DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Is Beautiful, Big Is Subsidized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Is Beautiful, Big Is Subsidized SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL, BIG IS SUBSIDISED How our taxes contribute to social and environmental breakdown Steven Gorelick, Principal Author With an Introduction by Helena Norberg-Hodge ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Like many products of non-governmental organisations, this report is the result of a team effort. The core analysis was first presented in a series of lectures by ISEC’s Director, Helena Norberg-Hodge. Peter and Mimi Buckley suggested that we try to find ‘hard data’ to substantiate the arguments, and offered to fund the necessary research. We are extremely grateful to them for their support. Special thanks are also due to Andrew Blackwood, who helped substantially with research and wrote the first draft. Without him, the project would never have got off the ground. We would also like to acknowledge the help of Richard Douthwaite, who chased up some key facts and figures, and the contributions of Carola Buhse, Les Blomberg, Beth Burrows, David Edwards, Janey Francis, Suzanna Jones, David Korten, Todd Merrifield, Julian Oram, John Page, Andrew Rowell, Miyo Sakashita and Deborah Tull. Steven Gorelick is ISEC’s US Programmes Director. October 1998 Second printing July 2002 © ISEC – Please feel free to reproduce and distribute with appropriate credit. Design & layout by Fiona North, 3 Counties Design Ltd. Tel: (01305) 259280. Photograph page 46 by Tim McCabe/USDA. All other photographs by John Page. Printed by L. Brown & Sons, Barre, VT. SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL, BIG IS SUBSIDISED How our taxes contribute to social and environmental breakdown Principal Author StevenP Gorelick Contents INTRODUCTION by Helena Norberg-Hodge – Page 2. 1. It’s Evolution, Isn’t It? – Page 5. 2. The Big Get Bigger – Page 8. 3. Growth Made Easy: Infrastructure and Scale – Page 12. 4. Subsidising Long-Distance Transport – Page 15. 5. Communicating Globalism – Page 19. 6. Finding the Energy – Page 23. 7. Learning to Serve the Global Market – Page 27. 8. Research: Who Pays, Who Profits? – Page 32. 9. Expanding Infrastructures: The Race to Nowhere – Page 36. 10. The Rules of the Game, Free Trade – Page 40. 11. Lots of Regulations, Little Effect – Page 45. 12. So why Do They Keep Doing It? – Page 50. T HE I N T ERNA ti ONAL S OC I E T Y FOR E COLOGY & C UL T URE 1 S MALL is B EAU ti FUL , B I G is S U bsi D is ED INTRODUCTION by Helena Norberg-Hodge ith the demise of communism, it result is that all of our choices – from education, energy use, is generally assumed that the world transport and communications – are being shaped and distorted has only one option: an unregulat- to suit an ever more centralised, ever more globalised economy. ed global market dominated by Combined, these costly subsidies and investments make for an giant corporations. extremely inefficient system. Any appearance of efficiency is maintained only because our taxes cover many of the costs at Many people believe that deregulation frees large, transnational the expense of small, local producers who, left to their own Wcorporations to provide consumers with an unprecedented resources, are thereby made to seem comparatively inefficient. variety of produce from every corner of the globe. Thanks to Large TNCs also benefit from their ability to pressurise the global economy, we are able to fill our shopping baskets governments into passing regulations favouring large producers with apples from Kenya, cheap butter from New Zealand and often in the deliberate attempt to destroy smaller competitors. a whole range of exotic foods. If this produce is cheaper than An additional factor which paradoxically ends up favouring locally-produced alternatives, then that is because suppliers are large over small is the fact that large scale, intensive production operating on a larger, more efficient scale. Sophisticated PR is often inherently more polluting. and advertising campaigns persuade us that the bigger the com- Consider the case of factory farming. Where large numbers pany, the safer the food. of animals are made to live in close confinement, conditions are In addition to these consumer benefits at home, many peo- ripe for the outbreak of virulent disease. In this situation, more ple seem to think that the spread of Western-style economic controls and regulations are required than is the case for small- development will be accompanied by Western-style democracy er producers. The latter, however, are forced to comply with abroad. Globalisation has brought about cheap air travel and these same stringent – and, for them, unnecessary – safeguards, closer communication between diverse cultures, and it is hoped that this will herald the emergence of a peaceful ‘global village’ ‘As we have tried to show in this booklet, and eliminate warring strife between nations. however, the truth of the matter is that Similarly, because environmental crises – from climate change to species depletion – clearly transcend national bound- ‘efficiencies of scale’ are a myth: big is not aries, globalisation is also seen as a necessary step towards inter- necessarily ‘cheaper’ or more ‘efficient’.’ national collaboration to solve global problems. Beyond these supposed beneficial effects, the global econo- at a cost that few can afford to bear. my is declared inevitable – it will continue to grow whether we Government support for transport and high-tech commu- like it or not. It’s the consequence of an insatiable consumer nications make it possible for multinational corporations to culture. It’s what giant corporations want, or, more to the point, destroy smaller local competitors. A local shop in a village in it’s what no one has the power to stop. In the final analysis, glo- England that buys most of its goods locally, does not need sat- balisation is often portrayed as a kind of economic ‘manifest ellites, mainframe computers, large-scale transport infrastruc- destiny’ dictated by ‘economic laws’ beyond the reach of human tures, container ships, heavily subsidied airplane fuel, and so on. intervention. These laws are said to naturally favour large pro- In contrast, a large hypermarket could not exist without them. ducers over small, centralised global production over dispersed From the point of view of the consumer, it can look as local production. Big, it turns out, is cheap; big is efficient, big though goods from the other side of the world are cheaper, is better! As we have tried to show in this booklet, however, the when all of these subsidies are invisible. But we need to start truth of the matter is that ‘efficiencies of scale’ are a myth: big is looking, not only at the money in our pockets, but how our not necessarily ‘cheaper’ or more ‘efficient’. taxes are used against us. More and more people are left little If we allow ourselves to look beyond the assumptions and choice but to eat processed, long shelf-life food from far away, narrow confines of this conventional wisdom, it becomes clear because it is cheaper. The tilted playing field means that they that giant corporations are the product of government support cannot afford fresh local food. through a range of both direct and indirect subsidies. At the heart of the modern industrial economy is the prin- ciple of ‘comparative advantage’ according to which it is always in a nation’s interest to specialise production for export rather TILtiNG THE PLAYING FIELD than promote diversified production for local and national For generations now our tax money has been used to create an needs. As a consequence, economic policies encouraging trade economic framework that favours the big over the small. The have supported trading institutions which have merged to 2 T HE I N T ERNA ti ONAL S OC I E T Y FOR E COLOGY & C UL T URE I N T RODUC ti ON become the giant transnational corporations that we know As people pour into the city in search of jobs, only a tiny today. By now, each of the major commodities on the world fraction are successful – usually in a sweat shop, mass-producing market – e.g.: coffee, cocoa, cotton – is controlled by a handful consumer goods for an unstable Western market. The Times of of corporations. India (26.8.98) describes the process well: This support for international trade has given global players “Women and children are emerging as the new ‘human an unfair advantage over local producers and businesses. The cash crop’ in South Asia as rapid globalisation drives more and result is a tilted playing field favouring monopolies which are more villagers to distant cities to make good. But most of them growing larger and more powerful every day. In recent years, end up providing cheap labour or get caught in the sex trade.“ their power has been boosted dramatically by a series of ‘free- In addition to the human suffering, the shift of production trade treaties’, such as NAFTA, Maastricht, GATT, and the from North to South has heralded a massive increase in local Multilateral Agreement on Investment (or MAI). Known as the air pollution, toxic waste and other environmental hazards, in “Multinationals’ Charter”, the MAI will elevate the rights of cities like New Delhi, Bangkok and Mexico City. companies above those of nations and their citizens. This will Whatever the superficial attractions of a global economy give companies the power to sue governments if domestic leg- dominated by giant corporations, the price is high: a deterio- islation interferes with trade. These agreements are not about rating environment, increasing poverty, greater insecurity and trade between countries but about the rights of transnational greater inequality. World-wide, globalisation also leads to a loss corporations to move unimpeded into every domestic market. of both economic and political control. This disempowerment Negotiated in secret, wrapped in highly complex and tech- inevitably leads to frustration and anger and an increase in eth- nical language, these treaties are rarely read, much less under- nic conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World
    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Conti-Brown*
    CONTI-BROWN 64 STAN. L. REV. 409 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2012 3:58 PM ELECTIVE SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY Peter Conti-Brown* Government bailouts are expensive, unjust, and unpopular, and they usually represent dramatic deviations from the rule of law. They are also, in some cases, necessary. The problem that bailouts pose, then, is that they are almost always inimical to the interests of society, except when they are not. This complexity is ignored under the recent Dodd-Frank Act, which improbably guarantees an end to taxpayer bailouts. Indeed, much of the Act makes bailouts more likely, not less, by making the wrong kind of bailouts available far too often. This Article proposes to solve the problem of bailouts by retaining governmental ability to make the right kinds of bailouts possible through forcing the bailed-out firms to internalize the bailout costs. The proposal—called “elective shareholder liability”—allows bank shareholders two options. They must either change their bank’s capital structure to include dramatically less debt, consistent with the consensus recommendation of leading economists; or alternatively, they must add a bailout exception to their bank’s limited- shareholder-liability status, thus requiring shareholders—not taxpayers—to cover the ultimate costs of the bank’s failure. This liability would be structured as a governmental collection, similar to a tax assessment, for the recoupment of all bailout costs against the shareholders on a pro rata basis. It would also include an up-front stay on collections to ensure that there are, in fact, taxpayer losses to be recouped and to mitigate government incentives for overbailout, political manipulation, and crisis exacerbation.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks in a Roundtable Discussion on Hurricane Fran in Raleigh, North
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1996 / Sept. 14 1751 the world, and all the American people de- the tobacco, the corn, perhaps some others, serve better than that. and I'd like to hear about that. We just want Thanks for listening. to know what the full dimensions of the prob- lems are and what we can do to help, and NOTE: The address was recorded at 9:25 p.m. on we'll do our best. September 13 in the Map Room for broadcast at 10:06 a.m. on September 14. [At this point, the roundtable discussion began.] Remarks in a Roundtable Discussion The President. First of all, I would like on Hurricane Fran in Raleigh, North toÐlet me begin by thanking all of you who Carolina have spoken and those who worked in public September 14, 1996 capacities and the citizens who told their sto- ries. Thank you in Wilmington, Mr. Mayor, The President. Thank you, Governor. I and the others for joining us by satellite. The don't want to say too much right now. We wonders of modern technology have given mostly just came down to listen and to see us a picture of that house, which proves that what we could do to help. But I would like no matter how modern technology gets, we to say, first of all, that like most Americans, are not in total control, and I thank you all I've followed the course of the hurricane and for what you have done. the storms and the rains. I have followed very What I'd like to do in the time we have closely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Work of Future The
    Communications and Society Program Bollier THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments THE FUTURE OF WORK By David Bollier Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, MD 21658 11-003 THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments By David Bollier Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-543-9 11/004 Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone .............................................................vii THE FUTURE OF WORK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS, David Bollier Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White House Staffs: a Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 30 Years!
    LA CONSERVATION CORPS Celebrating 30 Years! 2016 { WELCOME} Dear Friends, We are so excited to welcome you to our very special 30th Anniversary Celebration and Annual Spring Luncheon! A special occasion like this deserves a special venue and what better place Banc of California than the beautiful Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. A major theme for us this year is telling the Corps story – the individuals, the projects, the relationships, congratulates the the lessons learned, the walls that have been knocked down – that comes Los Angeles Conservation together in one beautiful epic journey from the past to the future. We hope Corps on 30 years of you will enjoy hearing a few of those stories today. transforming youth and We can think of no better way to mark this tremendous milestone enhancing communities. for the Corps than by honoring the men who made it possible – Mickey Kantor and John Van de Kamp. Many of you know the story of how Mickey brought the Corps to life. Not only did he set the stage, but INVESTING IN CALIFORNIA for three decades he has been bringing together the best players, We are reaching out to proven leaders keeping the curtains raised, and leading the cheering section. And, there and local causes with a commitment to has been no better advocate, advisor, and mentor for everyone at the building stronger communities through Corps – staff, Corpsmembers, and fellow Board Members – than John Van a ordable housing and homeownership, de Kamp. Gentlemen, we cannot thank you enough for your commitment fi nancing small businesses, and fi nancial and your service.
    [Show full text]
  • Pew Research Center for the People & the Press January
    PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS JANUARY 9-12, 2009 NEWS INTEREST INDEX OMNIBUS SURVEY TOPLINE N=1,004 Q.1 Can you tell me the name of the person you’ve heard the most about in the news lately? [PROBE IF NECESSARY: Just the name that comes to mind FIRST when you think about who’s been in the news lately] [IF ANSWER GIVEN ASK: Who else comes to mind?] [OPEN END. RECORD UP TO TWO MENTIONS. RECORD FIRST MENTION ON FIRST SCREEN AND SECOND MENTION ON SECOND SCREEN] NOTE: Total exceeds 100% because of multiple responses. Dec 5-8, 2008 72 Barack Obama 89 21 Rod Blagojevich 17 George W. Bush 12 9 Bernard Madoff 6 John Travolta 5 Sarah Palin 8 3 Roland Burris 3 Hillary Clinton 19 2 Caylee Anthony 1 Caroline Kennedy 1 Leon Panetta 1 Arnold Schwarzenegger 1 Bill Richardson 1 1 Joe Biden 1 Oprah Winfrey 1 1 Pac Man Jones 1 Patrick Swayze 1 Michelle Obama 13 Other answer given 10 Don’t know/No answer Q.2 As I read a list of some stories covered by news organizations this past week, please tell me if you happened to follow each news story very closely, fairly closely, not too closely, or not at all closely. First, [INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE ITEMS] [IF NECESSARY “Did you follow [ITEM] very closely, fairly closely, not too closely or not at all closely?”] Very Fairly Not too Not at all DK/ Closely Closely Closely Closely Refused a. Conflict between the Israeli military and Hamas forces in Gaza 34 35 18 13 0=100 January 2-4, 2009 28 32 22 18 *=100 TREND FOR COMPARISON:1 March 7-10, 2008 20 33 26 21 *=100 August, 2006 40 34 14 10 2=100 1 In
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Leading International Trade Lawyers
    Leading Ten of the D.C. Area’s Top LAWYERS International Trade Lawyers Identifying10 Leading International Trade Lawyers By Jenna Greene ome are knights in shining armor for belea- International Trade guered domestic industries. Others are the A Practice Focus Schampions of free markets, knocking down barriers at home and abroad. As the volume of goods and services being traded worldwide has expanded, so, too, have the duties of the international trade lawyers. istockphoto/Mariusz Niedzwiedzki These 10 leading lawyers have to be a versatile bunch. Problems may be solved by raising U.S. countervailing duty claims, or by negotiating com- plex international agreements, or by pushing gov- ernment officials to bring cases before the World Trade Organization. Experts in everything from ura- economic sanctions, and national security reviews. nium to chocolate to lumber, they may be sought out Still, all seem to retain a certain wonder for the by industry leaders to level the playing field or to far-flung locales and exotic goods that often go gain a home-court advantage. And in the post-9/11 along with an international trade practice. As one world, they are also called upon to help companies leading lawyer put it, “The world is an endlessly navigate the growing thicket of export controls, fascinating place.” WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2007 • VOL. XXX, NO. 38 © 2007 ALM Properties Inc. All rights reserved. This article is reprinted with permission from Legal Times (1-800-933-4317 [email protected] • www.legaltimes.com). Leading Ten of the D.C. Area’s Top LAWYERS International Trade Lawyers WTO disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Krasny Has Interviewed a Wide Range of Major Political and Cultural Figures Including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright
    Michael Krasny has interviewed a wide range of major political and cultural figures including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright, Sherman Alexei, Robert Altman, Maya Angelou, Margaret Atwood, Ken Auletta, Paul Auster, Richard Avedon, Joan Baez, Alec Baldwin, Dave Barry, Harry Belafonte, Annette Bening, Wendell Berry, Claire Bloom, Andy Borowitz, T.S. Boyle, Ray Bradbury, Ben Bradlee, Bill Bradley, Stephen Breyer, Tom Brokaw, David Brooks, Patrick Buchanan, William F. Buckley Jr, Jimmy Carter, James Carville, Michael Chabon, Noam Chomsky, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Cesar Chavez, Bill Cosby, Sandra Cisneros, Billy Collins, Pat Conroy, Francis Ford Coppola, Jacques Cousteau, Michael Crichton, Francis Crick, Mario Cuomo, Tony Curtis, Marc Danner, Ted Danson, Don DeLillo, Gerard Depardieu, Junot Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joan Didion, Maureen Dowd. Jennifer Egan, Daniel Ellsberg, Rahm Emanuel, Nora Ephron, Susan Faludi, Diane Feinstein, Jane Fonda, Barney Frank, Jonathan Franzen, Lady Antonia Fraser, Thomas Friedman, Carlos Fuentes, John Kenneth Galbraith, Andy Garcia, Jerry Garcia, Robert Gates, Newt Gingrich, Allen Ginsberg, Malcolm Gladwell, Danny Glover, Jane Goodall, Stephen Greenblatt, Matt Groening, Sammy Hagar, Woody Harrelson, Robert Hass, Werner Herzog, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Hornby, Khaled Hosseini, Patricia Ireland, Kazuo Ishiguro, Molly Ivins, Jesse Jackson, PD James, Bill T. Jones, James Earl Jones, Ashley Judd, Pauline Kael, John Kerry, Tracy Kidder, Barbara Kingsolver, Alonzo King, Galway Kinnell, Ertha Kitt, Paul Krugman, Ray
    [Show full text]
  • Administration Officials' Biographies
    THE PRESIDENT ’S MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Administration Officials Senior Executive Service (SES) Session Scott Gould, Deputy Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs Seth Harris, Deputy Secretary, Department of Labor Christine Kluh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs David Lebryk, Commissioner of the Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury Katie Malague, Performance Manager, White House Office of Management and Budget Catherine Murphy, Regional Solicitor, Department of Labor Stephen Shih, Deputy Associate Director for Executive Resources and Employee Development, Office of Personnel Management Denise Wells, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of Health and Human Services W. SCOTT GOULD, DEPUTY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS W. Scott Gould was nominated by President Obama to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and subsequently confirmed by the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on April 2, 2009. As Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Gould serves as the chief operating officer of the federal government's second largest department, responsible for a nationwide system of health care services, benefits programs and national cemeteries for America’s veterans and their dependents. Prior to his appointment to the VA, Gould was Vice President for public sector strategy at IBM Global Business Services where he focused on strategy and innovation. Previously, he was Chief Executive Officer of The O’Gara Company, a strategic advisory and investment services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Exolve, a technology services company. The former Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Administration at the Department of Commerce, Gould has also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Finance and Management at the Treasury Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Listing
    SPEAKER LISTING 2020-21 2010-11 Harrison Hickman ’75 | Peniel Joseph Majora Carter | David Brooks | President Bill Clinton John Avlon & Margaret Hoover (w/Mark Updegrove) Jeannette Walls | Jean-Michel Cousteau Ian Bremmer | Sally Field (w/Pat Mitchell) Paul Nicklen | Theresa May | Colson Whitehead 2009-10 Garry Trudeau | Yo-Yo Ma | Paul Krugman 2019-20 Anna Deavere Smith | David Gregory Laura Bush | Stephen Breyer Doris Kearns Goodwin (w/Mark Updegrove) 2008-09 Khaled Hosseini | Christiane Amanpour & James Rubin 2018-19 Sir Salman Rushdie | Anthony Bourdain @ DPAC Karl Rove & David Axelrod | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Anna Quindlen Julia Gillard | Dr. Paul Farmer | Diana Nyad 2007-08 2017-18 Kathleen Turner, Louis Gossett Jr. & Jane Seymour Joe & Jill Biden | Lisa Genova | Leslie Odom Jr. Isabel Allende | J.C. Watts | Bob Woodward Reza Aslan | Ted Koppel | Brandon Stanton 2006-07 2016-17 Mary Robinson | David McCullough | Toni Morrison Michael Pollan | Mark & Scott Kelly | Amal Clooney Neil deGrasse Tyson | Bryan Stevenson | Alan Alda 2005-06 Karen Armstrong | Desmond Tutu | Bill Moyers 2015-16 *Garrison Keillor (2 shows) Robin Wright | Atul Gawande | Jon Meacham 2004 - 05 George Takei | Malcolm Gladwell Cokie Roberts | Mikhail Gorbachev | Mary Pipher 2014-15 Michael Beschloss Ron Howard (w/Leonard Maltin) | Bill Bryson 2003-04 Margaret Atwood (w/ Roger Rosenblatt) Dr. Sherwin Nuland | Edward Albee | Ken Burns Robert Reich | Anderson Cooper Sidney Poitier | George J. Mitchell 2013-14 2002-03 Robert Gates | Robert Ballard | Itzhak Perlman Ernest Gaines | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Elizabeth Alexander | Steve Kroft and Lesley Stahl 2001-02 2012-13 Madeleine Albright | Oscar Arias and Ralph Nader Tina Brown | Tom Brokaw | Geoffrey Canada Bill Bradley, Jeb Bush and Gwen Ifill 2000-01 Thomas Friedman Doris Kearns Goodwin | Jack Miles | Bill Bradley Neil deGrasse Tyson 2011-12 Tony Blair | Twyla Tharp | Sanjay Gupta 1999 *David McCullough @ Reynolds Auditorium Colin Powell Ken Burns | Fareed Zakaria 1996 Thomas Friedman.
    [Show full text]
  • 9929555.PDF (7.296Mb)
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WARRING FACTIONS: SENATORS, NOMINEES, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By LAUREN MICHELLE COHEN Norman, Oklahoma 1999 ÜMI Number: 9929555 UMI Microform 9929555 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company.
    [Show full text]