Probing Self-Interacting Warm Dark Matter via Matter Power Spectrum
Daniel Gift [email protected] Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics Stony Brook University
With Daniel Egana-Ugrinovic (Perimeter Institute) and Rouven Essig (YITP, SBU) Dark Matter: “Nightmare Scenario”
● Lots of efforts to measure: directly, indirectly, collider
● If it doesn’t interact with the Standard Model: How and what can we learn about Dark Matter (DM)? ● Dynamics of dark sector can be probed by measurements of structure formation
2 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Structure in the Universe
● Universe expands, size is measured by scale factor a;
a {
● Energy density dominated initially by radiation, later by matter
● Primordial fluctuations in otherwise homogeneous universe evolve ○ Overdensities draw in more matter, interactions, etc.
3 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Matter Power Spectrum
● How big are the perturbations of various sizes today? ● Smallest sizes → biggest k values ● Shape tells us something about DM dynamics
4 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Self-interacting Dark Matter
● Free streaming: any particle with a velocity will travel unless interrupted ● Self-scattering interrupts free-streaming
● Decouples when interaction rate (횪2→2) drops below Hubble expansion rate:
Happens at scale factor a = a dec
5 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Self-interacting Dark Matter
● Free streaming: any particle with a velocity will travel unless interrupted ● Self-scattering interrupts free-streaming
● Decouples when interaction rate (횪2→2) drops below Hubble expansion rate:
Happens at scale factor a = a dec
6 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Self-interactions and Acoustic Oscillations
● Self interactions → pressure
● Pressure waves drive out matter from overdensity at speed of sound
● Distance travelled by pressure wave = sound horizon (rs)
○ Perturbations suppressed at scales < rs
7 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Suppression scales
● aNR: Scale factor when DM becomes non-relativistic
● Sound horizon depends mostly on aNR, but also partly on interaction strength
(through adec)
8 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Excluded by halo shape/Bullet Cluster
1
/g) 2
Earlier decoupling means smaller sound horizon→ less suppression compared σ/m (cm Free to CDM streaming
~keV mass 9 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] KeV-scale Warm Dark Matter (WDM)
● All particles with velocity will free-stream ○ Travel furthest when relativistic
10 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] KeV-scale Warm Dark Matter (WDM)
● All particles with velocity will free-stream ○ Travel furthest when relativistic ● Small overdensities smooth out
11 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] KeV-scale Warm Dark Matter (WDM)
● All particles with velocity will free-stream ○ Travel furthest when relativistic ● Small overdensities smooth out
12 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] KeV-scale Warm Dark Matter (WDM)
● All particles with velocity will free-stream ○ Travel furthest when relativistic ● Small overdensities smooth out ● DM won’t have overdensities on scales below free streaming length
13 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Free Streaming Suppression
14 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] High-k Power Spectrum
15 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Big Picture
DM acoustic DM scattering freezes DM free-streams oscillations out, DM begins free-streaming
? DM becomes ? non-relativistic
16 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Excluded by halo shape/Bullet Cluster
1 Acoustic
oscillations /g) 2 σ/m (cm Free streaming
mass 17 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Preliminary Results
Excluded by halo shape/Bullet Cluster
Preliminary
18 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Conclusions
● Self-Interactions affect WDM bounds ● Acoustic Oscillations and Free Streaming suppress structure formation ● Understanding the interplay of the two will help set more robust bounds ● Current work is making more precise the bounds given by Boltzmann evolver code
19 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Thank You!
Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Backups aNR
● Redshift at which DM becomes non-relativistic: TDM = m
● Relationship between aNR and m depends on specific model
● ξ = TSM/TDM at TDM > m
22 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Evolution of Perturbations
● During radiation domination:
● During matter domination:
● If perturbations suppressed during matter domination, will affect what we see
today
23 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Sample model
● Scalar:
DM DM
DM DM 24 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Excluded by halo shape/Bullet Cluster
1
Structure suppressed mostly by acoustic oscillations /g) 2
Structure suppressed first by acoustic oscillations and later by free streaming σ/m (cm
Structure suppressed mostly by free streaming a NR 25 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected] Preliminary Results
Excluded by halo shape/Bullet Cluster
Preliminary
26 Daniel Gift Phenomenology 2020 [email protected]