October 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2016 OS15081_16MTA_board_action _MTA Board Action covers 11/3/15 1:13 PM Page 9 October 2016 MTA Board Action Items MTA Board Meeting 2 Broadway - 20th Floor Board Room New York, N.Y. 10004 Friday, 10/28/2016 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MTA Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 MTAHQ Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 4 NYCT/MaBSTOA/SIR/Bus Company Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 NYCTA Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 9 MTA Metro-North Railroad Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 METRO-NORTH Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 12 MTA Long Island Rail Road Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 LIRR Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 17 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 TBTA Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 24 MTA Capital Construction Regular Board Minutes - September 27, 2016 MTACC Minutes - September 28, 2016 - Page 28 3. COMMITTEE ON FINANCE Procurements Report MTAHQ Procurement Report - Page 31 i. Non-Competitive (no items) ii. Competitive MTAHQ Competitive Procurements - Page 33 iii. Ratifications MTAHQ Ratifications - Page 44 Real Estate Items i. Real Estate Agenda and Staff Summaries Real Estate Agenda and Staff Summaries - Page 47 4. COMMITTEE ON NYCT & BUS Procurements NYCT October Procurement Staff Summary and Resolution - Page 57 i. Non-Competitive NYCT Non-Competitive Actions - Page 61 ii. Competitive NYCT, MTACC Competitive Actions - Page 63 iii. Ratifications (no items) 5. COMMITTEE ON METRO-NORTH RAILROAD & LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD Action Item i. Lease of Wireless Spectrum to NJ Transit in Support of PTC Staff Summary - Lease of Wireless Spectrum to NJT in Support of PTC - Page 68 MNR Procurements Report MNR Procurements - Page 70 i. Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 74 ii. Competitive (no items) iii. Ratification (no items) LIRR Procurements Report LIRR Procurements - Page 79 i. Non-Competitive (no items) ii. Competitive LIRR Competitive Procurements - Page 83 iii. Ratification (no items) MTACC Procurements Report (no items) 6. COMMITTEE ON MTA BRIDGES & TUNNELS OPERATIONS Action Item i. Open Road Tolling - Environmental Determination BT Open Road Tolling - Environmental Determination - Page 91 ii. Toll Collection at Eight Facilities of MTA Bridges and Tunnels BT Toll Collection at Eight Facilities of MTA Bridges and Tunnels - Page 95 iii. Toll Violation Enforcement BT Toll Violation Enforcement - Page 100 Procurements BT Procurement - Page 108 i. Non-Competitive (no items) ii. Competitive BT Competitive - Page 111 iii. Ratifications (no items) 7. FIRST MUTUAL TRANSPORTATION ASSURANCE CO (FMTAC) (no items) Date of next meeting: November 16, 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Minutes of Regular Board Meeting 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:00 a.m. The following members were present: Hon. Thomas F. Prendergast, Chairman & CEO Hon. Fernando Ferrer, Vice Chairman Hon. David Jones Hon. Susan Metzger Hon. Charles G. Moerdler Hon. John J. Molloy Hon. Mitchell H. Pally Hon. Veronica Vanterpool Hon. James Vitiello Hon. Peter Ward Hon. Carl V. Wortendyke Hon. Neal Zuckerman The following members were absent: Hon. John Samuelson Hon. Andrew Saul Hon. Lawrence Schwartz Hon. Polly Trottenberg Donna Evans, Chief of Staff, Jerome F. Page, General Counsel, Board Member Andrew Albert, Board Member Ira Greenberg, Board Member Vincent Tessitore, Veronique Hakim, President, NYCTA, Patrick Nowakowski, President, Long Island Rail Road, Joseph J. Giulietti, President, Metro-North Railroad, Donald Spero, President, TBTA, Craig Cipriano, Executive V.P., Business Strategies and Operations Support, MTA Bus Company, Michael Horodniceanu, President, MTA Capital Construction, and Stephen Morello, Counselor to the Chairman, also attended the meeting. The Board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority also met as the Board of the New York City Transit Authority, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, the Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the Long Island Rail Road, the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, the MTA Capital Construction Company, the MTA Bus Company, and the First Mutual Transportation Assurance Company. Unless otherwise indicated, these minutes reflect items on the agenda of the Board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, and the First ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 4 of 121 - MTA Board Meeting 10/28/2016 Mutual Transportation Assurance Company. Refer to the other agencies’ minutes of this date for items on the agendas of the Boards of the other agencies. Chairman Prendergast noted the passing of Robert Kiley, MTA’s fifth Chairman, and he commented on Mr. Kiley’s accomplishments during his tenure as MTA Chairman. The Chairman extended condolences to the Kiley family and asked for a moment of silence in honor of Mr. Kiley. 1. PUBLIC SPEAKERS. There were five (5) public speakers, none of which addressed items relative to the MTA agenda. Refer to the video recording of the meeting produced by the MTA and maintained in MTA records, and to the other agencies’ minutes of this date, for the names of the speakers and the content of speakers’ statements. 2. CHAIRMAN’S REMARKS. Chairman Prendergast noted that Governor Cuomo announced yesterday at the Better New York luncheon that New York State would be moving aggressively forward with the improvements to the new Pennsylvania Station/Farley Complex and new Moynihan Train Hall. The Chairman stated that the complex is used by some 600,000 people each day, and the MTA needs to do more to improve the customers’ experience in using the complex, especially between the areas of 7th and 8th Avenues. Chairman Prendergast thanked Governor Cuomo for his initiative and support on this project. Chairman Prendergast addressed Board members’ concern with respect to reports of significant adverse information, as it relates to certain procurements that the Board is asked to approve. The Chairman said that at some of the September Committee meetings the Board discussed the significant adverse information process and the need for a review of the process. Chairman Prendergast noted that there are three things the MTA asks the Board to weigh heavily on that are not within the purview of the CEO or the agency heads: procurement items, fare policy determinations, and service. The Chairman stated that the MTA needs to provide Board members with the information needed to make well-informed decisions on whether or not to award contracts. Chairman Prendergast directed the MTA Chief Financial Officer and the MTA General Counsel to work with the Chief Procurement Officers and the General Counsels at the agencies to review the process and report back to the Board to explain the process in greater detail, and to the extent necessary, offer any improvements or expansions to the process. Chairman Prendergast stated that he wants to ensure that the Board has the information it needs to make timely and well-informed decisions on procurements. Chairman Prendergast noted that there will be a discussion during the Finance Committee portion of the meeting relating to a procurement item involving Wells Fargo. 3. MINUTES. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board approved the minutes of the regular Board meeting held on July 27, 2016. Regular Board Meeting September 28, 2016 ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 5 of 121 - MTA Board Meeting 10/28/2016 4. COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. A. Action Items. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board approved the following action items. The specifics are set forth in the staff summaries filed with the meeting materials. With respect to item #1 below, the Board vote did not approve the inclusion of Wells Fargo in the pool of underwriters serving as senior managers. If Wells Fargo is determined to be a responsible vendor as a result of a responsibility review, the Board will be asked to consider the inclusion of Wells Fargo as senior manager in a future Board action. The details of Board members’ comments with respect thereto are included in the videotape of the meeting produced by the MTA and maintained in MTA records. Board Member Charles Moerdler recused himself from the vote on item #1 below. 1. Selection of Bond Underwriters. Approved the selection of firms, who qualified for underwriting assignments on MTA bond and note issues in connection with the MTA financed portion of approved capital programs, as well as for financing of special projects outside of approved capital programs, to serve as senior managers, senior co-managers, co-managers and selling group members. 2. Resolution to Authorize Execution, Filing and Acceptance of Federal Funds. Approved a resolution to authorize the filing of applications in request of Federal capital assistance for the balance of FFY 2016 and FFY 2017; authorize the Chairman/Chief Executive Officer or any of his designees to make required certifications; and authorize the acceptance of grants. B. Procurement Items. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board approved the following procurement items. The specifics are set forth in the staff summaries and documentation filed with the meeting materials. 1. Intergraph Corporation – Software Maintenance – No. 10185-0100, S/A #3. Approved
Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund and Rotary Co-Fund Research on Women And
    QUARTERLY REPORT: 3RD QUARTER 2016 Q3 2016 INSIDE THIS REPORT Milestone Research Year Cure Alzheimer’s Fund and 3 Do You Remember? Rotary Co-Fund Research 3 on Women and Alzheimer’s CaringKind Support 3 Cure Alzheimer’s Fund and Rotary joined forces this fall to fund research Not Your Average Night into why women are more likely to get Alzheimer’s disease than men. at Yankee Stadium The two organizations granted a total of $375,000 to the lab of Rudy 4 Tanzi, Ph.D., at Massachusetts General Hospital. Tanzi, who serves as Women Against Alzheimer’s the Research Consortium chair for Cure Alzheimer’s Fund, will analyze 4 existing databases of Alzheimer’s family genomes to identify gene Remembering Bob Kiley variants that impact risk differently for women than for men. 4 The Alzheimer’s Women and Alzheimer’s Reading Room Of the 5.4 million Americans living with Alzheimer’s disease, nearly two-thirds are women. While researchers and clinicians have observed this phenomenon for some 4 time, the reasons why incidence among women is greater are unknown, and little Cure Alzheimer’s Fund research has been done to determine possible genetic underpinnings. Women do Heroes have a longer expected lifespan than men, but this difference alone does not explain the observed imbalance in incidence of the disease. At age 65, women face twice the 5 & 6 lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer’s than men. At 75, their risk is nearly threefold. State of the Mind Women also exhibit faster cognitive decline than do men. In one study, women with 8 mild cognitive impairment, a diagnosis that often precedes Alzheimer’s, increased their rate of cognitive errors faster than did their male counterparts when tested over several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ppps Transport for London (Tfl) Originally Set up Nearly One Quarter of the UK’S Entire PPP Programme
    1. Case studies 1.1. Case study: London Transport – the economic advantages of re-municipalising PPPs Transport for London (TfL) originally set up nearly one quarter of the UK’s entire PPP programme. Nearly all of these PPPs have now been terminated. Between 1996 and 2005 ten PPPs were set up for various developments of the underground and light rail public transport systems in London. The three largest PPPs were set up in 2003, for the renovation and maintenance of the entire London underground railway system. These were awarded to two large private consortia, Metronet and Tubelines, under PPP contracts worth over £17 billion (USD $26 billion). TfL and the government guaranteed 95 per cent of all the debt raised by the consortia to finance the PPPs. These PPPs were set up despite strong opposition from the elected London mayor and assembly and their professional advisers, who wanted the work to be done by direct labour, financed by issuing bonds. The first terminations happened in 2007 following the collapse of Metronet, which held two of the PPP contracts. Metronet was unable to manage the work within the amount budgeted in the PPP, and ran up a deficit of over £1 billion. TfL refused to provide an extra subsidy to cover this loss, and Metronet went bankrupt, although its shareholders had already received generous dividends. The overall cost to the taxpayer of this collapse was estimated at between £170 million and £410 million. The final report on the PPP stated, “The legacy left by Metronet’s former shareholders was one of poor programme management and system integration, ineffective cost control, a lack of forward planning and inefficient fiscal management.”1 The UK parliament’s Transport Committee summarized the lessons in a series of damning statements: “It is difficult to lend any credence to the assertion that the Metronet PPP contracts were effective in transferring risk from the public to the private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Civil Service Commission. 18
    THE CITY RECORD. PRICE 10 CENTS. VOL LV. NUMBER 16467. NEW YORK, MONDAY, JULY 25, 1927. Title Division- THE CITY RECORD. 1. Silverman, Henry, Room 1531, Municipal Building, 81.36. 2. Handel, Samuel K., 227 Audubon ave., 75.79. Bureau of Street Openings, Main Office, Manhattan- OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. 1. Dunn, Joseph J., 1652 University ave., Bronx, 78.91. Published Under Authority of Section 1526, Greater New York Charter, by the BOARD OF CITY RECORD. Promotion to Hospital Clerk, Grade 3, Department of Health. JAMES J. WALKER, MAYOR. 1. White, Harry A., 519 E. 138th st., Bronx, 87.85. CHARLES W. BERRY, COMPTROLLER. GEORGE P. NICHOLSON, CORPORATION COUNSEL. Promotion to Playleader, Grade 2 (Female), Department of Parks, Brooklyn. STEPHEN G. KELLEY, SUPERVISOR. 1. Oblas, Lillie, 1177 E. 14th st., Bklyn., 89.33. 2. Smith, Mildred W., 2106 Tomlinson ave., Bronx, 86.75. Supervisor's Office, Municipal Building, Manhattan, 8th floor. 3. Brewer, Marie T., 18 Berry court, Gerrittsen Beach, Bklyn., 86.41. Distributing Division, 125 and 127 Worth st., Manhattan, New York City. 4. Courtney, Grace A., 3830 18th ave., Bklyn., 84.12. Published daily, at 9 a, m., except Sundays and legal holidays. 83.41. Subscription, $20 a year, exclusive of supplements. Daily issue, 10 cents a copy. 5. Foley, Josephine M., 217-19 110th ave., Queens Village, L. I., SUPPLEMENTS: Civil List (containing names, salaries, etc., of the City employees), $5; Official Canvass of Votes, $1; Registry Lists, 20 cents each assembly district; Law Department Department of Parks, Brooklyn. Supplement, $1; Assessed Valuation of Real Estate, $2 each section; postage extra.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D.3 Scoping Report
    PUBLIC COMMENTS PC00001 LGA Comments <[email protected]> LaGuardia Airport Access Improvement Project Denise Crockett <[email protected]> Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:44 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Mr Andrew Brooks: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the LaGuardia Airport Access Improvement Project. As a long term resident of Jamaica, NY, residing along the Grand Central Parkway, I do believe that there is a great need for these proposed improvements. Connecting the LaGuardia Airport to the LIRR and NYCT No. 7 Line is a great idea, but it does not go far enough! Both of these proposed connections are Manhattan centric, that is supporting more ridership between the Airport and the City. This does absolutely nothing to relieve or ease local traffic congestion we experience in Queens on the Long Island Expressway and the Grand Central Parkway with inbound and outbound Long Island traffic. It also does not reduce heavy traffic congestion on the Van Wyck Expressway between JKF and LaGuardia. It would be helpful if the proposed plan included plans to extend the Airtrain light rail service Train which ends at the Jamaica LIRR Station to LaGuardia Airport with a stop at the NYCT No 7 Line. Having lived here for over 40 years and having travelled extensively on business out of both airports, I believe that extending the Airtrain from the Jamaica Station to LaGuardia Airport would be a tremendous improvement and provide many more benefits for the greater NYC area. People traveling from Long Island
    [Show full text]
  • Pou Piblikasyon Imedya: 06/02/2017 GOUVÈNÈ ANDREW M
    Pou Piblikasyon Imedya: 06/02/2017 GOUVÈNÈ ANDREW M. CUOMO Eta New York | Chanm Ekzekitif Andrew M. Cuomo | Gouvènè GOUVÈNÈ CUOMO ANONSE PORT AUTHORITY PRAN PWOCHEN ETAP ENPÒTAN POU AIRTRAIN LAGUARDIA A Port Authority Pibliye Demann Pwopozisyon Planifikasyon ak Enjeniri AirTrain LaGuardia a; Antrepriz Espesyalize yo Chwazi a pral Mennen Pwosesis Enjeniri Preliminè pou Pwojè AirTrain lan Analiz Enjeniri yo pral Kouvri Estasyon AirTrain lan yo nan LaGuardia ak nan Willets Point ansanm ak ki Tren ki gen “Dwa Pasaj” Port Authority ak MTA pral Kowòpere ansanm pou yo Konstwi yon Nouvo Konplèks Estasyon nan Willets Point ki gen Transfè Fasil ant tren LIRR la, 7 Liy Subway yo, ak AirTrain lan Etid la Pral Evalye Agrandisman Pakin ak Lokasyon Machin Santralize nan Nouvo Sant Willets Point lan Jodi a, Gouvènè Andrew M. Cuomo te anonse Port Authority te pibliye yon Demann Pwopozisyon pou travay enjeniri ak planifikasyon preliminè pou nouvo koneksyon AirTrain anvè Ayewopò LaGuardia a. Travay antrepriz espesyalize a pral reprezante yon pwochen etap enpòtan nan avansman pwojè AirTrain Ayewopò LaGuardia a. Demann Pwopozisyon yo (Request for Proposals, RFP) ouvè pou tout antrepriz ki kalifye yo epi yo atann repons nan yon dèle kat semèn. Avan 2030, yo atann pou kantite pasaje nan LaGuardia ogmante rive plis pase 6 milyon pasaje chak ane epi AirTrain se yon pilye enpòtan nan estrateji ayewopò a genyen pou l akomode kwasans sa a. Gouvènè Cuomo te di, “Anpil milyon pasaje ki vwayaje atravè LaGuardia chak ane yo merite yon opsyon transpò komen ki pratik ak fyab ki konekte sant transpò kle yo ak kè Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2005 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2005 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 48, No. 2 February, 2005 The Bulletin MYRTLE AVENUE “L” STRUCTURE Published by the New York Division, Electric IS 90 YEARS OLD Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Trains started running on the new elevated private right-of-way on the surface from Wy- 3001, New York, New structure between Wyckoff Avenue and Fresh ckoff Avenue to Metropolitan Avenue. Electric York 10008-3001. Pond Road and the new ramp east of there operation began in August, 1895, probably 90 years ago, February 22, 1915. with trolley cars. A year later, August 20, For general inquiries, This line has an interesting history. On July 1896, Flushing-Ridgewood trolley cars were contact us at nydiv@ 20, 1889, trains started operating from also operated on this right-of-way. electricrailroaders.org or by phone at (212) 986- Broadway to Wyckoff Avenue on a two-track On October 1, 1906, the ramp at Wyckoff 4482 (voice mail structure with island platforms at Broadway, Avenue connecting the elevated tracks with available). ERA’s Evergreen Avenue, Central Avenue, Knicker- the trolley tracks was placed in service. Myr- website is bocker Avenue, and Wyckoff Avenue. A con- tle Avenue “L” service was extended to Met- www.electricrailroaders. org. tract delivered on July 22, 1914 provided for ropolitan Avenue on the existing right-of-way. the rebuilding of the above stations. Side All elevated trains were equipped with trolley Editorial Staff: platforms were built at Central Avenue and poles, which made contact with the trolley Editor-in-Chief: Knickerbocker Avenue, an express station wire when the trains ran on the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 7 July Review Committee
    cover2.qxd 5/26/06 3:41 pm Page 1 Report of the 7 July Review Committee - Volume 2 Volume - Committee Report of the 7 July Review Report of the 7 July Review Committee Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 June 2006 Minicom 020 7983 4458 LA/May 06/SD D&P Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Contents Page Transcript of hearing on 3 November 2005 3 Transport for London, Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service Transcript of hearing on 1 December 2005 Telecommunications companies: BT, O2, Vodafone, Cable & Wireless 61 Communication with businesses: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry 90 and Metropolitan Police Service Transcript of hearing on 11 January 2006 Local authorities: Croydon Council (Local Authority Gold on 7 July), Camden 109 Council, Tower Hamlets Council and Westminster City Council Health Service: NHS London, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Great Ormond 122 Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital and Royal College of Nursing Media: Sky News, BBC News, BBC London, ITV News, LBC News & Heart 132 106.2, Capital Radio and London Media Emergency Forum, Evening Standard, The Times Transcript of hearing on 1 March 2006 147 Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Written submissions from organisations Metropolitan Police 167 City of London Police 175 London Fire Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly (Plenary) – 13 June 2007
    Appendix 3 London Assembly (Plenary) – 13 June 2007 Consultancy Agreement between Transport for London and Bob Kiley – Question and Answer Session with the Chair of the Transport for London Board Sally Hamwee (Chair): We now move to questions to the Mayor in his capacity as Chair of Transport for London. The lead off question from me is to ask you if you can tell us the purpose of the consultancy agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley, and how it offers value for money? Ken Livingstone (Mayor of London/Chair of the Transport for London Board): When Bob Kiley decided that he intended to retire, I was determined that we should retain his advice. He has, I think, certainly in the English speaking world, a reputation as being the most successful transport operator over a period of some decades, and the record he had in terms of turning round a pretty dysfunctional transport system in London speaks for itself. We were also coming up to the negotiations for the second tranche of the PPP (Public Private Partnership) contracts, and I certainly wished to have him advising us on that. We particularly wanted his continuing advice on the issue of Crossrail, but also just on day-to-day other issues. I think I have told the Assembly before that when I was getting wholly conflicting advice about the level of cost overruns that should be budgeted for in the Olympics, I could have commissioned Parsons Brinckerhoff or KPMG, no doubt, for tens if not hundreds of thousands of pounds to give advice.
    [Show full text]
  • On the 24Th November, Mr
    A3 THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND PLANNING POLICY – 15 DECEMBER 2003 REPORT BY THE DEPUTY LEADER AND CABINET MEMBER FOR PLANNING POLICY AND TRANSPORTATION CABINET MEMBER REPORT ON CURRENT ISSUES The following are matters of current and future business. I will not be present at the Committee meeting but officers can provide additional information on the night. FOR INFORMATION Since the last meeting: 1. CONGESTION CHARGE ZONE – PROPOSED EXTENSION 1.1 On 24 th November Mr Swinburne and I gave evidence to a meeting of the Greater London Authority’s Transport Committee, which was considering the Mayor of London’s proposed extension of the Congestion Charging Scheme. The Committee was reminded of the Council’s view that proposals to extend the zone to the west were premature and that if the scheme were extended it should include the entire Royal Borough. The Council believes that any proposed extension should only be considered as part of the planned major review of the Transport Strategy, taking into account wider issues such as the London Plan and the Mayor of London’s Air Quality Strategy. 1.2 The following arguments were also presented to the Transport Committee: • TfL have published no empirical research on the scheme’s impact on businesses. To have any credibility this must include the vital Christmas and New Year sales data, which are unlikely to be available until after the consultation period. • The current option merely replicates the solution produced for central London by TfL, who have adopted a one size fits all model regardless of the different circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Redevelopment Times Laguardia Airport Winter 2021
    REDEVELOPMENT TIMES LAGUARDIA AIRPORT WINTER 2021 Despite an unprecedented drop in travel volumes at LaGuardia Airport due to the Covid & the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 ended with a series of historic milestones that will help Community pave the way for a brighter future. Following the opening of the new LaGuardia Redevelopment Community Information Center at the end of 2019, we unveiled 2020 was a year of a beautiful new Arrivals and Departures Hall at Terminal B and the first phase of extraordinary achievements another new concourse. More than 50 percent of a Whole New LGA is now open. and milestones, but also But we continue to face challenges. The communities around the airport were the unprecedented challenges epicenter of the coronavirus, and our neighbors suffered from a health and an for the LaGuardia Airport economic crisis. Despite these daunting hurdles, the LGA Redevelopment team Redevelopment Program. remained committed to advancing the redevelopment program and maintaining its schedule, while also supporting local communities. 2020 Accomplishments Art in August Sustainability Mini Camp EXTENDED New Terminal B Virtual Events & Programs • 5,000 attendees joined Arrivals and our business development Although the community information center and workforce Departures Hall has been closed since March, the outreach development webinars team worked hard to shift all its activities Opening • 2 summer educational and events to a virtual setting. programs for the youth The most significant redevelopment milestone in 2020 was the opening of the new Terminal B Arrivals & Departures Hall. As the construction continued, the Port Authority, terminal developers, and the building trades unions implemented best-in-class COVID-19 safety protocols to keep the construction workers healthy Food & PPE Distribution COVID-19 Test Site and safe.
    [Show full text]