DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Scorecard © Great Southern Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Scorecard © Great Southern Region Community Scorecard © Great Southern Region Prepared for: Great Southern Peer Support Group Prepared by: CATALYSE® Pty Ltd © May 2019 © Copyright CATALYSE® Pty Ltd 2019 Contents Introduction 3 Strategic Insights 7 Overall performance 14 Familiarity with local services and facilities 21 Leadership and communication 24 Natural environment 42 Economic development 50 Community development 57 Community services 64 Art and culture 73 Built environment 78 Overview of community variances 88 Community priorities among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people 91 Introduction The Study In March-April 2019, 11 Councils within the Great Southern % of respondents (weighted) Region administered a MARKYT® Community Scorecard to Home owner 88 Renting / Other 9 evaluate community priorities and measure individual Council Out of area ratepayer 2 performance against key indicators in each Council’s Visitor <1 Male 48 Strategic Community Plan. Female 50 Other <1 Scorecards invitations were posted or emailed to randomly Answered together 1 selected households in the City of Albany and Shire of Have child 0-5 years 15 Multiple response question Have child 6-12 years 16 Denmark and to all households and PO Boxes in all other Have child 13-17 years 11 council areas using Australia Post unaddressed mail services. Have child 18+ years 8 No children living at home 56 Councils supported the study with promotions through their 18-34 years 19 35-54 years 36 communication channels. All residents were invited to 55-64 years 17 complete a scorecard. 65+ years 28 Answered together <1 In total, 2,497 respondents submitted a response; potentially Disability 14 representing 12% of households across the region. ATSI 3 Born overseas + mainly speak LOTE 3 Of these respondents, 181 were council-affiliated and 2,316 Farm / rural 23 Town 71 were non-council affiliated. As analysis of responses from the City of Albany 59 two sample groups showed significant differences in results, Shire of Broomehill Tambellup 2 Shire of Cranbrook 2 the main body of the report presents responses from non- Shire of Denmark 9 council affiliated respondents only. Shire of Gnowangerup 2 Shire of Jerramungup 2 The final dataset was weighted by age, gender and LGA area Shire of Katanning 7 Shire of Kent 1 to match the ABS Census population profile of the region. Shire of Kojonup 3 Data has been analysed using SPSS. Where sub-totals add Shire of Plantagenet 9 Shire of Woodanilling 1 to ±1% of the parts, this is due to rounding errors to zero ATSI = Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander decimal places. LOTE = Language other than English 4 NB: when responses do not add to 100% this is due to non-responses (not shown) Great Southern Region Councils Across the Great Southern Region, 11 councils have partnered with CATALYSE® to conduct a MARKYT® Community Scorecard. 5 Industry Standards CATALYSE® has conducted studies for close to 60 councils across WA. When three or more councils have asked a comparable question, we publish the high score to enable participating councils to recognise and learn from the industry leaders. In this report, the ‘high score’ is calculated from WA councils that have completed an accredited study with CATALYSE® within the past two years. Participating councils are listed below. Metropolitan Regional 6 Strategic Insights Strategic Overview | Great Southern Region Place to Live Place to Visit Organisation Value for Money 79 76 54 41 Performance Index Score Performance Index Score Performance Index Score Performance Index Score 4 index points above the MARKYT® 12 index points above the 2 points below the MARKYT® 4 index points below the MARKYT® Industry Standard for WA. MARKYT® Industry Standard for WA Industry Standards for WA. Industry Standard for WA. Community Advocacy Highest scoring performance areas Economic • Place to live development • Place to visit • Library and information services • Sport and recreation Relative to MARKYT® Industry Standards • Place to visit Road Footpaths, trails Priorities -7 Strengths • Tourism attractions and marketing maintenance and cycleways • Sport and recreation Net Promoter Score • Aboriginal history and heritage 9 points above the MARKYT® • Health and wellbeing Industry Standard for WA. • Education and training 8 Overall Performance | industry comparisons The ‘Overall Performance Index Score’ is a combined measure of ‘place to live’ and Industry Standards ‘governing organisation’ across participating councils. The Great Southern Region’s overall Performance Index Score performance index score is 66 out of 100, 1 index point above the industry standard for Western Australia. The highest score across the Great Southern Region was 74. Overall Performance Index Score average of ‘place to live’ and ‘governing organisation’ Great Southern Region Councils Great Southern Region 66 Western Australian Councils WA High 85 WA Average 65 85 78 75 74 74 74 74 73 72 72 71 70 70 69 68 68 67 67 66 66 66 65 65 63 63 63 WA Average 62 62 61 60 58 58 57 56 56 56 53 51 50 9 How to read the Benchmark Matrix TM The MARKYT® Benchmark Matrix TM (shown in detail overleaf) illustrates how the community rates performance on individual measures, compared to how other councils are being rated by their communities. There are two dimensions. The vertical axis maps community perceptions of performance for individual measures relative to the average score for all measures. The horizontal axis maps performance relative to the MARKYT® Industry Standards. Councils aim to be on the right side of this line, with performance ABOVE the MARKYT® Industry Standard. This line represents region’s average performance for all individual measures. As it represents the average, around half of the service areas will be placed above the line, and around half will be positioned below the line. 10 Copyright CATALYSE® Pty Ltd. © 2019 1 Value for money 2 Council's leadership TM 3 Community advocacy Benchmark Matrix 4 Regional partners 5 Transparency 6 Innovation CELEBRATE 7 Community consultation This chart shows the Region’s Higher Place to live and visit, sport and 8 Informing the community performance in individual service Performance recreation facilities, library services, local 9 Website areas relative to the MARKYT® 10 Social media Industry Standards. and Indigenous history and heritage. 11 Customer service 12 Conservation Celebrate areas in the top right Place to live 13 Sustainable practices quadrant and focus on areas in the Place to visit 14 Climate change bottom left quadrant. 35 15 Waste reduction 31 16 Waste collections 17 Animal and pest control 32 18 Natural disaster management 36 37 19 Economic development 11 20 Agricultural development 16 39 21 Tourism 38 30 25 22 Town centre development 34 29 Below 18 27 23 Goods and services 9 44 33 Above Industry 4 12 15 24 Industry 24 Education and training Average Governing 13 21 25 Families and children services 46 43 Average organisation 26 Youth services 42 8 47 28 10 6 4014 27 Seniors services 17 22 2 20 23 28 Disability access 3 26 29 Health and community services 7 30 Buildings, halls and toilets 45 41 5 31 Sport and recreation 1 19 32 Playgrounds and parks 33 Health and wellbeing 34 Safety and security FOCUS 35 Library and information on road maintenance, 36 Festivals, events, art & culture value for money from rates, 37 History & heritage 38 Aboriginal heritage and economic development. 39 Character and identity 40 Growth and development Lower 41 Planning and building Performance 42 Access to housing 43 Streetscapes 44 Street lighting Q. How would you rate performance in the following areas? Base: All respondents, excludes unsure and no response. 45 Road maintenance Service areas are included when MARKYT® Industry Standards are available. 46 Traffic management 11 Copyright CATALYSE® Pty Ltd. © 2019 47 Footpaths and cycleways Community Priorities Window TM In the Great Southern Region’s Community Priorities Window, detailed overleaf, most services are ideally located in Window B. They are receiving average ratings between okay and good. A E Perceived strengths include sport and recreation facilities, and library and information services. B F Moving forward, the community would like councils within the region to prioritise economic development, C G road maintenance and footpaths, trails and cycleways (windows F & G). D H Other areas to address include value for money from rates, community consultation, tourism attractions and marketing, streetscapes and management of parking (yellow dots). 12 Copyright CATALYSE® Pty Ltd. © 2019 1 Value for money 2 Council's leadership TM 3 Community advocacy Community Priorities Window 4 Regional partners 5 Transparency 6 Innovation 7 Community consultation 8 Informing the community 100 9 Website Excellent 10 Social media 11 Customer service 12 Conservation 13 Sustainable practices 14 Climate change 15 Waste reduction 75 35 16 Waste collections Good 31 17 Animal and pest control 32 18 Natural disaster management 37 36 19 11 Economic development 39 16 20 Agricultural development 38 25 30 34 29 21 Tourism 9 18 27 33 44 22 Town centre development 4 15 24 13 12 21 46 43 23 Goods and services 6 42 28 8 47 50 10 14 23 40 24 Education and training Okay 17 22 2 3 20 26 25 Families and children services 5 41 7 45 26 Youth services 27 Seniors services 1 19 28 Disability access 29 Health and community services 30 Buildings, halls and toilets 31 Sport and recreation 32 Playgrounds and parks 25 Poor Poor 33 Health and wellbeing Performance Index Score (out (out Index Score of 100)Performance 34 Safety and security 35 Library and information 36 Festivals, events, art & culture 37 History & heritage 38 Aboriginal heritage 39 Character and identity 40 Growth and development 0 41 Planning and building Terrible 0 5 10 15 20 25 42 Access to housing Priority (% mentions) 43 Streetscapes 44 Street lighting Q.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status Report 4
    Shire of Denmark 953 South Coast Highway (PO Box 183), Denmark WA 6333 Ph: (08) 9848 0300 Fax: (08) 9848 1985 Email: [email protected] Website: www.denmark.wa.gov.au May & June 2017 2017 International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development COUNCIL POLICY P040127 COUNCILLOR COMMUNICATION / INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION OBJECTIVE 1. To define a communication of information process for Councillors and Staff. 2. To define a reciprocal communication process between local groups / organisations, general community and Council. POLICY 1. An item “Announcement by the Person Presiding” be included on the Council meeting agenda to enable the Shire President to advise/report to Councillors matters of Civic interest. The Councillors have a period of 10 minutes to discuss matters raised by the Presiding Person. 2. The Shire President and Councillors are encouraged where relevant to provide, in writing, a list of meetings/functions attended during the month on behalf of Council. Councillors wishing to report on meetings/functions attended must do so in writing. Written reports are to be given to the Chief Executive Officer for inclusion on the next Councillors’ Information Bulletin. 3. When a Councillor as a Councillor or a Council delegate to an organisation requires a decision from Council, a request should be put to the Chief Executive Officer for an appropriate officer to prepare a written report, on behalf of the Councillor, to have it included on the Council agenda. The views of the Councillor must be expressed in the report, however the officer should reflect his or her professional opinion on the subject. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Youngs Road Feedlot Development Proposal
    Shire of Woodanilling Planning and Development Act 2005 Shire of Woodanilling Notice of public advertisement of planning proposal The local government has received an application to use and/or develop land for the following purpose and public comments are invited. Lot Nos .: 1 and 4 Street: Youngs Road Suburb: Beaufort River Proposal: - Fletcher International Export Pty Ltd (FIE) has submitted an application for a proposed Sheep Feedlot at Ronneby Park Beaufort River with a maximum capacity of 90,000 head of sheep. The sheep will be held for a minimum of 35 days before being transported to the FIE abattoir at Narrikup. The development will include approximately 130 sheep pens; a biosolid stockpile area for sheep manure and carcass management; a sedimentation pond (6,500m3) and an evaporation pond (42,548m3) for capture and holding of effluent runoff. An area for feedlot facilities/operations which will include; truck turnaround areas, grain and silage bunkers and feedlot machinery and equipment. Accommodation will be provided on site for up to 16 employees, using the existing dwellings and five transportable accommodation buildings. Water for the stock will be provided from an existing ground water bore which is proposed to be 4 litres / head / day. This gives a total extraction of 131 ML per annum. The application includes: • Site Plan and Location Plan; • Feedlot Concept Plan; • Operational Environmental Management Plan; • Water Management Plan; • Bushfire Management Plan; and • Construction Management Plan Details of the proposal are available for inspection at the local government office and can also be viewed on the Council’s website www.woodanilling.wa.gov.au Comments on the proposal may be submitted to the local government in writing on or before the 30th January 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • GSDC Bulletin 38
    ISSUE 38 Simon Baker film to boost Denmark TV star’s feature film of Tim Winton novel Funding secured through the GSDC helped to clinch a decision to produce a feature film of Tim Winton’s award-winning novel Breath in the Great Southern. Australian actor and star of The Mentalist Simon Baker visited Denmark on Friday 10 July for the announcement of the project. The production of Breath is supported by $1.5 million in State Government Royalties for Regions funding administered through the GSDC and $800,000 through ScreenWest. Mr Baker will star in and direct the film, and said he was familiar with the book. A location-scouting tour of the South West included a visit to Denmark, and Mr Baker said he and Australian producer Jamie Hilton immediately felt it was the right place to make the film. Culture and Arts Minister John Day (left), actor and director Simon Baker (centre) and Regional Development Minister Terry Redman celebrate “It was just the feel of the place and the the announcement of the Great Southern sense of community environment that rung production of the feature film Breath. out and felt special,” Mr Baker said. “We knew right there. We just looked at each “ScreenWest and the Great Southern other and we knew that we had to somehow Development Commission have worked inside this issue: try to make it work in this particular area.” closely with the film’s producers to sell the State’s attributes as a premier filming Mr Baker said he felt honoured that the destination,” Mr Day said.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Report
    APPENDICES 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 1 – Referendum, Poll and Plebiscite Results Results of referendums, polls and plebiscites are not binding, but do provide an indication of public opinion for the Council to consider when making decisions on issues. Town of Vincent A plebiscite was conducted for the Town of Vincent to decide the method of election of the mayor. Which method of filling the office of mayor do you prefer? Votes Elected by the Electors 5,632 Elected by the Council from amongst the Councillors 582 Total Valid Votes 6,214 Informal 24 Total Votes Received 6,238 The majority of electors voted to elect the office of mayor by the electors. 39 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 2 – Reasons for Rejection of Voter Packages Declaration not Declaration District Other Total signed Missing City of Albany 168 17 3 188 City of Armadale 150 33 0 183 Shire of Ashburton 15 9 0 24 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River 39 8 0 47 Town of Bassendean 82 25 3 110 City of Belmont 147 33 4 184 Shire of Bridgetown-Greenbushes 10 4 1 15 City of Bunbury 52 58 2 112 Shire of Busselton 89 27 2 118 Town of Cambridge 114 34 7 155 City of Canning 259 61 2 322 Shire of Capel 34 19 0 53 Shire of Carnarvon 26 7 4 37 Shire of Chittering 7 3 0 10 Town of Claremont 18 2 2 22 City of Cockburn 395 125 4 524 Shire of Collie 62 8 4 74 Town of Cottesloe 36 19 1 56 Shire of Cuballing 6 1 1 8 Shire of Dardanup 0 0 0 0 Shire of Denmark 36 9 1 46 Shire of Donnybrook-Balingup 32 0 0 32 Shire of East Pilbara 16
    [Show full text]
  • Wagin/Lake Grace Regional & Remote Area
    Shire of Cranbrook, hosted Regional Development Forum, and EDA Economic Development Toolkit 23 / 24 October 2012 Cranbrook Western Australia October 2012 Report from EDA Regional and Remote Areas Training Program Introduction The Shire of Cranbrook is located 300km south of Perth and 100km north of Albany Western Australia. It is predominantly an Agricultural and Viticultural based economy. For the past 7 years the Shire of Cranbrook has been a leader in economic development in the Great Southern Region being the only Shire with an economic development practitioner . The council has had a positive economic focus and shows great vision for the future of the Cranbrook Shire. A great deal has been achieved in the past few years. The Regional Development Forum and Economic Development Tool Kit event was conceived, not so much to gain information for Cranbrook, but to demonstrate what small communities are capable of achieving. This Shire and some of its surrounding neighbours were named in a desktop study by Professor Andrew Beer from Adelaide, as some of the most vulnerable in the country to climate change. The report is titled Beer, A., Tually, S., Kroehn, M. and Law, J. Australia’s Country Towns 2050: What Will a Climate Adapted Settlement Pattern Look Like? Cranbrook was named as the most vulnerable town in Western Australia. Following the release of this report some media articles appeared with headlines like “Death Knocks” and resultant cartoons. Local concerns were that this coverage would impact on the image of the area and its residents. This type of negative press may have had the ability to negate some of the development efforts being undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • SHIRE of KOJONUP Council Minutes 21
    SHIRE OF KOJONUP Council Minutes 21st April 2009 Shire of Kojonup - Council Minutes – 21st April 2009 2 SHIRE OF KOJONUP AGENDA FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD ON 21st April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DECLARATION OF OPENING AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF GUESTS 4 2 ATTENDANCE, APOLOGIES & LEAVE OF ABSENCE 4 3 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 4 4 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE 4 5 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE 4 6 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 5 7 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PRESIDING MEMBER WITHOUT DISCUSSION 5 8 PETITIONS, DEPUTATIONS & PRESENTATIONS 5 9 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 5 10 FINANCE REPORTS 5 10.1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – MONTHLY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITY 5 10.2 MONTHLY PAYMENTS LISTING 7 10.3 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – PROPOSED WRITE OFF OF SUNDRY DEBTORS 8 10.4 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – DEPRECIATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE ROAD ASSETS 10 11 ENGINEERING & WORKS REPORTS 14 12 ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT REPORTS 14 12.1 TREE PLANTATION APPLICATION PT. LOCATIONS 1, 6726, 7083, 6655, 6834, 6909, 7189 AND 7416 BOKERUP ROAD, KOJONUP 14 12.2 TREE PLANTATION APPLICATION PT. LOCATION 4861 CNR. ALBANY HIGHWAY/NEYMERRUP ROAD, SHIRE OF KOJONUP 16 12.3 TREE PLANTATION APPLICATION PT. LOCATIONS 7428 & 8880 FRANKLAND ROAD, SHIRE OF KOJONUP 18 12.4 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO. 139496 - LOT 84 CORNWALL ROAD, KOJONUP 20 12.5 FINAL APPROVAL OF TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 3 – AMENDMENT NO. 8 ‘DELEGATION CLAUSE’ 23 12.6 INITIATE TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 3 – AMENDMENT NO. 7 ‘TRANSPORT DEPOT’ FOR MATTHEWS TRANSPORT AT LOTS 1 & 3 ALBANY HIGHWAY, KOJONUP 24
    [Show full text]
  • Great Southern: a Region in Profile 2014 Foreword
    Great Southern: a region in profile 2014 Foreword Great Southern: a region in profile was prepared by the Department PG 3FHJPOBM %FWFMPQNFOU JODPOKVODUJPO XJUI UIF (SFBU 4PVUIFSO Development Commission to provide a snapshot of the region’s economy. The Great Southern economy is based on agriculture, in particular wheat, barley, canola, livestock and wool. Tourism is a growing JOEVTUSZ XJUIJO UIF SFHJPO XJUI WJTJUPST FOKPZJOH B NJY PG IJTUPSZ viticulture and a stunning natural environment. The Royalties for Regions program is an important State Government initiative that will BMMPDBUF NPSF UIBO CJMMJPOGPS SFHJPOBM QSPKFDUT JO JODMVEJOH NPSF UIBO NJMMJPO in the Great Southern region. Since it began in 2008, Royalties for Regions has allocated CJMMJPO UP NPSF UIBO QSPKFDUT BDSPTT SFHJPOBM8FTUFSO "VTUSBMJB Through programs like Royalties for Regions, the State Government is increasingly investing in JOGSBTUSVDUVSF BOE TFSWJDFT UP HSPXUIF TUBUF JODMVEJOH JNQMFNFOUJOH NBKPS FDPOPNJD TPDJBM BOE DPNNVOJUZ EFWFMPQNFOU QSPKFDUT UIBU BSJTF GSPN UIF 3FHJPOBM *OWFTUNFOU #MVFQSJOUT This publication contains the latest information available on the economic development conditions of the Great Southern region and is one of a series of nine regional economic summary documents. I invite you to read Great Southern: a region in profile and trust you will find it interesting and informative. Hon Terry RedmanRd MLA Minister for Regional Development Regional Development Commissions The State’s nine Regional Development For the purposes of achieving that role a Commissions were established by the commission is expected to: Western Australian Parliament following t QSPNPUF UIFSFHJPO the ratification of the Regional Development t GBDJMJUBUF DPPSEJOBUJPO CFUXFFO SFMFWBOU Commissions Act 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Question on Notice 2361 [Asked Wednesday 29 November 2017] – Part (A)
    Legislative Assembly Question On Notice 2361 [asked Wednesday 29 November 2017] – part (a) Shire Name / Account Name Balance 28 February 2017 Total Drawdowns Shire of Ashburton - ROYALTIES $0.00 -$18,704,321.96 Shire of Ashburton - PARABURDOO $5,041,054.23 $0.00 Shire of Augusta Margaret River - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$5,636,071.12 Shire of Augusta Margaret River - MAIN ST $5,339,085.94 -$200,000.00 Shire of Boddington - SUPERTOWNS $993,294.99 -$1,842,771.80 Shire of Boddington - REC CENTRE $1,082,766.78 -$1,500,000.00 Shire of Broome - CHINA TOWN $9,113,731.87 -$1,980,000.00 City of Bunbury - MARINE $929,184.87 -$100,000.00 City of Bunbury - KOOMBANA $10,687,969.90 -$1,950,000.00 City of Busselton - AIRPORT RED $2,469.49 -$46,033,436.14 City of Busselton - FORESHORE $1,519,677.40 -$2,698,000.00 Shire of Carnarvon -ROYALTIES $0.00 -$44,626,799.36 Shire of Carnarvon - FASCINE COMP $712,750.76 -$3,000,000.00 Shire of Collie - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$11,541,575.47 Shire of Dandaragan - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$12,857,201.13 Shire of Dandaragan - SEWAGE $0.00 -$1,072,031.77 Shire of Denmark - PRECINCT $7,014,768.63 $0.00 Shire of Derby West Kimberly - TRANSPORT $0.00 -$2,935,794.52 Shire of Donnybrook-Balingup $0.00 -$1,879,804.28 Shire of East Pilbara - ROYALTIES $0.00 -$21,316,956.82 Shire of Esperance - SUPERTOWNS $112,952.19 -$13,791,906.00 Shire of Exmouth - NINGALOO $6,762,421.87 -$15,400,000.00 Shire of Exmouth - FLOOD MITIGA $10,499.22 -$1,650,000.00 City of Greater Geraldton - BUILDING $0.00 -$5,629,313.85 City of Greater Geraldton - BERESFORD $8,938,801.47
    [Show full text]
  • Local Emergency Management Arrangements
    Local Emergency Management Arrangements SHIRE OF KATANNING SHIRE OF WOODANILLING SHIRE OF KENT These arrangements have been produced and issued under the authority of s41 (1) of the Emergency Management Act 2005, endorsed by the Shire of Katanning, Shire of Woodanilling, Shire of Kent Local Emergency Management Committee (LEMC) and has been tabled with the Great Southern District Emergency Management Committee (DEMC). …………………………………………………… ………………………… Katanning, Woodanilling, Kent LEMC Date …………………………………………………… ………………………… Endorsed by CEO Date Katanning …………………………………………………… ………………………… Endorsed by CEO Date Woodanilling …………………………………………………… ………………………… Endorsed by CEO Date Kent Page | 2 SHIRES OF KATANNING, WOODANILLING AND KENT LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PART 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 AUTHORITY 8 1.2 LEGISLATED EM FUNCTIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT 8 1.3 AIM OF THE ARRANGEMENTS 8 1.4 PURPOSE OF THE ARRANGEMENTS 8 1.5 SCOPE OF THE ARRANAGMENTS 8 1.6 AREA COVERED (CONTEXT) 9 1.6.1 SHIRE OF KATANNING 9 1.6.2 SHIRE OF WOODANILLING 9 1.6.3 THE SHIRE OF KENT 9 1.7 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 10 1.7.1 ALL SHIRES 10 1.7.2 SHIRE OF KATANNING 10 1.7.3 SHIRE OF WOODANILLING 10 1.7.4 SHIRE OF KENT 10 1.8 RELATED DOCUMENTS & ARRANGEMENTS 10 1.8.1 LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT POLICIES 11 1.8.2 LOCAL PLANS 11 1.9 AGREEMENTS, UNDERSTANDINGS & COMMITMENTS 11 1.9.1 ADDITIONAL SUPPORT 11 1.10 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 11 1.11 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY 11 2 PART 2 – PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS 12 2.1 LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (LEMC) 12 2.1.1 LEMC FUNCTIONS 12 2.1.2 LEMC MEMBERSHIP 12 2.1.3 LEMC ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 12 2.2 MEETING SCHEDULE 13 2.2.1 ANNUAL REPORTS (S.
    [Show full text]
  • GSDC Bulletin 19
    ISSUE 19 Agencies sign for mutual help Agreement to strengthen GSDC, CRCs A regional meeting of the Board of the Great Southern Development Commission (GSDC) in Borden in May was the setting for a groundbreaking agreement between the Commission and the region’s community resource centres (CRCs). Gnowangerup CRC The Great Southern CRCs, formerly known Chairperson Jill Lesk as telecentres, signed a Memorandum signs the Memorandum of of Understanding with the GSDC setting Understanding, watched by guidelines for the organisations to support CRC regional coordinator each other’s work in the region. Megan Wright and GSDC Chairman Peter Rundle. Community Resource Network Director Debbie Rice said the signing was a momentous occasion. “The memorandum also commits the “It highlights the promotion of the GSDC to refer potential clients for CRC inside this issue: partnership between the GSDC and services to the relevant centre and to the CRCs in the provision of increased consider proposals supporting training and information and services to their local learning opportunities delivered through Borden perspective ..............................2 communities,” Ms Rice said. the centres,” Mr Manning said. Jerramungup joint effort ......................2 “We value the lead set by the GSDC in “In turn, the CRCs have committed to helping instigating this agreement, which shows the GSDC with community engagement at Development Commissions review ....3 a growing connection between the a local level, providing advice on emerging organisations. issues and opportunities and being a New Board member .............................3 shopfront for GSDC information. “Royalties for Regions funding for the CRCs Regional science on stage ..................4 and for projects under the GSDC is helping “This is a mutually beneficial arrangement to build partnerships to strengthen regional for our organisations and it will work to Photo competition ................................4 communities,” Ms Rice said.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Statistics 30/09/2020 As At
    Local Government Statistics as at 30/09/2020 001 City of Albany Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Breaksea 4239 15.61% 02 Kalgan 4721 17.39% 03 Vancouver 4727 17.41% 04 West 4604 16.96% 05 Frederickstown 4435 16.34% 06 Yakamia 4421 16.29% District Total 27147 100.00% 129 City of Armadale Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Heron 6904 12.31% 02 River 7709 13.75% 03 Ranford 9016 16.08% 04 Minnawarra 7076 12.62% 05 Hills 7917 14.12% 06 Lake 9615 17.15% 07 Palomino 7842 13.98% District Total 56079 100.00% 105 Shire of Ashburton Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Ashburton 44 1.50% 03 Tom Price 1511 51.48% 04 Onslow 398 13.56% 06 Tableland 87 2.96% 07 Paraburdoo 615 20.95% 08 Pannawonica 280 9.54% District Total 2935 100.00% 002 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Augusta-Margaret River 10712 100.00% District Total 10712 100.00% 130 Town of Bassendean Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Bassendean 11119 100.00% District Total 11119 100.00% Page : 1 Local Government Statistics as at 30/09/2020 003 City of Bayswater Ward # Electors % Electors 01 North 12100 25.99% 02 Central 11858 25.47% 03 West 13381 28.74% 04 South 9217 19.80% District Total 46556 100.00% 116 City of Belmont Ward # Electors % Electors 01 West 9588 37.68% 02 South 8348 32.80% 03 East 7513 29.52% District Total 25449 100.00% 004 Shire of Beverley Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Beverley 1317 100.00% District Total 1317 100.00% 005 Shire of Boddington Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Boddington 1179 100.00% District Total 1179 100.00% 007 Shire of Boyup Brook Ward # Electors
    [Show full text]