DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Memorandum #1: Transit Service Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Memorandum #1: Transit Service Assessment May 2019 Technical Memorandum #1: Transit Service Assessment (Page Intentionally Left Blank) Metrobus Service Evaluation Study: Riggs Road Line (R1, R2) Table of Contents 1.0 Existing Service Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Route Description - Riggs Road Line (Routes R1, R2) ................................................................ 1 1.2 Key Service Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Line History ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Demographic Context ................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Service Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Hours of Service/Span of Service ............................................................................................... 12 2.2 Service Frequency ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Vehicle Requirements and Capacity ........................................................................................... 16 2.4 Route Directness Analysis .......................................................................................................... 16 3.0 Ridership and Productivity .............................................................................................................. 20 3.1 Daily Ridership ............................................................................................................................ 20 3.2 Cost Recovery from Fares .......................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Boardings per Trip ....................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Subsidy per Passenger ............................................................................................................... 21 3.5 Boardings per Revenue Mile ....................................................................................................... 21 3.6 Average Daily Ridership Trends ................................................................................................. 22 3.7 Fare Payment Characteristics and Transfers ............................................................................. 23 3.8 Block Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 25 4.0 Service Reliability ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.1 On-Time Performance ................................................................................................................. 27 4.2 Scheduled versus Actual Run Time ............................................................................................ 33 4.3 Layover Time............................................................................................................................... 34 4.4 Revenue and Non-Revenue Hours and Miles ............................................................................ 41 4.5 Bus Bunching and Causes .......................................................................................................... 41 4.6 Missed Trips ................................................................................................................................ 43 5.0 Boarding and Alighting by Stop and Line Segment ...................................................................... 44 5.1 Boarding and Alighting Activity by Stop ...................................................................................... 44 5.2 Ten Highest Ridership Stops ...................................................................................................... 52 6.0 Passenger Loading ........................................................................................................................... 55 6.1 Load per Trip ............................................................................................................................... 55 6.2 Segment Level Load Factor ........................................................................................................ 57 6.3 Hourly Ridership versus Capacity ............................................................................................... 60 7.0 Origin and Destination Analysis ...................................................................................................... 65 Technical Memorandum #1: Transit Service Assessment i | P a g e Metrobus Service Evaluation Study: Riggs Road Line (R1, R2) 7.1 Route R1 Origin - Destinations ................................................................................................... 65 7.2 Route R2 Origin - Destinations ................................................................................................... 65 7.3 Origin and Destination Locations ................................................................................................ 70 8.0 Bus Operator Interview Summary ................................................................................................... 72 9.0 Bus Stop Inventory ........................................................................................................................... 73 9.1 Bus Stop Spacing ........................................................................................................................ 73 9.2 Bus stop Passenger Amenities ................................................................................................... 75 9.3 Bus Stop Information ................................................................................................................... 76 9.4 Bus Stop Accessibility ................................................................................................................. 80 Technical Memorandum #1: Transit Service Assessment ii | P a g e Metrobus Service Evaluation Study: Riggs Road Line (R1, R2) List of Figures Figure 1-1 | Riggs Road Line (Routes R1, R2) Existing Service .................................................................. 2 Figure 1-2 | Total Population Along the Riggs Road Line ............................................................................. 8 Figure 1-3 | Population Density Along the Riggs Road Line ......................................................................... 9 Figure 1-4 | Percentage of Minority Population Living Along the Riggs Road Line .................................... 10 Figure 1-5 | Percentage of Individuals Living in Poverty Along the Riggs Road Line ................................. 11 Figure 2-1 | Service Frequency Guideline Assessment (by Segment) ....................................................... 15 Figure 2-2 | Weekday Capacity ................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 2-3 | Saturday Capacity ................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 2-4 | Sunday Capacity ...................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 3-1 | Riggs Road (R1, R2) Historical Annual Average Ridership, 2013-2017 ................................. 23 Figure 3-2 | Transfers to the Riggs Road Line ............................................................................................ 24 Figure 3-3 | Transfers from the Riggs Road Line ........................................................................................ 24 Figure 4-1 | On-Time Performance Weekday Southbound ........................................................................ 30 Figure 4-2 | On-time Performance Weekday Northbound .......................................................................... 30 Figure 4-3 | On-Time Performance Saturday Southbound ......................................................................... 31 Figure 4-4 | On-time Performance Saturday Northbound ........................................................................... 31 Figure 4-5 | On-Time Performance Sunday Southbound ........................................................................... 32 Figure 4-6 | On-Time Performance Sunday Northbound ............................................................................ 32 Figure 4-7 | Riggs Road Line Southbound Scheduled Running Time versus Actual Running Time .......... 33 Figure 4-8 | Riggs Road Line Northbound Scheduled Running Time versus Actual Running Time .......... 33 Figure 4-9 | Weekday Southbound Riggs Road Lines Layover Time ......................................................... 35 Figure 4-10 | Weekday Northbound Riggs Road Lines Layover Time ....................................................... 36 Figure 4-11 | Saturday Southbound Riggs Road Lines Layover Time ....................................................... 37 Figure 4-12 | Saturday Northbound Riggs Road Lines Layover Time ........................................................ 38 Figure 4-13 | Sunday Southbound
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town Crier Official Newsletter, Town of Riverdale Park, Maryland
    The Riverdale Park Town Crier Official Newsletter, Town of Riverdale Park, Maryland March 2006 Volume 35, Issue 2 Ward 1 Election Results 1 Results of Ward 1 Special Special Story 1 Council Actions 2 Runoff Election Council Actions 3 Police Report 3 Spanish Translation 4 Oppenheim Wins Mayor’s Report 5 Public Works Report 6 Ward One Report 6 Community Circles 7 Saturday, February 18, 2006 was a wet and very cold day in our area. Yet, Calendar 8 151 civic minded citizens braved the cold and came out to cast their votes in the Ward 1 Run-off Election. Rob Oppenheim was declared the winner that evening Editor Wanted and was sworn in by Mayor Archer following the election returns. The vote tally The Town of Riverdale Park is was: looking for an editor to manage the development of the Town Total votes cast—153 Crier, published 10 times annu- Rob Oppenheim—99 regular and 22 absentee for 121 total votes ally. If you are interested, send Roland Walker—26 regular and 4 absentee for 30 total votes your resume and writing samples The judges voided 2 votes that were incorrectly marked to Patrick Prangley, Town Ad- ministrator, Town of Riverdale Park, 5008 Queensbury Road, Ward 1 residents are to be commended for the civic mindedness and con- Riverdale Park, MD 20737. gratulations to Rob Oppenheim. We wish him the best in serving as the new Ward 1 Position Open Until Filled Council Representative. ________________________________________________________________ Here’s your chance to clean out your attic, basement, and garage Notice of Kenilworth Avenue Road Improvements by and get rid of some stuff! Maryland State Highway Administration Spring Clean-up Day is By: Patrick J.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda September 14, 2020 1
    Agenda September 14, 2020 MEETING OF UNIVERSITY PARK MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL WILL BE HELD VIA VIDEO AND AUDIO CONFERENCE 7:30 p.m. September 14, 2020 REGULAR SESSION The Council meeting will be conducted entirely remotely with no in-person meeting attendance. To join the Council meeting through a video conference, please use the link below. Join Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82489568048?pwd=RnlEc3QwSDR5YnR3RnRkNUpPWStMdz09 To join with audio only, dial: (301) 715-8592 Meeting ID: 824 8956 8048 Password: 101647 Public Participation: Participants who join the video/audio conference will be muted and video turned off during the meeting except for Mayor, Council, and staff. Participants will have the opportunity to speak during Public Comment - agenda item #6. During that time, all participants will be taken off mute. If you would like to comment, please state your name and Mayor Carey will call on you to speak. Public comments will be limited to three minutes. Public comments or questions may also be made by emailing the Town Clerk Andrea Marcavitch at [email protected]. All electronic comments must be submitted by 6 p.m. on September 14, 2020. Comments received will be read by the Town Clerk during public comment. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Carey Present: Biermann Absent: Biermann Schultz Schultz Morrissey Morrissey Verrill Verrill Caskey Caskey Wells Wells Stephen Stephen 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Carey 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Moved by: Seconded by: Yea: Nay: Abstain: 1 | P a ge Agenda September 14, 2020 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 17, 2020 Moved by: Seconded by: Yea: Nay: Abstain: 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Area's #1 Fishing & Hunting Outfitter
    Dear Angler: Here in Maryland, we need only look to our State Seal — depicting the fisherman and the ploughman — for proof that fishing really is part of our heritage. It’s a fun, affordable and accessible activity for all ages, and a great excuse to get our children away from video and computer games and into the great outdoors! Approximately 700,000 adults and thousands of young people fish each year in Maryland, with an estimated annual impact of $1 billion on our economy. Gov. Martin O’Malley and Sec. John R. Griffin More than a third of our anglers visit from out of state, testimony to the value and quality of our great fishing resources. We are very fortunate to have expert biologists and managers – working to- gether with our Sport Fisheries, Tidal Fisheries and Oyster Advisory Commissions, and our Coastal Fisheries Advisory Committee, to guide fisheries management across our State. We are also very fortunate to have you -- committed conserva- tionists and advocates – working with us. Your license revenues support protection and enhancement of Maryland’s fishery resources, research and management activities, expanded public access and enhanced law enforcement. And we look forward to strengthening our partnership with you as we work toward our goals for a restored Chesapeake Bay, thriving freshwater streams, and healthy abundant fish populations. Thank you for being a part of a great cultural tradition, and here’s wishing you a terrific year of fishing in Maryland. Martin O’Malley John R. Griffin Governor Secretary About the Cover: This edition of the Maryland Fishing Guide is dedicated to Frances McFaden, who retired from public service after 43 years as a steadfast, ever-helpful, and resourceful Maryland state worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince George's County Commissioner Geraldr
    COMMISSION MEETING June 19, 2019 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Montgomery Regional Office Auditorium 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 This page intentionally left blank. ITEM 1 MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 19, 2019 MRO (Auditorium) 10:00 a.m. – 12 noon ACTION Motion Second 1. Approval of Commission Agenda (10:00 a.m.) (+*) Page 1 2. Approval of Commission Minutes (10:05 a.m.) a) Open Session –May 1, 2019 (+*) Page 3 b) Closed Session – May 1, 2019 (++*) c) Open Session – Special Commission Meeting June 6, 2019 (+*) LD 3. General Announcements (10:05 a.m.) a) June is National Caribbean American Heritage Month b) June is Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) Pride Month 4. Committee Minutes/Board Reports (For Information Only) (10:15 a.m.) a) Executive Committee Meeting – Open Session – June 5, 2019 (+) Page 11 b) Executive Committee Meeting – Closed Session – June 5, 2019 (++) c) Employees’ Retirement System Board of Trustees Meeting – Open Session – March 5, 2019 (+) Page 15 d) Employees’ Retirement System Special Board of Trustees Meeting – April 26, 2019 (+) Page 19 5. Action and Presentation Items (10:15 a.m.) a) Resolution #19-05, Adoption of the Approved Veirs Mill Master Plan (McVary) (+*) Page 21 b) Resolution #19-13, Adoption of the Approved MARC Rail Plan (Weaver) (+*) Page 37 c) Resolution #19-14, Land Exchange between M-NCPPC and City of Takoma Park (Sandberg) (+*) Page 45 d) Resolution #19-12, Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2020 Commission Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Adopting 2019 Legislative Priorities
    Takoma Park City Council Meeting – December 5, 2018 Agenda Item 6 Voting Session Resolution Adopting 2019 Legislative Priorities Recommended Council Action Adopt legislative priorities Context with Key Issues Each year the Council adopts priorities in preparation for the upcoming legislative session in Annapolis. Priorities identified to date for 2019 include: • Support for Redevelopment of New Hampshire Avenue (MD 650) • Bond bill funding for the expansion and renovation of the Takoma Park Maryland Library • Legislation prohibiting the Maryland Department of Transportation from spending any funds for the construction of Maryland Route 410 through the City of Takoma Park that would involve the addition of a new through lane for motor vehicles • Protection of small businesses and housing affordability during and after Purple Line construction • Legislation mandating coordination and cooperation between utilities, the State Highway Administration, and municipalities in order to minimize impacts on residents and businesses resulting from infrastructure construction and repairs • Support for expanded opportunities for municipalities to raise revenues without increasing dependence on property taxes • Support for building community resiliency and mitigating the impacts of climate change • Montgomery County Public School construction funding Council Priority A Livable Community for All; Fiscally Sustainable Government; Environmentally Sustainable Community; Engaged, Responsive and Service Oriented Government; Community Development for an Improved and Equitable Quality of Life Environmental Considerations The City Council’s established priorities related to environmental sustainability and recommendations of the Committee on the Environment inform the Council’s consideration of legislative initiatives and in determining positions on various bills introduced in the General Assembly. Fiscal Considerations State legislation may have a positive or negative fiscal impact for the City.
    [Show full text]
  • State Legislative Program
    Agenda Item 1 January 28, 2019 OFFICE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Marc Eirich Melanie Wenger County Executive Director January 24, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Montgomery County Council FROM: Melanie L. Wenger, Director MLW Office of Intergovernmental Relations SUBJECT: Discussion: State Legislation PURPOSE: Receive information; provide input on State bills - Council votes may be required UPDATE OF 2019 SESSION • Update on FY 20 Governor's Budget Request and Public School Construction Discussions STATE LEGISLATION -POSITIONS NEEDED Statewide Bills 1. HB 84, Maryland Farms and Families Fund - Purpose. Use. Funding. and Grant Qualifications -Alterations (Delegates Charkoudian, Hettleman, Feldmark, Glenn, Guyton, Hill, Korman, Lehman, R. Lewis, Lierman, McIntosh, Queen, Smith, Stewart, Terrasa, Washington, C. Watson, and Wilkins) Bill summary: The Maryland Farms and Families Fund (the "Fund") was established by the General Assembly in 2017 (HB 586/SB 278) in an effort to make healthy food more affordable to Maryland residents and to support the State's farmers and farmers markets by leveraging federal funding. The Fund provides grants to non-profit organizations that match purchases made by I 01 Monroe Street• Fourth Floor• Rockville, Maryland 20850-2589 • 240-777-6550 • FAX 240-777-6551 47 State Circle• Suite 303 • Annapolis, Maryland 21401 • 240-777-8270 • FAX 301-261-2820 MAILING ADDRESS: 101 Monroe Street• Fourth Floor• Rockville, Maryland 20850-2589 Montgomery County Council Re: Discussion: State Legislation January 24, 2019 Page 2 consumers with Farmers Market Nutrition Program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children benefits at participating farmer's markets. The grants received by the non-profits are distributed to Maryland farmers markets for healthy local food incentives, as well as for program administration and outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Location of the NIH Bethesda Campus in the Region
    NIH Master Plan 2003 Update Chapter Three The Community Context of the Bethesda Campus Chapter 3 - Page 55 NIH Master Plan 2003 Update 3.1 Location of the NIH Bethesda Campus in the Region 3.1.1 General The NIH main campus is located in Montgomery County, Maryland, one of the largest jurisdictions in the Washington, D.C. region. As a result of expansion of the urbanized area, cross-commuting patterns, and other economic interrelationships, the federal government designated a broader Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA). A CMSA is a geographic entity defined by the Federal Office of Management and Budget for use by federal statistical agencies. An area becomes a CMSA if it meets the requirements to qualify as a metropolitan statistical area, has a population of 1,000,000 or more, if component parts are recognized as Primary Metropolitan Statistical Areas, and if local opinion favors the designation. This CMSA encompasses both the Baltimore and Washington metropolitan areas, embracing an area of nearly 9,600 square miles circumscribed by a 75-mile radius around downtown Washington, D.C. It includes communities from the Pennsylvania border to Calvert and Charles Counties in southern Maryland and on southward in Virginia to Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County (nearly to the edge of metropolitan Richmond). From Queen Anne’s County, Maryland, on the eastern shore of the Chesapeake Bay, the CMSA extends westward beyond the City of Hagerstown and Washington County in western Maryland to Berkeley and Jefferson Counties in West Virginia. The area is expanding at a very rapid rate - with a 2000 Census population of 7,608,070 - with communities and employment spreading over an ever-widening geographic area.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Guide To
    dnr.maryland.gov MARYLAND GUIDE TO 2018 – FISHING 2019 AND CRABBING STATE RECORDS page 47 Also inside... • License Information • Seasons, Sizes and Limits • Fish Identification • Public Lakes and Ponds • Tidal/Nontidal dividing lines • Oysters and Clams ATLANTIC OCEAN | CHESAPEAKE BAY | COASTAL BAYS | NONTIDAL m reedo to fis f ONLY $149 h FOR WORRYFREE FISHING ALL YEAR BREAKDOWNS OUT OF FUEL JUMP STARTS SOFT UNGROUNDINGS Have no worries on the water...TowBoatU.S. is there when you need help. BoatUS.com/Towing GET THE BOATU.S. APP 800-395-2628 WE’RE WITH YOU ON THE WATER 247 FOR ONETOUCH TOWING •Towing details can be found online at BoatUS.com/towing or by calling. dnr.maryland.gov Photo courtesy of Mike Irons 38 Photo courtesy of Sherry Bishop 40 Photo courtesy of Kevin Ensor Photo courtesy of Alan Klotz page 24 43 CONTENTS 44 What’s New���������������������������������������������� 6 Put-and-Take Blue Crabs���������������������������������������40–41 Trout Fishing Areas������������������������22–23 Department of Natural Resources Artificial Reefs��������������������������������������42 Addresses and Phone Numbers����������� 8 Special Management Areas Oyster and Clams���������������������������������43 Trout������������������������������������������24–25 Natural Resources Police Information���������������������������������������������� 8 AllSpecies��������������������������������������26 Highly Migratory Species and Sharks�������������������������������������� 44–45 Catch - A - Poacher�������������������������������� 8 Bass Fishing������������������������������������������28
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Guide to Fishing and Crabbing
    dnr.maryland.gov MARYLAND GUIDE TO 2018 – FISHING 2019 AND CRABBING STATE RECORDS page 47 Also inside... • License Information • Seasons, Sizes and Limits •Fish Identification • Public Lakes and Ponds • Tidal/Nontidal dividing lines •Oysters and Clams ATLANTIC OCEAN | CHESAPEAKE BAY | COASTAL BAYS | NONTIDAL m reedo to fis f ONLY $149 h FOR WORRYFREE FISHING ALL YEAR BREAKDOWNS OUT OF FUEL JUMP STARTS SOFT UNGROUNDINGS Have no worries on the water...TowBoatU.S. is there when you need help. BoatUS.com/Towing GET THE BOATU.S. APP 800-395-2628 WE’RE WITH YOU ON THE WATER 247 FOR ONETOUCH TOWING •Towing details can be found online at BoatUS.com/towing or by calling. dnr.maryland.gov Photo courtesy of Mike Irons 38 Photo courtesy of Sherry Bishop 40 Photo courtesy of Kevin Ensor Photo courtesy of Alan Klotz page 24 43 CONTENTS 44 What’s New���������������������������������������������� 6 Put-and-Take Blue Crabs���������������������������������������40–41 Trout Fishing Areas������������������������22–23 Department of Natural Resources Artificial Reefs��������������������������������������42 Addresses and Phone Numbers����������� 8 Special Management Areas Oyster and Clams���������������������������������43 Trout������������������������������������������24–25 Natural Resources Police Information���������������������������������������������� 8 AllSpecies��������������������������������������26 Highly Migratory Species and Sharks�������������������������������������� 44–45 Catch - A - Poacher�������������������������������� 8 Bass Fishing������������������������������������������28
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix N: Agency Correspondence
    NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX N: AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE Final- May 2020 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Chesapeake Bay Ecological Services Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, MD 21401-7307 Phone: (410) 573-4599 Fax: (410) 266-9127 http://www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/ http://www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/endsppweb/ProjectReview/Index.html In Reply Refer To: July 11, 2018 Consultation Code: 05E2CB00-2018-SLI-1540 Event Code: 05E2CB00-2018-E-03365 Project Name: I-495 and I-270 Managed Lanes Study Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. This species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 16-TIS-820140020.Pdf
    Table of Contents SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 5 Public Road Network ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Site Access Concept ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Study Area Definition ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Transit Facilities and Services ........................................................................................................................ 7 Existing Traffic Counts .................................................................................................................................... 8 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Statement ............................................................................................................... 9 Congestion Standard ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Existing Intersection Critical Lane Volumes ............................................................................................ 11 SECTION 3 - FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Guide To
    dnr.maryland.gov MARYLAND GUIDE TO 2017 – FISHING 2018 & CRABBING WHAT’S NEW See page 6 Also inside... • License Information • Seasons, Sizes & Limits •Fish Identification • Public Lakes & Ponds • T idal/Non tidal dividing lines •Oysters & Clams NONTIDAL | CHESAPEAKE BAY | COASTAL BAYS | ATLANTIC OCEAN You Are Here So Are We NOT EVERY TOWING SERVICE HAS A FLEET STANDING BY TO BACK UP THEIR PROMISES. We do. TowBoatU.S. has over 600 red boats from coast to coast, so you’re never far from help when you need it. Our Captains are licensed professionals that will get you and your boat underway and where you need to go in no time. CALL OR GO ONLINE NOW TO JOIN FOR JUST $149 ALL YEAR. 1-800-395-2628 BoatUS.com/towing Towing details can be found online at BoatUS.com/towing or by calling. dnr.maryland.gov Photo courtesy Dee Kolobow 38 Courtesy of Sherry Bishop 40 Photo courtesy of Steve Peperak page 24 43 CONTENTS 44 What’s New���������������������������������������������� 6 Put-and-Take Sport Fish State Records Rules Trout Fishing Areas������������������������22–23 & Procedures�����������������������������������������39 DNR Addresses & Phone Numbers���������������������������������� 8 Special Management Areas Blue Crabs���������������������������������������40–41 Trout������������������������������������������24–25 Natural Resource Police Artificial Reefs��������������������������������������42 Information���������������������������������������������� 8 AllSpecies��������������������������������������26 Oyster & Clams�������������������������������������43
    [Show full text]