The Origins of Aerospace Engineering Degree Courses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Origins of Aerospace Engineering Degree Courses Contributed paper Introduction Theorigins of the aerospaceindustry go back The origins of manycenturies. Everyone is familiar with the aerospace engineering storyof Icaruswho having designed a pairof wings,attempted to ¯y.Hewas successfulbut degree courses ¯ewtooclose to the sun,whereupon the adhesiveused as wingfastening melted due to E.C.P. Ransom and thermalradiation and his ¯ ightended in A.W. Self disaster.At the timethis wouldhave been regardedas science® ction,but clearly there was someawareness of aerodynamics(for wingdesign), adhesives and thermal radiation. The authors Inretrospect, it isapparent that before E.C.P. Ransom and A.W. Self are at Kingston University, successfulman carrying powered ¯ ightcould London, UK bedemonstrated, there had been a periodof intensestudy including experimental and Keywords theoreticalanalysis. The Royal Aeronautical Society,formed in 1866, precededthe ®rst Higher education, Aerospace engineering ¯ightby some37 years.As alearnedsociety it encouragedthe discoveryand exchange of Abstract knowledgenecessary for successful heavier The development of degree courses specically designed than air¯ ight. for aerospace engineers is described in relation to the Orvilleand Wilbur Wright, contrary to change in needs of the industry since the demonstration of popularunderstanding, were extremely powered ight. The impact of two world wars and political talentedresearch workers as wellas decisions on the way universities have been able to meet competentdesigners. T oimprovetheir the demand for graduates is discussed. The effect of these understandingof wingaerodynamics they changes is examined in relation to the type of education builta windtunnel, a replicaof whichis in the received by current graduates compared with early ShuttleworthCollection at OldW arden,they courses. studiedbird ¯ ightintensively in orderto developa successfulaerodynamic control Electronic access system,using wing warping, and they The current issue and full text archive of this journal is designedand built a reciprocatingengine available at whichhad a powerto weightratio of 12 lb/HP http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0002-2667.htm (7.3 Kg/Kw). Thiswas superiorto anything thenavailable. Ina letterwritten 2 years beforetheir ® rstdemonstration of ¯ight Wilburwrote ª . Itispossible to ¯ywithout motors,but not without knowledgeand skillº (Marvinand McFarland, 1953). It isclearthat learningis anessential and integralconstituent of asuccessfulaerospace industry.Knowledgehad been sought for centuriesprior to the ®rstsuccessful ¯ ightand the thirst forknowledge seems today to be unquenchable. Thispaper ® rstconsiders the historyand developmentof the industry,including its changingneeds. It isfollowed by the developmentof aerospaceeducation, AircraftEngineering andAerospace T echnology includingthe philosophyand course content Volume 74 ·Number4 ·2002 ·pp.355 –364 q MCB UPLimited ·ISSN 0002-2667 of universitycourses. Finally, the impactof DOI 10.1108/00022660210434433 thesechanges is discussed. 355 Theorigins of aerospace engineering degree courses Aircraft Engineeringand Aerospace Technology E.C.P.Ransomand A.W. Self Volume74 ·Number4 ·2002· 355–364 TheUK industry with somesuspicion. By the endof the war in 1918, aviation hademerged as asigni®cant Therepor tof the ®rstsuccessful ¯ ightwas an militaryforce.The formation in the United inspirationfor many to attempt to emulatethe Kingdomof the RoyalAir Force (RAF) was a Wrightbrothers. In Europe, particularly in sealof recognitionof this fact andled to Franceand England, new designsevolved and detailedconsideration of the roleof aviation in by 1910 manysuccesses had been registered, warfare, andits effect uponaircraft design. forexample the ®rstcrossing of the English Verylittle thoughthad been given to the Channel.The commercial possibilities were developmentof civilaviation andthe beginningto emergeand in the UKthe ®rst Europeanslagged behind advances in the aircraft manufacturingcompanies were set up. USA. Amongthe earliestwere Airco, later to Inorder to illustrateemployment trends, becomede Havilland,British and Colonial, the numberof programmesundertaken by later to becomethe BristolAeroplane oneaircraft organisation(Sopwith, Hawker, Companyand Vickers. Before 1920 Sopwith, Hawker Siddeley,and British Aerospace, later Hawkers,Armstrong Whitworth, Avro, Kingston)over the period1912 to 1988 has Blackburn,Supermarine and English Electric beenconsidered (Fozard, 1987). Atthe hadall commencedproduction. These birthof the industry,two orthree projects companiesand others were to mergeseverally mightbe started in one year andthere would in1960 to formtwo airframecompanies, beperhaps one or two otherprojects in Hawker SiddeleyAviation and the British progress.Political factors had a crucial AircraftCorporation (Stamper, 1984). In in¯uence in the formof WW1, butas is 1978 thesetwo companiestogether with shown,politics have always hada signi®cant ScottishAviation merged to createBritish if notdominant in¯ uence on the development Aerospace,which in turnmerged with the ofthe UKindustry.Atthe endof hostilities, GeneralElectric Company to formBritish productionof militaryaircraft ceasedand AerospaceSystems plc in 1998. Whilstthis employmentprospects declined. By 1925 was takingplace international links were being demandhad started to recoverand new establishedwhich led to the developmentof a designswere being produced. By the early numberof aircraft includingConcorde, thirtiesat any onetime there might be up to Jaguarand T ornado.Airbus Industries was ®ve orperhapssix projects in progress but createdby the comingtogether of aircraft newaircraft designswere started much less companiesin several countries principally frequently.Bythe endof the thirties,the France,Germany and the UnitedKingdom. increasinginternational tension which OtherU Kaircraft companieswhich precededWW2 ledto increaseddemand for remainedoutside the BritishAerospace militaryaircraft. Followingthe endof WW2 Systemsorganisation included Short andthe adventof the ªcoldwarº military Brothers,which moved to NorthernIreland projectscontinued but at areducedrate. The after WW2. In1960 Westlands,which started noticeablefactor isthat duringthis periodand to specialisein helicopter design and upto the present,the numberof projects manufactureafter WW2, absorbedthe startedreduced but the projectlength helicopterdivisions of Saunders± Roe,the increased.T oillustratethis trendFigures 1, 2 BristolAeroplane Company and Fairey and3, developedfrom Fozard, 1987, show Aviation.More recently W estlandhelicopters that the averagelength of projectclimbs have mergedwith Augusta,an Italian steadilyfrom two yearsin 1912 to almost30 helicoptermanufacturer to forma large yearsby 1988. TheHarrier, in one form or Europeanorganisation. Handley Page which another,from conception to the endof declineda requestto merge,ceased operation manufacture,is expected to have alifeof in1962. Thereason for these changes are around40 yearsif the early prototypesand beyondthe scopeof this paper,but the effect demonstratorsi.e. the P1127 andKestrel are uponthe changingemployment and skill included.At anationallevel the numberof needsof organisationshas hada signi®cant UKgovernmentfunded projects decreased in¯uence on the provisionof educational dramaticallyover the period1946 ±1984. courses. [Figure4], (Stamper,1984). Atthe commencementof hostilitiesin Asaconsequenceof the increasing 1914, the Britishmilitary regardedaviation complexityof aircraft, the numbersemployed 356 Theorigins of aerospaceengineering degree courses Aircraft Engineeringand Aerospace Technology E.C.P.Ransomand A.W. Self Volume74 ·Number4 ·2002· 355–364 Figure 1 AverageProject Length -1912–1939 Figure 2 AverageProject Length 1940–1960 Figure 3 AverageProject Length -1961–1988 indesign of® cesincreased, and as the dependingupon the defencepolicy at the time knowledgebase widened the numberof andthe levelof internationaltension. technicaldepartments grew (Fozard, 1987) Morerecently, the trendhas beenfor Figure5. Employmentprospects ¯ uctuated projectsto becomeinternational. The cost of militaryand civil aircraft isnowso great it is Figure 4 Number ofUK Funded Programmes (Fozard, 1987) Figure 5 TechnicalDepartments at Hawker Aircraft/ BAe, Kingston (Fozard,1987) 357 Theorigins of aerospace engineering degree courses Aircraft Engineeringand Aerospace Technology E.C.P.Ransomand A.W. Self Volume74 ·Number4 ·2002· 355–364 beyondthe ®nancialcapacity ofacompany con®ned to Mechanical,Civil andElectrical basedsolely in one country .Thusin Europe Engineering.Aeronautical subjects in withinthe last twenty years,aircraft undergraduatecourses were not introduced manufacturershave soughtpartnerships, for untilthe early 1920’s.East LondonCollege example,Airbus, or mergers, for example pioneeredthe developmentswhere a Diploma Westlands± Augusta. was awarded.In 1922 the Universityof Asthe industryexpanded, specialist Londonintroduced aeronautical subjects componentcompanies evolved. The earliest withintheir BSc(Eng) programme. exampleof this isof courseRolls-Royce PLC. The® rstChair in Aeronautical Engineering Manyother organisations are major suppliers was establishedat Cambridge,and optional to the aircraft industryof componentssuch as papersin aeronautical subjects were landinggear, aircraft ®ttings, introducedinto undergraduate courses in instrumentation,combustion equipment (for 1921. ImperialCollege appointed its ®rst gasturbines) and perhaps most signi® cantly professorin Aeronautical Engineering in 1920 avionicequipment.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Aerospace Engineering Major
    Major Map: Aerospace Engineering Bachelor of Science in Engineering (B.S.E.) College of Engineering and Computing Department of Mechanical Engineering Bulletin Year: 2020-2021 This course plan is a recommended sequence for this major. Courses designated as critical (!) may have a deadline for completion and/or affect time to graduation. Please see the Program Notes section for details regarding “critical courses” for this particular Program of Study. Credit Min. Major ! Course Subject and Title Hours Grade1 GPA2 Code Prerequisites Notes Semester One (17 Credit Hours) ENGL 101 Critical Reading and Composition 3 C CC-CMW ! MATH 141 Calculus 13 4 C CC-ARP C or better in MATH 112/115/116 or Math placement test score CHEM 111 & CHEM 111L – General Chemistry I 4 C CC-SCI C or better in MATH 111/115/122/141 or higher math or Math placement test AESP 101 Intro. to Aerospace Engineering 3 * PR Carolina Core AIU4 3 CC-AIU Semester Two (18 Credit Hours) ENGL 102 Rhetoric and Composition 3 CC-CMW C or better in ENGL 101 CC-INF ! MATH 142 Calculus II 4 C CC-ARP C or better in MATH 141 CHEM 112 & CHEM 112L – General Chemistry II 4 PR C or better in CHEM 111, MATH 111/115/122/141 or higher math ! PHYS 211 & PHYS 211L – Essentials of Physics I 4 C CC-SCI C or better in MATH 141 EMCH 111 Intro. to Computer-Aided Design 3 * PR Semester Three (15 Credit Hours) ! EMCH 200 Statics 3 C * PR C or better in MATH 141 ! EMCH 201 Intro.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Book for Our Buffet Lunch on 15Thmay - See Page 7
    CHILTERN AIRCREW ASSOCIATION APRIL 2019 NEWSLETTER Book for our Buffet Lunch on 15thMay - see Page 7 March Meeting 1930 and demonstrated the aircraft several times at the air pageants at Hendon. Chris Skivyer gave us a fas- Cordes became Chief Test Pilot at Handley Page in 1933, cinating presentation about he developed the Harrow (First flight 1933) and the the goings on at the bottom Hampden (First flight 1936). The pinnacle of his career of his garden (which bor- must be the development of the Halifax, which he flew its dered onto Radlett Aero- First flight in 1939. The Halifax along with the Lancaster drome). became the mainstay of Bomber Command from 1942 until the end of the war. He retired from active test flying The aerodrome was opened in 1945. in 1929 but the official opening by HRH The Duke Post war it was to be the Victor Bomber that took the of Kent was on 7 Jul 30. name of Handley Page to the forefront of British aviation. Discussed at some length, much to the delight of Ian The first Test Pilot was Major Cordes who had earlier Stewart! Later as other companies joined together Sir used the area for a precautionary landing en route to Frederick Handley Page refused and despite a venture London. It was Cordes who suggested Handley Page into the civil market with the HP Herald, initially as a 4 should develop Radlett. He was attached to the Royal engine machine, changing latterly to 2 x Rolls Royce Flying Corps in 1916 and undertook his flying course in Darts it never fulfilled it’s full potential, missing out to the Egypt where he flew Maurice Farman Shorthorns.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Types Used in Law Enforcement
    Aircraft Types used in Law Enforcement ACT Lancair Philippines, Airships [all types] R series [R33 etc.] United Kingdom, Skyship France, Japan, United Kingdom, United States, Virgin/ABC Lightships Belgium, France, United Kingdom, Aeritalia AMC-3/AL60 South Africa, Aero 24 Hungary, 45 [K-75] Czechoslovakia, Hungary, AP-32 Czechoslovakia, C-104 Czechoslovakia, Aeronca 7AC United States, Aero Baero 180RVR Argentina Aero Commander [see Rockwell] Commander/Shrike Commander Australia, Bahamas, Colombia, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Panama, United States, Airspeed Ferry United Kingdom, Agusta A109 Australia, Austria, Belgium, Ghana, Italy, Japan, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela, AB139 Oman, Albatross CIII Germany, DIII Germany, Antonov An-2 Estonia, Latvia, Mongolia, Nicaragua, Poland, Russia An-24 Mongolia, An-26 Nicaragua, An-32 Mexico, Peru, Russia An-72 Russia Arado 68 Germany 96 [Avia C-2B] Czechoslovakia, Armstrong-Whitworth AW660 Argosy C1 United Kingdom, ATR ATR42 Italy, Auster Auster Falkland Islands, Hong Kong, Kenya, Malaysia [RAF], Netherlands, United Kingdom, Avia International Police Aviation Research - law enforcement aircraft types 2 B-534 Czechoslovakia, S-89 [Supermarine Spitfire] Czechoslovakia, S-97 [Lavockin La-7] Czechoslovakia, S-99/S-199 [Bf109] Czechoslovakia, C-2B [Arado 96B] Czechoslovakia, K-65 [Fiesler Fi-156C] Czechoslovakia, K-75 [Aero 45] Czechoslovakia, VR-1 [Fa-223] Czechoslovakia, Avro Anson Australia 748 Sri Lanka, United Kingdom, Ayres S-2
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Engineering Essentials (In Aerospace)
    Systems Engineering Essentials (in Aerospace) March 2, 1998 Matt Sexstone Aerospace Engineer NASA Langley Research Center currently a graduate student at the University of Virginia NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team Executive Summary • “Boeing wants Systems Engineers . .” • Systems Engineering (SE) is not new and integrates all of the issues in engineering • SE involves a life-cycle balanced perspective to engineering design and problem solving • An SE approach is especially useful when there is no single “correct” answer • ALL successful project team leaders and management employ SE concepts NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team Overview • My background • Review: definition of a system • Systems Engineering – What is it? – What isn’t it? – Why implement it? • Ten essentials in Systems Engineering • Boeing wants Systems Engineers. WHY? • Summary and Conclusions NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team My Background • BS Aerospace Engineering, Virginia Tech, 1990 • ME Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Virginia, 1997 • NASA B737 High-Lift Flight Experiment • NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team – Conceptual Design and Mission Analysis – Technology and Systems Analysis • I am not the “Swami” of Systems Engineering NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team Review: Definition of System • “A set of elements so interconnected as to aid in driving toward a defined goal.” (Gibson) • Generalized elements: – Environment – Sub-systems with related functions or processes – Inputs and outputs • Large-scale systems – Typically include a policy component (“beyond Pareto”) – Are high order (large number of sub-systems) – Usually complex and possibly unique NASA Intercenter Systems Analysis Team Systems Engineering is . • An interdisciplinary collaborative approach to derive, evolve, and verify a life-cycle balanced system solution that satisfies customer expectations and meets public acceptability (IEEE-STD-1220, 1994) • the absence of stupidity • i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC AVIATION CATALOG AV-14 Spark
    ® CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC AVIATION CATALOG AV-14 REVISED AUGUST 2014 Spark Plugs Oil Filters Slick by Champion Exciters Leads Igniters ® Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Spark Plugs ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Product Features ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Spark Plug Type Designation System ............................................................................................................. 2 Spark Plug Types and Specifications ............................................................................................................. 3 Spark Plug by Popular Aircraft and Engines ................................................................................................ 4-12 Spark Plug Application by Engine Manufacturer .........................................................................................13-16 Other U. S. Aircraft and Piston Engines ....................................................................................................17-18 U. S. Helicopter and Piston Engines ........................................................................................................18-19 International Aircraft Using U. S. Piston Engines ........................................................................................ 19-22 Slick by Champion .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Authenticity, Interdisciplinarity, and Mentoring for STEM Learning Environments
    International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology Volume 4, Number 1, 2016 DOI:10.18404/ijemst.78411 Lessons Learned: Authenticity, Interdisciplinarity, and Mentoring for STEM Learning Environments Mehmet C. Ayar, Bugrahan Yalvac Article Info Abstract Article History In this paper, we discuss the individuals’ roles, responsibilities, and routine activities, along with their goals and intentions in two different contexts—a Received: school science context and a university research context—using sociological 11 July 2015 lenses. We highlight the distinct characteristics of both contexts to suggest new design strategies for STEM learning environments in school science context. We Accepted: collected our research data through participant observations, field notes, group 11 October 2015 conversations, and interviews. Our findings indicate that school science practices were limited to memorizing and replicating science content knowledge through Keywords lectures and laboratory activities. Simple-structured science activities were a STEM education means to engage school science students in practical work and relate the STEM learning theoretical concepts to such work. Their routine activities were to succeed in Learning environment schooling objectives. In university research settings, the routine activities had School science interdisciplinary dimensions representing cognitive, social, and material Science communities dimensions of scientific practice. Such routine activities were missing in the practices of school science. We found that the differences between school and university research settings were primarily associated with individuals’ goals and intentions, which resulted in different social structures. In school settings, more authentic social structure can evolve if teachers trust their students and allow them to share the social and epistemic authorities through establishing mentorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace/Software Engineer
    Aerospace Engineer or Software Engineer Summer Internship Requisition Number: 18-I-01 Job Title: Aerospace/Software Engineering Intern Career Level: Internship Location: Littleton, Colorado Relocation: No Education Required: High School GED or Diploma; Pursuing Bachelor’s Degree in Related Field Years of Experience: 0-1 years Travel: None Job Description: Oakman Aerospace, Inc. (OAI) seeks several summer interns to complete project(s) in the spaceflight industry with backgrounds in aerospace engineering, embedded systems software development, mathematics and GUI development. Successful candidates will be responsible for working under the guidance of a full-time OAI employee to complete a summer project in the aerospace industry. Candidates will have working knowledge of aerospace and/or software systems and seek to apply their skills to solve challenging problems and present the culmination of their work to executive management. Basic Qualifications: • High School GED or Diploma • Pursuing Bachelor’s Degree degree in computer science, computer engineering, electrical engineering, aerospace or related field • Strong mathematical foundation • Strong analytical and problem solving skills • Excellent interpersonal and communication skills, both written and oral. • Self-motivated and performing tasks with minimal oversight • Experience in a multi-discipline environment • Proficient in Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, Word • Excellent verbal and written communication skills; the ability to professionally communicate and coordinate with a wide range of external program sponsors as well as internal management and administrative personnel • Sound fiscal and time management skills, attention to detail, and priority management to meet conflicting deadlines Required Skills & At least one of the following: Knowledge: • Experience working in an aerospace environment • Experience supporting flight hardware and/or software development and testing • Experience programming with C/C++ in an embedded real-time environment • Experience with software and system automation (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 1931 De Havilland DH82A Tiger Moth
    .4.. .. - ...'"'.... ,.;,.~,,""~~......... ..,-~".-, de Havilland D.H.82A The Tiger Moth was the culmi­ GB de Havilland D.H.82A Tiger Moth -1931 Tiger Moth nation of a series of light aircraft designs begun in 1924 with the D.H.5!' The original idea was to The Tiger Moth is probably the most develop a touring plane that was famous training plane in the history of extremely simple and, more import­ aviation. A total of7,300Tiger Moths ant, very economical. But the D.H.51 were built, and the plane saw fifteen was not a great success. It was the years of continuous service with the D.H.60 Moth that was to catch on in R.A.F. In the years preceding the 1925. The D.H.60 is rightly considered Second World War this small biplane the legitimate founder of the line of was used by most of the civilian flying biplanes that was ultima(ely to pro­ schools in Great Britain, and it was the duce the Tiger Moth. Almost five standard trainer during the early years hundred and fifty D.H.60s were built of the war for military flying in in a version that was equipped with a England, Canada, Australia, and New Renault engine; and more than six Zealand. Tens of thousands of pilots hundred were built in model G, which around the world learned to fly in this was powered by a new engine, the flight on October 26, 1931, and large­ Aircraft: de Havilland D.H. 82ATiger Moth Manufacturer: The de Havilland Aircraft famous aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • De Havilland Support Limited Scottish Aviation Bulldog
    DE HAVILLAND SUPPORT LIMITED DUXFORD AIRFIELD, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB2 4QR, ENGLAND CAA APPROVAL TELEPHONE Ref. AD/1819/00 +44 (0) 1223 830090 Groups E1 & E2 FAX +44 (0) 1223 830085 WEBSITE E-MAIL www.dhsupport.com [email protected] SCOTTISH AVIATION BULLDOG AIRCRAFT SERVICE LETTER SERVICE LETTER No. BDG/1/2004, ISSUE 2 STRUCTURAL LIFE AND FATIGUE DATA RECORDING 1. AIRCRAFT AFFECTED All models of Scottish Aviation Bulldog 2. REASON FOR ISSUE The Bulldog Full-Scale Fatigue Test has demonstrated that the critical (life-limiting) fatigue feature of the aircraft type is the wing-to-fuselage (stub wing) main spar joint. Depending upon whether an individual aircraft is, or has been, fitted with a fatigue meter, so the cleared safe life of this critical joint may be expressed in terms of either Fatigue Index or flying hours. Whilst there are several references to this subject within Service Bulletins and other Bulldog technical publications, there remains some doubt amongst owners regarding the meaning of Fatigue Index and its relationship to flying hours. The aim of this Service Letter is to draw together the relevant facts from the various references on the subject, to explain the concept of Fatigue Index (FI), and to advise owners of Bulldogs fitted with fatigue meters of the current requirements for fatigue data collection and calculation. The letter also gives planning advice regarding other life-limiting features of the Bulldog and an overview of work in progress regarding a modification for retrospective installation of fatigue meters. 3. FATIGUE DATA 3.1 General Every metal aircraft suffers fatigue damage caused by the reversals and fluctuations of load applied to the airframe during all phases of operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Engineering
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING WWW.BIRMINGHAM.AC.UK/AEROSPACE OUR PROGRAMMES UCAS CODE Single Honours BEng Aerospace Engineering H400 MEng Aerospace Engineering H402 Accredited by In 2018, civil aviation was responsible for transporting 4.4 billion travellers worldwide. The number of passengers is expected to grow at a rate of 3–5% every year, doubling by 2035. Although downturns happen due to global events such as pandemics, civil aviation typically recovers quickly after such events. Space transport is also becoming increasingly important: ever-more companies are specialising in cheaper sub-orbital and orbital flights, both for leisure and to deliver state-of-the-art satellites. This growing industry will require skilled graduates who will be centre stage in solving important technological challenges. WHY STUDY AEROSPACE ENGINEERING WITH US? ACADEMIC PROFILE n Exciting new programme, building on our experience across many aspects of Professor Alison aerospace engineering, including materials, Davenport OBE spacecraft design, propulsion and battery Head of school technology n Research-led teaching, with many lecturers 'Aerospace is an ever-exciting branch of actively working with industry on real-world engineering, providing plenty of stimulating applications career opportunities for graduates. As we n Opportunities to do paid placements both move into the future, aerospace engineers within our research groups and at our will have a central role in making society industrial partners more sustainable. I find the prospect of n Flexible programme structure, with optional hybrid and whole-electric planes particularly module choices and opportunities to do stimulating. Many challenges will have intercalated years in industry, abroad, or to be overcome. For hybrid planes, developing advanced computer science jet engines will have to be miniaturised in and programming skills order to act as on-board power stations, n Accredited by IOM3, which gives our and provide enough power for fans driven students a clear pathway to become by electric motors.
    [Show full text]
  • AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 9.1 Definition
    Page 1 of 8 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 9.1 Definition: Aerospace Engineering is the primary branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction, testing, science and technology of aircraft and spacecraft. It is divided into two major and overlapping branches: aeronautical engineering and astronautical engineering. Aeronautics deals with aircraft that operate in Earth's atmosphere, and astronautics deals with spacecraft that operate outside the Earth's atmosphere. Founded by dreamers and pioneers such as Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, the field reached its maturity with launching of first artificial satellite, first man in space and first step on the Moon. Aerospace Engineering deals with the design, construction, and study of the science behind the forces and physical properties of aircraft, rockets, flying craft, and spacecraft. The field also covers their aerodynamic characteristics and behaviors, airfoil, control surfaces, lift, drag, and other properties. Aeronautical engineering was the original term for the field. As flight technology advanced to include craft operating in outer space, the broader term "aerospace engineering" has largely replaced it in common usage. Aerospace engineering, particularly the astronautics branch, is often referred to colloquially as "rocket science", such as in popular culture. Overview Flight vehicles are subjected to demanding conditions such as those produced by changes in atmospheric pressure and temperature, with structural loads applied upon vehicle components. Consequently, they are usually the products of various technological and engineering disciplines including aerodynamics, propulsion, avionics, materials science, structural analysis and manufacturing. The interaction between these technologies is known as aerospace engineering. Because of the complexity and number of disciplines involved, aerospace engineering is carried out by teams of engineers, each having their own specialised area of expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering 1
    Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering 1 MECHANICAL, MATERIALS, AND AEROSPACE ENGINEERING John T. Rettaliata Engineering Center, Suite 243 10 W. 32nd St. Chicago, IL 60616 312.567.3175 [email protected] engineering.iit.edu/mmae Chair Sumanta Acharya Faculty with Research Interests For more information regarding faculty visit the Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering website. Illinois Institute of Technology’s (Illinois Tech) Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering (MMAE) Department today has an excellent group of tenured/tenure-track faculty with national and international reputations, memberships in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), journal editorships, and fellowships/major awards from all relevant professional societies (e.g., ASME, AIAA, APS, TMS, ASM). There are currently 27 tenure/tenure-track and full-time instructional faculty in the MMAE department; in addition, there are a number of adjunct faculty who support the department’s instructional and research missions. The major research strength areas are in the areas of dynamics and control, materials, fluid dynamics, thermal sciences, and mechanics. The Dynamics & Control group is active in the area of autonomous systems with major funding/research-activity in navigation systems, robotics, self-driving cars, transportation systems, and others. This group houses major research laboratories in robotics, navigation, space weather, and transportation (engines). The Materials group has research interests in material synthesis, material
    [Show full text]