The Global University the Role of Senior Managers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Fourth Report of Senior Pay and Perks in UK Universities History This
Transparency at the top? The fourth report of senior pay and perks in UK universities History This is the fourth report on pay and perks at the top of British higher education institutions (HEIs) to be published by the University and College Union (UCU). It forms part of the union’s ongoing campaign for greater transparency in higher education, including the rationale behind senior pay rises. UCU submitted a Freedom of Information (FoI) request to 158 HEIs in October 2017. This followed similar requests submitted in 2016, 2015 and 2014. All requests were designed to shine a light on the arbitrary nature of senior pay and perks in universities, and support the union’s call for reform. The basis for this report The FoI request that forms the basis of this report was sent to 158 (HEIs). It requested details of vice-chancellors’ (or head of institution if known by a different title) salaries and those of other senior post-holders earning over £100,000 at the institution during the academic year of 2016/17 (1 August 2016 to 31 July 2017). It also asked for details of flights, spending on hotels, spending on expenses and if the vice-chancellor was provided with accommodation by the university. Finally, we requested to know whether or not the vice-chancellor was a member of the remuneration committee, and requested a copy of the most recently ratified minutes of the institution’s remuneration committee. Variety of responses The questions on expenditure on flights, hotels, expenses and accommodation for vice-chancellors elicited a huge variation in responses with many institutions deploying exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act to avoid providing data. -
The Field Description of Igneous Rocks the Field Description of Igneous Rocks
The Field Description of Igneous Rocks The Field Description of Igneous Rocks SECOND EDITION Dougal Jerram Durham University Nick Petford University of Northampton A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication The Geological Field Guide Series Barnes, J.W. and Lisle, R.J. (2004) Basic Geological Mapping, 4th edn. ISBN: 978-0-470-84986-6, 5th edn publishing (2011). ISBN: 978-0-470-68634-8 Fry, N. (1991) The Field Description of Metamorphic Rocks. ISBN: 978-0-471-93221-5 McClay, K.R. (1991) The Mapping of Geological Structures. ISBN: 978-0-471-93243-7 Milsom, J. and Eriksen, A. (2010) Field Geophysics, 4th edn. ISBN: 978-0-470-74984-5 Tucker, M.E. (2011) Sedimentary Rocks in the Field, 4th edn. ISBN: 978-0-470-68916-5 This edition first published 2011 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, formed by the merger of Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing. Registered office: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/ wiley-blackwell The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. -
Assessment: What's in It for Schools?
Assessment What’s in it for schools? Assessment is a prominent and sometimes controversial issue in education. This book looks at how and why assessment matters in the classroom, discussing key issues such as: • Can assessment raise standards? • Can current practice be improved? • How does self-assessment help pupils learn? Each chapter includes practical advice for teachers on how to move from assessment that merely measures and certifies to that which is an integral and planned element of the learning process. This book is for all those who want to develop their understanding and use of assessment, to improve teaching and learning in their schools. Paul Weeden is a Lecturer in Geography Education at the University of Birmingham. Jan Winter is a Lecturer and Patricia Broadfoot is Professor of Education, both at the Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol. What’s in it for schools? Edited by Kate Myers and John MacBeath Inspection: What’s in it for schools? James Learmonth Leadership: What’s in it for schools? Thomas J.Sergiovanni Self-evaluation: What’s in it for schools? John MacBeath and Archie McGlynn School Improvement: What’s in it for schools? Alma Harris Assessment: What’s in it for schools? Paul Weeden, Jan Winter and Patricia Broadfoot Assessment What’s in it for schools? Paul Weeden Jan Winter Patricia Broadfoot London and New York First published 2002 by RoutledgeFalmer 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by RoutledgeFalmer 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. -
Review of Philanthropy in UK Higher Education
Review of Philanthropy in UK Higher Education 2012 status report and challenges for the next decade Report to HEFCE by More Partnership September 2012 Contents Foreword 2 Executive Summary 4 Recommendations 10 Chapter 1: Introduction 13 Audiences for this report 14 Evidence base for this report 14 Report structure 15 Chapter 2: The past ten years 16 The Matched Funding Scheme 2008-11 19 The ethics of HEI engagement with philanthropy 23 Workforce development and capacity-building 23 Institutional leadership 26 Chapter 3: Why donors give to higher education 28 Chapter 4: The role of Government 36 Matched funding – impact and future 36 Taxation, Government policy and financial education 37 Indirect encouragement and celebration of philanthropic behaviour 41 Chapter 5: Impact of philanthropy on higher education 43 What donors support and make possible 43 Giving as a proportion of total university expenditure 45 Donor influence 46 Chapter 6: Lessons for universities 48 Broad changes universities can make 48 Embedding experience 50 Fundraising practice 52 Workforce development 54 Chapter 7: Myth busting 59 Chapter 8: Conclusions: The next ten years 65 List of Appendices 64 1 Foreword 1. Philanthropy is “the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed especially by the generous donation of money to good causes”1. This is one of the UK’s great traditions – and education is one of the greatest causes. From medieval through Victorian to modern times, generous donations have facilitated the development of academic institutions. Philanthropy has enabled them to become internationally successful and to play their part in the economic, social and cultural successes of the UK over many years. -
Annual Review 2005/06 (2.77 MB PDF)
01 The University of Edinburgh Annual Review 2005/06 www.ed.ac.uk 2005/06 Our Mission The University’s mission is the advancement and dissemination of knowledge and understanding. As a leading international centre of academic excellence, the University has as its core mission: • to sustain and develop its position as a research and teaching institution of the highest international quality and to benchmark its performance against world-class standards; • to provide an outstanding educational environment, supporting study across a broad range of academic disciplines and serving the major professions; • to produce graduates equipped for high personal and professional achievement; and • to contribute to society, promoting health, economic and cultural wellbeing. As a great civic university, Edinburgh especially values its intellectual and economic relationship with the Scottish community that forms its base and provides the foundation from which it will continue to look to the widest international horizons, enriching both itself and Scotland. 59603_EdUni_AR2006 1 11/1/07 08:14:20 “ At the heart of all that we achieve are our students and staff, and our alumni and friends, and I must thank the entire University community most warmly for the great achievements of the last year.” 59603_EdUni_AR2006 2 11/1/07 08:14:20 03 The University of Edinburgh Annual Review 2005/06 www.ed.ac.uk 2005/06 Principal’s Foreword Each year the Annual Review presents us with the of these categories. It is these solid foundations opportunity to capture as best we can a fl avour which form the basis for the confi dent, forward- of the life of the University over the previous year. -
Dame Shirley Pearce
SCR Annual Dinner Wednesday 17 May 2017 Guest of Honour and speaker Professor Dame Shirley Pearce Shirley is currently Chair of Court and Council at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and a member of the Higher Education Quality Assurance Panel for the Ministry of Education in Singapore. She has held senior executive and non executive roles in higher education, health and policing. Her non executive roles have included four ministerial appointments in three different government departments; DoH, BIS and the Home Office. Prior to moving to LSE, she was appointed by Theresa May then Home Secretary, as Independent Chair of the College of Policing. This was the first professional body for policing. During her executive and academic career she held appointments at University College London (UCL) the University of East Anglia (UEA) and Loughborough University. At UEA she was Pro Vice Chancellor responsible for the health and professional schools. She led the growth of these teaching and research programmes, culminating in leading the bid for a new medical school at UEA. This had a distinctive, innovative, presentation-based curriculum, which also enabled medical students to learn in an inter-professional environment. Shirley moved from UEA to become Vice Chancellor of Loughborough University where she developed and delivered a new strategy for the university. The university enjoyed numerous successes and grew its turnover from £160 million to £235 million. It had significant research success working closely with industry partners and gained the greatest increase in REF funding in 2006 of any university without a medical school. Loughborough University was top of the student experience league table for six consecutive years. -
Learning and Teaching Reimagined
Learning and teaching reimagined A new dawn for higher education? November 2020 With thanks to: All those who contributed to this research, from students, staff and leaders to sector organisations and our advisory board. Advisory board members Professor David Maguire, interim principal and vice-chancellor, University of Dundee Chair, learning and teaching reimagined Professor Liz Barnes CBE, vice-chancellor, Staffordshire University Professor Tim Blackman, vice-chancellor, The Open University Professor Nick Braisby, vice-chancellor, Buckinghamshire New University Professor Alec Cameron, vice-chancellor, Aston University Professor Anne Carlisle OBE, vice-chancellor and CEO, Falmouth University Professor Sir Chris Husbands, vice-chancellor, Sheffield Hallam University Professor Tansy Jessop, pro-vice-chancellor, University of Bristol Heidi Fraser-Krauss, executive director of corporate services, The University of Sheffield Professor Julie Lydon, vice-chancellor, University of South Wales Professor Peter Mathieson, principal, The University of Edinburgh Professor Nick Petford, vice-chancellor, University of Northampton Professor Anne Trefethen, pro-vice-chancellor, University of Oxford Ashley Wheaton, principal, University College of Estate Management Advisory board observers Dr Paul Feldman, CEO, Jisc Chris Hale, director of policy, Universities UK Alison Johns, CEO, Advance HE Nic Newman, Emerge Education Authors Professor David Maguire, interim principal and vice-chancellor, University of Dundee Chair, learning and teaching reimagined -
Alumni Distinctions; Honorary Degrees
REVIEW OF THE YEAR 2009/10 2009/10 REVIEW OF THE YEAR Alumni distinctions and honorary degrees Philanthropy Alumni distinctions The generosity of alumni, friends, companies, charitable trusts and current students and staff Bristol alumni excel in many fields. The following are among those who were awarded enhances the University’s teaching and research year on year. The collective impact of donations particular distinctions by external organisations in 2009/10. made to Bristol cannot be underestimated. And behind the numbers each gift takes on a life of its own as it touches an individual student or academic, enabling them to do more, faster. Fellow of the Royal Society CBE OBE Professor Peter Cawley Professor of His Honour Judge Keith Cutler (LLB 1971) Julia Fawcett (BA 1987) Chief Executive, Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College Circuit judge, for services to the Lowry Centre, for services to the arts in the In 2009/10, Bristol’s supporters 2009/10 Bristol Pioneers Mr John D W Pocock (BSc 1982) Mr Thomas J G Davies (BA 2000) donated in greater numbers and £25,000+ Mr Andrew Roberts (BSc 1968) Mr William G R Davies (BSc 1971) London (BSc 1975, PhD 1979) administration of justice North West Mr Geoffrey H Rowley (BA 1958) Mrs Alison C Davis (BSc 1984) Mr Graham H Blyth (BSc 1969) with ever-more generous gifts: Mr Daniel J O Schaffer (LLB 1986) Professor Richard N Dixon, FRS Mr Richard M Campbell-Breeden Professor Gideon Davies Professor of George Ferguson (BA 1968, BArch 1971, Simon Gillham (CertEd 1979) Director, Emeritus Professor -
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Summative Assessment and Tests on Students' Motivation for Learning
REVIEW June 2002 EPPI-Centre A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning Review conducted by the Assessment and Learning Research Synthesis Group Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre The EPPI-Centre is part of the Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/ AUTHORS AND INSTITUTIONAL BASES This work is a review of the Assessment and Learning Research Synthesis Group (ALRSG). It was conducted following the procedures for systematic review developed by the EPPI-Centre and in collaboration with David Gough and Dina Kiwan, and with help from other members of the EPPI-Centre education team. Principal authors Wynne Harlen, Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol. Ruth Deakin Crick, Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol. ALRSG members Professor Patricia Broadfoot, University of Bristol Professor Richard Daugherty, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Professor John Gardner, Queen’s University, Belfast Professor Wynne Harlen, University of Bristol Dr Mary James, University of Cambridge Dr Gordon Stobart, Institute of Education, University of London (The above are also members of the Assessment Review Group.) Mr P Dudley, Head of School Improvement and Lifelong Learning, Redbridge, and member of AAIA Mr R Bevan, Deputy Headteacher, King Edward VI Grammar School, Chelmsford Ms P Rayner, Headteacher, Caldecote Primary School, Cambridge Dr Ruth Deakin Crick, Researcher EPPI-Centre members Dr David Gough, Deputy Director Ms Dina Kiwan, Education Research Officer Expert advisers to the ALRSG The ALRSG is advised by the following international experts: Dr Steven Bakker, ETS International, The Netherlands Dr Dennis Bartels, President, TERC, Cambridge, MA. -
The Student's Freedom to Learn Requires the Educator's Freedom Toteach
Building inclusive V.18 N.4 (#96) Summer 2009 $12.00 classrooms, communities ISSN 0840-7339 Financial literacy education — the solution to credit crises? O O U U The corporate presence in R Our Schools/Our Selves is a quarterly journal on education published R S Japanese classrooms by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA). S C C H H O O O To subscribe to Our Schools/Our Selves , contact: O L L S Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) S / 410-75 Albert St., Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7 / O Tel: 613.563.1341 Fax: 613.233.1458 O U U [email protected] R R www.policyalternatives.ca S S E E L L V V E E S S V V . 1 1 8 8 N N . 4 4 ( ( # # 9 9 6 6 ) ) S S U U M M M M E E R R 2 2 0 0 0 0 Freedom to Teach, 9 Freedom to Teach, 9 1 1 2 2 FFrreeeeddoomm ttoo LLeeaarrnn . 0 0 0 0 PPrrooffeessssiioonnaalljjuuddggmmeenntt,,aauutthheennttiicc PRINTED IN A UNION SHOP lleeaarrnniinnggaannddccrreeaattiivveeccllaassssrroooommss NICK FORTE The Student’s Freedom to Learn Requires the Educator’s Freedom to Teach always believed — and still do believe — that education is Iabout learning to think critically, asking questions and using one’s imagination: creating a classroom atmosphere where thinking, questioning and imagining is encouraged because this is what permits students the freedom to truly learn. But for stu - dents to learn, teachers need the freedom to teach. And increas - ingly, freedom to teach is in short supply. -
The Sociology of Assessment: Comparative and Policy Perspectives: the Selected Works of Patricia Broadfoot/Patricia Broadfoot
The Sociology of Assessment: Comparative and Policy Perspectives In the World Library of Educationalists series, international experts them- selves compile career-long collections of what they judge to be their finest pieces – extracts from books, key articles, salient research findings, major theoretical and practical contributions – so the world can read them in a single manageable volume. Readers will be able to follow the themes and strands and see how their work contributes to the development of the field. In a collection of her most influential work spanning nearly four decades, Patricia Broadfoot applies her trademark sociological and comparative per- spective to empirical studies at every level of the educational system. From her classic long-term study of the impact of changing national assessment policies on pupils and teachers in the classrooms of England and France to her sustained championship of the need for a better understanding of the impact of assessment on learning, Broadfoot has consistently championed the need for a more developed sociological understanding of assessment. Broadfoot’s accessible writing offers insights that are as novel as they are important for the education of future generations. This book allows readers to follow themes and strands across Patricia Broadfoot’s career and will be of interest to all followers of her work and any reader interested in the development of teaching, learning and assessment. Dr Patricia Broadfoot is Professor Emeritus of Sociology of Education at the University of Bristol, UK. She is a former Head of the School of Education, Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Pro Vice Chancellor at the University of Bristol and was Vice Chancellor of the University of Gloucestershire, UK. -
The Fifth Report of Senior Pay and Perks at UK Universities
Transparency at the top? The fifth report of senior pay and perks in UK universities History This is the fifth report on pay and perks at the top of British higher education institutions (HEIs) to be published by the University and College Union (UCU). It forms part of the union’s ongoing campaign for greater transparency in higher education, including the rationale behind senior pay rises. UCU submitted a Freedom of Information (FoI) request to 158 HEIs in November 2018. This followed similar requests submitted in 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014. All requests were designed to shine a light on the arbitrary nature of senior pay and perks in universities, and support the union’s call for reform. The basis for this report The FoI request that forms the basis of this report was sent to 158 HEIs. It requested details of vice-chancellors’ (or head of institution if known by a different title) salaries and those of other senior post-holders earning over £100,000 at the institution during the academic year of 2017/18 (1 August 2017 to 31 July 2018). It also asked for details spending on flights and hotels, and if the vice- chancellor was provided with accommodation by the university. Finally, we requested to know whether or not the vice-chancellor was a member of the remuneration committee, if they could attend even if not a member and requested a copy of the most recently ratified minutes of the institution’s remuneration committee. Variety of responses The questions on salary, expenditure on flights, hotels and accommodation for vice-chancellors elicited a huge variation in responses with many institutions deploying exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act to avoid providing data.