An Examination of Speech Characteristics Under Conditions Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Examination of Speech Characteristics Under Conditions Of Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 An examination of speech characteristics under conditions of affective reactivity and variable cognitive load as distinguishing feigned and genuine schizophrenia Gina M. Najolia Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Najolia, Gina M., "An examination of speech characteristics under conditions of affective reactivity and variable cognitive load as distinguishing feigned and genuine schizophrenia" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1551. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1551 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AN EXAMINATION OF SPEECH CHARACTERISTICS UNDER CONDITIONS OF AFFECTIVE REACTIVITY AND VARIABLE COGNITIVE LOAD AS DISTINGUISHING FEIGNED AND GENUINE SCHIZOPHRENIA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Psychology by Gina M. Najolia B.A., New York University, 1999 J.D., Harvard Law School, 2002 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2010 December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1 Schizophrenia .............................................................................................................1 Malingering of Schizophrenia....................................................................................3 Current methods of assessment of malingering of schizophrenia .................4 Currently utilized assessment tools ....................................................8 Examining Behaviorally-Based Speech Characteristics Under Controlled Conditions of Variable Affective and Cognitive Load to Identify Feigning of Schizophrenia .............................................................................................................10 Communication Disturbances Index ..............................................................12 Communication disturbances under conditions of variable affective load ......................................................................................14 Communication disturbances under conditions of variable cognitive load .....................................................................................16 Flat affect and alogia as measured using the CANS procedure .....................22 Flat affect and alogia under conditions of variable affective load .....................................................................................................22 Flat affect and alogia under conditions of variable cognitive load .....................................................................................................23 Study Design ..............................................................................................................23 Hypotheses .................................................................................................................25 METHODS .........................................................................................................................29 Participants .................................................................................................................29 Schizophrenia group ......................................................................................29 Honest control group......................................................................................30 Feigning group ...............................................................................................30 Speech Tasks ..............................................................................................................32 Cognitive load speech task.............................................................................32 Medium-load cognitive task ..............................................................33 High-load cognitive task ....................................................................33 Affective reactivity speech task .....................................................................34 Post-test Assessment ..................................................................................................34 Dependent Variables ..................................................................................................35 Speech variables.............................................................................................35 CDI .....................................................................................................35 CANS .................................................................................................36 Cognitive task performance ...........................................................................39 Analyses .....................................................................................................................39 Data distribution.............................................................................................39 Demographic variables ..................................................................................39 Primary analyses ............................................................................................40 Feigning group post-task questionnaire .........................................................40 ii Power Analysis ..........................................................................................................41 RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................43 Data Distribution ........................................................................................................43 Demographic Variables .............................................................................................43 Primary Analyses .......................................................................................................48 Affective reactivity speech task .....................................................................48 CDI .....................................................................................................49 Alogia .................................................................................................51 Blunt Affect .......................................................................................55 Formant variables...............................................................................58 Cognitive load speech task.............................................................................62 CDI .....................................................................................................62 Alogia .................................................................................................65 Blunt Affect .......................................................................................71 Formant variables...............................................................................75 Cognitive task performance ...............................................................79 Feigning group post-task questionnaire .........................................................81 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................85 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................102 APPENDIX A SCHIZOPHRENIA SUMMARY EXCERPTED FROM THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH (2009) .......................109 APPENDIX B NEUTRAL SPEECH TASK INSTRUCTIONS ..........................111 APPENDIX C INSTRUCTIONS FOR AFFECTIVE LOAD SPEECH TASK ...................................................................................................................................112 APPENDIX D POST-TASK QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE FEIGNING GROUP ................................................................................................................................113 APPENDIX E COPY OF THE LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD’S PROJECT APPROVAL FORM ............... 114 THE VITA ........................................................................................................ 123 iii ABSTRACT Proper assessment of schizophrenia is complicated by the need for clinicians to be cognizant of the possibility of malingering, i.e., the intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated symptoms, motivated by external incentives. Current standardized schizophrenia malingering detection methods rely on endorsement of improbable or exaggerated, mainly positive, symptoms. However, these detection methods may be vulnerable to successful manipulation by sophisticated malingerers, particularly if coached regarding response style assessment strategies. This paper explored the utility of supplementalvariables to examine in schizophrenia malingering
Recommended publications
  • Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia
    Reward Processing Mechanisms of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Gregory P. Strauss, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Psychology University of Georgia Disclosures ACKNOWLEDGMENTS & DISCLOSURES ▪ Receive royalties and consultation fees from ProPhase LLC in connection with commercial use of the BNSS and other professional activities; these fees are donated to the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation. ▪ Last 12 Months: Speaking/consultation with Minerva, Lundbeck, Acadia What are negative symptoms and why are they important? Domains of psychopathology in schizophrenia Negative Symptoms ▪ Negative symptoms - reductions in goal-directed activity, social behavior, pleasure, and the outward expression of emotion or speech Cognitive Positive ▪ Long considered a core feature of psychotic disorders1,2 Deficits Symptoms ▪ Distinct from other domains of psychopathology (e.g., psychosis, disorganization) 3 ▪ Associated with a range of poor clinical outcomes (e.g., Disorganized Affective disease liability, quality of life, subjective well-being, Symptoms Symptoms recovery) 4-7 1. Bleuler E. [Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias]. Vertex Sep-Oct 2010;21(93):394-400. 2. Kraepelin E. Dementia praecox and paraphrenia (R. M. Barclay, Trans.). New York, NY: Krieger. 1919. 3. Peralta V, Cuesta MJ. How many and which are the psychopathological dimensions in schizophrenia? Issues influencing their ascertainment. Schizophrenia research Apr 30 2001;49(3):269-285. 4. Fervaha G, Remington G. Validation of an abbreviated quality of life scale for schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Sep 2013;23(9):1072-1077. 5. Piskulic D, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, et al. Negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis. Psychiatry research Apr 30 2012;196(2-3):220-224.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropsychiatric Masquerades: Is It a Horse Or a Zebra NCPA Annual Conference Winston-Salem, NC October 3, 2015
    Neuropsychiatric Masquerades: Is it a Horse or a Zebra NCPA Annual Conference Winston-Salem, NC October 3, 2015 Manish A. Fozdar, M.D. Triangle Forensic Neuropsychiatry, PLLC, Raleigh, NC www.BrainInjuryExpert.com Consulting Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine Disclosures • Neither I nor any member of my immediate family has a financial relationship or interest with any proprietary entity producing health care goods or services related to the content of this CME activity. • I am a non-conformist and a cynic of current medical establishment. • I am a polar opposite of being PC. No offense intended if one taken by you. Anatomy of the talk • Common types of diagnostic errors • Few case examples • Discussion of selected neuropsychiatric masquerades When you hear the hoof beats, think horses, not zebras • Most mental symptoms are caused by traditional psychiatric syndromes. • Majority of patients with medical and neurological problems will not develop psychiatric symptoms. Case • 20 y/o AA female with h/o Bipolar disorder and several psych hospitalizations. • Admitted a local psych hospital due to decompensation.. • While at psych hospital, she develops increasing confusion and ataxia. • Transferred to general med-surg hospital. • Stayed for 2 weeks. • Here is what happened…. • Psych C-L service consulted. We did the consult and followed her throughout the hospital stay. • Initial work up showed Normal MRI, but was of poor quality. EEG was normal. • She remained on the hospitalist service. 8 different hospitalists took care of her during her stay here. • Her presentation was chalked off to “her psych disorder”, “Neuroleptic Malignant syndrome” etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Disorders: Strategies for Approach & Treatment
    3/20/2019 Mental Health Disorders: Strategies for Approach & Treatment Transform 2019: OPTA Annual Conference Columbus, Ohio April 6th, 2019 Dawn Bookshar, PT, DPT, GCS Ian Kilbride, PT Marcia Zeiger, OTRL Objectives Participants will: • Understand the prevalence and impact of mental health disorders in client populations • Understand clinical conditions, and associated characteristics of common mental health diagnoses • Apply effective treatment approaches for clients with mental illness. • Produce effective clinical documentation to support intervention for clients with mental illness Mental Illness (MI) www.schizophrenia.com 1 3/20/2019 Mental Illness (MI) The term mental illness refers collectively to all diagnosable mental disorders defined as sustained abnormal alterations in thinking, mood, or behavior associated with distress and impaired functioning which substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities. National Institute of Mental Health Prevalence of MI • More than 50% will be diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder at some point in their lifetime. • 1 in 5 Americans will experience a mental illness in a given year. • 1 in 25 Americans lives with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Prevalence of MI in LTC • 2/3 of people in nursing homes have a mental illness. • Nursing home residents with a primary diagnosis of mental illness range from 18.7% among those aged 65-74 years to 23.5% among those aged 85+ years. • Dementia, Alzheimer disease, and mood disorders are the most common diagnoses of mental illness in long-term care settings. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention 2 3/20/2019 Prevalence of MI in LTC Ohio • Residents with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder increased from 9% to 16% between 2001 to 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1
    The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1 Psychotic Disorders Slide 2 As with all the disorders, it is preferable to pick Archetype one “archetypal” disorder for the category of • Schizophrenia disorder, understand it well, and then know the others as they compare. For the psychotic disorders, the diagnosis we will concentrate on will be Schizophrenia. Slide 3 A good way to organize discussions of Phenomenology phenomenology is by using the same structure • The mental status exam as the mental status examination. – Appearance –Mood – Thought – Cognition – Judgment and Insight Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders. Slide 4 Motor disturbances include disorders of Appearance mobility, activity and volition. Catatonic – Motor disturbances • Catatonia stupor is a state in which patients are •Stereotypy • Mannerisms immobile, mute, yet conscious. They exhibit – Behavioral problems •Hygiene waxy flexibility, or assumption of bizarre • Social functioning – “Soft signs” postures as most dramatic example. Catatonic excitement is uncontrolled and aimless motor activity. It is important to differentiate from substance-induced movement disorders, such as extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. Slide 5 Disorders of behavior may involve Appearance deterioration of social functioning-- social • Behavioral Problems • Social functioning withdrawal, self neglect, neglect of • Other – Ex. Neuro soft signs environment (deterioration of housing, etc.), or socially inappropriate behaviors (talking to themselves in
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Mental Status Examination with the Help of Videos
    Understanding the Mental Status Examination with the help of videos Dr. Anvesh Roy Psychiatry Resident, University of Toronto Introduction • The mental status examination describes the sum total of the examiner’s observations and impressions of the psychiatric patient at the time of the interview. • Whereas the patient's history remains stable, the patient's mental status can change from day to day or hour to hour. • Even when a patient is mute, is incoherent, or refuses to answer questions, the clinician can obtain a wealth of information through careful observation. Outline for the Mental Status Examination • Appearance • Overt behavior • Attitude • Speech • Mood and affect • Thinking – a. Form – b. Content • Perceptions • Sensorium – a. Alertness – b. Orientation (person, place, time) – c. Concentration – d. Memory (immediate, recent, long term) – e. Calculations – f. Fund of knowledge – g. Abstract reasoning • Insight • Judgment Appearance • Examples of items in the appearance category include body type, posture, poise, clothes, grooming, hair, and nails. • Common terms used to describe appearance are healthy, sickly, ill at ease, looks older/younger than stated age, disheveled, childlike, and bizarre. • Signs of anxiety are noted: moist hands, perspiring forehead, tense posture and wide eyes. Appearance Example (from Psychosis video) • The pt. is a 23 y.o male who appears his age. There is poor grooming and personal hygiene evidenced by foul body odor and long unkempt hair. The pt. is wearing a worn T-Shirt with an odd symbol looking like a shield. This appears to be related to his delusions that he needs ‘antivirus’ protection from people who can access his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Agitation, Delirium, and Psychosis Curriculum for Psychologists/Social Workers
    FACILITATOR MANUAL ENGLISH-HAITI Introduction to Agitation, Delirium, and Psychosis Curriculum for Psychologists/Social Workers Introduction to Agitation, Delirium, and Psychosis Curriculum for Psychologists/Social Workers Partners In Health (PIH) is an independent, non-profit organization founded over twenty years ago in Haiti with a mission to provide the very best medical care in places that had none, to accompany patients through their care and treatment, and to address the root causes of their illness. Today, PIH works in fourteen countries with a comprehensive approach to breaking the cycle of poverty and disease — through direct health-care delivery as well as community-based interventions in agriculture and nutrition, housing, clean water, and income generation. PIH’s work begins with caring for and treating patients, but it extends far beyond to the transformation of communities, health systems, and global health policy. PIH has built and sustained this integrated approach in the midst of tragedies like the devastating earthquake in Haiti. Through collaboration with leading medical and academic institutions like Harvard Medical School and the Brigham & Women’s Hospital, PIH works to disseminate this model to others. Through advocacy efforts aimed at global health funders and policymakers, PIH seeks to raise the standard for what is possible in the delivery of health care in the poorest corners of the world. PIH works in Haiti, Russia, Peru, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Liberia Lesotho, Malawi, Kazakhstan, Mexico and the United States. For more information about PIH, please visit www.pih.org. Many PIH and Zanmi Lasante staff members and external partners contributed to the development of this training.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulsd730704 Td Luis Madeira.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA BASIC-SELF DISORDERS BEYOND SCHIZOPHRENIA: ULTRA-HIGH-RISK STATES AND PANIC DISORDER Luis António Proença Duarte Madeira Orientadores: Prof. Doutora Maria Luísa Caruana Canessa Figueira da Cruz Filipe Prof. Doutor Louis Arnorsson Sass Tese especialmente elaborada para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Medicina Especialidade em Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental 2017 A impressão desta dissertação foi aprovada pelo Conselho Científico da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa em reunião de 23/11/2016 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA BASIC-SELF DISORDERS BEYOND SCHIZOPHRENIA: ULTRA-HIGH-RISK STATES AND PANIC DISORDER Luis António Proença Duarte Madeira Orientadores: Prof. Doutora Maria Luísa Caruana Canessa Figueira da Cruz Filipe Prof. Doutor Louis Arnorsson Sass Tese especialmente elaborada para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Medicina Especialidade em Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental Juri: Presidente: Prof. Doutor José Luis Bliebernicht Ducla Soares, Prof. Catedrático em regime de tenure e Vice-Presidente do Conselho Científico da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Vogais: Prof. Doutor Carlos Manuel Moreira Mota Cardoso, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto Prof. Doutor João Eduardo Marques Teixeira, Professor Associado da Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto Prof. Doutor Manuel Gonçalves Pereira, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Prof. Doutor Daniel José Branco de Sampaio, Professor Catedrático Jubilado da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Prof. Doutora Maria Luísa Caruana Canessa Figueira da Cruz Filipe, Professora Catedrática Jubilada da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa (orientador) Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Schizophrenia- What You Need to Know
    SCHIZOPHRENIA- WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BY CATHY CYWINSKI, MSW LCSW SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA • Hallucinations- false perception • Delusions –fixed false belief • Grossly Disorganized Speech and Behavior • Tend to dress and act in odd ways • Flat Affect SYMPTOMS • Hallucinations-can occur with any of the five senses: • Auditory hallucinations • Visual hallucinations • Tactile hallucinations • Olfactory hallucinations • Gustatory hallucinations SYMPTOMS • Bizarre delusion – this simply translated means a delusion regarding something that CANNOT possibly happen. • Nonbizarre delusion – this is a delusion regarding something that CAN possibly happen. COMMON TYPES OF DELUSIONS • Grandiose • Erotomanic • Religious • Delusions of Control • Persecutory • Referential SYMPTOMS • Disorganized Speech • Loose associations- may go from one topic to another with no clear logic • Tangentiality- answers to questions may be obliquely related or completely unrelated • Incoherence or word salad- speech may be so severely disorganized that it is nearly incomprehensible SYMPTOMS • Grossly disorganized behavior • A person may appear disheveled, may dress in an unusual manner (many layers of clothes on a hot day), or may display inappropriate sexual behavior. • Alogia-poverty of speech- brief, empty replies • Avolition- inability to initiate and persist in goal directed activates. The person may sit for long periods of time and show little interest in participating in work or social activities. • Catatonic motor behaviors- a marked decrease in reactivity to the environments. SYMPTOMS • Negative Symptoms • Affect flattening- a person’s face appearing immobile and unresponsive, with poor eye contact and reduced body language IS THERE SOMETHING TO FEAR • Myth: People with a severe mental illness are violent and unpredictable. • Fact: The vast majority of people with mental health problems are no more likely to be violent than anyone else.
    [Show full text]
  • The Differential Diagnosis of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness And
    Case Reports The Differential Diagnosis of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Cognitive Deficits in a Patient with Delirium, Schizophrenia and Possible Narcolepsy: A Case Report David R. Spiegel 1, Parker W. Babington 1, Ariane M. Abcarian 1, Christian De Filippo 1 Abstract Narcolepsy and schizophrenia are disorders which share common features of negative symptoms, excessive daytime sleepiness and cognitive deficits. Presented here is a case report of a fifty-nine year old man with a past medical history of schizophrenia who was evaluated for suspected symptoms of delirium. After an electroencephalogram was per- formed with surprising results, the patient’s differential diagnosis included schizophrenia with comorbid narcolepsy. We present emerging evidence that excessive daytime sleepiness and attentional deficits in both narcolepsy and schizo- phrenia may share a common pathophysiological pathway through orexin deficiency and its effects on the dopamine system. Finally, we discuss the potential for modafinil as a treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness and attentional problems in schizophrenia and narcolepsy. Key Words: Cognition, Schizophrenia, Sedation, Sleep, Dopamine Introduction The hallmarks of delirium as described by the Diagnostic including the positive symptoms of delusions, hallucina- and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, tions, disorganized speech and grossly disorganized or cata- Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) are a disturbance of conscious- tonic behavior, and negative symptoms such as flattened af- ness with reduced ability to focus, sustain or shift attention. fect, alogia and avolition (1). Patients with schizophrenia Also present is a change in cognition, such as memory defi- also have cognitive deficits, including poor attention span. cit, disorientation or language impairment, or a perceptual Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep onset disorders such disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVIGATE Screening Assessment Tool
    NAVIGATE Screening Assessment Tool I. Inclusion criteria: 1. Resides in catchment area (or reasonable driving distance from) the mental health center. 2. Age 15 to 40. 3. Has IQ of 70 or above. 4. Person has experienced symptoms that demonstrate psychosis and which are highly likely to be the signs of an existing or emerging schizophrenia spectrum disorder, including A-E, below. 5. Symptoms of psychosis emerged less than 2 years ago. 6. Other causes of psychosis have been ruled out (Roman numeral II). 7. Meets criteria of less than 1 year of lifetime treatment with anti-psychotics. A. Delusions _Behaviors, speech or beliefs that are delusional in nature _Episodes of depersonalization (e.g. they believe that they do not exist or that their surroundings are not real) _ High levels of fear, anxiety, or paranoid for no apparent reason or for an unfounded reason _ Feelings that other people are putting thoughts in their head, stealing their thoughts, believes others can read their mind (or vice versa) and/or hears their own thoughts out loud B. Hallucinations _ Experiences hearing voices or sounds that others do not hear _ Experiences visual hallucinations or distortions _ Experiences hallucinations related to smell, touch or taste C. Thought Disorder/Disorganized Speech _ Thought disorganization as evidenced by disorganized speech and/or writing D. Grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior _ Experiences (or significant others report) disorganized behavior or catatonic behavior E. Negative symptoms _ Flat affect _ Difficulty experiencing pleasure _ Difficulty feeling motivated to engage in activities that he or she used to do _ Significant decline in either academic, vocational, social or personal (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4, and 2) the “Form” of Thought
    Pridmore S. Download of Psychiatry, Chapter 6. Last modified: February, 2020. 1 CHAPTER 6 FORM OF THOUGHT Introduction In the psychiatric examination, two aspects of thought are considered: 1) “content” - abnormal the content of thought (delusions) is described in Chapter 4, and 2) the “form” of thought. Form means the “arrangement of parts”. When the “arrangement of the parts” of thought are out of order, the logical connections between the ideas are lost – the thought is difficult to follow. Disorder in the form of thought (or formal thought disorder – FTD) is frequently, for the sake of brevity, referred to as ‘thought disorder’. Theoretically, ‘thought disorder’ could refer to disordered content (delusions), but in practice it is generally used to refer to FTD. [For the sake of convenience, “flight of ideas” and “poverty of thought”, which strictly speaking are not disorders of connection, but disorders of speed or amount of thought, will also be described in the paragraphs of this chapter.] FTD is diagnostically significant, and detection is important. While many health and social services workers can give a good account of some aspects of the mental state of a patient, the assessment of FTD requires special training and experience. The general public may comment that the patient’s speech is “odd”, he/she is ‘difficult to follow’, or ‘gets off the track’. The form of thought is mainly assessed by examining the speech of the patient. It is necessary to take the conventions of conversation into account when examining ‘form’. In everyday conversation we tend to ignore changes of subject and direction; we pay more attention to content and ‘the bottom line’.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Symptoms- an Update
    Galore International Journal of Health Sciences and Research Vol.4; Issue: 1; Jan.-March 2019 Website: www.gijhsr.com Review Article P-ISSN: 2456-9321 Negative Symptoms- an Update Dr Pavithra P. Rao1, Dr Preethi Rebello2, Dr P. John Mathai3 1Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry. Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 2Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 3Professor. Department of Psychiatry, Jubilee Mission Medical College, East Fort Thrissur. Kerala. India. Corresponding Author: Dr P. John Mathai ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Negative symptoms (NS) are Negative Symptoms in psychiatry are deficits in abnormal absence of normal behaviour and experience and behavior that are attributed to experience, attributed to the loss of normal loss of functions of brain. Negative symptoms functions of the brain. The NS are defined have been conceptualized as the core aspect of as absence of experience/behaviour that schizophrenia and have been recognized as [1] important ever since the days of Griesinger, should have been present. They are Kraepelin and Bleuler. But over the years the general descriptive terms used for the significance of the negative symptoms was various clinical manifestations of the deleted and emphasis was placed almost diminished capacity for ordinary exclusively on positive symptoms. The return of behavioural functioning (behavioural negative symptoms in schizophrenia was deficits). [2] Though there are differences in inevitable. The five general categories of the language used to refer to NS such as, negative symptoms include avolition, deficits symptoms, defect state symptoms, anhedonia, affective blunting, alogia and type II symptoms, core symptoms, asociality. The subdomains of negative fundamental symptoms, primary symptoms symptoms are experience domain (avolition and and basic symptoms, there are definite anhedonia) and expressivity domain (affective [3-7] blunting and alogia).
    [Show full text]