Roger Fenton. London

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roger Fenton. London EXHIBITION REVIEWS will to pause only long enough be spoon-fed rooms factoids by educational wall texts. The (dramatically lit with darkly painted walls) have been far too crowded for any mosdy ? individual viewer to identify and get an to enough of uninterrupted view seriously - the better art on appreciate works of display. 1 After its London showing, the exhibition will be shown at the Phillips Collection, Washington, from ist February to 14thMay. 2 Catalogue: Degas, Sickert and Toulouse-Lautrec: London and Paris 1870-1910. By Anna Gruetzner Robins and Richard Thomson. 232 pp. incl. 100 col. pis. + 50 b. & w. ills. (T?te Publishing, London, 2005), ?35 (HB). ISBN 1-85437-634-9; ?26.99 (PB). ISBN 1-85437 548-2 (PB). Roger Fenton 68. Orientalist London group, by Roger Fenton. 1858. byALEXANDRA MOSCHOVI Albumen silver print from glass 25.5 the exhibition negative, by Roger Fenton: Photographs 26.3 cm. (Wilson at T?te Lon 1852-1860, currendy Britain, Centre for Photog don (to 22nd January), where this reviewer raphy, London; saw a not as a exh. T?te it, is welcome event, only long Britain, awaited monographic study of England's most London). celebrated mid-nineteenth-century landscape as and architectural photographer, but also the first show of historic photography at the of the photographer Gustave Le Gray, setting not-for-profit club, he approached the Photo T?te.1 with a on a Concurrent the ubiquitous off, only few months later, his first graphic Association, primarily commercial enthusiasm for to contemporary photography, photographic expedition toRussia. Although agency, in order have his photographs in recent a there has been, years, gradual he promoted the educational aspects of showcased for sale. To add to his scanty earn revival of interest in nineteenth-century pho photography, and also worked tirelessly ings from fairly sporadic print sales, Fenton As itwas as a in a to tographs. Douglas Crimp remarked, towards establishing photography high succeeded receiving commission pho was only when photography elevated to the art (being a foundingmember of the Photo tograph the exhibits at the BritishMuseum. status of autonomous art that nineteenth-cen graphic Society of London and organising And itwas with commercial intent that he a new as a tury photographs acquired currency exhibitions in Britain and abroad), Fenton undertook the expedition, with portable art own was to own to objects in their right, and printsfrom equally keen market his work.3 It darkroom, Balaclava in the spring of 1855. the Crimean War, Egypt or theHoly Land, is telling that, in the face of objections from Capitalising on his royal connections (hewas classified under a long topographical names, the members of the Photographic Society, commissioned by Queen Victoria to take anew could echo the authorial voice of Roger informalportraits of the royal family,while his Fenton, Francis Frith or Francis Bedford.2 photographs were regularly acquired for the A joint venture of three American institu queen's collection; Fig.69) and financially tions, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in supportedby Thomas Agnew, not only did he to at New York, the National Gallery of Art in gain permission photograph the barracks Washington and theJ. Paul GettyMuseum in of the allied armies in Sevastopol during the venues access Los Angeles (inwhich the exhibition Crimean War, but he also gained to all has already been shown), this retrospective the leading military figures,whose dignified brings together vintage printsfrom disparate portraits, he mistakenly believed, would a photographic collections around the world, constitute portfolio that would attract aristo from the obvious international at a ranging collec cratic buyers and therefore sell good price. tions of photographicato the archive of the Fenton did not differentiatebetween the Canadian Center for Architecture and the commercial and the aesthetic value of his at an Royal Collection Windsor. It is attempt work, and nor did he distinguish between to outline Fenton's and versatility re-evaluate the processes of 'taking' and 'making' photo his in the as as authorship cultural well the graphs. He would unreservedly stage a contexts commercial of the period. Fenton photograph if the outcome were to convey was a amore most born into familyof wealthy industrialists the message in direct and, impor outside Manchester. studied and Having law tandy, visually pleasing way. In his Crimean to a career unsuccessfully attempted launch photographs, for instance, he asked the senior as a to painter, he turned photography, which, officials to dress in their winter uniforms and in overcoats even were having been included theGreat Exhibition though they being was of 1851, attracting gathering interest in photographed in springtime. In the same 69. Prince Duke Fenton. Britain. Alfred, ofEdinburgh, by Roger Overwhelmed by the examples of vein, the series of he took in 1856. Salted paper print from glass negative, 33.2 by 26 photographs method he saw at in a manner similar to photographic Crystal cm. (Royal Photographic Society Collection at the 1858, orientalising Fenton instruction in the William Holman constitutes Palace, sought National Museum of Photography, Film and Televi Hunt, make at the Paris exh. T?te scenes wax-paper negative process studio sion, Bradford; Britain, London). believe which emulated the pictorial THE BURLINGTON MAGAZINE CXLVIII JANUARY 200? 5^ Burlington Magazine is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to The Burlington Magazine ® www.jstor.org EXHIBITION REVIEWS - mannerism and narrative of genre painting, limitations of the wet-collodion method and also the tableaux-vivant photography with exhibition and commercially published of the Orientalist period. group (cat. no.62; prints of the series, the display also shows as an Fig.68), which may be read avant la lettre Fenton's conscious use of different media, an of the notion that a not postmodernist parody aspect fully addressed in the main show. has unassailable value as on photograph 'truth', Here the emphasis is ultimately the depicts Fenton dressed in theTurkish costume aesthetic value of existing vintage prints.This of a entertained a musician a con pasha, being by quality is not without relevance for an (the painter Frank Dillon) and exotic temporary audience, for Fenton's work brings dancer The (a professional model). full-frarne together different genres, themes, formats on retains all the a manner copy currendy display signs and audiences, in which strongly current of artifice: the studio walls and the hanging chimes with the all-inclusive profile of come into behind the and drapery sight props, photography. were 70. A connoisseurs, Bourne. 1807. the wires that used to keep the model's meeting of by John 1 Watercolour on paper, 41.3 by 55.5 cm. (Victoria and hands stillduring the exposure are discernible Catalogue: All theMighty World: The Photographs of Albert Museum, London; exh. Manchester Art in were Edited Gordon Baldwin, the foreground. These laboriously Roger Fenton, 1852?1860. by Malcolm Daniel and Sarah with contribu Gallery). eliminatedfrom the exhibition prints. Greenough, tions by Richard Pare, Pam Roberts and Roger Taylor. Combining traditional art-historical schol 304 incl. 96 col. + 208 b. & w. ills. pp. pis. (Metropoli cast net one arship with modern contextual analysis, the her wider than might at first tanMuseum of Art, New York, and Yale University curators of the present show and the contrib expect, for there is an contradiction Press, New Haven and London, 2004), ?40. ISBN irritating utors to the between the tide of the Black stunningly produced catalogue 1-58839-128-0. show, Victorians, have endeavoured to a 2 and its Black in British Art present comprehensive See D. Crimp: On theMuseum's Ruins, London 1993, subtide, People career to image of Fenton's decade-long by PP.73-74. 1800?1 goo. Marsh disarmingly admits this on artistic as as 3 Fenton's definition of the art of no drawing the well commercial open-ended photog but gives explanation. Some fascinating was in aspects of his work.4 The exhibition begins raphy manifest his drafting of the 'Proposal for examples fall into the period before 1837 and the Formation of a Society' inwhich he one can see to with various self-portraits,followed by dis Photographical why Marsh wanted include a tinct as as explicitly stated that such society should 'include sections, thematic well chronologi them. John Bourne's humorous group of itsmembers men of all ranks of life' and that among a cal. Unsurprisingly, Fenton's large-format connoisseurs appraising muscular black male 'while men of eminence, from their fortune, social posi no. a landscapes, much praised by his contempo model of 1807 (cat. 19; Fig.70) has tion, or scientific reputation, are welcomed, no pho raries, dominate the From the curious frisson, and theatrical display. tographer of respectability in his particular sphere of life John Simpson's Turnerian in and below the The slave in which the his light Wharfe pool, be rejected', stressing that the annual subscription captive (no.88), slave, raised to a Strid of 1854 (no. 13) and his Whisderian should be kept small 'in order that none may be exclud eyes heaven like Baroque saint, view narrowness Thames of Westminster from Waterloo ed by the of theirmeans'; R. Fenton: 'Pro embodies the noble pathos that appealed to to for the Formation of a Bridge of 1858 (no.60) the epic representa posal Photographical Society' the Abolitionists. In contrast, a modest chalk nature in dt. tion of in Glyn Pont-y-Pant (1852), quoted Baldwin, op. (note 1), p.214. made in in 1815 Lledr,from 4 drawing Liverpool by John When, in the 1860s, with the of of 1857 (no.3 5), which followed the pictur early proliferation Downman of a black sailor (no.40; Fig.71) photographic studios and the popularisation of carte esque tradition of theWelsh Bettws School, has a seen in this exhibition; de-visite his was quality rarely treatment was a portraiture, photography, by standards, Fenton's of landscape always it expresses the humanity of direct, sensitive vulgarised, Fenton sold his equipment and one thou technical and compositional tour de force.
Recommended publications
  • The Other Side of the Lens-Exhibition Catalogue.Pdf
    The Other Side of the Lens: Lewis Carroll and the Art of Photography during the 19th Century is curated by Edward Wakeling, Allan Chapman, Janet McMullin and Cristina Neagu and will be open from 4 July ('Alice's Day') to 30 September 2015. The main purpose of this new exhibition is to show the range and variety of photographs taken by Lewis Carroll (aka Charles Dodgson) from topography to still-life, from portraits of famous Victorians to his own family and wide circle of friends. Carroll spent nearly twenty-five years taking photographs, all using the wet-collodion process, from 1856 to 1880. The main sources of the photographs on display are Christ Church Library, the Metropolitan Museum, New York, National Portrait Gallery, London, Princeton University and the University of Texas at Austin. Visiting hours: Monday: 2:00 pm - 4.30 pm; Tuesday - Thursday: 10.00 am - 1.00 pm; 2:00 pm - 4.30 pm; Friday: 10:00 am - 1.00 pm. Framed photographs on loan from Edward Wakeling Photographic equipment on loan from Allan Chapman Exhibition catalogue and poster by Cristina Neagu 2 The Other Side of the Lens Lewis Carroll and the Art of Photography ‘A Tea Merchant’, 14 July 1873. IN 2155 (Texas). Tom Quad Rooftop Studio, Christ Church. Xie Kitchin dressed in a genuine Chinese costume sitting on tea-chests portraying a Chinese ‘tea merchant’. Dodgson subtitled this as ‘on duty’. In a paired image, she sits with hat off in ‘off duty’ pose. Contents Charles Lutwidge Dodgson and His Camera 5 Exhibition Catalogue Display Cases 17 Framed Photographs 22 Photographic Equipment 26 3 4 Croft Rectory, July 1856.
    [Show full text]
  • Della Fotografia “Istantanea” 1839-1865
    DELLA FOTOGRAFIA “ISTANTANEA” 1839-1865 Giovanni Fanelli 2020 DELLA FOTOGRAFIA “ISTANTANEA” 1839-1865 Giovanni Fanelli 2020 L’arte ha aspirato spesso alla rappresentazione del movimento. Leonardo da Vinci fu maestro nello studio dell’ottica, della luce, del movimento e nella raffigurazione della istantaneità nei fenommeni naturali e nella vita degli esseri viventi. E anche l’arte del ritratto era per lui cogliere il movimento dell’emozione interiore. * La fotografia, per natura oggetto e bidimensionale, non può a rigor di termini riprodurre il movimento come in un certo modo può fare il cinema; può soltanto, se il fotografo ne ha l’intenzione, riprenderne un istante che nella sua fugacità riassuma la mobilità. Tuttavia fin dall’inizio della storia della fotografia i fotografi aspirarono a riprendere il movimento. Già Daguerre o Talbot aspiravano alla istantaneità. Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre, Paris, Boulevard du Temple alle 8 del mattino, fine aprile 1838, dagherrotipo, 12,9x16,3, Munich, Fotomuseum im mûnchner Stadtmuseum. Henry Fox Talbot, Eliza Freyland con in braccio Charles Henry Talbot, con Eva e Rosamond Talbot, 5 aprile 1842, stampa su carta salata da calotipo, 18,8x22,5. Bradford, The National Museum of Photography, Film & Television. Una delle prime immagini fotografiche, il dagherrotipo della veduta ripresa da Daguerre dall’alto del suo Diorama è animata : all’angolo del boulevard du Temple è presente un uomo immobile il tempo di farsi lucidare le scarpe. Le altre persone che certamente a quell’ora animavano il boulevard non appaiono perché il tempo di posa del dagherotipo era lungo (calcolabile a circa 7 minuti) (cfr. Jacques Roquencourt http://www.niepce-daguerre.com/ ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Photographic Truth
    The Photographic Truth! ! History of Information 103! Geoff Nunberg! ! March 18, 2014! 1! The Impact of Photography! year 2015 1980 1950 1900 1800 1700 1600 1200 600 400 0 500 3000 5000 30,000 50,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 week 2! Agenda, 3/17! Why photograph? The birth of the "information age"; photography and information! Photography as a technology! The photographic "truth"! Manipulating & questioning the photographic truth, then and now! Photography as documentation! Fixing identities! Documenting the deviant! Representing the other! How we read photographs! (What's left out: photography as art, popular form, etc.)! 3! The Range of "Photography"! Things we count as “photography”….! .! 4! The Range of “Photography”! Things we don’t (usually) count as photography! What defines a "technology"? Features of use, distribution, markets etc. ! 5! What makes a "technology"?! How many technologies?! telegraphy! broadcast! ?! Photography! 6! Inventions, Technologies, Applications, Media! Inventions Technology Applications Media "pre-photography" ! Official records! Newspapers, magazines! Photo- Nièpce, Dauguerre, journalism/ Talbot, Archer, etc.! documentary! ! PHOTOGRAPHY "Art" Cartes de visite, photography! snapshots, Collodion, dry commemorative, plate...! advertiising, Consumer porn, fashion photography! etc,! ! Photolithography, Micro- color, Scientific photography etc.! phototelegraphy, uses! digital, etc. ! Surveillance, military, 7! forensic, etc.! Multiple Influences! Market forces! Mass press Photographic & printing ! technology! Magazines Documentary Ideological photography background! Books & expositions Public attitudes! Cultural Setting! 8! Modern Marvels! "Only on looking back, fifty years later, at his own figure in 1854, and pondering on the needs of the twentieth century, he wondered whether, on the whole, the boy of 1854 stood nearer to the thought of 1904, or to that of the year 1 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Quiet Images from the Crimean War Photographer Roger Fenton Roger Fenton Photographed Focused on Pomp and Camp Life by P AMELA D
    [PORTFOLIO] n February 20, 1855, seven years before Mathew Brady displayed pictures of the Quiet Images From the bloody battlefield of Antietam on the door of his New York photography studio, Roger Fenton sailed from London for the Crimea to photograph the British Army and its Valley of Death ✮ allies at war against Russia. Taking a camera into battle was Oa revolutionary idea, and photography itself was a relatively Crimean War photographer Roger Fenton new art form. There was no demand for journalistic images; focused on pomp and camp life newspapers and popular journals employed sketch artists and engravers to produce illustrations. Except for portraits, art pho- BY PAMELA D. TOLER tographs were luxury items purchased as books of “views” by private collectors. ✮ Fenton was a major figure in British pho- all high res and art tography at the time. Born into an upper-middle-class family, processing tk In the Crimean War, Roger Fenton photographed carefully staged tableaus, like this mortar battery and crew next to their bomb-proof shelter. photo credit photo credit autumn 2012 | mhq 71 he studied painting in London and Paris in the 1840s. In 1852, room. Dust spoiled many pictures; more still were ruined by the he took up photography, perhaps in response to the photo- jostling of what he described as “the crowds of all sorts who graphic exhibition at the first World’s Fair, at London’s Crystal flock round,” each soldier hoping Fenton would take a portrait Palace in 1851. he could send home. A competent painter at best, he proved both a talented pho- Royal patronage gave Fenton privileges not enjoyed by the tographer and an innovative promoter of the art form.
    [Show full text]
  • By the Time Roger Fenton Left England to Photograph the Crimean War In
    Roger Fenton and the Crimean War Roger Fenton was one of the first pioneers of war photography. The images he took covering the Crimean War, along with the letters he wrote to his family and the Manchester print-seller Thomas Agnew (who financed this expedition), are rich with explicit and implicit information documenting the conflict. The tone of the letters is noteworthy. Although they were edited when published in 1954, Fenton’s sense of humor and intrepid spirit are readily apparent. He assumed the voice of an almost jaunty world traveler witnessing a spectacle that alternately amazed, amused, and horrified him, that complicated but never confounded his efforts, and that, while it provoked periods of sadness, never aroused deep moral indignation. It has been suggested that Fenton’s experience in the Crimea was far less negative in part because he did not arrive until the spring of 1855, when the devastating winter was over and some improvements had been made in conditions. He also carried letters of introduction from Prince Albert, which guaranteed him exceptional access and privilege. While Times journalist William Howard Russell was barely tolerated as a result of his criticisms of English and French leaders in the war effort, everywhere Fenton turned he received support and assistance from the highest- ranking officers in the region. Aided by an assistant and a handyman, Fenton began photographing within a few days of his March 8, 1855 landing at the port of Balaklava. Using two cameras, he worked diligently for three months, making more than 350 negatives. His purpose on this trip was to create a commercially viable portfolio of photographs aimed at the upper levels of British society.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th & 20Th Century Photography
    19th & 20th Century Photography The Collection of Dr David Gruebel-Lee 19 MAY 2021 DW101-238 Day One.qxp_Layout 1 30/04/2021 11:22 Page 1 19TH & 20TH CENTURY PHOTOGRAPHY CAMERAS AND ACCESSORIES 19 May 2021 commencing at 10am VIEWING BY APPOINTMENT AUCTIONEERS Chris Albury Henry Meadows Mallard House, Broadway Lane, South Cerney, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 5UQ T: +44 (0) 1285 860006 E: [email protected] www.dominicwinter.co.uk DW101-238 Day One.qxp_Layout 1 30/04/2021 11:22 Page 2 IMPORTANT SALE INFORMATION: COVID-19 Please note that due to the UK government's COVID-19 lockdown restrictions currently in place for England there may be no bidding in person for this sale. Viewing for this sale is available by booked appointment only. Please check our website or contact the offices to make an appointment or for more information. All lots are fully illustrated on our website (www.dominicwinter.co.uk) and all our specialist staff are ready to provide detailed condition reports and additional images on request. We recommend that customers visit the online catalogue regularly as extra lot information and images will be added in the lead-up to the sale. CONDITION REPORTS Condition reports now including video conferencing can be requested in the following ways: T: +44 (0)1285 860006 E: [email protected] Via the relevant lot page on our website www.dominicwinter.co.uk BIDDING Customers may submit commission bids or request to bid by telephone in the following ways: T: +44 (0)1285 860006 E: [email protected] Via the relevant lot page on our website www.dominicwinter.co.uk Live online bidding is available on our website www.dominicwinter.co.uk (surcharge of 3% + vat): a live bidding button will appear 60 minutes before the sale commences.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th & 20Th Century Photography China, Formosa & Japan Military
    19th & 20th Century Photography China, Formosa & Japan Military Cased Images 18 NOVEMBER 2020 19TH & 20TH CENTURY PHOTOGRAPHY CHINA, FORMOSA & JAPAN MILITARY CASED IMAGES 18 November 2020 COMMENCING 10am VIEWING BY APPOINTMENT 9-17 November (weekdays) AUCTIONEERS Chris Albury Henry Meadows Mallard House, Broadway Lane, South Cerney, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 5UQ T: +44 (0) 1285 860006 E: [email protected] www.dominicwinter.co.uk IMPORTANT SALE INFORMATION: COVID-19 Please note that in accordance with current UK Government instructions regarding Covid-19, we are pleased to offer restricted public viewing of this sale by appointment only. Viewing by appointment 9-17 November (weekdays). To request an appointment, please email [email protected] or call us on 01285 860006. At the time of writing, we do not expect to make public attendance available on either of the two sale days. This restriction will remain under review over the three weeks prior to sale. All lots are fully illustrated on our website (www.dominicwinter.co.uk) and all our specialist staff are ready to provide detailed condition reports and additional images on request. We recommend that customers visit the online catalogue regularly as extra lot information and images will be added in the lead-up to the sale. CONDITION REPORTS Condition reports now including video conferencing can be requested in the following ways: T: +44 (0)1285 860006 | E: [email protected] Via the relevant lot page on our website www.dominicwinter.co.uk ARTIST'S RESALE RIGHT LAW ("DROIT DE SUITE") Lots marked with AR next to the lot number may be subject to Droit de Suite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Camera and the Red Cross: "Lamentable Pictures" and Conflict
    International Review of the Red Cross (2020), 102 (913), 417–443. Digital technologies and war doi:10.1017/S1816383121000072 The camera and the Red Cross: “Lamentable pictures” and conflict photography bring into focus an international movement, 1855–1865 Sonya de Laat* Dr Sonya de Laat is a member of the Humanitarian Health Ethics research group, an Academic Adviser in the Global Health graduate programme at McMaster University, Canada, and a member of the Canadian Network on Humanitarian History. Abstract Henry Dunant’s appeal for a neutral and impartial organization to provide care to wounded combatants aligned with growing criticism of mid-nineteenth-century European and North American conflicts. This article discusses the important convergence of Dunant’s “lamentable pictures”, laid out in his Memory of * The author would like to thank her doctoral thesis committee: Sharon Sliwinski (Western University), Amanda Grzyb (Western University) and Lisa Schwartz (McMaster University). She would also like to thank Valérie Gorin (CERAH), Dominique Marshall (Carleton University) and members of the Canadian Network on Humanitarian History for comments on early drafts of this paper. Her participation in the Global Humanitarian Research Academy, along with her SSHRC and OGS doctoral awards, were invaluable in supporting research for this paper. © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the ICRC. 417 S. de Laat Solferino, with spectators’ passionate responses to them and to battlefield photographs that circulated between 1855 and 1865. Through these images and reactions, there emerged a shared, expanded vision of humanity worth caring for, which brought into focus an international humanitarian movement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Photography Notable Developments Since 1519 Sir John Herschel
    A Brief History of Photography Notable developments since 1519 Sir John Herschel First coined the term “Photography” in 1839, the year the photographic process became public Derived from Greek words: “Photo” = “light” “graphy” = “writing” Early Photography Have you ever used a film camera? (How is it different to use a film camera than to use a digital camera?) Two processes made early photography possible The optical process and the chemical process The Optical Process 1519, Leonardo da Vinci creates diagram of a camera obscura A small, dark room or building with no windows Small hole in one wall Resulted in an upside-down image of the world on the opposing wall The Optical Process Became used as an aid to drawing Technically the camera existed before photography! The Chemical Process Could not do much with just camera obscura needed a way to capture the image 1816 – Nicephore Niepce combines camera obscura with photosensitive paper Paper that hardened and changed when exposed to light 1826 – Niepce creates first photograph The Chemical Process Could not do much with just camera obscura needed a way to capture the image 1816 – Nicephore Niepce combines camera obscura with photosensitive paper Paper that hardened and changed when exposed to light 1826 – Niepce creates first photograph How to Make it Practical? Niepce’s photographs took eight hours of exposure Photography needed to become more practical Two men tried to solve this problem: Louis Daguerre William Henry Fox Talbot The Photography Wars Louis DaGuerre
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Fenton
    Roger Fenton PASHA AND BAYADERE Roger Fenton PASHA AND BAYADERE Gordon Baldwin GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART Los ANGELES Christopher Hudson, Publisher Cover: Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor Roger Fenton (British, 1819-1869). Pasha and Bayadere, 1858 [detail]. William Peterson, Editor Albumen print, 45 x 36.3 cm (17 "Ae x 14 V4 in.). Eileen Delson, Designer Los Angeles, J. Paul Getty Museum (84.XP.219.32). Jeffrey Cohen, Series Designer Stacy Miyagawa, Production Coordinator Frontispiece: Ellen Rosenbery Photographer Roger Fenton. Self-Portrait in Zouave Uniform, 1855. © 1996 The J. Paul Getty Museum Albumen print, 17.3 x 15.3 cm (6I3/i6 x 6 in.). 17985 Pacific Coast Highway Los Angeles, J. Paul Getty Museum (84.XM.io28.i7). Malibu, California 90265-5799 Mailing address: All works of art are reproduced (and photographs P.O. Box 2112 provided) courtesy of the owners unless otherwise Santa Monica, California 90407-2112 indicated. Library of Congress Typography by G 8i S Typesetters, Inc., Cataloging-in-Publications Data Austin, Texas Printed by C & C Offset Printing Co., Ltd., Baldwin, Gordon. Hong Kong Roger Fenton : Pasha and Bayadere / [Gordon Baldwin]. p. cm. (Getty Museum studies on art) ISBN 0-89236-367-3 i. Photography, Artistic. 2. Portrait photog- raphy. 3. Fenton, Roger, 1819-1869. I. Fenton, Roger, 1819-1869. II. Title. III. Series. TR652.B35 1996 77o'.092-DC20 96-1755 CIP CONTENTS Through Victorian Eyes: An Inventory of a Photograph i Etudes: Fenton and French Orientalism 22 Travelers' Notes and Poet's License: British Pictorial
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Crimean War 1854
    Legacies of the Crimean War 1854 Joy Copland SA Medical Heritage Society May 2014 J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Where on earth? J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Crimea J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Crimean war - cause Ottoman Empire – (Turkey) included the Holy Land (Israel); France & Russia vied for authority of the Holy Land, and Ottomans occupying the territory; Disagreement escalated; peaceful negotiations failed… Britain & France sided with Turkish Ottomans - war against Russia. J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Crimean war 1853: Turkey declares war on Russia; 1854: Britain & France declare war on Russia; Troops from Britain, France, Kingdom of Sardinia, Duchy of Nassau & Turkey fight Imperial Russian troops in the Crimea; Colossal loss of life (all nations): of 1 650 000 soldiers, 900 000 died; Those who perished – many died from disease rather than wounds. Kingdom of Sardinia 1815 J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Lead-up to 1854 1815 Napoleonic wars end - France vs Britain; 1837 Somerset House – central UK General Registry for Births, Deaths & Marriages; 1847: Florence & Parthenope Nightingale attend British Association for Advancement of Science meeting; Actuary (Neison) - counties with better educated people - lower crime rates; higher taxes to finance public education. J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Crimean War – medical support Military doctors - surgeons Nurses Florence Nightingale ~ 34 nurses, trained in Germany; religious orders Hospital at Scutari in Turkey J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Crimean theatre of war To reach the hospital, wounded troops - sailed across the Black Sea in overcrowded transport ships J Copland: Legacies of the Crimean War Scutari Coldstream Guards in front of a wall, with a landing-stage behind.
    [Show full text]
  • The Photographic Truth
    The Photographic Truth History of Information 103 Geoff Nunberg March 16, 2017 1 Study guide tips Section A: Identify and explain the relevance to the history of information of the following. Socrates: 5th c. BC Greek philosopher who invented the Socratic method and laid the groundwork for Western philosophy and logic… 2 Study guide tips Section A: Identify and explain the relevance to the history of information of the following. Socrates: 5th c. BC Greek philosopher who invented the Socratic method and laid the groundwork for Western philosophy and logic… Greek philosopher. In the Phaedrus he set out several arguments against writing: one cannot enter into a dialectic with the written word; writing degrades memory and gives people a superficial acquaintance with a subject…. etc. (But he owned a lot of books.) (42 wds) 3 History of Information The Impact of Photography 2017 ake news 1980 1950 1900 1800 1700 1600 1200 600 400 0 500 3000 5000 30,000 50,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 week Agenda, 3/16 Why photography? Photography as a technology photography and information “Inventing” photography The photographic "truth" Documenting war Manipulating the photographic truth Photography as documentation Fixing identities Documenting the deviant Representing the forgotten (What's left out: photography as art, popular form, scientific tool, etc.) 5 The Range of "Photography" Things we count as “photography”…. 6 The Range of “Photography” Things we don’t (usually) count as photography What defines a "technology"? Features of use, distribution, markets etc. 7 What makes a "technology"? How many technologies? telegraphy broadcast ? Photography 8 Inventions, Technologies, Applications, Media Inventions technologies applications media "pre-photography" Official Newspapers, records magazines Photo- journalism/d Nièpce, Dauguerre, ocumentary Talbot, Archer, etc.
    [Show full text]