DOCSLIB.ORG

Orsted Hornsea Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orsted Hornsea Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2018 Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Statement: Volume 6, Annex 3.1 – Desk Study and Phase 1 Habitat Survey PINS Document Reference: A6.6.3.1 APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Date: May 2018 Annex 3.1 – Desk Study and Phase 1 Habitat Survey Environmental Statement May 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Statement Liability Volume 6 Annex 3.1. – Desk Study and Phase 1 Habitat Survey This report has been prepared by RPS, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of their contracts with Orsted Power (UK) Ltd. Report Number: A6.6.3.1 Version: Final Date: May 2018 This report is also downloadable from the Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm website at: www.hornseaproject3.co.uk Ørsted, Prepared by: RPS 5 Howick Place, Checked by: Sarah Drljaca London, SW1P 1WG Accepted by: Sophie Banham © Orsted Power (UK) Ltd., 2018. All rights reserved Approved by: Stuary Livesey Front cover picture: Kite surfer near a UK offshore wind farm © Orsted Hornsea Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2018. i Annex 3.1 – Desk Study and Phase 1 Habitat Survey Environmental Statement May 2018 Table of Contents Table C.3: PHA4. ............................................................................................................................................... 118 Table C.4: PHA5. ............................................................................................................................................... 119 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table C.5: PHA6. ............................................................................................................................................... 120 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table C.6: PHA7. ............................................................................................................................................... 121 2. Methods ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table C.7: PHA8. ............................................................................................................................................... 121 Table C.8: PHB3. ............................................................................................................................................... 122 2.1 Desk study ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table C.9: PHB4. ............................................................................................................................................... 122 2.2 Phase 1 habitat survey ................................................................................................................................ 2 Table C.10: PHB5. ............................................................................................................................................... 123 2.3 Limitations ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Table C.11: PHB6. ............................................................................................................................................... 123 3. Desk study results ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Table C.12: PHB7. ............................................................................................................................................... 123 3.2 Non-statutory designated sites .................................................................................................................... 2 Table C.13: PHB8. ............................................................................................................................................... 124 Table C.14: PHC1. ............................................................................................................................................... 124 3.3 Protected and other notable species ......................................................................................................... 17 Table C.15: PHE1. ............................................................................................................................................... 125 4. Phase 1 habitat survey Results ......................................................................................................................... 26 Table C.16: PHF1 ................................................................................................................................................ 125 5. References ........................................................................................................................................................ 58 Table C.17: PHF2. ............................................................................................................................................... 127 Appendix A Thomson Ecology Additional Phase 1 Habitat Survey Report 2017 ................................................. 59 Table C.18: PHF3. ............................................................................................................................................... 129 Appendix B Thomson Ecology Phase 1 Habitat Survey – Assessment Methodology ....................................... 117 Table C.19: PHG1. ............................................................................................................................................... 130 Table C.20: PHG2. ............................................................................................................................................... 130 Appendix C Thomson Ecology Phase 1 Habitat Survey – Plant species and abundance ................................. 118 Table C.21: PHG3. ............................................................................................................................................... 131 Table C.22: PHG5. ............................................................................................................................................... 131 List of Tables Table C.23: PHG6 ................................................................................................................................................ 132 Table C.24: PHG7. ............................................................................................................................................... 132 Table 2.1: Summary of key desktop sources. ........................................................................................................ 1 Table C.25: PHG8. ............................................................................................................................................... 133 Table 3.1: Statutory designated sites within 2 km of the onshore elements of Hornsea Three (as defined at PEIR stage). .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Table 3.2: Non-statutory designated sites within 2 km of the onshore elements of Hornsea Three (as defined at PEIR stage). ......................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures Table 3.3: Summary of protected and notable plant species recorded within 2 km of the onshore elements of Hornsea Three (as defined at PEIR stage). ........................................................................................ 17 Figure 4.1: Location of designated sites. .............................................................................................................. 27 Table 3.4: Summary of protected and notable invertebrate species recorded within 2 km of the onshore Figure 4.2: Protected plant records. ..................................................................................................................... 36 elements of Hornsea Three (as defined at PEIR stage). .................................................................... 18 Figure 4.3: Location of protected or otherwise notable terrestrial invertebrate records. ....................................... 37 Table 3.5: Summary of aquatic invertebrate and fish species recorded within 2 km of the onshore elements of Figure 4.4: Location of fish and aquatic invertebrate records. .............................................................................. 38 Hornsea Three (as defined at PEIR stage). ........................................................................................ 20 Figure 4.5: Location of amphibian and reptile records. ......................................................................................... 39 Table 3.6: Summary of herpetofauna species recorded within 2 km of the onshore elements of Hornsea Three Figure 4.6: Location of bird records. ..................................................................................................................... 40 (as defined at PEIR stage).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • ESSD Appendix D Datasheet
    Envirocheck ® Report: Datasheet Order Details: Order Number: 254632812_1_1 Customer Reference: TAR/MG/LBA/5630/01 National Grid Reference: 621960, 302820 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 21.31 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details: Site at Mangreen Hall Norfolk Client Details: J Amphlett MJCA Baddesley Collier Offices Main Road Baxterley Atherstone Warwickshire CV9 2LE Order Number: 254632812_1_1 Date: 27-Aug-2020 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Contents Report Section Page Number Summary - Agency & Hydrological 1 Waste 38 Hazardous Substances - Geological 39 Industrial Land Use 42 Sensitive Land Use 43 Data Currency 44 Data Suppliers 48 Useful Contacts 49 Introduction The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client. In this datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 29 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fibiger Michael, Sammut Paul M., Seguna Anthony, Catania Aldo Artikel/Article: Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies 193-213 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 29(3/4): 193-213 193 Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies Michael Fibiger Paul Sammut-, Anthony Seguna \ & Aldo Catania^ ' Molbecha Allé 49, 4180 Sor0, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] 2 137, 'Fawkner/2\ Dingli Rd., Rabat, RBT 07, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Redeemer', Triq 1-Emigrant, Naxxar, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Rama Rama', Triq Möns. Anton Cilia, Zebbug, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Recent records of Noctuoidea from Malta are given. Five noctuid species are recorded from Europe for the first time: Eublemma conistrota Hampson, 1910, Eiiblemma deserti Rothschild, 1909, Anumeta hilgerti (Rothschild 1909), Hadiila deserticula (Hampson 1905), and Eiixoa canariensis Rebel, 1902. New synonyms are stated: Leptosia velocissima f. tarda Turati, 1926, syn. n. and Leptosia griseimargo Warren, 1912, syn. n., both synonyms of Metachrostis velox (Hübner, 1813); and Pseudohadena (Eremohadena) roseonitens espugnensis Lajonquiere, 1964, syn. n., a synonym of P. (E.) roseonitens roseonitens (Oberthür, 1887). A new subspecies of Xylena exsoleta (Linneaus, 1758), Xylena exsoleta maltensis ssp. n., is established. The literature on Maltese Noctuoidea is reviewed and erronuousely reported species are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Local Plan
    Greater Norwich Local Plan Regulation 18 Draft Plan Consultation Response Form Thank you for responding to the Regulation 18 Draft Plan Consultation on the emerging Greater Norwich Local Plan. The current consultation runs from. 29th January to 16th March 2020. It covers the Strategy and Site Allocations. We need to get views on these documents to help us draw up the version of the plan which will be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. When commenting on a policy or site, please include the site reference(s) in your comments. If you have any questions relating to the consultation please contact the Greater Norwich Local Plan team on 01603 306603 or email [email protected] It is easier to respond online at www.gnlp.org.uk . If you cannot do this, please use this form to respond to the consultation on new, revised and small sites. Consultation documents are available from www.gnlp.org.uk. There are also supporting documents which provide information on our policies and sites which may help you to make your comments. Hard copies of the documents are available at consultation “Deposit Points” at: o County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich (main reception); o City Hall, St Peters Street, Norwich (2nd floor reception); o Broadland District Council, Thorpe Road, Thorpe St Andrew (main reception); o South Norfolk Council, Cygnet Court, Long Stratton (main reception). 1 Submitting your Response Form Responses should be submitted by email to [email protected] or completed hard copy forms should be sent to: Greater Norwich Local Plan Team PO Box 3466 Norwich NR7 7NX All submissions should be made no later than 5pm on Monday 16th March 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Document No.: PB8164-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010
    Title: Dudgeon and Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm Extensions Preliminary Environmental Information Report Chapter 28 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Document no.: PB8164-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 Date: Classification 29th April 2021 Final Prepared by: LDA Approved by: Date: Jo Rodriguez, Equinor 29th April 2021 Page 2 of 151 Classification: Open Status: Final www.equinor.com Doc. No. PB8164-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z--0010 Rev. no. 4 Table of Contents 28 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ....................................... 12 28.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 12 28.2 Consultation. ....................................................................................................... 12 28.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 26 28.4 Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................................................... 39 28.5 Existing Environment .......................................................................................... 62 28.6 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................. 85 28.7 Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................... 116 28.8 Transboundary Impacts .................................................................................... 129 28.9 Inter-relationships .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • England Biodiversity Indicators 2020
    4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance England Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This documents supports 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document Fiona Burns, Tom August, Mark Eaton, David Noble, Gary Powney, Nick Isaac, Daniel Hayhow For further information on 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance visit https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/england-biodiversity-indicators 1 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Indicator 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document, 2020 NB this paper should be read together with 4b Status of UK Priority Species; distribution which presents a companion statistic based on time series on frequency of occurrence (distribution) of priority species. 1. Introduction The adjustments to the UK biodiversity indicators set as a result of the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (including the Aichi Targets) at the 10th Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity mean there is a need to report progress against Aichi Target 12: Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. Previously, the UK biodiversity indicator for threatened species used lead partner status assessments on the status of priority species from 3-yearly UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) reporting rounds. As a result of the devolution of biodiversity strategies to the UK's 4 nations, there is no longer reporting at the UK level of the status of species previously listed by the BAP process. This paper presents a robust indicator of the status of threatened species in the UK, with species identified as conservation priorities being taken as a proxy for threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuid Moth (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Communities in Urban Parks of Warsaw
    POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA MEMORABILIA ZOOL. 42 125-148 1986 GRAŻYNA WINIARSKA NOCTUID MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN URBAN PARKS OF WARSAW ABSTRACT A total of 40 noctuid moth species were recorded in four parks of Warsaw. Respective moth communities consisted of a similar number of species (17—25), but differed in their abundance index (3.5 —7.9). In all the parks, the dominant species were Autographa gamma and Discrestra trifolii. The subdominant species were represented by Acronicta psi, Trachea atriplicis, Mamestra suasa, Mythimna pallens, and Catocala nupta. There were differences in the species composition and dominance structure among noctuid moth communities in urban parks, suburban linden- oak-hornbeam forest, and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forest. In the suburban and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forests, the number of species was higher by 40% and their abundance wao 5 — 9 times higher than in the urban parks. The species predominating in parks occurred in very low numbers in suburban and natural habitats. Only T. atriplicis belonged to the group of most abundant species in all the habitats under study. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the interest of ecologists in urban habitats has been increasing as they proved to be rich in plant and animal species. The vegetation of urban green areas is sufficiently well known since its species composition and spatial structure are shaped by gardening treatment. But the fauna of these areas is poorly known, and regular zoological investigations in urban green areas were started not so long ago, when urban green was recognized as one of the most important factors of the urban “natural” habitat (Ciborowski 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records
    Moth species list Froyle Records extracted 9th December 2012 from the moth databases held by the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Branch of Butterfly Conservation. Contains Lepidoptera records in the Froyle Parish, Hampshire. Taxon Vernacular Abrostola tripartita Spectacle Acasis viretata Yellow-barred Brindle Acleris forsskaleana Acleris variegana Garden Rose Tortrix Adaina microdactyla Adela rufimitrella Agapeta hamana Agonopterix arenella Agonopterix heracliana Agriopis leucophaearia Spring Usher Agriopis marginaria Dotted Border Agriphila straminella Agrochola lota Red-line Quaker Agrochola macilenta Yellow-line Quaker Agrotis exclamationis Heart and Dart Agrotis puta Shuttle-shaped Dart Alcis repandata Mottled Beauty Allophyes oxyacanthae Green-brindled Crescent Alucita hexadactyla Twenty-plume Moth Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Amphipyra pyramidea Copper Underwing Amphipyra pyramidea agg. Copper Underwing agg. Anthophila fabriciana Anticlea badiata Shoulder Stripe Anticlea derivata Streamer Apamea crenata Clouded-bordered Brindle Apamea epomidion Clouded Brindle Apamea monoglypha Dark Arches Apamea sordens Rustic Shoulder-knot Apeira syringaria Lilac Beauty Aphomia sociella Bee Moth Aplocera efformata Lesser Treble-bar Archips podana Large Fruit-tree Tortrix Asteroscopus sphinx Sprawler Autographa gamma Silver Y Autographa pulchrina Beautiful Golden Y Axylia putris Flame Batia unitella Biston betularia Peppered Moth Biston strataria Oak Beauty Blastobasis adustella Page 1 of 7 Blastobasis lacticolella Cabera exanthemata Common Wave Cabera
    [Show full text]
  • City of N O Rwich H Igh S Chool / Ecology S Urvey / Report for N PS
    City of Norwich High School / Ecology Survey / Report for NPS South East Ltd City of Norwich High School City of Norwich High School, Norfolk. Ecology Survey Survey / Ecology / Report for NPS South East Ltd Report for NPS South East Ltd South East Report for NPS Author JI Thacker PhD Job No. 111063 Reviewed by Approved by Date Initial GW Hopkins S Phillips 120112 The Ecology Consultancy 79 Thorpe Road, Norwich, NR1 1UA T. 01603 628408 E. [email protected] W. www.ecologyconsultancy.co.uk CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology .................................................................................................. 6 3 Results ........................................................................................................... 9 4 Protected Species Assessment ................................................................... 12 5 Discussion .................................................................................................... 13 References ...................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 1: Figures ........................................................................................ 15 Appendix 2: Photographs ............................................................................... 17 Appendix 3: Legislation & Planning
    [Show full text]