DOCSLIB.ORG

Inside Layout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

covers 5/5/04 10:26 AM Page 1 Land Areas oftheNationalForestSystem—2003USDALand ForestService United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the Forest Service National Forest FS-383 January 2004 System As of September 2003 covers 5/5/04 10:26 AM Page 2 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the Forest Service National Forest FS-383 January 2004 System As of September 2003 Table of Contents Page(s) Definitions of Terms . .i National Forest System Special Designated Areas Abbreviations Used in this Pamphlet . .ii National Forest System Map . .iv-v Table 1-National and Regional Areas Summary . .1 Table 2-Regional Areas Summary . .2-3 Table 3-Areas by Region . .4-14 Table 4-Areas by State . .15-43 Table 5-Areas in Multiple States . .44-47 Table 6-Areas by State, Congressional Districts, and Counties . .48-92 Special Designated Areas Table 7-National Wilderness Areas by State . .93-123 Table 8-National Wilderness Areas in Multiple States . .124-126 Table 9-National Wilderness Areas Summary . .127 Table 10-National Primitive Areas by State . .128 Table 11-National Scenic-Research Areas by State . .128 Table 12-National Scenic Areas by State . .129 Table 13-National Wild, Scenic, and Recreation Rivers by State . .130-140 Table 14-National Wild, Scenic, and Recreation Rivers in Multiple States . .141 Table 15-National Recreation Areas by State . .142-144 Table 16-National Recreation Areas in Multiple States . .145 Table 17-National Game Refuges and Wildlife Preserves by State . .146-147 Definitions of Terms Table 18-National Monument Areas by State . .148 National Forest System—A nationally significant system of Federally owned Table 19-National Volcanic Monument Areas by State . .148 units of forest, range, and related land consisting of national forests, purchase units, national grasslands, land utilization project areas, experimental forest areas, Table 20-National Historic Areas by State . .149 experimental range areas, designated experimental areas, other land areas, water areas, and interests in lands that are administered by the USDA Forest Service or Table 21-National Forest Lands-Annual Acreage . .150-151 designated for administration through the Forest Service. Also see Section 11 of Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-378, Table 22-Protection Areas by State . .152 88 Stat. 476, 16 U.S.C. 1609) Table 23-Special Management Areas by State . .152 National Forest—A unit formally established and permanently set aside and reserved for National Forest purposes. Table 24-National Botanical Areas by State . .152 Purchase Unit—A unit designated by the Secretary of Agriculture or previously Table 25-Recreation Management Areas by State . .153 approved by the National Forest Reservation Commission for purposes of Weeks Law acquisition. Table 26-Scenic Recreation Areas by State . .153 National Grassland—A unit designated by the Secretary of Agriculture and permanently held by the Department of Agriculture under Title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act. Land Utilization Project—A unit designated by the Secretary of Agriculture for conservation and utilization under Title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act. Research and Experimental Area—A unit reserved and dedicated by the Secretary of Agriculture for forest or range research and experimentation. Other Area—An area administered by the Forest Service that is not included in one of the above groups. Region—A large geographic area containing units of the National Forest System. i National Forest System National Botanical Areas—Areas that contain plant specimens, plant groups, or Special Designated Areas plant communities that are significant because of their form, color, occurrence, habitat, location, life history, arrangement, ecology, rarity, or other features. National Forest Wilderness Areas—Areas designated by Congress as a part of Recreation Management Areas—Areas established by Congress to conserve, the National Wilderness Preservation System. protect, and enhance scenic, wildlife, recreational, and other natural resource values. National Forest Primitive Areas—Areas designated by the Chief of the USDA Scenic Recreation Areas—Areas established by Congress to protect and provide Forest Service as primitive areas. They are administered in the same manner as enhancement of natural, scenic, recreation, historic, and cultural resources. national wilderness areas, pending studies to determine suitability as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Abbreviations used in this booklet: National Wild and Scenic River Areas—Areas designated by Congress as part of the National Wild and Scenic River System. NF National Forest NFS National Forest System National Recreation Areas—Areas established by Congress for the purpose of PU Purchase Unit assuring and implementing the protection and management of public outdoor NGL National Grassland recreation opportunities. LUP Land Utilization Project EF Experimental Forest National Scenic-Research Area—Areas established by Congress to provide use ER Experimental Range and enjoyment of certain ocean headlands and to insure protection and encourage EA Experimental Area the study of the area for research and scientific purposes. OTH Other Area NP National Preserve National Game Refuges and Wildlife Preserve Areas—Areas designated by Presidential Proclamation or by Congress for the protection of wildlife. National Monument Areas—Areas including historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest, declared by Proclamation or by Congress as national monuments. National Preserves—An area established by Congress to protect and preserve scientific, scenic, geologic, watershed, fish, wildlife, historic, cultural, and recreational values, and to provide for multiple use and sustained yield of renewable resources. Protection Areas—Areas set aside by Congress for protection during revision of a management plan. Special Management Areas—Areas established by Congress to maintain existing wilderness characteristics during consideration for potential inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. ii iii U.S. Department of Agriculture FOREST SERVICE Olympic Okanogan Mt. Kootenai Baker Wenatchee Kaniksu Snoqualmie Deschutes Hiawatha Challis Green Mountain inema W Modoc Bridger Teton Trinity cino o Cache Plumas end M Tahoe Wasatch NEWTOWN SQUARE VALLEJO ALBANY Stanislaus White River WASHINGTON Humboldt DC Sierra UncompahgreGunnison Hoosier Mark Twain Daniel Boone San Juan Mark Twain Carson Prescott Cleveland Nantahala Holly Springs Tombigbee Based on a map prepared by the Geospatial Service and Technology Center, Salt Lake City, Coronado UT. Map features generalized from 1:2,000,000 U.S. Geological Survey and USDA Forest MISSISSIPPI Service digital data. Slightly revised April 2002. DeSoto Homochitto NOTE: One or more national forests, grasslands, or other divisions protrayed on this map may be managed under a joint administrative unit. RIO PIEDRAS Tongass Caribbean National Headquarters International Institute of Tropical Forestry Research Station Headquarters Table 1—National and Regional Areas Summary No. of Gross NFS Other Area Kind Units Acreage Acreage Acreage National Totals National Forests 155 225,455,289 187,860,217 37,595,072 Purchase Units 60 2,241,287 359,351 1,881,936 National Grasslands 20 4,264,663 3,839,167 425,496 Land Utilization Projects 6 1,876 1,876 0 Research and 20 73,154 64,871 8,283 Experimental Areas Other Areas 34 296,406 295,814 592 National Preserves 1 89,716 89,716 0 Totals 296 232,422,391 192,511,012 39,911,379 Western Regional Totals (Regions 1 through 6) National Forests 101 156,005,802 141,121,533 14,884,269 Purchase Units 19 164,239 12,244 151,995 National Grasslands 18 4,080,564 3,800,985 279,579 Land Utilization Projects 4 1,834 1,834 0 Research and 6 60,598 60,598 0 Experimental Areas Other Areas 28 109,023 108,431 592 National Preserves 1 89,716 89,716 0 Totals 177 160,511,776 145,195,341 15,316,435 Eastern Regional Totals (Regions 8 and 9) National Forests 52 45,093,309 24,757,779 20,335,530 Purchase Units 41 2,077,048 347,107 1,729,941 National Grasslands 2 184,099 38,182 145,917 Land Utilization Projects 2 42 42 0 Research and 14 12,556 4,273 8,283 Experimental Areas Other Areas 6 187,383 187,383 0 Totals 117 47,554,437 25,334,766 22,219,671 Alaska Region Totals (Region 10) National Forests 2 24,356,178 21,980,905 2,375,273 Totals 2 24,356,178 21,980,905 2,375,273 1 Table 2—Regional Areas Summary Table 2—Regional Areas Summary (Continued) No. of Gross NFS Other No. of Gross NFS Other Area Kind Units Acreage Acreage Acreage Area Kind Units Acreage Acreage Acreage Northern Region (1) Pacific Northwest Region (6) National
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan

    Introduction to the Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan

    SOUTHERN BLUE RIDGE ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN Summary and Implementation Document March 2000 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY and the SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN FOREST COALITION Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan Summary and Implementation Document Citation: The Nature Conservancy and Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition. 2000. Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan: Summary and Implementation Document. The Nature Conservancy: Durham, North Carolina. This document was produced in partnership by the following three conservation organizations: The Nature Conservancy is a nonprofit conservation organization with the mission to preserve plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition is a nonprofit organization that works to preserve, protect, and pass on the irreplaceable heritage of the region’s National Forests and mountain landscapes. The Association for Biodiversity Information is an organization dedicated to providing information for protecting the diversity of life on Earth. ABI is an independent nonprofit organization created in collaboration with the Network of Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation Data Centers and The Nature Conservancy, and is a leading source of reliable information on species and ecosystems for use in conservation and land use planning. Photocredits: Robert D. Sutter, The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This first iteration of an ecoregional plan for the Southern Blue Ridge is a compendium of hypotheses on how to conserve species nearest extinction, rare and common natural communities and the rich and diverse biodiversity in the ecoregion. The plan identifies a portfolio of sites that is a vision for conservation action, enabling practitioners to set priorities among sites and develop site-specific and multi-site conservation strategies.
  • Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning

    Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning

    Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning July 20, 2010 Prepared by the Northwest Georgia Regional Commission with funding from The Georgia Department of Community Affairs 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Acknowledgements: Portions of this document derive from the Inventory and Assessment for the 2004 Coosa-North Georgia Joint Regional Comprehensive Plan, prepared by the Coosa Valley Regional Development Center and the North Georgia Regional Development Center. The descriptions and maps of the Environmental Corridors are based on the Georgia Department of Natural Resources’ 1976 “Environmental Corridor Study.” 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Description of Region III. Why Conserve? IV. Threats V. Visions and Goals VI. Measures in Place VII. Conservation Tools VIII. Funding Sources IX. Potential Partners X. Incentives XI. Existing Public Resources XII. Planning and Implementation Strategies XIII. Greenways Concept Map XIV. Model for Greenspace Development Guidelines XV. Map Appendix 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Introduction The dispersal of population into once remote and rural areas has caused land consumption to soar. According to the U.S. Bureau of Census Data on Urbanized Areas, from 1970 to 1990, Atlanta experienced a 161.3% growth in total land area, while Chattanooga showed an expansion of 120.1%. These two metro areas are linked by Interstate 75, and as they grow together, they will consume much unprotected land in the fifteen-county region. While population growth is a factor in land consumption, development patterns are as important. From 1970 to 1990, the population of Detroit decreased by 7%, while sprawl increased by 28%.
  • Major Tectonic Features Arid Struc the Greenville Quadrangle

    Major Tectonic Features Arid Struc the Greenville Quadrangle

    Major Tectonic Features arid Struc Elemerats in the Northwest r ,£1 ,'f the Greenville Quadrangle, I . .. I • '· Major Tectonic Features and Structural Elements in the Northwest Part of The Greenville Quadrangle, Georgia By ARTHUR E. NELSON A study of major structural features, tectonic fabrics, and fold analyses of polydeformed metamorphic rocks comprising three major thrust sheets that together form a large part of the southern Appalachian Mountains in northeast Georgia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1643 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1985 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nelson, Arthur E. (Arthur Edward), 1922- Major tectonic features and structural elements in the northwest part of the Greenville quadrangle, Ga. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1643) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1643 1. Geology-Georgia-Greenville region. 2. Geology, structural. I. Title. II. Series: Geological Survey bulletin; 1643. QE75.B9 no. 1643 557.3 s [557.58'455] 85-600011 [QE102.G73] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Previous work 1 General geology 1 Great Smoky thrust sheet 2 Hayesville thrust sheet 2 Mafic and ultramafic rocks 3 Helen-Coweeta terrane 4 Metamorphism 4 Structural geology 5 Faults, joints, and lineament trends 5 Folding and related deformation 6 Fold analyses 12 Area I 12 Area II 12 Area III 12 Area IV 14 Area V 14 The northwest subdivision 14 Helen-Coweeta terrane 14 East part of Hayesville sheet 16 Brasstown Bald window 16 Crenulation cleavage (S3) 16 F J fold analysis 18 Summary and conclusions 18 References cited 21 FIGURES 1.
  • SWAP 2015 Report

    SWAP 2015 Report

    STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN September 2015 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES DIVISION Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Recommended reference: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 2015. Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Recommended reference for appendices: Author, A.A., & Author, B.B. Year. Title of Appendix. In Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan (pages of appendix). Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Cover photo credit & description: Photo by Shan Cammack, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Interagency Burn Team in Action! Growing season burn on May 7, 2015 at The Nature Conservancy’s Broxton Rocks Preserve. Zach Wood of The Orianne Society conducting ignition. i Table&of&Contents& Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv! Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ x! I. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1! A Plan to Protect Georgia’s Biological Diversity ....................................................... 1! Essential Elements of a State Wildlife Action Plan .................................................... 2! Species of Greatest Conservation Need ...................................................................... 3! Scales of Biological Diversity
  • UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director

    UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 635 R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHEE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Previous publication.................................................. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 7 Atlanta, Baxley, Brunswick, Cochran, Dalton, Eastman, Everett, For- syth, Gresston, Jackson, Jesup, Lumber City, McDonough, McRae, Macon, Marietta, Ringgold, Rome, Scotland, Surrency, and Tobesofkee quadrangles (Appling, Bibb, Butts, Clayton, Cobb, Coffee, Dodge, Floyd, Fulton, Glynn, Gordon, Henry, Monroe, Pauldiug, Polk, Pulaski, Telfair, Twiggs, Wayne, and Whitfield counties)...................... 7 Ringgold quadrangle (Dade County)................................... 14 Macon and Meriwether quadrangles (Baldwin, Bibb, and Jones counties) . 15 Primary leveling........................................................... 16 Dahlonega, Dalton, and Ellijay quadrangles (Fannin, Gilmer, Habersham, Lumpkin, Murray, Rabun, Towns, Union, White, and
  • Appendix D Wild and Scenic Rivers

    Appendix D Wild and Scenic Rivers

    CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS APPENDIX D WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS The Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR) Act of 1968 established the National WSR System. The Rivers analyzed in this Appendix are being assessed, through the Forest planning process, as being suitable for designation as part of the National WSR System. The rivers were identified by nomination by the public, by aquatic professionals, and by the Forest’s Ranger Districts. Eighty-eight streams were suggested in the beginning. (See FSH 1909.12 – Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, Chapter 8 – Wild and Scenic River Evaluation.) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT D-1 APPENDIX D CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS Table D- 1. Rivers Suggested for WSR Evaluation District ID River Quads Armuchee 5/8/96 1100 Armuchee Creek (East) Sugar Valley, Subligna 1200 Johns Creek Sugar Valley 1300 Swamp Creek Villanow 1400 Stover Creek Villanow Brasstown 4100 Cooper Creek Mulky Gap, Coosa Bald, Gap 4110 Sea Creek Mulky Gap 4200 Dicks Creek/Blood Mountain Creek Neels Gap 4210 Mulky Creek (Toccoa) Mulky Gap 4300 Nottely River Most on Private Land 4310 West Wolf Creek Coosa Bald 4320 Wolf Creek Coosa Bald 4400 Hiwassee River Most on Private Land 4411 Swallow Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4411a Dismal Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4420 Cynth Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4431 Silas Branch (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4440 Corbin Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4441 Brier Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4450 High Shoals Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain Chattooga. 4/18/96 6100 Chattahoochee River Jacks
  • September 2011  Volume 86 Number 5 September 2011

    September 2011  Volume 86 Number 5 September 2011

    BotSoc News, September 2011 1 Volume 86 Number 5 September 2011 Georgia Botanical Society Brief Notes from the Botanical World IN THIS ISSUE: USPS Honors Botanist Asa Gray Weakley’s Flora Updated Society News – Asa Gray (1810-1888) is one of four scientists A new version of Alan S. Weakley’s Flora of p2 honored by the US Postal Service in their 2011 the Southern and Mid-Atlantic States (May American Scientists (Forever®) stamps. Gray, 2011) has coverage for the states of Alabama, one of the nation’s first professional botanists, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mis- Book Review- advanced the specialized field of plant geography sissippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ten- p3 and became the principal American advocate of nessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District evolutionary theory in the mid-nineteenth cen- of Columbia, and parts of Florida (northern Discoveries - tury. The stamp art features illustrations of plants and Panhandle counties), Louisiana (Florida p4 studied by Gray and the words "Shortia galacifo- Parishes), and New Jersey (Coastal Plain lia" in Gray’s handwriting. counties). Arrangement of families (and genera within Upcoming Take the quiz! families, increasingly) is Field Trips – Lisa Samuelson, Mike Hogan, phylogenetic. If you have a p6 and Tom Stokes of Auburn high-speed internet connec- University’s School of Forestry tion, you can download the Field Trip and Wildlife Sciences have de- flora as a PDF file http:// Reports– veloped an interactive web site www.herbarium.unc.edu/ p9 featuring the trees of Alabama flora.htm. To purchase a and the Southeast (https:// hard-bound copy, contact fp.auburn.edu/sfws/samuelson/dendrology/in- Carol Ann McCormick at 919-962-6931.
  • Geology of Selected Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks of Georgia: a Review

    Geology of Selected Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks of Georgia: a Review

    GEOLOGY OF SELECTED MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS OF GEORGIA: A REVIEW Compiled by Harold R. Vincent Keith I. McConnell Philip C. Perley DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DMSION INFORMATION CIRCULAR 82 GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Cover photo: Typical outcrop of metagabbroic rocks of the Brasstown complex, exposed along the shore of Lake Chatuge, near the old Lower Bell Creek corundum mine, approximately 1-3/4 miles north of Hiawassee, Towns County, Georgia. GEOLOGY OF SELECTED MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS OF GEORGIA: A REVIEW Compiled by Harold R. Vincent Keith I. McConnell Philip C. Perley Georgia Department of Natural Resources J. Leonard Ledbetter, Commissioner Environmental Protection Division Harold F. Reheis, Assistant Director Georgia Geologic Survey William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1990 INFORMATION CIRCULAR 82 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Methods of Investigation ............................................................................................. _, ....... 1 An Overview of Previous Investigations .................................................................................... .1 Blue Ridge ................................................................................................................ 1 Northern Piedmont/Blue Ridge? .......................................................................................... .3 Southern Piedmont ... : . ................................................................................................
  • DOCUMENT RESUME RC 004 140 Schretter, Howard A. the Georgia

    DOCUMENT RESUME RC 004 140 Schretter, Howard A. the Georgia

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 037 264 RC 004 140 AUTHOR Schretter, Howard A. TITLE The Georgia Mountains: A View of its Resources, Problems and Potentials. INSTITUTION Georgia Univi., Athens. Inst. of Community and Area Development. PUB DATE 64 NOTE 93p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$4.75 DESCRIPTORS Adult Education, Area Studies, Community Planning, Community Resources, *Economic Opportunities, *Educational Needs, Employment Problems, Planning Commissions, *Population Trends, Regional Planning, *Rural Areas, Social Opportunities, Tourism, *Urban Areas, Vocational Education IDENTIFIERS *Georgia ABSTRACT In this 1964 report, it is noted that some towns and counties in the rural and urban areas of Georgia have been beset with problems associated with population growth and economic expansion, while others have been faced with combating trends of population loss and economic decline. In a unique approach to effective planning and development activities, practically all of Georgia's local governments pooled financial and technical resources to examine the region closely in terms of significant conditions, trends of the time, and outstanding problems and potentials. It was found , for example, that the most far-reaching population trend in the mountains area was its continuing loss of young people, who tended to leave home in search of better economic and social opportunities. Problems also existed in upgrading educational levels for future generations, and emphasis was placed on providing adult education and technical vocational training. The document is appended with tables of data which comprise the base of the study. (AN) U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION A WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS KEN IMPIODUCED EXAM AS RECEIVED MN THE PERSON 01 016AINIATION 0116111A1ING IT.
  • Georgia Appalachian Trail Club

    Georgia Appalachian Trail Club

    GEORGIA APPALACHIAN TRAIL CLUB PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL IN GEORGIA DECEMBER 2006 1 Table Of Contents PART I. - Introduction A. Purpose B. Background PART II. - THE COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/PARTNERS A. The Georgia Appalachian Trail Club B. The Appalachian Trail Conservancy C. The National Park Service D. The U.S.D.A. Forest Service E. The State of Georgia F. Other AT Maintaining Clubs G. Environmental Groups H. Landowners PART III. - The PHYSICAL TRAIL A. Trail Standards B Trail Design/Location/Relocation C. Trail Construction and Maintenance D. Trail Shelters and Campsites E. Signs and Trail Markings F. Bridges and Stream Crossings G. Trail Heads and Parking H. Tools I. Water Sources J. Trail Monitoring Techniques K. Side Trails L. Safety M. Sanitation N. Memorials/Monuments PART IV. - PUBLIC USE, PUBLIC INFORMATION, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE A. Emergency Planning and Coordination B. Special Events and Large Group Use C. Public Information and Education Programs D. Caretaker and Ridgerunner Programss E. Accessibility 2 PART V. - CONFLICTING USES AND COMPETING USES A. Vehicular Traffic B. Abandoned Personal Property C. Hunting D. Horses and Pack Animals E. Roads F. Special Uses G. Utilities and Communications Facilities H. Oil, Gas and Mineral Exploitation I. Military Operations J. Corridor Monitoring PART VI.- RESOURCE MANAGEMENT A. Open Areas and Vistas B. Timber Management C. Pest Management D. Threatened and Endangered Species E. Wildlife F. Vegetation Management and Reclamation G. Historical/Cultural/Natural Resources PART VII. - WILDERNESS A. Motorized Equipment B. Treadway Improvement C. Trail Standards D. Shelters E. Scenic Vistas F. Signs and Trail Markings G.

  • 6 Georgia State Parks for Adrenaline Junkies

    6 Georgia state parks for adrenaline junkies Staff reports 2:02 p.m. EST December 28, 2016 Road Trip A New Year is a great time to challenge yourself, so why not amp up the adrenaline this year? From hiking and running mountains, to climbing trees, zip lining and night paddling, you can test your adventurous spirit in these Georgia state parks not far from Black Mountain. Trail half marathon at Vogel State Park Trail runners train at Georgia State Parks because of the unmatched scenic views and the well-maintained trails. The Coosa Backcountry Trail at Vogel State Park (GaStateParks.org/Vogel) is a 12-mile loop that features about 2,100 feet of elevation gain. Two serious mountain climbs over Coosa Bald and Slaughter Mountain add to the challenge, as the route intersects with the Duncan Ridge Trail for part of the loop. Runners pass over creek crossings, hop over rocks, and run through lush, thick forest throughout the loop. Trek to the depths of Tallulah Gorge State Park At 1,000 feet deep, hikers can explore the bottom of Tallulah Gorge (GaStateParks.org/TallulahGorge) by tackling 600 metal steps and crossing a suspension bridge that sways 80 feet above the ground. Once hikers are on the gorge floor, they can rock-hop across the boulders and explore the hidden gorge floor cave. Be sure to obtain a gorge floor permit from the Interpretation Center before making the 2.5 mile round-trip journey. Tree Climbing at Panola Mountain State Park Tree climbing is not just for kids anymore.

  • CHALLENGES at LAKE WINFIELD SCOTT RECREATION AREA By

    PRIVATE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: CHALLENGES AT LAKE WINFIELD SCOTT RECREATION AREA by MARY C. SCALES ENGLISH (Under the Direction of Eric A. MacDonald) ABSTRACT Lake Winfield Scott Recreation Area was constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps between 1935 and 1942. This thesis evaluates the developmental history, the importance of constructed features as they relate to the natural environment, and highlights the role of private management at this federally-owned recreation site. Analysis considers the potential costs and benefits of the private-public management model, known as a concession or special-use agreement, to determine the efficacy of such management when preserving and conserving cultural landscapes. Ultimately, the goal of this thesis is to provide a substantive analysis of cultural landscape management of sites like Lake Winfield Scott. Through the private-public concessionaire model of management, this cultural landscape has persisted for nearly 80 years. As the political climate surrounding public lands continues to shift, perhaps alterations to the management structure of public lands is in order. INDEX WORDS: Civilian Conservation Corps, New Deal, cultural landscape, privatization, Forest Service, recreation, concession-based management, historic preservation, conservation PRIVATE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: CHALLENGES AT LAKE WINFIELD SCOTT RECREATION AREA by MARY C. SCALES ENGLISH BA, University of Georgia, 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2017 © 2017 Mary C. Scales English All Rights Reserved PRIVATE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: CHALLENGES AT LAKE WINFIELD SCOTT RECREATION AREA by MARY C. SCALES ENGLISH Major Professor: Eric A.