DOCSLIB.ORG

Emory River Watershed (06010208) of the Tennessee River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emory River Watershed (06010208) of the Tennessee River Basin EMORY RIVER WATERSHED (06010208) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION August 29, 2002 EMORY RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Emory River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Emory River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Emory River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Emory River Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation. Ambient Sites. Those sites established for long term instream monitoring of water quality. ARAP. Aquatic Resource Alteration Permit. Assessment. The result of an analysis of how well streams meet the water quality criteria assigned to them. Bankfull Discharge. The momentary maximum peak flow before a stream overflows its banks onto a floodplain. Basin. An area that drains several smaller watersheds to a common point. Most watersheds in Tennessee are part of the Cumberland, Mississippi, or Tennessee Basin (The Conasauga River and Barren River Watersheds are the exceptions). Benthic. Bottom dwelling. Biorecon. A qualitative multihabitat assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates that allows rapid screening of a large number of sites. A Biorecon is one tool used to recognize stream impairment as judged by species richness measures, emphasizing the presence or absence of indicator organisms without regard to relative abundance. BMP. An engineered structure or management activity, or combination of these, that eliminates or reduces an adverse environmental effect of a pollutant. 1 Glossary BOD. Biochemical Oxygen Demand. A measure of the amount of oxygen consumed in the biological processes that break down organic and inorganic matter. CAFO. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. Designated Uses. The part of Water Quality Standards that describes the uses of surface waters assigned by the Water Quality Control Board. All streams in Tennessee are designated for Recreation, Fish and Aquatic Life, Irrigation, and Livestock Watering and Wildlife. Additional designated uses for some, but not all, waters are Drinking Water Supply, Industrial Water Supply, and Navigation. DMR. Discharge Monitoring Report. A report that must be submitted periodically to the Division of Water Pollution Control by NPDES permitees. DO. Dissolved oxygen. EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA Region 4 web site is http://www.epa.gov/region4/ Field Parameter. Determinations of water quality measurements and values made in the field using a kit or probe. Common field parameters include pH, DO, temperature, conductivity, and flow. Fluvial Geomorphology. The physical characteristics of moving water and adjoining landforms, and the processes by which each affects the other. HUC-8. The 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code corresponding to one of 54 watersheds in Tennessee. HUC-10. The 10-digit NRCS Hydrologic Unit Code. HUC-10 corresponds to a smaller land area than HUC-8. HUC-12. The 12-digit NRCS Hydrologic Unit Code. HUC-12 corresponds to a smaller land area than HUC-10. MRLC. Multi-Resolution Land Classification. MS4. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Nonpoint Source (NPS). Sources of water pollution without a single point of origin. Nonpoint sources of pollution are generally associated with surface runoff, which may carry sediment, chemicals, nutrients, pathogens, and toxic materials into receiving waterbodies. Section 319 of the Clean Water Act of 1987 requires all states to assess the impact of nonpoint source pollution on the waters of the state and to develop a program to abate this impact. NPDES. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Section 402 of the Clean Water Act of 1987 requires dischargers to waters of the U.S. to obtain NPDES permits. NRCS. Natural Resources Conservation Service. NRCS is part of the federal Department of Agriculture. The NRCS home page is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov 2 Glossary Point Source. Any discernable, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does not include agricultural storm water discharges and return flows from irrigated agriculture (Clean Water Act Section 502(14)). Q Design. The average daily flow that a treatment plant or other facility is designed to accommodate. Reference Stream (Reference Site). A stream (site) judged to be least impacted. Data from reference streams are used for comparisons with similar streams. SBR. Sequential Batch Reactor. Stakeholder. Any person or organization affected by the water quality or by any watershed management activity within a watershed. STATSGO. State Soil Geographic Database. STATSGO is compiled and maintained by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. STORET. The EPA repository for water quality data that is used by state environmental agencies, EPA and other federal agencies, universities, and private citizens. STORET (Storage and Retrieval of National Water Quality Data System) data can be accessed at http://www.epa.gov/storet/ TDA. Tennessee Department of Agriculture. The TDA web address is http://www.state.tn.us/agriculture TDEC. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. The TDEC web address is http://www.tdec.net TMDL. Total Maximum Daily Load. A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of the amount to the pollutant’s sources. A TMDL is the sum of the allowable loads of a single pollutant from all contributing point and nonpoint sources. The calculation includes a margin of safety to ensure that the waterbody can be used for the purposes the State has designated. The calculation must also account for seasonal variation in water quality. A TMDL is required for each pollutant in an impaired stream as described in Section 303 of the Federal Clean Water Act of 1987. Updates and information on Tennessee’s TMDLs can be found at http://www.tdec.net/wpc/tmdl/ TMSP. Tennessee Multi-Sector Permit. USGS. United States Geological Survey. USGS is part of the federal Department of the Interior. The USGS home page is http://www.usgs.gov/. WAS. Waste Activated Sludge. 3 Glossary Water Quality Standards. A triad of designated uses, water quality criteria, and antidegradation statement. Water Quality Standards are established by Tennessee and approved by EPA. Watershed. A geographic area which drains to a common outlet, such as a point on a larger stream, lake, underlying aquifer, estuary, wetland, or ocean. WET. Whole Effluent Toxicity. WWTP. Waste Water Treatment Plant 4 Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 WATERSHED APPROACH TO WATER QUALITY 1.1 Background 1.2 Watershed Approach to Water Quality 1.2.A. Components of the Watershed Approach 1.2.B. Benefits of the Watershed Approach 1.1 BACKGROUND. The Division of Water Pollution Control is responsible for administration of the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act of 1977 (TCA 69−3−101). Information about the Division of Water Pollution Control, updates and announcements, may be found at http://www.state.tn.us/environment/wpc/index.html, and a summary of the organization of the Division of Water Pollution Control may be found in Appendix I. The mission of the Division of Water Pollution Control is to abate existing pollution of the waters of Tennessee, to reclaim polluted waters, to prevent the future pollution of the waters, and to plan for the future use of the waters so that the water resources of Tennessee might be used and enjoyed to the fullest extent consistent with the maintenance of unpolluted waters. The Division monitors, analyzes, and reports on the quality of Tennessee's water. In order to perform these tasks more effectively, the Division adopted a Watershed Approach to Water Quality in 1996. This Chapter summarizes TDEC's Watershed Approach to Water Quality. 1.2 WATERSHED APPROACH TO WATER QUALITY. The Watershed Approach to Water Quality is a coordinating framework designed to protect and restore aquatic systems and protect human health more effectively (EPA841-R-95-003). The Approach is based on the concept that many water quality problems, like the accumulation of pollutants or nonpoint source pollution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The John Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons John Muir Newsletters John Muir Papers Winter 12-1-2010 The ohnJ Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011 The ohnJ Muir Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmn Part of the American Studies Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation The oJ hn Muir Center, "The oJ hn Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011" (2010). John Muir Newsletters. 91. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmn/91 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the John Muir Papers at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in John Muir Newsletters by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Winter 2010/2011 J 0 H N M U I R CENTER SPECIAL JOHN MUIR'S POINTS OF CROSSING OF THE CUMBERLAND INTEREST: By Dan Styer John Muir - who records the intertwined feelings of ecstasy Muir encountered Oberlin College, would later ac­ ("miles and miles of beauty") and of despair ("I mountains for the Oberlin, Ohio quire the nick­ hardly dare to think of home and friends") fa­ first time in his life name John miliar to many long-distance solitary wilderness at the age of o'Mountains - encountered mountains for the travelers.6 twenty-nine years. first time in his life at the age of twenty-nine These three days also held superlative en­ years, on Muir's crossing of ~===-====:--::---==-~==---, counters with nature: On September 10, September Muir "began the ascent of the Cumber- the Cumberland provided some of 10, 11,and land Mountains, the first real mountains the best human 12, 1867, that my foot ever touched or eyes be- stories found in A when he held ..
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fuels and Water Quality 75
    Chapter 4 Lucy Allen, Michael J. Cohen, David Abelson, and Bart Miller Fossil fuels are essential to the global economy—for electricity production, transporta- tion, plastics and chemicals manufacturing, heating, and many other purposes. How- ever,Fossil the extraction Fuels and processing and of fossil Water fuels, in addition Quality to their use, have profound impacts on the environment and natural resources, including water. Large oil spills— such as the recent Deepwater Horizon drilling rig spill, which leaked over 4.9 million barrels (780,000 cubic meters) of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico—have focused atten- tion on the potential for disasters associated with oil drilling to cause contamination of the natural environment (Lubchenco et al. 2010). The growing recognition of the seri- ous risks to surface-water and groundwater quality from natural gas fracking operations also raises new questions. And even normal fossil-fuel extraction and refining processes pollute the environment. The connections between water and energy have been studied in recent years, with growing recognition of how closely the two are linked. Water is used, in varying quanti- ties and ways, in every step of fossil-fuel extraction and processing (Ptacek et al. 2004). For example, the amount of coal produced worldwide in 2009 required an estimated 1.3 to 4.5 billion cubic meters (m3) of water for extraction and processing.1 Oil refining requires approximately 4 to 8 million m3 of water daily in the United States alone (the amount of water that two to three million U.S. households use daily) (US DOE 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations
    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee
    Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee By P. H. CARRIGAN, JR. TRANSPORT OF RADIONUCLIDES BY STREAMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Abstract _ _ ________________ II Results continued Introduction. _______________ 1 Retention factors.______________________________ 112 Acknowledgments___ _______ 3 Distribution of radionuclides_____________________ 13 Coring procedures and results.. 4 Longitudinal distribution.___________________ 13 Selection of sampling sites. 4 Vertical distribution_______________________ 14 Coring tools____________ 5 Contribution to inventory from reaches outside of Results of coring. ________ 5 study reach__________________________________ 14 Core processing_____________ 7 Distribution of sediment..-_______________________ 15 Computation of inventory. 9 Physical properties____________________________ 16 Results. _____________________
    [Show full text]
  • Outstandingly Remarkable Values, Obed Wild and Scenic River
    National Park Service OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER U.S. Department of the Interior TENNESSEE OUtstANDINGLY REMARKABLE VALUES Dear Friends of the Obed Wild and Scenic River, What comes to mind when you think about the Obed Wild and Scenic River? A wild river and its tributaries flowing through a rugged landscape of spectacular gorges? The thrill of a demanding whitewater boating experience? A family-friendly place to explore the magnificent scenery of the Cumberland Plateau? A place that compels us to learn about the abundant diversity of a fragile ecosystem or to better understand the history of those who thrived on this land before us? The Obed Wild and Scenic River is all of this, and much more. To help us protect this river system for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations, we have contemplated this very question to determine what makes it truly outstandingly remarkable. Based on the hard work of my staff and others within the National Park Service, I am pleased to present to you the outstandingly remarkable values of the Obed Wild and Scenic River. The statements that follow have been developed to provide a strong foundation for the future management and protection of this nationally significant river system—to help us focus our daily attention on the river’s most important aspects. I urge you to read these statements and to share your thoughts with us about what makes the Obed so outstandingly remarkable to you. Thank you for sharing your passion for the Obed Wild and Scenic River by helping to shape its future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1958 The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee Robert Audubon Ladd University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Ladd, Robert Audubon, "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1958. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3077 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Administration. Orin B. Graff, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: ARRAY(0x7f6fff323d18) Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) July 31, 1958 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a the-sis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I recommend that it be accepted for nine quarter hours of credit in partial fulfillment of the rewl.irements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Aillninistration and Supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee
    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 193-211 FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER, TENNESSEE Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Joseph F. Connell2, Steve Bakaletz3, and Mark T. Fagg4 ABSTRACT The Obed River was designated as a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) in 1976 and is a unit of the National Park Service. The river is considered to be among the highest quality in the state of Tennessee supporting a rich ecological diversity. Two federally listed species (one fish and one mussel) occur in the Obed: spotfin chub Cyprinella monacha, and purple bean Villosa perpurpurea. The Obed is a major tributary to the upper Emory River. Historical mussel collections and recent sampling have documented 27 species in the drainage. Freshwater mussel sampling was relegated to the Obed WSR and tributaries to determine species composition, abundance, and whether reproduction and recruitment is occurring to the fauna. Mussel sampling was conducted from 2000-2001 within the boundaries of the WSR at access points throughout the length of the Obed including portions of the upper Emory River, Daddy’s, Clear, and Whites creek. A total of 585 mussels representing nine species were found during the study. The most abundant mussel found was Villosa iris that comprised 55% of the fauna, followed by Lampsilis fasciola 19% and Medionidus conradicus 14%. The federally endangered V. perpurpurea was represented at 3%. Two species, Pleuronaia barnesiana (live) and Lampsilis cardium (fresh dead), were found as single individuals and P. barnesiana is a new distribution record for the Obed. The mussel fauna in the Obed WSR is relatively rare and historically the river may never have had a more diverse fauna because of the biologically non-productive nature of shale and sandstone that characterize streams on the Cumberland Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Year Parks & Recreation Master Plan
    10 YEAR PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2020 Cover Image courtesy of Eric Barger 10 YEAR PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ron Woody, Roane County Executive Director Mike Beard, Roane County Parks and Recreation Director Timothy Neal, City of Kingston Mayor Mike “Brillo” Miller, City of Rockwood Mayor Special Thanks to the following for their efforts and contributions Chase Clem, Kingston Parks and Recreation Director Becky Ruppe, Rockwood City Administrator / Coordinator Amber Cofer, Roane County Executive Assistant Jamie Kinard, Roane County Grant Administrator Connie Cook, Roane County Director of Accounts and Budgets Carolyn Brewer, Director of Kingston Finance Department Pam May, President of The Roane Alliance 10 YEAR PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2020 PREPARED BY Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 General Benefits of Parks and Recreation 1.2 Plan Origin and Planning Process 1.3 Parks and Recreation in Roane County 1.4 Other Planning Studies Consulted 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 19 3.1 Demographics 3.1.1 Population Health Data 3.1.2 Roane County 3.1.3 Kingston 3.1.4 Rockwood 3.2 Regional Context 3.3 Existing Park and Recreation Facilities 3.3.1 Roane County Park 3.3.2 Kingston Parks 3.3.3 Rockwood Parks 3.3.4 Blueways, Greenways, and Trails TN RiverLine 652 Oak Ridge Natural Asset Plan Caney Creek Recreation Area 3.4 Programs and Community Events 3.4.1Recreational Programs 3.4.2Community Events 3.5 Administration, Budgeting and Management 3.5.1 Roane
    [Show full text]
  • WECEWH) 77? United States Department of the Interior National Park Service F JUL 0 6 1998 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 *' )MB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) WECEWH) 77? United States Department of the Interior National Park Service f JUL 0 6 1998 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to foompiete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 1&). Complete each item by marking "x" in the^ppropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Cumberland Mountain School historic name other names/site number Cumberland Camp Ground 2. Location Old U. S. Highway 127 North street & number _ u not for publication Crossville city or town __ u vicinity Tennessee . TN . Cumberland state code ___ county ________ code ^^ zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [29 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 35 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 03 meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History of Kate Bradley and Community Organizing in Appalachia
    Evangeline Mee “Working with One Hand and Fighting with the Other”: An Oral History of Kate Bradley and Community Organizing in Appalachia traces J.W. and Kate Bradley in their home in Wartburg, Tennessee. (Photo courtesy of Margaret Ecker.) Afer meeting with a Berkeley professor in folklore who told me, candidly, that among other things he did not care very much about my feldwork experience as an undergraduate, I returned home to Knoxville, Tennessee, somewhat demoralized. Te professor had said he was more concerned with the theory-based side of folkloristics. Sure, I knew about the South, but could I deconstruct the Eurocentric genealogy of folklore? “Read Lacan and come back,” he said curtly. 230 Evangeline Mee My studies in folklore had been debunked, or so I felt. But just a few days later I found myself driving an hour west to interview two community and environmental justice activists for the Southern Oral History Program’s “Long Women’s Movement in the American South” collection. A confuence of interests, both academic and personal, brought me to the home of W. and Kate Bradley in Wartburg, Tennessee, that day. Te Smoky and Cumberland Mountains are a vital part of my family life, as they are for many east Tennesseans. Te mountains hold the memories of my childhood and young adult life, and they are integral to my idea of home and sense of place. Te environmental, economic, and social violation of mountain communities by the coal industry was therefore an urgent issue to me. Additionally, my interest in social and oral history attracted me to stories of resistance coming from afected communities, and to women activists in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Discrete Water Quality Monitoring at Big South Fork
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Long-Term Discrete Water Quality Monitoring at Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Blue Ridge Parkway, and Obed Wild and Scenic River Protocol Narrative Natural Resource Report NPS/APHN/NRR—2018/1840 ON THE COVER Morning mist rising from the Big South Fork near Pine Creek. Photograph by Evan Raskin. Long-Term Discrete Water Quality Monitoring at Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Blue Ridge Parkway, and Obed Wild and Scenic River Protocol Narrative Natural Resource Report NPS/APHN/NRR—2018/1840 James Hughes1, Robert Emmott2, Evan Raskin2, and Brian Witcher2 1Appalachian Highlands Inventory and Monitoring Network c/o Big South Fork NRRA 4564 Leatherwood Road Oneida, Tennessee 37841 2Appalachian Highlands Inventory and Monitoring Network c/o Blue Ridge Parkway 67 Ranger Drive Asheville, North Carolina 28805 December 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Sickle Darter (Percina Williamsi) Species Status Assessment
    Sickle Darter (Percina williamsi) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo courtesy of Crystal Ruble, Conservation Fisheries, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee U.S Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic – Gulf Region Atlanta, Georgia March 2020 Draft Sickle Darter SSA This document was prepared by Dr. Michael A. Floyd, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office, Frankfort, Kentucky. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service greatly appreciates the assistance of Dr. Brian Alford (The Ohio State University), Todd Amacker (Todd Amacker Conservation Visuals), Bart Carter (Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA)), Luke Etchison (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission), Brian Evans (Service – Atlanta, Georgia), Krishna Gifford (Service – Hadley, Massachusetts), Kyler Hecke (The University of Tennessee), Karen Horodysky (Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF)), Dr. Bernie Kuhajda (Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute (TNACI), David Matthews (Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)), Dr. Dave Neely (TNACI), Michael Pinder (VDGIF), Pat Rakes (Conservation Fisheries, Inc. (CFI)), Judith Ratcliffe (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program), Jordan Richard (Service – Virginia Field Office), Steve Roble (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation), Crystal Ruble (CFI), J.R. Shute (CFI), Jeff Simmons (TVA), Kurt Snider (Service – Tennessee Field Office), Warren Stiles (Service – Tennessee Field Office), Dr. Matthew Thomas (KDFWR), Stephanie Williams (Tennessee Department of Environment
    [Show full text]