DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D.3 Scoping Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PUBLIC COMMENTS PC00001 LGA Comments <[email protected]> LaGuardia Airport Access Improvement Project Denise Crockett <[email protected]> Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:44 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Mr Andrew Brooks: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the LaGuardia Airport Access Improvement Project. As a long term resident of Jamaica, NY, residing along the Grand Central Parkway, I do believe that there is a great need for these proposed improvements. Connecting the LaGuardia Airport to the LIRR and NYCT No. 7 Line is a great idea, but it does not go far enough! Both of these proposed connections are Manhattan centric, that is supporting more ridership between the Airport and the City. This does absolutely nothing to relieve or ease local traffic congestion we experience in Queens on the Long Island Expressway and the Grand Central Parkway with inbound and outbound Long Island traffic. It also does not reduce heavy traffic congestion on the Van Wyck Expressway between JKF and LaGuardia. It would be helpful if the proposed plan included plans to extend the Airtrain light rail service Train which ends at the Jamaica LIRR Station to LaGuardia Airport with a stop at the NYCT No 7 Line. Having lived here for over 40 years and having travelled extensively on business out of both airports, I believe that extending the Airtrain from the Jamaica Station to LaGuardia Airport would be a tremendous improvement and provide many more benefits for the greater NYC area. People traveling from Long Island can take the train to the plane! Sincerely, Denise Crockett 164-20 Grand Central Parkway Jamaica, NY 11432 Sent from my iPad PC00002 LGA Comments <[email protected]> LaGuardia Airport Airport Access Improvement Project Derek Sokolowski <[email protected]> Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:39 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To Whom It May Concern: My name is Derek Sokolowski and I am writing this email to send some comments to the Port Authority regarding the people mover plan between LaGuardia Airport and Willet Points-Citified. I would like to say that this idea of having the station originate at the Mets-Willets Point stop on the Long Island Railroad is a terrible idea for the following reasons: 1. The stop is not on the main line of the LIRR. Surely the origin of the people mover should be located at a major artery of the LIRR as well as the MTA Subway. I propose the Woodside Station. It has the right of way as it can travel on the LIRR tracks, onto the BQE and follow the road to Laguardia Airport with minimum environmental impact 2. Anyone travelling from Long Island or any points east of the Main-Line Woodside station would have an issue having to switch between trains either at Woodside or travel into Penn Station/Grand Central. Therefore., starting the people mover from Woodside would save time for everyone without needing to switch between trains (especially for those with Accessibility issues). 3. The people mover station would be crowded on Game Days at the Citifield Stadium and during the US Open. 4. There is an issue with the construction of the people mover to go around the 7 train tracks. 5. Not enough bus to people mover connections will be present. Local busses should have it easier to transfer into the station. Thank you for your time to read through the comments. Sincerely, Derek Sokolowski Assistant Coordinator – PRISM Jr. Scholars Program Programs for Research Initiatives in Science and Math (PRISM) Adjunct Lecturer – Biology & Biochemistry – John Jay College of Criminal Justice 524 West 59th Street Room 5.61.00 NB New York, NY 10019 PC00002 Tel. (212) 887-6189 Fax. (212) 621-3739 City College of New York 2019 Masters of Science - Biotechnology John Jay College of Criminal Justice 2015 Bachelors of Science - Forensic Science – Concentration Molecular Biology PC00003 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Form Submission - Website Scoping Formal Comment Squarespace <[email protected]> Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:14 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Name: Wayne Coppock Email: [email protected] Organization: None Address 1: Address 2: City: State: Zip: Comment Topic: Please extend the NW subway line instead of another air train Formal Comment: Please do not build another air train. It's a wasteful and inefficient use of public funds. Extending the NW line from Astoria to LGA is a far better idea that will result in a one seat ride for many visitors and actually integrate into the subway system properly instead of the awful airtrain setup. (Sent via LGA Access Improvement Project EIS) PC00004 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Hello, regarding the LaGuardia proposal connection g mc 3 <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:19 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Hello, My name is George McCook and I've been a daily rider of the 7 train for over 15 years. When I heard that the powers that be are considering utilizing the 7 subway line to connect to LaGuardia, a small panic rang out in my head. First of all, the 7 train line is one of the most crowded lines in the system. During rush hour, there is hardly any room. Second, the train also has a tendency to break down and that could affect people attempting to catch a flight. Thirdly, the connection at 74th/Roosevelt already has a bus that goes to LaGuardia Airport. Lastly, with all the development in LIC, there will be even more people riding the 7 train in the near future, further straining that line's ability to fit everyone. My proposal: Why not use the N/W line to Astoria and extend towards LaGuardia? There is so much more room on the N/W going towards Astoria since they have the new model trains and there are simply less total train riders on that line than the 7 train. Plus there is room on 20th Ave to connect Astoria to LaGuardia. I feel very strongly about this issue and if you'd like to chat any more, please let me know. Thank you very much, George McCook PC00005 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Form Submission - Website Scoping Formal Comment Squarespace <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:36 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Name: David Gerson Email: [email protected] Organization: Address 1: 166-08 73 Ave Address 2: City: Fresh Meadows State: NY Zip: 11366 Comment Topic: Opposed to current plan Formal Comment: I oppose the current plan for the following reasons: -the Willets Point terminal would utilize either the 7 train or the LIRR Manhasset line limiting access to a small subset of Long Island passengers -the 7 line is an outdoor, elevated train with chronic service problems and difficulty dealing with adverse weather conditions. -the LIRR Manhasset line bypasses the Jamaica terminal limiting access to a small portion of Long Island residents. -this plan does not provide any means of passenger or employees from moving between LGA and JFK airports. I believe a better option would be to direct the LGA AirTrain to the existing terminal at Jamaica. This provides many benefits, inckudibg: -utilizing the E and J subways that are more reliable and less subject to weather disturbances. -accessing the existing Jamaica terminal allows access to the vast majority of Long Island residents -provides a tradeoff between the additional cost of a longer route with the savings of utilizing existing infrastructure. -provides a means of passengers and employees to travel between LGA and JFK airports alliwing passengers additional options when booking flights. I believe the net benefits from this proposal more than offsets the additional cosr of a longer route from LGA. (Sent via LGA Access Improvement Project EIS) PC00006 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Form Submission - Website Scoping Formal Comment Squarespace <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:10 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Name: Julio Rosique Email: [email protected] Organization: Ditmars Blvd. Block Association Address 1: 106-65 Ditmars Blvd Address 2: City: East Elmhurst State: NY Zip: 11369 Comment Topic: AirTrain Formal Comment: My concern is about the vibration of the train is going to affect the foundation of the home and make it dangerous to live in and possibly lower the value of the home. The noise from the construction as well as the noise from the train will be added to what is already going on. (Sent via LGA Access Improvement Project EIS) PC00007 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Form Submission - Website Scoping Formal Comment Squarespace <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:13 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Name: Mark Jenkins Email: [email protected] Organization: Ditmars Blvd. Block Association Address 1: 106-36 Ditmars Blvd. Address 2: City: East Elmhurst State: NY Zip: 11369 Comment Topic: AirTrain Formal Comment: I believe that a better alternative will be a ferry service or a designated bus service. Having to go past the airport to Willets Point and back to the airport doesn't make any sense. (Sent via LGA Access Improvement Project EIS) PC00008 LGA Comments <[email protected]> Form Submission - Website Scoping Formal Comment Squarespace <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:16 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Name: Junetta Smith Email: [email protected] Organization: Address 1: Address 2: City: State: Zip: Comment Topic: Formal Comment: The AirTram would be an obstruction and I object to it be built.
Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX R.10 List of Recipients for Draft EIS

    APPENDIX R.10 List of Recipients for Draft EIS

    APPENDIX R.10 List of Recipients for Draft EIS LGA Access Improvement Project EIS August 2020 List of Recipients for Draft EIS Stakeholder category Affiliation Full Name District 19 Paul Vallone District 20 Peter Koo Local Officials District 21 Francisco Moya District 22 Costa Constantinides District 25 Daniel Dromm New York State Andrew M. Cuomo United States Senate Chuck E. Schumer United States Senate Kirsten Gillibrand New York City Bill de Blasio State Senate District 11 John C. Liu State Senate District 12 Michael Gianaris State Senate District 13 Jessica Ramos State Senate District 13 Maria Barlis State Senate District 16 Toby Ann Stavisky State Senate District 34 Alessandra Biaggi State Elected Officials New York State Assembly District 27 Daniel Rosenthal New York State Assembly District 34 Michael G. DenDekker New York State Assembly District 35 Jeffrion L. Aubry New York State Assembly District 35 Lily Pioche New York State Assembly District 36 Aravella Simotas New York State Assembly District 39 Catalina Cruz Borough of Queens Melinda Katz NY's 8th Congressional District (Brooklyn and Queens) in the US House Hakeem Jeffries New York District 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez New York 35th Assembly District Hiram Montserrate NYS Laborers Vinny Albanese NYS Laborers Steven D' Amato Global Business Travel Association Patrick Algyer Queens Community Board 7 Charles Apelian Hudson Yards Hells Kitchen Alliance Robert Benfatto Bryant Park Corporation Dan Biederman Bryant Park Corporation - Citi Field Dan Biederman Garment District Alliance
  • Long Island City, Queens

    Long Island City, Queens

    Long Island City, Queens OPEN SPACE INDEX LONG ISLAND CITY, QUEENS OPEN SPACE INDEX ❁ 1 LONG ISLAND CITY n NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 16 McKenna Triangle (1 to 20 acres in size) 17 Old Hickory Playground Long Island City Study Area 3 Dutch Kills Green 18 Playground Thirty Five XXXV n East River and Newtown Creek 4 Dutch Kills Playground 19 Rafferty Triangle MTA 7 Subway 5 Gantry Plaza State Park 20 Sixteen Oaks Grove MTA N, Q, R, W Subways 6 Murray Playground 21 Short Triangle MTA B, D, F, M Subways 7 Rainey Park 22 Spirit Playground MTA A, C, E Subways 8 Ravenswood Playground 23 Vernon Mall MTA G Subway 9 Socrates Sculpture Park 10 Torsney Playground (Lou Lodati Park) n COMMUNITY GARDENS n NEW YORK CITY HOUSING 24 Windmill Community Garden AUTHORITY DEVELOPMENTS n POCKET PARKS 25 Long Island City Community Garden (Less than 1 acre) 26 Long Island City Roots Community Garden 11 A.R.R.O.W. Field House n LARGE PARKS 27 Smiling Hogshead Ranch (More than 20 acres) 12 Andrews Grove 1 Hunter’s Point South Park 13 Bridge and Tunnel Park 2 Queensbridge Park & 14 Court Square Park Queensbridge Baby Park 15 Gordon Triangle ASTORIA HOUSES 9 MANHATTAN QUEENS 33 7 RD 34 AVE 33 AVE 35 AVE 8 1 ST 1 RAVENSWOOD BROADWAY 22 HOUSES 9 ST 12 ST 28 ST 10 ST 37 29 ST 32 ST 13 ST 20 AVE 30 ST ST 4 35 37 ST QUEENSBRIDGE HOUSES ST 2 21 ST 45 ST WOODSIDE NORTH 22 ST 23 ST 24 ST 36 38 ST HOUSES QUEENSBRIDGE HOUSES 11 41 ST 44 ST 40 42 ST 43 ST QUEENSBOROSOUTH BRIDGE A CRESCENT ST 31 ST 34 ST VE 39 33 ST 18 VD AVE WOODSIDE AVE 2 41 AVE THERN BL 24 NOR 43 48 ST AVE VERNON BLVD VE 10 ST 37 A BARNETT AVE L 44 3 P AVE 1 1 44 RD SUNNYSIDE YARDS 15 44 DR 19 6 10 46 AVE 16 14 5 5 46 RD 21 SKILLMAN AVE43 AVE 47 AVE THOMSON AVE 5 ST 5 QUEENS BLVD 50 47 AVE ST AVE 25 26 31 51 AVE 12 27 1 49 23 AVE 27 ST 17 13 LONG ISLAND BORDEN 51 2 ST AVE 1 AVE EXPRESSWAY 1/4 Mile 2 ✿ NEW YORKERS FOR PARKS Long Island City Long Island City (LIC) is a Queens waterfront neighborhood that evolved from an industrial hub to a booming business and residential center.
  • Pou Piblikasyon Imedya: 06/02/2017 GOUVÈNÈ ANDREW M

    Pou Piblikasyon Imedya: 06/02/2017 GOUVÈNÈ ANDREW M

    Pou Piblikasyon Imedya: 06/02/2017 GOUVÈNÈ ANDREW M. CUOMO Eta New York | Chanm Ekzekitif Andrew M. Cuomo | Gouvènè GOUVÈNÈ CUOMO ANONSE PORT AUTHORITY PRAN PWOCHEN ETAP ENPÒTAN POU AIRTRAIN LAGUARDIA A Port Authority Pibliye Demann Pwopozisyon Planifikasyon ak Enjeniri AirTrain LaGuardia a; Antrepriz Espesyalize yo Chwazi a pral Mennen Pwosesis Enjeniri Preliminè pou Pwojè AirTrain lan Analiz Enjeniri yo pral Kouvri Estasyon AirTrain lan yo nan LaGuardia ak nan Willets Point ansanm ak ki Tren ki gen “Dwa Pasaj” Port Authority ak MTA pral Kowòpere ansanm pou yo Konstwi yon Nouvo Konplèks Estasyon nan Willets Point ki gen Transfè Fasil ant tren LIRR la, 7 Liy Subway yo, ak AirTrain lan Etid la Pral Evalye Agrandisman Pakin ak Lokasyon Machin Santralize nan Nouvo Sant Willets Point lan Jodi a, Gouvènè Andrew M. Cuomo te anonse Port Authority te pibliye yon Demann Pwopozisyon pou travay enjeniri ak planifikasyon preliminè pou nouvo koneksyon AirTrain anvè Ayewopò LaGuardia a. Travay antrepriz espesyalize a pral reprezante yon pwochen etap enpòtan nan avansman pwojè AirTrain Ayewopò LaGuardia a. Demann Pwopozisyon yo (Request for Proposals, RFP) ouvè pou tout antrepriz ki kalifye yo epi yo atann repons nan yon dèle kat semèn. Avan 2030, yo atann pou kantite pasaje nan LaGuardia ogmante rive plis pase 6 milyon pasaje chak ane epi AirTrain se yon pilye enpòtan nan estrateji ayewopò a genyen pou l akomode kwasans sa a. Gouvènè Cuomo te di, “Anpil milyon pasaje ki vwayaje atravè LaGuardia chak ane yo merite yon opsyon transpò komen ki pratik ak fyab ki konekte sant transpò kle yo ak kè Manhattan.
  • NYCAR Membership

    NYCAR Membership

    NYCAR Membership LGA COMMITTEE JFK COMMITTEE U.S. House of Representatives # of Votes U.S. House of Representatives # of Votes US Congressional District 3 1 US Congressional District 3 1 US Congressional District 6 1 US Congressional District 4 1 US Congressional District 8 1 US Congressional District 5 1 US Congressional District 12 1 US Congressional District 5 1 US Congressional District 14 1 Queens Borough President # of Votes Queens Borough President # of Votes Queens Borough President 1 Queens Borough President 1 Queens Borough President 1 Queens Borough President 1 New York State Senate # of Votes New York State Senate # of Votes NYS Senate District 7 1 NYS Senate District 2 1 NYS Senate District 6 1 NYS Senate District 11 1 NYS Senate District 9 1 NYS Senate District 13 1 NYS Senate District 10 1 NYS Senate District 16 1 NYS Senate District 14 1 NYS Senate District 18 1 NYS Senate District 15 1 New York State Assembly # of Votes New York State Assembly # of Votes NYS Assembly District 26 1 NYS Assembly District 19 1 NYS Assembly District 27 1 NYS Assembly District 20 1 NYS Assembly District 34 1 NYS Assembly District 22 1 NYS Assembly District 35 1 NYS Assembly District 23 1 NYS Assembly District 36 1 NYS Assembly District 29 1 NYS Assembly District 40 1 NYS Assembly District 31 1 NYS Assembly District 85 1 NYS Assembly District 32 1 New York City Council # of Votes NYS Assembly District 33 1 NYC Council District 8 1 New York City Council # of Votes NYC Council District 19 1 NYC Council District 27 1 NYC Council District 20 1
  • Tracking Vision Zero in Queens

    Tracking Vision Zero in Queens

    Tracking Vision Zero in Queens Queens (Borough-Wide) August 2017 Are we bending the curve downward on traffic injuries? Traffic Injuries & Fatalities in Previous 12 Months Total Traffic Fatalities in Previous 12 Months 20,000 120 18,000 16,000 100 14,000 12,000 80 10,000 8,000 60 6,000 4,000 40 2,000 Injuries Injuries &Fatalities 20 Previous 12 Months 0 2013 0 Pedestrians Cyclists Motorists & Passengers 2013 Are we increasing enforcement of traffic laws? Quick Facts Past 12 Change vs. Change vs. Tickets Issued in Previous 12 Months This Month Months Prev. Year 2013 2013 60,000 Injuries Pedestrians 168 2,636 + 1% 2,801 - 6% 50,000 Cyclists 90 933 + 8% 826 + 13% 40,000 Motorists and Passengers 1,303 14,298 + 4% 11,895 + 20% Total 1,561 17,867 + 3% 15,522 + 15% 30,000 Fatalities Tickets Pedestrians 3 32 - 6% 52 - 38% 20,000 Cyclists 0 2 - 33% 2 0% Motorists and Passengers 3 21 - 40% 39 - 46% 10,000 Total 6 55 - 24% 93 - 41% Tickets Issued 0 Illegal Cell Phone Use 1,240 14,876 - 2% 26,967 - 45% Disobeying Red Signal 892 11,872 + 14% 7,538 + 57% Not Giving Rt of Way to Ped 754 10,548 + 29% 3,647 + 189% Speeding 961 15,424 + 33% 7,132 + 116% Speeding Not Giving Way to Pedestrians Total 3,847 52,720 + 16% 45,284 + 16% Disobeying Red Signal Illegal Cell Phone Use 2013 Tracking Vision Zero Bronx August 2017 Are we bending the curve downward on traffic injuries? Traffic Injuries & Fatalities in Previous 12 Months Total Traffic Fatalities in Previous 12 Months 12,000 70 10,000 60 8,000 50 6,000 40 4,000 30 20 2,000 Previous 12 Months Injuries Injuries &Fatalities 0 10 2013 0 Pedestrians Cyclists Motorists & Passengers 2013 Are we increasing enforcement of traffic laws? Quick Facts Past 12 Change vs.
  • Redevelopment Times Laguardia Airport Winter 2021

    Redevelopment Times Laguardia Airport Winter 2021

    REDEVELOPMENT TIMES LAGUARDIA AIRPORT WINTER 2021 Despite an unprecedented drop in travel volumes at LaGuardia Airport due to the Covid & the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 ended with a series of historic milestones that will help Community pave the way for a brighter future. Following the opening of the new LaGuardia Redevelopment Community Information Center at the end of 2019, we unveiled 2020 was a year of a beautiful new Arrivals and Departures Hall at Terminal B and the first phase of extraordinary achievements another new concourse. More than 50 percent of a Whole New LGA is now open. and milestones, but also But we continue to face challenges. The communities around the airport were the unprecedented challenges epicenter of the coronavirus, and our neighbors suffered from a health and an for the LaGuardia Airport economic crisis. Despite these daunting hurdles, the LGA Redevelopment team Redevelopment Program. remained committed to advancing the redevelopment program and maintaining its schedule, while also supporting local communities. 2020 Accomplishments Art in August Sustainability Mini Camp EXTENDED New Terminal B Virtual Events & Programs • 5,000 attendees joined Arrivals and our business development Although the community information center and workforce Departures Hall has been closed since March, the outreach development webinars team worked hard to shift all its activities Opening • 2 summer educational and events to a virtual setting. programs for the youth The most significant redevelopment milestone in 2020 was the opening of the new Terminal B Arrivals & Departures Hall. As the construction continued, the Port Authority, terminal developers, and the building trades unions implemented best-in-class COVID-19 safety protocols to keep the construction workers healthy Food & PPE Distribution COVID-19 Test Site and safe.
  • Our Plan to Pay for the Plan

    Our Plan to Pay for the Plan

    186 MOVING FORWARD CHAPTER 5 5 OUR PLAN TO PAY FOR THE PLAN 5.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate how the federal requirements for fiscal constraint are met and how Moving Forward can be implemented. Federal regulations require that the financial plan include the following: z System-level estimates of the costs and revenues reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain federal-aid highways and public transportation; z Estimates of funds that will be available for the implementation of the Plan; and z Additional financing strategies for the implementation of the Plan. 5.1.1 FINANCIAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS 187 MOVING FORWARD At the time of this writing, the current federal legislation that authorizes federal aid to highway and transit programs through September 2021 maintains the pre-existing financial planning requirements, which apply to Moving Forward. According to 23 CFR 450.324, Moving Forward is required to contain the following: (11) A financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented. (i) For purposes of transportation system operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to CHAPTER 5 adequately operate and maintain the Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). (ii) For the purpose of developing the metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO(s), public transportation operator(s), and State shall cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support metropolitan transportation plan implementation, as required under §450.314(a).
  • C.1.V. Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists

    C.1.V. Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists

    Final Environmental Impact Statement Section II.C C.1.v. Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists Provisions for pedestrians and bicyclists within the project area are limited to at-grade streets and sidewalks within the industrial areas of Brooklyn and Queens on both sides of Newtown Creek and the Brooklyn residential neighborhoods of Greenpoint and East Williamsburg. Based on review of the New York City Bicycle Map, 56th Road and Review Avenue are the only designated routes in the vicinity of the bridge and are recommended as areas where sufficient street width for bicyclists is available and where vehicular traffic is light. Pedestrian and bicycle access across the bridge is not provided, and therefore persons crossing Newtown Creek must use the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge located approximately 1.2 km (0.75 mi) northwest of the Kosciuszko Bridge or the Grand Avenue Bridge located approximately 2.1 km (1.3 mi) southeast of the Kosciuszko Bridge. In Brooklyn, Meeker Avenue, Thomas Street, Cherry Street and Anthony Street provide at- grade pedestrian access via sidewalks parallel to the bridge. Access beneath the bridge is provided at Kingsland Avenue, Morgan Avenue, Vandervoort Avenue, Varick Avenue, Stewart Avenue, Gardner Avenue and Scott Avenue. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps are only found at the Meeker Avenue/Varick Avenue intersection and the Meeker Avenue/Stewart Avenue intersection. However, due to poor sidewalk conditions and/or lack of sidewalks at certain locations, handicapped accessibility is very limited parallel to and underneath the bridge. In Queens, 43rd Street and Laurel Hill Boulevard provide at-grade pedestrian access via sidewalks parallel to the bridge between the LIE and 56th Road.
  • 03.06.2021 Gubernator Andrew M. Cuomo Gubernator

    03.06.2021 Gubernator Andrew M. Cuomo Gubernator

    Do natychmiastowej publikacji: 03.06.2021 GUBERNATOR ANDREW M. CUOMO GUBERNATOR CUOMO OGŁASZA ZAKOŃCZENIE BUDOWY ZEWNĘTRZNEJ SIECI DROGOWEJ NA LOTNISKU LAGUARDIA W RAMACH PRZEBUDOWY LOTNISKA O WARTOŚCI 8 MLD USD Projekt jest jak dotąd najnowszym, kluczowym etapem pełnej przebudowy lotniska LaGuardia, po otwarciu Terminalu B w czerwcu 2020 r. Nowa sieć drogowa lotniska otwiera się sześć miesięcy przed terminem, tuż przed sezonem letnich podróży i powrotem pasażerów na niebo 26 nowych mostów/wiaduktów zmniejszy zapotrzebowanie na sygnalizację świetlną, która powoduje korki, z 19 do 3, co poprawi przepływ ruchu wokół lotniska LaGuardia Gubernator ogłasza, że działanie Centrum Kariery LaGuardia organizacji Council for Airport Opportunity zostanie przedłużone o cztery lata, do 2025 r., aby w dalszym ciągu pomagać mieszkańcom dzielnicy Queens w znalezieniu pracy na nowym lotnisku LaGuardia W dniu dzisiejszym gubernator Andrew M. Cuomo ogłosił otwarcie nowej zewnętrznej sieci drogowej Terminalu C na lotnisku LaGuardia, której budowę zakończono sześć miesięcy przed terminem i na tyle wcześnie, aby poprawić przepływ ruchu na lotnisku, zanim podróżni powrócą na niebo tego lata. Otwarcie sieci drogowej jest ostatnim kluczowym etapem trwającej przebudowy lotniska LaGuardia, o wartości 8 mld USD, w ośrodek na miarę XXI wieku, na jaki zasługuje Nowy Jork. „Całkowicie przebudowana sieć drogowa – z nowoczesnymi systemami zarządzania ruchem drogowym i mniejszą ilością skrzyżowań wyposażonych w sygnalizację – ułatwi podróżnym dojazd samochodem do terminali lub miejsc parkingowych. Jest to znaczący krok do przodu w realizacji projektu stworzenia światowej klasy doświadczeń dla podróżnych na nowym lotnisku LaGuardia”, powiedział gubernator Cuomo. „Wraz z planami budowy AirTrain LaGuardia, pierwszego dla lotniska, niezawodnego i szybkiego połączenia kolejowego z Manhattanem, nowa sieć drogowa daje lotnisku LaGuardia możliwość stania się jednym z najbardziej dostępnych lotnisk w kraju”.
  • THE PLAZA PARK Bringing Long Island City to New Heights

    THE PLAZA PARK Bringing Long Island City to New Heights

    THE PLAZA PARK Bringing Long Island City To New Heights BRIXTON MANOR CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Brixton Manor use by a limited number of parties and has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it, and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to confirm, independently, its accuracy and completeness. All projections have been developed by Brixton Manor, Owner and designated sources, are based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of Owner, and therefore are subject to variation. No representation is made by Brixton Manor or Owner as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein is or shall be relied on as a promise or representation as to the future performance of the property. Although the information contained herein is believed to be correct, Owner and its employees disclaim any responsibility for inaccuracies and expect prospective purchasers to exercise independent due diligence in verifying all such information. Further, Brixton Manor, Owner and its employees disclaim any and all liability for representations and warranties, expressed and implied, contained in, or for omissions from, the Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the recipient. The Offering Memorandum does not constitute a representation that there has been no change in the business or affairs of the property or Owner since the date of preparation of the Offering Memorandum. Analysis and verification of the information contained in the Offering Memorandum is solely the responsibility of the prospective purchaser.
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority Requests to Reallocate FTA

    Metropolitan Transportation Authority Requests to Reallocate FTA

    Metropolitan Transportation Authority Requests to Reallocate FTA Section 5324 Resiliency Funding to MTA Repair Projects September 30, 2016 NY MTA Request for Reallocation of Resiliency Funds INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is pleased to submit the enclosed request to reallocate Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5324 Competitive Resiliency (CR) and locally- prioritized resiliency (LPR) grant funds to support the recovery/repair of New York City Transit (NYCT) and Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) assets damaged during Hurricane Sandy. Requested Competitive Resiliency Reallocation With today’s request, the MTA is requesting to reallocate $324.9 million in CR grant funds to our recovery program. This will reduce the federal share of MTA’s CR projects to $1.3 billion, as shown in the table below. Table 1 Summary of Competitive Resiliency Funds Requested for Reallocation CR Application Federal Share Local Match Budget (Award) Current MTA CR Award $2,131,956,139 $1,598,967,104 $532,989,035 Requested Reallocation to Repair ($433,212,030) ($324,909,023) ($108,303,007) Remaining MTA CR Award $1,698,744,109 $1,274,058,081 $424,686,027 Table 1a – Detail: MTA NYCT Competitive Resiliency Reallocation Requests MTA CR Project Budget Federal Share Local Match Agency NYCT ROW Equipment Hardening in Flood Prone $61,443,249 $46,082,437 $15,360,812 Areas NYCT Protection of Street Level Openings in $141,895,903 $106,421,927 $35,473,976 Flood Prone Areas NYCT Flood Mitigation in Yards $152,170,003 $114,127,503 $38,042,501
  • JEFFRION L. AUBRY Reports to the People

    JEFFRION L. AUBRY Reports to the People

    Assemblyman JEFFRION L. AUBRY Reports to the People 35TH A.D., QUEENS COUNTY • SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE • WINTER 2021 Executive Budget Highlights Dear Neighbors, The 2021 legislative year has begun. The Governor has presented his 2021-2022 budget. We in the legislature are reviewing his proposals. This newsletter provides a general overview of the Executive Budget along with important community The Executive Budget estimates spending for State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2021-22 at $192.9 information. You can get more billion, an annual growth of 0.1 percent. details on the Executive Budget by going online at https:// State Operating Funds Spending openbudget.ny.gov/ The Executive’s estimate of 1.2 percent growth in State Operating Funds remains below its 2 percent spending benchmark with anticipated total disbursements of $103.4 billion. The pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic on the process of General Fund Spending government is substantial. The The Executive Budget estimates General Fund disbursements of $82 billion in SFY new federal administration will 2021-22 for an annual growth of $7.2 billion, or 9.6 percent. be helpful in addressing the financial pressure, but it cannot Closing the SFY 2020-21 and SFY 2021-22 Budget Gaps alleviate the entire budget The Executive Budget closes a combined budget gap of $15 billion over state fiscal shortfall. The state will have years 2020-21 ($4.8 billion) and 2021-22 ($10.2 billion). It also eliminates these gaps to raise revenues and reduce with spending reductions totaling $4.3 billion in SFY 2020-21 and $3.5 billion in SFY funding to some degree.