This Is the Report for the Week Ending September 22, 2017. 1. Meeting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms
From: Terry Abrams Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:05 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re‐opening of the third lane on the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Terry L. Abrams ABRAMS CONSULTING Management Consultants www.abramsconsulting.net 1 From: Jeff Alpert Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:14 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re-opening of the third lane on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Jeffrey D.Alpert Managing Partner Milestone Trailer Leasing LLC Ph Cell 1 From: Shannon Appelcline Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:57 AM To: MTC Info Cc: Subject: Support for Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project I am writing to express my strong support for a bike lane across the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge. -
For Several Years, I Have Prepared Detailed Evaluations of City of Richmond Services, Problems Challenges and Wishes
Richmond, California Will Richmond be Riven in 2011? 2010 Year End Review Prediction and Wishes for 2011 Tom Butt, Richmond City Council Member January 1, 2011 Table of Contents A Decade of TOM BUTT E-FORUMS .......................................................................................................... 1 2010 – A Remarkable Year in Richmond ....................................................................................................... 2 Top Three Richmond Stories of 2010 ............................................................................................................ 3 1. Independent Progressives Sweep City Council Race ........................................................................ 3 2. Point Molate Casino a Poor Bet? ....................................................................................................... 6 3. Chevron Business and Utility Tax Issue Settled................................................................................ 8 Most Controversial Issues of 2010 ................................................................................................................10 1. Pot ....................................................................................................................................................10 2. Censored ...........................................................................................................................................10 3. Flotilla ..............................................................................................................................................10 -
San Francisco Bay Plan
San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill. -
Botanical Priority Guidebook
Botanical Priority Protection Areas Alameda and Contra Costa Counties the East Bay Regional Park District. However, certain BPPAs include Hills have been from residential development. public parcels or properties with other conservation status. These are cases where land has been conserved since the creation of these boundaries or where potential management decisions have the poten- Following this initial mapping effort, the East Bay Chap- \ ntroduction tial to negatively affect an area’s botanical resources. Additionally, ter’s Conservation Committee began to utilize the con- each acre within these BPPAs represents a potential area of high pri- cept in draft form in key local planning efforts. Lech ority. Both urban and natural settings are included within these Naumovich, the chapter’s Conservation Analyst staff The lands that comprise the East Bay Chapter are located at the convergence boundaries, therefore, they are intended to be considered as areas person, showcased the map set in forums such as the of the San Francisco Bay, the North and South Coast Ranges, the Sacra- warranting further scrutiny due to the abundance of nearby sensitive BAOSC’s Upland Habitat Goals Project and the Green mento-San Joaquin Delta, and the San Joaquin Valley. The East Bay Chapter botanical resources supported by high quality habitat within each E A S T B A Y Vision Group (in association with Greenbelt Alliance); area supports a unique congregation of ecological conditions and native BPPA. Although a parcel, available for preservation through fee title C N P S East Bay Regional Park District’s Master Plan Process; plants. Based on historic botanical collections, the pressures from growth- purchase or conservation easement, may be located within the and local municipalities. -
Bay Crossings 2005-2015
[City], [State] The Unique and Colorful History of Richmond’s Point Molate This month, we begin a series of articles about Richmond's Point Molate, a hidden-in-plain-view waterfront site with rich natural resources and an interesting past. September 2015 » ON OUR COVER September 2015 » Port of San Francisco Grabs National Spotlight » Terminal Supervisor Mark Andrade Located on the western shore of the Point San Pablo Peninsula about a mile and a half north of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, Point Molate offers a waterfront location, » diverse habitat, open space and nationally designated historic buildings. Photo by Joel Williams Future Holds Promises and BC Staff Report Challenges for Point Molate This month, we begin a series of articles about Richmond’s Point Molate, a hidden-in-plain-view waterfront site with rich natural » resources and an interesting past. This month focuses on the history of the site, while future installments will look at recent Coal From Utah redevelopment proposals and the natural features of Point Molate. Threatens the Bay With Pollution Point Molate is a tremendous asset to the City of Richmond. Located on the western shore of the Point San Pablo Peninsula about a mile and a half north of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, its waterfront location, diverse habitat, open space and nationally » designated historic buildings provide a number of opportunities to maximize the site’s economic and conservation potential. Like a Sturgeon » From Missiles to Point Molate offers 1.4 miles of unobstructed shoreline, more than 200 acres of upland open space and a 465-foot ridge line with Medicine: The Marine panoramic views of the San Francisco and San Pablo bays, Mount Tamalpais and the East Brother Light Station. -
Cultural Resources Survey Report for the San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate, Contra Costa County, California
Appendix D CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT Cultural Resources Survey Report for the San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate, Contra Costa County, California Prepared on Behalf of: Prepared By: East Bay Regional Park District NCE 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, P.O. Box 1760 P.O. Box 5381 Zephyr Cove, NV 89448 Oakland, CA 94605 NCE Project Number: 567.04.55 March 2018 Jeremy Hall With Contributions From: Cultural Resources Specialist Chad Moffett and Tim Smith NCE Architectural Historians Mead & Hunt ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY In 2009, the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) entered into an agreement for the donation of an easement for the San Francisco Bay Trail (Bay Trail) along the shoreline of their southernmost property on the San Pablo Peninsula at Point Molate. In 2013-14, the EBRPD hired NCE to conduct an alignment study for a Class I bike path and as a result, recorded the trail easement. Recently, the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) approved the installation of a bike and pedestrian path on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge to Marine Street, near Point Richmond, which would connect to the EBRPD’s easement at Stenmark Drive. The combined projects will connect trail users from both Richmond and Marin County to the San Pablo Peninsula. The proposed Bay Trail at Point Molate will be approximately 2.5 miles and extend north along the shoreline, through Chevron’s property, to the Point Molate Beach Park and Navel Fuel Depot property, owned and managed by the City of Richmond, giving the public access to the shoreline and the ability to connect to the Park via foot or bicycle. -
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Mayor and Members of the City Council: This is the weekly report for the week ending December 4, 2015. 1. Meeting Notes The next City Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 15th. Enjoy the night off next Tuesday. 2. Social Impact Bonds to Rehabilitate Richmond Properties As you will recall, the City of Richmond has partnered with the Richmond Community Foundation on an ambitious program to fund the rehabilitation of dilapidated housing in Richmond through the issuance of Social Impact Bonds. On November 20th, the bond issue closed, and the Richmond Community Foundation received $3 million to implement this program. The Social Impact Bonds were purchased by Mechanics Bank, making a significant investment in the Richmond community. In addition, the City’s financing team, including legal services from Orrick and Schiff Hardin, and financial services from RBC and Backstrom, McCarley & Berry, all contributed a significant amount of time at no cost to the City. City staff members in the Finance Department, the City Attorney’s office, Code Enforcement, and the City Manager’s office, all contributed as well. The Richmond Community Foundation has assembled an outstanding group of professionals to implement the program, including local real estate agents, Turner Construction, First American Title, the Home Depot and others to help make the program work. The Foundation is also partnering with SparkPoint Contra Costa to make rehabilitated homes available to first time homebuyers. All of these individuals and organizations deserve a great deal of credit for pulling this together. However, I especially want to acknowledge Richmond “favorite son” John Knox, with the Orrick law firm, for making this happen. -
RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft Prepared for WETA San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority Pier 9, Suite 111 The Embarcadero San Francisco, CA 94111 Prepared by Atkins 322 Pine Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 May 2014 Draft Contents May 2014 Contents SECTION 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 I. Purpose of this Document........................................................................................ 1 II. Purpose and Need of the Project ............................................................................ 1 III. Project Background ................................................................................................... 3 IV. Scope of this Document ........................................................................................... 4 V. Impact Terminology .................................................................................................. 7 VI. Organization of this Document ............................................................................... 8 VII. Summary of Environmental Impacts ...................................................................... 8 SECTION 2. Project Description ............................................................................................ 17 I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 17 II. Project -
Vol. XXVI No. I June/July/August, 2007 $3.00 Washington School—Then and Now
www.PointRichmondHistory.org Vol. XXVI No. I June/July/August, 2007 $3.00 Washington School—Then and Now Above, old Washington School in late 1920’s, (0578-from William Thompson; restored by Thomas Mercer-Husrh) Below, similar view taken June 17, 2007 by Thomas Mercer-Hursh. FROM THE Contents of this Issue From the President 1 PRESIDENT Members 2 By Mid Dornan Editor’s Notes 3 A-Mid Trivia 4 Thanks to a congenial board, this job’s Church News 5 easier. Thank you for entrusting me with the job for another year. Without our Editor Gary Women’s Westside 10 Shows, this newsletter would not be! The Point Richmond History Association Archive Photo Gallery 12 is proud to be a part of preserving this unique Point community that attracts its residents and Masquer’s Review, “Ring Round The 14 Moon” businesses. We are especially excited about the Mechanics Bank move into the historic William L. Thompson, MD 16 Trainmaster building. More Memories of Old Point Richmond, Thus, I would like to quote Executive East Richmond Avenue Director Don Bastion from the Richmond Museum Association Spring Newsletter, The WWII Pork Chops 18 Mirror. Welcome Mechanics Bank 19 It is no accident that “THE POINT” is one of the most pleasant areas in our city. It is the Annual Meeting Report 20 one area of town that has literally preserved Cards, Letters & E Mail 22 almost every original building within its limits. That is the key to its success, both Birthdays 23 economic and aesthetic. The lesson here is Calendar 24 that preservation makes economic sense....Our historic places help define our communities and build a strong sense of community. -
Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals a Report of Habitat Recommendations
Baylands Ecosystem Baylands Ecosystem Teams of Bay Area environmental scientists have assessed abitat Goals the past and present conditions of the baylands ecosystem and recommended ways to improve its ecological health. This report presents the Baylands Ecosystem Goals. Habitat Goals Habitat Goals H A Report of Habitat Recommendations Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project Db Deep Bay/Channel Basic Baylands Facts Sb Shallow Bay/Channel The baylands exist around the Bay between the lines of high and Tf Tidal Flat low tide. They are the lands touched by the tides, plus the lands that Tm Tidal Marsh the tides would touch in the absence of any levees or other unnat- Tp Tidal Marsh Pan ural structures. Lg Lagoon There are 73,000 acres of tidal baylands and 139,000 acres of diked Bc Beach/Dune baylands. Ag Agricultural Bayland There used to be 23 miles of sandy beaches. Now there are about Dw Diked Wetland seven miles of beaches. Most of the present beaches occur in differ- Sp Salt Pond ent locations than the historical beaches. St Storage or Treatment Pond There used to be 190,000 acres of tidal marsh with 6,000 miles of Uf Undeveloped Bay Fill channels and 8,000 acres of shallow pans. Now there are 40,000 Df Developed Bay Fill acres of tidal marsh with about 1,000 miles of channels and 250 Pr Perennial Pond acres of pans. Rw Riparian Forest/Willow Grove Only 16,000 acres of the historical tidal marsh remain. The rest of Mg Moist Grassland the present tidal marsh has naturally evolved from tidal flat, been Gr Grassland/Vernal Pool Complex restored from diked baylands, or muted by water control structures. -
XXX-5, April/May, 2012 Point Richmond History Association
www.PointRichmondHistory.org Vol. XXX No. 5 April/May/March, 2012 $3.00 Point Richmond History Association Save the Date! May 20, 2012 PRHA Annual Meeting Election of Officers We will help celebrate Washington School’s Centennial and Present an update on our “Windows to the Past” plaque program Point Richmond Community Center 139 Washington Avenue, Point Richmond Refreshments will be served. 2 THIS POINT…..in time Vol. XXX-5, April/May, 2012 Point Richmond History Association From the Contents of this Issue From the President 1 President Members 2 By Mid Dornan Editor’s Notes 3 At the annual meeting of the Point A-Mid Trivia 4 Richmond History Association on Sunday, May 20, 2:00 p.m. at the Point Richmond Church News 6 Community Center in the downtown Very Good News 10 Triangle, we will have a brief meeting to elect Out and About Town 12 officers for leadership in the coming year before our program. Photo Gallery 14 For the Program we are proud to help Point Richmond’s Churches 16 Washington School celebrate its Centennial Masquer’s Playhouse Review 18 in the coming year and invite all former students and teachers to attend. We have and This Day in KP History 18 continue to collect class photos from the past Cards, Letters and Email 24 hundred years. We need your stories and 90’s Club 25 memories. The Centennial Celebration began when the current PTA and teachers in March Birthdays 26 hosted a Centennial Tea to honor the school's Deaths 27 Past Presidents and learned of their many accomplishments. -
3.9 Land Use and Planning
3.9 Land Use and Planning 3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This section describes the existing land uses occurring on the project site and vicinity, as well as the various relevant land use plans and policies that regulate development in the area. The general and site- specific discussion of land use contained herein provides the environmental baseline by which environmental impacts are identified and measured. Environmental impacts are discussed in Section 4.0. 3.9.1 REGULATORY SETTING FEDERAL Coastal Zone Management Act The nation’s coastal resources are protected by the federal Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), which is administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and in California by the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission). The Coastal Commission carries out its “federal consistency” responsibilities by reviewing federal projects much like it does permit applications (California Coastal Commission, 2007). However, the commission cannot require federal agencies to submit permit applications nor impose conditions in its federal consistency decision. The terrestrial coastal zone “varies in width from several hundred feet in highly urbanized areas up to five miles in certain rural areas, and offshore the coastal zone includes a three-mile-wide band of ocean (California Coastal Commission, 2007).” Furthermore, the coastal zone “does not include San Francisco Bay, where development is regulated by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission” (California Coastal Commission, 2007). The role of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) is discussed below. STATE San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission As discussed in Section 3.5, the BCDC is charged with the maintenance and implementation of the McAteer-Petris Act.