DOCSLIB.ORG

RBM Institutional Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RBM Institutional Review Irrigation Sector Reform Activity: RBM Sub-activity Institutional and Monitoring Framework Report Deliverable 7 Millennium Challenge Account Moldova Ref. project 278168 Euroconsult Mott MacDonald in association with: ACDI/VOCA ACSA Agland Milieu NGO BIOS July 2011 River Basin Management Sub- Activity Institutional and Monitoring Framework Report July 2011 MCA Moldova 21, Iorga Nicolae St, office 5 Chisinau, MD-2012 Republic of Moldova Mott MacDonald, Amsterdamseweg 15, 6814 CM Arnhem, PO Box 441, 6800 AK, Arnhem, Netherlands T +31 (0)26 3577 111 F +31 (0)26 3577 577 W www.mottmac.com Green corner – Save a tree today! Mott MacDonald is committed to integrating sustainability into our operational practices and culture. As a world leading consultancy business we are always seeking to improve our own performance and reduce the environmental impact of our business. Meanwhile, many of our staff are committed to living sustainably in their personal lives – as an employee-owned company Mott MacDonald shares their concerns. We feel an ethical obligation to reduce our emissions and resource use and have committed to reducing our per capita carbon footprint by a minimum of 5% year on year. We print our reports and client submissions using recycled, double-sided paper. Compared to printing single sided on A4 virgin paper, double sided printing on recycled paper saves the equivalent of two trees, over a ton of CO2 and a cubic metre of landfill space for every 100 reams. By choosing the greener path we have been able to achieve efficiencies benefiting both Mott MacDonald and our customers. We would like to share some of the principles of our own ‘Going Green’ initiative: • When possible we scan rather than print and consider what really needs to be on paper • We use electronic faxing when practicable • We work on e-forms • We use recycled paper when possible and print on both sides • Reducing paper in the office creates a better working environment for our staff and our clients We believe that you, as one of our esteemed clients, will share our concern to conserve precious resources for the benefit of our planet and its inhabitants. Institutional and Monitoring Framework Report Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0.0.3 April 2011 Ron Manley 2.3 1 May 2011 Ludmila Gofman Ron Manley Caroline la Submission of first draft to MCA Chapelle 3.00 18 May 2011 Ludmila Gofman Gary Merkley Enhancements and modifications Ron Manley according to MCA comments and Paul Buijs internal criteria Maxim Gorgan Paul Holmes Alexander Mueller Marcella Nanni Luc Verelst 3.1 31 May 2011 Ludmila Gofman Gary Merkley Caroline la Final editing and report organization Chapelle 4 1 June 2011 Caroline la Submission to client Chapelle 5 22 July 2011 Ludmila Gofman Gary Merkley Caroline la Modifications according to MCA Chapelle comments of 07 July 2011 This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. T +31 (0)26 3577 111 F +31 (0)26 3577 577 W www.mottmac.com Institutional and Monitoring Framework Report Content Section Page List of Abbreviations 7 Executive Summary 9 1. Introduction 21 1.1 Scope of Work for the RBM Sub-activity ______________________________________________ 21 1.2 Institutional and Monitoring Framework Review Process _________________________________ 21 1.3 Status of the Report ______________________________________________________________ 22 1.4 Irrigation in Moldova ______________________________________________________________ 22 1.5 River Basin Management in Moldova ________________________________________________ 22 1.6 Legal and Institutional Framework ___________________________________________________ 23 1.6.1 National ______________________________________________________________________ 23 1.6.2 International ___________________________________________________________________ 25 2. River Basin Management 28 2.1 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 28 2.2 River Basin Management – Best Practice _____________________________________________ 29 2.2.1 Integrated Water Resource Management ____________________________________________ 29 2.2.2 Elements of Good Practice in Integrated River Basin Management ________________________ 31 2.2.3 Water Framework Directive _______________________________________________________ 32 2.3 International Practice _____________________________________________________________ 37 2.3.1 Basin Management _____________________________________________________________ 37 2.3.2 Personnel and Budgets __________________________________________________________ 37 2.3.3 Approach of Specific Countries ____________________________________________________ 38 2.4 Water Charges __________________________________________________________________ 40 2.4.1 United Kingdom ________________________________________________________________ 41 2.4.2 Abstraction ___________________________________________________________________ 41 2.4.3 Discharges ___________________________________________________________________ 42 2.4.4 Solid Waste ___________________________________________________________________ 43 2.4.5 France _______________________________________________________________________ 43 2.4.6 Example of Agence d’Eau Seine-Normandie _________________________________________ 44 2.4.7 Diffuse Pollution _______________________________________________________________ 45 2.5 Comparison of Charging Schemes __________________________________________________ 45 2.5.1 Similarities ____________________________________________________________________ 45 2.5.2 Differences ___________________________________________________________________ 46 2.6 River Basin Management Process ___________________________________________________ 46 2.6.1 Sequence of Activities ___________________________________________________________ 46 2.6.2 Objectives ____________________________________________________________________ 46 2.6.3 Baseline ______________________________________________________________________ 47 Euroconsult Mott MacDonald i Institutional and Monitoring Framework Report 2.6.4 Initial Appraisal ________________________________________________________________ 47 2.6.5 Options ______________________________________________________________________ 47 2.6.6 Draft River Basin Management Plan ________________________________________________ 47 2.6.7 River Basin Management Plan ____________________________________________________ 47 2.6.8 Implementation ________________________________________________________________ 47 2.6.9 Monitoring and Evaluation ________________________________________________________ 47 2.6.10 Reappraisal __________________________________________________________________ 48 3. Institutional Framework for Water Resources Management 49 3.1 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 49 3.2 Key Water Management Institutions _________________________________________________ 49 3.2.1 Data Exchange ________________________________________________________________ 53 3.3 Findings _______________________________________________________________________ 53 3.3.1 Institutional Analysis ____________________________________________________________ 53 3.4 Water Law _____________________________________________________________________ 55 3.4.1 Existing Water Legislation ________________________________________________________ 55 3.5 Study Tour _____________________________________________________________________ 68 3.5.1 Requirements _________________________________________________________________ 68 3.5.2 Climate ______________________________________________________________________ 68 3.5.3 Agriculture ____________________________________________________________________ 70 3.5.4 Water Management _____________________________________________________________ 71 3.6 Recommendations _______________________________________________________________ 72 3.6.1 Possible Institutional Scenarios and Recommended Choice _____________________________ 72 3.6.2 Economic Mechanisms __________________________________________________________ 76 3.6.3 Study Tour ____________________________________________________________________ 78 4. Monitoring and Data Management 80 4.1 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 80 4.2 Water Abstraction and Discharge ___________________________________________________ 80 4.2.1 Water Abstractions and Discharge Permits __________________________________________ 82 4.2.2 Monitoring of Abstractions and Discharges __________________________________________ 83 4.3 Meteorology ____________________________________________________________________ 84 4.4 Hydrology ______________________________________________________________________ 86 4.4.1 Current Network - Surface Water Flows _____________________________________________ 86 4.5 Groundwater Monitoring ___________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementa on of Basin Management Principle
    Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia European Union Water Iniave Naonal Policy Dialogues progress report 2016 May 2016 Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia ii Copyright © 2016 United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development The designaons employed and the presentaon of the material in this publicaon do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the delimitaon of its froners or boundaries. This publicaon has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. CONTACT INFORMATION Convenon on the Protecon and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Internaonal Lakes United Naons Economic Commission for Europe Organizaon for Economic Co-operaon and Development Palais des Naons 2 rue André-Pascal CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France Tel.: + 41 22 917 1193 Tel.: + 33 1 4524 9294 Fax: + 41 22 917 0107 Fax: + 33 1 4430 6183 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unece.org/env/water/npd Website: www.oecd.org/env/outreach/npd-water-eecca.htm Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia iii CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................... iv FOREWORD .................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By
    P a g e | 1 ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument (NEAR) Agreement reference No ENPI/2014/354-587 Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project financed by the European Union Final Report Support to Confidence Building Measures, 15 March 2015-31 December 2018 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 P a g e | 2 Project Title: Support to Confidence Building Measures Starting date: 15 March 2015 Report end date: 31 December 2018 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River ENPI/2014/354-587 Final Report (15 March 2015 - 31 December 2018) – submitted by UNDP Moldova P a g e | 3 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. PROGRESS UPDATE ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. KEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Procuratura Generală
    Republica Moldova PROCURATURA GENERALĂ ORDIN Nr. OPG24/28/2016 din 24.09.2016 cu privire la aprobarea Regulamentului Procuraturii Publicat : 28.10.2016 în MONITORUL OFICIAL Nr. 369-378 art. 1798 Data intrării în vigoare MODIFICAT OPG26/23 din 10.03.20, MO94-98/27.03.20 art.323; în vigoare 27.04.20 În scopul reglementării activităţii Procuraturii, asigurării unei interacţiuni eficiente între subdiviziunile Procuraturii Generale, procuraturile specializate și teritoriale, în temeiul art.11 alin (1), lit. e) din Legea cu privire la Procuratură nr. 3 din 25.02.2016, O R D O N: 1. Se aprobă Regulamentul Procuraturii (se anexează). 2. Procurorii-șefi ai procuraturilor specializate și teritoriale, şefii subdiviziunilor Procuraturii Generale vor organiza studierea Regulamentului Procuraturii de către personalul din subordine. 3. Adjuncţii Procurorului General, şefii subdiviziunilor Procuraturii Generale vor asigura respectarea strictă a prevederilor Regulamentului Procuraturii. 4. Se abrogă ordinele Procurorului General nr. 52/3 din 21 iulie 2010 cu privire la aprobarea Regulamentului Procuraturii Generale şi nr. 85/7 din 27.10.2010, nr. 80/09 din 23.11.2012, nr. 57/3 din 12.09.2012, nr. 1/09 din 04.01.2013, nr. 9/28 din 30.01.2013, nr. 20/28 din 12.03.2013, nr. 17/28 din 25.02.2013, nr. 1323-p din 17.10.2013, nr. 27/28 din 14.08.2015 privind modificarea Regulamentului Procuraturii Generale. 5. Ordinul se aduce la cunoştinţa angajaţilor Procuraturii. 6. Controlul asupra executării prevederilor prezentului ordin mi-l asum. PROCURORUL GENERAL-INTERIMAR Eduard HARUNJEN Nr. 24/28. Chişinău, 24 septembrie 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 2385 Bushmakiu Et Al Review of Macroinvertebrate Hydrobionts.Indd
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA Acta Zool. Bulg., 73 (1), March 2021: 31-50 Zoogeography and Faunistics Published online 30 October 2020 Research Article http://www.acta-zoologica-bulgarica.eu/002385 Review of Aquatic Arthropods (Phylum Arthropoda) in the Republic of Moldova Oxana Munjiu, Galina Buşmachiu*, Tatiana Şuleşco, Igor Șuberneţkii & Ion Toderaş Institute of Zoology, 1 Academiei Street, MD-2028 Chișinău, Republic of Moldova Abstract: The first review of aquatic arthropods from the Republic of Moldova is presented. It is based on literature data and faunistic materials collected in 1946–2018 by researchers of the Institute of Zoology, Chișinău. The checklist includes data about 461 species belonging to six classes: Arachnida (one species), Bran- chiopoda (two species), Malacostraca (53 species), Maxillopoda (one species), Collembola (six species) and Insecta (398 species). The distribution of the species across the four freshwater basins in the country (Dniester River Basin, Prut River Basin, Danube River Basin and Black Sea Basin) is given. In addition, data on the species occurring in artificial reservoirs are also presented. Psychomyia pusilla (Fabricius, 1781) (order Trichoptera) is a new record for the country. The present study contains previously unpub- lished data about further 20 species of Insecta (19 species) and Malacostraca (one species) from the labo- ratory archive of the Institute of Zoology, Chișinău. Key words: Freshwater arthropods, list of species, Dniester River Basin, Prut River Basin, Eastern Europe public of Moldova were published at the beginning of Introduction the 20th century (Brauner 1910, Miller & Zubovs- The Republic of Moldova has a rather small territo- ky 1917, Bening 1928, Schellenberg 1937).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins This project is implemented by a Consortium led by Hulla and Co. (EPIRB) HumanDynamics KG Contract No 2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi Project Funded by Ministry of Environment the European Union DRAFT THE PRUT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 - 2021 Prepared in alignment to the EuropeanWater Framework Directive2000/60/EC Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau, 2015 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.General description of the Prut River Basin ................................................................................. 7 1.1. Natural conditions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Climate and vegetation................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2. Geological structure and geomorphology ....................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Surface water resources.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.3.1. Rivers .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republica Moldova – 25 De Ani. Repere Istorice. Istoria
    Lucrarea a fost recomandată spre publicare la şedinţa Consiliului ştiinţific al Bibliotecii Științifice Centrale „Andrei Lupan” (Institut) din 22 august 2016, proces-verbal nr. 14 Referenţi ştiinţifici: acad. Gheorghe Rusnac dr. hab. Nicolae Enciu dr. hab. Victor Juc Responsabil de ediție: dr. Didina Țăruș Redactor: Vitalie Ţurcanu Corectori: Elena Pistrui, Elena Varzari Coperta: Vitaliu Pogolșa Machetare: Valeriu Oprea Imagine pagina de titlu: Logoul „Moldova-25”. Autor: Simion Zamșa Logoul „Academia de Științe a Moldovei-70”. Autor: Vitaliu Pogolșa DESCRIEREA CIP A CAMEREI NAŢIONALE A CĂRŢII Dragnev, Demir. Republica Moldova – 25 ani. Repere istorice. Istoria ştiinţei / Demir Dragnev, Constantin Manolache, Ion Valer Xenofontov ; ref. şt.: Gheorghe Rusnac [et al.] ; resp. ed.: Didina Ţăruş ; Acad. de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, Bibl. Şt. Centrală «Andrei Lupan» (Inst.), Centrul de Cercetări Enciclopedice. – Chişinău : Biblioteca Ştiinţifică Centrală, 2016 (F.E.-P. «Tipografia Centrală»). – 160 p. Bibliogr.: p. 157-158. – 300 ex. ISBN 978-9975-3089-7-7. 94(478)”1991/2016”+001.32(478) D 75 Lucrarea este elaborată în legătură cu aniversarea a 25 de ani de la proclamarea independenței Republicii Moldova, 70 de ani de la crearea primelor instituții academice de cercetare și 55 de ani de la fondarea Academiei de Științe a Moldovei. Într-o formă comprimată sunt prezentate elementele simbolice ale statului, datele generale, reperele istorice și de istorie a științei, personalitățile care au condus Republica Moldova, membrii Academiei de Științe a Moldovei. În exclusivitate pentru istoriografia recentă se prezintă un tabel cronologic referitor la principalele evenimente din viața publică a Republicii Moldova pe parcursul a 25 de ani și evoluția științei din spațiul actual al Republicii Moldova în ultimii 70 de ani.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused significant amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fy 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2012 Rule of Law Institutional Strengthening Program (ROLISP) USAID Contract No. AID-117-C-12-00002 Prepared by: Frederick G. Yeager COP Activity Office: USAID/Moldova COR: Ina Pislaru, September 30, 2012 Submitted October 15, 2012 by: Frederick G. Yeager, Chief of Party Checchi and Company Consulting, Inc. ROLISP Program 27 Armenesca Street 1 Chisinau, Moldova Contents FY 2012 ANNUAL REPORT ON EXPECTED RESUTS AND ACTIVITIES .............................................. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 8 OBJECTIVE 1: ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS, TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE MOLDOVAN JUDICIARY THROUGH STRENGTHENING THE CAPACITY OF THE SCM AND THE DJA .......................................... 8 OBJECTIVE 2: STRENGTHEN THE INSTITUTIONAL AND OPERATIONAL CAPACITY OF THE NIJ ........................... 11 • Modernize CLE Training Content ..................................................................................................... 13 • Develop guidelines for interpreting the ICMS statistical data .......................................................... 13 OBJECTIVE 3: INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO MONITOR AND ADVOCATE FOR JUSTICE SECTOR REFORMS AND IMPROVE PUBLIC LEGAL AWARENESS THUS INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN MOLDOVA ...................................................................................................................................... 14 PUBLIC-PRIVATE
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2009
    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Privind Modificarea Unor Hotărîri Ale Guvernului
    GUVERNUL REPUBLICII MOLDOVA H O T Ă R Î R E nr._______ din ____________________________________ Chișinău Privind modificarea unor hotărîri ale Guvernului ------------------------------------------------------- În temeiul art. 11 alin. (4) și art. 32 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 215/2011 cu privire la frontiera de stat a Republicii Moldova (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2012, nr. 76-80, art. 243), Guvernul HOTĂRĂȘTE: Se aprobă modificările ce se operează în unele hotărîri ale Guvernului (se anexează). Prim-ministru PAVEL FILIP Contrasemnează: Ministrul afacerilor interne Alexandru Jizdan Ministrul agriculturii, dezvoltării regionale şi mediului Nicolae Ciubuc Y:\007\ANUL 2018\HOTARARI\20851\20851-redactat-ro.docx 3 Aprobate prin Hotărîrea Guvernului nr. MODIFICĂRILE ce se operează în unele hotărîri ale Guvernului 1. Regulamentul circulației rutiere, aprobat prin Hotărîrea Guvernului nr. 357/2009 (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2009, nr. 92-93, art. 409), se modifică după cum urmează: 1) la secțiunea V din anexa nr. 3, lit. a) se completează cu următoarele indicatoare de informare: „ 5.571.1 5.571.2 Zonă de frontieră Sfîrșitul zonei de frontieră”; 2) la secțiunea V din Semnificația indicatoarelor rutiere și particularitățile de utilizare a acestora, lit. a) se completează cu pct. 5.571.1 și 5.571.2 cu următorul cuprins: „5.571.1 „Zonă de frontieră” – indică începutul zonei cu lăţimea de 10 km de la frontiera de stat către interior, de-a lungul frontierei pe uscat şi pe apele de frontieră, în care se instituie regimul zonei de frontieră în conformitate cu prevederile Legii nr. 215/2011 cu privire la frontiera de stat a Republicii Moldova.
    [Show full text]
  • Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity
    ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA DEPARTMENT OF NATURE AND LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY Actual problems of protection and sustainable use of ThE animal world diversity International Conference of Zoologists dedicated to the 50th anniversary from the foundation of Institute of Zoology of ASM Chisinau – 2011 ACTUAL PRObLEMS OF PROTECTION AND SUSTAINAbLE USE OF ThE ANIMAL wORLD DIVERSITY Content CZU 59/599:502.74 (082) D 53 Dumitru Murariu. READING ABOUT SPECIES CONCEPT IN BIOLOGY.......................................................................10 Dan Munteanu. AChievements Of Romania in ThE field Of nature The materials of International Conference of Zoologists „Actual problems of protection and protection and implementation Of European Union’S rules concerning ThE biodiversity conservation (1990-2010)...............................................................................11 sustainable use of animal world diversity” organized by the Institute of Zoology of the Aca- demy of Sciences of Moldova in celebration of the 50th anniversary of its foundation are a gene- Laszlo Varadi. ThE protection and sustainable use Of Aquatic resources.....................................13 ralization of the latest scientific researches in the country and abroad concerning the diversity of aquatic and terrestrial animal communities, molecular-genetic methods in systematics, phylo- Terrestrial Vertebrates.................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRAȚIA PUBLICĂ: Prin Reformare Spre Modernizare
    U N I V E R S I T A T E A D E S T A T D I N M O L D O V A Facultatea de Relații Internaționale, Științe Politice și Administrative Catedra Științe Administrative Aurel SÎMBOTEANU ADMINISTRAȚIA PUBLICĂ: prin reformare spre modernizare Culegere de studii Chișinău, 2013 CEP USM CZU Recomandată spre editare de Catedra Ştiinţe Administrative și de Comisia de Asigurare a Calității din cadrul Facultăţii de Relaţii Internaţionale, Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative a Universităţii de Stat din Moldova Recenzenți: Constantin Solomon, doctor habilitat în științe politice, profesor universitar Igor Bucataru, doctor în științe politice, conferențiar universitar Sîmboteanu, Aurel. Administraţia publică: prin reformare spre modernizare: Culeg. de studii / Aurel Sîmboteanu; Univ. de Stat din Moldova, Fac. de Relaţii Intern., Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative, Catedra Ştiinţe Administrative. – Ch.: CEP USM. – 348 p. Bibliogr.: p. 346. – 50 ex. ISBN 978-9975-71-349-8. 351/354(075) S 56 © Aurel Sîmboteanu, 2013 © USM, 2013 CUPRINS Prefață ................................................................................................................. 5 Preface .................................................................................................................. 6 Предисловие ...................................................................................................... 7 Reforma administrației publice și rolul personalului în desfășurarea ei ............. 9 Principiile autoadministrării în contextul democrației locale ..........................
    [Show full text]