DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Norwich Site Submission Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Norwich Site Submission Form Greater Norwich Site Submission Form FOR OFF ICIAL USEONLY Response Number: Date Received: This form is to be filled out by any interested parties who want to promote a site for a specific use or development to be allocated in the Greater Norwich Local Plan. Only one form should be submitted for each individual site i.e. it is not necessary for a separate form to be completed for each landowner on a single site in multiple ownerships. However, a separate form must be completed for each individual site submitted. Your completed form should be returned to the Greater Norwich Local Plan team: By email: [email protected] Or, if it is not possible submit the form electronically, By Post to: Greater Norwich Local Plan Team PO Box 3466 Norwich NR7 7NX The site submissions received as part of the Greater Norwich Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation will be published and made available for public viewing. By submitting this form you are consenting to the details about you and your individual site(s) being stored by Norfolk County Council and shared with Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council, and that the details of the site will be published for consultation purposes. Under the (GDPR) General Data Protection Regulation Norfolk County Council will be the data controller. Further advice and guidance can be obtained by visiting the Greater Norwich Local Plan website or by contacting the Greater Norwich Local Plan team directly: Website: www.gnlp.org.uk E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 01603 306603 1a. Contact Details Title MR First Name Martin Last Name Ranner Job Title (where relevant) Director Organisation (where Sworders relevant) Address 11 Holkham Studios, Longlands, Holkham Estate, Wells-next-the-Sea, Norfolk. Post Code NR23 1SH Telephone Number 01328 854400 Email Address [email protected] 1b. I am… Owner of the site Parish/Town Council Developer Community Group Land Agent Local Resident Planning Consultant Registered Social Landlord Yes. Other (please specify): 1c. Client/Landowner Details (if different from question 1a) Title Mr First Name Michael Last Name Rutterford Job Title (where relevant) Organisation (where relevant) Address Post Code Telephone Number Email Address 2. Site Details Site location / address and post Land Opposite Post Office Lane, Weston code Longville, Norwich, Norfolk. (please include as an attachment A 1:1250 Scale Site Location Plan and 1:500 to this response form a location Scale Indicative Layout Plan of the site are plan of the site on a scaled OS included with this submission. base with the boundaries of the site clearly shown) Grid reference (if known) Site area (hectares) 0.65 Site Ownership 3a. I (or my client)…. Do/Does not own (or hold Is the sole owner of the Is a part owner of the site any legal interest in) the site site whatsoever Yes 3b. Please provide the name, address and contact details of the site’s landowner(s) and attach copies of all relevant title plans and deeds (if available). Mr Michael Rutterford C/O Agent. 3c. If the site is in multiple landownerships do all Yes No landowners support your proposal for the site? 3d. If you answered no to the above question please provide details of why not all of the sites owners support your proposals for the site. N/A Current and Historic Land Uses 4a. Current Land Use (Please describe the site’s current land use e.g. agriculture, employment, unused/vacant etc.) Agriculture. 4b. Has the site been previously Yes No developed? No 4c. Describe any previous uses of the site. (please provide details of any relevant historic planning applications, including application numbers if known) Historical Agricultural Use. Proposed Future Uses 5a. Please provide a short description of the development or land use you proposed, including stating if it is for a settlement boundary revision (if you are proposing a site to be designated as local green space please go directly to question 6). The proposal is for the site to be allocated with up to ni ne dwellings, although numbers could be flexible. An indicative layout plan accompanies the submission, which depicts a development of nine dwellings comprising a single detached dwelling with the remainder semi-detached, all set back from the highway frontage allowing generous levels of soft landscaping. This mirrors development opposite, which comprises both semi-detached and detached dwellings of two storey construction, although there are some bungalows located to the south of Post Office Lane. 5b. Which of the following use or uses are you proposing? Market Housing Business and offices Recreation & Leisure Yes Affordable Housing General industrial Community Use Residential Care Home Storage and distribution Public Open Space Gypsy and Traveller Tourism Other (Please Specify) Pitches 5c. Please provide further details of your proposal, including details on number of houses and proposed floorspace of commercial buildings etc. The proposal seeks an allocation of up to nine market dwellings, although this total can be flexible. 5d. Please describe any benefits to the Local Area that the development of the site could provide. The site can deliver much needed rural housing, which will be of social and economic benefit to the village and local area and to that of the wellbeing and vitality of the village and its community. The sites development is not encumbered by any constraints that could delay or prevent its development and this site can quickly deliver and contribute to new housing within the district in accordance with the provisions of the NPPF. Local Green Space If you are proposed a site to be designated as Local Green Space please complete the following questions. These questions do not need to be completed if you are not proposing a site as Local Green Space. Please consult the guidance notes for an explanation of Local Green Space Designations. 6a. Which community would the site serve and how would the designation of the site benefit that community. 6b. Please describe why you consider the site to be of particular local significance e.g. recreational value, tranquillity or richness in wildlife. Site Features and Constraints Are there any features of the site or limitations that may constrain development on this site (please give details)? No. 7a. Site Access: Is there a current means of access to the site from the public highway, does this access need to be improved before development can take place and are there any public rights of way that cross or adjoin the site? The public highway that serves the site, is subject to a 20mph speed limit and also physical traffic calming features in the form of a ‘chicane’. A speed survey and highway Impact Appraisal has been undertaken by commissioned highway consultants ‘Bancroft Consulting’ who have produced a statement, which accompanies this submission. The site benefits from an existing field access, although a new vehicular access is proposed, which has been designed to allow for appropriate visibility splays to be achieved and due regard to the recommendations of the Norfolk County Councils adopted standards and ‘Manual for Streets’. The appraisal demonstrates that a satisfactory access arrangement can be delivered to serve the proposed dwellings, in accordance with paragraph 108 of the revised NPPF. There are no public right of ways either across or adjoining the site. 7b. Topography: Are there any slopes or significant changes of in levels that could affect the development of the site? No 7c. Ground Conditions: Are ground conditions on the site stable? A re there potential ground contamination issues? The ground conditions are stable and to the best of our knowledge there are no ground contamination issues. 7d. Flood Risk: Is the site liable to river, ground water or surface water flood ing and if so what is the nature, source and frequency of the flooding? The site is not liable to flooding. 7e. Legal Issues: Is the re land in third party ownership, or access rights , which must be acquired to develop the site, do any restrictive covenants exist, are there any existing tenancies? No 7f. Environmental Issues: Is the site located next to a watercourse or mature woodland, are there any significant trees or hedgerows crossing or bordering the site are there any known features of ecological or geological importance on or adjacent to the site? The site is active agricultural land of an open nature, that is likely to be of limited value in biodiversity terms, and so will not constitute a constraint that will prevent its development. 7g. Heritage Issues: Are there any listed buildings, Conservation Areas, His toric Parklands or Schedules Monuments on the site or nearby? If so, how might the site’s development affect them? There are four Heritage Assets within the village. These are the Spread Eagle PH (II), Church Farmhouse (II), the War Memorial (II) and Church of All Saints (I). However, all are located in a relatively concentrated area, within the historic core of the village, approximately 110 to 160 metres to the north of the site. Due to the existing built form separating the site and the Heritage Assets, their setting will be unaffected including the views of the Heritage Assets and the space within which they are experienced. Importantly, the proposed development will not impact or obscure any distant views of the Grade I church tower. 7h. Neighbouring Uses: What are the neighbouring uses and will either the proposed use or neighbouring uses have any implications? Existing residential properties neighbour the northern and western boundaries. The indicative layout of the dwellings has been prepared to minimise any impacts on the existing residential properties located in close proximity to the site in order to ensure that no significant harm is caused to current levels of residential amenity in terms of loss of privacy, outlook, daylight/sunlight etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • A Frettenham Map
    GNLP0190 GNLP0181 GNLP0582 GNLP0512 GNLP0512 A Hainford CP GNLP0065 Horstead with Stanninghall CP Frettenham CP GNLP0492 GNLP0085 Horsham St. Faith and Newton St. Faith CP GREATER NORWICH LOCAL PLAN Key Map set showing Submitted Submitted Sites ± Sites in Frettenham Parish Broads Authority Boundary ( where applicable ) Crostwick CP 1:10,000 Spixworth CP Parish Boundary © Crown Copyright and database right 2016.Ordnance Survey: Broadland District Council - 100022319 Norwich City Council - 100019747 South Norfolk District Council - 100019483 FRETTENHAM MAP SET GP 1.22m RH ED & Ward B dy MILL ROA D 18.6m FB White House Pon ds Pon d Drain Holey well Barn Drain Path (um) Flore nc e Playing Field CH UR C H LA NE Cottage Long Plantation Sta bl e View Cottage Mas ons 15.9m Sta bl e Cottage View Pon d CHURCH ROAD Barn Aca cia Cottage Brac ken Cottage Hall Horstead with Stanninghall CP Grov e Cottage Fa irfi eld 3 Valley Farm Cedar Cottages FRETTENHAM ROAD BUXTON ROAD Pon d The G rang e 1 GP Crown B arn Pon d Rose an d Crown 19.6m 64 (PH ) 50 CR Haw thorn Cottage The Bungalow Rose Cotta ge 2 1 3 48 The Pound Garage Walter 60 Fie ld MILL 11 7 46 Barns FIE LD 40 9 Guide Post COU RT Pon d Mill Fa rm Hainford CP 15.1m 18.1m Lodge Mill View Pon d 54 Grove Farm Drain 1 19.5m Pon d Hainford Place 36 Letter GNLP0065 Box MILL ROA D 34 1 50 The Studio Silos Mill Farm 10 The Willows Pond 42 11 SHIRLEY CLOSE 48 44 6 1.22m RH 6 40 32 Birbeck Way 46 Beulah Cas a M ia Farm 1 16 SCHOOL RO AD Pon d 34 2 27 Thatched Track Cottage Pon d Guide Post RED ME RE CLOSE
    [Show full text]
  • Inspectors Report Into the Examination of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk
    Report to the Greater Norwich Development Partnership [Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council, South Norfolk Council and Norfolk County Council] by Roy Foster MA MRTPI and Mike Fox BA DipTP MRTPI Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date 22 February 2011 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004, SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION OF THE JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH & SOUTH NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT Document submitted for examination on 5 March 2010 Examination hearings held between 9 November and 9 December 2010 File Ref: PINS/G2625/429/3 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT AA Appropriate Assessment AAP Area Action Plan AH Affordable Housing AMR Annual Monitoring Report AWS Anglian Water Services BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio BRT Bus Rapid Transit CABE Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment CBR Core Bus Route CIF Community Infrastructure Fund CIL Community Infrastructure Levy CSH Code for Sustainable Homes DCLG Department for Communities & Local Government DfT Department for Transport DJD Drivers Jonas Deloitte DPD Development Plan Document EEP East of England Plan EPIC East of England Production Innovation Centre EUV Established Use Value FC Focussed Changes GI Green Infrastructure GNDP Greater Norwich Development Partnership HD Habitats Directive HGV Heavy Goods Vehicles HMA Housing Market Assessment IC Inspectors’ Changes JCS Joint Core Strategy KSC Key Service Centre LDS Local Development Scheme LIPP Local Infrastructure Plan and Programme MSBC
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – Correct As of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford &A
    CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – correct as of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford & Wramplingham Barnham Broom Bawburgh Bergh Apton Bracon Ash and Hethel Brockdish Broome Colney Costessey Cringleford Dickleburgh and Rushall Diss Framingham Pigot Forncett Gissing Great Melton Hempnall Hethersett Hingham Keswick and Intwood Kirby Cane and Ellingham Langley with Hardley Marlingford and Colton Mulbarton Rockland St Mary with Hellington Saxlingham Nethergate Scole Shelfanger Shelton and Hardwick Shotesham Stockton Surlingham Thurlton Thurton Thwaite St Mary Tivetshall St Margaret Tivetshall St Mary Trowse with Newton Winfarthing Wreningham Broadland Acle Attlebridge Beighton Blofield Brandiston Buxton with Lamas Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Coltishall Drayton Felthorpe Frettenham Great Witchingham Hainford Hemblington Hevingham Honingham Horsford Horsham St Faiths Lingwood and Burlingham Reedham Reepham Ringland Salhouse Stratton Strawless Strumpshaw Swannington with Alderford and Little Witchingham Upton with Fishley Weston Longville Wood Dalling Woodbastwick Total = 72 Total parishes in Broadland & South Norfolk = 181 % signed = 39.8% Breckland Ashill Banham Bintree Carbrooke Caston Colkirk Cranworth East Tuddenham Foulden Garveston, Reymerston & Thuxton Gooderstone Great Ellingham Harling Hockering Lyng Merton Mundford North Tuddenham Ovington Rocklands Roudham & Larling Saham Toney Scoulton Stow Bedon & Breckles Swaffham Weeting with Broomhill Whinburgh & Westfield Wretham Yaxham Great Yarmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Broadland Village Clusters – Site Summaries
    BROADLAND VILLAGE CLUSTERS – SITE SUMMARIES 1 BLOFIELD HEATH & HEMBLINGTON CLUSTER STRATEGY QUESTION: BLOFIELD HEATH & HEMBLINGTON OVERVIEW SETTLEMENT/ SITE REFERENCE: TOTAL NUMBER OF 11 REPRESENTATIONS: SUPPORT/ OBJECT/ COMMENT 1 Support, 2 Object, 8 Comment BREAKDOWN: The Blofield Heath and Hemblington cluster has 1 c/f allocation (BLO5), 1 preferred site (1048), 0 reasonable alternatives and 5 sites which are judged to be unreasonable. Main issues: • Preferred Site GNLP1048 – site promoter questions whether a larger number of homes on the site could be appropriate. Blofield Parish Council suggest looking at the Renenergy scheme and implications for the size of the site. • Unreasonable site GNLP2080 now has planning permission Sites not commented on through the consultation: Unreasonable Residential Sites • GNLP0099 • GNLP0288 • GNLP0300 • GNLP2172 2 Blofield Heath and Hemblington Cluster – General Comments STRATEGY QUESTION: Blofield Heath – Title SETTLEMENT/ SITE REFERENCE: (General Comments) TOTAL NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIONS: 1 SUPPORT/ OBJECT/ COMMENT 0 Support, 0 Object, 1 Comment BREAKDOWN: RESPONDENT SUPPORT/ BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS MAIN ISSUES DRAFT GNLP PROPOSED (OR GROUP OF OBJECT/ REQUIRING RESPONSE CHANGE TO RESPONDENTS) COMMENT INVESTIGATION PLAN Blofield Parish Comment • Site on Blofield Corner Road shouldn’t be Comments noted None Council approved as drainage strategy is into a blind ditch, it would be useful to link that evidence to this response. Due to drainage, not much has been done on site. • The site beside Heathlands on Woodbastwick Road also proposes to link up to this drainage path, there’s the issue of whether that also renders this site unworkable because of drainage. • The drainage strategy passed for Dawsons Lane is non-compliant and site specific for 12 properties and a small section of adoptable road, rest to be porous brick within the development itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk. Salhouse
    'DIRECTORY.] NORFOLK. SALHOUSE. 3~5 -of), Honingham, Horsford, Horsham St. Faith's, Horstead Horsham St. Faith's; deputy, Richard Eglington, Hors- with Stanninghall, Morton-on-the-Hill, Rackheath, Ring- sham St. Faith's aand, Salhouse, Spixworth, Sprowston, Swanington, Registrar of Births & Deaths, Western division, George 'Taverham, Weston Longville, \Vitchinghams (Great &; Hogarth Gedge, St. Faith's ; Eastern division, Thomas Little) & Wroxham. The population of the union in I8gi Johnston, Sprowston; deputy, I<'. Andrews, Sprowston was 12,183; area, 49,256 acres; rateable value in 18g6 Registrars of Marriages, George Hogarth Gedge, St. Faith's £60,593 The Workhouse, half a mile north-east of the churoh, & Clerk tu the Guardians & Assessment Committee, G. R. erected in 1805, is a large structure of red brick, capable Cooke, Norwich of holding 5oo inmates; Alfred Barker, master, Mrs. Treasurer, Henry Birkbeck, Norwich Barker. matron; Rev. Josiah Descarrieres Ballance M.A. • Relieving, Vaccination & School Inquiry Officers, Eastern chaplain; Robert J. Horn L.R.C.P.Edin. medical officer. district, Thomas J ohnson, Sprowston : Western district, The workhouse children attend the National School George Hogarth Gedge, Horsham St. Faith's School Attendance Committee. JHedical Officers & Pubhc Vaccinators, Frettenham district, H. Taylor L.R.C.P.Edin. Wroxham; ~orwich district, Meets at Workhouse, wednesday, fortnightly. Ernest W. Everett, 6o Pitt street, Norwich; St. Faith's Clerk, George R. Cooke, Norwich district, Robert James Horn L.R.C.P.Edin., Horsham St. Attendance Officers, George Hogarth Gedge, St. Faith's; Faith's; Western district, William Henry Griffith-Williams Thomas J ohnson, Constitution place, Sprowston L.R.C·P.Edin.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals Document
    Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals document Contents Page Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Settlement Summaries and Sites 12 3 Broadland 12 o Horsford 56 o Acle 16 o Horsham & Newton St. Faiths 61 o Attlebridge 17 o Horstead & Stanninghall 64 o Aylsham 21 o Lingwood & Burlingham 65 o Beighton 22 o Marsham 68 o Blofield 24 o Panxworth 71 o Blofield Heath 26 o Postwick 72 o Brundall 28 o Rackheath 75 o Buxton with Lamas 30 o Reedham 78 o Cantley 31 o Reepham 79 o Cawston 33 o Salhouse 83 o Coltishall & Horstead 35 o South Walsham 87 o Crostwick 36 o Spixworth 89 o Drayton 40 o Sprowston 90 o Felthorpe 41 o Strumpshaw 94 o Foulsham 43 o Taverham 96 o Frettenham 44 o Thorpe St. Andrew 98 o Gt & Lt Plumstead 47 o Weston Longville 101 o Gt Witchingham & Lenwade 49 o Woodbastwick 102 o Hainford 51 o Wroxham 103 o Hellesdon 53 o Hevingham 54 o Honningham 2 4 Norwich 105 5 South Norfolk 125 X o Alpington & Yelverton 125 o Hingham 226 o Ashby St Mary 126 o Keswick 230 o Aslacton 127 o Ketteringham 232 o Ashwellthorpe & Fundenhall 130 o Kirby Cane 234 o 132 236 Barford o Little Melton o Barnham Broom 134 o Loddon & Chedgrave 240 o Bawburgh 136 o Long Stratton 244 o Bergh Apton 139 o Marlingford & Colton 247 o Bixley 142 o Morley 250 o Bracon Ash 144 o Mulbarton 252 o Bramerton 147 o Mundham 254 o Bressingham 148 o Needham 255 o Brockdish (inc Thorpe Abbotts) 149 o Newton Flotman 257 o Brooke 150 o Norton Subcourse 259 o Broome 153 o Poringland 260 o Bunwell 155 o Pulham Market 265 o Burston and Shimpling 158 o Pulham St Mary 267 o Caistor St Edmund
    [Show full text]
  • Acle Bure Loddon North Flegg Wroxham Blofield & Brundall Lothingland Breydon Waveney Valley Hoveton North Caister & Orme
    Hoveton Horning Ludham Martham Repps with Bastwick Hemsby East Flegg Hoveton St Benet's Hoveton Hoveton & Tunstead Thurne West Flegg Rollesby Ormesby St. Michael Division Wroxham North Caister & Ormesby Arrangements for Wroxham Acle Woodbastwick Ashby with Oby Ormesby Ormesby St. Margaret with Scratby North Flegg County Filby Fleggburgh District Blofield with South Walsham Caister North Parish South Walsham Upton with Fishley Caister-on-Sea Proposed Electoral Division Fleggburgh District/Borough Plumstead Hemblington Caister South Council Ward Bure West Caister Mautby Stokesby with Herringby Blofield Acle Acle Yarmouth North Blofield & Brundall Lingwood & Burlingham Burlingham Brundall Central & Northgate Halvergate Yarmouth North & Central Beighton Southtown & Cobholm Surlingham Strumpshaw Acle Yare Brundall Bradwell North Marshes Freethorpe Burgh Castle Breydon Rockland St. Mary Claydon Thorpe Hamlet Bradwell St. Andrews Thorpe Hamlet Cantley, Limpenhoe & Southwood Rockland Magdalen Claxton Reedham Hellington Magdalen Carleton St. Peter Lothingland Loddon Haddiscoe Bradwell South & Hopton Ashby St. Mary Belton with Browston Langley with Hardley Thurlton Gorleston Loddon & Chedgrave Lothingland This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the Hopton-on-Sea permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Fritton & St. Olaves Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Thurton Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and Brooke Waveney Valley database right. Norton Subcourse Bergh Apton The Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Decisions Weekly List
    Weekly List - Decisions Parish Aylsham Application Number 20210530 Development Address 16 Mill Road,Aylsham,NR11 6DU Development Description Erection of Porch Outside New Front Door and Single Storey Rear Extension Decision Full Approval Decision Date 13/08/2021 Application Number 20210690 Development Address 2 Pound Lane,Aylsham,NR11 6DR Development Description Side extension to detached house and cart shed car port with a 2.2m boundary wall (Amends Planning Permission 20201610 by moving side extension further forward and extending cart shed car port) Decision Full Approval Decision Date 10/08/2021 Application Number 20210949 Development Address 47 Hungate Street,Aylsham,NR11 6AA Development Description Demolition & removal of existing rear lean-to & erection of single storey rear extension Decision Full Approval Decision Date 12/08/2021 Application Number 20211104 Development Address 47 Hungate Street,Aylsham,NR11 6AA Development Description Demolition & removal of existing rear lean-to & erection of single storey rear extension (Listed Building) Decision Listed Building Approval Decision Date 12/08/2021 Application Number 20211113 Development Address 30 Market Place,Aylsham,NR11 6EN Development Description Installation of new signage & projecting sign to Red Lion Street elevation Decision Listed Building Approval Decision Date 12/08/2021 Application Number 20211284 Development Address Emmanuel Church,White Hart Street,Aylsham,NR11 6HG Development Description Change of full roof light window in school house section of building to two
    [Show full text]
  • Land Adjacent to Church Farm Barn Weston Longville for Red Frog
    Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn, Weston Longville Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement (discharge of condition no11) Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn Weston Longville for Red Frog Developments Ltd. 20 September 2017 20 September 2017 Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn, Weston Longville Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement Client Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn Red Frog Developments Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement Ltd. (discharge of condition no11) 7 Fern Drive Cringleford Norwich NR4 7JT Planning authority Broadland District Council 1 Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Document Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement Version 1.0 Date 20 September 2017 Author Diane Megias B.Sc (Hons), Grad CIEEM, Natural England Bat Survey Licence level 1 Reviewer Etienne Swarts B. Compt (Hons) F Deg Sc ACIEEM Natural England licences (Bat survey level 2, Great crested newt level 2, Hazel dormouse level 1) Signed disclosure The information, data, advice and opinions provided in this report which I have provided is true and has been prepared in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. I confirm that the opinions expressed are my true and professional bona fide opinions. Etienne Swarts, ACIEEM Greenlight Environmental Consultancy Limited Diss Business Hub Hopper Way Diss Norfolk IP22 4GT www.greenlightco.co.uk 23 August 2017 1 Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn, Weston Longville Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Summary of ecological features and mitigation measures 3 3 Bibliography 5 Appendix A Examples of bat and bird boxes Appendix B Recommended locations for boxes to be installed on site Appendix C Hibernaculum design and suggested location 23 August 2017 2 Land adjacent to Church Farm Barn, Weston Longville Scheme of Biodiversity Improvement 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 20200937 Larks Rise, Weston Longville
    Application Assessment Notes Application No: 2020 0937 Site Inspection Date n/a App Name : Householder Site Address : Larks Rise, Field Road, Weston Longville, NR9 5JN Proposal : Conversion of existing garage to form two storey workspace/office Site notice n/a Site Notice Location n/a displayed ? Checked Is it a Listed Building or in a Yes The building is not listed or in a Conservation Area Conservation Area ? Do Plans show existing Yes The existing situation is shown with elevations of all situation accurately ? four perspectives as well as with photos, a ground floor plan and block plan Context of Design and Yes The existing outbuilding is single storey with a part Materials pitched and part flat roof. It is rendered in cream colour and has a green garage door. Effect on streetscene Yes Effect on streetscene is small as the outbuilding will acceptable ? be located a minimum of 21m from the highway Impact on neighbour ? eg Yes Impact on the neighbour at Hill Farm involves minor overlooking overshadowing Changes in level in or around Yes Minimal changes in levels site ? Boundaries – Trees on site or Yes No significant trees on site abutting ? Significant ecology impact Yes There will be no impact on ecology. likely ? Highways Any highway issues n/a applicable ? Parking / turning issues ? n/a Significant Site Features : n/a Issues To Check / further actions: n/a Pre commence conds ? n/a Details sent to applicant / agent Date Applicant / Agent confirmed acceptable Date Consultees WESTON LONGVILLEPARISH COUNCIL: No response. NEIGHBOURS: No response. Assessment This application has been considered against the Development Plan for the area, this being the Joint Core Strategy (JCS) for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk 2011 as amended 2014 and the Development Management DPD (2015).
    [Show full text]
  • UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland
    UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable Blofield Heath Blofield Nurseries, Hall GNLP0099 2.85 Up to 25 This site is considered to Road dwellings be unreasonable for allocation as it is located some way beyond the built edge of the village with no safe pedestrian route to Hemblington Primary School. Development of this site would not be well related to the form and character of the settlement. Land to the west of GNLP0288 1.43 24 dwellings This site is considered to Woodbastwick Road be unreasonable for allocation as the planning history suggests there are access constraints which means that the site would only be suitable for small scale development off a private drive. It therefore would not be able to accommodate the minimum allocation size of 12-15 dwellings. Land east of Park GNLP0300 0.78 Residential Although this site is Lane (unspecified adjacent to the existing number) settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. Dawson’s Lane GNLP2080 2.65 42 dwellings Although this site is adjacent to the existing settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. In addition, the proposed access to the site is Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable currently a narrow track with an unmade surface which would need upgrading to be acceptable.
    [Show full text]