Rumi Georgetown Furniture Co. 1245-1247 Wisconsin Ave

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rumi Georgetown Furniture Co. 1245-1247 Wisconsin Ave Senate Is Expected Cavalrymen Smash struck railyards at Graz on the main To Toss Work Issue Into line from Vienaa to Yugoslavia and Siegfried Line, at Klagenfurt, just north of the Yugoslav border. Plying Portresses On also bombed the yards at Perrara in Conference Table Break German Hold the Po Valley and Liberators at- By J. A. O’LEARY. By THOBURN WIANT, tacked other rail targets at Padua Assailing the Senate version Associated Press War Correspondent. and Udine. Thunderbolts strafed trains moving in Northern Italy. of the manpower bill as a WITH THE 3d ARMY CAVALRY- The “monstrosity,” Senator Chandler, MEN IN GERMANY, Feb. 24.—One German radio dragged antl- of the western Rus.-iar. propaganda into Its at- Democrat, of Kentucky, said last front’s most daring operations was staged tempt to explain away the tremen- night that it “ought to be sent by cavalry- men who smashed nearly two miles dous air assaults by suggesting that back to committee” for study. into the Siegfried Line in two and British and American commands The Kentuckian that explained a half hours, starting the breakup had undertaken the "scorched earth” some committee members who voted of German resistance in the bulge campaign with massed air fleets in to report out the bill reserved the northeast of Vianden. order to destroy everything possible right to of it on the before it fell Into the hands of the oppose parts The Germans were so confused by Red Army and could be exploited floor. The measure will be brought the bold thrusts yesterday that they by the Soviets. up for debate in the Senate to- wandered around out of communica- morrow'. tion with each other. Before the Declaring that "the committee day was over, more than 1,000-pris- GOP Women to Hear Mundt ought to make up its mind before oners were taken. Representative Mundt, Republi- The the Senate passes the bill,” Senator cavalrymen sparred adroitly can. of South Dakota will speak at with the Germans three days after a Chandler told reporters that he dinner meeting of the Montgom- i taking a four-mile square chunk of Women’s Club plans to find out how much support ery County Wednes- the eastern bank of the Our River day night at the Woman's Club of a motion to recommit would receive. | opposite Vianden—the last part of Bethesda. will follow. other Dancing However, reliable sources j Luxembourg liberated. During nearly doubted that the chamber would every war, armies have passed I send the measure back to com- through this picturesque old world mittee. town. Seems lip to Conferees. Sparring Tactics Used. Indications were that the Senate Lt. Cols. Samuel Goodwin of! will pass the measure before the end Washington, D. C., and Walter Day of this week, however, and let con- of' Mount Pleasant, Tenn., used ferees make the final decision as be- sparring tactics to throw the Ger- mans off balance. The worked tween the House work-or-jail bill plan ! so well that cavalrymen broke into and the Senate substitute, w’hich AMERICANS SWEEP ACROSS ROER—American troops in a new offensive sweeping across the 10 German towns during the first War Roer River have captured Baal, Boslar and Niederzier, among 30 towns and villages. They also j merely strengthens existing 10 hours. hold Juelich and have cleared half of Dueren. Broken line is battlefront. Manpower Commission controls. approximate Two principal spearheads through < —AP The House bill empowered draft Wirephoto. the Line were directed — Siegfried by j boards to order men 18 to 45 to Maj. Walter McKenzie of Monte- in or * j stay go to essential jobs, sub- Russia Western Front zuma, Ga„ and Capt. Shealy McCoy j ject to a penalty up to $10,000 or Allied Action of Athens, Ga five (Continued From First Spreads (Continued From First years in prison. Page.) Page.)_ Instead of using horses, the pop- The Senate bill seeks to channel ular conception of the cavalrymen's: being thrown back to "the outer Roer, and heavy equipment, anti- men and women regardless of age mode of travel, some used armored : town ring." On Italian Front tank guns, troops and supplies into jobs where they are needed by j vehicles and tanks. Others, acting Berlin said the Russians were By the Associated Press. poured across in a steady stream. placing labor ceilings on industry,! | as infantrymen, walked. using “several army corps" and that The German chance to smash the but with penalties only on employ- ROME, Feb. 24— Allied activity Maj. McKenzie's band took off Visit America’s these had been ordered to take the was gone. ers who hire anyone in violation of | intended to tie down a maximum bridgehead several miles north of Vianden city quickly. Russian artillery bar- j War Manpower Commission rules I number of German divisions spread Canadians Attach Again. through a maze of concrete and rages had been stepped up, and steel Exclusive and on certain farm workers. The along the 5th Army front in Italy Associated Press Correspondent Siegfried Line pillboxes. They j Only Berlin acknowledged that German went so fast that employer penalty is $10,000 nr tne today, accompanied by a continued Wes Gallagher said from the front many Germans; nests inside Breslau had been in but the farm-determent w'iped aerial offensive from Italian bases there was ho indication of a Ger- in the boxes did not know what was Hotel year jail, * IT’S GOOD TO BE Jack Training out by the Russians. HOME—Sergt. Ruehlman, 19, B-17 Learn how YOU can a amendment that if against the enemy's southern Euro- man stand, and the 9th "might well happening. Others were so surprised L ■ provides an who was the enjoy the thrill of S I* H A A I The Nazi believed to that were unable to gunner repatriated Wednesday aboard exchange u x u agricultural worker is found un- garrison pean communications. punch through the so-far feeble they do any-1 colorful 1 rious V V II U II I hotel life. You can number 100.000 men United to Rhine in thing. As a German liner Gripsholm, shown as he arrived at Union Station last acceptable to the Army and then fought savagely States infantrymen and German defenses the consequence qualify quickly through Lewis Training. leaves he to hold Breslau and delay the Rus- Brazilian troops consolidated their hours or days." resistance was light. night. His sister, Mildred, 20 (left), and his mother, Mrs. Earn while you learn! Prepare now for farming, would be iiable a WELL-PAID POSITION and Post-War sian advances on Berlin and Dres- Frances 3330 street met him in New York. to a $10,000 fine or five years im- newly-won heights around Monte Marshal Montgomery's Canadian Germans Bewildered. Thornton, Ames N.E., Career in this essential business. den. Belvedere. 30 miles southwest of Ruehlman lost his and his when his Day and Classes prisonment. 1st Army on the north end of the Other Sergt. leg right eye plane EYening Marshal K. K. Rokossovsky's 2nd Bologna. American cavalrymen under Capt. Home Course Some Penalties. raiding parties front lashed out in new attacks. was shot down over Germany during July.—Star Staff Photo. Study Oppose on McCoy went through the Siegfried Call, write or phone for FREE ROOK. White Russian Army attacking punched into German fortified Reconnaissance forces al- As the Senate prepared to start prodded area Vianden. The Ger- Open Mon., Wed., Fri. to 8 P.M. Tees.* a 70-mile front gained up to 7 south of opposite reserves from Thurs. to 4 for Mt. the | holdings Bologna. Farther most to the road center of Calcar bringing up the south P.M. Ask Shaw. manpower debate, some Sena- from their mans again were completely bewil- miles previous positions, i to the right, artillery fire blasted without resistance. (Brussels radio in an effort to meet the American Lewis Hotel School tors were to move to Training making plans : 10 localities in the Polish dered. Capt. James Burke, formerly capturing the enemy from some positions. said the Canadians had entered U-Boaf Pens Blasted, 9th Army offensive. 2301 Pa. Are. N.W, ME. 4692. Eat. 23 strike out both the employer and of Norwich Mass., led two Corridor and in Pomerania on the Key points in the network of rail- College. the farm labor Calcar.) lank The 9th Air Force listed 'losses court penalties. west. roads in companies around the right Northern Italy essential for of seven medium or bombers If the $10,000 fine or one year; On the center of that front, Scot- end, leading to even greater Ger- light Push on Danzig. an enemy withdrawal behind the Oil Plants Struck in and three bombers. WANTED imprisonment penalty is eliminated.! tish infantry’ fought to within a man confusion. Among the first fighter town Alps were left smoldering by more the bill still would contain economic Flanking the Vistula River mile of Weeze, a railhead 3 miles through the dragon's teeth was Lt. Rail targets not hit in the previous than 60 hours of day and night penalties on the employer, under!; of Gniew one Soviet group seized south of -the captured West Wall Edwin Kenny of Atlanta, Ga. two-day '‘buckshot blitz” which par- NEWSPAPERS bombing by American and British 12th which any wages he paid to a Dzierzazno. 4 miles east of Gniew stropgpoint of Goch. of alyzed the transportation network work-j warplanes. Capt, Robert Williams of East Day Raiding er in violation of employment ceil- and 33 miles south of Danzig.
Recommended publications
  • Political, Diplomatic and Military Aspects of Romania's Participation in the First World War
    Volume XXI 2018 ISSUE no.2 MBNA Publishing House Constanta 2018 SBNA PAPER OPEN ACCESS Political, diplomatic and military aspects of romania's participation in the first world war To cite this article: M. Zidaru, Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, Vol. XXI 2018, pg. 202-212. Available online at www.anmb.ro ISSN: 2392-8956; ISSN-L: 1454-864X doi: 10.21279/1454-864X-18-I2-026 SBNA© 2018. This work is licensed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License Political, diplomatic and military aspects of romania's participation in the first world war M. Zidaru1 1Romanian Society of Historian. Constanta Branch Abstract: Although linked to the Austro-Hungarian Empire by a secret alliance treaty in 1883, Romania chose to declare itself neutral at the outbreak of hostilities in July 1914, relying on the interpretation of the "casus foederis" clauses. The army was in 1914 -1915 completely unprepared for such a war, public opinion, although pro-Entente in most of it, was not ready for this kind of war, and Ion I. C. Bratianu was convinced that he had to obtain a written assurance from the Russian Empire in view of his father's unpleasant experience from 1877-1878. This article analyze the political and military decisions after Romania entry in Great War. Although linked to the Austro-Hungarian Empire by a secret alliance treaty in 1883, Romania chose to declare itself neutral at the outbreak of hostilities in July 1914, relying on the interpretation of the "casus foederis" clauses. In the south, Romania has three major strategic interests in this region: - defense of the long Danubian border and the land border between the Danube and the Black Sea; - the keep open of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, through which 90% of the Romanian trade were made; - avoiding the isolation or political encirclement of Romania by keeping open the Thessaloniki-Nis- Danube communication, preventing its blocking as a result of local conflicts or taking over under strict control by one of the great powers in the region[1].
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulge Rules-48
    The First World War, 1914–1918 1 RULES BOOKLET - Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................. 2 9.0 Strategy Cards ......................... 7 14.0 Supply ..................................... 18 2.0 Components.............................. 2 9.1 General Rules .......................... 7 14.1 General Rules ........................ 18 2.1 The Game Map ....................... 2 9.2 Operations ............................... 7 14.2 Supply Sources ..................... 18 2.2 The Playing Pieces .................. 2 9.3 Strategic Redeployment .......... 8 14.3 Out of Supply Effects ........... 18 2.3 The Strategy Cards.................. 3 9.4 Replacement Points................. 8 15.0 Forts ........................................ 19 2.4 Unit Abbreviations .................. 3 9.5 Event ....................................... 8 15.1 General Rules ........................ 19 2.5 Questions?............................... 3 10.0 Stacking .................................. 10 15.2 Besieging .............................. 19 3.0 Symbols and Terminology....... 3 10.1 General Rules ........................ 10 15.3 Siege Resolution ................... 19 4.0 Game Set-up ............................. 4 11.0 Movement ............................... 10 16.0 War and Peace ....................... 19 4.1 Marker Set-Up ........................ 4 11.1 General Rules ........................ 10 16.1 Player War Status .................. 19 4.2 Unit Set-Up ............................. 4 11.2 Trenches ................................ 11 16.2
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army After the Battle of Kursk by Walter S
    The German Army after the Battle of Kursk By Walter S. Zapotoczny The Wehrmacht’s strength and combat effectiveness in the east after the Battle of Kursk entered a period of steady decline. Sporadic arrivals of new conscripts and equipment, especially for the mechanized units and the Waffen SS, gave the German defenders the means to conduct local counterattacks. These attacks were steadily less effective, both due to the growing superiority of the Soviet troops and the steady decay in the level of German training and effectiveness. The German infantry formations were even more emaciated than their mechanized counterparts were. This period marked the full development of Soviet force structure, equipment, and operational and tactical concepts. August 23, 1944 proved to be one of the decisive days of the entire war. With the Russian tanks on the Prut River and more racing south for the Focsani gap in Romania, the fate of the entire German Army Group South was uncertain. This was proof of the massive and effective Russian battlefield performance in Moldavia and Bessarabia. This alone, however, did not make this day so historic. What changed the fortune of Germany’s entire southeastern theater was the coup carried out that day in Bucharest, when King Michael had the Antonescu brothers arrested and Romania ceased to fight alongside Germany. Rumanian troops were instructed to cease firing on the Red Army and King Michael surrendered unconditionally to the Allies. The Rumanian defection turned Germany’s military defeat into a catastrophe, which made it felt far beyond the limits of a single Army Group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Army and the Conduct of Operations in 1914
    British Journal for Military History, Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2016 The Russian Army and the Conduct of Operations in 1914 STEPHEN WALSH Royal Military Academy Sandhurst Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The scale of the fighting on the Eastern Front in 1914 is reasonably familiar but the Russian campaign of 1914, apart from Tannenberg, is poorly understood. The Russian Army’s military strategy, the choices it made, what it was trying to achieve, why and how, are not well known. This article will analyse Russian strategy and operations in a thematic rather than narrative manner, placing the Russian conduct of operations in the context of Russian military thinking at the time. It will argue that the relative importance of the East Prussian and Galician Operations has been misunderstood, especially the Russian operations in northern Galicia. In late August 1914, the Russian Army faced strategic catastrophe on the entire Eastern Front, not because of events in East Prussia, but in northern Galicia where the chronic lack of correlation between ends and means in Russian military strategy became acute. The Russian high command’s desire to launch a third operation into eastern Germany, in August 1914, distorted Russian strategy to the point where the Russian Army flirted with catastrophe in northern Galicia, a brush with disaster that rescued Russian strategy from its own illusions, enabling them to defeat the Austrians and force the German Army into a sustained two- front war. ‘The history of the campaign of 1914 is nothing else but the story of the consequences of the strategical errors of the War Plan’1 On 31 July 1914, Tsar Nicholas II authorised the mobilisation of the Russian Army, a defining moment2 in the sequence of events that began the First World War, a war 1 N.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University
    Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University The Last Battle Inventory List First published by Simon & Schuster in 1966. The Last Battle has been translated into Arabic, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Japanese, Latvian, Norwegian, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Serbo-Croatian, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish. Table of Contents Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University ..... 1 Initial Research ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Allied Political and Military Leadership ............................................................................................................................... 6 American Forces .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 French Forced Labor ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 German Civilians ............................................................................................................................................................... 30 German Forces ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The First World War
    The First World War (Outline) Many different opinions on some questions (for example): - Why did it start? - Why couldn’t they stop it? - Who was to blame? - Why did the pre-war plans all fail? - How important was the American contribution? - Were the generals (generally) dumb? - Was the German Army actually defeated? - Could the war have been continued after Nov. 1918? - Should the Allies have pressed on into Germany? Part 1: The War Begins, 1914 (The Tinderbox Explodes) I. Set up and causes 1. FEAR!!! 2. Ism’s a. Nationalism (Jingoism) b. Imperialism (Colonialism) c. Militarism (War Plans: Schlieffen Plan, Plan XVII, etc:) d. Pan-Slavism and Pan-Germanism 3. Other general factors a. Arms race (specifically the Naval Arms Race) b. Population pressure in Germany (Lebensraum) II. Individual Countries and where they stood 1. Italy (to be treated as a great power) 2. Turkey (Regain N. Africa, Balkans, and long-standing enemy of Russia) 3. Austria-Hungary (To survive as an empire and fear of Russia) 4. Germany (To hold a “place in the sun” + fear of two front war) 5. Russia (Pan-Slavism, Lebensraum, and to regain lost prestige) 6. France (Regain Alsace & Lorraine + fear of Germany) 7. England (Maintain her empire, supremacy of the RN & integrity of international rule of law; channel ports) III. The spark initiates an inferno (“some damn foolish thing in the Balkans”) 1. Assassination of the Arch-Duke (ho-hum) 2. Austria decides to punish Serbia 3. Gets a “BLANK CHECK” from Germany 4. Austria issues ultimatum and mobilizes 5. Willie/Nicky telegrams 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 29-An Army in an Army
    1 1945 July 16-22 An Army in the Army (La Crosse Tribune, 1945 July 22, page 12) 2 In June and July 1945, there were many newspaper articles about La Crosse County men and women being brought back to the United States for reassignment or being discharged to civilian life. There are undoubtedly more to come the rest of the year. The article above, concerning Private First Class Louis Gueltzow of La Crosse, is typical. Gueltzow was a member of the 345th Infantry Regiment of the 87th Infantry Division. At various times, the 345th Infantry Regiment, as part of the 87th Infantry Division, was part of the 7th, 9th, 1st, and 3rd Armies in the European Theater. The concept of Armies in the Army may be confusing, so what does all of this mean? The key to understanding the nomenclature, and also appreciating the scope of World War II, is decoding the hierarchical structure of the United States armed forces, in this case the United States Army. Since United States Army infantry divisions were the most numerous units in World War II, this analysis will use them as an example. Squad = 8-12 men: commanded by a Corporal or a Sergeant Platoon = 3-4 squads: commanded by a 2nd Lieutenant (48-50 men) Company = 3-4 platoons: commanded by a 1st Lieutenant or Captain (150-200 men) Battalion = 3-4 companies: commanded by a Major (800 men) Regiment = 3 battalions: commanded by a Lt. Colonel (2,400 men) Division = 3 regiments: commanded by a Lt. [3-star] or Major [2-star] General (10,000 - 15,000 men) Corps = 2 or more divisions: commanded by a Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigg Bm.Pdf (651.5Kb)
    notes note on sources Although oral testimonies are subject to fallible human memories, they have none- theless proven invaluable in explaining several documents collected for this study. Documents never before seen by historians, found in people’s closets, basements, and desk drawers, created a much fuller and complex history, especially when their owners supplied the background and history of the documents as well. These sources helped re-create the unique and tragic history of the Mischlinge, which is still so little understood over half a century later. The thousands of pages of documents and oral testimonies (on 8 mm video and VHS video) in this study are now part of the permanent collection at the Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv in Freiburg, Germany, as the Bryan Mark Rigg Collection. Although interviews need to be treated with some skepticism, they have repeatedly shown that oral history often enriches rather than contradicts historical documents. All too often, history is written without the human element, that is, without knowing what these people thought, felt, and believed. Oral history helps reconstruct many of these people’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs through their diaries, letters, interviews, and photographs. In this way, a healthy combination of hard documents or primary sources and secondary sources and testimonies expands our sense of this history. Often one reads about men and women but feels no human connection with them. The interviews were done to try to bridge this gap and to pro- vide readers with the means to enter these men’s and women’s thoughts and feelings to understand them better and to deepen readers’ knowledge of this history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Plans for the North Western Theatre of Operations in 1939-1944
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE SOVIET PLANS FOR THE NORTH WESTERN THEATRE OF OPERATIONS IN 1939-1944 Ohto Manninen National Defence College Helsinki 2004 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Pekka Sivonen Editorial Assistant: Harri Valtonen Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Prof. Ohto Manninen, National Defence College Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr. Kalevi Ruhala Dr. Col. (ret.) PekkaVisuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 7 SF-00861 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 16 The Soviet Plans for the North Western Theatre of Operations in 1939-1944 Ohto Manninen National Defence College Helsinki 2004 ISBN 951-25-1476-1 ISSN 0788 5571 Edita Prima Oy Helsinki 2004 FOREWORD In this study my intention has been to analyse the operation plans made by the Red Army for the Finnish theatre of war in the eve of and during the Second World War. During my visits in Russia to research in the former Soviet archives it was not possible to see the origi- nal plans for operations. It was pointed out to me that the "ground level vegetation" is still the same in the border areas of Russia and Finland. This, of course, was a friendly way of saying to me that the legislation still forbids of giving those materials for researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Aviation in the First World War
    Mihail ORZEAÞÃ • Valeriu AVRAM ROMANIAN MILITARY THINKING ROMANIAN AVIATION IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR Professor Mihail ORZEAȚĂ, PhD „Apollonia” University, Iaşi Professor Valeriu AVRAM, PhD Romanians are among the pioneers of heavier-than-air flight, being also among the first in the world to use aircraft for military purposes. However, the efforts and creativity of Romanian aviation pioneers were not properly appreciated by the political and military leaders of their time. At the outbreak of the war the Romanian Crown Council decided to keep the country neutral. Romania signed a treaty with the Entente because the Alliance pledged support to the unification of all Romanians into a single state. Counting on the Entente’s promises to launch offensive operations in Thessaloniki and in Bucovina, the Great General Headquarters of the Romanian Armed Forces developed a risky concept of operations in order to enter the war by launching offensive in two divergent directions. This risky strategy implemented alongside the unfavourable evolution of the strategic situation of the Entente on both Eastern and Western fronts resulted in defeat for the Romanian Armed Forces in 1916. The additional effect of the defeats was the occupation of two thirds of the Romanian territory by German troops. Having a new organisational structure and better equipment and training, the Romanian aviation contributed to the successes in the battles of Mărăști, Mărăşeşti and Oituz in July and August 1917. Russia’s decision to exit the war contributed to the decision of the Romanian Council of Ministers to sign the Peace Treaty with the Central Powers in May 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reports of Trial of War Criminals, Volume XII
    LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION VOLUME XII THE GERMAN HIGH COMMAND TRIAL LONDON PUBLISHED FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1949 Price 5S. od. net. LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS SELECTED AND PREPARED BY THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION I One of the aims of this series of Reports is to relate in summary form the course of the most important of the proceedings taken I' against persons accused of committing war crimes during the Second [I World War, apart from the major war criminals tried by the ,I Nuremberg and Tokyo International Military Tribunals, but ;1 'I including those tried by United States Military Tribunals at I Nuremberg. Of necessity, the trials reported in these volumes are examples only, since the trials conducted before the various Allied Courts of which the Commission has had record, number about 1,600. The trials selected for reporting, however, are ~hose which are thought to be of the greatest interest legally and in which important points of municipal and international law arose and were settled. Each report, however, contains not only the outline of the proceedings in the trial under review, but also, in a separate section headed" Notes on the Case ", such comments of an explanatory nature on the legal matters arising in that trial as it has been thought useful to include. These notes provide also, at suitable points, general summaries and analyses of the decisions of the courts on specific points of law derived primarily from a study of relevant trials already reported upon in the series.
    [Show full text]