Voter Guide for the Waterfront

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voter Guide for the Waterfront Voter Guide for the Waterfront Survey of Candidates for New York City Office September 2017 About Us The Waterfront Alliance is a coalition of more than 950 organizations working together to protect, transform, and revitalize our harbor and waterfront. This document was prepared by Waterfront Alliance with layout template provided by Decker Design. Image: Ian Douglas Voter Guide for the Waterfront Survey of Candidates for New York City Office September 2017 4 Introduction 7 Candidates for Citywide Office Mayor 7 Sal Albanese 8 Bill de Blasio 11 Nicole Malliotakis 12 Abbey-Laurel Smith Public Advocate 14 Letitia James Comptroller 15 Scott Stringer 16 Candidates for Borough President Brooklyn 16 Eric Adams Manhattan 19 Gale Brewer 20 Candidates for City Council 1 Margaret Chin 21 9 Pierre Gooding 39 31 Donovan Richards 51 Christopher Marte 22 Tyson-Lord Gray 40 32 Michael G. Scala 52 2 Ronnie Cho 23 10 Ydanis Rodriguez 41 Carlina Rivera 24 Mary Silver 25 35 Scott Hutchins 53 Jorge Vazquez 26 12 Karée-Lyn Gordon 42 37 Rafael L. Espinal, Jr. 54 4 Vanessa Aronson 27 13 Mark Gjonaj 43 Rachel Honig 28 Marjorie Velázquez 44 Jeffrey Mailman 29 38 Sara M. Gonzalez 55 Marti Speranza 30 Carlos Menchaca 56 Rebecca Harary 31 17 Patrick Delices 45 41 Henry Butler 57 18 William Russel Moore 46 5 Patrick Bobilin 33 Ben Kallos 34 43 Kevin Peter Carroll 58 Paul Vallone 47 Vincent Chirico 59 19 Khader El-Yateem 60 6 Helen Rosenthal 35 Liam McCabe 61 Mel Wymore 36 20 Peter Koo 48 John Quaglione 62 7 Mark Levine 37 22 Costa Constantinides 49 47 Mark Treyger 63 8 Robert J. Rodriguez 38 27 I. Daneek Miller 50 49 Debi Rose 65 INTRODUCTION New York is a city of water, with our waterways to act to protect our city for future generations. serving as a vital resource for commerce, It is incumbent upon our City’s next leaders transportation, education, and recreation. to invest their time and resources to make our Millions of people who inhabit our island waterways strong, healthy, and open for all. metropolis are rediscovering our maritime roots and celebrating our shared waters. In 2017, New Yorkers head to the polls to choose our leaders for the next four years. We Much progress has been made in recent years have again collected position statements from toward expanding use and access. These candidates for public office on five critical waters once teemed with ships, bringing policy questions affecting the waterfront. passengers and products from around the world. New York now claims the third largest We delivered a candidate brief, Blueprint for commercial port in the country. With NYC Our Blueways, outlining a five-point agenda Ferry bringing waterborne transit to new for New York’s waterways, to more than 200 neighborhoods across the city, the nation’s candidates That agenda, and corresponding largest fleet of urban ferries is still growing. candidate survey, called on those who seek public office to work toward a harbor that is: Thanks to progress spurred by the Clean Water Act, many of New York’s waterways • STRONG : Protected from the increasing are healthy enough for recreational use, threat of climate change, including with more people boating, fishing, and coastal flooding and sea level rise. swimming. Networks of stewardship groups • HEALTHY: Safe for recreational use, and concerned citizens have contributed meeting the Clean Water Act standards of to improving our urban habitat through “fishable and swimmable.” restoration initiatives and water testing. • OPEN: Equitable access for use and enjoyment across all communities, and But there is still a long way to go to ensure that welcoming to multiple types of vessels. the waterways continue to be an economic • WORKING : Productive gateway for Left to right: Paddling in Soundview, engine and environmental resource for all. international and regional commerce, Bronx with Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice; flooding in Bayswater, They are also a powerful reminder that we live providing good-paying jobs and Queens; decommissioned aircraft among nature, and share the benefits the environmental benefits. carrier Baylander at West Harlem Piers; riprap shoreline in Long Island waters provide and the risks they pose. The • MANAGED : Efficient oversight of diverse City, Queens. threat of sea level rise and more frequent and activities, integrating regulatory functions more powerful coastal storms require all of us with long-term planning and public use. 4 Voter Guide for the Waterfront 2017 INTRODUCTION (continued) Blueprint for Our Blueways Agenda OBJECTIVES RECOMMENDATIONS STRONG Protected from the • Adopt a regional, multi-city approach to coastal resilience increasing threat of climate • Commit to social equity when planning for resilience change, including coastal flooding and sea level rise • Commit to 80x50, significantly reducing our carbon footprint HEALTHY Safe for recreational use • Improve oversight of CSO remediation processes to reduce discharge and habitat restoration, • Prioritize green infrastructure (GI) for improved stormwater capture meeting the Clean Water Act standards of “fishable • Improve ambient water quality testing and swimmable” • Prioritize green infrastructure and incentives for stormwater capture OPEN Accessible for use and • Expand on-water opportunities citywide enjoyment across all • Improve regulatory clarity for on-water access communities, and welcoming to multiple types • Improve processes for maritime cultural operators of vessels • Expand capacity for ferry service and plan for expansion WORKING Productive gateway for • Preserve and protect existing maritime uses international and regional • Improve access to and awareness of maritime careers commerce, providing good-paying jobs and • Support maintenance dredging, our “hidden infrastructure” environmental benefits • Support future growth industries MANAGED Efficient oversight • Strengthen Waterfront Management Advisory Board (WMAB) of diverse activities, • Develop comprehensive financing plan for waterfront maintenance integrating regulatory functions with long-term • Review waterfront permitting process planning and public use 2017 Voter Guide for the Waterfront 5 INTRODUCTION (continued) QUESTIONS POSED TO THE CANDIDATES Candidates were asked to answer the following questions in an open-ended format, with the option to provide as much detail as possible Our Process and Methods STRONG The effects of climate change pose a serious risk to NYC, especially its coastlines. Building resilience to these threats is urgent and should be a For the second consecutive election cycle, we priority. Five Years removed from Hurricane Sandy slow, painful, and costly rebuilding continues as does the reminder of our city’s vulnerability to have asked all candidates running for public the impacts of climate change. More than 400,000 New Yorkers have a office in New York City in 2017 to put their 50% chance of a major flood in their homes by 2060, with almost half of those at risk facing economic and social vulnerability. There is no silver commitment to the future of our waterfront on bullet in preparing for the impact of climate change, but rather a variety the record. What do our next leaders have to of strategies that must be taken to ensure we are protecting our city, now and into the future. say about growing maritime jobs, expanding How do you plan to work to hold the city accountable access to our waterways, and restoring our to its climate change goals, including mitigation and harbor? adaptation, and ensure our region receives its fair share of funding from federal and state partners? We contacted all candidates for Mayor, Public HEALTHY A clean and healthy harbor is the best way to reconnect New York to our Advocate, Comptroller, Borough President, water. Over the past several years substantial progress has been made in improving the health of our water, but so much work remains. Tens of and City Council with five questions related billion gallons of raw sewage continue to flow into our water annually. With to the most pressing waterfront policy issues the absence of a federal ally in the EPA, New York needs to lead at a local and regional level the effort to clean our waterways. facing New York. Responses from more than What strategies will you pursue to help improve 50 candidates for citywide office, Borough water quality and the health of our waterways, President, and City Council have been including reducing sewage outfall and meeting green compiled on the pages that follow, forming infrastructure targets? our 2017 Voter Guide for the Waterfront. OPEN More and more New Yorkers are interested in getting not only to the water’s edge, but onto and into the water: from paddling and sailing, This guide is intended to help the public to fishing and oyster monitoring. Despite its 520 miles of coastline, New York City remains largely unwelcoming to active use by people better understand the candidates’ positions and vessels, limiting opportunities for communities to enjoy and utilize on issues related to the future of New York’s their waterways. Access to the water is unevenly distributed, with more than half of all of New York’s waterfront districts restricted from using waterfront and its capacity to support good the waterways. Counting recreational boat launches, historic boat jobs, equitable access, and resilience in the programming, ferry landings, tour and charter locations, and marinas, there’s just one place to board or launch a boat for every four miles of our face of a changing climate. city’s coastline. How will you work to improve equitable access to use All responses to the candidate survey are of the waterways, from education to recreation to transportation, and other public uses? reproduced in full, with the candidates listed in alphabetical order by last name and sorted WORKING The Port of New York and New Jersey is our region’s gateway to by party affiliation. Candidates not included international commerce, but port facilities and maritime support industries are underappreciated and tucked away from public view.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 543 Union Street #1E Brooklyn, NY 11215 718.541.4378 GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Friends, Partners and Members
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT 543 Union Street #1E Brooklyn, NY 11215 718.541.4378 GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Friends, Partners and Members, Since its inception, the Conservancy has advocated for an open space network that would support and protect the health of the Gowanus Canal while providing access to its shores and vibrant public parks and corridors for the people who live, work and play in the neighborhood. In 2015, that vision started to become a reality. Construction began on the Sponge Park, which will transform the end of 2nd Street into a canal-fronting park that captures and filters stormwater. Additionally, as plans for new development and Superfund-related infrastructure emerge on the north end of the canal, it is clear that better (and more) public space is a priority, particularly along the canal’s edge. As these projects unfold, we are working closely with diverse local partners like Fifth Avenue Committee, Gowanus Alliance, Arts Gowanus, Old Stone House and others to ensure that these emerging public spaces not only reflect the community’s interests, priorities and needs, but weave together into an interconnected Greenscape, maximizing the health, resiliency, vibrancy and beauty of our Gowanus neighborhood. Throughout the next year, we will continue to reach out to residents, businesses and partners to get your input on the priorities for the Greenscape, with an eye toward designing a community-based masterplan that reflects the unique qualities of Gowanus. To learn more about the Greenscape initiative and how you can help, please visit our website www. gowanuscanalconservancy.org. We not only welcome your input, we need it! Ben Jones Board Chair LETTER FROM THE CHAIR SMITH ST ATLANTIC AVE GOWANUS WATERSHED PROSPECT PARK We envision the evolution of an Open, Clean and Alive Gowanus Canal and Watershed with accessible, connective open space; clean water, soil and air; and vibrant ecological, business and cultural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • February 19, 2019 Agenda
    Design Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 19, 2019 The Committee Meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. Public Meeting 2:15 p.m. Election of Officers 2:30 p.m. Consent Items 26925: Conversion of Building 20 into a light-industrial building, Morris Avenue, Third Street, Dock Avenue, and Fourth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26926: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Flushing Community Library, 41-17 Main Street, Flushing, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 20, CB 7) DDC/QL 26927: Construction of three overlook areas and restoration of a wetland, Hylan Boulevard Bluebelt between Seaver Avenue and Stobe Avenue, New Creek watershed, Staten Island. (Final) (CC 50, CB 2) DDC/DEP/DOT 26928: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, louvers, and doors, Bellevue Men's Shelter, 400 East 30th Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary) (CC 4, CB 6) DDC/DHS 26929: Rehabilitation of the Bushwick Health Center, 335 Central Avenue, Brooklyn. (Final) (CC 37, CB 4) DDC/DOHMH 26930: Construction of a portion of the Brooklyn Waterfront Greenway (Hamilton Gowanus Connector), Hamilton Avenue and Smith Street to 3rd Avenue and 29th Street, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 38 & 39, CB 6 & 7) DDC/DOT 26931: Construction of a prototypical planted median, Atlantic Avenue from Logan Street to Rockaway Boulevard, Brooklyn and Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 30, 32, & 37, CB BK5 & Q9) DDC/DOT 26932: Construction of streetscape improvements, Coney Island Hospital, Ocean Parkway between Avenue Z and Belt Parkway, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 48, CB 13) DDC/DOT 26933: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Queens District 7 Garage, 120-15 31st Avenue, Flushing, Queens.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete June 26, 2013 the Wall Street Journal/NBC New York/Marist Poll
    Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: The Wall Street Journal/NBC New York/Marist Poll* Weiner Surpasses Quinn among NYC Dems… Lhota Tops GOP Field in Quest for NYC Mayoralty *** Complete Tables for Poll Appended *** For Immediate Release: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 Contact: Lee M. Miringoff Barbara L. Carvalho Mary E. Griffith Marist College, 845.575.5050 This Wall Street Journal/NBC New York/Marist Poll reports: A month after former Congressman Anthony Weiner announced his candidacy for New York City Mayor, Weiner has moved ahead of his competitors. He now edges New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn by five percentage points in the race for the Democratic nomination. Among registered Democrats in New York City, including those who are undecided yet leaning toward a candidate, if the Democratic primary were held today, here is how the contest would stand: • 25% Anthony Weiner • 20% Christine Quinn • 13% Bill Thompson • 10% Bill de Blasio • 8% John Liu • 2% Erick Salgado • 1% Sal Albanese • 1% Other • 18% Undecided “The Weiner candidacy has scrambled the contest,” says Dr. Lee M. Miringoff, Director of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion. “But, nearly one in five Democrats are *All references to the survey must be sourced as “The Wall Street Journal/NBC New York/Marist Poll” undecided, and almost two-thirds are not firmly committed to a candidate which makes for a lot of persuadable voters.” The two frontrunners have traded places. In May, shortly after Weiner announced his candidacy, 24% of Democrats in New York City supported Quinn while Weiner received the support of 19%.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Community Board Profiles
    2018 Community Board Profiles Members and Demographics Report Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams 1 Table of Contents Filling vacancies and ensuring inclusion 3 Community Board 1 5 Community Board 2 10 Community Board 3 14 Community Board 4 19 Community Board 5 23 Community Board 6 28 Community Board 7 32 Community Board 8 37 Community Board 9 41 Community Board 10 45 Community Board 11 49 Community Board 12 53 Community Board 13 57 Community Board 14 62 Community Board 15 66 Community Board 16 71 Community Board 17 75 Community Board 18 79 2 Filling vacancies and ensuring inclusion When the Office of the Brooklyn Borough President (the Office) has a vacancy on any one of Brooklyn’s 18 community boards, it is brought to the attention of the Brooklyn borough president. The appointed liaison of those boards reviews the applications of those who were not appointed during the general process and selects an individual based upon how often they attend the meetings, their community involvement, and their career background. Other selection criteria may include factors that would increase the diversity of representation on the board, including age, gender identity, geographic location, and race/ethnicity. If the council member has a vacancy on the board, it is brought to the attention of the Brooklyn borough president’s board liaison and/or community board office, and the Office reaches out to the council member's office to inform them that there is a vacancy. The council member will provide their recommendations to the Office to determine who would be the best candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Greenways and Parkways Objectives and Policies
    Parks, Greenways and Parkways Objectives and Policies Green Bay Smart Growth 2022 Parks, Greenways and Parkways System Plan Relationship to the Issues and the Concept Plan ... 20-1 List of Figures Summary of Issues..................................................... 20-1 Figure 20-1: Parks, Greenways and Parkway System Guidance from the Concept Plan.................................. 20-2 Plan........................................................................20-7 Plan Overview ......................................................... 20-3 Figure 20-2: Trail System Plan...................................... 20-19 Figure 20-3: Parkway Design Concepts ......................... 20-25 Summary of Objectives ............................................... 20-3 Objectives and Policies ........................................... 20-4 List of Tables Objective 1 – New Parks ............................................. 20-4 Table 20-1: Park and Open Space System.......................20-6 Objective 2 – Existing Parks ...................................... 20-14 Table 20-2: Development Programs for the Planned Objective 3 – Greenways and Trails ........................... 20-18 Parks..................................................................... 20-9 Objective 4 – Parkways............................................. 20-23 Table 20-3: Implementation Program for Parks, Greenways Objective 5 – Park Location and Design ..................... 20-24 and Parkways ....................................................... 20-39 Objective 6 – Ecology
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Council Environmental SCORECARD 2017
    New York City Council Environmental SCORECARD 2017 NEW YORK LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS nylcv.org/nycscorecard INTRODUCTION Each year, the New York League of Conservation Voters improve energy efficiency, and to better prepare the lays out a policy agenda for New York City, with goals city for severe weather. we expect the Mayor and NYC Council to accomplish over the course of the proceeding year. Our primary Last month, Corey Johnson was selected by his tool for holding council members accountable for colleagues as her successor. Over the years he has progress on these goals year after year is our annual been an effective advocate in the fight against climate New York City Council Environmental Scorecard. change and in protecting the health of our most vulnerable. In particular, we appreciate his efforts In consultation with over forty respected as the lead sponsor on legislation to require the environmental, public health, transportation, parks, Department of Mental Health and Hygiene to conduct and environmental justice organizations, we released an annual community air quality survey, an important a list of eleven bills that would be scored in early tool in identifying the sources of air pollution -- such December. A handful of our selections reward council as building emissions or truck traffic -- particularly members for positive votes on the most significant in environmental justice communities. Based on this environmental legislation of the previous year. record and after he earned a perfect 100 on our City The remainder of the scored bills require council Council Scorecard in each year of his first term, NYLCV members to take a public position on a number of our was proud to endorse him for re-election last year.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC0713 Crosstabs.Xlsx
    The New York Times/Siena College Poll July 9-15, 2013 1,010 New York City Registered Voters MOE +/- 3.1% 610 Registered Democrats, MOE +/- 4.0% - 125 Registered Republicans, MOE +/- 8.8% Q1. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Michael Bloomberg is handling his job as Mayor? NYC Borough Party Registration Gender Age Political ViewUnion Ethnicity Religion EducationChildren Income Ind/ Afr Amer Less than College $50K- Total Bronx Bklyn Mhtn Queens Rep Dem Other M F 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Lib Mod Conserv HH White /Black Latino Cath Jewish Prot Other college degree in HH <$50K $100K $100K+ Approve 48% 51% 47% 54% 45% 50% 47% 50% 49% 47% 45% 51% 43% 53% 52% 49% 44% 44% 50% 36% 48% 44% 46% 44% 57% 40% 56% 46% 44% 45% 57% Disapprove 42% 40% 41% 37% 43% 45% 43% 40% 42% 43% 42% 44% 47% 38% 40% 42% 47% 50% 41% 50% 45% 47% 47% 43% 36% 49% 36% 48% 47% 45% 39% Don't know/No opinion 10% 8% 12% 8% 12% 5% 10% 10% 10% 10% 13% 4% 10% 10% 8% 9% 9% 6% 9% 14% 7% 9% 7% 13% 7% 11% 8% 6% 10% 9% 4% Q2. Do you feel things in New York City are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? NYC Borough Party Registration Gender Age Political ViewUnion Ethnicity Religion EducationChildren Income Ind/ Afr Amer Less than College $50K- Total Bronx Bklyn Mhtn Queens Rep Dem Other M F 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Lib Mod Conserv HH White /Black Latino Cath Jewish Prot Other college degree in HH <$50K $100K $100K+ Right direction 51% 42% 50% 57% 56% 49% 51% 51% 53% 48% 48% 57% 48% 49% 62% 51% 40% 46% 57% 40% 46% 49% 52% 44% 59% 44% 58% 47% 42% 50% 63% Wrong track 41% 48% 40% 35% 40% 42% 42% 42% 39% 43% 45% 39% 42% 42% 34% 41% 53% 45% 36% 51% 50% 43% 43% 47% 35% 47% 35% 46% 51% 43% 32% Don't know/No opinion 8% 10% 10% 8% 4% 9% 7% 7% 7% 9% 7% 4% 10% 9% 4% 8% 8% 9% 7% 9% 4% 8% 5% 9% 6% 8% 6% 7% 7% 7% 5% [Q3-Q18 ROTATED] Q3.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEDULE for MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY of NEW YORK Saturday, February 01, 2014
    SCHEDULE FOR MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY OF NEW YORK Saturday, February 01, 2014 9:40 - 10:10 AM COMMUNICATIONS CALL Staff: Monica Klein 10:15 - 10:45 AM TOBOGGAN RUN Location: Drop off: In front of 575 7th avenue Attendees: (t)Commissioner Roger Goodell , (t)Senator Charles E. Schumer, First Lady, Dante de Blasio Press Staff: Wiley Norvell 11:00 - 11:30 AM SUPERBOWL BOULEVARD FIELD GOAL KICK Location: Superbowl Boulevard, Broadway bewtween 45th & 46th Streets Attendees: Dante de Blasio 1:50 - 3:00 PM SUPER BOWL XLVIII HANDOFF CEREMONY Location: Roman Numerals Stage Drop Off: 7th avenue b/w 42nd and 43rd street Attendees: (t) Governor Christie; (t) Governor Cuomo; Governor Brewer(Arizona); Woody Johnson, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee Co-Chair & NY Jets Owner; Jonathan Tisch, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee Co-Chair & NY Giants Owner ; Al Kelly, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee President and CEO (Emcee); Michael Bidwill, Arizona Cardinals Owner; David Rousseau, Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee; Jay Parry, Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee CEO Press Staff: Wiley Norvell, Marti Adams 3:00 - 3:30 PM DEPART BOWL XLVIII HANDOFF CEREMONY EN ROUTE RESIDENCE Drive Time: 30 mins Car : BdB, DdB, Follow: Javon SCHEDULE FOR MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY OF NEW YORK Sunday, February 02, 2014 7:00 - 7:45 AM STATEN ISLAND GROUNDHOG DAY CEREMONY Location: Staten Island Zoo 614 Broadway, Staten Island, NY Attendees: Audience: 700 people On Stage: Comptroller Scott Stringer (t); Council Member Vincent Gentile; Reginald Magwood, NYS Park Director, representing
    [Show full text]
  • Disabled Students Letter to Mayor
    THE LEGISLATURE STATE OF NEW YORK ALBANY January 14, 2021 Honorable Bill de Blasio Mayor of the City of New York City Hall, New York, NY 10007 Dear Mayor de Blasio: In these diffiCult times, we applaud you and the Chancellor for starting the hard work of developing a proaCtive plan to Close the “COVID aChievement gap” experienced by many students throughout the City. We reCognize that the details of this plan are still being determined. We write today to make several recommendations for you to consider as you work to address both the achievement gap in academic, social and physical skill areas and the regression of life among the approximately 200,000 students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Unlike other students, this population of Children may never catch up on what was lost during the days of remote learning. With regard to the effort to provide families the option of blended or remote instruction models, appropriate staffing has beCome a Challenge, partiCularly for students with IEPs. This has been detailed in the press and in testimony from parents and other stakeholders at the joint Committee hearing of the New York City Council on the reopening of sChools (10/23/20). Additionally, parent-led advocaCy Consulting group, SpeCial Support ServiCes reCently released a report that surveyed 1,100 parents whose Children require speCial education serviCes during the initial sChools reopening, OCtober 7-26. In this report, parents desCribed numerous ways in whiCh IEP serviCes were not provided or partially provided. The following issues were identified: 1. Large Classes and Less Staffing have caused Integrated Co-Teaching Service to be Delivered Poorly: 1 ● Large sizes are over the UFT ContraCtual limit: Highest reported Blended remote ICT had 80 students.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Facility Name State Size (Acres)
    Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Size State (acres) Facility Name Nabors Landfill, Class 4 and Areas 1-2, 1-3 AR 48 City of Oracle Page, Trowbridge Ranch Landfill Closure AZ 4 City of Tucson Los Reales Landfill, West Side Closure AZ 30 Navajo County, Lone Pine Landfill AZ 60 Pinal County, Page-Trowbridge Ranch Landfill AZ 3.2 Butte County, Neal Road Landfill CA 33 City of Auburn Landfill CA 20 City of Los Angeles Bishops Canyon Landfill CA 45 City of Modesto Carpenter Road Landfill, Partial Clean Closure CA 38 City of Riverside, Tequesquite Landfill CA 40 City of Sacramento Dellar Property Closure CA 28 County of Mercer Highway 59 Closure CA 88 Placer County Eastern Regional Landfill CA 3 Potrero Hills Landfill CA 150 Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, Lewis Road Landfill CA 15 Sonoma Central Landfill, LF-1 Closure CA 85 Stanislaus County, Fink Road Landfill CA 18 West Contra Costa CA 60 Bayside Landfill, Closure FL 30 DeSoto County Landfill, Zone 1 FL 3 Escambia County Beulah Road Landfill FL 100 Glades County Landfill, Final Closure FL 7 Gulf Coast Landfill, Phase III Closure FL 15 Hillsborough County Pleasant Grove Class I Landfill FL 11 Immokalee Landfill, Closure FL 24 Lake County Lady Lake Landfill FL 2 Medley Landfill, Phases 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5 Closures FL 84 Monarch Hill Landfill, Phases 1-7 Closures FL 110 Naples Landfill, Naples, Phase 2 Closure FL 11 Okeechobee Landfill, Phases 1-5 Closures FL 98 Polk County North Central Class III Landfill FL 11 Royal Oaks Ranch, Titusville, Final Closure FL 30 SCMM Landfill, Phase 1 Closure FL 23 Volusia County Plymouth Ave.
    [Show full text]