Maryland.Gov MARYLAND
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2014 Charles County Priority Letter
I April 8,2014 The Honorable James T. Smith, Jr. Secretary Maryland Department of Transportation 7201 Corporate Center Drive Hanover, Maryland 2 1076 Dear Secretary Smith: Thank you for the opportunity to present Charles County’s transportation priorities for fiscal year 20 15, in anticipation of our annual tour meeting with you in the fall. Throughout the past year, we have been working closely with the individual modal administrations of the Maryland Department of Transportation, with our elected colleagues in neighboring jurisdictions, and with the Transportation Planning Board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and the Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland, to address our significant local and regional priorities. We appreciate the Maryland Transportation Authority’s efforts to secure a “Record of Decision” for the replacement of the Governor Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge, and the commitment of $56 Million in the current Consolidated Transportation Program for the engineering and right-of-way acquisition of the new bridge. We would also like to express our appreciation to staff of the Maryland Transit Administration and the Maryland State Highway Administration for their sustained efforts to assist Charles and Prince George’s counties in planning for fixed-route, high-capacity transit (Light Rail) service in the MD 5AJ.S. 301 corridor: from the Branch Avenue Metrorail Station to Waldorf and White Plains. Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to the State Highway Administration for their action to replace the MD 234 (Budds Creek Road) bridge over Allens Fresh, following the severe storms and flood waters that destroyed the previous structure. -
MDE-Water Pollution
Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 1 Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapters 01-10 ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 2 Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 01 General ......................................................................................................................................... 2 .01 Definitions................................................................................................................................................. 3 .02 Principles of Water Pollution Control.................................................................................................... -
Maryland PSC Schedules Public Hearing for Massey Solar Project in Kent County
COMMISSIONERS ___________ CONTACT: Tori Leonard 410-767-8054 W. KEVIN HUGHES CHAIRMAN 443-680-1619 (c) [email protected] MICHAEL T. RICHARD ANTHONY J. O’DONNELL ODOGWU OBI LINTON MINDY L. HERMAN For Immediate Release Maryland PSC Schedules Public Hearing for Massey Solar Project in Kent County (BALTIMORE, MD-February 20, 2018) – The Maryland Public Service Commission will hold the first of two public comment hearings on the application of Massey Solar, LLC to construct a 5.0 MW solar generating facility in Kent County, Maryland. The hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 6, 2018, at 6:30 p.m. at St. Clement’s Episcopal Church, 32940 Maryland Line Road in Massey, Maryland. Members of the public who wish to comment on the matter are welcome to attend the hearing before Public Utility Law Judge Ryan C. McLean. A second public hearing will be during the week of April 16, 2018, at a time and location to be determined. According to the application, the solar facility will be constructed on a 55-acre parcel at the intersection of Maryland Route 299 (Massey Road) and Maryland Route 313 in Massey. Copies of the application are available for public inspection and copying at Davis, Moore, Shearon & Associates, 207 E. Water Street, Suite 100, Centreville, Maryland 21617. (Please call Davis, Moore, Shearon & Associates at 443-262-9130 in advance.) Filings and associated pleadings in this case are available in the electronic docket file for Case No. 9407, which may be viewed or downloaded at www.psc.state.md.us. Comments referencing Case No. -
Hughesville Revitalization Plan Chapter 4: Environmental Resources
Hughesville Revitalization Plan Hughesville Sub-Area Plan Existing Conditions Report Chapter 4: Environmental Resources The region is rich with environmentally sensitive areas and natural resources. According to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR), there are two environmentally sensitive areas within the Hughesville Study Area, including National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) recognized wetlands and a potential greenway (refer to Map 7: Environmentally Sensitive Areas). There are also several environmentally sensitive features adjacent to Hughesville including Rural Legacy Areas, Wetlands of Special State Concern (WSSC), Maryland Environmental Trust Easements (MET), Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) lands, DNR Lands, and Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) eligible areas. According to DNR data, the Hughesville Study Area is located within the Lower Potomac River and Patuxent River watersheds, specifically the Gilbert Swamp and Patuxent River Lower sub basins. Preservation Programs The Charles County MET Program and the Rural Legacy Program function as environment protection programs with an added benefit that they often preserve properties with historic significance. The following is a brief description of each program. Maryland Environmental Trust (MET) The Maryland Environmental Trust, an agency of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR), holds conservation easements on natural, agricultural, scenic, and historic properties and is the co-holder of numerous easements across the state with the Maryland Historical Trust. Rural Legacy Program DNR’s Rural Legacy Program was established in 1997. Part of the State’s Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Initiative, it is designed to conserve land by protecting areas rich in farms, forests, and natural and cultural resources. The Program achieves this by partnering with local governments, land trusts, and citizens in the purchase of conservation easements. -
Patuxent River Watershed Functional Plan
TI11E Functional \laster Plan for the Patuxent Ril'er Watershed in \lontgome1y Count) AUTHOR The \lai-·land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commi:sion Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Ril'er \\'atershed in \lontgomei- Count)· DATE \01·ember 1993 PUNNING AGENCY The \Ian land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Cammi ion s~s~ Georgia Al'enue Sill'er Spring. \\D 20910-3~60 SOURCE OF COPIES The \lai-land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commission s~s~Georgia Al'enue Siller Spring.\!D 20910-3"6o ABSTRACT This document contains the text. 11ith supporting graphics. for the Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Rim\\ atershed in \lontgomm Count\. This plan amends the General Plan for the ,\lan·land-\X'ashington Regional District and the \laster Plan for Highwa1, for the \lard and-\\ ashington Regional District. and the following area master plans: Damascus. Olnel'. Sandi Spring-Ashton Special Stud, Area. Eastern \lontgomei-· Count\·. as well as the Functional \laster Plan for Presefl'ation of Agriculture and Rural Open Space. and the Patuxent Ril'er \\ atershed Park .\laster Plan. COPYRIGHT The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 1993 PUBLISHED BY The Montgomery County Planning Department of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.3760 APPROVED BY The Montgomery County Council October 1993 ADOPTED BY The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission November 1993 THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission's geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George's Counties; the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planningjurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties. -
Town Crier Official Newsletter, Town of Riverdale Park, Maryland
The Riverdale Park Town Crier Official Newsletter, Town of Riverdale Park, Maryland March 2006 Volume 35, Issue 2 Ward 1 Election Results 1 Results of Ward 1 Special Special Story 1 Council Actions 2 Runoff Election Council Actions 3 Police Report 3 Spanish Translation 4 Oppenheim Wins Mayor’s Report 5 Public Works Report 6 Ward One Report 6 Community Circles 7 Saturday, February 18, 2006 was a wet and very cold day in our area. Yet, Calendar 8 151 civic minded citizens braved the cold and came out to cast their votes in the Ward 1 Run-off Election. Rob Oppenheim was declared the winner that evening Editor Wanted and was sworn in by Mayor Archer following the election returns. The vote tally The Town of Riverdale Park is was: looking for an editor to manage the development of the Town Total votes cast—153 Crier, published 10 times annu- Rob Oppenheim—99 regular and 22 absentee for 121 total votes ally. If you are interested, send Roland Walker—26 regular and 4 absentee for 30 total votes your resume and writing samples The judges voided 2 votes that were incorrectly marked to Patrick Prangley, Town Ad- ministrator, Town of Riverdale Park, 5008 Queensbury Road, Ward 1 residents are to be commended for the civic mindedness and con- Riverdale Park, MD 20737. gratulations to Rob Oppenheim. We wish him the best in serving as the new Ward 1 Position Open Until Filled Council Representative. ________________________________________________________________ Here’s your chance to clean out your attic, basement, and garage Notice of Kenilworth Avenue Road Improvements by and get rid of some stuff! Maryland State Highway Administration Spring Clean-up Day is By: Patrick J. -
WSSC Update on Consent Decree Projects
Presentation to the Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Water Quality Advisory Group Consent Decree Projects in Montgomery County October 21, 2013 Discussion Points Sewer Repair, Rehabilitation & Replacement (SR3)Program Overview Basins in Montgomery County Consent Decree Project Overview Lateral Contracts Roads Contracts ESA Contracts Expectations During Construction Activities Questions SR3 Program Overview Background Federal Consent Decree between the United States, the State of Maryland, Citizen Groups and WSSC Priority 1 Assets must be completed by December 7, 2015 Large scale program to improve collection system performance and restore condition Reduce sewer overflows and backups Basins in Montgomery County •Cabin John •Dulles Interceptor •Little Falls •Muddy Branch •Monocacy •Northwest Branch •Paint Branch •Patuxent North •Rock Creek •Rock Run •Seneca Creek •Sligo Creek •Watts Branch Consent Decree Projects Overview Laterals Repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of sewer house connections (laterals) and the installation of cleanouts and mainline lateral connection seals. Lateral repairs will involve work between the main line sewer and the property line. Roads Repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of aging and defective sewers using Cured-In-Place Pipe (CIPP), pipe bursting, and open cut excavation. Work also includes chemical grout injection, internal spot repairs, external point repairs, manhole grouting and lining, and cleaning and inspection of sewers. Work occurs in neighborhoods and populated areas. Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) Sanitary sewer system rehabilitation utilizing mainly trenchless methods. Some repair work will require open cut methods. Work consists of the rehabilitating sewer mainline, lateral, and manhole systems. Work will be associated with stream restoration activities and the construction of temporary access roads in ESA. -
Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 the Club Is Dependent Upon the Voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette Cooperation of Those Participating in Its Activities
Mountain Club of Maryland Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 The Club is dependent upon the voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette cooperation of those participating in its activities. Observance of the following guidelines will enhance the enjoyment The Mountain Club of Maryland (MCM) is a non-profit organization, of everyone: founded in 1934, whose primary concern is to provide its members and • Register before the deadline. Early registration for overnight or com- guests the opportunity to enjoy nature through hiking and other activi- plicated trips is especially helpful. Leaders may close registration early ties, particularly in the mountainous areas accessible to Baltimore. when necessary to limit the size of the trip. The leader may also refuse We publish a hike and activities schedule, with varieties in location registration to persons who may not be sufficiently strong to stay with and difficulty. We welcome guests to participate in most of our activi- the group. ties. We include some specialized hikes, such as family or nature hikes. • Trips are seldom canceled, even for inclement weather. Check with We help each other, but ultimately everyone is responsible for their the leader when conditions are questionable. If you must cancel, call individual safety and welfare on MCM trips. the leader before he or she leaves for the starting point. Members and We generally charge a guest fee of $2 for non-members. This fee is guests who cancel after trip arrangements have been made are billed waived for members of other Appalachian Trail maintaining clubs. Club for any food or other expenses incurred. members, through their dues, pay the expenses associated with publish- • Arrive early. -
IN the COURT of APPEALS of MARYLAND No
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 94 September Term, 2005 _________________________________________ SDC 214, LLC v. LONDON TOWNE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. __________________________________________ Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Battaglia Greene Eldridge, John C. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. __________________________________________ Opinion by Eldridge, J. _________________________________________ Filed: November 9, 2006 This case concerns the interpretation of a restrictive covenant which states that a six-acre parcel of land in Anne Arundel County “shall be undeveloped, except for educational facilities in conjunction with the Anne Arundel County Board of Education.” The disputed issue is whether the quoted language means that the Board of Education was required to have been involved in the planning, design or construction of the educational facilities, or, on the other hand, whether the Board’s involvement in the use of the educational facilities is sufficient to permit such facilities under the covenant. I. The parcel of land which is the subject of this dispute is approximately six acres, located in the south east quadrant of the intersection of Maryland Route 2 and Maryland Route 214 in the Edgewater area of Anne Arundel County. The parcel had been part of a 1390-acre tract of land which a developer, Rose of Annapolis Limited Partnership, intended to develop “as a mixed-use community known as South River Colony.” In 1988, the developer Rose of Annapolis entered into a “Development Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions” with each of several community associations representing “citizens who reside in the general vicinity of the Property.” The respondent London Towne Property Owners Association, Inc., was one of these associations entering a Development Agreement and Declaration -2- of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions with the developer. -
Maryland's Lower Choptank River Cultural Resource Inventory
Maryland’s Lower Choptank River Cultural Resource Inventory by Ralph E. Eshelman and Carl W. Scheffel, Jr. “So long as the tides shall ebb and flow in Choptank River.” From Philemon Downes will, Hillsboro, circa 1796 U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle 7.5 Minute Topographic maps covering the Lower Choptank River (below Caroline County) include: Cambridge (1988), Church Creek (1982), East New Market (1988), Oxford (1988), Preston (1988), Sharp Island (1974R), Tilghman (1988), and Trappe (1988). Introduction The Choptank River is Maryland’s longest river of the Eastern Shore. The Choptank River was ranked as one of four Category One rivers (rivers and related corridors which possess a composite resource value with greater than State signific ance) by the Maryland Rivers Study Wild and Scenic Rivers Program in 1985. It has been stated that “no river in the Chesapeake region has done more to shape the character and society of the Eastern Shore than the Choptank.” It has been called “the noblest watercourse on the Eastern Shore.” Name origin: “Chaptanck” is probably a composition of Algonquian words meaning “it flows back strongly,” referring to the river’s tidal changes1 Geological Change and Flooded Valleys The Choptank River is the largest tributary of the Chesapeake Bay on the eastern shore and is therefore part of the largest estuary in North America. This Bay and all its tributaries were once non-tidal fresh water rivers and streams during the last ice age (15,000 years ago) when sea level was over 300 feet below present. As climate warmed and glaciers melted northward sea level rose, and the Choptank valley and Susquehanna valley became flooded. -
Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena
Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena Time Path Path Number of Estimated June 2006 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm ATLANTIC OCEAN ANZ531 Chesapeake Bay Pooles Is To Sandy Pt Md Millers Island to01 1902EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (EG34) Tolchester Beach 1918EST ANZ532 Chesapeake Bay Sandy Pt To N Beach Md 5 SE Annapolis01 2109EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG35) Wind gust measured at Thomas Point Light. A trough of low pressure was draped across the Mid Atlantic on June 1. This feature combined with high moisture content and instability in the atmosphere to promote scattered strong to severe thunderstorms. The thunderstorms first developed across the higher terrain of the Appalachian Mountains, then moved east across the Washington/Baltimore corridor. ANZ534 Chesapeake Bay Drum Pt To Smith Pt Va Solomons Island02 1754EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) 1812EST ANZ536 Tidal Potomac Indian Hd To Cobb Is Md Dahlgren02 1756EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG50) Wind gust was measured at Cuckold Creek. ANZ533 Chesapeake Bay N Beach To Drum Pt Md Cove Pt02 1800EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG37) 1820EST ANZ532 Chesapeake Bay Sandy Pt To N Beach Md 5 SE Annapolis02 1858EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG39) 1901EST ANZ537 Tidal Potomac Cobb Is Md To Smith Pt Va Piney Pt to04 1554EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) Lewisetta 1700EST ANZ534 Chesapeake Bay Drum Pt To Smith Pt Va Patuxent River Nas to04 1605EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) Smith Island 1700EST ANZ535 Tidal Potomac Key Bridge To Indian Hd Md Rnld Reagan Natl Arpt09 1453EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (EG34) ANZ533 Chesapeake Bay N Beach To Drum Pt Md Cove Pt09 1630EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG37) 1700EST ANZ535 Tidal Potomac Key Bridge To Indian Hd Md Rnld Reagan Natl Arpt09 1751EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG36) Daytime heating combined with an unstable lower atmosphere and favorable amounts of moisture contributed to scattered afternoon and evening thunderstorms. -
MC-002-2017, MC Boat Houses
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK & PLANNING COMMISSION Montgomery County Department of Parks Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses Report Number: MC-002-2017 August 31, 2016 Distribution: Executive Committee Casey Anderson Elizabeth Hewlett Patricia Barney Audit Committee Norman Dreyfuss Karen Tobat Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Adrian Gardner John Nissel Mike Riley Christy Turnbull Joseph Zimmerman Office of Internal Audit Renee Kenney Robert Feeley Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Office of Internal Audit 7833 Walker Drive, Suite 425 Greenbelt, MD 20770 Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background………………………………………………………………....1 B. Scope, Objective and Methodology of the Audit………….……………2 C. Major Audit Concerns….…………………………………………….…….3 D. Overall Conclusions…………………………….…………………….……4 II. DETAILED COMMENTARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS None Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses MC-002-2017 I. EXECUTI VE SUMMARY A. Background Black Hill Boat House is located in Black Hill Regional Park on the 505 acre Little Seneca Lake in Boyds, Maryland. Lake Needwood Boat House is located in Rock Creek Regional Park on the 75 acre Lake Needwood in Rockville, Maryland. They are managed by the Enterprise Division under the Deputy Director of Operations within the Montgomery County Department of Parks. Both boat houses have kayaks, canoes, rowboats and pedal boats available for rent, along with a pontoon boat for tours. Fishing is also allowed at each lake. Page 1 Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses MC-002-2017 B. Scope, Objective, and Methodology of the Audit Objective: The purpose of this audit was to perform a review of both Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses to evaluate and assess the adequacy of the design and operational effectiveness of their internal controls and determine if Commission policies and procedures are being followed.