<<

SYMBOLIC NARRATIVES/AFRICAN CINEMA

Audiences, Theory and the Moving Image

Edited by

JUNE GNANN!

with an Introduction by

lmruh Bakari

Publishing Contents

List of Contributors v Preface and Acknowledgements xii Abbreviations xvi

Part One: Contexts

I Introduction: African Cinema and the Emergent ...... , ...... 3 Jmruh Bakari

2 Afrka, the West andthe Analogy of Culture: The Cinematic Text afterMan •••.. .25 \ Sylvia: \¥ynte:

Part Two: Arguments

3 The Iconography of African Cinema: Wbat Is It and Hew Is It Jdentiliedl

Introduction . ..., ...... , ...... , ..... , , ...... 79 ColinPrescod The Iconography of West African Cinema ...... , ...... 81 .l�anthia Diawara Firstpublished in 2000 by the Respondents ...... 90 British Film Institute John Akomfrah and Asma El B4kri 21 Stephen Street, London WIP 21-N 4 Is the Decolonisation of the Mind a Prerequisite for the Independence of TheBritish Fihn Institute is the UK national agency with Thought and theCreative Practice of AfricanCinema? responsibilityfor encouraging the artsof :filmand television Introduction ...... , ...... 93 and conserving them in the national interest Ngugi Wa Thiong'o

The Intolerable Gift ...... 97 © Copyright BritishFilm Institute 2000 TeshomeGabriel Respondents ..... , , , , ...... , , ...... , ...... 103 Coverdesign: Bigfoot, London Nouri Bouzid and Mariama Hima

5 Wbat is she Link between Choseo Genres and Developed Ideologies Setby Wyvern 21 Ltd,Bristol in Mrican Cinema? Printedin Great Britain by St Edmundsbury Press, lntroduction., , ...... 106 Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk bwuh Bakari

African Cinema and Ideology: Tendencies and ...... , , ...... 109 British Librar;- Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Ferid Boughedir '""'' '"""'"''-'"" '""""''' '""''"" ' '" '""'-"' "' '"'"'''-"" •

31 See Wynter (Chap. 2). 32: See Pinesand Wlliem.en, Questions; RoyArmes) Third 'WorldFilm Making and the West (University of CaliforniaPress, 1987h Ella Shohat and Robert Starn, Unthinking Eurocent!ism (Routledge, 1994); Teshome Gabriel, Third Cinema and his various writings. Chapter 2 33 See Taylor (Chap.6). 34 Aspart of a special issue on }can Rouch an account of this conversation is reprinted as 'En Africa, the West and the Analogy of Culture 1965 entre Jean Rouch nous regardes comme des insectes', CinemAction, no. 81, 1996. 3-5 See Sylvia Wynter (Chap. 2). The Cinematic Text after Man 36 Fred Johnson, 'Cyberpunksin the White House\ in Jon Dovey (ed,),Fractal Dreams­ NewMeJia in Social Context(Lawrence & VVishart,1996}. Sylvia Wynter 37 See Kevin Rohins:1'Cyberspace and the "NorldWe Live In', in Jon Dovey (ed.), • Fractal Dreams. 38 See Chap. 9. 39 GeorgeLamming, 'Literature and Sovereignty',in Anne V. Adams and Janis A.Mayes (eds)) Mapping Intersections -AfricanLiterature and il.jricanDevelopment (Afric.an W-orld Introduction Press, 1998), pp. 25&-9. My proposed title, 'Africa, the West andthe Analogy of Culture: TheCinematic Text after 40 J.l;id., pp. 257-1). :Man' differs in two respects from the one listedin the conference programme CAfric:a, the Ibid., p. 41 257. West and Cultural Analogy: Filmafter Mankind' ). With respect to the first, not 'Cultural Mahoso (Chap. 9). 42 Analogy' but 'the Analogy of Culture'; to the second; not 'after Mankind' but 'after Man' 43 Ibid. - that is, 'The Cinematic Text after Man'. The two arelinked, and l thought that l would 44 See .M.anthiaDiawara, Black American Cinema (Routledge, 1993), forthese perspectives on make use of this fortunate error to explain mytitle. 'spectatorship'. This volume includes'Black Spectatorship:Problems of Identification and Why 'Man'?�to takethe second first.'Man' is not the human, .althoughit represents itself Resistance; which also appears in Screen, voL 29, no. 4,1988-; and 'TheOppositional Gaze; as ifit ·were. It is a specific, local-cultural conception of the human1 that of the Judaeo� Black Female SpectatorS-hip', alsopublished in bell hooks,Blm;.l;: Look$ (South End Press, ChristianYVest, in its now purely secularised form. 1 Its �Other' therefore is not woman, as 1992). l hope, to show. Rather because Man conceives of itsel£ through its Origin narrative or 45 Ibid.,p. 128. •offidal creation story' of Evolution,2 as having been bio-evolutionarily selected� its 'Other> 46 George Lamming. 'Literature andSovereignty', and 'Others> are necessarilythose categories of humans who are projected, in the terms of the same Origin narrative, as having been bio�evolutionarily dysseiected - i.e. a!J narive peoples, and most extremely, to the ultimately zero degree. all peoples of African descent, wholly or partly (i.e. negroes), whoare negatively marked as defective humans '�

tenns of this conception> and the field of meanings to which it gives rise. But what if we vvere to move outside this field? Outside its perspective or reference frame? Theidea behind the phrase and the title 'after Man' is to suggestthat thefunction of the cinematic text for the twenty-first century will be to move outside this field, thls concep­ tion, in order to redefine what it isto be human. In addition, because Man furtherdefines itseif as homo oeconomicus_ in the reoccupied place of its pre�nineteenth�century concep­ tion of itself as homo politicus (political man), as well as in that of its originally matrix feudal-Christian conception of itselfas homo religious (religious man), its�Othel, or signi­ fier of alterit'{to this sub-definition(and therefore the analogue, at the 1evel of the economic system� of natives/negroes at the overall levd of our present cultural order, and its societal •term of life'), is the category of the Poor� i.e. the jobless and semi-jobless; as well as> in and its Other, the degraded, fallen realm of an Earth fixed and motionless at the centre of terms of the global system as a whole, the so-called 'underdeveloped' countries of the universe as its dregs. {as it had been held to be in pre-Copernican astronomyJP the theworld. VVhile because economic }vfan is optimally defined as the Breadwinner (withthe new demand was that all nature should now be seen as being homogenous, uniform and working classes t.":terebybeing definedas the secondary Breadwinners to tbe middle classes,. svmmetrical. For the same lav;s of Nature, Ne\\'ion had argued, could now be seen to apply

specificatly to their investor upper class),5 the 'Other' to this definition is, logically, the t� heaven and earth alike, and in as in America. So that on this p remise, a. new order category of the jobless, semi-jobless Poor, together ·with that of the underdeveloped coun� of knowledge based on the gradual ao::eptance that the same kind of matter built aU parts tries, both of which are made to actualise the negative alterity status of defective of the universe as it built all parts of the earth. as well as that all matter was indeedgoverned Breadwinners. by the same causes or force s, could now be elaborated; one that could now permit human Tbe central thrust of the'after Man' of my title is therefore to propose, given the role of observers to extrapolate, from the constant qualities of bodies that are found to be within defective os Otherness analogically .imp ed upon thepeoples and countries of Africa and the the reach of our experiments,to all bodies whatsoever, seeing that the analogy ofNature is 12 black diaspora by therepresentational apparatus of our Western world system, central to always consonant with itself which is that of its cinematic text�that the challenge to be met by the black African, and The point of the phrase 'the analogy of culture� is, therefore, the following: that, in the

indeed , blackdiasporic, cinema for the twenty-firstcentury will thathe -ofdeconstructing the same way as Newton had argued on the basis of the premise of laws of Nature, that one present conception of the human� Man, together -with its corollarydefinition as homo oe.:o� could extrapolate from knowledge of the processes of functioning of the bodies nearest to nomicus; to deconstruct .,'ithboth, the order of consciousness. and mode of the aesthetic to us, in order to infer what had to be those of the bodies furthestfrom us, we too could now, whichthis conception leads and through which we normally think,feel and behave, This on the basis of a projected new premise of laws of culture which function equally for the cinemawill therefore be compelled, as it has already begun to do, ifstill tentativelyso, to contemporaty culture of the West as they have done for allhuman cultures hitherto, make reinscribe, in Oyde Taylor's phrase,6 and therebyredefine, the human on the basis of a new use of the analogy of culture in order to gai.•1insight into 'the bask principles of under­ iconography. One that will take its point of departure from the First Emergence of fUlly standing' of the Western cultural body. 13 That is, of thebody of which we are all, as Western huraan forms of life, as an Emergence that was to be later attested to by, inter alia, the con­ educated subjects, necessarily always already socialised. and therefore, in Fanonian terms. vergent explosion at multiplesites of the rock paintingsof some 30,000 zears ago, includ1-:tg sociogenetic subjects.l-4 Further, that we should be able to gain such insight into these that of theGrotto Apollo ofNamibia;1 as an explosion whose dynamic moving images bear principles on the spedfie basis of the analogy of the processes of functioningof the cultures vvitness to the presence of the representational apparatus inscripting of their 'forms oflife'1 of traditional Africa, as the cultures which alone e.."

i.ncludingour � contemporary half-sdentifi.c,half-mythic origin narrativeof Evolution), as this correlated clusters of meanings/representations able to mediate and govern- fMeaning' or tbat culture-centric (and, as also, in our case, class-centric) genre of being human. David Bohm points out, 'affects m.arter'13) -if in always culturally relative terms, the bio­ \Vhy, 'The Analogyof Culture'? I have adapted the concept fromIsaac Newton. As Amos chemical reward and punishment system of the which functionsin the case of purely Funkenstein points outj in the wake of the fifteenth�centuryvoyages of the Portuguese organic forms ofHfe, to directlymotivate and demotivate the ensemble ofbehaviours19that around the hitherto believedto be unroundable bulge of West Africa and of their landing are of adaptive ad\rantage to each species.::o Yet how exactly, in the case of humans, does on the shores of Senegal in !444� as well as of that of Columbus across the hitherto believed the mediation by the verbalgoverning codes and their clusters of meaning, theirrecoding to be non-navigable Atlantic Ocean, and of his landing on a Caribbean island in 1492; as of the behaviour-motivational biochemical reward and punishment system specific to 1vel11 too, in the wake of the 1543 publication of Copernicus' 'Of the Revolution of the pure...ly organic forms of life, take place?What are the laws that govern their mediating and Spheres,'SI Newton, likeall scientist� of the seventeenth-centuJJ'. found himself empowered recoding function? to make a new - , demand on thebasis of the new image of theEarth and conception of the My proposal here willbe that the traditional (i.e. pre Islamic pre-Christian) cultures of cosmosto which boththe empirical voyages and Copernicus' astronomyhad led. to In place Africa are the'cuitural bodies' bestable toprovide us with insights into what thelaws that of the traditional acceptance of an Earth ostensib�ydivided into habitable and inhabitable governthis mediation, and, thereby, our behaviours, must necessarilybe. SpecificaUy, in the regions (as it had been held to be in the orthodox geographyof Europe before the voyages)) caseof our contemporary Western world system, to decipherwhat must be the governing or of a universe divided o by an ostensibly ont logical difference of substance between the code and its related, representation system (including centrally thatof the iconography of inconuptible perfection of a celestial reaim which moved in harmoniously ordered circles; the Western cinematic text), which now functions to induce our present global collective ensemble of behaviours - doing so on the basis of the analogy of culture premised to be, ferent civilisation from thoseof1 say, andEurope. Secondly� The:Idea ofAfri.ca goes on like tbe analogy of nature, always consonant ·with itself, to analyse the ways in which Africa, as well as Asia and Europe, have been represented in Western scholarship by fantasies and constructs made up by scholars and writers since Greek times. 'From Herodotus onwards', Mudimbe writes, The Argument

The cinema and its new iconographic language made their firsr appearance on theWest's self-representations have always induded images of peoples situated outside of 28 December, 1895, some one hundred years ago. On tbat day, the brothers LumiCre its cultural and imaginary frontiers. The paradox is that, if indeed these outsiders were showed their firstfilm in Paris, A decade or so before> in 1884, and lnthe wake of a meet� understood as localised and far away geographically, they vrere none the less imagined and ing by the dominan� Western powers in Berlin, the scramble for Africa by western projected as the intimate and other side of the European thinking subject , , . lnany case, European nation�states beganin the contextof an accelerated process of colonisation.This sin-cethe 15thc entury, the idea of Afri.;:a has mingledtogether new .scientific and process was to fullyincorporate the peoples ofblack Africa,and indeed of Africa as a whole, ideological interpretations with the semantic fields of concepts suchas primitivismand into the industrial era as an appendage to, and mere logistical extension of, the Western savagery. The geographic e.xpansion of Europe and its civilisation was then a holy saga of techno-industrial world system. mythic proportions. The only problem- and it is a big one- is that. as this civilisation By 1897, as Ukadike points out in a recent book, the film titles of succeeding Lumihe developed. it submitted the world to its memory.:::s films had begun to define the role that the representation of an Afric� stigmatised with ex-otidsm as the backdrop landscape for innumerable Tarza.'1 figw·es confronting African This latter point is the central thesis that I want to put forward in this paper. There are. 'natives' and African primates that were indistinguishable fromeach other, was to play in therefore> two central proposals here. The first is that if, as Mudimbe suggests� with the the modernWestern cinematic text.21 For the new medium of cinema was itsclf to play a, development of itspost-medieval civilisation, the West seemed to be sanctioned by, andto if at tf-..at time still limited, role in the legitimation of t.i)e incorporation of Africa into the produce, terrible evils that only a mad person could have imagined� including 'three

·western imperial: system in post-slave trade terms. New1 becauSe this was not the first remarkable monstrosities - the slave trade, colonialism and imperialism at the end of the > encounter of Africa and an expandingWest. Some four and a half centuries before the birth eighteenth, and throughout the nineteenth fascism and Nazism in the hventieth ,26 this is of the cinema, �n the earlydecades of thefifteenth-century, what wa.Uo become the West­ sobecause theWest was to be itself submitted to the same memory to which it would sub� em world system had been first putin place in the-wake of two voyages. Thesevoyages were mit the rest of the world, It was to be that same memory that would lead,. on the other side to transfurm the history of the species. The first was that of thePortuguese ships andtheir of the equation, to equally unimaginableachievements in many fields.These achievemenis eventual rounding of what had beenfur Europeans the hitherto believed to be unround­ included, centrally� the field of technologyout of which the cinema was to emerge. It would able Cape Bojador on the bulge ofWest Africa, followed by the Portuguese landing, in 1444, include also WesternMan� s and, by proxy,the humans'� firstfootfall on theMoon, together on the shores of Senegnl. Their, at first, forcible initiation of a trade both in gold and in -..'lith the audiovisual communications revolution and> today, the computer-driven infor­ slaves wasto be at the origin of today•s black African diaspora. The second voyage .,.HaS that mation systems that now circlethe globe. The paradoxhere is that all of these technological of Columbus across a hitherto also believed to be non�navigable Atlantic Ocean and his revolutions have increasingly served to :moretotally submit mankind to the single \Vest ern landing on an island in theCaribbean in 1492. This voyage was followed by theWest's and, in Clifford Geertz's term, 'local culture' memory that has made it all possible; thatin expropriationof thelands of theCaribbean and the Americas.The accelerated slave trade effect has rnade our gathering here today, with all of us in thisrooml being able to under­ out of Africaby severalEuropean countriesprovided the forced labour for the \"lest'sdevel­ stand each other� conceivable. Unimaginable evil, therefore) side by sid� with the dazzling Opment of large-scale commercial agriculture in these newlyexpropriated lands. scientific, technological and other triumphs. The \Vestern world system was therefore to be initiated on the basis of the bringing The second proposal is that if no other medium was to be more effective than that of together of three hitherto separate worlds, their peoples and their cultural spheres; that of the cinema in ensuring the continued submission to its $ingle memory of the peoples whom Europe, that of Africa, and that of the indigenous populations of theWestern hemisphere. the West has subordinated in the course of its rise to world hegemony, no other medium It was out of this bringing together that today's Caribbean and the Americas, like moder� is sopotentially equipped to effectour common human emancipation from this memor;, nityitsel� were to be born.tz from, therefore, in Nietzsche's terms, the prison walls of its worM pe-rceptionP or. in In his recent book TheIdea ofAfrica, V. Y. Mudimbe makesa seminal point whichallows Marx's, from its ideology;23 or in mine, from the culture-specific order of consciousness us to correlate thesethree dates\ that of 1444� that of 1884) and that of 1895 - that is to say, or mode: of mind of which this memory is a centrally instituting function.29 This memory) the landing on the shores of Senegal, the scramble for Africa, the birth of the cinema- and I shall propose here, is the memory of the 'Man' of my title; that� therefore, of a specific to do this 'WittJn a reconceptuali.sation of the past from a world systemic perspec!:iYe that conception of the human, the first secular or degodded (i.e. detached from its earlier is central to the argument I want to make here. 23 millennial anchoring in the realm of the supernatural) conception of the human in His new book The Idea ofAfrica, Mudimbe tells us, is both the product and continua­ history. The memory, therefore, of a mode of being human that had been unknown, tion of his by now classic TheInvention ofA.jr..ca.14 This is so in tvvo ;vays. First, Theidea of as Foucault points out, beforeits invention by European culture in tbe sixteenth century, Africa asserts that there are natural features) cultural characteristics and probable values if in a then still partly religious form,30 In the nineteenth century, however, as he also specific to the reality of Africa as a continent, which serve to constitute it as a totally dif- shows, this conception was to be inscripted in a purely secular, because biologised, form by the then new, 'fundamental anangemenrs of knowledge' put in place by the and mass appeal of the cinematic dream factoriesof Holl)"nood's commercial cinema, in matrix disciplines of economics, biology, philology. By, therefore, the arrangements particular� directly derive from their ability both to provide an illusory escape frolU our that we have inherited, along with, in Mudlmbe's terms, their- gro\md or epistemological present mode of reality, and at the same time to reinforce it. For they pmvide the escape locus and conceptual modes of analysis or paradigms,:>� as the model/paradigms in the very terms of thememory and understandingthat gave rise to this realityin the first through which, as Western or Western-educated filmmakers and scholars, we normally place; terms in whkh its celluloid heroes and heroines are shown, in the end, to succeed, know, and represent, even where oppositionallyso, the socialreality of our contemporary against all odds, in mastering our contemporary reality. The paradox here is that it was, world.;;:: and continues to be, the systemicallynegativ e experiencing of this empirical realityby Lhe The centralproblem here is if, that as Foucaultnoted, Man •vas inventedin the terms of vast majority of the individualspectators \vhose real lives are prescriptively lived according a specificculture, that of sixteenth-century Europe,the anthropologist Jacob Pandian also to \"fays in "-'lhich the cards are dealt, that then makes the escapist fantasies of HoHywuod reminds us that thisnew mode of identity was to be a direct transformation of the identity into a necessity rather than a luxur;'. In tha4 it is because the experience of their real-life of Christian, that is, of the matrix identity of medieval L-atinChristian Europe.55 Now, the reality is such a persistently harSh and unfulfilled one for the cinema)s mass audiences, implication of the fact thatthe identity of Man is a transformof Christian,.is not normally that the fantasy of escaping from it becomes an urgent consumer need. This is so, given graspable withinthe terms of our disciplines, through whose reference frameswe know and that in the wake of the Wesfs secularisation of Christian as Man, and with the world represent reality. This is so because. while the medieval public Identityof Christianwas eas­ system that it would bring into existence,being based on this transformation, an increas­ ilyidentifiable as belonging to a specific religious creedand system of belief, and therefore ing loss of the guarantees that had been provided for, in ali earlier 'forms of life\ by the to what Lyotard calls a �Grand Narrative of Emancipation?'4 the parallel linkage is not realm of the sacred, of the supernatural, l\'Ould come to be experienced. Hence, as normally seeab1e in the case of Matt as the now purely secularised variant of Christian. Heidegger noted, the emergence of the intensified formof insecurity that characterises Rather,instead of thereality of Man's existencebeing recognisedas a culture-specificmode and motivates the modern human and that now continually brings individuals and of identity which functionswithin the terms of a secular belief systemor Gra�d Narrative groups into conflict with their fellows36 sinceall of us are driven, because of the unceasing of Emancipation, that is itself thetransformed analogue of the religious beliefsystem and competition to which this insecurityhas led, to manipulate bothnature and each otherin Origin Narrative of feudal-Christian Europe, Man is conceived of as an acultural mode of order to ensure our own certainty and well�being. Such behaviours should not, however, being. As one, therefOre, whose ostenSible pre-given and biologically determined 'human as Heidegger further points out1 be interpreted in theusual terms: that is, as being due to nature'is supposed to determine the behaviours that collectively lead to a socialreality that the political and personal ambition of individuals as Machiavelli would have had it� or is then represented as theway things are in themselves, the way !·hey �wtfi have to be, with to the universal desire for biological selfM preservation, as Hobbes would have interpreted. thi.srepresentation then serving a teleologicalpurpose. For how cm1 one flyin theface of a Rather, these behaviours should be seen as being directly caused by our present Ul1der­ reality,even where one is condemned by, and in) it? standing of mankind's humanity7 and the subsequent attempt of all men, all womenl of allof us, to rea1ise it; the attempt of allof us. to realise being in the terms of contem­ be The Dealt Cards, the Paradox of the Appeal of Mass porary modernity and of its techno-industrial mode of reality, to in effect, modern, be Man.37 Commercial Cinema and the Conference Organisers' The mass appeal of contemporarycommercial cinema is therefore due to the formulaic Question \ that induces us to thwarted, at the same time, these very masses are being drawn by means of cinematic bring thisreality intobeing by means of the collective behavioursthat this understanding fantasies and their plot-lines, into the consumer··producer network of contemporary motivates; in effect,behaviours induced in the terms of thespecific order of consciousness techno-industrial civilisation. That iS1 into the civilisation that is increasingly bringing to and mode of memory to which such an understanding and conception leads. an end the long agrarian era of mankind in which African civilisations,for example> had So how are we to contradict this reality? Call in question its always alreadydealt cards, gmwn and flourished. In consequence. since it is t:P..rough these Hollywood model cine­ its stacked deck? If we are to do so, we must first understand that it is because of this matic textsthat all the world's peoples are beinginduced to aspire to realise being, however ontological dilemma that the commercial cinema of Hollywood and India has had such vicariously, in Westernised terms, to be Man, and to be modern, the success of commer­ spectacularsuccess with mass audiences in Africaand thediaspor.a. In thatthe global reach cial cinema with its up-to-the� minute re-enacting of the idealtechno-industrial lifestyle a..'l.d optimum behaviours defining of thehuman within the terms of our present under­ people; as an issue and a problem that could not therefore be made into a subordinatepart standing of our humanity is ensured. of any other .issue or problem,44 Here Manthia Diawara•s analy-sis of the narrational units This widespread success of mass commercial cinema, and the paradox that it poses of the film, induding those in which the brutal biaclc character Gus attempts to rape the for an emergent African dnema, is one of the major issues that the organisers of this white Little Sister, who jumps off the cliff to escape him, later dying ill her brother's, conference have posed. How, they ask, are the filmmakers of black Africa to confront and the Little Colonel's, arms (with the Little Colonel thereby justly punishing Gus, by organ· deal with the dichotomy whichseems to definitely separate the possibilities of a commer� ising his execution by the Ku KluxKlan); reveals why this filmwas to evoke such dalised mass appreciation of African cinema, and of African cinema as a valued cultural deep outrage on the part of black American viewers, and to make them into one of the artform? V\T.b.at it as they further suggest, the either/or choice of commercial mass success, earliest groups of actively resisting spectators:�s on t.lJe one hand, or of seeking to produce a cinema of aestheticforce and cultural integrity As Diawara further comments;the black spectator, confronted¥ti.th such a scene) is p1aced on the other hand - what if this would call for the elaboration of a new conceptual in an impossible position. Drawn by the storyline to, on theone hand, identify\'lith the white ground?33 \Vould such a new ground not have to be one which, in my O\YTI terms, moves Little Sister as victim, feel grief for her, as well as desire vengeance agajnst Gus, on the other1 outside theparameters of the memory of 1\fan, as the memory to which we are at present the black spectator was also compeUed to resiSt the thematic representation of the black submitted? Outside its understanding of our humanity? man as a dangerous,atavistic threat. The film's systemic negative marking of the black male (played in blackface by a white actor), would therefore, Dia:wara writesl lead black Americans not only to •lobby for laws banning racial slandering) but also to begin the pro­ The Birth of a Nation, Resisting Spectators, and the Issue of duction of their long line of movies<:: ailed "'race movies»'. For in this context, the name 'race Consciousness/Memory as an lssue-in-lt1.1elf: The Cinema and movies' signified not only that black Americans had recognised the need to fight their bat� World Outlooks tie against racial subordination in the new language of the cinema Itsel£ It also signified the To address this issue, I shall bring in two other significant dates from the early history V>.ridespread recognition that Griffith's film had confronted black Americans withan issue of the cinema, and of the Western cinematic text. The first date is that of 1915, the year specific to them as a group, one that would have to be fought in the terms of a counter­ in which D. '\V. Griffith's Birth of a W'aS Nation first screened. Thls year also saw the iconography to that of Griffith's. Above all, that this would have to be done not as an 'ethnic' emergence of black Americans as, in the terms of Manthla Diawara, a 'group of resisting group,4E but rather as a group that had been conceptually and aesthetically constituted, spectators�.39 The paradox here was that Griffith's innovations, as far as the art of cinema 1'lithin the- terms of the now globally hegemonic culture of the West, asthe signifier of alter­ was concerned, were far�reaching, and would set the pattern for many techniques of ityor Otherness, both to post-abolition America as it now reinvented itself in the terms of cinema that were to follow. Indeed, the aesthetic force and power of Griffith's technical its being a white nation, as well as, at a global scale, together with all peoples of African innovations would lead filmmakers of the stature of an Eisenstein not only to hail him descent, as Other to Mtm;47 a group •vhose members are thereby made to experience them� as one of the genuine masters of the American cinema- i.e. •a magician of tempo and selves as the deviant Other to being human •vithin the terms of Man, within the terms of montage'40 - but to be also deeply influenced by the new techniques in the series of the memory, and order of consciousness therefore to which they/we were,and are stillnow, masterpieces that Eisenstein ms himself to conceive and direct. In terms of content,how· submitted. ever, while the film Birth of a Nation provided a S}'nlbolic charter that not only unified This takes us to the cinema of black Africa. For although, as V'kadike points out, France North and South after the Civil'Warj but laid the basisof the eventual integration of Anglo· had banned the showing of Griffith's film, Birthof a Nation in order not to offend its black Americans 'Withthe diverse immigrantEuropea:"'l ethnic groups, it did so on the basis of a colonial troops and the elite of its African colonies,4a- the same issue that had been raised by racial identity that could o.Ply be sustained by the symbolic, conceptual and empirkai black America's response vvas:to be raised by black African filmmakers in the wake of polit­ exclusion of black Americans, as a people of African descent, whether unmixed or t:Oixed. ical independence, as an issue also experiencedas being urgently specific to them.This issue, The integration of North/South Immigrant/Anglo� Americawas therefore to be effected by even where it remained as a subtext of their f1Jms, had to do with t.qe reality of a hegemonic means of thecreation of a powerful new stereotype, that of the black American male. This \-Vestern memory and its order of consciousness, as one to which, even after politkal inde­ stereotype \¥aS that of the violent, sensual, 'big black buck' bent on assaulting white men pendence had been won by sodal and military struggles, they stillfound themsclves, as an and raping white '''omen;41 and thereby of 'miscegenating' the 'racial purity' of the hege� educated elite, submitted; perhaps� even more so, after independence, 49 For in the same way monic population group of European I hereditary descent. as the black American, in order to identify himself/herself as a middle class American, post­ As a result; if, as Michelle Wallace points out, the film had set out to justify theemer� abolition, had been compelledto negate not only his/her physiognomy, but the stigma of any gence of the Ku Klux Klan by giving a tailored version of ReconstructJon's lmpact on the African cultural characteristics that had been brought in on the slave ships across theMid­ South,41 its screening was also to be a watershed in what might be calledthe history I of con­ dle Passage, equally, post·independence filmmakers of black Africa found that in order to sciousness of black America.43 For its screening set off the process by which black t identitythemselves as middle class men or women, they too had to deny, to be aversive to, Americans, like black peoples everywhere, would gradually come to recognise that the issue the reality of their original cultural reality as a realitynegatively marked and represented as of consciousness, althougha secondary and epiphenomenal issue for all forms ofW estem backward.primitive and savage. They too fou.r1d that, as in the case of Birth ofa Nation, no thought (includingthe oppositional thought ofMarxismandfeminism), was to be the issue other mediumwould so blatantlyforce them to a choice of options as would the new medium specific, as Airne cesaire was to write in 1956, to the uniqueness of theproblem of black I of cinema. as deployed by the formulaic stock f.ue of theWestern cinematic text; nor so ' forcibly remind them not only that after the struggles by which political independence had vvill ahva.ys be, the truebasis of aesthetics and that willensure our mastery of the new tech­ been won, the issue 'With which they were and are still confronted is that of the Sisyphean nioues'. So that, in 'this context1 the means of eA.-pression would sen-e the n1ediumfor a issue of the memory of 1\1a n, of theprison walls of its world pen::eption or order of con� m�re perfect embodiment of more loftyforms of world outlook .. .'56 sciousness, but also that there� aspre �dptivcly find itselfenslaved to the unending global production of poverty which is fore, of the phenomenon of consciousness by means we can of which alone subjectively the necessa,ry underside Of the this-worldly goal of Material Redemption from Natural ex perience ourselves ashuman. 54 Scarcity, and therefore, of the no less unending production of wealth that :isthe correlate !n 1946, in the of the eagerlya'W<'!ited ending ofVVo rld War Eisenstein wrote: wake II, of 4Y.f an's optimal self-definition as homo oeconomicus1 and Breadwinner. In that ifwe see our present this�worldly goal of Material Redemption as the secular form of the other­ The cinema is 50 years old, It has possibilities that must be used,just asin the age of vast I worldly goal of Spirirual Redemption that had been centra! to the Grand Narrative of modern physk·s the mustbe used for peaceful purposes. But how immeasurably littie ! Emancipation fo unding to the religion of Judaeo-Christianity> and therefore to the civili­ the world aesthetics has achieved inmastering the means and potentialities of the sation of Western Europe� in the same way thatthe matrix goal of Spiritual Redemption had cinema.ss been generated from that narrative's inscripting of the human as a being enslaved to Adamic Original Sin1 with his/her redemption only therefore made possible by adherence At theheight of the war, he continued, 'his dream andhope had been thatwhen peace came� to the behaviours prescribed by the Church, as the only behaviours able to realise thehope a victorious humanity would use its liberated energies to create new aesthetic: values, to of EternalSalvation in the Augustinian City of God, then ourpresent biocentric and opti­ attain new summits of culture'. Wit..� peace} however1 not only bad thesplitting of the atom mally economic conception of the human can also be recognised as having its historical and the use of the nudear bomb which followed it brought new probjem.oli for manldn� origin in the intellectual revolution of lay humanism. That is� in the latter's invention but the cinema itself had failed to realise its potential promise, VVhy had this been? 'It was of the identity of lvL:min the place of the identity of Christit:J.n, if at fustonly in a hybridly not') he writes� 'only because of a lack of skill, of enthusiasm. It was because of striking con� religious and political form that at the end of the eighteenth century was to be reinvented servatism, routine} aesthetic escapism, in the of the new problems set by every new in a now purely secular} because biologised, fo rm.60 This, at the same time as this ongoing was phase in the rapid development of cinematography.' And the central issue here that, s.ecularisation of identity) the matrix behaviour-motivational other�wcJrld1y goal of Sp iri­ while we have no reason to doubt our capacityto solve these problems. 'vte should always tual Redemption. would also be transumed: into this-worldly ones) the first, political, the bear in mind that it is the profound ideological meaning of subjectand content that is, and second, from the end of the eighteenth <:entury on, economic.61 This may, at first) seem startling. Yet once we recognise that the 'cultural field, in which role of Africa both ·within the scholarly and dnematic texts, as well as within the socio­ we all now find ourselves is that of Clifford Gee1tz's 'local culturat' of the West and1 there­ economic structures of ow· present world system, So that, ifwithin the logic of the matrix fo re, that of the Judaeo-Christian culture for '\Vh ich the behaviour�motivating schema medieval Grand Narrative of Emancipation of Christianity and its system of representa­ and Narrative of Emancipation as originaHy fo rmulated by St Augustine continues to tion, it had been the category of tbe leper .vith its leprosy which, proscribed outside the function,62 if in a now purely secular and transumed form, two consequences can be seen gates of the medieval town as the ostensibly actualised icon of his/her parents' sexua llust,fi? to follow. The first is that our present behaviour-motivating systemic goal of economic and therebyas proof of mankind1S represented enslavement to Origi nal Sin, that had legit­ growth, development, i.e. or of lvfaterial Redemption, can now be identified as a logk

transformation of the original matrixJudaeo-Christian goal ofSp iritw:!l Redemption. \'ifhile poor and jobless category Marx's lumpen proletariat, Fanon's Les damnes de la terre70 � the founding Augustinian postulate of the source of evil as being sited in mankind's who must remain proscribed in theghetto atld shantytown archipelagos of the First, Third enslavement to Original Sin can also be seen to have taken new fo rm in the discourses of and FourthWo rlds, and in the ultimate world of Africa. Since it is this category that now Malthus and ofRkardo (where it became translated into that of our enslavement to Nat­ serves, within the terms of Man's secular Narrative of Emancipation, a.s the actualised icon, ural Sca.rdty),63 as well as in the new cosmogonic schema ofDa.nvinism, in the reoccupied ofhumankind• s threatened enslavement to Na tural Scarcity in the reoccupied pla-ce of its place of the Biblical Genesis and of its Adamic Fall. In these latter discourses and cos­ post�Adarnic enslavement to Original Sin. Given that it is the dually represented and con­ mogenic schema, the source of evil now came to be sited in humankind's postulated cretely produced presence of the categories of the jobless Poora nd of the 'underdeveloped' enslavement, not now to Original Si� but ratherto the random and arbitrary pro>:esses of peoples, as signifiers of genetically dysselected humans, who as defective Breadwinners are bloevolutionary Natural 'selection' and ;:;,tJCl i;> }' which is based on what parallel point here V!-'t!S that the phenomenon of the fo rced notion of human fn:edom."6 In an African scholar, L R Sow, has identified as the 'theoretical fiction' of a purely biological lawlike consequence of theSoviet New Class bureaucracy's to install itself as a new ruling and therefore non-dlanglng human nature;,84 the mind is .35 Indeed, conscious­ that once the Party bureaucracyor Norn.enklaturahad come of human ness has also been defined within the logic of our present understanding of what it is to be class, it had been able to legitimate this only by redefining socialism's notion with the nationalisation of human, by the DNA discoverer and Nobel Prize \vinner Crick, as being merely 'a pack of emancipation and autonomy, in terms that made it isomorphic as a notion of freedom that neurons.'85\Vhilefor the counter�discourse ofMarx.ism, consciousness� because labelled as the means ofproduction, under the total control of the Party: New Classbureaucracy over the ideol ogy� and as such, as a merely superstructural or epiphenomena! effect of the economic had then functioned to legitimate L� e dictatorship of the had seized power. mode of produ-ction, cannot be recognised as an issue in its own terms, anv more than the real-life proletariat or working classesin whose name they by the New Class or Party correlated issues of race or of povertyand Joblessne-sseatl be seen as issues in their own. James's point thatit was the notion of freedom71 as redefined Gulag, and of the Here Mudimbe)s point, that all oppositional movements, including that of the most Nomenklatura that \vas a central determinant of the institution of the or all groups o:r individuals extreme Afrocentrism; and indeed that ofMarxism and of fe minism. must necessarily think internment in these forced labour archipelagos, of any themselves within the 'ground' of the contemporary epistemological locus of the West and Mohammed. They were the last holders of African spiritualism before it became tinged its conceptual models of analysis, even where they contest some of its surface structure with Islam or Christianity. The Ceddo from Pakao resisted the Muslims who wanted to premises,87 enables us to see why our present understanding of Man and its biologised con­ convert them, with a suicidal opposition. Their wives and children drowned themselves in ception of being human must lawlikely block recognition of the issue of memory, of springs in order to remain faithful to their African spirituality.95 consciousness, as being the primary issue of our times. Rather, so powerfully pervasive is the 'theoretical fiction' of our fixed biological human nature that, although, as Antonio de However, while Sembene canonises the struggle in Ceddo in epic terms, he also shows, in Nicolas points out, it is clear, given the diversity of human religions, as well as of human other films, that all such orders of consciousness, world outlooks and the memories of dif­ cultures, that men and women have 'never been any one particular thing or had any ferent traditions and cultures can also outlive their usefulness. At the end of another film, particular nature to tie them down metaphysically', and that, instead, we become human Emitai (1971), (the god of thunder), for example, he also suggests that the consciousness only by means of the conceptions (i.e. theories) of being human that are specific to each and memory of such traditional religions may also have outlived their usefulness; that they culture, 88 there is stubborn resistance to the recognition that it is these conceptions that too must give way to a new consciousness. Consequently, in an episode of the film, he shows encode, as the anthropologist John Davis points out, each culture's criterion of 'what it is how, in the wake of the Diola villagers' defeat by the French, a defeat that leads them to to be a good man and woman of one's kind' ,89 as the criteria of optimal being that motivate begin to question the old religion, the Spirits threaten the chief that ifhe ceases to continue us to attain to the representation of symbolic life that they encode, and which is the only to believe in them, he will die. Yes, Sembene has the chief answer, he will die, but they too life that humans live.90 It is here, therefore, that the centrality to human orders of repre­ \vill die with him. 96 Sembene' s point here is that the Spirits exist because of the chiefs and sentational apparatuses, including that of the cinematic text to our contemporary own, the Diola villagers' collective belief in them, in the same way as, in my own terms, 'Man' becomes apparent. For if, as Antonio de Nicolas points out, we are enabled to live and actu­ (and its purely biologised self-conception) exists because of ours. alise these conceptions ofbeinghuman, and therefore to be consCious of, to experiencebeing My major proposal therefore parallels that of Sembene's Emitai - that is, that a new in their culture-specific terms, only because of our capacity to tum theory into flesh, and conceptual ground for African cinema willcall for our putting an end to our present con­ into 'codings in the nervous system', this process of transmutation can be effected only by ception of being human. In that, in the same ways as in Emitai, the Spirits had existed only means of the system of representations in whose terms we are socialised as subjects, since as a function ofthat traditional Agrarian conception of being, and therefore because of the it is these that function to 'tie us down metaphysically' to each culture's criterion of what collective beliefheld by the people and chief of the village in that conception, so our pre­ it is to be human. Hence the paradox that our present purely biologised conception ofbeing sent Western bourgeois or ethno-class, techno-industrial conception of being Man exists human, that is, its 'presentation' of the human on the model of the natural organism (as only because of our collective belief in, and faithful adherence to, its now purely secular or this model is elaborated, Foucault shows, by our present 'fundamental arrangements of desupernaturalisedidegodded criterion of what it is to be good man or woman of our knowledge' and their disciplinary paradigms),91 does indeed so serve to 'tie us down' kind.97 Only because, in other words, of our continued subordination to the memory and metaphysically to its 'theoretical fiction' of 'human nature'. At the same time as its bio­ order of consciousness to which this conception/criterion gives rise; to, in effect, its notion centric strategy of identity, its representation of the human as a purely biological being who of tl1e 'freedom package' as Material Redemption, rather than as freedomfrom the mode of pre-exists culture, the Word, has come to both reoccupy and displace, at the global public memory and world outlook which induces us to conceive of freedom in the terms of Man's level of a now economically rather than religiously organised reality, the formerly dominant conception of being. How then shall we reimagine freedom as emancipation fromour pre­ theocentric strategies of monotheistic identity,92 whether that of Judaism, Judaeo­ sent ethno-dass or Western-bourgeois conception of fr eedom? And therefore, in human, Christianity or of Islam. And, to effect, thereby, the ongoing displacement or the rather than as now, Man's, terms? poiiticising of these religious identities as, in its time, Islam - as Sembene chronicles one The fundamental question then becomes: can a new conception of freedom, defined as instance of in his fihn Ceddo (1976),9?> - had displaced and reoccupied the traditional reli­ that of attaining to the autonomy of consciOusness and, thereby, of autonomy with respect gions of Africa and their then local polytheistic and essentially agrarian strategies of to the always culture-specific self-conception in the terms of whose governing codes of identity, self-conception and therefore consciousness.94 symbolic life and death and their respective criteria we are alone enabled to realise our­ In the film Ceddo, Sembene visualises the clash that took place between the polytheistic selves as specific modes of the human, provide us with the new ground called for by the strategies of the indigenous religions, and the monotheistic strategies of a then incoming conference organisers? And, thereby, with a new post-liberal and post-Marxian

These questions take me to the crux of my proposal with respe<:t to Africa, the \V est, and Sydney Pollack)), or as the backdrop for i\..-nerican.. adventurers and spe<:ulators who seek the analogy of culture; with what could be, therefore, the role of Md can cinema both in the industrial diamond mines of a vanis-hed civilisation guarded by terrifyingand specially­ the deconstruction of our present memory of Ma n, its order of consciousness, and their bred intelligent grey-skinned gorillas, at the same time as an American linguist h:l.ving reconstruction in the e�umenical terms of the planetary human. This .is the new ground to I taught a young gorilla to speak and use sign language has nevertheless come all the way to Ylhich l:ve given the name of 'the Second Emergence'. My further proposal here is that return her to her native wilds and to her own kind (Congo),HB reartkulate themselves. In it was with the challenge of this new ground with which black African cinema was, like I these films, we therefore see revisualisect if now in partly feminist guise (for example, in L black lunerkan cinema earlier, but even more comprehensively so, confronted from its Out of Africa the Scandinavian baroness heroine copes with herne'er�do-well aristocratic inception. husband as well as tvith a white hunter lover, manages her coffee-farm singk-handedly > and builds a school to teach the native children to read having convinced the native chief ! (shades of Bosambo!) that reading is a good thing!) the same constants. In effec4 from Sanders of the River to Out of Africa. and from King Solomon's Mi nes {1937, Robert Steven� The 'Colonial' or the 'Ontological' Rationale? The 'Gallery of son) to Congo, the reality of the African continent and of its varied peoples is made to Mirrors' of the Western Tex t and African Cinema towards the conform to a iawlikely prescribed pattern, 'A'hat is more, it is made to do so both befo re Second Emergence I of political independence and after political independence; both before the emergence an 'We've had enough', Pfuffcites Sembene assaying 'of feathers and tom�toms'.p; Thecentral independent black iUrkan cinema: and after the emergence ofsuch a cinema; both during I·I impulse behind the beginning of filmmakingin post··independence Africa wasindeed, as the colonial era and after the colonial era. Can ·v{e therefore speak here as does Barnouw, � Ukadike points out in his recent book on black African cinema, the common concern of of merely a colonial rationale as the causal factor which determines the lawlike production the filmmakers 'to provide a more rea1isric image ofAfrica as opposed to the distorted artis­ of these representations? tic and ideological expressions of the dominant film medium reflecting (to borrow ft om What if we are here dealing, more profound1]'1 with a kind of raticmale that can be no .100 Erik Barnouw's terminology) theattitudes that made up the coioniai rationale' For the I more seen to e.--rist as: an 'object of knowledge' within the terms of our present mainstream exoticised and "'primitive' celluloid stereotypes of ._<\fr ka which had been coterminous with l order of knowledge (which as Foucault points out 1-l,"t\S put in place at the end of theeigh­ the birth of the medium of film(specifically colonial fil:mssuch as (Martin john­ I. teenth and during the nineteenth centuryby Western thinkers), than,as he also points out, ! son) in 1932, an ostensible docun'lentary, seen from an explorer-cum-anthropological in the earlier pre-nineteenth-centuryclassical order of knowledge, the concept of'life' as a perspective, as well as Sanders of the River (Zoltan Korda) in 1935 and in 1937) had con­ biological phenomenon could have been seen to exist within the logic ofthe then discipline sistently provided a distorted view of'natives', portraying them as 'ingenuous, outlandish, of natural history? What if this rationale, whichI shaH tentatively title the ontological ratio­ somewhat mysterious beingswho were nevertheless loyal and grateful tothe Europeans for nale or the ratiortale of the symbolic code, is a rationale that opens us onto the issue of 101 coming to guide and protectthem' . This had; therefore, been a world outlook which, i11 consciousness as an issue in its own terms? One therefore that opens up to a new 'ground' spite of thepresence of PaulRobeson who played the role of:&sambo,that of an 'enlight­ beyond the ground of'Man', beyond its purely biotogised conception of being human, of ened' . native chief subservient to Sanders the powerful representative of the British human being? government; had 'served to portray allthe peoples of Africa in terms which legitimatedthe The proposal here is that the systemic.nature of the negatively marked (mis)representa­ colonising redemptive mission of the Europeans'; i.nsecular redemptive terms, therefore, tions of Africa1 Africans, as well as of all diasporic peoples of African descent (indeed of all rather ti:w.n, as in the earlier case of the missionaries, Christian redemptive terms; in which the non-white1 non-West¢rn, a.qd therefore 'native' Others), by the signifying practices not the polytheistic 'natives� had been primarily seen as heathens, pagans, and practitioners of only of tl1e cinematic texts of the West, fr-om the exoticised Africa of the LumiCre Broffiers idolatry, waiting to be brought into the only true because monotheistic path of spiritual in 1896 to Black Gus in Birth of a Nation, from the explorer ethnographic documentary 1 salvation . 02 Congorilla to the 'Third World' ethnographi� film Reassemblage (1983) by Trinh T. Minh­ A key point emerges here ··· that of the constancy of the representation. For although the Ha1104 from the backdrop of Africa inSamiers of the River to that in Out ofAfrica, the Africa term postcolonial is now widely used to indicate an Africa in which the anti-colonial of King Solomon's Mi nes and of Tarzan to that of the nauseous sentimentality of Gorillas in struggles waged during the 1950s and 1960s have resulted in political independence for the .Mist (1988, Michael Apted), to that of the recent Congo, should be seen as being due, Africa, with an end being put (except for South Africa, until very recently) to the political not to a colonial rationale, but more far-reacllingly to an ontological rationale, of which supre..111acy both of the colonial powers as well as of their scttler-colonisers, in spite of the the colonial rationale is but one variant expression. That, further, this ontological rationale fact, also, that a wide range of filmsby post-independence African fiimmakers have been is that of the govern ing code ofsymbolic life and death, together with the related under­ produced, the representational role of Africain the basic plot line, iconography and matrix standing of Man�s humanity that is specific to the 'local culture' of the Judaeo-Christian narrational units of the Western cinematic text} although modernised and updated, and, West in its now purely secularised and bourgeois variant; in effect the code of Man, and in the case of the filmCongo (1995, FmnkMarshali), even gone high tech, remains the same, therefore of the human in its Wes!ern bourgeois, or ethno-class expression. In addition, the furtherproposal here is that if it is the rules generated by this code that the rock painting fromNamibia, 1 "'>ant to emphasise a central suggestion that was put for­ govern the repr esentations of Africa and peoples of Mrican descent as well asof ali other ward at a 1987 FF.SPAC Conference bv the African scholar Theophile Obenga, In referring 'native' non-white peoples, doing so outs-£de tbe conscious aV><'areness of their Western and to the intellectual revolution ofRenaissance humanism by which the lay intelligentsia of \Vesternised filmmakers, these are the same rules that have led VVestern as v.rell as African fifteenth- and sixteenth�century Europe had laid the conceptual basis of the West's five and other non�vv �estern scholars trained in the methodologies of the social sciences and the centuries of globalexpansion, triumph and conquest, leading to the single history of secular related disciplines of our present order ofknowledge {or Foucauldia:n episteme) to sys­ modernity that we all now live, if severely unequally so, Obenga argues that they had been ternically kno-W' and 'represent' Africa by means of parallelsymbolically coded discourses able to do so only on the basis of a centtal and fu ndamental strategy. This strategy had that wer� �s: �ti.fied by -:ume CCsaire in his Dis course on Colonialism, 105 and later by enabled them to move outside the limits of their then hegemonically religious medieval­ Echvard &n a his m book Onentalism. 106 To thereby know and 'represent' Africa through Christian world, in effect, outside the limits of its 'epistemological locus', and order of what is. as.K C. Anyanyu cites .RogerBastide, 'an immense gailery of mirrors which only consciousness. in order to reconceptualise their past in new terms. These terms had been reflect the nnage of our (Western and affordedthe Renaissance intellectualsby their strategic returnto their paganGreco- Roman Westernised) selves, our desires or our passions ... [�oughl mirrors which deform', as their revalorisation thought 107 While;. if as Mudimbe proposed in The Invention of intellectual heritage1 as well of a heritage whose systemof had Afnca, both the world view of autocentric Africa and thatof 'African traditional systems of been either domesticated byclre theology ofmedieval Christianity or stigmatised by it It had thought' rather than being known and represented 'in the framework of their own ratio­ therefore been on the basis of their new reinterpretation of their past that they had been nalitY,have hitherto been knovvnand represented,by both \!ifestern and V't'estern�educated enabled to effectthe intellectual revolution of humanism, and to thereby give rise to the new Aftka� analyst�, :by means of , .. conceptual systems which depend on a Western epist-e­ image of the earth and conception of the cosmos that were to be indispensable to the emer� m�:ogJ.callocus , 1t would s�ggest that not even we ourselves, as African and black diaspora gence andgradual development ofthe natural sciences, as a new mode ofhuman cognitlon.1l3 cntrcs and filmmakers can., m the normal course of things, be entirelyfreed fromthe func­ And as centrally, to also give rise to an epochally new, because secularisi.n.g, conception of tioning ofthese rules; and, therefore, from knowingand representing the

positively marked representation of their 'artificial' .identity serves to induce desire for 1 and alisedlevel>lJi determinedby our culturallyinstituted modes of symbolic identity� it is only allegianceto, the culture-specific criterion of being which it encodes. For the Sara ofChad, by the latter's overriding of the 'directivesigns' of the former that our experience ofbeing therefore, the category of the life to v;hich the women give rise had to be as negatively human both as symbolic I and as a we based on symbolic, and therefore artificial, modes marked (i.e. as 'brute' or 'raw' life) as was the sign of menstrtuil blood of which the woman of kinship, can be enabled, is the bearer in the Terenomyth, given that both must now functionas signifiers of symbolic Anexample: soldiers who fight today's national wars and who must be prepared to die death; of 'ste.-ility' to the 'fecundity' of symbolic life. in defence of might very well be tempted, as individuals, by the genetic imperative Looked at transculturally> the image of menstrual blood can be identified as the image to save themselves. Yet given the enculturation process of school and home, and the social enacting of the Origin model of Procreation that is specific to societies of the agrarian era order in general, the genetic imperative is so automatically overridden that it can scarcely whose polytheistk religions had divinised Nature and the natural forces. Its macro-image be heard. \Vhe:nt in addition, Bosnian Serbs fight and kill Bosnian Muslims or vice versa, of Origin was,u4 however, to be increasingly displ�ced hy the rise of the monotheistic or when Tutsis kill Hut us or vice versa, m therefore, they do so as subjects enculturated in religions whose new Origin model of Cre ation would, by its degodding or de-divinis.ing of the terms of theirspecific groupidentities. It does not matter that. as in the caseof the Tut­ nature, repiace the menstrual blood Origin signifier vtith those of the macrotextual signi­ sis andHutus, theyall speak thesame language; - the positivism of linguistic identity is not fiers - as in the case of Original Sin � of their respective fa iths. AsScubla's analysis of the the issue here. Rather, the issue is that of narrative representations� of the symbolic identi­ Tereno myth therefore makes dear, the binary value opposition betvveen order/full ties to which theygive rise, and of the systems of domination and counter-domination to being, and the lack of full being (i.e. the positively marked tobaa:a smoke rising upwards) which their respective group narcissism impels them. 139 Given that such identities and and disorder (ie. the negatively marked menstrual blood flowing downwards), enacts the modes of symbolic kinship/u onhkinship are experiencedby their socialised subjects in no less ontological rationale of .a code in which the categoryof women are thebearer/signifiers of cognitiv�ly and affectively closed, and therefore narcissistic, a manner, than are thepurely 'raw' biological life) and that of men, theprocreato rs/creators of 'cooked' symbolic life, or genetically determined modes of conspedfidty of organic species. culture. This, however, should not be seen as an eftCct of what we have come to define as The fundamental hypothesis of our proposed new conceptual ground and world out­ 'patriarchy', and thereby interpreted in terms of the feminist paradigm as an empirical look, therefore, is that if the ritual ceremony of symbolicbirth as conceptualised by the Sara opposition between 'men' and 'women'. Rather, what is at issue here is an opposition that of Chad enables us to grasp the mechanisms by which Grassi's governing code v.- in our contemporary industria! order, and thereby in the termsof the also enables us to understand the nature of the price that had to be paid for the rupture now purely secularised variant of the Judaeo�Christian culture of the West, the physiog­ effected by such 'forms of life with the genetically detet·n1ined 'directive signs' that moti­ nnrnically different categories of o.-vo population groups, that of, on the one hand, the vate and necessitate the behaviours of purelyorganic life. This price, one that explains� inter Indo-Europeans, and o{, on the other� the Bantu-Africans, are deployed as the central alia; the lawlike nature of the 'gallery of mirrors'/representation of Africa and of all peoples means of the enacting of the governing code instituting of our present conception of the of African descentin the scholarly and cinematic texts of the ·west, is that of our having to human, Man, With Africa thereby having to be represented in the terms of this code, by remai'1 hitherto subordinated to the 'directive signs' generated fr om the narratively both the cinematic and scholarly texts of the West, as the abode and origin of the Hu man inscribed codes of symbolic life and death, signs 'tvhichnow function to motivate and neces­ Other. This, at the same time as all peoples of African descent must be negatively repre­ sitate our human behaviours in the terms of culture-specific fidds defined by the sented, within the logic of our present conception of being, Man, as 'brute' or

tate the behaviours of all organic species. ._tv;, Avram Goldstein explains in a recent book, and punishment systems of the brain, thereby enabling our human behaviours to be for all forms of organic life, a species-specific opioid system functions to signal reward on governed by the learned or acquiredmotivation system (Al\1S) specific to each 'local culture', the one hand, and punishtnent on t..iJe other. In all cases, the fe el�good reward signal is then the behaviours so inducrd are everywhere behaviours appropriate to the specific code effected by the euphoria-inducing chemical event which, as Goldstein argues, is an event instituted by each cultural system and its fo unding Origin narrative, In-consequence, where that is probably defi!!tdby the activating of beta-endorphins, whilethe fe e!·bad punishment for all purely organic species, it is the biochemical event of reward and punjshment which signalis induced by the activating of dy norphins, "Vle cantherefore speculate', he continues, directly motivates and is causal of each species' ensemble behaviours, the fundamental dis­ tinction for human forms of life is that it is the culture-representational event which that the reward systems function to drive adaptive behaviors the fo ilov:ing way: They motivates and is causal of (by means of the functioning of the opiate reward/punishment signal 'good' when food is fo und and eaten by a hungry animal, when water is:found and system which it verbally recodes) cur uniquely human behaviours.143 drunk by a thirsty animal. when sexual activity is promised and consummated, when a The issue of the systemically negative representation. of Africa in both the Western threatening situation .is averted. They signal 'bad' when harmful behavior is engaged in or cinematic text as well as in the scholarly text can therefore be recognised as a function of when pain is experienced. These signals become associated •vith the situations in which the enacting of the governing code of symbolic life and death, whi<:his instituting of our they are generated, and they are remembered, 140 present criterionlconception of being Ma� and thereby of the basic principles of under�

standing of our contemporary global culture � that of the West in its bourgeois and Here we approach the central role played by negativclyJpositively marked representations, biocentric conception. While. since in the case of all hwnan forms of life, it is the repre� as i..1. the case of the merstrual blood/tobacco smoke. representations of the Chadian narra­ sentational event (as in the caseof those given rise to bythe Western cinematic text) which tive� or asJn that of the Africa/Europe binarily opposed iconography of\Vestern cinematic gives rise to the biochemical event (whether to that of the beta-endorphin event activated texts, in the artificial motivation systems that drive hu:tru�n behaviours. For if the re,.,-ard by the p0$itive!y marked representation of Man as ioonised in the signifier of the Indo­ system is central to- the genetic motivatio-n system (or GMS), by which the animal 'learns European physiognomy, or that of the dynorphin event activated by thenegatively marked to seek what is beneficial and to avoidwhat isharmful', and, therefore, by means of which, representation of Man's Human Other,'44 as iconised by the Bantu-type physiognomy of the behaviours app ropriate to each species are lawlikely induced -'This delicately regulated peoples ofAfrkan descent), 145 then the callinginto question and countering, by the African system', Goldsteincontinues, 'wasperfected by evolution over millions of years to serve the cinematic text, from Semberte onwards, of these dynorphin-actlvating representatio-ns of survivalof all species, and to let us humans experience pleasure and satisfactionfrcm the Africa and of the peoples of African descent is a calling imo questiott of the guvemingsym­ biologically appropriate behaviors and situations of daily lifo'141 �nevertheless, -as the biolo­ bolic code enacting of Man; and therefore of our present ethno-dass conception of the gist Danielli proposes, in contradiction to Goldsteinin this respect> there is a fundamental human, Man:. itself. Yet, however, a calling into question that has necessarily remained ten� difference in the case of the humans. For not only are the behaviours to be induced here tative and provisional, since having to be carried out "Within the terms of our present intended to be culturally rather than biologically appropriate behaviours, but in the case of 'epistemological locus'; and L� ereby, outside as yet a conceptual ground in whose reference .the humans, Danielli suggests, where the altruistic behaviours essenti-al to sodal cohesion frame or tvorld outlook human 'forms of Hfe', together with their respective governing must be verbally semantically induced, it is discursive processes (i.e. Origin narratives, codes of symboliclif e and thereby of sym_bolic kinship and eusodality, v."i ll be able to exist ideology or beliefsystems) and their respective systems of negatively/positively marked rep� as 'objects ofknowiedge', andto be thereby fullytheoris-able)46 This in very much the same resentations whic.� serve to activate, in culturally relative and r:ecoded terms, the fu nctioning my as biological life itself would only come to exist as an 'object of knowledge' and be of the human biochemical reward and punishment mechanism, thereby motivating our thereby theorisable, as Foucaultpoints out, only within the then new conceptual ground always culture-specific ensemble of behaviours. 14i \Vith the consequence that th� kind of elaborated by the 'fundamental rearrangements ofknowledge' that took place at the end of 'generalised altrui-sm' needed as the integrating mechanism of each social order must be the eighteenth century and during the nineteenth; as a rearrangement which provided the as consistentiy 'rewarded' through the mediation of positively marked representations new episteme or order of knowledge needed to inscribe our present 'figure of Man', as must be the criterion ofsym bolic life, whose no less positive marking functions to induce together with the ethno-class conception of the human as an evolutionarily selected and in the order>s subjects the desire to realisebeing in the terms which alsomakes possible the purely biologised being which, ostensibly, pre-exists the culture and governing code that display ofkin-recognising behaviours towards thosesocialised into subjectivity inthe same can alone inscript and enact it as such a mode of being human. terms as themselves; those>v:ith whom each 1 constitutes a symbolic tt'e. We can therefore put forvmrd the f0llow-inghypotheses: that ruling groups in all human Each such criterion of the nonnal subject can itself be realised and experienced as a cultures, including our own1 are ruling groups to the extent that they embodytheir respec­ value-criterion, however� only through the mediating presence of the negatively marked tive cultures' optimal criterion of being, or code of symbolic life; that therefore the great category which is made to embody the signifter of sym bolic death, in terms that are the transformations in history are always transformations of the code, of what it means to be antithesis of those of normal being; as the category, therefore of deviant Otherness or of human� and, therefore, ofthe poesis ofbeiog and mode ofsymbolic conspecificity, of which Difference fromwhich the bonding principle ofSammess or 'fake' similarity is generated. the code is theorganising principle; a transformation, therefore, of the always symbolically codedmodes of consciousness integrating of our human orders and their fo rms of Hfe. In of "vhich the clergy were the guardians. rn consequence, given that these paradigms were this contex'i: if, as Jacob Pandian notes, with the \'Vest's reinvention, beginning in the six� themselves tauto�ogically based upon the founding premise which legitimated the onto­ teentb century� of its matrix religious identity, Ch ristian, in nvo variant fo rms of Man (the logical and therefore theknowledge-hegemony ofthe clergy - i.e. the premise of mankind's first hybridly religio�secular1 the other purely secular), it was to be the population group of enslavement to Original Sin from whose negath-e consequences only the voluntarily African descent who were to be made into the physical referent of the Human Other to its celibate clergy had been freed -the cognitive closure to which they gave rise was a closure se<:ond axld purelysecular because b.iocentric form, then the systemic negatively rrutrked that was to be brought to an end onlyby the intellectual revolution of humanism. By. that representations of this population group and of its continent of origin, Africa, can now be is, the redprocally ontological and epistemological revolution effected by the lay intelli­ recognised as ones that are a lawlike function of the enacting of our present conception of gentsia of Renaissance Europe against the then hegemonic medieval-Christian and being hu:rnan, of its governing code and ontological rationale. That1 therefore, the 'gallery theocentric con-ception of being, and thereby against their ovm negatively marked repre­ of mirrors' representations of Africa and of African-descended peoples as signifiers of sentation as bearers of the fallen flesh (MBFD) enslaved to Original Sin. As a conception Genetic Dysselectirm/Defe ctivity, and thereby of symbolic deatb in the cinematic and of being that they were to deconstruct, only by means of their revalorised reconception of scholarly texts of the West, are, as lawlikely a function of our enacting of our present lay status, and their narrativisation and invention (beginning with Fico delia Mirandola's 151 evolutionarily selected conception of beinghuman, Man, as the negatively marked repre� Oration on theDi gnityof Ma:n) of 'Man' and its Origin. sentation of the Wo man (as the bearer of the macro�signifier of menstrual blood or of If we note that at the end of the eighteenth and duringthe nineteenth century the Origin symbolic death)) was a function of t.he enacting of one variant of the 'lineage' conception of Man was again renarrativised, this time in thecosmogonk terms of evolution, as that of of being human of traditional polytheistic Africa. a bio-evolutionarily selected being on the model of a natural organism in the reoccupied Further) on the basis of the related hypot.l).esisthat there are laws of culture which func¥ place of Christianity's divinelycreated being in theimage of God, a central recognition can tion for our contemporary order as they have functioned for all human 'forms of life' be made with respect to the �epistemological locus' which came into existence pari passu hitherto, we can now postulate that the systematically negative misrepresentations of Africa ,.,.ith this renarrativised Origin and its biocentric conception of being; as the locus thatwe made by the Western cinematic: text is the lawlike effect of the fa ct that, within the terms have inherited. This recognition, one hinted at byFoucault at theend of his TheOrder of of ourpresent governing code of Man, Africa and allpeoples of African descent, wholly or Things, is that our present disciplinary discourses and their respective systems of posi­ partly) have been made to take the signifying pia;:;:e of the Woman, and thereby made to tively/negatively marked representations are the very practices by means of "vhkh our actua!ise the code of symbolicdeath - of the

It is, therefore� only inrelation to these phenomenological universes of our hwnan 'forms This leads us therefore to the conclusion that there is, today, no misery being exper.i.e..>1ced oflife' (as universes that cannot paradoxicallyexist as 'objects ofknowledge'within the terms by contemporary black Africa and its peoples, nor by the peoples of its diaspora, nor bythe of our present episteme,. itspurely biologised conception of being, and the specific universe peoples who belong to the global and transnational category ofthe jobless and semHobless to which this biocentrk conception gives rise) that we can be enabled to grasp the dimen­ inner-city ghettos and shanty-town archipelagos, togeLher with their prison-extensions, sions of the inventiveness of institutions such as that of initiation/sy:mholicbirth, .as well as that is not due (as is also the ongoing pollution and degradation of the planetary emiron­ of the fOundationalnarratives and their complex religiousbelief systems; the inventiveness, ment)l59 to the following causal factor: that the way we collectively behave on our present therefore, of their respective Words, whether in the cas� of the rnillenniallyexistent poly­ reality) doing so in the terms of a world outlook based on our belief in the purely biologi­ theistic religions such as that of the Dogon peoples, where the Word (Nommo) is conceived cal nature of the human, constitutes the very texture of our own thought, and that, li:kethe of as 'thebeginning of allthings'P5 or in the far later monotheistic religions, fromJudaism's Azande, we too cannot, normally1 think our thought wrong. More precisely, think that our Single Text, to Judaeo-Christianity's Catholic ritual of transubstantiation effected by the thought is true only within the terms of thelocal but now globalised and purely secular 'itari­ priest�s utterance ofword.'l , to the sculpted word of the Islamic Koran, That in addition, we ant culture of the Western bourgeoisie, in the cognitive closute of whose symbolically can be- also enabled to grasp the no lesser degree of inventiveness t.f)at was at work in t.i-te coded system of representations andorder of consciousness we are as enclosed, as the con­ . West's forgingof the secular belief systems or ideologies,beginning with thatof the discourse dition of the enacting of our present poesis of being, Ma n, as were the Azande, as the ofcivic humanism elaborated by thelay revolution of the Renaissance civic humanism, and condition ofthe enacting of theirs; as:would have been, and stillresidually are, the subjects re-enacted asthat of a new fOrm ofbiologicaland/or economichumanism, in the nineteenth of the traditional order of Chad:. as the condition too� of the enacting oftheir ovm. can century; both as the ideo-logies by means of which the West, as a function of its epochal On the basis of theanalogy ofculture always consonant -with itself, we therefore put 'killing' of God, was to replace and/or marginalise allearlier Words, together lv:iththeir reli­ forward the following hypothesis: thatif the governing code of symboliclife and death is a giousconceptions ofbeing human, with its single increasingly homogenisingand secular or transcultural constant, then all our behaviours, including that of our contemporary order Africa� degodded conception, that ofMan. As a conception, however, in the logic of whose 'Word, (and specifically those of thesystemic and negatively marked representing of black or governingcode� its positive/negative system of representations, and thereby of the mem� its human hereditary variation, and indigenous culturalsystems, by the Westerncinematic and dis­ 0ry1 and order of consciousness which they inscript and institute, the continued and scholarly texts), must be as relative to it as, at the physkal level of reality, time of subordination and impoverishment of Africa and its peoples, as \vell as of the are relative to the constant of the speed of light.Further, that because as observers peoples of its I tance as of the govern­ diaspora� is always already prescribed--the cards as dealt within the terms ofits 'officialere­ our social realities we are always already socialised subjects in the terms that we observe, arion story', of evolution, as they would have been dealt for the categorywho embodied the ing code which prescribes the collectivebehaviours instituting ofthe reality (Le. that we cannot negatively marked category of biological or 'raw' life (the MBFD}, 156within the tenns of the then the predicament in whic� we, like the Azande, find ourselves normally, 'trapped traditional 'official creation story' (on the model of Procreationrather thanof evolution) of normallythink that our thought is mong, and must necessarily remain, lfil Chad -of its Word, its mode of memory, of consciousness, of beinghum.an, I in the circularity of a self-referential paradox')100ls a culturally lawlike predicamenL

L This Azande-type predicament was the unstated question that shadowed a 1992 sym­ This, I propose, is where our liminal status, as filmmakers and intellectu�, p�ovid:Sus positlm which dealt with the issue of the relation between mind and brain, consciousness with a cognitive advantage, which parallels, in new terms, that of the lay mtelhgents a of and neurobiology. Against the view of mainstream neuroscientists that the mind is the � Renaissance Europe. In thilt any sustained attempt to fi·ee ourselves from the negatively brain, Jonathan NI:iller proposed that mind or consciousness, while implemented by the marked representations imposed upon us, as the embodied signifiers of Man's most neurobiological processes of the brain, is not itself a property ofthese processes; that we extreme Human Others, by the 'galle-ry of mirrors' of the Viestern cinematic and scholar�y cannot therefore use thesame metho ds by which we have become acquainted with the brain texts,will necessarily impel us towards therealisation of Aline Cesaire' s proposed new sci­ (i.e. the neurosde.zces), to become acquainted v.rith consciousnesS:, ·with the mind. And ence of the Word, as one that, he argued in 1946, was imperatively needed to complete the therefore, with the 'vernacularlanguages ofbelief and desire' through which alone we '"an, natural sciences. If, that is, we are to gain knowledge of our human worlds, specifically of as human, know what iCs like to be us (an L, a we);l62 in effect, through which alone we can the contemporary global order ofreality in which we all now find ourselves, as it,i£;166 rather phenomenologically be in the terms of each order's mode ofsymbolic birth. If, therefore; a than in the behaviour�motivating terms in which it must be knmm by its subJects, as the we deii.'"le consciousness as property of the correlation between the governing code of � indispensable condition of its own stable reproduction as such an order �f re ty. ��wl­ symbolic life and death (as inscribed by the Origin narrntives founding to each human edge, therefore) of the governing codes of symbolic life and death and thexr bas�c pn �c1pl:S 'form of life') and1 therefore, between its positive/negative marked system of representa­ . ofnnderstanding which lawHkely prescribe the ensemble of behaviours, cognitive, m1ag1- tions and the opiate or biochemical re\'tfatd�and-punishment system of the brain. with the native and actional1 by means of which all human orders, including our own, are brought former, the code, always determinant of the states of the latter, then finding a method into existence as living systems; codes which therefore determine. through the cards they by which to get acq uainted '141th consciousness would call for the event of a Second deal. the overall effects, both good and ill, to which each such ensemble of behaviours will Emergence. That is, for a rupture with the cognitive closure and circular self�referentiality lead. of our symbolically coded orders of consciousness whose culture-specific 'directive signs' The concluding thesis here, therefore� is thatit is only such a projected new science (one now function to induce our, thereby still heteronomously ordered, behaviours, Seeing that that Heinz Pag-els was also to call for in 198-8 in his book The Dream of Reason: The Com­ it is only by means of such a new rupture that we c:an,as a species, be empowered to gov­ t67 puter and the Sciences of Complexity) when he suggested that �e sh �uld now set out to ern the goveming codes of symbolic life and death which have hitherto governed and still . breach the barriers between the natural sciences and the humamues m order to put our govern us, thereby necessitating our behaviours inpre-determined and code-specific Yvavs. • narrativelv constructed world and their orders of fe-eling and beHefs under scientific This, in the same way, therefore) as with the singularity of the First Emergeuce, we had, 'as � my')1M descriptio in a new that can provide us with a method b! which to get �cquainted a condition of OUJ;realisation as a ne1-vform oflifel effected that initial rupture with the with the functioning of our symbolically coded orders of consoousness, of mmd, �s the directi·vl� signs of the geneticcodes that necessitate the behaviours of purelyorganic lifej neuroscientists have- found a natural-scientific method by which to become acquamted with this initial rupture then determining that as humans we were to experience ourselves with the processes of functioning ofthe brain. That can thereby make acressible to us the in symbolically coded terms - even where, as in our own case, we verbally defineourselves basic peasants violently uprooted fromthe land, the village of the species' rupture with purely organic life, all other human forms of life were to enact f archipelagos of the jobless, filled with way of life. The very dynamics therefore of the secular their/our poeses of being. together with the self-organising social systerns to which each and from their millennia! agrarian of man's humanityand, therefore, of a remedy based on a such poesis gives rise, In theplace of print, therefote, the cinematic text, and its audiovi­ Western creed's understanding r Material Redemption from Natural Scarcityin imagined as sual spin-off� the texts of TV/video, as- the medium of the new iconography of homo specific notion of freedom, one ,, of the matrix Judaeo-Christian behaviour-motivating notion mlturans as a self-instituting mode ofbeing, 1n the reoccupied ground of hotrw oeconomi­ r the reoccupied place of ' iritual Redemption from Original Sin. cus, and therefore� of the human represented a.od culturally instituted, in ethno�class or human freedom as that of Sp I situation therefore seems to the hero to lie in the utopian Western-bourgeois terms, on the model of a natural organism, The orJy way out of a no-win a challengewhich is carried in thefilm by the semi-mad Black African cinema, by the unique nature ofthe imperative which it confronts of hav­ cliallenge to the creeds ofall three. way as the disillusioned jobless young people of the hero's ing to interface and grapple both with the fundamentallyNeolithic nature of its traditional r mechanic Demba In the same utopianism of Bob Marley's reggae - its musical form indigenous cultures and their fo unding mythical narratives as well as w:ith that of the global generation listen to the messianic the Middle Passage to Africa from the also jobless techno�industrial culture of the contemporary West together with its fo unding Grand ] returned, via technology and reversing - the hero goes off with Demha, riding on the back of his Narrative,1'6 has already prefigured thismutation of the Second Emergence in many of the shanty-towns of the diaspora179 place of traditional \\folof culture called Saaraba; as a elements of its iconography, of its thematks. To take one example. In Amadou Saluum motorbike, in quest of the utopian songs and imagined as a place, free from misery, full of Seck's Saaraba (1988)117,the narrational unit..'>show the hero of thefilm, newly returned to place sung about in traditional day. Demba is shown:, at first, imagining Saaraba in Senegal from his university education in themetropolitan centre, France, having to come I plenty, wl1ere people celebrate every machines do all the work as he has heard happens to grips with a central dilemma. This dilemma is: that none of the three cultural systems technological terms as a land where to lights of the cityat night seen fromthe top of a hill seem and their respective belief systems or creeds (ttvo religious, one secular) that have come to inEurope: the bright glittering However, a car crash wrecks the bike and injures him severely. c9-exist in a now postcolonial reality are capable of resolving thepressing problems of con­ him to be its very epitome. at first angrily turns on the hero, Unable to accept that this is the end of his quest, Demba temporary Senegal These three are that of the indigenous, once autocentric, polytheistic > saving his friend s life I knocking him ove:r a cliff, where he barely hangs from the edge. In religio us system of neolithic agrarian Afri<:a, that of the still theocentrk monotheism of reimagines Saaroba, in terms of a new ethic that Islam, and that ofthe \Vest as the biocentric secuJar creed in whose order ofknowledge the at risk to his O\'ffi,the now dying Demba creeds (two religious;one secular), their particularistic hero hasbeen formally educated. The inability of all three to resolve the ongoing crisis sit­ moves beyond the limits ofall three and respective 'truths'; beyond .lvian, and the dystopk world, uation are shown in a series of episodes. In one episode, one of thecharacters, a herdsma.J., inscriptions ofbeing human7 image.100 finding his livel ihood threatened by the drought which kills offhis rows one hy one, turns made, (because represented) in its his fellow human. If you fight for that,you'll find to the local witchdoctor for help. The drought continues, in spite of the witchdoctor's 'The human', he tells his friend, 'needs .1M efforts; the cows still die. The ultimate remedy then proposed by the witchdoctor1 that he Saaraba'!Utopia ritually sacrificehis daughter, is only averted by the chara.c:terDemba, who stops the herds­ man Just in time by enabling him to recognise the futility and unthinkability of such a remedy, m In the central sequence of episodes, the hero who, as a Muslim has returned Notes s es a Local Knowledge for the definition of contemporary from his studies in Europe m·order to find his �roots' and to turn his back on the machine See Chfford Geertz.' book of s ys taken' {p. 6}. Luc as a culture', •one of the fo rms that life has locally 1 civilisation of the West, is shown as everywhere encountering the chaos that the secular Western culture "local its mode defined this culture as one which, v.>ha tever the changes in Western 'remedy', i.e. its policies of economic development, has brought to Senegal, Beset de Heusch had earlier the continues to be governed by the 'reference point' of on all sides:by the crowd of beggarS; and traurnatised by the spectacle of the large numbers of production and social systems, u ect, and erefore Judaeo*Christian religion and symbology. See for this Luc de Heusch, Sw:riftce in Africa, 17 The central thesis is that we realise ourselves as specific modes of the s bj th p. 206. For the defillition of contemporary Western culture as the purely secularised form -ofthe human, only through the always culturally instituted field of we what itis like to of the matrix Judaeo�Christian religious culture of feud al-Christian Europe, see Sylvia meanings/representations, by meansof which are enabled to experience which Vie are wcialised Wynter, '1492: A New Wodd View', See also her essay, 'Columbus', be a specific subject; that is, throughthe mode of subjectivity into 2 See by the for this term Philip Johnson, Darwin on TriaL to be human. Hence the paradox that while our being human is implemented a property of, 3 ln hls book Hegel, Heidegger, and the Ground of Hi story, pp, 126-7. M, G. Gillespie cites physiological processes of t.fte body, the experience of being human is both each cultural system Heidegger' s point that our contemporary behaviours are driven by our present and relative to, the criteria of being that are instituted and enacted by understanding of man's humanity and our attempt torealise ourselves in the terms of this or 'form of life'. P· 74. uuderst:anding. 18 See David Bohm's intervie\\• v.rith Omni magazine, January 1987 4 MichelFoucault, in his The Order ofThings. 19 See, fur t.�.Avram Goldstein, Addiction: From Biology toDrug Policy. species dassify and 5 While J, G. A. Pocock shows the way inwhich the Renaissance- discourse of civic 20 In his book Neural Darwinism, Gerald Edelman proposes that organic adaptive advantage to humanism redefined the originally religious subj ect of medieval Europe as optimally homo know their environment inthe terms of the behaviours thatare of politic,;s or polrJcai citizen (see his essay 'Chic Humanism and Its Role in Anglo* each species. bility of American Thought' in this collection of essays, Politics, Language. and Time. pp, 80-103, as 21 See Nwachul

9 The Latin title was De orbis Revolutionibus. 28 See, for a discussion of Marx's concept of ideology in this context, Paul Ricreur's essay 10 See, furthis, Amos Funk.enstein, Theology and the Sdentific Imagination, n. 22, p. 29. 'Ideology and Utopia'. Ric;;:eur's extension of the concept of ideology beyond that of folse Con:emporary interpretations of the significance of the Copernicm:i th.esis •'lith respect to consciousnessto that of a 'shared horizon of understanding' which functions as, so to theposition ofthe earth unfailinglyinterpret it in modernterms, laying the emphasis on 511 eak. the template of social organisation, whe.t1 liuked to Nietzsche's concept of world the decentring of earth and therefure of the human. Taken in its ownRenaissance perception as the rule-governed wayby means of which humans know theirreality, humanist terms, however, Copernicus' feat lay in the fact that hebroke down thebinary according to a specific standard of perception (as a bird, for example, knows its reality oppositionbetween the heavens as the reahn of Redeemed Perfection, and the earth as the according to a species�spedfu: standard), is crucial to the hypothesis that I put forward sinful abode of fa llen man, thereby revalorising the latter, and asserting the homogeneity of here.That is, that the phenomenon of consciousness, ofMudimbe's 'memory', which still substanm between the two realms on whose basis the hypothesis of laws of nature was remains undiscovered by neuroscientists, should be seen in the terms of Marx's concept of made possible. See,for this, Kurt Hubner, The Critique of ScientificReason, ideology redefined in Ricceur's terp15. ll Ferdinand Hallyn, ThePoetic Structure of the World and Sy1via Wynter, 'Columbus'. 29 Since I shall be arguing that all huntan orders are born from a founding Origin narrative, 12 Funkenstein, Theology, p. 29, n. 22 and p. 91. memories, whether mythic, theological or histotical, all take their point of departure from 13 See> for this, K. C. Anyanyu, The Studies of Africcm Religions. the conception of a shared origin. This originthen serves to structure the consciousness or 14 ln Black Skins, \.VhiteMasks. Fanon made theproposal that the reflex behavioural aversive mode of mind integrating of the specificorder. responses of his black patients could not be an individualproblem, that besides the 30 See his Order of Things, p. 336. See also Wynter, '1492'. ontogenetic unfolding of the human individual there are also the processes of socialisation 31 See The Invention ofAfrica, p. x, (or sociogeny) by wb-Jch he or she is enclliturated as a subject The response was therefore 32 Ibid., p. ix. pp. 2-1 L due to the terms in which the black is socialised as a subject of the cultural order of the 33 See, for this, Jacob Pandian, Authropology and rhe Wes tern Traditiot-4 West 34 See jean Franyois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition. 15 See Theophile Obenga's essay, tSous-Theme', in whi-ch he defines the history ofAfrka as 35 The film Sa araba was made in Senegal by one of the youngergeneration of directors. coterminoll$ with the emergence of thehuman out of theanimal kingdom. 36 Cited by Gillespie, Hege4 p. 127. 16 Marcel Griaule, Con·versations with Ogotemmeli. 37 Ibid., pp. 126-7. 38 See the statement of purpose that was sent out to participantsby conference organisers. 'In hybddly bios and logos, gene and word, organic and meta organic See:, fot' the that sense' they 'WrOte 'it willbe an explanation of new ground ratherthan the proposal of thematisation of this premise, Syhia Wynter, "The Pope Must Have Been Drunk'. hard sud fust concl usions, and an op<".ning up ofdebate rather than an exercise in making 55 See his Notes ofa Film Director. p. 7. African dnema: Letter of 6 July, p. 2. 56 Ibid., p. 7. 39 See his essay 'Black Spectatorship: Problems ofldentification and Resistance•. in Diawara, 57 The collapse of Communirun, at the end of the l980s, was inseparably linked to the Black A..merican Cinema, pp. 211-20. formulaic degeneration of the aesthetics of social realism under the weight Qf the 40 See Herbert Marshall's Introduction to Sergei Eisenstein's Immoral Memories, p. ix. ideological imperativesof the New Class or Nomenklatura. In a longer version of'The 41 See Michelle Wallace in heres say 'Race, Gender a.11d Psychoanalysis\ p. 257. Pope Must Have Been Drunk' essay I draw the parallels between the belief sys tem of 42 Ibid., p. 260. witchcraft in traditionalagrarian societies and that of Natural Scarcity in our contemporo:ry 43 For Marxism, the issue of consciotl$ness is a superstructural effect of the mode of techno-industrial own. The central parallel or law is that both witd1craft and Natural production; for feminiSni it is an effect of patriarchy. Scarcity {or for that matter the earlier Judaeo-Christian construct of Original Sin} function

44 See hisopen letter to Mauri ce Thorez-Lettre a Maurice Thorez. as 'socially significant causes' (see Evans-Pritchard, Wl"tchcraft, Oracles and Magic) which 45 Diawara, BUukAmerican Cinema, pp. 212-14. aillsfur a specific kind of intervention to be made (Le. 'Witchcraft to be cured by ritual 46 Jb£d., p. 213. VVhere asDlawara makes clear the black�faced villain Gus is racially defined practices1 .Natural Scarcity to be cured by economic policies or remedies): interventions as Other to the white hero and heroine. thatthereby prescribe the behavioural pathways that are to be follmved by the order as the 47 See, for this, Pandian, Anthropologyand the Western Tradition:. pp. 1-.3. condition of its own stable replica tion as a 'form of life'). 48 lJkadike, Black African Cinem.;, p. 32. As Ukadike points out, a central problem 'With African films of the 1980s which deal: 49 The term 'neo-coionialism� was the attempt to come to terms with this fact - if neo­in with traditional African ritual practicesand beliefs such as witchcraft (i.e, films such as Marxist, and thereby still culturally Western, terms- by radical politicians/thinkers such as Idrissa Ouedraogo's Ya aba (1989)) is that wbile it ran be said that these fib:ns are now ;;ikrumah. penetrating the world market, 'there seems to be a movement away from the political use 50 This issue of consci ousness and of its 'prison wall:;' has also been raised in the film Sankofa. of the film medium, whic-h addresses and rcl ates to authentic cultures and P-J stories, toward (1993) by Haile Gerima, but in cultural nationalist terms. Cultural nationalistb ecause a concernvlith fiL'n as: an object of anthropological interest'; in effect) a tendency to Gerima sees the issueas that of a fa lse conscivusness, which needs to be corrected, rather 'employ the same Western ethnographic conventions that have historically worked to emit than of a culture systemic consciousness, which because it is the condition of all our present the understanding of Afr ica's sociocultural fo rmations' {Ukadike, Black Afr ican Cinema 'form oflifu' needsto be transformed, together with the overall system and mode of p. 248). The proposal of a new conceptual ground which sees practices like cthnomedic:ine, subjectivity(one in which we are allen culturated and socialised) that gives rise to this witchcraft and clitoridectomy (a ritual practice centrally portrayed by Sissoko in Fittzan oonsciouSfiess. ( 1990)) as beha:viour�regulating pra ctices that function according to the same laws as does. 51 See, for this, Da,.id Mayer, Etsenstein's Potemkin. for example, thee thno-discipline of economics and its 'soci ally significant cause' of 52 AsE isenstein \-v:rote in his autobiography, lmmoml lvfemories. 'The boy from Riga Natural Scarcity (in ther eoccupied places of OriginalSin), to motivate our contemporary became fa mous at twentyseven. Douglas Fairbanks and Mary� Pickford came to MO$COW to ensembie of behaviours, would enable African fibnmakers to deal v;ith those issues without shake by the hand the boy from Riga who had made Battleship Potemkin' (p. 8). Eisenstein any risk of their being re -ceived by mass spectator s as 'exoti.c' ethnographic material tells in his autobiography also of how powerfullythe illm Battleship Potemkin relevant only to the West:s Others; would therefore avoid the dangerous trap of magical resonated with members of the: working dasses (i.e. of the proletariat) all overthe world realism into which Latin American fi ction fe ll

(p. 65): 58 In his autobiogr aphy, Eisenstein makes it dear that fo:r hirn the 'world outlook' of Communism was the world outlook alone able to ochieve what he calledthe 'single idea, And then to reap the fruits of your fame: To beinvited to Buenos Aires for a series oflectures, � To be suddenly reoognised in the remote silver mines ofthe Sierra Madre, where the film \'laS si.t' lgle theme, and single subject' of his work that of the 'achievement of (human} unity', shown tot."tc Mexican workers. To be embraced by unkno'Wn, wonderful people in the Immoral Me mories, p. 259. The coilapse and disintegration of the Soviet Union \Vas, workers' district ofLiCge, where they screened the film in secret To hear Alvarez del Vayo's however, to disprove this hope. account ofhow, back in the time of the monarchy, he himself had sneaked a print of Potemkin 59 Benjamin Barber,Jihad vs. Me World (New York: Random House/Times Books, 1995). into Spain for a showing in Madrid. Suddenly to learn in some Parisian cafe, where you 60 My central proposal in the address is that although our biological makeup is the happen to share a little marble table with two da;;k-skinned Sorbonne students from the East, 'condition' of our being human (and therefore the nature or bios aspect of our being} 'your name very well known .. that is to us :in . Java'l Ox. on leaving some little garish we e.xperience ourselves ashuman only in the verbally inscribed pattof our cultures, roadhouse, to receive a warm handshake from a Negro waiter in recognition of what you have v.Cndahlejobless having to resort to crime as dyssdection for low IQ. their avenue of'advancement'. The prison system has therefore reoccupied the outsider 65 For Zygmu."lt Bauman's concept of ConceptualOt herness,see his Modernito; and the place of the earlier segregated black world. Holocaust. 80 A global pattern has begun t-o emerge, whether in the case of the death squads in Brazil in 66 See1 for a furtl1er development of this concept, my essay 'Is Development a Purely the case of street children {see Gilberta Dimenstein's War on Children)) or in the USA with Empirical C-O ncept?' the high rate of lntra-blacl< male violence and murder, as well as the high rate of police 67 See Herrnstein and Murray, TheBell Curve, pp. 34S-6S bmtality resulting in the death of suspectstaken into custody. 68 Within the ideological terms of feminist theory, whic.h sees gender as an aculturo.lconcept, 81 See his I Writ e 'What I Like. it cannot be recognised that clitoridectomyis one form of the construction of gender� just as 82 That is the consciowmess of altetitytoMan as a conception of being, and 'form of life ', as the keeping of middle-class white- women to the role of homemaker {untilthe revolt of thatof the working classis, inthe Marxian paradigm, that of alterity to the employer and fe minism) is the contemporary bourgeois form of this construction of gender, of being. investor dass within the terms of an economic mode of productionas thedeterminant Hence the paradox ofSissoko's otherwise excellent filmFinzan which remains, in this factor. Here the conception of being, in a sense the politics of being; replaces themode of respect, entrapped in feminist idoologywhich defines clitoridectomy in terms of feminist production as the tktermitut.ntfactor. Since ruling groups are legitimated asruling groups to culture as 'genital mutilation'. This is not a plea for the continuation of this pra<:tice now the extent that they embody their respective social order's criterion ofbeing- and: therefore thatwe live in quite another world; rather both clitoridectomy and t."he contemporary of behaving. Thi.

Ukadike, Black African Cinema, pp, 271-5 for a discussion of this issue. We are not persuaded thatwhen looked at carefully the specific object of social sciences is the 69 See Jacques Le Goff, The l\1edievai Imagination. study of one universalh uman nature given a priori, because we do not know if such a human 70 See the title and theme of his TheWretched of the Earth. :nature exists concretely somewhere. It may be that human nature (of human being ingeneral, 71 Blumenberg, Th e Legitimacy of the Modem Age, p, 221, points out rhat while before the natural human being, etc.) is a theoretical fiction of generalphilooophy, or then, the activist West's institution of the modem age, htunan beings had alv-lays knov.n material want, this generalisation of a limited concrete experience. want had nevet before thi<> been 'generalised to reality as a whole'.. This generalisationwas Muclimhe gives the citation as Psychiatrie dynamiqueAfricaine {Paris: Payol, 1977), to be fully realised, of course, with Ricardo's construct of Natural Scarcity on whose pp. 250-5. rhetorical a priori the discipline of economics was to be based. 85 Miller, 'Trouble in Mind' andChalmers, 'The Puzzle'. 72 In his essay 'The Toad in the Garden', p. 274. 86 In The Astonishing Hypothesis. 73 In TheWreuhed of th e Earth, p. 274. 87 In his The Invention of Africa, p. x. 74 Marxismof course saw poverty only as :m effect of the exploitation of the labour*power of 88 See Antonio T. de Nicholas, 'Notes on theBiology of Religion'. the workingclasses, and therefore consistently defined the Poor asthe liminal or Other 89 See his book Exchange: Concepts in Social Thought(Min.neapolis, MN: University of category to the working classes, thereby accepting the bourgeois criterion of optimal MinnesotaPress, 1992). being/behaving as that of breadwinner/bread-winning. Other recent-isms, furninisms. 90 The concept that the oniy life that humans live is ourrepresented symbolic life is Peter multic.ulturalisms, gay liberationisrn, ignore the issueboth of the poor and of the sodal Wincll's, See his essay 'Understanding a Primitive Society'. 5U.bordination of the workingclass. Onlyliberation theology theorywith its preferential 91 Foucault; The Order of Things. option for the poor thesis and Fanon's polemic on behalf of the iumpen Le. the 92 Hans Blumenberganalyses the implication of these theocentrk strategies, i.e. strategies rural/shanty-tovm afro proletariat of theThird World, have attempted to deal with poverty based on the premise of an Aristotelianised Unmoved Mover God, who had created the as an issue in itself. world and mankind purely for thesake ofHls own Glory, rather than -wi th any special 75 See Bauman's Legislators a.n.d Intetpreters. consideration for man. This God could therefore arbitrarily intexvene to alterhis creation, 76 Inhis prescient and propheticseries of lectures published as Notes on the Dialectic.s, pp. ensuring that humans could not depend upon the regularities of functioning of nature in 129-36, 211-23. order to know the rules according to which nature functions. The intellectual revolution of 77 Ibid., pp. 129-36. hwnanism wasto challenge and change this conception of God and ofhis non-caring 78 The point here isthat the conception of the 'freedom pa-ckage' ofMaterial Redemption relation to an ostensibly contingent/mankind. See his The Leg itimacy. See also VYynter, thenfunctions, in theterms of artificial intelligence theorists, as the supraordinate goal 'Colun1b-us'. r l 93 Ceddo was made in 1976. 124 Grassi, op. cit.• p. lOS. 94 The premise here is that 'consciousness• is generated from each order's governing self­ I 125 See Funkenstein, Theo logy, n. 22, p. 29 and p. 9L conception or governing code, See, for a conception of the specificity of the reflexive 126 See his t, and stillhegemonically 133 'The etiology ofthe reflex self�aversion displayed by Fanon's patients which led him to middle-dass, role. I have adapted. the pun, sub/version, from Lemuel Johnson's essay. 'A� the hypothesis that human subjects are always socialised (sociogenetic) rather than ben& (Re)Calling the Body in( to) Question'. purely ontogenetic or biological subjects, isto befo und here. See hisBlack Skins, lVhite Pfaff, p. f 99 The Cinema, 43. Masks. 100 t)kadike, Black African Cinema., p. 3. " 134 A recent book b}r Judy Grahn, Blood, Bread. and Roses, bears out this hypothesis with 101 Ibid. l respect to the central role ofthe macro� representation of menstrual blood in human 102 SeeMudimbe, The Invention. of Afr ica. cultures. 103 Here again the indk"' tinguishability of apes and African nativesis subtly yet systemically I 135 Harold Mo.rowit:t, ln his essay, 'Balancing Species Preservation', insisted upon. ,. 136 The term is from Phillip Johnson's Darwin on TriaL 104 Made in 1982. See, for a discussion of this, Ukadike, Black Afr iam Cinema, pp. 54-7, r 137 Lieberman, Uniquely Human.. 1-05 Published by Monthly Review Press, New York, 1972, trans. Joan Pinkham. I 138 See, for a discussi<:m of both the traditional and the contemporary identity systems of 106 Published by Pantheon Books, 1978. Rwanda and Burundi, by means of whkh the Tutsis have asserted t.i).eir dominance over 107 See Anyanyu, The Studies ofAf rican Religions. t the Hutus, Rene Lemarchand, Rwanda and Burundi. 108 Ibid f' 139 See ibid., p. 155, for his discussion of the role of the Karinga drum in the assertion of the 109 See Mi.Jdimbe. The Invention of Africa. ! traditional dominance of the Tutsis over the Hutus. , 110 See his The Order of Things. Se-e also, for this, Gary Gutting s Michel Foucault's l 140 Goldstein, Addiction. A.rchaeology. I 141 Ibid. 111 ln Obenga, unpublished paper. 142 In his essay, 'Alt."Uism'. 112 See his The Creative Explosion. 143 See in this context the book by Wade Davis, Passage of Darknes$. Davis's analysis 1!3 In Obenga, unpublished paper. of the functioning of zombification as a sanction system by the Biz.erta secret sodety of 114 That i;;, of the optimal subjecta,s political citizen whose first loyalty is to the state in its Vodun, and his discovery of the chemical substances used by the houngans to effect post-medieval conception. See, for this,Pocock, 'Civic Hmnanism in Anglo-American zombification, provides a scientifi.: rather than ideo-ethnographic: insight into the Thought' in his Politics, Language, and Time, pp. 85-95. traditional cultures and religions of Africa fromw} .ich Vodun is derived. Not only does it 115 ln Obenga,. unpublished paper. bear out Basil Davidson's thesis thatAfrican religiom should be seen as the embodiment 116 In his book Rhetoric as Phik>sophy, pp. 104-10. of the behavioural norms ·which had facilitated the expansion of black peoples across the 117 Ibid., p. llO. African continent but he makes a critical point that enables us to identify the parallel 118 See Donald T. Campbell, 'On the Genetics ofAltruism' and "The Two Distinct Routes function of the systemica.l!y negatively marked representations in the cinematic and beyond Kin Selection toUltra-sodality: Implications for the Humanities and Social S<:holarly texts of the West-this point is that it is not the chemical event which gives Sciences�, in The Nature ofPro-5odal Developmimt: Interdisciplinary Theories and rise to the phenomenon of zombificatlon but the cultu�;aJ belief system (in eff-ect the Strategies, ed, Diane L, Bridgman (New York: Academk Press, 1982). representation E.....ent) which activates thefunctioning of thebiochemical event 119 See for this Campbell. See also Philip Wright, Three Scientists, (pp. 244-

. I 76 SYMBOLIC NARRATiVES ! AFRICAN CINEMA

Ukadike, Nwadmkwu Frank. Black African Cinema (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994}.

Wallace, Michele. 1Race, Gender and Psychoanalysis in Forties Film: Lost Boundaries� Home of the Brave, The Quiet One', in Black American Cinema, ed. M. Dia;;vara (New York: Part Tw o Routledge, 1993). Wallerstein, Immanucl. The Modern World Sys tem: Capitalist Agriculture and the Originsof the Arguments World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (london: A<:ademicPress) !974). Whitney, M. L. and Dermott Hussey. Bob lvfarley: Reggae King of the Wo rld (Kingston, Tarnaica: Kingston Publishers, 1989). Winch, Peter. 'Understanding a Primitive Society\ American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. I: 307-24. No further detailsavailable. Wright, Philip. Three Scientists and Their Gods: Looking for Me aning in an Age ofInf ormation (New York: Times Book'l, 19-88). Wynter, Sylvia. 'Co-lumbus and the Poetics of the Propter Nos�, in Discovering Columbus1 ed, D. Kadir, Annals ofSchola-rshi p,· An International Quarterly in theHuma-nities and Scie:nces, vol. 8, no. 2 (Detroit, IL: VVayne State University Press1 1992}. �-�'1492: ANew World View', inRace, Discourse, and the Origins oj tfteAmerU:as, ed. V. L Hyatt et aL (Washington: Smithsonian Press, 1995). --·' "Genital Mutilaton" or "Symbolic Birth"? Female Circumcision, Lost Origins, and the Arultunilism of Feminist/Western Thought', in Colloquium; Bridging Society, C-ulture and Lawin Case We stern Lnw Review1 vol 47, no. 21 wintei 1997: 501-52, --'Is Development a Purely Empirical Concept? Or Is It also Teleological? A Perspective from "we the underdeveloped'' ', in Prospects for Recovery rmd Sustainable Development in Africa, ed. Y.A. Yansane (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press� 1996). -·-'The Pope Must Have BeenDrunk, 'rhe King of Castile a Madman: Culture as Actuality and the Caribbean Rethinking Modernity', in The Reordering �f Culture: Lati."tl America, the Caribbean, and Canada in the Hood, ed. Alvina Ruprecht and Cecilia Taiana (Ottawa. Ontario: Carleton University Press, 1995).

--'Rethinking "Aesthetics": Notestov.wds a Deciphering Practice', in Ex�ilcs: Essays on Caribbean Cinema, ed. Mhye Cham (Trenton, NJ: African World Press, 1992).