Weather and Climate Patterns in Canada's Prairie Grasslands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weather and Climate Patterns in Canada's Prairie Grasslands 105 Chapter 5 Weather and Climate Patterns in Canada’s Prairie Grasslands Sean M. McGinn Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1 Abstract. The underlying uniqueness of Canada’s prairie grasslands is its aridity. The dominant air mass of this region is continental in nature and is associated with a relatively low amount of precipitation and high potential evaporation during the summer. Drought in this region is frequent, lasting one to two months on average, and presents a significant barrier to ecological capacity and agriculture. Severe droughts are associated with a stalled anticyclonic system that directs advected moist air around the region. Canada’s prairie grasslands receive on average of between 300 and 550 mm of precipitation, most of which is received as rain in spring and summer. Over the last century, changes to the climate have resulted in a general warming trend that is projected to increase further as a result of an enhanced greenhouse gas effect. Native grassland plant diversity and insect populations may shift as a result of expected climate changes. Résumé. Les prairies canadiennes doivent leur caractère unique à leur aridité. La masse d’air dominante dans cette région est continentale, et se caractérise par un degré relativement faible de précipitations et une évaporativité élevée en été. Les sécheresses sont fréquentes dans cette région; elles durent en moyenne de un à deux mois et réduisent sensiblement la capacité limite du paysage et le rendement agricole. Les sécheresses graves sont causées par un système anticyclonique stable qui empêche les courants d’air humide de pénétrer dans la région. Les prairies canadiennes reçoivent en moyenne de 300 à 550 mm de précipitations, la plupart sous forme de pluie au printemps et en été. Au cours du dernier siècle, le changement climatique a provoqué un réchauffement général qui devrait s’intensifier sous l’effet de l’augmentation des concentrations de gaz à effet de serre. La diversité des espèces végétales indigènes et les populations d’insectes pourraient évoluer sous l’effet des changements climatiques attendus. Introduction The prairie grasslands of Canada possess unique characteristics because of their topography, soil, fire frequency, climate, grazing, and imposed pressure from human activity (Ripley 1992). Although the current distribution of grasslands is attributed to both natural and anthropical forces, climate remains the dominant factor (Barnes 1959; Padbury et al. 2002). It is not surprising, therefore, that production of prairie flora is strongly related to weather elements such as precipitation (Smoliak 1986; Thorpe et al. 2008) and is well adapted to fluctuations in weather (Coupland 1958). For Canada’s prairie grasslands, an extension of the Northern Great Plains, the climate component is characterized as predominantly continental. Although the makeup of prairie grasslands has changed because of the introduction of agriculture (i.e., cropped grasslands), grasslands remain a distinctive landscape. Prairie grasslands extend eastward from the Canadian Rockies to the Assiniboine–Red River Valley in Manitoba and are bordered to the north by the boreal forest (see Chapter 3). Here, the seasonal extremes fluctuate between long, cold winters and short, warm summers. The McGinn, S. M. 2010. Weather and Climate Patterns in Canada’s Prairie Grasslands. In Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands (Volume 1): Ecology and Interactions in Grassland Habitats. Edited by J. D. Shorthouse and K. D. Floate. Biological Survey of Canada. pp. 105-119. © 2010 Biological Survey of Canada. ISBN 978-0-9689321-4-8 doi:10.3752/9780968932148.ch5 106 S. M. McGinn continental polar air mass that typically resides over this region produces relatively low amounts of precipitation. Periodic interruptions of moist maritime polar air in winter and summer by colder and drier arctic air masses generate the variety of weather experienced across the prairie grasslands. The seasonal extremes in air temperature, and the low amount of precipitation, are common elements of grassland ecosystems throughout the world. The extreme nature of climate on the prairies was first highlighted in relation to agricultural capacity during the 1856 expedition of Captain John Palliser (Spry 1959). Having spent a short time in the region, Palliser reported that southern Alberta and Saskatchewan, and a small area in southwestern Manitoba, would not support viable agriculture. The normal climate of this arid region, which became known as Palliser’s Triangle, was later proven to be capable of supporting agriculture if specialized practices were used (Grace 1987a). However, even with the advancements in agriculture today, periods of extreme weather, especially that of drought, continue to shape the agricultural and ecological capacities of the region. The climate of the prairie region prior to direct weather observations has been reconstructed by using many types of proxy data (Nkemdirim 1991). Such reconstruction of the climatic record has given insight into the potential for future climate. For example, drought intensity as experienced in the 1930s may have been more frequent in the past (Laird et al. 1996) and suggests that we are currently experiencing a climate without these extreme fluctuations. Precipitation across the Prairie Grasslands Precipitation amounts and timing are the principal climate features of the Canadian prairie grasslands that effectively determine the vitality of this ecosystem. In the absence of regional changes in topography and coastlines, the main force controlling regional precipitation patterns is the circulation of the atmosphere (Borchert 1950). In particular, the movement of cyclonic (low-pressure) systems across this region is a critical process that delivers advected moisture. The Canadian prairies receive an annual average of 454 mm of precipitation (McGinn and Shepherd 2003), which is much less than the Canada-wide average of 535 mm (Phillips 1990). However, the distribution of precipitation across these grasslands is highly variable, ranging from an annual low of 300–350 to a high of 500– 550 mm. In general, the driest region coincides with Palliser’s Triangle (Fig. 1). The distribution of precipitation is seasonal. Approximately 70–80% of the annual precipitation across the prairies is received as rain (Wheaton 1998). The rain received in June and July accounts for 20–35% of the yearly total precipitation and 42–54% of the growing- season precipitation (Chakravarti 1972). For the southern grasslands (between 49 and 52–54° N latitude), the peak month for rainfall is June, coinciding with the early summer position of the jet stream (a narrow band of strong winds in the high troposphere) and more frequent tracking of cyclonic systems. At higher latitudes, the peak month for precipitation is July, again coinciding with the predominant position of the jet stream at that time of the year. Within the Canadian prairies, the province of Saskatchewan receives the least annual precipitation (395 mm), followed by Alberta (482 mm) and Manitoba (486 mm) (Shepherd and McGinn 2003). In winter, the southern corridor of Alberta and central Saskatchewan receives 40 mm or less precipitation, whereas the southern border of Alberta and Saskatchewan (around Cypress Hills) receives more precipitation (Fig. 2). More than 60 mm of precipitation is received in northern Alberta and along the foothills, as well as in Manitoba. During the summer, areas of southeastern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan receive precipitation of between 120 and 145 mm. The maximum average precipitation in the summer occurs in central-northern Alberta (200–300 mm) and in eastern Manitoba (220 mm). Weather and Climate Patterns in Canada’s Prairie Grasslands 107 Fig. 1. Average annual precipitation (mm) across the prairie provinces (from Wheaton 1998). Prairie Drought Three basic weather patterns dominate the Canadian prairie grasslands in the summer: a mid-troposphere (approximately 10 km in height) ridge that occurs 72% of the time, a mid-troposphere trough with a 14% occurrence, and a zonal flow occurring 14% of the time (Dey 1982). A prolonged decrease in precipitation on these grasslands coincides with the mid-troposphere ridge pattern that remains stationary. An anticyclonic system (high- pressure area) associated with the ridge drives the jet stream northward, allowing moist maritime polar air to flow into the prairie region. This advection of atmospheric moisture into the prairie region accounts for about 65–76% of the rainfall received in the summer (June, July, and August; Raddatz 2000). The causes of drought continue to be evaluated. Bonsal and Wheaton (2005) reported that, unlike the typical 1961 and 1988 droughts of the Canadian prairies, where the formation of ridges and troughs had a key role, the 2001–2002 drought on the Canadian prairies had no relationships to large-scale circulation patterns. Instead, the drought was caused by a unique circulation pattern related to a northward extension of a persistent drought of the continental United States. Although the meteorological causes of drought are well recognized after they occur, they are often difficult to predict. In addition, the impact of drought is not always straightforward. A clear definition is needed when describing drought because the degree of impact is related to the intensity and duration of a drought event. Drought on the prairies is not characterized solely by a prolonged period of reduced precipitation (meteorological
Recommended publications
  • 2013 Washington State Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan Severe Storm Hazard Profile
    Final - Hazard Profile – Severe Storm Severe Storm Frequency 50+ yrs 10-50 yrs 1-10 yrs Annually People <1,000 1,000-10,000 10,000-50,000 50,000+ Economy 1% GDP 1-2% GDP 2-3% GDP 3%+ GDP Environment <10% 10-15% 15%-20% 20%+ Property <$100M $100M-$500M $500M-$1B $1B+ Severe Storm Risk Level Hazard scale < Low to High > Frequency – Severe storms, which include any or a combination of: thunderstorms, hail, wind storms, lightning, or a tornado, happen annually in Washington. People – Looking at past history of injuries and deaths due to severe storms in Washington, the minimum threshold of a thousand injuries for this category is not met. Economy – According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center, Washington has not experienced a severe weather event that totaled losses that met or exceeded the minimum dollar amount /percentage for this category.1 Environment – Severe storms do affect the environmental landscape of Washington, but their effect does not meet the minimum threshold for this category. Property – Severe storms can have a large impact on the property of the state, both residential and commercial. The December 2006 windstorm affected all 39 counties and the estimate for damage is still being tallied and is greater than $50 million. Total property damage from the greatest windstorm to hit Washington is estimated at $235 million (1962 dollars). This was the Columbus Day Storm of October 1962, which was the strongest non-tropical storm to ever hit the contiguous 48 states. Figure 5.7-1 and Figure 5.7-2 below show previous occurrences of tornado and hail events, respectively, from 1960 to 2012 as reported by the National Climatic Data Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinook Vol. 9 No. 3
    .+ Learning Weather • • • A resource study kit suitable for students grade seven and up, prepared by the Atmospheric Environment Service of Environment Canada Includes new revised poster·size cloud chart Decouvrons la meteO ... Pochettes destinees aux eleves du secondaire et du collegial, preparees par Ie service de I'environnement atmos heri ue d'Environnement Canada Incluant un tableau revise descriptif des nuages Learning Weather Decouvrons la meteo A resource study kit, contains: Pochette documentaire comprenant: 1. Mapping Weather 1. Cartographie de la meteo A series of maps with exercises. Teaches how Serie de cartes accompagnees d'exercices. Oecrit weather moves. Includes climatic data for 50 Cana­ les fluctuations du temps et fournit des donnees dian locations. climatologiques pour 50 localites canadiennes. 2. Knowing Weather 2. Apprenons a connaitre la meteo Booklet discusses weather events, weather facts Brochure traitant d'evenements, de faits et de legen· and folklore, measurement of weather and several des meteorologiques. Techniques de I'observation et student projects to study weather. de la prevision de la met eo. Projets scolaires sur la 3. Knowing Clouds meteorologie. A cloud chart to help students identify various cloud 3. Apprenons a connaitre les nuages formations. Tableau descriptif des nuages aidant les elilves a identifier differentes formations. Cat. No. EN56·5311983·E Each kit $4.95 Cat. N° EN56·5311983F Chaque pochette: 4,95 $ Order kits from: Commandez les pochettes au : CANADIAN GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING CENTRE CENTRE D'EDITION DU GOUVERNEMENT DU OTTAWA, CANADA CANADA, K1A OS9 OTTAWA (CANADA) K1A OS9 Order Form (please print) Bon de commande Veuillez m'ex pedier _ _ exemplaire(s) de la pochette Please send me _ _ copy(ies) of Learning Weather at $4.95 "Decouvrons la meteo" it 4.95 $ la co pie.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Downslope Winds Chinook Wall
    MET 4300 Lecture 21 Mountain Windstorms (CH17) Downslope Winds Chinook Wall --Hurricane force winds •Foehn in the European Alps (a general term for warm, dry downslope windstorms –Latin: west wind) •Bora in the Adriatic Sea SE of the Dinaric Alps (a general term for cold downslope windstorms—Greek: north wind) •Katabatic Winds: in high-latitude icefields in Alaska, Greenland and Antarctica (very cold winds) In US: •Chinook or Snow Eater in the east slope of the Rockies •Santa Ana in California: west slope of the San Bernardino, Santa Ana, and San Gabriel Mountains Downslope Winds in Western North America •Chinooks: can be extremely gusty (>100 kts), occur every year, mainly in late fall & winter. Chinooks extends from north to south along the plains of eastern Colorado from Fort Collins to Colorado Springs, including Denver and Boulder. The worst downslope winds are in Boulder. An example of Chinook Winds Jan 16-17, 1982 Chinook Wind Measurement at NCAR Boulder CO Chinooks are warm (or hot), strong and gusty, blowing from a fixed direction, generally away from the mountains Gusts may exceed 100 kts. Influence the plains of eastern CO, mainly Boulder. Gustiness (from 100mph to 10 mph within a minute) can cause a lot of roof damages, and psychological problems. Dynamics of Downslope Windstorms: Chinooks & Santa Ana are Dynamically-Driven Altocumulus Mountain Waves and Lenticularis Lenticular Clouds Dynamics: winds driven by strong pressure gradients that develop across mountain ranges; air rise on windward side and descend on the leeward
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of the Chinook Wind at Havre, Mont
    54 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW FEBRUARY1934 gations be carried out to determine the aniount of residual since it will, in general, be small in coriiparison to other air which should be left inside the pressure elements in uncertainties present. order to obtain R coiiipensat8ionpressure of about 600 nib. The mtliors desire to acknowledge the helpful sug- This work is now being done at the Weitt,lier Burenu and gestions of Dr. W. G. Brombacher, in charge of the the results will appear shortly. If this work gives satis- Aeronautic Instrument Section, United States Bureau of factory results, it is planned to recoinpensate the elements Standards, where these tests mere cnrried out. now in use and then to omit the temperature correctim BATTLE OF THE CHINOOK WIND AT HAVRE, MONT. By FRANKA. hhTH IWenther Bureau offire, Havre, Mont., January 1Y34] Appnrently Havre, Rlont., was on the battle front clown between zero and 19' F. Then at 6:55 p.m. of the between cold polar air and warm Pacific nir during most 10th the drift from the east gave way to a northerly wind of December 1933. Diiring the first week tlie weather and the full force of a west-southwest chinooli struck at was generally ikir and mild, and the ground bare of SIUJW. 7:40 p.m. Tlie velocities ranged from 20 to 33 miles per From the night of December 9 to Deceniher 12 a spell UI hour during the nest 3 hours with a temperature rise to cloudy weather with light-to-heavy snowfall prevailed. 41' by 8:15 p.m., a jump of 37Oin 1 hour and 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 – Atmospheric Circulations (Pp
    Chapter 7 - Title Chapter 7 – Atmospheric Circulations (pp. 165-195) Contents • scales of motion and turbulence • local winds • the General Circulation of the atmosphere • ocean currents Wind Examples Fig. 7.1: Scales of atmospheric motion. Microscale → mesoscale → synoptic scale. Scales of Motion • Microscale – e.g. chimney – Short lived ‘eddies’, chaotic motion – Timescale: minutes • Mesoscale – e.g. local winds, thunderstorms – Timescale mins/hr/days • Synoptic scale – e.g. weather maps – Timescale: days to weeks • Planetary scale – Entire earth Scales of Motion Table 7.1: Scales of atmospheric motion Turbulence • Eddies : internal friction generated as laminar (smooth, steady) flow becomes irregular and turbulent • Most weather disturbances involve turbulence • 3 kinds: – Mechanical turbulence – you, buildings, etc. – Thermal turbulence – due to warm air rising and cold air sinking caused by surface heating – Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) - due to wind shear, i.e. change in wind speed and/or direction Mechanical Turbulence • Mechanical turbulence – due to flow over or around objects (mountains, buildings, etc.) Mechanical Turbulence: Wave Clouds • Flow over a mountain, generating: – Wave clouds – Rotors, bad for planes and gliders! Fig. 7.2: Mechanical turbulence - Air flowing past a mountain range creates eddies hazardous to flying. Thermal Turbulence • Thermal turbulence - essentially rising thermals of air generated by surface heating • Thermal turbulence is maximum during max surface heating - mid afternoon Questions 1. A pilot enters the weather service office and wants to know what time of the day she can expect to encounter the least turbulent winds at 760 m above central Kansas. If you were the weather forecaster, what would you tell her? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate of the Matanuska Valley
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SINCLAIR WEEKS, Secretary WEATHER BUREAU F. W. REICHELDERFER, Chief TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 27 The Climate of the Matanuska Valley Prepared by ROBERT F. DALE CLIMATOLOGICAL SECTION CENTER. U. S. WEATHER BUREAU, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA WASHINGTON, D. C. MARCH 1956 For sale by the Superintendent of Document!!, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. • Price 25 cents PREFACE This study was made possible only through the unselfish service of the copperative weather observers listed in table 1 and the Weather Bureau and Soil Conservation officials who conceived and implemented the network in 1941. Special mention should be given Max Sherrod at Matanuska No. 12, and Irving Newville (deceased) at Matanuska No. 2, both original colonists and charter observers with more than 10 years of cooperative weather observing to their credit. Among the many individuals who have furnished information and assistance in the preparation of this study should be mentioned Don L. Irwin Director of the Alaska Agricultural Experiment Station; Dr. Curtis H. Dear­ born, Horticulturist and present weather observer at the Matanuska Agri­ cultural Experiment Station; Glen Jefferson, Regional Director, and Mac A. Emerson, Assistant Regional Director, U. S. Weather Bureau; and Alvida H. Nordling, my assistant in the Anchorage Climatological Section. RoBERT F. DALE. FEBRUARY 1955. III CONTENTS Page Preface____________________________________________________________________ III 1. Introduction____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinook Winds
    THE CHINOOK WINDS. By ALVIN T. BURROWS, Observer, Weather Burecin. ORIGIN OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NAME " CHINOOK" TO WINDS. At the present time there are three different winds called Chinooks. Each of them is essentially a warm wind, whose effect is most notice- able in winter. Under their influence snow is melted with astonishing rapidity and the weather soon becomes balmy and spring-like. The name ''Chinook" is that of an Indian tribe which formerly lived near the mouth of the Columbia Kiver. It Avas first applied to a warm southwest wind which blew from ''.over Chinook camp" to the trading post established by the Hudson Bay Fur Company at Astoria, Oregon. The name soon came into general use in that locality, and as the adja- cent country was settled the usage extended, so that now "Chinook" is applied not only to the warm, moist southwest winds along the Oregon and Washington coast, but to the warm, dry, descending winds east of the Cascade range in Washington and the Rocky Mountains in Montana and elsewhere. In 1895 Mr. B. S. Pague, the local forecast official at Portland, Oregon, began to call the descending southeast winds that visited western Oregon and Washington during the winter Chinooks. WET AND DRY CHINOOKS. The warm, wet Chinook of the Pacific coast was for many years sup- posed to owe its existence to the Japan Current over which it was thought to blow. This is still the popular belief in many localities where the wind occurs. Scientific investigation has shown the fallacy of this view.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Regions of Montana
    FOREST REGIONS OF MONTANA STEPHEN F. ARNO This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-218 INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-218 April 1979 FOREST REGIONS OF MONTANA STEPHEN F. ARNO INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U. S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 THE AUTHOR STEPHEN F. ARNO is a Plant Ecologist on the Forest Ecosystems research work unit at Missoula. He earned a B. S. in forestry at Washington State University and a master's degree and a Ph. D. in forestry and plant science at the University of Mon- tana before joining the Forest Service in 1970. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Robert Pfister (USDA Forest Service Project Leader) gave encouragement and advice throughout this study. The following for- esters from USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, shared their information on the distributions of indicator plants: Robert Bigler, Herbert Holdorf (Soil Scientist), John Joy, Bernard Kovalchik, Tom Lawrence, Gary Learn, B. John Losensky, and James Schaeffer. Similar information was provided by Joseph Antos, James Habeck, and Pete Zager from the Botany Department of the University of Montana and by Tad Weaver, John Rumley, and Frank Forcella from Montana State University. In addition, I would like to thank the many people who provided review comments during the develop- ment of this manuscript. Page INTRODUCTION .......................... DELINEATING MONTANA FOREST REGIONS .......... FOREST REGION DESCRIPTIONS ................ Northwestern Montana Forest Region ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II, Chapter 16 Wind River Subbasin
    Volume II, Chapter 16 Wind River Subbasin TABLE OF CONTENTS 16.0 WIND RIVER SUBBASIN ...................................................................................... 16-1 16.1 Subbasin Description............................................................................................. 16-1 16.1.1 Topography & Geology................................................................................. 16-1 16.1.2 Climate .......................................................................................................... 16-1 16.1.3 Land Use/Land Cover.................................................................................... 16-1 16.2 Focal Fish Species ................................................................................................. 16-5 16.2.1 Spring Chinook—Wind Subbasin .................................................................. 16-5 16.2.2 Fall Chinook—Wind Subbasin ...................................................................... 16-8 16.2.3 Mid-Columbia Bright Late Fall Chinook—Wind Subbasin ........................ 16-11 16.2.4 Chum—Wind Subbasin................................................................................ 16-14 16.2.5 Summer Steelhead—Wind Subbasin............................................................ 16-16 16.2.6 Winter Steelhead—Wind Subbasin.............................................................. 16-19 16.3 Potentially Manageable Impacts.......................................................................... 16-21 16.4 Hatchery Programs .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Large Amplitude Lee Waves and Chinook Winds Report No.4
    Large Amplitude Lee Waves and Chinook Winds Report No.4 By Donald W. Beran E.R. Reiter, Project Director Grant WBG-59 Under Contract with Department of Commerce U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 75 Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado LARGE AMPLITUDE LEE WAVES AND CHINOOK WINDS by Donald W. Beran WISP Report No. 4 Grant WBG-59 With United States Department of Commerce Environmental Sciences Service Administration National Environmental Satellite Center Project Leader: Elmar R. Reiter Professor, Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Atmospheric Science Technical Paper No. 75 March 1966 ABSTRACT Four types of chinooks are described: (1) warming of parcel due to subsidence, (2) warming due to latent heat gain on windward side of mountains, (3) wave action at interface of cold surface air and warmer air aloft, and (4) nocturnal chinooks. The suggestion made by Scorer and Klieforth (1959) that large amplitude lee waves could be a possible driving mechanism for chinook or foehn winds is investigated for two cases which occurred in the Rocky Mountains. It is shown that there is a relation between the stability of the surface inversion layer on the windward side of the mountains, and the area under the influence of chinook winds on the leeward side. Flow patterns at 250 mb and 700 mb were analyzed along with the moisture flux at 700 mb. The analyses of wind field, mass diverg­ ence, vorticity, and divergence of moisture were compared with TIROS photographs over the mountains. ii -3- PARCEL AT TEMPERATURE (Tj) ~ m;:FiOR~ DESCENT IS COOLER THAN (TI , 6 -----.~----- TEMPERATURE (li' IS of'~~----..!.I.....
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Burst - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 3
    Heat burst - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 3 Heat burst From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In meteorology, a heat burst is a rare atmospheric phenomenon characterised by gusty winds and a rapid increase in temperature and decrease in dew point (moisture). Heat bursts typically occur during night- time and are associated with decaying thunderstorms.[1] Although this phenomenon is not fully understood, it is theorized that the event is caused when rain evaporates (virga) into a parcel of cold dry air high in the atmosphere making the air denser than its surroundings.[2] The parcel descends rapidly, warming due to compression, overshoots its equilibrium level and reaches the surface, similar to a downburst.[3] Recorded temperatures during heat bursts have reached well above 90 °F (32 °C), sometimes rising by 20 °F (11 °C) or more within only a few minutes. More extreme events have also been documented, where temperatures have been reported to exceed 188 °F (87 °C), although such extreme events have never been officially verified. Heat bursts are also characterised by extremely dry air and are sometimes associated with very strong, even damaging, winds. Some documented cases ■ Wichita, Kansas, June 9, 2011: Temperatures rose from the lower 85'F to 102'F at about 1:00am. The heat burst caused some wind damage (40-50 mph) and local residents reported the phenomenon to area weather stations. [4] ■ Sioux Falls, South Dakota, August 3, 2008: Temperatures rose rapidly from the lower 70s (20s) to 101 °F (38.3 °C) in a matter of minutes.
    [Show full text]