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department ofState, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, 162 Washington Avenue, New York 12231. • US Department of Commerce NOAA Coastal Services Center Lf1t::,:,-_­ 2234 South Eo!ho:s>:Jl.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 One Design Classes and Sailor Survey
    2019 One Design Classes and Sailor Survey [email protected] One Design Classes and Sailor Survey One Design sailing is a critical and fundamental part of our sport. In late October 2019, US Sailing put together a survey for One Design class associations and sailors to see how we can better serve this important constituency. The survey was sent via email, as a link placed on our website and through other USSA Social media channels. The survey was sent to our US Sailing members, class associations and organizations, and made available to any constituent that noted One-Design sailing in their profile. Some interesting observations: • Answers are based on respondents’ perception of or actual experience with US Sailing. • 623 unique comments were received from survey respondents and grouped into “Response Types” for sorting purposes • When reviewing data, please note that “OTHER” Comments are as equally important as those called out in a specific area, like Insurance, Administration, etc. • The majority of respondents are currently or have been members of US Sailing for more than 5 years, and many sail in multiple One-Design classes • About 1/5 of the OD respondents serve(d) as an officer of their primary OD class; 80% were owner/drivers of their primary OD class; and more than 60% were members of their primary OD class association. • Respondents to the survey were most highly concentrated on the East and West coasts, followed by the Mid- West and Texas – though we did have representation from 42 states, plus Puerto Rico and Canada. • Most respondents were male.
    [Show full text]
  • Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC
    Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC For Handicap Range Code 0-1 2-3 4 5-9 14 (Int.) 14 85.3 86.9 85.4 84.2 84.1 29er 29 84.5 (85.8) 84.7 83.9 (78.9) 405 (Int.) 405 89.9 (89.2) 420 (Int. or Club) 420 97.6 103.4 100.0 95.0 90.8 470 (Int.) 470 86.3 91.4 88.4 85.0 82.1 49er (Int.) 49 68.2 69.6 505 (Int.) 505 79.8 82.1 80.9 79.6 78.0 A Scow A-SC 61.3 [63.2] 62.0 [56.0] Akroyd AKR 99.3 (97.7) 99.4 [102.8] Albacore (15') ALBA 90.3 94.5 92.5 88.7 85.8 Alpha ALPH 110.4 (105.5) 110.3 110.3 Alpha One ALPHO 89.5 90.3 90.0 [90.5] Alpha Pro ALPRO (97.3) (98.3) American 14.6 AM-146 96.1 96.5 American 16 AM-16 103.6 (110.2) 105.0 American 18 AM-18 [102.0] Apollo C/B (15'9") APOL 92.4 96.6 94.4 (90.0) (89.1) Aqua Finn AQFN 106.3 106.4 Arrow 15 ARO15 (96.7) (96.4) B14 B14 (81.0) (83.9) Bandit (Canadian) BNDT 98.2 (100.2) Bandit 15 BND15 97.9 100.7 98.8 96.7 [96.7] Bandit 17 BND17 (97.0) [101.6] (99.5) Banshee BNSH 93.7 95.9 94.5 92.5 [90.6] Barnegat 17 BG-17 100.3 100.9 Barnegat Bay Sneakbox B16F 110.6 110.5 [107.4] Barracuda BAR (102.0) (100.0) Beetle Cat (12'4", Cat Rig) BEE-C 120.6 (121.7) 119.5 118.8 Blue Jay BJ 108.6 110.1 109.5 107.2 (106.7) Bombardier 4.8 BOM4.8 94.9 [97.1] 96.1 Bonito BNTO 122.3 (128.5) (122.5) Boss w/spi BOS 74.5 75.1 Buccaneer 18' spi (SWN18) BCN 86.9 89.2 87.0 86.3 85.4 Butterfly BUT 108.3 110.1 109.4 106.9 106.7 Buzz BUZ 80.5 81.4 Byte BYTE 97.4 97.7 97.4 96.3 [95.3] Byte CII BYTE2 (91.4) [91.7] [91.6] [90.4] [89.6] C Scow C-SC 79.1 81.4 80.1 78.1 77.6 Canoe (Int.) I-CAN 79.1 [81.6] 79.4 (79.0) Canoe 4 Mtr 4-CAN 121.0 121.6
    [Show full text]
  • Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book
    Learn about . A Learning and Activity Book Color your own guide to the birds that wing their way across the plains, hills, forests, deserts and mountains of Texas. Text Mark W. Lockwood Conservation Biologist, Natural Resource Program Editorial Direction Georg Zappler Art Director Elena T. Ivy Educational Consultants Juliann Pool Beverly Morrell © 1997 Texas Parks and Wildlife 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 PWD BK P4000-038 10/97 All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Another "Learn about Texas" publication from TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE PRESS ISBN- 1-885696-17-5 Key to the Cover 4 8 1 2 5 9 3 6 7 14 16 10 13 20 19 15 11 12 17 18 19 21 24 23 20 22 26 28 31 25 29 27 30 ©TPWPress 1997 1 Great Kiskadee 16 Blue Jay 2 Carolina Wren 17 Pyrrhuloxia 3 Carolina Chickadee 18 Pyrrhuloxia 4 Altamira Oriole 19 Northern Cardinal 5 Black-capped Vireo 20 Ovenbird 6 Black-capped Vireo 21 Brown Thrasher 7Tufted Titmouse 22 Belted Kingfisher 8 Painted Bunting 23 Belted Kingfisher 9 Indigo Bunting 24 Scissor-tailed Flycatcher 10 Green Jay 25 Wood Thrush 11 Green Kingfisher 26 Ruddy Turnstone 12 Green Kingfisher 27 Long-billed Thrasher 13 Vermillion Flycatcher 28 Killdeer 14 Vermillion Flycatcher 29 Olive Sparrow 15 Blue Jay 30 Olive Sparrow 31 Great Horned Owl =female =male Texas Birds More kinds of birds have been found in Texas than any other state in the United States: just over 600 species.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BULLETIN... Chapel Hill Bird Club September 2007
    birding the Triangle... and beyond, for over half-a-century c/o R. Gluck, 451 Melanie Ct. Chapel Hill, NC. 27514 [email protected] To : THE BULLETIN... Chapel Hill Bird Club September 2007 http://chbc.carolinanature.com ___________________________________ __ ______ _______________________________________ ___________ Vol. 35_____________________________________ No. 6 Good News, Grrrreat News New CHBC Season Underway... Good news: Bird Club member/officer Karen Piplani >> Upcoming Meeting : Monday, Sept. 24 retired from her job recently, which brings the GREAT news that she is able to take over as editor of this -- “American Oystercatchers” -- Bulletin, possibly as soon as the next issue! ...which just might free up enough time for me to get back to When/Where: 7:15pm./refreshments; 7:30pm./meeting doing some birding again!! The lounge, Olin T. Binkley Baptist Church, corner of THANKS Karen, and if you see her offer Hwy. 15-501 bypass and Willow Dr., behind University congratulations, and any thoughts/ideas you have for Mall, Chapel Hill. forthcoming Bulletins. ................................................................................ Who/What: Shiloh Schulte will tell us about the Membership List Updated! ecology of one of our most striking shorebirds, American Oystercatchers, which he has been studying since 2003 The Chapel Hill Bird Club mailing list was updated (currently at NCSU). Go here on the Web if you wish to over the summer, deleting those no longer currently preview his work: paid up in their dues, sooooo... if you're NOT reading this right now, but wish you were ; - ), you may have http://www.shilohandshevaun.com/Research.htm been dropped from the rolls, and need to contact Patsy ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Race Week
    09 gsbyra book.qxp 4/17/2009 3:07 PM Page 66 RACE WEEK History of Race Week Race Week has been an important part of ter books exist for Cruise Week with the the history of Great South Bay Yacht Racing GSBYRA logo on the front cover and an Association since the organization was advertisement on the back cover.From 1924 founded. Initially it was held off a different to the present year, a 6 by 9 inch book club each day as a cruise week to begin at serves as a yearbook to list the GSBYRA Babylon Yacht Club, move to South Side race schedule for the season, winners of tro- Yacht Club in Sayville, then on to Bellport phies and other pertinent information. Bay Yacht Club, and finally end at South Bay In 1927 a fifth race day at Point O’ Woods Yacht Club in Patchogue. Sailors raced dur- was added between Bay Shore and Sayville ing the afternoon, rendezvoused at night, race days. In 1936, Race Week expanded to a then sailed or were towed on to the next sixth race day when Timber Point was added location for the following race. Cruise Week to the schedule between Point O’ Woods was established in 1907.The earliest surviv- and Sayville, then dropped by 1938, when Bay ing mention of race week is a Bellport Bay Shore replaced Babylon with two race days Yacht Club Program and Instructions for and Patchogue replaced Bellport Bay with Regattas to be sailed over the Club Course two race days. In 1927, Fire Island donated a during the Season of 1913.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the Central
    Chapter 10: Terrestrial Biological Resources Chapter 10 1 Terrestrial Biological Resources 2 10.1 Introduction 3 This chapter describes terrestrial biological resources in the Study Area; and 4 potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the alternatives 5 evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Implementation of the 6 alternatives could affect terrestrial biological resources through potential changes 7 in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project (SWP) 8 and ecosystem restoration. 9 10.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 10 Requirements 11 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 12 this EIS could affect terrestrial biological resources in areas: along the shorelines 13 and in the waters of reservoirs that store CVP and SWP water supplies, along 14 rivers and waterways (including bypasses) impacted by changes in the operations 15 of CVP or SWP reservoirs, within agricultural areas served by CVP and SWP 16 water supplies, and modified to provide wetland habitat. Actions located on 17 public agency lands; or implemented, funded, or approved by Federal and state 18 agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal and state agency 19 policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach to 20 Environmental Analyses. 21 10.3 Affected Environment 22 This section describes terrestrial biological resources that could potentially be 23 affected by implementing the alternatives considered in this EIS. Changes in 24 terrestrial biological resources due to changes in CVP and SWP operations may 25 occur in the Trinity River, Central Valley, San Francisco Bay Area, Central Coast, 26 and Southern California regions.
    [Show full text]