Bioenergy Support for the Department of Energy and Climate Change
Response to Tender No: TRN 583/02/2013
11th April 2013
Tender response from the NNFCC
NNFCC
NNFCC is a leading international consultancy with expertise on the conversion of biomass to bioenergy, biofuels and bio-based products.
NNFCC, Biocentre, Phone: +44 (0)1904 435182 York Science Park, Fax: +44 (0)1904 435345 Innovation Way, E: [email protected] Heslington, York, Web: www.nnfcc.co.uk YO10 5DG.
Page 2 of 70 1 Contents
1 Contents ...... 3 2 Executive summary ...... 5 2.1 Contact details ...... 7 2.2 Registered company details ...... 7 3 Meeting the specification ...... 8 3.1 Background ...... 8 3.2 Outline of requirements ...... 13 3.3 Approaches to delivery ...... 13 3.3.1 The NNFCC ...... 13 3.3.2 Skills and experience ...... 14 3.3.3 Market analysis ...... 14 3.3.3.1 Bioenergy deployment analysis ...... 16 3.3.3.2 Barriers matrix ...... 16 3.3.3.3 Bioenergy infrastructure analysis ...... 16 3.3.3.4 Bioenergy Strategy ...... 17 3.3.4 Techno-economic assessment ...... 17 3.3.4.1 Consultation on re-introduction of gross CV for definition of ACT‟s ...... 18 3.3.4.2 Official Solid and Gaseous Biomass Carbon Calculator ...... 19 3.3.4.3 Biomass CCS ...... 19 3.3.4.4 Farm-scale AD plant efficiency...... 19 3.3.4.5 Review of finance barriers ...... 20 3.3.4.6 Value of upgrading waste to WDF for fuelling ACT‟s ...... 20 3.3.5 Policies and incentives ...... 20 3.3.5.1 RO banding review (released Oct 2011) ...... 22 3.3.5.2 Review of energy crops definition, RO Banding Review ...... 22 3.3.5.3 Ad-hoc renewable financial incentives support ...... 23 3.3.5.4 RO sustainability standards ...... 23 3.3.5.5 AD Strategy & Action Plan ...... 23 3.4 Resources to aid delivery ...... 24 3.4.1 NNFCC links to others ...... 24 3.4.1.1 Commercial interactions ...... 27 3.4.2 NNFCC information sources ...... 28 3.5 Matching DECC‟s requirement ...... 29
Page 3 of 70 3.6 Ensuring timely delivery ...... 30 3.7 Quality assurance ...... 31 3.7.1 Project management ...... 31 3.7.1.1 Agreeing ...... 32 3.7.1.2 Ensuring ...... 32 3.7.2 Oversight and peer review ...... 33 3.8 Confidentiality and security of data ...... 33 ...... 34 3.9 Types of output ...... 34 4 Costs and charging arrangements ...... 35 ...... 35 ...... 36 5 Experience of the staff to deliver on DECC‟s aims and objectives ...... 37 5.1 The project team ...... 37 5.2 Individual staff skill areas ...... 38 5.2.1 David Turley, Policy & Strategy Manager ...... 38 5.2.2 Lucy Hopwood, Head of Biomass and Biogas ...... 38 5.2.3 Dr Geraint Evans, Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy ...... 39 5.2.4 Dr John Williams, Head of Materials for Energy and Industry ...... 39 5.2.5 Dr Adrian Higson, Head of Biorefining ...... 39 5.2.6 Fiona McDermott, Senior Consultant ...... 39 5.2.7 Lucy Nattrass, Senior Consultant ...... 40 5.2.8 Michael Goldsworthy, Consultant ...... 40 5.2.9 Dr Matthew Aylott, Communication Officer ...... 40 6 Annex ...... 42 6.1 Staff CVs ...... 42 6.2 Tender Document (Document 2) ...... 60 6.3 Declarations and Undertakings (Documents 5 & 7) ...... 66
Page 4 of 70 2 Executive summary
DECC recognises that biomass technologies are an essential component of the renewable technology mix required to help the UK meet its ambitious low-carbon objectives for 2020 and 2050. Equally, DECC recognises that biomass is complex, in that it can be used to deliver renewable power, heat or fuels, and that „biomass‟ represents a multitude of different feedstocks and technologies for exploitation. The technology available is also developing rapidly, as bio and thermo-chemical approaches are proven at scale, increasing the potential for competition for use in generation of either power, heat or fuels, while the available sustainable resource base is finite.
As a result, associated financial incentives are relatively complex in nature, to cover the range of technologies adequately and to account for both existing and developing technical possibilities. Similarly, there is potential for conflicting policy actions, striving to deliver against different objectives.
DECC is looking for 150 days of technical support and assistance to help address such issues over the next year.
The NNFCC has been working exclusively in the bioeconomy sector for 10 years and has developed an intimate understanding of the sector, particularly in bioenergy. It also has active and wide-ranging government, government agency, industry and trade association links across the sector. The NNFCC offers a project team with a broad skill set, commensurate with the need to address the many facets of work involved in the bioenergy sector.
The NNFCC has a 10 year track record of working with and delivering to Government in the bioenergy sector. This input is both highly regarded and respected and has been delivered to the demanding time schedules of busy government departments.
NNFCC has built working relationships with DECC that guarantees confidentiality and confidence in working with sensitive issues between the two parties.
In undertaking its work in the bioeconomy, NNFCC has developed an unrivalled set of data resources and tools to assist its work and provide the rapid responses required by Government.
Page 5 of 70 NNFCC has provided a wide range of techno-economic analysis, market analysis and policy support advice to DECC which has contributed to;
revision of proposed RO bands for advanced conversion technologies shaping of DECC‟s bioenergy strategy identification of barriers affecting bioenergy deployment quantification of current and future biomass deployment potential supporting government responses to industry consultations, Identifying the sustainability characteristics of different biomass supply chains and their potential to meet proposed future GHG emissions limits for power generation.
In providing this support, NNFCC has also reviewed and challenged data and analysis provided by other technical providers, delivering rigorous „proofing‟ of its outputs and recommendations.
All of these services were delivered against a backdrop of developing policy and revision of incentive schemes. The year ahead poses similar challenges as the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change seeks to introduce Electricity Market Reform legislation, including associated „Contracts for Difference‟. Similarly, DECC are working to agree mechanisms and approaches to ensure compliance with sustainability requirements for solid biomass and biogas in power and heat applications, as well as develop tariff levels for the potential domestic RHI. DECC‟s renewables roadmap and bioenergy strategy will also require updating to track progress with biomass development and potential.
These areas will require an understanding of the role for biomass and the technologies involved, their performance characteristics and costs, current and proposed feedstock sourcing policies and the working of biomass supply chains. These are all areas where NNFCC has abundantly demonstrated that it has the experience and skills to provide the information that DECC needs.
NNFCC would be pleased to continue to put its skills and expertise at DECC‟s service.
Based on an estimated split of staff technical skill bands required to deliver the service and the associated day rates (see Document 5) NNFCC tenders a price of for delivery of 150 days of support.
Page 6 of 70 2.1 Contact details
Please address any correspondence or queries on this tender to:
David Turley Policy and Strategy Manager NNFCC Biocentre York Science Park Innovation Way York YO10 5DG
Tel: 01904-435182 E-mail: [email protected]
2.2 Registered company details
The National Non-Food Crops Centre (NNFCC) is a "not for profit" company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales,
Registered office: Biocentre, York Science Park, Heslington, York, YO10 5DG.
Incorporation Number: 4853659
VAT Registration No: 828 6945 77
This office address is the normal place of work for all staff.
Page 7 of 70 3 Meeting the specification 3.1 Background
Analysis for the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)1 shows that biomass energy technologies are an essential component of the UK renewable technology mix. They can help the UK to meet its ambitious low- carbon objectives for both 2020 and 2050, to deliver ambitious GHG emissions reduction targets2 at an affordable cost. Biomass can also provide reliable base load power in contrast to other renewable forms of power generation.
Based on current projections the Department estimates that renewable electricity will contribute just over half the total generation required by 2020, estimated to equate to 125.2 TWh. Bioenergy, including that derived from waste feedstocks, will be an important contributor to achieving these aims and objectives.
Biomass can also deliver into the heat sector and is also unique in providing energetic molecules for use in today‟s vehicle fleet helping to deliver against the objectives and targets set by the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) and therefore the wider targets for delivery of renewable energy deployment to meet the targets set in the EU Renewable Energy Directive.
Furthermore, in comparison to other renewable technologies, biomass is complex, characterised by multiple influential factors. It represents a wide range of feedstock resources, from municipal wastes to virgin crop feedstocks, a range of materials from solids to gases, delivering to a range of energy sectors, including heat, power and transport fuels via a wide range of technologies, from combustion to advanced conversion technologies (ACTs).
The graphic below is a simplification of a complex matrix of opportunities and potential pathways for biomass, demonstrating that there is an extensive matrix of options for the provision of energy.
Some of the more advanced technologies, such as thermochemical conversion of biomass (gasification) have an advantage in the potential to produce a wide-range of outputs from the same industrial plant, including heat and power to transport fuels and chemical feedstock materials (Figure 2), all of which will have a value in the developing bioeconomy.
1 DECC 2050 pathways analysis 2 34% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 v 1990 emissions
Page 8 of 70
Figure 1: Examples of the range of biomass feedstocks, transformational & conversion processes and potential end uses of biomass
This highlights that the valuable attribute of biomass as a low-carbon energy source or feedstock cuts across a wide range of policy areas. Changes in policy in one area can therefore result in unintended consequences in another, potentially resulting in shifts of resource to the output providing the greatest reward. Given that biomass represents a finite resource there are bound to be conflicts to resolve to ensure best use of the available resource.
Policies and associated incentive schemes also have to be able to deal with the wide range of scales of exploitation from small scale domestic to large scale power generation, as well as taking account of the wide-ranging variability in the costs of different technologies. The latter reflects that some technologies are still developing and represent „first of a kind‟ technology, providing benefits in terms of greater energy efficiency and utility etc., that DECC wishes to stimulate. In some cases DECC requires support to gain an understanding of the level of incentives required to bring-forward such developments (or at least to avoid disincentivising them) and at later stages may be looking to where such support can be reduced.
Page 9 of 70
Figure 2: Demonstration of the potential opportunities available for exploitation of biomass through thermochemical gasification
Policy in the waste sector has an increasingly important impact on DECC‟s renewable energy objectives as the amount of energy generated from waste is increasing. However, the waste hierarchy until recently dissuaded consideration of such options in favour of composting (classed as recycling), but this has now been revised. However, work is still required to incentivise energy generation from high biomass wastes (and thereby increase waste recycling rates) by identification of suitable methods to actively measure the bioenergy content of mixed waste streams.
The rising cost of land fill and European Directives to reduce the amount of biogenic waste entering landfill is helping to stimulate development of Anaerobic Digestion (AD). Both Defra and DECC have a joint strategy to deliver an increase in AD deployment.
Exploitation of virgin biomass is also not without its problems. There is considerable debate about the carbon credentials of different biomass sources and supply chains and the impacts of biomass use on related sectors and land use. The sustainability requirements of the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) mean that it is essential that biomass technologies provide
Page 10 of 70 meaningful public goods in terms of GHG savings while land of high-carbon status or biodiversity value is protected from exploitation. There is considerable on-going debate about the indirect land use change (iLUC) impacts caused by bioenergy production, and how this should be accounted for in the sustainability assessments of biomass. The EU itself is still struggling with these issues and policy is in a state of evolution in this area as a result.
All of the above creates a complex web of feedstock, technology, policy and regulatory interactions that can result in unintended consequences if policies are not well formulated or „proofed‟ prior to introduction.
Following the principles of Better Policy Making and undertaking thorough Impact Assessment to reduce the risks of such problems, means that DECC is required to undertake a significant amount of consultation and technical analysis in its policy development work.
The complexity of biomass technologies and the different levels of technical development in each sector also creates uncertainty regarding how quickly some technical developments will come forward. Again this needs careful management to encourage first developers, while being careful to protect bill payers from excessive levies on energy bills as technology costs tumble as deployment increases. Additional deployment risks such as environmental impact and feedstock competition affecting traditional uses of wood and crops, as well as public acceptability all need to be considered during policy development and revision, to ensure maximum gain with minimal consequential impact. However, responding to such concerns, and resulting policy changes and review causes uncertainty, affecting investor confidence.
Government policy intentions can also be stifled by the immaturity of biomass supply chains. The scale of demands on biomass by co-firing and biomass conversion plants mean that much of the feedstock required to meet DECC‟s objectives for the sector is going to be imported, as there is insufficient low- cost production in the UK. However, the potential for rapid scale-up in co- firing operations, which require only relatively limited modification means that, without investment, current port and rail infrastructure are likely to impose a significant constraint on development plans in the short to medium term.
NNFCC recognises that DECC is increasingly under pressure as funding to central government is squeezed. At the same time the bioenergy sector
Page 11 of 70 represents an important and rapidly developing sector of government policy that is under intense scrutiny and pressure.
The key supporting policies are also entering a period of change with the move towards a Feed in Tariff with Contracts for Difference (FIT CfD) to support renewable power development, with the first contracts planned for 2014. This represents a whole new scheme to finance low carbon power generation. Concerns over future policy certainty (and therefore reward) is commonly cited as an issue affecting investor confidence.
Biomass used for power generation will also have to meet sustainability criteria from October 2013; similar proposals are in development for biomass heating. The Official Solid and Gaseous Biomass Carbon Calculator was launched in October 2011 to support operators determining the GHG emissions associated with the cultivation, processing, transportation and use of their biomass fuels.
There are a raft of other integrating and overlapping policy and regulatory issues that have to be dealt with to ensure the rapid and smooth progress of consultation and progress to implementation of policy.
In order to deliver bioenergy at a significant scale, DECC needs to ensure that it has the right policy framework in place to develop a thriving sustainable bioenergy industry. Policy development must be built on a strong evidence base and detailed value for money assessment, in terms of emissions reductions and impacts on wider Government priorities such as food security and waste management.
Other potential impacts, both positive and negative ranging from local (e.g. job creation and air quality) to national (e.g. increased energy security) to global (e.g. land use rights and potential iLUC) also need to be considered in developing this framework of policies and regulation. It also requires a strong grasp of the latest information from industry stakeholders, other Government departments, international stakeholders, related industries and the wider market –to manage the financial risk to incentive schemes by having an understanding of deployment potential and current or likely future barriers.
NNFCC has long-term experience of working with the sector to assist DECC in navigating through the above issues and liaising with a range of stakeholders to help ensure policy is robust and adequately „proofed‟ before public scrutiny. DECC needs an independent, impartial advisor who knows the relevant sectors intimately, knows how government policy teams work and
Page 12 of 70 who is also intimately connected to industry views and opinions and the key factors affecting bioenergy project development. NNFCC has shown over nearly a decade of delivery to Defra and latterly DECC that it serves this purpose extremely well, delivering very efficiently, to a high quality and as such is highly regarded.
3.2 Outline of requirements
Supply to DECC‟s Office of Renewable Energy Deployment (ORED) of up to 150 days of high quality bioenergy technical, research and advisory service support from date of contract agreement up to and including 31 March 2014.
The majority of this work will take the form of specific pieces of work agreed between the Department and the supplier, some of which may be of a more ad hoc nature and be required at short notice.
The services will cover areas such as bioenergy technical expertise, bioenergy and supply chain development, market intelligence, how best to support and enhance the deployment of bioenergy in line with Government policies and assistance to overcome specific challenges to the implementation of Departmental policies.
In securing such support DECC is looking for assistance to ensure;
It has the right policy framework in place, and that; This is built on a strong evidence base of likely impacts (e.g. on emissions reductions, food security, and related effects in other sectors such as on waste management practices) That it is very well informed of the likely speed and scale of bioenergy project developments to manage financial risk to incentive schemes to ensure they remain within agreed spending limits/envelopes. That its interventions are in alignment with wider strategic intentions for biomass in helping to deliver a low carbon economy.
3.3 Approaches to delivery 3.3.1 The NNFCC
NNFCC was established as the National Non-Food Crops Centre in 2003 by Defra‟s then Secretary of State. It was established in response to market failure of the commercialisation of non-food crops and associated
Page 13 of 70 exploitation technologies, due to lack of awareness of the opportunities available.
NNFCC‟s objective was to stimulate bio-based industries and supply chains by addressing the barriers to development. The emphasis of NNFCC‟s work has moved significantly over time towards supporting and promoting the development of biomass for energetic applications as markets have opened up.
NNFCC has moved beyond its early foundations. Building on its expertise in the bio-based energy and materials sectors, the NNFCC has developed into a consultancy business, providing strategic analysis and market advice to government departments, government agencies, industry and other commercial interests. However, this has been achieved without diminishing NNFCC‟s special relationship with DECC as a trusted provider of independent advice and information.
With its distinctive perspective and the wide-ranging expertise of its staff, the NNFCC has developed a key role in providing market support and advice to those looking to identify and understand the opportunities within the developing bioenergy sector.
3.3.2 Skills and experience
. Currently twelve people are directly employed by NNFCC, with skills and expertise in agronomy, sustainability, biology, chemistry, physics, engineering and energy policy.
This breadth of skills combined with an unrivalled depth of knowledge and expertise of the biomass industry puts NNFCC in a unique position to deliver the services required under this service agreement.
NNFCC has a long history of providing direct support and advice to central Government, initially Defra from 2003 and latterly DECC (since its formation) to specifically deliver the Energy and Climate Change agenda.
Support and advice has been provided across three key areas: market analysis, techno-economics, and policies and incentives.
3.3.3 Market analysis
In daily contact with industry and through active participation in bioenergy- focussed technical forums of government, government bodies, science
Page 14 of 70 councils and renewable energy trade associations, NNFCC has developed an unrivalled knowledge of the current and potential future market situation relating to bioenergy feedstocks and technologies.
NNFCC currently holds an extensive database of all known bioenergy projects, with a breadth and depth of detail that surpasses that available in official databases, such as the Renewable Energy Planning Database (REPD). Intelligence on each facility includes the following:
NNFCC monitors the project pipeline, conversion rates and common barriers and hurdles. In undertaking these activities, it is possible to extract key intelligence on deployment potential and undertake analysis on future projections, by technology, date or region, and to identify potential issues, such as feedstock competition, land bank availability, logistics or infrastructure issues that may restrict or influence uptake.
NNFCC is able to use this intelligence, combined with wider bioeconomy expertise and an extensive network of industry contacts to provide insight and analysis into the medium to longer term role for bioenergy technologies, particularly in relation to low carbon electricity generation.
NNFCC is also regularly involved in one-to-one discussions with biomass project developers to understand the issues and risks affecting investment appetite for different types of investors.
To further aid developers and key stakeholders, NNFCC produces monthly market reports on bioenergy, biofuel and feedstock markets; providing news on sector developments, industry comment, policy development and feedstock prices and trends. In future these will also cover carbon, ROC and RTFO price trends.
Page 15 of 70 Some relevant recent project examples are summarised below:
3.3.3.1 Bioenergy deployment analysis
NNFCC collates information on an on-going basis for its national database of biomass power, ACT and AD developments; including information on feedstock demands, wider benefits, completion date and status of development. For the past three years relevant data has been extracted on a monthly and more latterly quarterly basis and presented to DECC in the form of graphical analysis with expert commentary and justification.
Analysis included future projections for technology deployment, feedstock demand, investment, job creation and energy contribution. This analysis was used directly by DECC‟s policy and economics teams to provide a better understanding of barriers and likely uptake and to enable internal modelling of policy change impacts, assessment of wider benefits, likely costs of incentives and success rates, by date, technology, scale of development and region.
3.3.3.2 Barriers matrix
Through direct stakeholder engagement and active participation in expert industry working groups; NNFCC collates industry intelligence on bioenergy project progress and current barriers – tracking supply chain development and the bioenergy project pipeline. In recent years barriers to uptake have been reported in a matrix to DECC on a monthly and more latterly a quarterly basis, ranking their severity and proposing possible mitigating actions required by both Government and industry. Barriers were categorised as technical, economic, policy, regulatory, infrastructure, or skills/awareness related. Used by many DECC staff, this matrix was published alongside DECC‟s Bioenergy Strategy.
3.3.3.3 Bioenergy infrastructure analysis
In March 2013, NNFCC completed a detailed temporal and geographical analysis of bioenergy developer intentions, to establish feedstock demand projections and sourcing out to 2020. Associated impacts on supply chain logistics were assessed against existing and planned infrastructure developments, gained through direct engagement with the relevant parties from port operators, to rail carriers, and biomass processors to end users.
Page 16 of 70 This demonstrated that significant investment, which was subsequently quantified, is required to avert supply bottlenecks that could otherwise hinder achievement of DECC‟s objectives for biomass deployment. A final report was submitted to DECC which included analysis, commentary and conclusions highlighting likely bottlenecks, resultant impacts and potential mitigating actions.
3.3.3.4 Bioenergy Strategy
NNFCC supported the drafting of DECC‟s Bioenergy Strategy (2012) and prepared two supplementary evidence-based reports that were published alongside the strategy; UK Jobs in the Bioenergy Sectors by 2020, and Domestic Energy Crops Potential and Constraints Review. Both reports were produced in a very short turnaround time.
3.3.4 Techno-economic assessment
NNFCCs team of consultants are led by a team of technology-focused Sector Heads, providing expertise in each of the following four areas:
Biomass and Biogas Biofuels and Bioenergy Biomaterials for Energy and Industry Biorefining
NNFCC engages with interests in the biofuel sector as well as those in the bioenergy sector, recognising that there is considerable potential for overlap in technology for delivery as more advanced thermochemical processes are commercialised. As a result there is potential for tension between different sectors and expected policy outcomes when these rely on the same feedstocks.
NNFCC also supports commercial clients and project developers through their early-stage decision process; guiding on policy, regulation, economics, feedstock and technology choice and compatibility. NNFCCs role in such activities is to identify technical and economic risks, develop mitigation plans with the client and to strengthen business plans. Through such work, NNFCC is directly involved in bioenergy technical evaluation and due diligence. Increasingly NNFCC is also involved directly with developers looking to establish bioenergy and AD projects, including Advanced Conversion Technologies. As a result, NNFCC is at the cutting edge of issues such as;
Page 17 of 70 technology evaluation securing sources of feedstocks and dealing with any associated legislation (e.g. waste handling regulations and requirements) sustainability credentials of proposed feedstock supply chains site identification and selection – including infrastructure, logistics and planning issues feedstock and technology compatibility analysis techno-economic analysis of intended supply chains and critical appraisal of proposed business models
In its work, NNFCC regularly obtains economic intelligence on costs and returns from developers, as well as detail on technology and feedstock efficiencies and operational limitations. This intelligence can be used to appraise and guide the Department and other clients on assumptions for the development and capabilities of various bioenergy technologies, both from a technical and economic perspective.
Through its regular interaction with researchers, NNFCC also gains insight into the status of current science and technology developments in the bioenergy and biotechnology sector that will have a significant influence in the mid to long-term delivery of a low-carbon and energy efficient economy.
The unique combination of the above factors combine to provide the NNFCC it with an unparalleled understanding of the “state of the nation” in all bioenergy technologies both in terms of current and developing technologies, current and future „readiness‟ for deployment, feedstock sourcing plans and the infrastructure demands of the sector.
Some relevant project examples are summarised below:
3.3.4.1 Consultation on re-introduction of gross CV for definition of ACT‟s
NNFCC was approached by DECC in November 2012 to assist with a review and technical sense-check of responses to the mini consultation from John Hayes MP on proposals to implement a minimum syngas gross calorific value to qualify as an Advanced Conversion Technology (ACT). This change was needed to differentiate between the more innovative advanced conversion technologies and the more conventional combustion and incineration, particularly where staged combustion is used.
NNFCC provided an independent assessment of the points made and alternative proposals tabled, identifying workable solutions.
Page 18 of 70 3.3.4.2 Official Solid and Gaseous Biomass Carbon Calculator
In 2011 NNFCC were contracted by DECC as technical adviser to oversee the scoping, development and launch of the Official Solid and Gaseous Biomass Carbon Calculator, working with Ofgem and E4Tech. The tool was launched in September 2011 and NNFCC has since continued to relay operational feedback to DECC on behalf of industry and to support industry in its use.
As a key contributor to the tools development, NNFCC have a deep understanding of the rationale behind its creation and its functionality, the default values and source data, issues during its development and subsequent use, and glitches in its functionality. NNFCC has developed internal fixes for the glitches and advised industry clients of these fixes, to enable more efficient use and more accurate data output and analysis.
3.3.4.3 Biomass CCS
NNFCC undertook a recent techno-economic review for DECC, into key barriers to development of Biomass CCS and the viability of policy amendments that could help mitigate some of these barriers.
The review identified the lack of any clear incentive that would encourage development of CCS with dedicated biomass, though this is identified as a critical future technology in DECC‟s own 2050 pathways analysis.
A concise report was submitted to DECC in March 2013 detailing the findings and summarising the analysis.
3.3.4.4 Farm-scale AD plant efficiency
In September 2010, NNFCC were tasked by DECC to undertake a techno- economic analysis on farm-scale AD plant efficiency.
This project sought to determine how much, if any, energy crop is required to ensure that on-farm AD plants using slurry or manure as the primary feedstock are able to operate cost-effectively.
The objectives of this project were;
To determine the amount and type of „energy crop‟ required to ensure on-farm AD plants using slurry as the primary feedstock operate efficiently and cost-effectively.
Page 19 of 70 To determine the energy crop production system that would be required, the area involved and the cost of production associated with such systems.
A techno-economic model was developed to deliver the objectives. A complex model was delivered to DECC to enable further internal economic modelling, to confirm assumptions made in the incentives and to more accurately consider likely hurdle rates.
3.3.4.5 Review of finance barriers
In 2012/13, NNFCC monitored and tracked key finance barriers affecting different biomass technologies. The project identified the different types of investor active in the sector and their preferred areas/modes of investment activity. NNFCC also followed five development projects across the year, as case studies, representing AD, dedicated biomass, ACT, coal conversion and auto-generators seeking to convert to biomass.
A summary of the key issues affecting project finance completion was produced.
3.3.4.6 Value of upgrading waste to WDF for fuelling ACT‟s
DECC has a policy to encourage development of ACT‟s but wasn‟t sure whether the cost (environmental and financial) of producing the refined fuels required for ACT systems negated the benefits delivered.
NNFCC undertook a review of the GHG impacts of pre-treating wastes, (accounting for credits for associated recovered recyclates), plus the economics of pre-processing and use of ACT‟s versus the use of mass burn technologies. Mass and energy balances along with capital and operating costs were derived from a mix of internal and external sources.
NNFCC‟s analysis showed an environmental benefit from use of ACT‟s, but that the superior financial strength of mass burn technologies was reliant on large scale operation and high gate fees, the latter being anticipated to fall in future.
3.3.5 Policies and incentives
NNFCC are viewed by the industry as leading policy and regulatory experts in the bioenergy sector and NNFCC have recently been involved in the development, implementation and review of most UK renewable energy
Page 20 of 70 policies (incl. heat, power and transport fuels), specifically providing advice, guidance and analysis for;
Feed-in-Tariff (FIT) – development, launch, impact assessment and subsequent reviews Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) – biogas and biomethane technology and cost assumptions, development and impact assessment modelling Renewables Obligation (RO) – technology and cost assumptions, banding review, definitions, implementation, future reviews Electricity Market Reform (EMR) and Contracts for Difference (CfD) – banding, definitions, cost modelling and contract lengths Waste Framework Directive (WFD) – impacts of implementation, recommendations, advice on required clarity of definitions and classification
Over the past 24 – 36 months, NNFCC has worked with staff in the majority of DECCs incentives teams and have provided direct advice, data, analysis and opinion in the form of reports, briefings, email or verbal responses, often at very short notice with a very rapid turnaround time.
As policy experts, NNFCC also guide and support industry through the range and complexity of policy options, enabling critical appraisal and comparison of options (i.e. FITs vs. RO), and selecting preferred options based on specific business objectives and project details.
NNFCC also uses its broad and detailed policy knowledge to support industry and Government in understanding the impact of any proposed changes to existing renewable energy policies or any new policies (e.g. the new Energy Bill) on deployment potential or individual business models.
Through a combination of policy, market and technical expertise, NNFCC are in a strong position to provide an unrivalled breadth and depth of knowledge to the UK bioenergy industry. Sharing European and International experience and lessons learned elsewhere, combined with an extensive knowledge of European policies and Directives, NNFCC can provide early insight and support into; policy development; policy reviews; analysis of reasons for success and failure or areas of strength and weakness. NNFCC‟s breadth of expertise means that it can provide these services across the breadth of biomass use in heat, power and transport applications.
NNFCC also has experience working with other Government Departments, such as Defra, DfT and BIS, and non-Government organisations, such as
Page 21 of 70 WRAP, Forestry Commission and LowCVP, on policy development and implementation. All members of the NNFCC team have developed extensive contacts in relevant related organisations and Departments (see later).
NNFCC has been regularly used to review developing DECC policy positions and for example made significant contributions to DECC‟s Bioenergy Strategy (2012).
Some relevant project examples are summarised below:
3.3.5.1 RO banding review (released Oct 2011)
Following industry concerns on banding review proposals on EfW with CHP for 2013-17, NNFCC reviewed previous evidence supplied to DECC on costs of Advanced Conversion Technologies utilising MSW feedstocks. Critical analysis proved returns to be too optimistic and lacking in real-world detail. A scoping exercise was used to glean financial data from several developers, data was compared and rationalised to provide generic data suited for use by DECC Economists. The outcome was adoption of a 2-ROC band rate that helped projects such as the Air Products development in Teeside to progress, which was previously in jeopardy. This data will feed into calculation of the new FIT-CFD rates to replace ROC‟s for new plants, potentially from 2014.
NNFCC has continued to provide regular high-level support to DECC in helping to address concerns over the potential for „gaming‟ by EfW developers trying to claim the ROC rates for „advanced‟ ACT‟s.
3.3.5.2 Review of energy crops definition, RO Banding Review
As part of the RO Banding Review, NNFCC provided an analysis of industry responses to proposals to amend the energy crop definition, identifying those that had merit and those which should be ignored, supplying technical and economic evidence and analysis in support of these conclusions. NNFCC then provided a revised definition for use by DECC and Ofgem which was adopted in Ofgem‟s guidance to industry.
NNFCC demonstrated through this activity its ability to objectively and critically appraise data and technical commentary provided by stakeholders in order to develop clear conclusions and guidance for Government. NNFCC handled responses, data and insight in strictest confidence and provided a concise, detailed technical report back to DECC in a very short timeframe.
Page 22 of 70 3.3.5.3 Ad-hoc renewable financial incentives support
During the past 24 – 36 months, NNFCC have provided structured and ad- hoc technical and economic support to DECCs ORED and renewable incentive teams. Requests for support have occasionally been formal requests for critical review and analysis of industry submissions, market data and policy proposals, but more often ad-hoc short notice requests for rapid responses and opinion-based input.
NNFCC have undertaken analysis and provided insight to support development, implementation and review of renewable energy incentives, using subjective and often confidential data, holding highly confidential discussions with industry and building trust to ensure sufficient data is provided to enable accurate and wide-reaching analysis.
3.3.5.4 RO sustainability standards
Following the RO Banding Review Consultation in 2012, NNFCC were tasked by DECC to provide technical support for the development of a GHG trajectory (in terms of CO2/MWh) for biomass electricity, to assist DECC in compiling its consultation response. The aim of this project was to:
Evaluate the range of life cycle GHG emissions for current feedstocks used in the UK, Assess the potential for future improvements in GHG savings, and Analyse the possible impacts on industry if more stringent standards are introduced.
NNFCC successfully delivered the project in March 2013. The summary report presented GHG emissions ranges for a number of priority biomass supply chains in 2012, comparing the default biomass supply chains modelled in the UK Solid and Gaseous Biomass Carbon Calculator (BCC) with data provided by industry stakeholders, and estimated the potential GHG emissions reductions which may be achieved in 2020 and 2030.
3.3.5.5 AD Strategy & Action Plan
In June 2011 Defra and DECC published a joint AD Strategy and Action Plan which listed 56 actions required to accelerate deployment and strengthen the success of the UK‟s AD industry. NNFCC led the „Improving our Knowledge and Understanding‟ workstream and subsequently sit on the Delivery Steering Committee, Chaired by Defra.
Page 23 of 70 NNFCC was also involved in delivering a number of the 56 actions; most notably through the development, maintenance and upkeep of the Official AD Information Portal (www.biogas-info.co.uk) on behalf of Defra.
NNFCC also works to reduce the barriers to AD, for example by helping to build understanding of the role of crops in AD systems (an area of concern to Defra). In support of this, NNFCC has assisted in the development of industry- led Best Practice Guidelines for Use of Crops in AD.
NNFCC has also worked in a number of forums to address end of waste issues to ensure digestate from AD can be returned to land wherever feasible and desirable.
3.4 Resources to aid delivery 3.4.1 NNFCC links to others
On a daily basis, NNFCC works with a wide range of stakeholders and other bodies with a specific interest in the bioenergy or wider bioeconomy, enabling NNFCC to quickly gather opinion and views to help shape its responses to DECC information needs. NNFCC‟s own contact database runs to 3700 contact details.
Through such interactions, NNFCC gains insight into developing industry thinking and concerns and is directly involved in bioenergy market analysis, technical evaluation and due diligence. This experience and information gained from such work is invaluable in ensuring NNFCC‟s work with government is clearly focussed and routed in real-world experience.
Examples of NNFCC‟s regular cross government and wider contacts include;
DECC ORED:
Biomass and biomass deployment and infrastructure (Elizabeth McDonnell), AD deployment and energy from waste issues (Catherine Halter), biomass sustainability and Biomass and Biogas Carbon Calculator (Caroline Season) Regular contact at least weekly with ORED
Other DECC teams:
Renewable Heat Incentive Teams (Iain Mathieson, Andrej Miller, Patrick Allcorn) - NNFCC provides support on Biomethane issues
Page 24 of 70 Strategy and Innovation Team - support on Biomass TINA‟s and the Bioenergy Strategy (Bryony Butland) International Energy and Energy Security Team (Kate Dowen)- support on issues around exemption from gas transport regulations
Defra links:
Nick Blakely, Resource and Sustainable Consumption Evidence Programme - liaison for NNFCC work on biogenic energy content of mixed waste streams James Cooper, Head of Energy from Waste Policy - NNFCC participates in cross-government energy from waste evidence liaison group Waste Framework Directive – NNFCC are a member of Defra‟s Waste Hierarchy Evidence Review Panel NNFCC currently provides the Programme Facilitation for the Renewable Raw Materials LINK programme Richard Parsons – NNFCC contributed to the development of the AD Strategy and Action plan and are responsible for delivery of a number of actions. NNFCC also maintains the AD Portal
DfT:
NNFCC participates in regular high level iLUC discussions with DfT (Sarah Sheridan) NNFCC has previously provided DfT (Annabel Kelly)with a road map for development of Advanced Thermochemical Biofuels
DCLG:
NNFCC provides oversight of a DCLG-sponsored project monitoring energy use in the Renewable Construction Demonstration Programme
Page 25 of 70 BIS:
Technology Strategy Board – NNFCC serves on several project appraisal boards
Other Government-sponsored bodies:
OFGEM – Provision of support on gas sampling and syngas CV‟s in gasification plants in support of development of FMS procedures (Pharoah Le Feuvre). Also advice on definitions for what constitutes an „energy crop‟ WRAP – NNFCC is currently working with WRAP funding to examine the feasibility for development of a Biogas network. NNFCC also works alongside WRAP in delivery of Defra‟s AD Strategy. NNFCC also serves on project appraisal panels for WRAP-funding calls Biomass Energy Centre/Forest Research/Forestry Commission. NNFCC holds regular update meetings with representatives (at least quarterly)
Other influential bodies:
Energy Technology Institute – NNFCC serves on ETI‟s Project Board and Specialist Advisory Group for Biomass. NNFCC is also a lead advisor in an ETI-sponsored project to establish ETI‟s planned biomass gasification demonstration plant Home-Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA) (Harley Stoddart). NNFCC is in regular contact with HGCA‟s non-food crop lead, providing strategic advice and analysis on the biofuels sector and issues around sustainability criteria Industrial Biotechnology Initiative (IBTI) – NNFCC co-ordinates IBTI‟s industrial engagement club (on behalf of Research Councils UK) AfOR (Now merged with the REA) (Association for Organics Recycling) NNFCC has worked alongside AFOR to develop a compostable products and packaging guide for events (as an Olympic Legacy action) EU INTERREG – NNFCC is working on an INTERREG project to ascertain the market potential for algal technologies IEA – NNFCC has participated in several bioenergy work-themes including Task 42; Biorefining NFU – NNFCC has regular discussions with the NFU over agricultural issues affecting the bioenergy sector CEN WG209 – NNFCC served on this committee developing methods for bio-based measurement
Page 26 of 70 Trade Associations:
REA – NNFCC serves on several interest groups including, Biogas Group, Renewable Heat Group, Renewable Power Group, Bioenergy Group, Renewable Transport Fuel Group, Sustainability Implementation Group, Pyrolysis and Gasification Group UK Woodfuel Suppliers Group and UK Pellet Council – NNFCC has regular interaction with these groups.
3.4.1.1 Commercial interactions
In addition to the above, NNFCC has provided strategic and technical advice to an extensive range of companies looking to understand the opportunities presented by the bioenergy sector. In 2012/13 alone, NNFCC provided advice to help bring forward bioenergy projects totalling 39.5 MW in
Page 27 of 70 potential capacity
3.4.2 NNFCC information sources
In its work over 10 years, NNFCC has collated an unrivalled and significant volume of data resources, reports and contacts in the bioenergy sector, that can be drawn on to support DECC.
As already mentioned, NNFCC has built up its own power, CHP and AD project databases, detailing planned capacities, project status and planned deployment dates, and other information that goes well beyond the data available in the National Planning Database.
Page 28 of 70 Combined with NNFCC‟s extensive range of contacts in the industry across the whole supply chain, in both the UK and overseas, this provides the NNFCC with extensive readily-available sources of data and stakeholders with which to immediately address questions posed by DECC.
3.5 Matching DECC‟s requirement
In relation to the areas listed in the tender document where technical advice may be required by DECC, the preceding sections amply demonstrate that;
NNFCC has a broad understanding of the financial incentives for bio power and heat and that it has already been demonstrably involved in ensuring the available incentives are capable of leveraging the intended deployment and that these are not otherwise acting as a barrier to deployment NNFCC has an intimate knowledge of current bioenergy technology deployment patterns and rates of development (as well as an understanding of the issues affecting the number of projects coming forward) which enables it to provide information on likely medium and long-term development prospects for various technologies and well as monitor how effectively change in individual sectors is being driven by available incentives. NNFCC has a detailed understanding of the biomass heat sector, gained through its work on small scale heating though to work on biomethane injection NNFCC has significant experience in working with biomass sustainability standards, including significant experience working with DECC‟s Biomass and Biogas Carbon Calculator From its varied work NNFCC has a detailed knowledge of biomass supply chains built on feedstocks ranging from waste to forestry by- products to virgin biomass NNFCC has significant experience in providing market analysis in the bioenergy sector, including deriving data direct from industry and estimating its impacts on job creation, as well as identifying investment requirements (e.g. in its infrastructure analysis work) NNFCC has experience dealing with issues such as the waste hierarchy, end of waste designation and value of waste treatment for efw outlets, providing the expertise to advise on waste-related issues. NNFCC‟s experience in providing support for the current financial incentives means it is well placed to address the future challenges and
Page 29 of 70 issues for biomass likely to arise through the introduction of the new Energy Bill.
3.6 Ensuring timely delivery
NNFCC is immediately aware of relevant data availability and where further effort will be required to source material, or establish a process for its collection and collation. NNFCC can therefore quickly inform DECC of the speed with which evidence and information requirements can be met.
NNFCC has a reputation for on-time and rapid delivery of high quality technical advice and analysis, NNFCC is experienced in responding to such requests and in managing workloads to accommodate.
Recent examples include;
These issues demonstrate both how NNFCC can quickly respond to a wide variety of requests from DECC as well as the sensitivity of the issues dealt with
Page 30 of 70 by NNFCC and the confidence that DECC can have in the confidentiality of its dealings with NNFCC.
NNFCC is able to maintain these high levels of efficiency because of;
NNFCC staff commonly work together to address specific information needs, which ensures that knowledge is shared and exchanged.
NNFCC is also able to ensure the quality and reliability of its responses and the data that these rely upon though its quality assurance procedures (see below).
3.7 Quality assurance
The quality of NNFCC‟s outputs and smooth project delivery will be assured by NNFCC‟s established project management and quality assurance procedures.
3.7.1 Project management
David Turley, will be appointed as NNFCC‟s Contract Manager, responsible for coordinating all high-level contractual and delivery aspects of the project with DECC and its nominated Contract Manager.
This includes responsibility for
Page 31 of 70
These meetings will involve the NNFCC Contract Manager and other project leads from NNFCC as appropriate. To reduce costs to DECC, NNFCC will also make use of other opportunities for NNFCC project leads to discuss issues with appropriate DECC staff to ensure the smooth delivery of projects.
NNFCC also has access to Skype, teleconferencing and video conferencing equipment on site if required, to help increase the level of interaction, while reducing costs to DECC.
3.7.1.1 Agreeing
3.7.1.2 Ensuring
Page 32 of 70 3.7.2 Oversight and peer review
3.8 Confidentiality and security of data
NNFCC recognises that there is great sensitivity associated with the development of policy work with £ millions of industry investment dependent on the outcomes of political decision making.
The NNFCC has an exemplary record in its dealings with government departments and in protecting the interests of Government. In protecting these interests, where necessary,
Page 33 of 70
3.9 Types of output
The types of work called off will determine the most appropriate types of response. For most short, ad-hoc responses this will be verbally or by e-mail. Responses could also be by short document or spreadsheet. Larger projects will be reported using NNFCC‟s in-house report formats. Where appropriate, and where this aids interpretation or data absorption, graphic or PowerPoint presentations of outputs can be provided.
NNFCC is also happy to support DECC staff in meetings with Ministers or stakeholders or to present results and findings to stakeholders as appropriate.
NNFCC will also proactively provide ad-hoc feedback to DECC on key themes of significance encountered from daily interaction with industry to provide DECC with an early warning (RED Alerts) on issues that are developing.
Page 34 of 70 4 Costs and charging arrangements
Page 35 of 70
Page 36 of 70 5 Experience of the staff to deliver on DECC‟s aims and objectives 5.1 The project team
The NNFCC offers a broad skill set, commensurate with the need to address the many facets of work involved in the bioenergy sector. NNFCC‟s staff complement includes basic expertise in agronomy and crop production, sustainability, biology, chemistry, chemical engineering, physics and energy policy. All of these basic science foundations, gained at degree or higher level, underpin a wider set of knowledge and skill sets embedded in the staff complement which provides the NNFCC team with the knowledge and expertise to deliver a wide range of services in the bioenergy sector including:
Advice on biomass feedstock production and sourcing Environmental impact assessments Biomass supply chain sustainability analysis and assessment Advice on biological and thermochemical conversion of biomass feedstocks Bioenergy technology evaluation and due diligence Techno-economic evaluation and analysis Policy and regulatory analysis and strategic impact analysis Feasibility assessment Future market potential analysis Risk assessment and analysis
The proposed NNFCC project team offers DECC informed, independent and well-focussed advice through a combination of
high-end technical and scientific expertise in the bioenergy sector built over a number of years; close relationships with the wide range of interests in the bioenergy sector; a strong independent stance that enables industry to liaise confidently with NNFCC staff over sensitive issues; a common commitment to help deliver the low carbon agenda.
Page 37 of 70 5.2 Individual staff skill areas
Brief biographies for each member of the delivery team are provided below outlining what they specifically provide in terms of knowledge and experience in support of DECC‟s aims and objectives in the bioenergy sector.
Further detail on the skills and previous experience of each of the team members is provided in individual CV‟s at Annex 1, demonstrating the breadth and depth of each individual‟s experience, in terms of education and previous work experience, as well as the wider recognition of their expertise through the committees and organisations on which they serve.
5.2.1 David Turley, Policy & Strategy Manager
Over 2 decades of experience working with; o Government (including ORED and its forerunners) and government policy in the bioenergy and non-food crop sector o Bioenergy feedstocks o Bioenergy resource assessments o Environmental impact assessments o Developing, monitoring and analysing sustainable production systems o Cropping systems o Analysis of bioenergy deployment potential o Critical analysis and review Highly experienced project manager Strong research and analytical background Strong publications record Strong record of delivery for UK and International clients
5.2.2 Lucy Hopwood, Head of Biomass and Biogas
A decade of experience working on bioenergy and non-food crops with expertise in; o crop and forestry production o management systems o feedstock logistics o biomass feedstock and AD costings o Factors affecting sustainability of supply chains o Development and use of GHG calculators Nationally recognised expertise in AD and biogas technologies Experienced project manager
Page 38 of 70 5.2.3 Dr Geraint Evans, Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy
Recognised lead source of expertise in advanced conversion technologies, especially thermochemical processing of biomass Chemical engineering expertise in energy and fuel technologies and conversion to power, syngas and liquid fuels Expertise in combustion technologies Experienced in delivery of market and techno-economic analysis to DECC Extensive experience of technical and evidence delivery to DECC
5.2.4 Dr John Williams, Head of Materials for Energy and Industry
Expertise in fate and behaviour of materials in different end of life options Experienced in the issues associated with determining the bio-based and bioenergy content of materials and development of standards to define biogenic carbon content and „biobased‟ Experience in working with development of guidelines for dealing with compliance with the waste framework directive Expertise of the interactions between the materials sector and opportunities for renewable energy generation Experienced in working with investors and funders
5.2.5 Dr Adrian Higson, Head of Biorefining
Expertise in biotechnology routes of biomass exploitation and added value routes of exploitation Expertise in the integrated production of energy and other outputs though biorefinery approaches, and their current industry status Experienced in life cycle analysis and interpretation Experience in sustainability issues affecting feedstocks and associated sustainability assurance schemes
5.2.6 Fiona McDermott, Senior Consultant
Expertise on biomass feedstocks, fuels and technologies including o biomass policies o biomass processing o biomass sustainability o potential for job creation
Page 39 of 70 Expertise in opportunities for use of bioliquids in the heat and power sector Works with the heat and power industry, associated trade associations and bioenergy supply chain actors on an almost daily basis Experience in techno-economic evaluations, market and strategic development analysis reporting Strong understanding of the operation of the wood-fuel market and the opportunities for woody biomass Experienced in one-to-one interviews with industry and stakeholder engagement to gather information resources
5.2.7 Lucy Nattrass, Senior Consultant
Experienced in provision of bioenergy and biofuel policy and market advice Understands the constraints and environmental impacts of biomass supply chains. Experienced in analysis of the GHG impacts of different bioenergy supply chains Experienced in delivery of techno-economic evaluations of bioenergy processes Understands the policy framework supporting development of the bioeconomy Experienced in one-to-one interviews with industry and stakeholder engagement to gather information resources Experienced in deployment monitoring activities
5.2.8 Michael Goldsworthy, Consultant
High-level expertise in biotechnology and its use for advanced biofuel production Experience in bioenergy market research Experienced in one-to-one interviews with industry and stakeholder engagement to gather information resources Experienced in information gathering to provide deployment intelligence Experience in biomass sustainability criteria
5.2.9 Dr Matthew Aylott, Communication Officer
Expertise in perennial biomass crops and spatial modelling of the perennial biomass resource
Page 40 of 70 Wide ranging knowledge of the markets in the bioenergy sector through production of regular market updates for all sectors of interest to NNFCC High levels of experience and expertise in writing for trade media and journals as well as other stakeholder audiences Expertise in web-based communication and social media. Manages NNFCC‟s hosted web sites including the AD portal
Page 41 of 70 6 Annex 6.1 Staff CVs David Turley
Policy and Strategy Manager
KEY ATTRIBUTES Over 20 year‟s experience with International, Energy, Agricultural, and Environmental Policy Departments and associated Government Agencies dealing with bioenergy and feedstock issues Wide-ranging expertise in EU and UK bioenergy, GHG emissions control and sustainability policies affecting the renewables sector. Applied biologist with wide-ranging analytical and research experience working at the interface between policy and the practical delivery of policy objectives. Understands all the opportunities available for exploitation of biomass. Expertise in sustainable production systems, biomass resource assessments and assessment of market opportunities and risks.
Has spent over 2 decades working in research, review and analysis in the bioenergy and non-food crop sectors, working for national and international bodies, including provision of technical support to the former UK Biomass Task Force. Provides strategic analysis of biomass resource demands, costs and environmental impacts, built on a strong practical understanding of cropping systems and crop management. This extends to an understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling impacts in production cycles and Life Cycle Analysis. This builds on a strong understanding of UK and EU policies for renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Has contributed significantly to previous published government non-food crop and bioenergy strategies. David has worked for most of his career in close collaboration with UK Government departments, providing Government officials and its Ministers with strategic advice and analysis in the bioenergy sector. He is well recognised and sought by research bodies and other institutions looking for such analysis and expertise.
EDUCATION BSc (Hons) Applied Biology, Liverpool Polytechnic, 1984
MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Association of Applied Biology: Trustee, Committee Member and Convenor of the Crops and the Environment Committee. Membership of the Energy Institute BASIS Qualified Agronomist
COMMITTEE WORK UKERC global biomass resource estimate project: Member of expert stakeholder panel. Energy Technologies Institute: Occasional Member of Bioenergy Specialist Advisory Group. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI): Chair of Expert European Committee on Use of Food Crops for Non-Food Uses. DfT: Member of former Advisory Expert Committee for Biofuels Research Programme. Editor for scientific journals, including, Industrial Crops and Products, Environmental Science and Technology, BioResources Journal and Soil Use and Management. Served on research proposal review panels for Defra‟s Non-Food Crop Supply Chain Assessment and Development programme and for NERC‟s Carbon Management and Renewable Energy Programme.
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
Mar 2006 – Dec 2009: Head of Agri-environment and Rural Strategy Group, Food and Environment Agency (FERA), Sand Hutton, York
June 2002 – March 2006: Senior Scientific and Commercial Officer, Agricultural and Rural Strategy Team, Central Science Laboratory (now FERA) Senior Scientist and Head of the Agricultural and Rural Strategy Team responsible for: Technical and policy advice on non-food biomass and biotech crops and development of plant biorefineries to UK Government Policy Divisions, OECD and ILSI, agricultural Levy Bodies such as the HGCA and British Potato Council as well as commercial interests. Project and lead report author for a wide range of EU and UK funded contract research, research reviews and strategic policy analysis in the non- food crop sector, including biomass to energy applications, Responsible for delivery of a wide range of speaking roles at conferences and seminars.
1990 – June 2002: Research Consultant, ADAS High Mowthorpe, North Yorkshire Co-ordinated and managed a wide-range of multi-site research and development projects on crops for food and non-food uses. Development and assessment of sustainable crop production systems.
PUBLICATIONS Published over 70 reviews, articles and project reports in the bioenergy, biofuel and crop feedstock production sectors.
Page 43 of 70 Lucy Hopwood
Head of Biomass and Biogas
KEY ATTRIBUTES Farming background, with practical experience in agriculture, agronomy and nutrition. Good understanding of feedstock from farming, forestry and waste management activities. Strong technical expertise in bioenergy technologies, in particular combustion and digestion
Lucy leads NNFCCs activities on biomass and biogas; managing a team responsible for providing strategic advice, planning and technical support on sourcing or providing feedstocks, adding value, or installing and operating technologies. Lucy and her team's objectives are to de-risk decisions and to provide technical support to policy makers to help shape the future policy landscape. Lucy has been involved in biomass and biogas for the past 10 years and she is widely recognized as an impartial expert in her field; she actively participates in leading industry networks and sits on a number of steering committees, including the AD Strategy & Action Plan Delivery Committee. Her strengths include feedstock production, sustainability, policy and regulation. Lucy comes from a farming background bringing practical experience with a strong and current understanding of the industry. She obtained a degree in Crop Management from Harper Adams in 2002 and has advised on agronomy and crop production in her current and previous positions. Lucy is a member of the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and won their Young Consultant of the Year Award in 2012 for her work on biomass and biogas.
EDUCATION BSc (Hons) Agriculture and Crop Management, Harper Adams University College, 2002
MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Member of BIAC (British Institute of Agricultural Consultants)
COMMITTEE WORK Member of REA Biogas Group Steering Committee Member for Cockle Park AD Plant, University of Newcastle and Reaseheath College AD Plant, Cheshire Working Group lead for Defra AD Strategy „Improving our Knowledge and Understanding‟ and Delivery Committee member Chair of Official AD Portal (www.biogas-info.co.uk) Steering Group
Page 44 of 70 PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
2002 – 2004: Scientific Officer in the Agricultural & Rural Strategy Group, CSL Worked on scoping studies, policy and market analysis of non-food crops, products and technologies. Examples of the work involved include a review of non-food crop potential for the European Parliament; co-ordination of the IENICA Plant Database; profiling over 120 non-food crops and their potential; and scoping studies for Wales, Gwynedd and Cornwall on non-food crop potential.
2000 – 2001: Research & Development Assistant, Advanta Seeds. Hands-on plant breeding in the non-cereal crops research team.
PUBLICATIONS Lead author and contributor to a significant number of technical and strategic reports for public- and private-sector clients on biogas, biomass, feedstock supply and sustainability.
Page 45 of 70 Dr Geraint Evans
Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy
KEY ATTRIBUTES Recognised leader in biorenewables and, in particular, Advanced Conversion Technologies Chemical Engineer; specialist in energy and fuel technology, particularly focussed on solid fuels and their conversion into electricity, gaseous fuels and liquid fuels. Wide experience across the range of primary fuels (coal, biomass, oil) and energy conversion technologies (combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, liquefaction) Demonstrated ability to understand new processes; solve problems; provide market intelligence; and provide valued evidence.
Geraint‟s primary focus for the NNFCC is in the area of thermochemical processing. He has a particular interest in advanced conversion technologies. He has built up a unique database of UK ACT projects and a picture of potential future deployment levels. This database has been instrumental in supporting the development of the recent RO banding review and is now being used to support the EMR. Geraint is working with Royal Dahlman to design and build a first of a kind IGCC power station which will be the most efficient of its kind built or proposed to date for the UK. Geraint‟s wide experience across the range of primary fuels and conversion technologies brings strength in depth to the advice and support provided; it enables Geraint to understand and value: Synergies, conflicts and sectoral drivers The range of uses for biomass Impacts of bioenergy and risks
Geraint engages widely within the bioenergy industry through participation in industry stakeholder groups (for example, the REA‟s Pyrolysis and Gasification group); by speaking at conferences and in webinairs and by leveraging his existing range of contacts. He also guest lectures to University students and professional bodies on the value of bioenergy. His strong reputation as a bioenergy leader enables him to call on a range of contacts to gather industry comment to tight timescales.
EDUCATION PhD. Chemical Engineering Aston University (Biomass Gasification). 1992 BEng. (Hons) Fuel and Energy Engineering. Leeds University. 1986
Page 46 of 70 MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Institution of Chemical Engineers Energy Institute
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Chartered Engineer 1995
COMMITTEE WORK Renewable Energy Association Pyrolysis and Gasification group Renewable Energy Association Road Transport Fuels Group LowCVP Road Transport Fuels Group DFT RTFO Unit Expert Advisory Group ETI Bioenergy Strategic Advisory Group EPSRC Algal Bioenergy Program Executive Board Grassohol Scientific Advisory Group
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE 1999-2006: Coke Production and Quality Coordinator, ConocoPhillips Humber Refinery, Immingham. Responsible for designing refinery operations to manufacture different grades of petroleum coke for use in the aluminium and steel industries and for managing coke quality to meet customers‟ requirements.
1997-1998: Process Design Engineer, GSA Scunthorpe. Based at BP Chemicals, Hull and ConocoPhillips Humber Refinery. Responsible tor designing plant modifications.
1995-1997: Site Process Engineer, Baker-Petrolite, Liverpool. Based at ConocoPhillips Humber Refinery. Responsible tor technical aspects arising from Baker-Petrolite‟s contract at the Humber Refinery for the supply of additives (e.g. for refinery corrosion control)
1992-1995: Research Chemical Process Engineer, British Coal Direct Liquefaction Project at Point of Ayr. Responsible for 2.5 tpd coal pilot plant for the conversion of coal into mid distillates. Chemical Engineer responsible for hydrocracking and coking plant areas.
1991-1992: Postdoctoral Research Project, University of Aston. A world-wide survey of gasification and pyrolysis projects. 1986-1988: Fuel Technologist for British Coal South Wales. Responsible for building and supporting the market for use of coal for heat and power in the industrial sector (e.g. schools, Local Authorities, hospitals, industry).
Page 47 of 70 Dr John Williams
Head of Materials
KEY ATTRIBUTES Polymer Chemist and materials expert Recognised expert in bio-based plastics Experience in identifying market opportunities and technical gaps in polymers and materials from non-fossil carbon Understanding of fate and behaviour of materials in different end of life options, including AD. Leader in linking to investment platforms and identifying and translating IP and opportunities bio-based technology
John is responsible for bio-derived polymers, composites and fibres including renewable construction materials. Primarily focussing in identifying, developing and helping to commercialise opportunities in the materials markets. A recognised expert in closing the loop on the end of life fate and potential for bio-based renewable materials, including their relevance to the Waste Framework Directive and the potential for exploitation in renewable energy generation. This also entails the measurement of bio-based carbon and translation of its importance to the whole of supply chain, as well as advising policy makers and standardisation bodies. John‟s understanding of the complex interaction of the increasing global production of bio-based materials, particularly plastics, will have a marked effect on waste arising in the future. The advantageous nature of such materials with high caloric value but no carbon penalty may significantly affect the development of the market and the subsequent policy objectives in future years. John is in regular contact with all of the major manufacturers and developers of bio-based materials and has many cross-cutting areas of contact with the brand owners, retailers and waste management companies. These contacts together with the interaction with the investment platforms provide an unrivalled connection between materials and end of life potential.
EDUCATION PhD Polymer Chemistry, University of Leeds, 1994 BSc (Hons) Chemistry, University of Bradford, 1984
MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Institute of Directors Royal Society of Chemistry
Page 48 of 70 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS CSci: Charted Scientist CChem: Chartered Chemist
COMMITTEE WORK UK representative on the CEN Working Group 209: Definition and measurement of Bio-based content as mandated by the EU Commission, leading to CEN TC411 now in operation looking at horizontal standards for all bio-based products Member of the CEN Working Group 17: Bioplastics BSI MI/2: Bio-based content UK mirror group to CEN TC411 Materials committee for London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games 2012 BPF Bioplastics group: Chair of Bio-based plastics group Member of the Steering Group for Bioplastics: Assessing their environmental effects, barriers & opportunities. Project for Defra. September 2010. Member of the Project Steering Group for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Oxo-degradable Plastics across their Life Cycle. Report for Defra. April 2010. Member of the steering group for Qualitative Review of Biodegradability of Biodegradable Food Waste Bags. Project for WRAP. February 2010.
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
2000 – 2005: Director ATP Ltd. An SME specialising in the development of adhesives & surface coatings
1998 – 2000: European Technical Manager KlebChemie. A German adhesive manufacturer specialising in polyurethanes, polyesters and polyamides
1989 – 1998: Technical Manager Mydrin (Bostik) Global major in the production of adhesives and thermoplastics
1985 – 1989: Development Chemist Henkel GmBH World‟s largest manufacturer of speciality oleochemicals and natural adhesives
Page 49 of 70 Dr Adrian Higson
Head of Biorefining
KEY ATTRIBUTES Expert on International Bioeconomy developments. Bio-based supply chain sustainability assessment. Qualified Round Table on Sustainable Biofuels Auditor. Experienced Organic Chemist. 6 years‟ experience in supporting the development of the bioeconomy in the UK and Internationally. 6 years technical and managerial experience in working with SMEs and multinationals in contract chemical manufacture.
Adrian is the NNFCC lead in the areas of bio-based chemicals, biorefining and biorefinery development.
Adrian has been involved in the strategic planning of regional programmes to support the development of a UK bioeconomy. His expert knowledge of emerging markets in the bioeconomy and how these markets are being supported globally has enabled successful programmes to be developed in the North East of England, Yorkshire and in Wales. Adrian is currently working with „Innovation Norway‟ to grow the bioeconomy and the use of Industrial Biotechnology in Norway.
Adrian has worked with a range of clients assessing sustainability aspects of biomass to fuel and chemical supply chains. Adrian has a strong understanding of Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) methods and the implications of different analysis procedures. In addition to quantitative LCA, qualitative social and environmental sustainability factors are also assessed. Adrian is a Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB) qualified auditor and is working with companies using the RSB criteria to develop sustainable project. The RSB considers 12 separate criteria for sustainable biofuel production including poverty and food security considerations.
Adrian has extensive links with the UK research base through his role as the Industrial Coordinator for the BBSRC‟s Integrated Biorefining Technologies Initiative (IBTI) and the as the Programme Facilitator the Defra‟s Renewable Materials LINK programme. Adrian is supporting the development of BBSRC Networks in Bioenergy and Industrial Biotechnology.
EDUCATION PhD Organic Chemistry, University of Liverpool, 1994 BSc. (Hons) Chemistry and Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, 1991
Page 50 of 70 MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Royal Society of Chemistry
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Chartered Chemist
COMMITTEE WORK Industrial Biotechnology Leadership Forum, Industry Task Force member (current). Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies at the University of Bath Strategic Advisory Board member (current). BEACON Biorefinery Centre, Advisory Board member (current). UK representative in the IEA Task 42 group on Biorefineries (March 2010 - December 2011) UK representative on the Ad Hoc advisory group to the EU Commission Lead Market Initiative for Bio-based products (January 2010 - December 2011). Member of the BIS Industrial Biotechnology Innovation and Growth Team (Technology and Manufacturing Group, February 2008 – March 2009)
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
Oct 2004 - Sep 2006: Project Manager, SAFC Pharma. Overall „cradle to grave‟ project management of the contract production of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Responsible for client management and the co-ordination of contract chemical synthesis across global manufacturing sites. May 2001 – Oct 2004: Chemistry Team Leader, SAFC Pharma (formerly Ultrafine Chemicals). The technical delivery and coordination of contract chemical synthesis projects. Line management responsibility for a team of 12 research and development chemists.
Jan 2000 - May 2001: Chemist, Ultrafine Chemicals Ltd.
Feb 1997 - Dec 1999: Research Fellow, University of Dundee.
Jan 1995 - Jan 1997: Research Associate, University of Colorado at Boulder
PUBLICATIONS Lead and co-author on numerous Biorefining reports focussed on regional development within the UK, strategic development of University research programmes and review reports on the development of global biorefining initiatives
Page 51 of 70 Lucy Nattrass
Senior Consultant
KEY ATTRIBUTES Experienced consultant and project manager with expertise in bioenergy, biofuels, biomass supply chains and waste resources Understands the theory and application of life cycle assessment Manages stakeholder engagement activities
Lucy provides market and policy analysis in the bioenergy, biofuels and bio- based materials sectors. She demonstrates a broad understanding of the competing markets for biomass, including the constraints to and environmental impact of increasing biomass resources. She has applied knowledge of environmental impact assessment and life cycle assessment through a MRes in Clean Chemical Technology, and to the evaluation of GHG emissions and biomass resource models, most recently for DECC‟s Science and Innovation Team. Lucy has experience of using DECC‟s Biomass and Biogas Carbon Calculator and supporting other users. Lucy works with DECC, Defra and DfT delivering technology evaluations and economics assessments to inform strategy and policy development. In doing so Lucy utilises her technical knowledge of AD, biomass gasification, and advanced conversion technologies for waste, analytical skills, and understanding of relevant UK and European policies, including overlapping policies such as those surrounding energy from waste. Lucy has a network of contacts across the bioenergy, biofuels and bio-based materials sectors, including relevant agencies and trade associations such as WRAP, REA and CIWM. She has demonstrable experience of managing stakeholder engagement activities including managing the UK Renewable Packaging Group, whose membership includes material manufacturers, consumer products manufacturers, retailers and the waste industry. Lucy communicates regulatory updates to the Group and delivers a seminar programme throughout the year. Through regular stakeholder communication Lucy reports on the barriers to bioenergy deployment and supply chain development and maintains NNFCC‟s bioenergy projects database.
EDUCATION MRes with Distinction, Clean Chemical Technology, University of York, 2007 BSc (Hons), Chemistry, University of Sheffield, 2005
MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL BODIES Member of the Energy Institute
COMMITTEE WORK
Page 52 of 70 Waste Hierarchy Evidence Review Panel
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE February 2006 – July 2006: Analytical Chemist, ALcontrol Laboratories, Rotherham, West Yorkshire
PUBLICATIONS Lead author on several reports on biofuels and sustainability for Government and commercial clients. Contributing author for The Utilisation of Food Co- Products (unpublished).
Page 53 of 70 Fiona McDermott
Senior Consultant
SUMMARY In-depth knowledge of UK biomass markets, supply chains and market constraints Technical expertise surrounding design and operation of biomass plant, including emissions impacts. Up to date knowledge of current policy and drivers for bioenergy. Appreciation of project development routes for energy plant (power and heat).
Fiona provides expertise on biomass feedstocks, fuels and technologies alongside market knowledge and an understanding of the positive impacts of such developments, such as the potential for job creation. She works to assemble and analyse information on bioenergy supply chains and develop understanding as to what barriers need to be removed to facilitate production of biomass feedstocks. She interacts with key players in both the heat and power industries, associated trade associations and bioenergy supply chain actors on an almost daily basis. Fiona works with government and industry to understand and support both policy and projects under development. This includes preparing techno- economic evaluations, market and strategic development reports for a range of clients including large power generators, commercial interests, government departments and academia. She also establishes and manages joint projects with other stakeholders such as the Biomass Energy Centre, Forestry Commission and Forest Research. Expertise gained through past work with stakeholders in the forestry and woodfuel sectors provides Fiona with a strong understanding of the operation of the woodfuel market and the opportunity for woody biomass feedstocks to contribute to the targets for renewable energy generation. Fiona regularly engages with key stakeholders in the biomass feedstock sectors to glean market knowledge surrounding the current status of biomass supply operations in the UK.
EDUCATION BSc (hons) Physics 2:1, University of York, 2008
COMMITTEE WORK North East Biomass Forum Confor UK Woodfuel Suppliers Group REA Renewable Power & Bioenergy Group
Page 54 of 70 REA Biomass Heat Group North West Forest Forum
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
July 2008 - January 2010 – Project Manager, Future Energy Yorkshire, Leeds, UK. Responsible for the management and delivery of a number of regional projects to support the development of the woodfuel sector in Yorkshire and Humber. Developed systems and business processes for a grant stream to support woodfuel supply chain improvements and delivered this grant programme on behalf of Future Energy Yorkshire (now CO2Sense). Worked with a range of stakeholders including fuel suppliers, technology providers and other support organisations to encourage and facilitate uptake of biomass heating at small to medium scale.
PUBLICATIONS Lead author on several reports on large scale biomass power generation, associated supply chains and sustainability.
Page 55 of 70 Dr Michael Goldsworthy
Consultant
KEY ATTRIBUTES Microbiologist with expertise in molecular biology, biotechnology and analytical chemistry Experience in the planning, coordination and delivery of „wet‟ and „dry‟ research projects Has 4 years research experience in the production of drop-in biofuels by microorganisms and a developed knowledge and understanding of genetic modification and strain development Prior experience working with large multinational companies, including Royal Dutch Shell and Glaxo Smith Kline
Michael conducts market research and feasibility assessments in sectors across the bioeconomy, accounting for the techno-economic and geopolitical impacts on supply and demand. He regularly engages with project developers and other industry stakeholders to provide deployment intelligence and gain appreciation of the industry view of fiscal support structures. Having recently completed a PhD researching bacterial hydrocarbon biosynthesis in collaboration with Royal Dutch Shell, Michael has an understanding of the technical barriers currently limiting deployment of advanced biotechnological synthesis and conversion technologies in the biofuels industry and a broad knowledge of potential market developments in this sector. Additionally, with a background in biology, Michael also has a good understanding of ecosystem preservation and carbon cycling and has developed a broad knowledge of sustainability requirements imposed on the bioenergy sector. This stands him in good stead for understanding the complications of addressing controversial sustainability issues such as indirect land use change.
EDUCATION PhD. Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, 2011 BSc. (Hons) Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, 2007
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE Oct 2007 - Sept 2011: PhD studentship, University of Exeter, UK. PhD focused upon providing a reassessment of hydrocarbon biosynthesis in several bacterial strains to establish their potential for deployment as industrial biocatalysts in the manufacture of advanced biofuels. Funding for the project was provided by Royal Dutch Shell, whose research teams Michael worked with closely throughout the investigation. Results were used to develop an
Page 56 of 70 understanding of a novel hydrocarbon biosynthesis pathway within sulphate- reducing bacteria. These findings were regarded as potentially important for the future development of Shell‟s commercial strategy in regards to advanced biofuels.
PUBLICATIONS Experience of lead authorship on peer reviewed academic papers and reports delivered to industrial partners and DECC. This includes reports on bioenergy sustainability criteria and fuel measurement and sampling technologies.
Page 57 of 70 Dr Matthew Aylott
Science Writer
KEY ATTRIBUTES Successful academic background in modelling bioenergy supply chains and greenhouse gas emissions Delivered research reports on bioenergy and carbon capture and storage for the Department of Energy and Climate Change Proven track record writing in trade publications and academic journals
Matthew is the Science Writer for NNFCC. He is responsible for providing commentary and analysis on the policies shaping the bioeconomy. He also contributes towards the research objectives of the company by writing reports, briefings and factsheets for public and private clients. Matthew completed a PhD at the University of Southampton in 2010, which assessed the role of energy crops in meeting the UK‟s renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions targets. Since joining NNFCC he has authored a number of government-funded research reports for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, on topics such as carbon capture and storage and the role of biomass in contributing towards UK renewable energy targets, which was published alongside the Bioenergy Strategy. As NNFCC's Science Writer, Matthew delivers clear and timely media campaigns which have made a real difference to people's understanding of complex issues like land use change, the role of biomass in electricity production and next generation energy from waste processes. He is experienced in print and online journalism, and his work has been published in award-winning magazines, such as the Ecologist, BusinessGreen and Chemistry World; leading the discussion on a broad range of topical subjects relating to energy from waste and bioenergy. Matthew also prepares biomass market reports for NNFCC‟s members and other regular mailings. Matthew manages NNFCC‟s contact database numbering 3700 individuals and regularly issues press releases to NNFCC‟s media contacts database of more than hundred journalists working in the bioenergy sector. Matthew is also the lead for updating and maintaining NNFCC‟s website (www.nnfcc.co.uk) and ensuring a flow of interest towards NNFCCs and its clients interests. In addition, Matthew manages a number of subsidiary web- sites hosted by the NNFCC including the government‟s official information portal for anaerobic digestion (www.biogas-info.co.uk). Matthew is responsible for ensuring the content remains relevant and up to date, this includes publishing regular news stories and in-depth analysis to engage with the target audience and build page views.
Page 58 of 70 EDUCATION PhD. Plant Biology, Uni. of Southampton, 2010 MSc (Hons) with Distinction. Environmental Informatics, Uni. Of Leicester, 2006 BSc (Hons), 2:1. Environmental Science, Uni. of Reading, 2005
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE 2009-2010: Researcher for UK Energy Research Centre. Exploring the spatial availability and greenhouse gas emissions from UK grown bioenergy crops. 2006-2010: PhD with University of Southampton, Forest Research and the University of Aberdeen. Modelling the Climate Change Impacts on the Productivity of Short Rotation Coppice Energy Crops.
PUBLICATIONS Experienced author, with several refereed publications on biomass yield modelling, biomass constraints, LCA methodologies and GHG emissions from biomass production. Regular contributor of articles to trade magazines.
Page 59 of 70
6.2 Tender Document (Document 2)
Document 2
Commissioning Specification
Invitation to submit a proposal for the provision of Bioenergy Support
1. Summary of Requirement
1.1 The requirement is for the provision of up to 150 days of high quality bioenergy technical, research and advisory services to be provided during the period from the date of contract award to 31 March 2014 to the Office of Renewable Energy Deployment (ORED) in the Department of Energy and Climate Change.
1.2 It is expected that the majority of the services provided will take the form of specific pieces of work which will be agreed between the Department and the supplier, although some of the services may be more ad hoc and required at short notice.
1.3 Consortia bids are welcome. The consortium will need to set out how it will ensure all requirements will be managed and met, including quality assurance and the prompt handling of requests. A lead person must be nominated who will have authority to act on the consortia’s behalf and will be held responsible for meeting the conditions of the contract.
2. Scope
2.1 The contract is for the provision of high quality technical, research and advisory services across the width and breadth of the bioenergy industry, including supply chain development and market intelligence, during the period from the date of contract award to 31 March 2014.
2.2 The technical, research and advisory services will cover areas such as bioenergy technical expertise, bioenergy and supply chain development, market intelligence, how best to support and enhance the deployment of bioenergy in line with Government policies and overcome specific challenges to the implementation of Departmental policies.
Page 60 of 70
Document 2
3. Background
3.1 The Department of Energy and Climate Change is responsible for securing low carbon electricity and heat to 2020. Alongside gas and low-carbon transport fuels, nuclear power and carbon capture and storage, renewable energy brings energy security, decarbonisation of our economy and green growth.
3.2 Based on current projections the Department estimates that renewable electricity will generate just over half the total generation required at 125.2 TWh or 56%. Bioenergy, including the biomass portion of waste, will be an important contributor to achieving these aims and objectives.
3.3 Bioenergy is one of the most complex renewable technologies, characterised by multiple influential factors which we need to understand. Currently bioenergy advice is provided to the Department by the National Non Food Crops Centre (NNNFC). This arrangement with the NNNFC will cease at the end of March 2013.Thereafter, the Department is seeking through this procurement to contract with a supplier to provide up to 150 days of high quality bioenergy technical research and advice to the Department up to the 31st of March 2014 on a strictly ad hoc basis. The Department will only pay for work that is actually commissioned and delivered by the supplier. The value of the contract is expected to be between £60,000-100,000, but nothing in this ITT should be read as guaranteeing that a particular type or level of work will be commissioned during this period.
3.4 In order to deliver bioenergy at a significant scale, the Department needs to ensure that it has the right policy framework in place to develop a thriving sustainable bioenergy industry. Policy development must be built on a strong evidence base and detailed value for money assessment, in terms of emissions reductions and impacts on wider Government priorities such as food security and waste management. It also requires a strong grasp of the latest information from industry and the wider market – most importantly to manage the financial risk to incentive schemes by having a closer understanding of deployment. This has a direct bearing on the Department’s ability to increase deployment in UK investment and jobs in the bioenergy sector and importantly, ensuring that the investment fits with its strategic intentions for biomass.
3.5 Bioenergy is one of the most complex renewable technologies, characterised by multiple influential factors which we need to understand, including: A range of feedstocks (virgin materials, by-products, co-products, wastes) all of which are finite and have associated GHG lifecycle emission from their cultivation, processing and transport; A range of technologies, including those with an innovation opportunity such as Advanced Conversion Technologies (ACTs); A range of uses, both for all three energy sectors – electricity, heat and transport, and other uses with issues of competition for finite feedstocks (within energy use and other industries);
Page 61 of 70
Document 2
Overlapping policy regimes and regulations: energy, waste, water, agriculture and other policies overlap in this sector, and regulation of the last three represent an unintended barrier to bioenergy development, particularly energy from waste; Potential impacts both positive and negative ranging from local (e.g. job creation and air quality) to national (e.g. increased UK energy security) to global (e.g. land use rights and potential indirect land use change); Deployment risks: in terms of environmental impacts, the consequences (e.g. emissions and costs) of competition with traditional uses of wood, and public acceptability; and Stakeholders: including industry, other government departments and agencies, international stakeholders, developers, related industries, NGOs whose views vary, not only from each other but depending on the technology and feedstock under consideration. 3.6 The interplay of these factors make bioenergy a challenging area to develop, regulate and incentivise effectively.
3.7 The contractor will need to demonstrate it has the breadth of expertise and experience necessary in these areas.
Page 62 of 70
Document 2
4. The Requirement
4.1 To provide up to 150 days of ad hoc bioenergy technical, research and advisory services in relation to implementation of DECC policies. Areas where technical advice may be required are outlined below:
the Government’s financial incentives relating to bioenergy for heat and electricity;
impact of any proposed changes to financial incentives relating to bioenergy for heat and electricity;
medium to longer term role for bioenergy technologies, particularly in relation to low carbon electricity generation;
the Department’s assumptions for the development and capabilities of various bioenergy technologies, both technical and economic;
technical and economic matters relating to biomass technologies supported under the Renewable Heat Incentive;
bioenergy related technical standards, such as biomass sustainability;
market intelligence relating to supply chain development and pipeline development;
market intelligence to enable the Department to determine the likely impact of policy on small scale bioenergy projects including economic factors such as jobs and investment, and to monitor success rates and identify barriers to deployment;
specific technical issues, in particular those relating to waste technologies;
any bioenergy matters relating to the new Energy bill; and
support for users of DECC’s Biomass and Biogas Carbon Calculator3
3 http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Sustainability/Environment/RenewablObl/FuelledStations/bbcc/Pages/bbcc.aspx )
Page 63 of 70
Document 2
4.2 To provide bioenergy technical, research and advisory services in accordance with the contractor’s quality arrangements, or as otherwise agreed with the Department, to the timescales and costs agreed with the Department.
4.3 To provide bioenergy technical, research and advisory services in the format agreed with the Department. Such formats are expected to include written reports, data sheets, verbal responses to specific questions, presentations through display boards or PowerPoint, and email.
4.4 If required, to present information to external stakeholders.
4.5 To keep the Department informed of instances where significant information has been obtained or significant issues have arisen that should not wait for regular reporting methods.
5 Management Information
5.1 The contractor will report to the Department’s Contract Manager. The Department will appoint a project manager for each project agreed with the contractor who will act as the Department’s primary point of contact for the delivery of the services required. Similarly the contractor will be required to appoint a project manager for delivering the services.
5.2 The contractor will arrange quarterly meetings to discuss progress of overall contract, individual work areas and to demonstrate how it is meeting its obligations. These will be held in Whitehall Place London, and will involve contract and project managers and contract leads. Items to be discussed will include progress of agreed work areas, monitoring of quality assurance, performance management, costs against contract, updates to contract, issues, changes to personal etc.
5.3 Timing and content of reports for individual projects will be agreed as part initiation of new work.
5.4 Provision of management information will be finalised as part of shortlist discussions.
Page 64 of 70
Document 2
6 Security of Data
6.1 The contractor will submit a security plan explaining how it will ensure that departmental and personal data is protected.
7. Constraints
7.1 None.
8 Contract/service management Requirements
8.1 The contractor is expected to meet normal contract management requirements. These requirements will be set out in the contract and will cover supply of management information, management of contract, management of individual work projects called off under the contract.
9. Consortia bids
9.1 Consortia bids are welcome. The consortium will need to set out clearly how it meets the requirements of this contract and how it will be managed. A lead person must be nominated who has authority to act on behalf of the consortia.
Page 65 of 70 6.3 Declarations and Undertakings (Documents 5 & 7)
Document 5
COMMERICAL MODEL AND PRICING SCHEDULE
As requested in the invitation to tender , below are the names, grades and roles of the personnel who will be employed to provide the services together with hourly and day rates.
Name Grade Role Hourly Day Rate Rate David Turley Senior Manager
Lucy Senior Hopwood Manager
Dr Geraint Senior Evans Manager
Dr John Senior Williams Manager
Dr Adrian Senior Higson Manager
Fiona Senior McDermott Consultant
Lucy Nattrass Senior Consultant
Michael Consultant Goldsworthy
Dr Matthew Consultant Aylott
Page 67 of 70
Document 7
DECLARATIONS - Statement of non-collusion
To The Department of Energy and Climate Change
1. We recognise that the essence of competitive tendering is that the Department will receive a bona fide competitive tender from all persons tendering. We therefore certify that this is a bona fide tender and that we have not fixed or adjusted the amount of the tender or our rates and prices included therein by or in accordance with any agreement or arrangement with any other person.
2. We also certify that we have not done and undertake not to do at any time before the hour and date specified for the return of this tender any of the following acts:
(a) communicate to any person other than the Department the amount or approximate amount of our proposed tender, except where the disclosure, in confidence, of the approximate amount is necessary to obtain any insurance premium quotation required for the preparation of the tender;
(b) enter into any agreement or arrangement with any other person that he shall refrain for submitting a tender or as to the amount included in the tender;
(c) offer or pay or give or agree to pay or give any sum of money, inducement or valuable consideration directly or indirectly to any person doing or having done or causing or having caused to be done, in relation to any other actual or proposed tender for the contract any act, omission or thing of the kind described above.
3. In this certificate, the word “person” shall include any person, body or association, corporate or unincorporated; and “any agreement or arrangement” includes any such information, formal or informal, whether legally binding or not.
……………………………………………………………………………….…. Signature (duly authorised on behalf of the tenderer)
DAVID TURLEY On behalf of NNFCC
10 April 2013
Page 68 of 70
Document 7
Form of Tender:
To The Department of Energy and Climate Change
1. Having considered the invitation to tender and all accompanying documents
(including without limitation, the terms and conditions of contract and the Specification) we confirm that we are fully satisfied as to our experience and ability to deliver the goods/services in all respects in accordance with the requirements of this invitation to tender.
2. We hereby tender and undertake to provide and complete all the services required to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of contract and the Specification for the amount set out in the Pricing Schedule.
3. We agree that any insertion by us of any conditions qualifying this tender or any unauthorised alteration to any of the terms and conditions of contract made by us may result in the rejection of this tender.
4. We agree that this tender shall remain open to be accepted by the Department for a period of 3 months from the date below.
5. We understand that if we are a subsidiary (within the meaning of section 1159 of (and schedule 6 to) the Companies Act 2006) if requested by the Department we may be required to secure a Deed of Guarantee in favour of the Department from our holding company or ultimate holding company, as determined by the Department in their discretion.
6. We understand that the Department is not bound to accept the lowest or any tender it may receive.
7. We certify that this is a bona fide tender.
…………………………………………………………………………...... Signature (duly authorised on behalf of the tenderer)
DAVID TURLEY On behalf of NNFCC
10 April 2013 ………………………………………………………………………….
Page 69 of 70
NNFCC
NNFCC is a leading international consultancy with expertise on the conversion of biomass to bioenergy, biofuels and bio-based products.
NNFCC, Biocentre, Phone: +44 (0)1904 435182 York Science Park, Fax: +44 (0)1904 435345 Innovation Way, E: [email protected] Heslington, York, Web: www.nnfcc.co.uk YO10 5DG.