DOCSLIB.ORG

UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/18/INF/10 28 May 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/18/INF/10 28 May 2014 CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/18/INF/10 28 May 2014 ENGLISH ONLY SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Eighteenth meeting Montreal, 23-28 June 2014 Item 3 of the provisional agenda* TECHNICAL BACKGROUND DOCUMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE MID-TERM REVIEW OF THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION Note by the Executive Secretary 1. The Executive Secretary is circulating herewith, for the information of participants in the eighteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, a technical background document to support the mid-term review of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. 2. The report was prepared by Botanic Gardens Conservation International in association with the Global Partnership for Plant Conservation and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. An earlier draft of this document was made available for peer-review and comments from six Parties and eight organizations were taken into account in preparing this document. A summary assessment based on this note is contained in a document the note by the Executive Secretary on progress in achieving the targets of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/18/3). 3. The report is presented in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. * UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/18/1. /… In order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat’s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary-General’s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. Technical background document in support of the mid-term review of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) Compiled by Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) in association with the Global Partnership for Plant Conservation (GPPC) and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Technical background document for the mid-term review of the GSPC Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................6 Section 1: Progress in national / regional implementation of the GSPC ................................................7 The GSPC and National / Regional Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans ........................................... 7 Progress in plant conservation as reported in 5th National Reports to the CBD ...................................... 8 Reviews from regional workshops ............................................................................................................ 9 Progress in China ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Progress in Brazil ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Progress in Europe .................................................................................................................................. 10 The development of national / regional plant conservation strategies ................................................. 11 South Africa ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Mexico ................................................................................................................................................. 12 A Regional Strategy for the Caucasus ................................................................................................. 13 Section 2 Progress in implementing the GSPC targets ........................................................................ 14 Target 1: An online flora of all known plants ..................................................................................... 14 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 15 The Plant List ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Developing a World Flora Online Initiative ......................................................................................... 15 e-monocot ........................................................................................................................................... 17 The Global Plants Initiative (GPI) ........................................................................................................ 17 Working towards national floras ........................................................................................................ 18 Partnership projects ............................................................................................................................ 18 Target 2: An assessment of the conservation status of all known plants as far as possible, to guide conservation action ......................................................................................................................... 21 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 22 The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ........................................................................................ 22 IUCN SSC Specialist Groups ................................................................................................................. 24 Other global initiatives ............................................................................................................................ 25 National and regional initiatives ............................................................................................................. 26 Target 3: Information, research and associated outputs and methods necessary to implement the Strategy developed and shared ........................................................................................................ 29 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 30 Global initiatives: A Toolkit for the GSPC ........................................................................................... 30 Sibbaldia Horticultural Journal ............................................................................................................ 30 Conserving Crop Wild Relatives .......................................................................................................... 30 Progress at the national level ................................................................................................................. 30 Target 4: At least 15% of each ecological region or vegetation type secured through effective management and/or restoration ...................................................................................................... 32 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 33 The Ecological Restoration Alliance of Botanic Gardens .................................................................... 33 3 Supporting national implementation ..................................................................................................... 33 Target 5: At least 75% of the most important areas for plant diversity of each ecological region protected, with effective management in place for conserving plants and their genetic diversity ....... 37 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 37 National initiatives .................................................................................................................................. 38 Target 6: At least 75% of production land in each sector managed sustainably, consistent with the conservation of plant diversity ......................................................................................................... 41 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 41 Sustainable Crop Production .............................................................................................................. 41 Sustainable forestry ............................................................................................................................ 43 Target 7: At least 75 per cent of known threatened plant species conserved in situ ........................... 43 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 44 Target 8: : At least 75 per cent of threatened plant species in ex situ collections, preferably in the country of origin, and at least 20 per cent available for recovery and restoration programmes .......... 47 Progress towards the target ................................................................................................................... 48 Global monitoring ............................................................................................................................... 48 National and regional progress ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Zamiaceae En México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Nicolalde-Morejón, Fernando; González-Astorga, Jorge; Vergara-Silva, Francisco; Stevenson, Dennis W.; Rojas-Soto, Octavio; Medina-Villarreal, Anwar Biodiversidad de Zamiaceae en México Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 114-125 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42529679048 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S114-S125, 2014 114 Nicolalde-Morejón et al.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.38114 de cícadas Biodiversidad de Zamiaceae en México Biodiversity of Zamiaceae in Mexico Fernando Nicolalde-Morejón1 , Jorge González-Astorga2, Francisco Vergara-Silva3, Dennis W. Stevenson4, Octavio Rojas-Soto5 y Anwar Medina-Villarreal2 1Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana. Av. Luis Castelazo Ayala s/n, Col. Industrial Ánimas, 91190 Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 2Laboratorio de Genética de Poblaciones, Red de Biología Evolutiva. Instituto de Ecología, A. C. Km 2.5 Antigua Carretera a Coatepec Núm. 351, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 3Laboratorio de Sistemática Molecular (Jardín Botánico), Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 3er Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510 México, D. F. México. 4The New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, Nueva York, 10458-5120, USA. 5Red de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, A. C. Km 2.5 Antigua Carretera a Coatepec Núm.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Species Selected from the Analysis of 2004 EC Annual Report
    Review of species selected from the Analysis of 2005 EC Annual Report to CITES (Version edited for public release) Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Development and Environment by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre May, 2008 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK ABOUT UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world‘s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision- makers recognize the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre‘s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactaceae) Ve Výuce Biologie Na Středních Školách
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PŘÍRODOVĚDĚCKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA BOTANIKY Čeleď kaktusovité (Cactaceae) ve výuce biologie na středních školách DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE Bc. Adéla Gorová Biologie N1501, Biologie – Geografie Prezenční studium Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Martina Oulehlová, Ph.D. Olomouc 2020 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že předložená práce je mým původním autorským dílem, které jsem vypracovala samostatně. Veškerou literaturu a další zdroje, z nichž jsem při zpracování čerpala, v práci řádně cituji a jsou uvedeny v seznamu použité literatury. V Olomouci dne . Adéla Gorová Poděkování Mé poděkování patří vedoucí bakalářské práce Mgr. Martině Oulehlové, Ph. D. za odborné vedení, ochotu a čas, který mi v průběhu vypracovávání diplomové práce věnovala. Dále poděkování patří Ing. Heleně Šupové, Ing. Zdeňku Šupovi a Ing. Pavlu Součkovi za poskytnutí materiálů a umožnění vstupu do Kaktusového skleníku Výstaviště Flora Olomouc, a.s., a také Nikol Kaletové za odbornou korekci abstraktu přeloženého do angličtiny. Poděkování patří také projektům IGA-Prf- 2018-001 a IGA-Prf-2019-004. BIBLIOGRAFICKÁ IDENTIFIKACE Jméno a příjmení: Bc. Adéla Gorová Název práce: Čeleď kaktusovité (Cactaceae) ve výuce biologie na středních školách Typ práce: Diplomová práce Pracoviště: Katedra botaniky, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Martina Oulehlová, Ph.D. Rok obhajoby: 2020 Abstrakt: Diplomová práce se zabývá problematikou výuky čeledi kaktusovitých (Cactaceae) na středních školách. Teoretická část práce je zaměřena na praktický význam, využití, zajímavosti a specifika čeledi Cactaceae. Dále na charakteristiku Kaktusového skleníku Výstaviště Flora Olomouc, a.s., rozmístění zástupců kaktusů ve skleníku a charakteristiku pěstovaných zástupců kaktusů. Praktická část je zaměřena na tvorbu přehledného systému čeledi Cactaceae pro výuku studentů na středních školách, na přípravu přehledu pěstovaných zástupců kaktusů a na vytvoření komplexní přípravy pro realizaci exkurze pedagoga se studenty do sbírkového Kaktusového skleníku Výstaviště Flora Olomouc, a.s.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF File
    ISSN 2473-442X CONTENTS Message from Dr. Patrick Griffith, Co-chair, IUCN/SSC CSG 3 Official newsletter of IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group Botanic Garden: In Focus Vol. IV I Issue 2 I December 2019 Montgomery Botanical Center’s Cycad Collection – Focus on research and conservation 5 Michael Calonje & Patrick Griffith Feature Articles Towards an approach for the conservation and illegal trade prevention of South Africa’s endangered Encephalartos spp. 10 James A. R. Clugston, Michelle Van Der Bankand Ronny M. Kobongo Fire is the most important threat for conservation of Dioon merolae (espadaña) in the hill Nambiyigua, municipality of Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico 13 Miguel Angel Pérez-Farrera & Mauricio Martínez Martínez Ex-situ Cycad Conservation [1]: Public and Private Collections 16 Chip Jones & JS Khuraijam The Cycad Specialist Group (CSG) is a component of the IUCN Species Research and Conservation News Survival Commission (IUCN/SSC). It consists of a group of volunteer The Cycad Extinction Crisis in South Africa 19 experts addressing conservation Wynand van Eeden & Tim Gregory issues related to cycads, a highly What is Ceratozamia becerrae ? 21 threatened group of land plants. The Andrew P. Vovides, Miguel Angel Pérez-Farrera & José Said Gutiérrez-Ortega CSG exists to bring together the world’s cycad conservation expertise, Preliminary Finding: Seed longevity of Encephalartos in controlled storage 23 and to disseminate this expertise to Ngawethu Ngaka and Phakamani Xaba organizations and agencies which can use this guidance to advance cycad Meeting Reports conservation. 2nd Nong Nooch Cycad Horticulture Workshop 25 Official website of CSG: Anders Lindstrom http://www.cycadgroup.org/ Plant Conservation Genetics Workshop 26 Co-Chairs Caroline Iacuaniello, Stephanie Steele & Christy Powell John Donaldson Patrick Griffith CSG Members 28 Vice Chairs Michael Calonje Cristina Lopez-Gallego Red List Authority Coordinator De Wet Bosenberg CSG Newsletter Committee JS Khuraijam, Editor Irene Terry Andrew P.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Profiling of Primary Metabolites and Galantamine
    plants Article Metabolic Profiling of Primary Metabolites and Galantamine Biosynthesis in Wounded Lycoris radiata Callus 1, 1, 2, 3 Chang Ha Park y, Ramaraj Sathasivam y , Bao Van Nguyen y, Seung-A Baek , Hyeon Ji Yeo 1, Ye Eun Park 1, Haeng Hoon Kim 4 , Jae Kwang Kim 3,* and Sang Un Park 1,2,* 1 Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Korea; [email protected] (C.H.P.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (H.J.Y.); [email protected] (Y.E.P.) 2 Department of Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Korea; [email protected] 3 Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Yeonsugu, Incheon 22012, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Well-being Resources, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.K.K.); [email protected] (S.U.P.); Tel.: +82-32-835-8241 (J.K.K.); +82-42-821-5730 (S.U.P.); Fax: +82-32-835-0763 (J.K.K.); +82-42-822-2631 (S.U.P.) Chang Ha Park, Ramaraj Sathasivam, and Bao Van Nguyen contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 October 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 20 November 2020 Abstract: Plants are continuously exposed to abiotic and biotic factors that lead to wounding stress. Different plants exhibit diverse defense mechanisms through which various important metabolites are synthesized. Humans can exploit these mechanisms to improve the efficacy of existing drugs and to develop new ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Sotwp 2016.Pdf
    STATE OF THE WORLD’S PLANTS OF THE WORLD’S STATE 2016 The staff and trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and the Kew Foundation would like to thank the Sfumato Foundation for generously funding the State of the World’s Plants project. State of the World’s Plants 2016 Citation This report should be cited as: RBG Kew (2016). The State of the World’s Plants Report – 2016. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew ISBN: 978-1-84246-628-5 © The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2016) (unless otherwise stated) Printed on 100% recycled paper The State of the World’s Plants 1 Contents Introduction to the State of the World’s Plants Describing the world’s plants 4 Naming and counting the world’s plants 10 New plant species discovered in 2015 14 Plant evolutionary relationships and plant genomes 18 Useful plants 24 Important plant areas 28 Country focus: status of knowledge of Brazilian plants Global threats to plants 34 Climate change 40 Global land-cover change 46 Invasive species 52 Plant diseases – state of research 58 Extinction risk and threats to plants Policies and international trade 64 CITES and the prevention of illegal trade 70 The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing 76 References 80 Contributors and acknowledgments 2 Introduction to the State of the World’s Plants Introduction to the State of the World’s Plants This is the first document to collate current knowledge on as well as policies and international agreements that are the state of the world’s plants.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Stevensonii Has Closer Phylogenetic Affinities with Carretera a Coatepec No
    Systematics and Biodiversity 7 (1): 73–79 Issued 22 February 2009 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002879 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum Fernando Nicolalde-Morejon´ 1, Reciprocal illumination of morphological Francisco Vergara-Silva2,∗, Jorge Gonzalez-Astorga´ 3, characters upon a molecular hypothesis Andrew P. Vovides1 & Alejandro Espinosa de los Monteros4 supports the proposal of a new species of 1Laboratorio de Biolog´ıa Evolutiva de Cycadales, cycad from Mexico Departamento de Biolog´ıa Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecolog´ıa, A.C., km 2.5 Antigua Carretera a Coatepec No. 351, Xalapa Abstract The new species Dioon stevensonii, from the Rio Balsas basin spanning 91070, Veracruz, Mexico 2Laboratorio de Sistem´atica the states of Michoacan´ and Guerrero, Mexico, is described and illustrated. The de- Molecular, Instituto de Biolog´ıa scription of this species implies a recircumscription of the populations of Dioon that (Jard´ın Bot´anico), Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico, constitutethepreviouslycharacterisedD.tomasellii,whichalsoincludespopulations 3er Circuito Exterior Ciudad located in Durango, Nayarit and Jalisco. Dioon stevensonii differs from its congeners Universitaria, Coyoac´an04510, in characters of both vegetative and reproductive structures – namely, leaflet con- M´exico, D.F., Mexico 3Laboratorio de Gen´etica de tour shape, leaflet curvature and reflection of the megasporophyll tips. Despite its Poblaciones, Departamento de morphological affinities with D. tomasellii, complementary cladistic analyses of mo- Biolog´ıaEvolutiva, Instituto de Ecolog´ıa, A.C., km 2.5 Antigua lecular matrices indicate that D. stevensonii has closer phylogenetic affinities with Carretera a Coatepec No. 351, the D. edule and D. spinulosum species groups, which are distributed along the Gulf Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico of Mexico and Caribbean seaboards.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactaceae) with Special Emphasis on the Genus Mammillaria Charles A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria Charles A. Butterworth Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Butterworth, Charles A., "Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 565. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/565 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER CONSERVATION GROUP Issue 2011/4, December 2011
    INTERNATIONAL MIRE NEWSLETTER CONSERVATION GROUP issue 2011/4, December 2011 The International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG) is an international network of specialists having a particular interest in mire and peatland conservation. The network encompasses a wide spectrum of expertise and interests, from research scientists to consultants, government agency specialists to peatland site managers. It operates largely through e-mail and newsletters, and holds regular workshops and symposia. For more information: consult the IMCG Website: http://www.imcg.net IMCG has a Main Board of currently 15 people from various parts of the world that has to take decisions between congresses. Of these 15 an elected 5 constitute the IMCG Executive Committee that handles day-to-day affairs. The Executive Committee consists of a Chairman (Piet-Louis Grundling), a Secretary General (Hans Joosten), a Treasurer (Francis Müller), and 2 additional members (Ab Grootjans, Rodolfo Iturraspe). Fred Ellery, Seppo Eurola, Lebrecht Jeschke, Richard Lindsay, Viktor Masing (†), Rauno Ruuhijärvi, Hugo Sjörs (†), Michael Steiner, Michael Succow and Tatiana Yurkovskaya have been awarded honorary membership of IMCG. Editorial This Newsletter is entirely dedicated to the 16th international IMCG Field Symposium, which took place in Slovakia and Poland 4-18 July, 2010. This special issue of the IMCG newsletter is also the pre-publication of a free electronic book that will be published soon. The title of the e-book is “Groundwater fed mires in Slovakia and Poland: a guide to the IMCG 2010 field symposium.” It was edited by Ab Grootjans and Ema Gojdičová. The design and layout was done by Viktória Ihringová, (State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Background Document in Support of the Mid-Term Review of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC)
    Technical background document for the mid-term review of the GSPC Technical background document in support of the mid-term review of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) Compiled by Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) in association with the Global Partnership for Plant Conservation (GPPC) and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 1 Technical background document for the mid-term review of the GSPC Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................5 Section 1: Progress in national / regional implementation of the GSPC ................................................6 The GSPC and National / Regional Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans ........................................... 6 Progress in plant conservation as reported in 5th National Reports to the CBD ...................................... 7 Reviews from regional workshops ............................................................................................................ 8 Progress in China ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Progress in Brazil ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Progress in Europe .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kent-Botany-2019.Pdf
    0 1 Kent Botany 2019 Contents Page Introduction 1 Corrections to Kent Botany 2018 8 Plant records: selection criteria and recorders 8 Plant records for East Kent (vice county 15) 10 Plant records for West Kent (vice county 16) 27 References 35 Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener (January 2020, web version 1) Front cover: Raphanus raphanistrum subsp. maritimus R (Sea Radish) at Minster (Sheppey). Photo 4 July 2019, © Lliam Rooney Introduction Kent Botany 2019 is the tenth report in the Kent Botany series, reporting on current botanical developments in the county. It represents a significant milestone, as 2019 brings to an end ten seasons of recording by the Kent Botanical Recording Group, founded in March 2010. It is also the end of the Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland’s (BSBI) date class 2010-19, a ten-year period for the assemblage of records which may be compared with previous ten-year date classes, to identify trends in the distribution of our flora. In addition, it is the end of the BSBI’s Atlas 2020 project, which seeks to map the current status of the British and Irish flora, following up the last mapping (Preston et al., 2002), twenty years before. This report is issued primarily as a web version, maintained on the Kent page of the BSBI website, https://bsbi.org/kent, and this should be regarded as the definitive version. The text, substantially the same, is also published as hard copy within the Kent Field Club (KFC) Bulletin. Highlights Highlights for 2019 included the following: Juncus ranarius (Frog Rush) has been restored to the Kent flora, with the discovery of a population at Crossness; Juncus x surrejanus (J.
    [Show full text]