DOCSLIB.ORG

Parlement Européen Faits Et Chiffres (Avril 2018)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parlement Européen Faits Et Chiffres (Avril 2018) BRIEFING Avril 2018 Parlement européen: Faits et chiffres La présente note d’information, publiée par le service de recherche du Parlement européen, a pour ob- jet de diffuser des données factuelles et chiffrées sur le Parlement, tant aujourd’hui – pendant l’actuelle législature 2014 à 2019 – que pendant les sept législatures précédentes à compter de l’instauration des élections au suffrage direct en juin 1979. Sur les pages suivantes figurent plusieurs types de graphiques qui: • détaillent la composition du Parlement européen, aujourd’hui et dans le passé, • retracent l’augmentation du nombre de partis représentés au Parlement et montrent l’évolution des groupes politiques, • décrivent l’augmentation du nombre de femmes députées européennes, • expliquent les modes de scrutin utilisés pour les élections au Parlement dans les États membres, • comparent les taux de participation aux élections européennes avec ceux relevés aux élections nation- ales, • résument l’activité du Parlement durant la précédente et l’actuelle législatures, • exposent le coût annuel du Parlement européen et le comparent avec celui d’autres parlements, • donnent un aperçu de la composition des principaux organes du Parlement européen. Au cours de la législature 2014-2019, la présente note d’information est régulièrement mise à jour, de manière à refléter tout changement de la situation. European Parliament by political groups Parlement européen (2014-2019) European Parliament by political groups Total 751Total seats Taille des groupes politiques ProporPourctionenta and numberge de siègesof seats ofoccupés Members par by group les NombreNumber de députés of Members par groupe in each politique group groupes politiques depuis le 1er avril 2018 Répartition des 751 sièges par groupe politique NI 6.9% 52 ALDE 219 PPE 217 Verts/ALE EPP (Group of the European People's Party) PPE 9,0% 189 S&D (Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists 6.4% 189 S&D and Democrats6,9 in% the European Parliament)29,2 % ENF 48 72 ECR 74 ECR (European Conservatives and Reformists) 68 ALDE S&D 68 ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe) ECR 52 Verts/ALE 25,2 % 9.5% 71 52 GUE/NGL (European United Left/Nordic Green Left) 9,6 % EFDD 51 GUE/NGL 51 Greens/EFA (The Greens/European Free Alliance) EFDD 44 EFDD 5,9 % 36 ENF 751 42 EFDD (Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group)Total ENF ECR 29.2% 40 ENL 4,8 % 220 20 NI députés GUE/NGL 6,8 % 751 sièges 2,6 % NI 18 NI (Non-attached Members) Groupes politiques du Parlement actuel par ordre décroissant de taille: EPP 9.1% 67 • Groupe du Parti populaire européen – PPE (chrétiens démocrates), • Groupe de l’Alliance progressiste des socialistes et démocrates au Parlement européen – S&D, • Groupe des Conservateurs et Réformistes européens – ECR, ALDE 6.7% 50 • Groupe Alliance des démocrates et des libéraux pour l’Europe – ALDE, • Groupe confédéral de la gauche unitaire européenne/gauche verte nordique – GUE/NGL, Greens/EF25.4% A • Groupe des verts/alliance libre européenne – Verts/ALE, 191 • Groupe Europe de la liberté et de la démocratie directe – EFDD, • Europe des nations et des libertés – ENF. S&D 6.9% 52 En outre, certains députés sont présents en tant que députés non inscrits (Non-inscrits – NI). EPRS | Service de recherche du Parlement européen GUE/NGL Auteur: Giulio Sabbati Service de recherche pour les députés PE 614.733 EPRS | Service de recherche du Parlement européen Taille des groupes politiques au Parlement européen par État membre (au 1er avril 2018) EPP S&D ECR ALDE Greens/EFA GUE/NGL EFD ENF NI_OTHER Verts/ GUE/ PPE S&D ECR ALDE ALE NGL EFDD ENF NI Total DE DE34 DE27 DE6 DE4 13DE DE8 DE1 DE1 DE2 96 Germany (DE) FR 20FR 13FR FR FR7 FR6 FR4 FR4 17FR FR3 74 France (FR) IT 15IT 31IT IT2 IT IT1 IT3 14IT IT6 IT1 73 Italy (IT) UK UK2 UK20 UK19 UK1 UK6 UK1 20UK UK1 UK3 73 United Kingdom (UK) ES 17ES 14ES ES ES8 ES5 10ES ES ES ES 54 Spain (ES) PL 22PL PL5 19PL PL PL PL PL1 PL2 PL2 51 Poland (PL) RO RO13 RO14 RO2 RO3 RO RO RO RO RO 32 Romania (RO) NL NL5 NL3 NL2 NL7 NL2 NL3 NL NL4 NL 26 Netherlands (NL) BE BE4 BE4 BE4 BE6 BE2 BE BE BE1 BE 21 Belgium (BE) CZ CZ7 CZ4 CZ2 CZ4 CZ CZ3 CZ1 CZ CZ 21 Czech Republic (CZ) EL EL5 EL4 EL1 EL EL EL6 EL EL EL5 21 Greece (GR) HU HU12 HU4 HU HU HU2 HU HU HU HU3 21 Hungary (HU) PT PT8 PT8 PT PT1 PT PT4 PT PT PT 21 Portugal (PT) SE SE4 SE6 SE SE3 SE4 SE1 SE2 SE SE 20 Sweden (SE) AT AT5 AT5 AT AT1 AT3 AT AT AT4 AT 18 Austria (AT) BG BG7 BG4 BG2 BG4 BG BG BG BG BG 17 Bulgaria (BG) DK DK1 DK3 DK3 DK3 DK1 DK1 DK DK DK1 13 Denmark (DK) SK SK6 SK4 SK3 SK SK SK SK SK SK 13 Slovakia (SK) FI FI3 FI2 FI2 FI4 FI1 FI1 FI FI FI 13 Finland (FI) IE IE4 IE1 IE1 IE1 IE IE4 IE IE IE 11 Ireland (IE) HR HR5 HR2 HR1 HR2 HR1 HR HR HR HR 11 Croatia (HR) LT LT3 LT2 LT1 LT3 LT1 LT LT1 LT LT 11 Lithuania (LT) LV LV4 LV1 LV1 LV1 LV1 LV LV LV LV 8 Latvia (LV) SI SI5 SI1 SI SI1 SI1 SI SI SI SI 8 Slovenia (SL) EE EE1 EE1 EE EE3 EE1 EE EE EE EE 6 Estonia (EE) CY CY1 CY2 CY1 CY CY CY2 CY CY CY 6 Cyprus (CY) LU LU3 LU1 LU LU1 LU1 LU LU LU LU 6 Luxembourg (LU) MT MT3 MT3 MT MT MT MT MT MT MT 6 Malta (MT) EU 012190203040 011890203040 01700203040 01680203040 52010203040 51010203040 44010203040 01360203040 20010203040 751 EU Verts/ GUE/ PPE S&D ECR ALDE ALE NGL EFDD ENF NI Total 29,2 % 25,2 % 9,5 % 9,0 % 6,9 % 6,8 % 5,9 % 4,8 % 2,6 % 100 % Informations transmises par l’unité Administration des députés, DG Présidence, du Parlement européen. Codes pays et drapeaux: Autriche (AT) Belgique (BE) Bulgarie (BG) Croatie (HR) Chypre (CY) Republic tchèque (CZ) Danemark (DK) Estonie (EE) Finlande (FI) France (FR) Allemagne (DE) Grèce (EL) Hongrie (HU) Irlande (IE) Italie (IT) Lettonie (LV) Lituanie (LT) Luxembourg (LU) Malte (MT) Pays-Bas (NL) Pologne (PL) Portugal (PT) Roumanie (RO) Slovaquie (SK) Slovénie (SI) Espagne (ES) Suède (SE) Royaume-Uni (UK) 2 Parlement européen: Faits et chiffres 1 étaitde55ansau desdéputés moyen L’âge duplusjeune. le plusâgéetcelui député du l’âge desdéputés, moyen l’âge membre, parÉtat montre, graphique Ce membre parÉtat desdéputés Âge faible (16,7%). étaitlaplus qu’elle auLuxembourg laplusforte (90,5%)etc’est proportion députés trouvait denouveaux que l’on enGrèce C’est déjàsiégé. en2014,tandisque51,5%avaient nouveaux 48,5%étaient Surles751députés, ropéen. eu jamaissiégéauParlement encore quin’ont lesdéputés d’entendre en2014,ilconvient députés nouveaux Par en2014 députés parrapport de total réélus etdedéputés aunombre députés denouveaux Pourcentage national. national. leur parlementoudegouvernement de membre endevenant par exemple européen, auParlement dedéputé celle avec desfonctions incompatibles exercer pour désignés été et50ont décédés 6sont démissionné, ont 36 députés motifs. pourdifférents remplacés été ont 92 députés 2018, avril 2014 et juillet Entre danois). plus jeune26ans(undéputé etle deGrèce) 91ans(undéputé âgé ayant leplus étaitde53ans, moyen 2014, l’âge dejuillet delasessionconstitutive Lors espagnol). etundéputé bulgare (un député etleplusjeune29ans français) (un député er avril 2018, le plus âgé ayant 89ans 2018,leplusâgéayant avril 100 50 0 % % % EL EL 9,5 % 90,5 % IT IT 32,9 % 67,1 % New MEPs CY CY 33,3 % 66,7 % CZCZ 33,3 % 66,7 % EE EE 33,3 % 66,7 % BGBG 41,2 % 58,8 % Re-elected MEPs SE SE 45,0 % 55,0 % IE IE 45,5 % 54,5 % NL NL 46,2 % 53,8 % ES ES 46,3 % 53,7 % PT PT 47,6 % 52,4 % MTMT 50,0 % 50,0 % SI SI 50,0 % 50,0 % EUEU 51,5 % 48,5 % HUHU 52,4 % 47,6 % EU28 HU MT RO DK HR UK BG DE CZ NL CY LU PL PL 52,9 % SK BE 47,1 % AT PT FR PL SE ES EE LV EL LT IT SI IE FI DKDK 53,8 % 46,2 % SK SK 53,8 % 46,2 % LU PL LT FR SK CY EL FI SI DE UK LV EU28 SE MT AT EE BE IE PT ES HR HU CZ IT NL RO DK BG 02 FR FR 54,1 % 45,9 % LT LT 54,5 % 45,5 % plus jeune AT AT 55,6 % 44,4 % Âge duÂge UKUK 57,5 % 42,5 % 04 29 29 29 30 30 BE BE 61,9 % 38,1 % 31 32 33 33 34 34 36 36 LV LV 62,5 % 37,5 % 37 38 39 39 39 40 40 42 41 41 42 42 RORO 43 62,5 % 37,5 % 44 Âge moyen Âge 46 06 HRHR 63,6 % 36,4 % 47 51 50 51 51 51 52 52 DEDE 68,8 % 31,3 % 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 57 57 57 57 58 58 59 FI FI 69,2 % 30,8 % 60 60 08 LU LU 83,3 % 16,7 % 61 64 65 65 67 68 69 69 69 plus âgé duÂge 70 71 0,0 0,5 1,0 72 73 73 74 74 74 74 75 75 75 78 78 78 78 79 0 Députés réélus Députés députés Nouveaux 81 89 89 100 Mi Di 3 n erenc - e EPRS | Service de recherche du Parlement européen Parlement européen, 1979-2014 Pondération des groupes politiques par législature Taille relative des groupes politiques au Parlement européen pour chacune des huit législatures depuis les pre- mières élections au suffrage direct en 1979.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lettera Sassoli Chiusura Parlamento IT.Pages
    8 marzo 2020 Caro Presidente Sassoli, Ti scriviamo per esprimere la nostra profonda preoccupazione per la diffusione della malattia infettiva causata dal coronavirus COVID-19 in Europa e per richiedere ulte- riori misure di sicurezza per salvaguardare i Membri del Parlamento europeo, il per- sonale e la popolazione locale. Come ben sai, il livello di emergenza legato alla diffusione di questo virus è note- volmente aumentato nel corso delle ultime ore: il numero di casi confermati si sta moltiplicando in molti Stati membri, compreso il Belgio, e sono state confermate nuove aree di contagio. Misure di sicurezza straordinarie sono state adottate dalle autorità pubbliche di tutta Europa e intere aree sono state messe in quarantena. Il numero di casi confermati è in costante aumento in Belgio e a Bruxelles e questa settimana abbiamo riscontrato i primi casi di nuovi coronavirus nelle istituzioni del- l'UE. Sebbene apprezziamo che siano già state adottate misure straordinarie per far fron- te a questa emergenza, riteniamo che la situazione in rapida evoluzione e i maggiori rischi per la salute richiedano ulteriori misure di sicurezza come l'immediata interru- zione di tutti i lavori parlamentari, compresa la prossima sessione plenaria, come misura precauzionale. Il Parlamento europeo, con oltre 5000 persone che vi lavorano e viaggiano regolar- mente tra la loro città natale e Bruxelles, ha il potenziale per diventare un focolaio di trasmissione del coronavirus. Con la presente ti chiediamo di sospendere tutte le attività parlamentari con effetto immediato, fino a quando i rischi per la salute legati alla diffusione del virus saranno sotto controllo.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Scorso Giugno L'organizzazione Internazionale Wikileaks Ha Pubblicato Una Presunta Bozza Dell'accordo Commerciale Sugli Scambi Di Servizi (Tisa)
    Lo scorso giugno l'organizzazione internazionale WikiLeaks ha pubblicato una presunta bozza dell'Accordo commerciale sugli scambi di servizi (TiSA). Tali rivelazioni, che denotano importanti conseguenze in merito alla privatizzazione di servizi fondamentali, come banche, sanità e istruzione, vanno ad aggiungersi alle analisi previste dai negoziati in atto, quali la disamina dei principi comuni per la regolamentazione dei servizi finanziari e la valutazione dei potenziali vantaggi per crescita e occupazione. L'UE ha inoltre pubblicato recentemente un concept paper che indica una struttura dell'accordo basata su un approccio modulare simile a quello utilizzato per il ciclo negoziale di Doha. Per giunta l'accordo, oltre ad essere delineato con marginale trasparenza, potrebbe, secondo le disposizioni, non essere rivelato per i cinque anni successivi alla sua approvazione. A tal proposito, può la Commissione indicare: — come il TiSA determinerà le politiche economiche dei maggiori paesi a capitalismo avanzato e se i parlamenti degli Stati interessati verranno coinvolti; — quali benefici concreti potranno avverarsi per crescita e occupazione, e come il disciplinamento delle attività finanziarie e dei servizi summenzionati verrà alterato; — se ritiene che l'approccio strutturale indicato possa portare a un risultato fallimentare come accaduto per il Doha Round e se, in omaggio alla trasparenza, prevede una consultazione pubblica relativamente ai dieci cicli di negoziati che avranno luogo quest'autunno? Marco Valli (EFDD) , Tiziana Beghin (EFDD) , David Borrelli (EFDD) , Fabio Massimo Castaldo (EFDD) , Ignazio Corrao (EFDD) , Laura Ferrara (EFDD) , Dario Tamburrano (EFDD) , Marco Zanni (EFDD) Secondo quanto riferito di recente da diversi comunicati stampa, la Commissione potrebbe approvare il piano di aiuti di Stato del Regno Unito a favore della centrale nucleare «Hinkley Point C».
    [Show full text]
  • 034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/10/20
    034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/10/20 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 October 2020 (OR. en) 11625/20 PE-QE 184 'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee Subject: Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament – Examination by Coreper The Permanent Representatives Committee is invited to examine the draft replies to the questions for written answer set out in the documents listed in the Annex to this note. Pursuant to Article 12(2)(a) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the Presidency intends to propose the use of the 'silence procedure' to adopt the texts of the replies to the abovementioned questions for written answer. 11625/20 PZ/vp 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament a) E-003883/2020 - Radka Maxová (Renew), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Dragoș Pîslaru (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL), Leszek Miller (S&D), Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Elżbieta Kruk (ECR), Demetris Papadakis (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Viktor Uspaskich (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
    [Show full text]
  • B-1047 Bruxelles - Tel +32 2 28 45782 F-67070 Strasburgo - Tel +33 3 88 1 75782 [email protected]
    Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission B - 1049 Brussels Brussels, 16 May 2020 Dear President, We welcomed your proposals for the tourism compartment, presented on 13 May. The sector has been affected in severe ways by this unexpected crisis, and we need a strong support to help the workers and the families depending by one of the most important economic field in Europe. Nevertheless, we need an additional effort from the Commission in order to prevent any discrimination between Member States. In fact, the “Communication towards a phased and coordinated approach for restoring freedom of movement and lifting internal border controls” (C(2020)3250) states that “Measures to be taken at national level to gradually lift travel restrictions should take into consideration [...] the assessment of approximation of epidemiological situations in the Member States”. That could cause some discrimination, and could also give the possibility to create internal bilateral agreements penalizing some Member States. Of course, we need to keep the health security as priority, and to put in place every measure to control and prevent the spreading of the epidemic, but, at the same time, we need a strong coordination by European Commission to prevent any form of bilateral agreements against the principles of the internal market. Hence, we asks the Commission to block any form of “tourism corridors” between Member States that could affect a fair restoration of the market. Yours sincerely, Mario Furore, Member of European Parliament, Isabella Adinolfi, Member of European Parliament, Tiziana Beghin, Member of European Parliament, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Member of European Parliament, Ignazio Corrao, Member of European Parliament, Chiara Gemma, Member of European Parliament, Laura Ferrara, Member of European Parliament, B-1047 Bruxelles - Tel +32 2 28 45782 F-67070 Strasburgo - Tel +33 3 88 1 75782 [email protected] - www.europarl.europa.eu .
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 30/07/2021 Ms. Ursula Von Der Leyen President of The
    Brussels, 30/07/2021 Ms. Ursula Von Der Leyen President of the European Commission Sent via email to: [email protected] Mr. Josep Borrell Vice President of the European Commission/High Representative Sent via email to: [email protected] To the President of the Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen, To the Vice President of the Commission/High Representative Josep Borrell, We, undersigned members of the European Parliament, are writing you to bring your attention to the alarming human rights and humanitarian situation in Jammu and Kashmir. The miseries of the people of Jammu and Kashmir have been amply documented in the International Human Rights Watch World Report 2021 as well as the reports of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2018 and 2019. This Indian-administered region had already suffered a debilitating lockdown since the revocation of its special status in 2019, and the restraints on the rights to movement, access to information, health care, education as well as free speech have been intensified by the Covid-19 pandemic. Journalists and human rights defenders have been increasingly targeted for raising their voice in support of the Kashmiri people and denounce their situation. Arbitrary detentions continue, public assembly is still prohibited under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC) and hundreds, including minors and several elected legislators of Jammu and Kashmir, remain under preventive detention. Unfortunately, a number of legislations introduced by the Indian governments over the years to prevent terrorism and separatism, including the Special Powers Act (SPA), the Armed Forces Special Protection Act (AFSPA) and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), have been often misused against the Kashmiri population.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautical Products in the Single Market Under COVID-19 Brussels, April
    Nautical products in the Single Market under COVID-19 Brussels, April 28th 2020 To the attention of the Commissioner for the Internal Market, Mr. Thierry Breton, Dear Commissioner, The current internal EU border closures are producing widespread negative effects on the nautical sector and on the delivery of its products. The sector employs 280.000 workers across the EU and 95% of its companies are SMEs, supporting local jobs. It is therefore essential that these companies continue to deliver to customers. Maintaining production is capital for the liquidity of manufacturers and all companies along the supply chain, which supports jobs in an industry that is already severely affected by COVID-19. Any negative impact will be particularly felt in coastal and peripheral regions, islands, and along inland waterways where companies from the sector are primarily located. As this sector has a strong seasonal nature, it is essential that it is supported at EU and national level. One of the most severe limitation for nautical companies nowadays concerns the means of delivery of the final products. Several Member States have obliged companies to use lorries for deliveries as a reaction to the COVID-19 outbreak, but it should be noted that recreational boats cannot always be transported by lorry. We therefore urge you to protect the Single Market, the liquidity of its enterprises and jobs by clarifying that delivery of nautical products should be possible by whichever means suitable. This should include delivery of boats directly by sea, lorry, trailer, and collection by the customer, avoiding any excessive measures or additional burden.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: Facts and Figures
    BRIEFING October 2019 European Parliament: Facts and Figures This Briefing, published by the European Parliamentary Research Service, is designed to provide key facts and figures about the European Parliament, both in the 2019 to 2024 parliamentary term now starting - and in the eight previous terms since direct elections were introduced in June 1979. On the following pages you will find graphics of various kinds which: • detail the composition of the European Parliament now and in the past; • trace the increase in the number of parties represented in the EP and evolution of political groups; • chart the rise in the number of women sitting in the Parliament; • explain the electoral systems used in the 2019 elections to the Parliament across the Member States; • show how turnout in European elections compares with that in national elections; • summarise the activity of the Parliament in the current and previous five-year terms; • outline the composition of the Parliament’s committees and governing bodies. The Briefing will be updated regularly over the coming term to take account of latest developments. European Parliament, 2019-24 Size of the political groups Proportion of Members in each political group Number of MEPs in each political group as of Share by political group of the total 748 Members in the 1 October 2019. Parliament. Renew Europe: 14.4% EPP: 24.3% 182 154 108 Greens/EFA: 9.9% 74 73 62 54 41 ECR: 8.3% 748 EPP S&D Renew Greens/ ID ECR GUE/ NI S&D: 20.6% MEPs * Europe EFA NGL ID: 9.8% 748 GUE/NGL: 5.5% NI: 7.2% MEPs Note: The Spanish authorities have not yet notied the Parliament of the Members elected to three seats; therefore the total does not reach the 751 provid- ed for in EU law.
    [Show full text]
  • Claves Del Inicio Del Ciclo Institucional Europeo 2019-2024
    CLAVES DEL INICIO DEL CICLO INSTITUCIONAL EUROPEO 2019-2024 NOTA 24 de julio de 2019 Delegación Permanente ante la UE INDICE Resumen Ejecutivo. 1. Introducción 2. Parlamento Europeo: IX Legislatura a) Grupos políticos europeos en el Hemiciclo b) Órganos de gobierno c) Órganos de trabajo 3. Decisión sobre la distribución de altos cargos en las Instituciones Europeas 4. Conclusiones 5. Anexos a) Cuadro con las presidencias de las Comisiones parlamentarias y los miembros españoles que figuran en ellas b) Eurodiputados españoles en las Delegaciones parlamentarias c) Vicepresidentes y Cuestores del Parlamento Europeo d) Cuadro de posibles coaliciones en el pleno del Parlamento europeo 2 Resumen Ejecutivo ✓ El ciclo institucional europeo 2019-2024 comenzó con la Sesión Constitutiva de la IX Legislatura del Parlamento Europeo del 2 al 4 de julio, una vez celebrado un Consejo Europeo extraordinario de casi tres días de duración, del 30 de junio al 2 de julio, en el que los 28 Jefes de Estado y/o Gobierno acordaron la distribución de los puestos de máxima responsabilidad dentro de la UE: presidencias de la Comisión Europea, del Consejo Europeo y del Banco Central Europeo, más el puesto de Alto Representante de Política Exterior y de Seguridad Común. ✓ Las designaciones realizadas, así como la composición del nuevo Parlamento Europeo (Mesa y Comisiones) reflejan, por un lado, la mayor diversidad política resultante de los comicios europeos de mayo y, por otro, el equilibrio alcanzado entre los criterios geográficos, de interés nacional, adscripción política y de género para conformar un equipo directivo capaz de gestionar con solvencia las Instituciones europeas durante los próximos cinco años: o El Partido Popular Europeo – PPE, que fue el más votado pese a pasar de 216 a 182 escaños, consiguió los puestos más sustanciales, la Comisión Europea y el Banco Central Europeo.
    [Show full text]
  • Stampa Preferenze Candidati Di Lista
    COMUNE DI SAN MARCELLO PITEGLIO Consultazioni del 26 maggio 2019 Parlamento Europeo PREFERENZE CANDIDATI DI LISTA Sezioni 15 su 15 Elettori Votanti Maschi 3515 Maschi 2038 - 57.98% Femmine 3906 Femmine 2067 - 52.92% Totale 7421 Totale 4105 - 55.32% Totale voti delle liste 3965 % sul totale % sui voti Lista / Candidato Voti delle liste della lista LEGA 1411 35.59% 1 Matteo SALVINI 225 5.67% 15.95% 2 Simona Renata BALDASSARRE 1 0.03% 0.07% 3 Matteo ADINOLFI 5 0.13% 0.35% 4 Jacopo ALBERTI 11 0.28% 0.78% 5 Leo BOLLETTINI 0 0.00% 0.00% 6 Anna BONFRISCO detta Cinzia 5 0.13% 0.35% 7 Susanna CECCARDI 44 1.11% 3.12% 8 Mauro LUCENTINI 0 0.00% 0.00% 9 Stefano PASTORELLI 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Angelo PAVONCELLO 0 0.00% 0.00% 11 Francesca PEPPUCCI 0 0.00% 0.00% 12 Luisa REGIMENTI 11 0.28% 0.78% 13 Antonio Maria RINALDI 18 0.45% 1.28% 14 Maria Veronica ROSSI 1 0.03% 0.07% 15 Elena VIZZOTTO 2 0.05% 0.14% Totale preferenze di lista 323 8.15% 22.89% % sul totale % sui voti Lista / Candidato Voti delle liste della lista DESTRE UNITE CASAPOUND 15 0.38% 1 Simone DI STEFANO 1 0.03% 6.67% 2 Carlotta CHIARALUCE 2 0.05% 13.33% 3 Sara BENIGNI 0 0.00% 0.00% 4 Piergiorgio BONOMI 0 0.00% 0.00% 5 Sergio FUCITO 1 0.03% 6.67% 6 Elisa GASPARRONI 0 0.00% 0.00% 7 Arianna GRANDINETTI 0 0.00% 0.00% 8 Cristina IACOVACCI 0 0.00% 0.00% 9 Gian Piero JOIME 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Giuseppe LAVALLE 0 0.00% 0.00% 11 Nunziata PROVITINA 0 0.00% 0.00% 12 Chiara Ambra ROMANO 0 0.00% 0.00% 13 Michele SGARIGLIA 0 0.00% 0.00% Augusto SINAGRA Pagina 1 Realizzato da EivaWeb COMUNE DI SAN MARCELLO PITEGLIO
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-003868/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Radka Maxová (Renew), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Dragoș Pîslaru (Renew), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL), Leszek Miller (S&D), Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Elżbieta Kruk (ECR), Demetris Papadakis (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Viktor Uspaskich (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE), Katrin Langensiepen (Verts/ALE), Cindy Franssen (PPE), Sylvie Brunet (Renew), Ádám Kósa (PPE), Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (Renew), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (NI), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (NI), Clara Ponsatí Obiols (NI), Atidzhe Alieva-Veli (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), José Gusmão (GUE/NGL), Krzysztof Hetman (PPE), Miriam Dalli (S&D), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (ECR), Alviina Alametsä (Verts/ALE), Brando Benifei (S&D) Subject: Disability focal points Already in 2015, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in its Concluding Observations recommended that disability focal points be appointed in all Commission Directorates-General (DGs) and agencies, in all EU institutions, together with the establishment of an interinstitutional coordination mechanism. The recommendation also forms part of several European Parliament resolutions 1 , and it has also been made by the European Economic and Social Committee. In spite of this, disability focal points have not yet been established. The only exception to this is the Commission’s UN CRPD in the Disability Unit of DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion 2 .
    [Show full text]