Calvert County 2008 Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calvert County 2008 Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan CALVERT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATER & SEWERAGE PLAN 2008 PREPARED BY THE CALVERT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING January 2008 This Plan and the maps included therein contain color images. Because of the inability of the reproducing technology employed by the Circuit Court to duplicate colors, the user should not rely on the duplicated maps and color images maintained by the Circuit Court Clerk. Instead, the user should consult the original recorded documents which are available at the Calvert County Department of Planning and Zoning. Adopted Calvert County Water and Sewer Plan CALVERT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATER & SEWERAGE PLAN 2008 Prepared for Board of County Commissioners by the CALVERT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING COURTHOUSE PRINCE FREDERICK, MD 20678 Gregory A. Bowen, Director L. Christopher Campany, Deputy Director David C. Brownlee, Principal Environmental Planner The Department of Public Works, Bureau of Utilities Barry King, Chief and by Consultant Loiederman Soltesz Associates, Inc. Staff Support: Ray Alvey Plan was prepared to fulfill the requirements of Maryland Department of Environment Regulations 26.03.01 and to implement county growth management and planning policies. This Plan supersedes the County Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan originally adopted November 4, 1975, updated August 2, 1994 and September 29,1998, and amended regularly thereafter. A list of Plan updates and amendments can be found in Appendix A. II Adopted Calvert County Water and Sewer Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES & MAPS ........................................................................................................V CERTIFICATES ..........................................................................................................................................VII CHAPTER ONE - COUNTY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................... 1 A. LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ..................................................................2 B. WASTE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES....................................................................................................2 C. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND GENERAL SERVICES ..................................................................................2 D. WATER AND SEWER ACTION PLAN.......................................................................................................2 E. ORGANIZATION OF AGENCIES AND COMMISSIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT, ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION..........................................................4 F. AUTHORITY..................................................................................................................................................5 G. TRIENNIAL CYCLE FOR REVISION OF PLAN ......................................................................................6 H. AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN ....................................................................................................................6 I. CONSTRUCTION OR MODIFICATION OF COMMUNITY AND MULTI-USE SYSTEMS..................7 J. CONFORMANCE WITH WATER CONSERVATION PLUMBING FIXTURE ACT REQUIREMENT (MWCPFA) ....................................................................................................................................................7 K. POLICY ON THE ALLOCATION OF WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE TREATMENT CAPACITY.....................................................................................................................................................8 L. APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION PLATS AND BUILDING PERMITS.....................................................9 M. DEFINITIONS USED IN THIS PLAN.......................................................................................................10 CHAPTER TWO – BACKGROUND INFORMATION................................................................................. 13 A. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................................................13 B. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA...................................................................................................................18 C. POPULATION .............................................................................................................................................20 D. LAND USE...................................................................................................................................................23 CHAPTER THREE – WATER SERVICE PLAN......................................................................................... 31 A. PHILOSOPHY.............................................................................................................................................31 B. GROUND WATER......................................................................................................................................32 C. SURFACE WATER.....................................................................................................................................33 D. WELL DRILLING & WATER ALLOCATIONS..........................................................................................34 E. PROJECTED WATER SUPPLY DEMANDS ..........................................................................................34 F. WATER CONSERVATION........................................................................................................................39 G. QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER............................................................................................................39 H. EXISTING WATER SYSTEMS .................................................................................................................41 I. THE WATER SERVICE PLAN ..................................................................................................................46 J. PLANNING CATEGORIES OF WATER SERVICE AREAS..................................................................46 K. POLICIES FOR NEW COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS AND SYSTEM EXTENSIONS ...............47 L. CRITERIA FOR COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS...............................................................................49 M. WATER SUPPLY PROBLEM AREAS .....................................................................................................49 N. GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLAN.................................................................................................51 III Adopted Calvert County Water and Sewer Plan CHAPTER FOUR - SEWERAGE SERVICE PLAN.................................................................................... 53 A. PHILOSOPHY.............................................................................................................................................53 B. PUBLIC FACILITIES - COUNTY SEWAGE SERVICES ......................................................................53 C. POLLUTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL........................................................................................54 D. PRESENT AND PROJECTED SEWAGE DEMANDS AND PLANNED CAPACITIES......................56 E. DEMAND MODIFICATION (SEWAGE)...................................................................................................58 F. EXISTING SEWAGE SYSTEMS ..............................................................................................................58 G. SEPTAGE AND SLUDGE DISPOSAL.....................................................................................................67 H. THE SEWER SERVICE PLAN..................................................................................................................69 I. PLANNING CATEGORIES OF SEWERAGE SERVICE AREAS.........................................................70 J. NEW SEWERAGE PLAN POLICIES ......................................................................................................71 K. SEWAGE PROBLEM AREAS ..................................................................................................................73 CHAPTER FIVE – WATER AND SEWERAGE SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN............................. 77 A. PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................77 B. LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING............................................................................................77 C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING .............................................................................79 D. PRIORITY SYSTEM...................................................................................................................................79 E. WATER AND SEWER NEEDS ANALYSIS.............................................................................................80 F. PRIORITIES FOR WATER SERVICE......................................................................................................80 G. PRIORITIES FOR SEWERAGE DEVELOPMENT................................................................................82 H. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER ....................................................................86 I. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT……………………………………………………………………………..87 IV Adopted Calvert County Water and Sewer Plan LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES, APPENDICES & MAPS TABLES
Recommended publications
  • CALVERT CLIFFS FOSSL LOCALITIES County, Maryland
    CALVERT CLIFFS FOSSL LOCALITIES The following fossil localities are currently (September,20l2) open to the public. All restrict coliecting to beach flotsam and jetsam or cliff blocks fallen on the Leach. Do NoT cLIMB oR DIG IN THE CLIFFS wITHouT PERMISSIoN! Localities are listed north to south. 1. Bayside Park (know to locals as Brownee's Beach), Chesapeake Beach, C{vert County, Maryland. Maryland Route 4 south to Maryland Route 260 east (left) "TO CHESAPE4-fE gEaCH". From Route 260 turn right onto Maryland Route 261 south. Drive about I . 1 to I .2 miles south to parking lot on east side of road at bottom of hill. Do not park on shoulders of road. Walk east about 200 yards to beach. Admission charge $tO.OO adult Memorial Day through Labor Day, resident and age discounts, free rest of year. Calvert Formation, small shark teeth common in gravel, some shelled invertebrates- Phone: (301) 855-8398 or (410) 257-2230. Z.Breezy Point beach, Chesapeake Beach, Calvert County, Maryland. Maryland Route 4 south to Maryland Route 260 east(left) "TO CHESAPEAKE BEACH". Turn right onto Maryland Route 261 south for five miles. Turn left (east) onto Breezy Point Road (green road sign, "BREEZY POINT). One mile to BREEZY POINT BEACH AND CAMPGROLJND, operated by Calvert County Department of Parks and Recreation. Open May I to October 31. Bathing beach, $10.00 adults, $4.00 age 3-11, various discounts. Calvert Formation, small shark teeth common in gravel. Phone: (410) 535-1600 x2225; (301) 855-1243 x2225. 3. Matoaka Cottages, Po Box 124, St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Calvert County Priority Letter
    CALVERT COUNTY Hoard of Commissioners BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mike Ilan Courthouse, 175 Main Street Tom 11(10 Prince Frederick. Maryland 20678 Pat Nutter 410-535-1600 • 301-855-1243 Evan Slaughenhoupt Jr. www.co.cal.ind.us Steven R. Weems February 28, 2017 Mr. Pete K. Rahn, Transportation Secretary Maryland Department of Transportation 7201 Corporate Center Drive P.O. Box 548 Hanover, Maryland 21076 Dear Secretary Rahn: We thank you and the various business units of the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) for a very successful year of working together to maintain the integrity and safety of our roads! We want to especially compliment you on progress made streamlining and simplifying the access management process and also in moving forward with planning for strategic highway safety. County staff has taken an active part in working with State personnel and participating in State workshops to bring about positive change. Enclosed are our priority transportation projects. We want to draw your attention to transportation issues in Calvert County and Southern Maryland. We thank MDOT for the construction funding for Phase 2 of the MD 2-4 project to widen and improve MD 2-4 through Prince Frederick that was in last year's budget. While this project did not go to advertisement in 2016 as planned, we hope the funding for this project remains intact and construction starts FY 2018. It is important to note that 60% of our workforce commutes out of the County and uses this corridor every single day, twice a day. MD 2-4 is the main artery in Calvert, used by not only our commuters but by everyone traversing our County.
    [Show full text]
  • All Hazard Mitigation Plan • Mitigation Actions
    2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland Calvert County Maryland All-Hazard Mitigation Plan June 1, 2017 Page | i 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Page | ii 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Calvert County, Maryland June 12, 2017 Prepared For: Calvert County Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management 175 Main Street Prince Frederick, MD 20678 Acknowledgements: This All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was prepared under the guidance of the County’s Department of Public Safety and the Division of Emergency Management with the participation of the Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee. Members of the Steering Committee are listed in Chapter 1. This plan was funded by a grant from the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant. This plan is an update of the original 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan. As such, certain sections of the plan, such as the county background and geography, have been retained for continuity. Prepared By: Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Eastern Shore Regional GIS Cooperative 8171 Maple Lawn Blvd. Salisbury University Suite 245 1101 Camden Avenue Fulton, MD 20759 Salisbury, MD 20801 Deepa Srinivasan, AICP, CFM Dr. Michael Scott, GISP 888.872.9626 410.543.6456 [email protected] [email protected] Page | iii 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Page | iv 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Calvert County, Maryland Table
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mary'sst. Mary's THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020
    FREE St. Mary'sSt. Mary's THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020 CountyWWW.COUNTYTIMES.SOMD.COM Times Back to the Classrooms? 2 The County Times Thursday, June 18, 2020 CONTENTS LOCAL 3 COPS & COURTS 10 ON THE COVER Superintendent Dr. J. Scott Smith, along with employees like Jackie Snyder, an in- COMMUNITY 11 structional resource teacher, are planning on reopening classrooms in the fall. FEATURE 17 PAX RIVER 19 EDUCATION 20 LOCAL 6 COMMUNITY 12 Planning Commission approves Tech Port, FIT partner on flying SPORTS 23 church, warehouse projects. lessons. OBITUARIES 25 “I DON’T HAVE $18,000 TO GET INTERNET ACCESS… WE REALLY DO NEED TO INVEST IN THE HOTSPOTS CALENDAR 29 FOR THE STUDENTS SO THEY CAN DO THEIR WORK.” SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER RITA WEAVER ON GETTING STUDENTS CONNECTED TO THE CONTRIBUTING WRITERS 29 INTERNET IN RURAL AREAS. BUSINESS DIRECTORY 30 WEEKLY FORECAST FUN & GAMES 31 DO YOU FEEL CRABBY WHEN YOU GET YOUR P.O. Box 250 • Hollywood, Maryland 20636 301-373-4125 INSURANCE BILL www.countytimes.net CountySt. Times Mary’s County ● Calvert County For staff listing and emails, see page 39 IN THE MAIL? Can’t Find Us On The GIVE US A CALL.BRYANS ROAD YOU’LL BE GLAD YOU DID. News Stand? LEONARDTOWN Find Us Online @ Burris’ Olde Towne Insurance www.countytimes.net Auto • Home • Business • LIFE For Daily News Updates On LEONARDTOWN BRYANS ROAD 301-475-3151 301-743-9000 COVID-19 In St. Mary’s And Calvert Counties Go To: WWW.DANBURRIS.COM AN INDEPENDENT AGENT REPRESENTING facebook.com/CountyTimesCalvert ERIE INSURANCE GROUP facebook.com/CountyTimesStMarys Thursday, June 18, 2020 The County Times Local News 3 Commissioners Give $400,000 for Student Computers By Guy Leonard tic Broadband lay more broadband cable The county’s allocation was $109 million project, $2 million to a small business relief Staff Writer down 15 county roads where internet ser- this year, $3 million more than last year’s program, $2 million for payroll with rest The Commissioners of St.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mary's County
    Confidential Land Offering - St. Mary’s County, MD 22.76 Acres - High Density Residential or Retail 22835 Old Rolling Road, California, MD 20619 THREE NOTCH ROAD DD A FDRFDR BOULEVARDBOULEVARD O R G N LII LL O R LD O Presented by: Josh Weiner Brad Berzins, SIOR Craig Morrell, SIOR Stevan Varga KLNB KLNB KLNB Enterprise Realty Services 8065 Leesburg Pike, Suite 700 100 West Road, Suite 505 6011 University Blvd, Suite 350 10000 Falls Road, Suite 102 Tysons, VA 22182 Baltimore, MD 21204 Ellicott City, MD 21043 Potomac, MD 20854 tel 703 268 2715 | fax 703 268 2700 tel 443 632 2048 | fax 410 321 0129 tel 443 574 1425 | fax 410 290 0723 tel 301 294 0795 | fax 301 294 5918 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 22835 Old Rolling Road CALIFORNIA, MARYLAND NAI KLNB (“Broker”) has been retained by the owner of 22835 Old Rolling Road in California, Maryland (“Property”) as the exclusive broker for this acquisition opportunity. This Confidential Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Broker for use by the prospective purchaser (“Prospective Purchaser”) to whom Broker has provided this Confidential Offering Memorandum. Although the information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reasonably reliable, Owner and Broker, on their own behalf, and on behalf of their respective officers, employees, shareholders, partners, directors, members and affiliates, disclaim any responsibility or liability for inaccuracies, representations and warranties (expressed or implied) contained in, or omitted from, the Confidential Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication or information transmitted or made available to the recipient of this Confidential Offering Memorandum.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Legislative Priorities (PDF)
    TRANSPORTATION Legislative Priorities Our Priorities Will Include: Arena Drive – This interchange is the gateway to the new University of Maryland Regional Med- ical Center and the new downtown Largo. The infrastructure must be improved and expanded to provide multi-modal mobility and access to the regional medical center and downtown Largo. Full interchanges are needed as part of that project. Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) – Advancing the current work at Kerby Hill Road as expeditiously as possible and continuing further South along the MD 210 corridor is of paramount importance to Prince George’s County. Moving forward with subsequent interchanges are a must to improve safety on this dangerous roadway. Route 4 at Suitland Parkway – The Maryland Route 4 Route 1 – This is the gateway to the state’s at Suitland Parkway project has been marked by delays, premier university, which is also a primary eco- scalebacks, and construction issues. The state should nomic driver in the county. Now that the state is immediately address them by fast tracking the project advancing into construction and has reduced the through construction under a new contractor and restor- time frame for the first phase, it is critical to move ing it closer to its original design with the flyover. Given the subsequent phases forward. The streetscaping the delays and inconvenience that the community faces, it and safety measures, including sidewalk improve- deserves the best possible project once constructed. ments, will greatly enhance the Route 1 Corridor. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Legislative Priorities After leading the state in job growth for five consecutive years, we saw all of those gains wiped out during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic and now have more than 150,000 unemployed residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Name 6. Representation in Existing Surveys
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_____________ 1. Name historic Compton Bassett and/or common Compton Bassett 2. Location street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike N/A not for publication city, town Upper Marlboro _X_ vicinity of congressional district Fourth state Maryland code county Prince George's code 033 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public _ X. occupied X agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X not applicable X no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Robert B. Sasscer and Henry S. Sasscer street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike city, town Upper Marlboro vicinity of state Maryland 20870 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Prince George's County Courthouse street & number city, town Upper Marlboro state Maryland 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title See Continuation Sheet #1 has this property been determined elegible? __ yes JL_ no date X federal X state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one _ X excellent deteriorated unaltered X original site good ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Compton Bassett is a Georgian mansion built ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Master Plan
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Calvert County Planning Commission VIA: Yolanda Hipski, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator' FROM: Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Principal Planner DATE: September 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Text Amendment #13-10, Proposed Amendment to the Huntingtown Master Plan (Section IV E) Regarding Landscaping, 100 Foot Wooded Buffer along MD Route 2/4, and Proposed Amendment to the Huntingtown Town Center Zoning Ordinance (Section 5-3) Regarding Setbacks from MD Route 2/4 Background The Board of County Commissioners received a letter from Mark Davis requesting that the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance be amended. Mr. Davis, representing Oldtown Automobile and Truck Sales, Inc., requests the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance "be amended to modify the extent and location of the 100' wooded buffer along the western edge of MD Route 2/4 which is to be `preserved' under Action #2 of the Landscaping section of the Huntingtown Master Plan." Mr. Davis subsequently submitted an application for a master plan and zoning ordinance amendment. A work session was held on August 20, 2013, with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss the proposed text amendments. The Commissioners directed staff to prepare additional options and present them during a work session with the Planning Commission. Discussion Text Amendment Case No.I3-10 — Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Master Plan (Section IV E) Re: Landscaping, 100 Foot Wooded Buffer along MD 2/4, and Proposed Amendment of the Huntingtown Zoning Ordinance (Section 5-3) Re: Setbacks from Roads (MD 2/4) The applicant's proposed amendments would change the southern terminus of the 100 foot wooded buffer, reducing the buffer length along MD 2/4.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of County Commissioners Planning Commission 1&Quo
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Planning Commission 1" VIA: Terry Shannon, County Administrator Thomas Barnett, AICP1, Director Yolanda Hipski, AICP, Planning Commission Administrato FROM: Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Long Range Planner sci? DATE: August 14, 2015 SUBJECT: August 25, 2015 Joint Public Hearing - Text Amendment 13-10 Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance Background Mark Davis, on behalf of Oldtown Automobile and Truck Sales, Inc., submitted an application for amendments to the Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Huntingtown Master Plan amendments include amendments to the Huntingtown Town Center Master Plan Map (Exhibit 8 and Figure 5) and text amendments to a landscaping action under Community Appearance (Section IV E. Landscaping 2). Proposed amendments would modify the extent and location of the wooded buffer along the Town Center's eastern boundary along MD 2/4. Proposed Huntingtown Zoning Ordinance amendments include text amendments to setbacks from roads (Article 5, Section 5-3). Proposed amendments would modify the extent and location of the 100 foot buffer setback from MD 2/4. Discussion A joint public hearing of the Calvert County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners is scheduled for Tuesday, August 25, 2015. The Staff Report is attached. Recommendation/Conclusion Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission hold the joint public hearing, decide whether to close
    [Show full text]
  • INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry L. Shannon, County Administrator -1.5 J. Mark Willis, Director G-2\ ---- Britany Waddell, AICP, Deputy Director Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Long Range Planner riFli\-1 h/ ZU--) FROM: Tamara Blake-Wallace, Principal Planner ?, DATE: October 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Maryland Department of Transportation Consolidated Transportation Plan Tour 2018 Background: Every Fall, the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT), and the heads of the Maryland Department of Transportation's five business units and one authority, State Highway Administration (SHA), Transit Administration (MTA), Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA), Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA), Maryland Port Administration (MPA) and Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA), meet with each of Maryland's 23 counties and Baltimore City to present a message from the Secretary and the highlights from the current draft Consolidated Transportation Plan (CTP) to local elected officials and citizens for comment and questions. The MDOT's Draft Capital Program is then revised and submitted with the Governor's Budget to the General Assembly in January. Copies of the full draft Plan will be available at your meeting. The 2018 Tour for Calvert County is scheduled for Tuesday, October 30, 2018. Discussion: A list of the Calvert County Transportation Priorities for 2018 (attached) was sent to Secretary Rahn on March 20, 2018. CTP Tour staff will update the Board of County Commissioners on the current status of the projects to date and funding status. Fiscal Impact: None Conclusion/Recommendation: The CTP Tour will give the Board of County Commissioners and the public an opportunity to have a dialogue, discuss issues, and voice priorities in person with Secretary Rahn and representatives of MDOT's Business Units.
    [Show full text]