Referendum on Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bovine Benefactories: an Examination of the Role of Religion in Cow Sanctuaries Across the United States
BOVINE BENEFACTORIES: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF RELIGION IN COW SANCTUARIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES _______________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _______________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ________________________________________________________________ by Thomas Hellmuth Berendt August, 2018 Examing Committee Members: Sydney White, Advisory Chair, TU Department of Religion Terry Rey, TU Department of Religion Laura Levitt, TU Department of Religion Tom Waidzunas, External Member, TU Deparment of Sociology ABSTRACT This study examines the growing phenomenon to protect the bovine in the United States and will question to what extent religion plays a role in the formation of bovine sanctuaries. My research has unearthed that there are approximately 454 animal sanctuaries in the United States, of which 146 are dedicated to farm animals. However, of this 166 only 4 are dedicated to pigs, while 17 are specifically dedicated to the bovine. Furthermore, another 50, though not specifically dedicated to cows, do use the cow as the main symbol for their logo. Therefore the bovine is seemingly more represented and protected than any other farm animal in sanctuaries across the United States. The question is why the bovine, and how much has religion played a role in elevating this particular animal above all others. Furthermore, what constitutes a sanctuary? Does -
Volume 7 of Jury Trial
Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 56 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 4 ) ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) 6 vs. ) CASE NO. CR-18-227-SLP ) 7 ) ) 8 JOSEPH MALDONADO-PASSAGE, ) ) 9 ) ) 10 Defendant. ) 11 12 * * * * * * 13 VOLUME VII OF VII 14 TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL 15 BEFORE THE HONORABLE SCOTT L. PALK 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 APRIL 2, 2019 18 * * * * * * * 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography; transcript produced by computer- aided transcription. Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S. Courthouse, 200 N.W. 4th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73102 * 405.609.5403 Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 56 2 1 APPEARANCES 2 Ms. Amanda Maxfield-Green and Mr. Charles Brown, Assistant United States Attorneys, U.S. Attorney's Office, 210 West Park 3 Avenue, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, appearing for the United States of America. 4 Mr. William Earley and Mr. Kyle Wackenheim, Assistant United 5 States Public Defenders, 215 Dean A. McGee, Suite 124, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, appearing for the defendant. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S. Courthouse, 200 N.W. 4th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73102 * 405.609.5403 Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 3 of 56 1054 1 INDEX PAGE 2 Closing argument by the Government.....................1055 3 Closing argument by the Defense........................1078 4 Final closing by the Government........................1095 5 Verdict................................................1101 6 Reporter's Certificate.................................1107 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S. -
May/June 2017 Newsletter
The Retreat Newsletter May/June 2017 Volume 14, Issue 3 My Mom By Vicki Celio My Mom, Victoria Zakian, never met a person she didn’t love. She taught me how to love and respect everyone. She taught me how to sew, cook and most of all to love our God with all my being. I miss my Mom everyday but I know how happy she is in heaven. Mother’s Day Memories MY PARENTS! By Marlene Boobar Gerri Strong and I are so blessed to have our By Patti Greaves daughters living close by. For several years, our tradition has been to enjoy brunch at Lady Ann’s Tea To start off, I am an only child. I did not Room on Mother’s Day. Some years the Moms treat have a lot of “stuff” growing up but I had and other years, the daughters treat! This picture all the love there was in our little Red shows us wearing similar scarves sent to us by my House in Stoneham Massachusetts. other daughter who lives in Maine. Although she was not able to join us, she was dearly remembered by the My mother was a nurse and my father was wearing of our “matching” scarves. Creating a memory a chemist and I was the circle of their life. My mother always has been the best gift of all to each of us. Those times had a smile, she kept our house clean as a whistle (did laundry will long be remembered and cherished. almost every day) hence I’m dubbed “THE LAUNDRY FAIRY” by my kids…guess the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. -
Case 1:13-Cv-10951-DJC Document 275 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:13-cv-10951-DJC Document 275 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DONALD THOMAS SCHOLZ, Plaintiff and Defendant-in-Counterclaim, v. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-10951-DJC BARRY GOUDREAU, Defendant and Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BARRY GOUDREAU’S MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) Pursuant to the Court’s order (D. 269), defendant BARRY GOUDREAU (“Goudreau”) hereby submits his memorandum of law in support of the above-referenced motion as prevailing party on the Lanham Act claims of plaintiff DONALD THOMAS SCHOLZ (“Scholz”). I. INTRODUCTION This case was never about violation of the Lanham Act. To say otherwise constitutes a failure in honesty to the Court. Putting it bluntly, Scholz’s Lanham Act claims were a sham. The Court disposed of most of those bogus claims on summary judgment, finding a complete lack of evidence. As for the remaining “indirect” infringement claims, ginned up in an amended pleading, there was never any consumer confusion, or even the remotest likelihood of such, in referring to Goudreau’s past participation (whether as “former” or “original” member) in the band BOSTON. There was never any harm to Scholz or his trademarks in doing so. The parties’ goods and services weren’t in competition, and were never likely to be. Lanham Act cases are difficult and complex. That Act has a fee-shifting provision for “exceptional” cases. The Supreme Court has recently provided guidance to the lower courts on how and when that provision should apply. -
A. Auto Racing: I
a. Auto Racing: i. NASCAR ii. NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series iii. NASCAR Xfinity Series iv. Formula One v. IndyCar b. Boxing: i. Professional bouts sanctioned by: a) International Boxing Federation (IBF); b) World Boxing Association (WBA); c) World Boxing Council (WBC) d) World Boxing Organization (WBO) e) Top Rank Boxing c. Basketball: i. NBA* (Pre-season, All-Star Game & Events, Post-Season Games, NBA Finals) ii. WNBA* (All-Star Game & Events, Post-Season Games, WNBA Finals) iii. NCAA* - Division 1 d. Baseball: i. MLB* (Spring Training, All-Star Games & Events, Post-Season Games, World Series) ii. Japan NPB (Nippon Professional Baseball) iii. Korean Baseball League iv. NCAA* – Division 1 e. Cycling: i. Tour de France f. Fighting: i. UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) ii. Bellator MMA iii. ONE Championship iv. International Mixed Martial Arts Federation v. Professional Fighters League (PFL) vi. British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC) g. Football: Revised: June 22, 2021 i. NFL* (Pre-Season, Pro Bowl & Events, Post-Season Games, Super Bowl) ii. CFL iii. XFL iv. Australian Football League v. NCAA* – FBS Division I-A, FCS Division I-AA h. Golf: i. PGA ii. PGA Tour Champions iii. LPGA iv. European Tour v. KLPGA vi. Ryders Cup vii. President’s Cup i. Hockey: i. NHL* (Pre-Season, All-Star Game and Events, Post-Season Games, Stanley Cup) ii. International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) Sanctioned Events iii. Kontinental Hockey League iv. NCAA* – Division 1 j. Horse Racing (Pari-Mutuel Only): k. PBR (Professional Bull Riders) l. Tennis: i. International Tennis Federation (ITF) Sanctioned Events ii. United States Tennis Association (USTA) Sanctioned Events iii. -
Tulalip Resort Casino Rocks out on May 25Th to the Sounds of Queen and Boston
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 19, 2014 For Information Contact: Lisa Severn, F & B Director Tulalip Resort Casino 10200 Quil Ceda Boulevard Tulalip, Washington 98271 (360) 716-1240 www.tulalipresort.com TULALIP RESORT CASINO ROCKS OUT ON MAY 25TH TO THE SOUNDS OF QUEEN AND BOSTON Tulalip, Washington --- Tulalip Resort Casino invites fans to rock to the pulsating sounds of Queen and Boston, on Sunday, May 25. Starting at 8:00pm in the Orca Ballroom, the Casino Resort will host “Rock the Empire,” a tribute style concert with classic music from two of the greatest bands of the 70’s and 80’s. Groupies can sway to the lively beats while sipping on cocktails from the no-host bar. Queen Nation - Queen Tribute Band Queen Nation was formed in 2004, and consists of band members: Joe Retta or Gregory Finsley on vocals and keyboards as Freddie Mercury; Mike McManus on guitar as Brian May; Pete Burke on drums as Roger Taylor; and Parker Combs on bass as John Deacon. The group’s mission is to carry on the musical torch and pay homage to the golden age of vintage Queen concerts. Music lovers can jam to ultimate Queen songs such as “Cold Stone Crazy,” “Tie Your Mother Down,” “Somebody to Love,” “Crazy Little Thing Called Love,” and more. Third Stage - Boston Tribute Band Borrowed Time hails from Seattle and will make their debut as “Third Stage” at Tulalip. They play the greatest hits from the band Boston, filling the show with great renditions and the enthusiasm that is reflective of the band's personalities. -
Published As Perspective in on Culture: the Open Journal for the Study of Culture (ISSN 2366-4142)
Published as _Perspective in On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture (ISSN 2366-4142) OF ANIMAL LOVE AND ABUSE: EXPLORING AMBIVALENT HUMAN-ANIMAL RELATIONSHIPS IN TIGER KING (2020) DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC LIZA B. BAUER [email protected] Liza B. Bauer, M.A. is a doctoral researcher at the International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) and holds a graduate scholarship from the Justus Liebig University Giessen. She studied Anglophone Studies in Marburg and Giessen and is currently working on her dissertation entitled Livestock in the Laboratory of Literature: The Cultural and Ethical Work of Farm Animal Representations in Anglophone Literary Thought Experiments. She further functions as one of the coordinators of the interdisciplinary research section “Human-Animal Studies” at her university’s Graduate Centre for the Study of Social Sciences, Business, Economics and Law (GGS) and works as an academic assistant for the International PhD program “Literary and Cultural Studies” (IPP) at the GCSC. KEYWORDS human-animal relations, tiger king, COVID-19, human-animal studies, pet-keeping, anthropocentrism PUBLICATION DATE Issue 9, September 3, 2020 HOW TO CITE Liza B. Bauer. “Of Animal Love and Abuse: Exploring Ambivalent Human-Animal Relationships in Tiger King (2020) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture #9 (2020). <http://geb.uni- giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/>. Permalink URL: <http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/> URN: <urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-opus-154477> On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture Issue #9 (2020): Love www.on-culture.org http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/ Of Animal Love and Abuse: Exploring Ambivalent Human-Animal Relationships in Tiger King (2020) during the COVID-19 Pandemic _Abstract On March 20, 2020, Netflix launched a new hit. -
2018-2019 Budget Estimates Volume of Additional Information
2018-2019 Budget Estimates Volume of Additional Information Report No. 5, 56th Parliament Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee August 2018 Table of Contents Minutes of Estimates meetings ......................................................................................... 1 Questions on notice and responses – Minister for Innovation and Tourism Industry Development and Minister for the Commonwealth Games ................................................ 2 Questions on notice and responses – Minister for Environment and the Great Barrier Reef, Minister for Science and Minister for the Arts .................................................................... 3 Documents tabled at hearing – 1 August 2018 ................................................................... 4 Correspondence ............................................................................................................... 5 i Minutes of Estimates meetings Minutes of Estimates Meetings Monday 11 June 2018 Monday, 18 June 2018 Wednesday, 1 August 2018 Monday, 13 August 2018 1 MINUTES - Estimates meeting No. 1 Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee Committee Room 1, Level 6, Parliamentary Annexe Monday, 11 Jun 2018 Present: M r Duncan Pegg MP (Chair) M em ber for Stretton M r Jon Krause MP (Deputy Chair) M em ber for Scenic Rim Ms Sandy Bolton MP M em ber for Noosa Ms Cynthia Lui MP M em ber for Cook Mrs Charis Mullen MP M em ber for Jordan Apologies: M r Jason Costigan MP M em ber for Whitsunday in attendance: Kate McGuckin Committee Secretary Greg Thomson Assistant Committee Secretary Private Estimates meeting commenced at 12.20 pm. 1 M em bers Inform ation M anual The committee noted the Estimates 2018 Members Information Manual. Standard resolutions 2.1 Ministerial Opening Statements Resolved That each Minister may make a brief opening statement of up to 5 minutes at the beginning of the committee's examination of each area of responsibility of that Minister. -
The Comment, September 27, 1979
Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University The ommeC nt Campus Journals and Publications 1979 The ommeC nt, September 27, 1979 Bridgewater State College Volume 53 Number 2 Recommended Citation Bridgewater State College. (1979). The Comment, September 27, 1979. 53(2). Retrieved from: http://vc.bridgew.edu/comment/451 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. The· Comment Vol. LIII No.2 Bridgewater 'State College September 27, 1979 by Elizabeth Fitch Divisions Merged The resignation of Dr. Milton L. game," said Boyle of his final budget considerations,Boyle said. Boyle, at Bridgewater State College decision to return to teaching full "At that point the Religious Studies in June 1979 as Dean of the time, as opposed to administering program developed a gap," the , Department of Humanities directly full·time. professor said. Boyle now teaches triggered the resulting merger Another prime factor in Boyle's all the Religious Studies courses·· between the departments of decision is his interest and concern four new ones every semester. Humanities and Creative Arts, in the Religious Studies program Asked whet her he had considered according to both Boyle and offered at BSC, the professor said. leaving BSC when confronted with Pwfessor Robert J. Barnett, now "I came here to d~velop a program resignation or leaving the teaching dean of the combined department. of Religious Studies. It was one goal profession, Boyle replied, "I like According to Boyle, eight-year in taking the position," he said. Bridgewater. I particularly like the director of the Division of Boyle has been successful and now kids~ And t here is a crying need for Humanities, his resignation was BSe offers a minor in this program. -
May 1, 2020 Animal Welfare Act Inspection and Annual Reports for Gene Wheeler DBA Special Memories Zoo N1426 Midway Rd
2020-APHIS-04196-F Brown, Ann Center for Biological Diversity 5/15/2020 6/15/2020 The Center and Xerces Society request from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Serv ce (“APHIS”): 1. From January 1, 2019 to the date APHIS conducts this search: a. The records between APHIS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) for Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming mentioning or including endangered species and endangered species consultations, requests for concurrence and concurrence letters regarding grasshopper spraying for all the 17 states covered by the October 2019 Grasshopper Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cr cket Suppress on; b. The records between APHIS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) only where relevant (California, Idaho, Oregon and Washington) mentioning or including endangered species and endangered species consultations, requests for concurrence and concurrence letters regarding grasshopper spraying for all the 17 states covered by the October 2019 Grasshopper Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cr cket Suppression; c. The records discussing m tigation measures generally, and specifically records that include RAATS (including the terms “Reduced Agent Area Treatments” or “strip treatments”) to protect wildlife populations within treatment sites; and d. The record of analysis supporting the decis on for each treatment. Specifically: i. The Hopper analyses for each treatment; ii. The Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSIs”) for all Environmental Assessments (“EAs”) that were finalized during the time period of interest; and iii. -
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ETHICS BOWL Case Set for 2020-2021 Regional Competitions
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ETHICS BOWL Case Set for 2020-2021 Regional Competitions Note: This case booklet has been modified by the Prindle Institute and contains questions that do not appear in the original document devised by the NHSEB Contents A NOTE FROM THE NHSEB Unless otherwise noted, these cases are the intellectual property of the Parr Center for Ethics. Please do not reproduce them, in part or whole, without credit. Please contact us at [email protected] for more information. CASES FOR REGIONALS 01 Factory Farming 02 TikTok Infamous 2020-2021 REGIONAL CASE COMMITTEE 03 (Un)charitable Donations No More Teachers, No More Books 05 04 CHAIR Alex Richardson What’s In A Name? 06 Dining Out During a Pandemic 07 The Korean Pop Industrial Complex 08 CONTRIBUTORS Christine Ball-Blakely, Guido Who Gets to Be Fashionable? Chiriboga, Alexandra Corbett, Ramona Ilea, Audra Jenson, Joanna Lawson, Camille Luong, Alex 09 Wholesome Discipline Richardson, Rachel Robison-Greene, Maggie Sun, 10 Dating After Prison Michael Vazquez, Dustin Webster, APPE 11 Contraceptive Controversy Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl 12 Harper’s Bizarre 13 (De)funding the Police 14 American Dirt 15 The Tiger King 1. Factory Farming Nearly all animal products consumed in the United States come from animals raised on factory farms, which are industrial-scale agricultural facilities that keep hundreds to thousands of animals in high-density confinement.1 These factory farms are only one component of the highly-consolidated animal agriculture industry, which is no longer controlled by family farmers, but by a handful of large corporations. The animal agriculture industry produces cheap animal products by prioritizing efficiency above all other considerations, including animal welfare, the environment, rural communities, human health, workers, and small family farms. -
'Tiger King' Shines Light on an Endangered Species Act Quirk by Stephanie Clark
'Tiger King' Shines Light On An Endangered Species Act Quirk By Stephanie Clark The sweeping and rapid ascent to popularity of Netflix Inc.'s "Tiger King" documentary series has fueled new interest in two congressional bills that stalled in committee last year, and has drawn public attention to a quirk of the Endangered Species Act, or ESA. The series, which focuses on the strange and true story of Joseph "Joe Exotic" Maldonado-Passage, broadly covers the existence of private zoos in the U.S., with a specific focus on big cat zoos and sanctuaries. As the series notes from the beginning, each of the big cats featured in these zoos is an endangered species whose numbers have dwindled significantly in the wild. How, then, are these private zoo Stephanie Clark owners permitted to breed captive endangered species, such as tigers? This is a quirk of the ESA. While the ESA protects these species from take "wherever found," it also allows for captive-bred wildlife to exist within the U.S., and provides an exception from the take prohibition for registered captive-bred wildlife. Specifically, the ESA's captive- bred wildlife program and a variety of other laws and regulations govern the keeping, breeding and transfer of wildlife that is otherwise endangered but located in zoos and sanctuaries in the U.S. What does the ESA prohibit? The ESA prohibits "taking" of endangered species. "Take" is defined to mean harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect. The ESA also makes it illegal to import, export, deliver, receive, carry, transport, ship in interstate or foreign commerce, sell or offer for sale in interstate or foreign commerce, take on the high seas, possess, ship, deliver, carry, transport, sell, or receive unlawfully taken wildlife.