Bay Crossing Study Public Scoping Comments October 11, 2017 – December 15, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bay Crossing Study Public Scoping Comments October 11, 2017 – December 15, 2017 Bay Crossing Study Public Scoping Comments October 11, 2017 – December 15, 2017 DATE MEDIUM COMMENT (Personally Identifying Information Removed) I read that there is a proposed idea of a second bridge crossing to the eastern shore in southern Maryland. I'm curious if 10/12/2017 Email a ferry crossing would be a possibility seems like that would be any attraction as well as an alternative to the existing bay bridge. Just a suggestion Seriously? Another 3 years to study this again? Why not stop wasting our tax money on continuous "studies" of where 10/30/2017 Website to put a bridge! Put the money TOWARDS another crossing instead of yet another study! Only with wasting our tax money would things progress this slow. I think a new crossing should connect Calvert County to the Cambridge area.This would remove a lot of traffic from D. C. 10/30/2017 Website and Virginia on the existing bridges. I don' think a crossing of the northern bay would help much because the majority of th population lives south of it and it would make the trip longer. My two cents would be to build a new 3-lane bridge just south of the "old" bay bridge. The existing access roads/toll facilities are already in place. Then the "old" bridge can be used for one way travel at peak times or on holidays. Then possibly widen route 50 from Queenstown south to route 404. You could also look into a light rail system from 10/30/2017 Website Washington D.C. or Annapolis to Queenstown. Another possibility would be to build a new 4 or 6 lane bridge from Long Beach across the bay to Taylor's Island. Major infrastuctural improvements would have to be made on both sides of the bay to handle traffic, noise, etc. There may be extensive impact/damage to wildlife areas near Taylor's Island. This is an important study. I believe that the area that is in the approaches of a new bay crossing would see an economic boost that would help vitalize the area for future growth. This kind of project would greatly expand Maryland's economic muscle in an area that has plenty of room to profit from such a project. One such area that I 10/30/2017 Website would recommend would be Route 413 from 13 down to Crisfield then across to Smith Island and on to the Western shore. Both sides of the Bay would benefit from the project and I think the state as a whole would see tremendous business growth (Tax revenue) as a result. It would make the Eastern shore competitive with other areas of the state for business growth. 10/30/2017 Email Bay Crossing (New Bridge area for consideration) at Saint Leonardo MD to Taylor Island, MD. A bridge should be put up between Harford county and Kent county. Those further north should not have to drive 10/30/2017 Email south to glen burnie to get over to the eastern shore. As an Eastern Shore resident for the past 20 years, I have followed with interest the discussions about the need for increased capacity for vehicles crossing the Bay. I’m a visual person, and if I was also an artist, I would provide a visual attachment to highlight my position, but I’m going to have to settle for words in a message. 10/30/2017 Email I understand there are essentially three competing approaches that could achieve this increased capacity. For brevity, I will refer to them as Northern (New Crossing, Balto. Cnty to Kent Cnty): Central (Expand Capacity of existing AA Cnty to QA Cnty) and Southern (Calvert Cnty to Dorchester Cnty). The long range betterment of life in Maryland seems best Commenter names and personal information have been redacted and, in most cases, the redaction is noted. 1 Bay Crossing Study Public Scoping Comments October 11, 2017 – December 15, 2017 DATE MEDIUM COMMENT (Personally Identifying Information Removed) served by a Southern approach. • The major eastern shore destination that contributes to the current strain on capacity is Ocean City and the Delaware Beaches. • With the exception of traffic originating from Cecil County and north (PA and DE), most all western shore traffic will use the existing Rt. 50/Bay Bridge route to and from the MD/DE Beaches. That can only increase. • The Southern Approach provides an alternative route that will actually also shorten the trip for traffic originating anywhere from a line about 10 miles north of Rt 4 and the entire Washington Beltway. Not sure what % of the current Bay Bridge Beach Bound traffic originates from this MD/DC/VA region, but the key here is a shorter trip, reduced miles, reduced emissions, reduced fuel consumption etc. • On the Western Shore, the Rt. 4 corridor is ideal for upgrades to accommodate increased capacity. The Eastern Shore side (Taylor’s Island) is more challenging because of the natural state of the land and the importance of keeping Blackwater intact and undisturbed, but there are plenty of examples of highways through or around natural preserves that have extremely low impact. Actually Rt. 13 on the eastern shore side of the bridge tunnel provides a good example of such a highway. Alligator Alley in FL seems to be another example. • The opportunity for some economic development along the Rt. 4 corridor and in Dorchester County (away from the protected lands) seems a plus rather than any attempt to increase the traffic for the already taxed capacity along existing Rt. 50 & 404 in QA, Talbot, Caroline and Dorchester Counties. I look forward to the coming web presentation [Name removed] Easton, MD [Information removed] Thank you for the invitation to attend the November 15th presentation on an alternative Bay crossing. I am a resident in Owings. I am also a native Marylander. I regret I am unable to participate so I am sending a suggestion. 1. There is also a need for a new bridge from St. Mary's County into Calvert County at Solomons. Over the last few years, the traffic has significantly increased over that bridge. 10/30/2017 Email 2. My recommendation for a new Bay crossing from the Western Shore to the Eastern Shore is in the vicinity of Solomons: a. The distance between the Eastern and Western Shores in the Solomons vicinity appears to be minimal than elsewhere in the Bay. Less environmental impact and offers a southern entry to the Eastern Shore for more "southern residents/travelers." Commenter names and personal information have been redacted and, in most cases, the redaction is noted. 2 Bay Crossing Study Public Scoping Comments October 11, 2017 – December 15, 2017 DATE MEDIUM COMMENT (Personally Identifying Information Removed) b. The new bridge at Solomons could possibly be integrated into a new planned bridge from St. Mary's County to Solomons. This could also prove to be very beneficial. "Kill two birds with one stone" possibly? All the best with your planning! I highly suggest putting a crossing in Calvert county to keep southern Maryland from having to go so far north to just 10/30/2017 Email back track again south! Greetings. I believe another crossing from the Western Shore to the Eastern Shore is needed but I oppose an bridge when there 10/31/2017 Website are other bridges that need to be replaced. I support a ferry from St. Mary's or Calvert County to the Eastern Shore. I believe this is better for the commuter, local economies and the environment. Ferry service can be implim ented in just a few years while a bridge would take decades to finance and build. Plus a ferry would add a level of appeal that a bridge can't touch. Thank you. All for the new bridge design in Calvert County at the narrowest point between west and east shore. Two things to consider: 1. Consider designs that lessen stress for people who suffer from a fear of heights. The existing bay bridge are not well designed in this regard making it difficult for those with this anxiety. Obviously you will not find a design that 10/31/2017 Website will satisfy everyone, but, considering consulting with experts this area would be so foresighte and allow more people to less stressful access to the other side of the great state of MD. Suggestions include: additional space between cars and edge, secure sides to avoid the open spaces feeling like you are high up in the air. 2. In the future, link it up with a road that connects through St Mary's and a bridge to Virginia. Thanks for your time and consideration into this matter. Put the new span across from Lusby (rt 4) to Taylors Island and run the access just north of the refuge and connect to Rt 10/31/2017 Website 16 and on to Rt 50. 10/31/2017 Website I think an additional crossing is a good idea. I would like to know of the progress. We have long needed another bridge crossing for the Chesapeake Bay to relieve the pressure and overwhelming traffic 10/31/2017 Website which occurs every evening to cross the existing Chesapeake Bay Bridge. Even a ferry would help but another bridge crossing makes more sense, whether it is near Havre de Grace or ends up in Somerset County, MD. After years living on Kent island understand that no new bridge should be thought to go up there. infastucture can not handle it. Only logical place is a bridge or bridge tunnel to cross lower bay that would relieve pressure on volume at current bridge.
Recommended publications
  • CALVERT CLIFFS FOSSL LOCALITIES County, Maryland
    CALVERT CLIFFS FOSSL LOCALITIES The following fossil localities are currently (September,20l2) open to the public. All restrict coliecting to beach flotsam and jetsam or cliff blocks fallen on the Leach. Do NoT cLIMB oR DIG IN THE CLIFFS wITHouT PERMISSIoN! Localities are listed north to south. 1. Bayside Park (know to locals as Brownee's Beach), Chesapeake Beach, C{vert County, Maryland. Maryland Route 4 south to Maryland Route 260 east (left) "TO CHESAPE4-fE gEaCH". From Route 260 turn right onto Maryland Route 261 south. Drive about I . 1 to I .2 miles south to parking lot on east side of road at bottom of hill. Do not park on shoulders of road. Walk east about 200 yards to beach. Admission charge $tO.OO adult Memorial Day through Labor Day, resident and age discounts, free rest of year. Calvert Formation, small shark teeth common in gravel, some shelled invertebrates- Phone: (301) 855-8398 or (410) 257-2230. Z.Breezy Point beach, Chesapeake Beach, Calvert County, Maryland. Maryland Route 4 south to Maryland Route 260 east(left) "TO CHESAPEAKE BEACH". Turn right onto Maryland Route 261 south for five miles. Turn left (east) onto Breezy Point Road (green road sign, "BREEZY POINT). One mile to BREEZY POINT BEACH AND CAMPGROLJND, operated by Calvert County Department of Parks and Recreation. Open May I to October 31. Bathing beach, $10.00 adults, $4.00 age 3-11, various discounts. Calvert Formation, small shark teeth common in gravel. Phone: (410) 535-1600 x2225; (301) 855-1243 x2225. 3. Matoaka Cottages, Po Box 124, St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Calvert County Priority Letter
    CALVERT COUNTY Hoard of Commissioners BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mike Ilan Courthouse, 175 Main Street Tom 11(10 Prince Frederick. Maryland 20678 Pat Nutter 410-535-1600 • 301-855-1243 Evan Slaughenhoupt Jr. www.co.cal.ind.us Steven R. Weems February 28, 2017 Mr. Pete K. Rahn, Transportation Secretary Maryland Department of Transportation 7201 Corporate Center Drive P.O. Box 548 Hanover, Maryland 21076 Dear Secretary Rahn: We thank you and the various business units of the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) for a very successful year of working together to maintain the integrity and safety of our roads! We want to especially compliment you on progress made streamlining and simplifying the access management process and also in moving forward with planning for strategic highway safety. County staff has taken an active part in working with State personnel and participating in State workshops to bring about positive change. Enclosed are our priority transportation projects. We want to draw your attention to transportation issues in Calvert County and Southern Maryland. We thank MDOT for the construction funding for Phase 2 of the MD 2-4 project to widen and improve MD 2-4 through Prince Frederick that was in last year's budget. While this project did not go to advertisement in 2016 as planned, we hope the funding for this project remains intact and construction starts FY 2018. It is important to note that 60% of our workforce commutes out of the County and uses this corridor every single day, twice a day. MD 2-4 is the main artery in Calvert, used by not only our commuters but by everyone traversing our County.
    [Show full text]
  • All Hazard Mitigation Plan • Mitigation Actions
    2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland Calvert County Maryland All-Hazard Mitigation Plan June 1, 2017 Page | i 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Page | ii 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Calvert County, Maryland June 12, 2017 Prepared For: Calvert County Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management 175 Main Street Prince Frederick, MD 20678 Acknowledgements: This All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was prepared under the guidance of the County’s Department of Public Safety and the Division of Emergency Management with the participation of the Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee. Members of the Steering Committee are listed in Chapter 1. This plan was funded by a grant from the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant. This plan is an update of the original 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan. As such, certain sections of the plan, such as the county background and geography, have been retained for continuity. Prepared By: Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Eastern Shore Regional GIS Cooperative 8171 Maple Lawn Blvd. Salisbury University Suite 245 1101 Camden Avenue Fulton, MD 20759 Salisbury, MD 20801 Deepa Srinivasan, AICP, CFM Dr. Michael Scott, GISP 888.872.9626 410.543.6456 [email protected] [email protected] Page | iii 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Page | iv 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland Table
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mary'sst. Mary's THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020
    FREE St. Mary'sSt. Mary's THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020 CountyWWW.COUNTYTIMES.SOMD.COM Times Back to the Classrooms? 2 The County Times Thursday, June 18, 2020 CONTENTS LOCAL 3 COPS & COURTS 10 ON THE COVER Superintendent Dr. J. Scott Smith, along with employees like Jackie Snyder, an in- COMMUNITY 11 structional resource teacher, are planning on reopening classrooms in the fall. FEATURE 17 PAX RIVER 19 EDUCATION 20 LOCAL 6 COMMUNITY 12 Planning Commission approves Tech Port, FIT partner on flying SPORTS 23 church, warehouse projects. lessons. OBITUARIES 25 “I DON’T HAVE $18,000 TO GET INTERNET ACCESS… WE REALLY DO NEED TO INVEST IN THE HOTSPOTS CALENDAR 29 FOR THE STUDENTS SO THEY CAN DO THEIR WORK.” SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER RITA WEAVER ON GETTING STUDENTS CONNECTED TO THE CONTRIBUTING WRITERS 29 INTERNET IN RURAL AREAS. BUSINESS DIRECTORY 30 WEEKLY FORECAST FUN & GAMES 31 DO YOU FEEL CRABBY WHEN YOU GET YOUR P.O. Box 250 • Hollywood, Maryland 20636 301-373-4125 INSURANCE BILL www.countytimes.net CountySt. Times Mary’s County ● Calvert County For staff listing and emails, see page 39 IN THE MAIL? Can’t Find Us On The GIVE US A CALL.BRYANS ROAD YOU’LL BE GLAD YOU DID. News Stand? LEONARDTOWN Find Us Online @ Burris’ Olde Towne Insurance www.countytimes.net Auto • Home • Business • LIFE For Daily News Updates On LEONARDTOWN BRYANS ROAD 301-475-3151 301-743-9000 COVID-19 In St. Mary’s And Calvert Counties Go To: WWW.DANBURRIS.COM AN INDEPENDENT AGENT REPRESENTING facebook.com/CountyTimesCalvert ERIE INSURANCE GROUP facebook.com/CountyTimesStMarys Thursday, June 18, 2020 The County Times Local News 3 Commissioners Give $400,000 for Student Computers By Guy Leonard tic Broadband lay more broadband cable The county’s allocation was $109 million project, $2 million to a small business relief Staff Writer down 15 county roads where internet ser- this year, $3 million more than last year’s program, $2 million for payroll with rest The Commissioners of St.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mary's County
    Confidential Land Offering - St. Mary’s County, MD 22.76 Acres - High Density Residential or Retail 22835 Old Rolling Road, California, MD 20619 THREE NOTCH ROAD DD A FDRFDR BOULEVARDBOULEVARD O R G N LII LL O R LD O Presented by: Josh Weiner Brad Berzins, SIOR Craig Morrell, SIOR Stevan Varga KLNB KLNB KLNB Enterprise Realty Services 8065 Leesburg Pike, Suite 700 100 West Road, Suite 505 6011 University Blvd, Suite 350 10000 Falls Road, Suite 102 Tysons, VA 22182 Baltimore, MD 21204 Ellicott City, MD 21043 Potomac, MD 20854 tel 703 268 2715 | fax 703 268 2700 tel 443 632 2048 | fax 410 321 0129 tel 443 574 1425 | fax 410 290 0723 tel 301 294 0795 | fax 301 294 5918 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 22835 Old Rolling Road CALIFORNIA, MARYLAND NAI KLNB (“Broker”) has been retained by the owner of 22835 Old Rolling Road in California, Maryland (“Property”) as the exclusive broker for this acquisition opportunity. This Confidential Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Broker for use by the prospective purchaser (“Prospective Purchaser”) to whom Broker has provided this Confidential Offering Memorandum. Although the information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reasonably reliable, Owner and Broker, on their own behalf, and on behalf of their respective officers, employees, shareholders, partners, directors, members and affiliates, disclaim any responsibility or liability for inaccuracies, representations and warranties (expressed or implied) contained in, or omitted from, the Confidential Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication or information transmitted or made available to the recipient of this Confidential Offering Memorandum.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Legislative Priorities (PDF)
    TRANSPORTATION Legislative Priorities Our Priorities Will Include: Arena Drive – This interchange is the gateway to the new University of Maryland Regional Med- ical Center and the new downtown Largo. The infrastructure must be improved and expanded to provide multi-modal mobility and access to the regional medical center and downtown Largo. Full interchanges are needed as part of that project. Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) – Advancing the current work at Kerby Hill Road as expeditiously as possible and continuing further South along the MD 210 corridor is of paramount importance to Prince George’s County. Moving forward with subsequent interchanges are a must to improve safety on this dangerous roadway. Route 4 at Suitland Parkway – The Maryland Route 4 Route 1 – This is the gateway to the state’s at Suitland Parkway project has been marked by delays, premier university, which is also a primary eco- scalebacks, and construction issues. The state should nomic driver in the county. Now that the state is immediately address them by fast tracking the project advancing into construction and has reduced the through construction under a new contractor and restor- time frame for the first phase, it is critical to move ing it closer to its original design with the flyover. Given the subsequent phases forward. The streetscaping the delays and inconvenience that the community faces, it and safety measures, including sidewalk improve- deserves the best possible project once constructed. ments, will greatly enhance the Route 1 Corridor. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Legislative Priorities After leading the state in job growth for five consecutive years, we saw all of those gains wiped out during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic and now have more than 150,000 unemployed residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Name 6. Representation in Existing Surveys
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_____________ 1. Name historic Compton Bassett and/or common Compton Bassett 2. Location street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike N/A not for publication city, town Upper Marlboro _X_ vicinity of congressional district Fourth state Maryland code county Prince George's code 033 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public _ X. occupied X agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X not applicable X no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Robert B. Sasscer and Henry S. Sasscer street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike city, town Upper Marlboro vicinity of state Maryland 20870 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Prince George's County Courthouse street & number city, town Upper Marlboro state Maryland 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title See Continuation Sheet #1 has this property been determined elegible? __ yes JL_ no date X federal X state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one _ X excellent deteriorated unaltered X original site good ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Compton Bassett is a Georgian mansion built ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Master Plan
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Calvert County Planning Commission VIA: Yolanda Hipski, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator' FROM: Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Principal Planner DATE: September 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Text Amendment #13-10, Proposed Amendment to the Huntingtown Master Plan (Section IV E) Regarding Landscaping, 100 Foot Wooded Buffer along MD Route 2/4, and Proposed Amendment to the Huntingtown Town Center Zoning Ordinance (Section 5-3) Regarding Setbacks from MD Route 2/4 Background The Board of County Commissioners received a letter from Mark Davis requesting that the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance be amended. Mr. Davis, representing Oldtown Automobile and Truck Sales, Inc., requests the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance "be amended to modify the extent and location of the 100' wooded buffer along the western edge of MD Route 2/4 which is to be `preserved' under Action #2 of the Landscaping section of the Huntingtown Master Plan." Mr. Davis subsequently submitted an application for a master plan and zoning ordinance amendment. A work session was held on August 20, 2013, with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss the proposed text amendments. The Commissioners directed staff to prepare additional options and present them during a work session with the Planning Commission. Discussion Text Amendment Case No.I3-10 — Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Master Plan (Section IV E) Re: Landscaping, 100 Foot Wooded Buffer along MD 2/4, and Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Zoning Ordinance (Section 5-3) Re: Setbacks from Roads (MD 2/4) The applicant's proposed amendments would change the southern terminus of the 100 foot wooded buffer, reducing the buffer length along MD 2/4.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of County Commissioners Planning Commission 1&Quo
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Planning Commission 1" VIA: Terry Shannon, County Administrator Thomas Barnett, AICP1, Director Yolanda Hipski, AICP, Planning Commission Administrato FROM: Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Long Range Planner sci? DATE: August 14, 2015 SUBJECT: August 25, 2015 Joint Public Hearing - Text Amendment 13-10 Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance Background Mark Davis, on behalf of Oldtown Automobile and Truck Sales, Inc., submitted an application for amendments to the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Huntingtown Master Plan amendments include amendments to the Huntingtown Town Center Master Plan Map (Exhibit 8 and Figure 5) and text amendments to a landscaping action under Community Appearance (Section IV E. Landscaping 2). Proposed amendments would modify the extent and location of the wooded buffer along the Town Center's eastern boundary along MD 2/4. Proposed Huntingtown Zoning Ordinance amendments include text amendments to setbacks from roads (Article 5, Section 5-3). Proposed amendments would modify the extent and location of the 100 foot buffer setback from MD 2/4. Discussion A joint public hearing of the Calvert County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners is scheduled for Tuesday, August 25, 2015. The Staff Report is attached. Recommendation/Conclusion Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission hold the joint public hearing, decide whether to close
    [Show full text]
  • INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry L. Shannon, County Administrator -1.5 J. Mark Willis, Director G-2\ ---- Britany Waddell, AICP, Deputy Director Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Long Range Planner riFli\-1 h/ ZU--) FROM: Tamara Blake-Wallace, Principal Planner ?, DATE: October 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Maryland Department of Transportation Consolidated Transportation Plan Tour 2018 Background: Every Fall, the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT), and the heads of the Maryland Department of Transportation's five business units and one authority, State Highway Administration (SHA), Transit Administration (MTA), Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA), Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA), Maryland Port Administration (MPA) and Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA), meet with each of Maryland's 23 counties and Baltimore City to present a message from the Secretary and the highlights from the current draft Consolidated Transportation Plan (CTP) to local elected officials and citizens for comment and questions. The MDOT's Draft Capital Program is then revised and submitted with the Governor's Budget to the General Assembly in January. Copies of the full draft Plan will be available at your meeting. The 2018 Tour for Calvert County is scheduled for Tuesday, October 30, 2018. Discussion: A list of the Calvert County Transportation Priorities for 2018 (attached) was sent to Secretary Rahn on March 20, 2018. CTP Tour staff will update the Board of County Commissioners on the current status of the projects to date and funding status. Fiscal Impact: None Conclusion/Recommendation: The CTP Tour will give the Board of County Commissioners and the public an opportunity to have a dialogue, discuss issues, and voice priorities in person with Secretary Rahn and representatives of MDOT's Business Units.
    [Show full text]