DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulgaria's EU Membership: the Adaptation to the New Status Is Not

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Venelin Tsachevsky Bulgaria’s EU membership: the adaptation to the new status is not over Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 16/2010 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Bulgaria’s EU membership: the adaptation to the new status is not over Venelin Tsachevsky1 16/2010 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute www.tse.fi/pei Opinions and views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Pan-European Institute or its staff members. 1 Venelin Tsachevsky was born in 1948 in Sofia. He holds a master’s degree on World economy from the University for National and World Economy in Sofia. In 1975 he got a Ph.D. degree on international economic relations and in 1989 a second Ph.D. on international relations. He was counsellor at the European Integration Directorate in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As professor of political studies he delivered lectures on the theory of foreign relations and Bulgarian foreign policy in several universities. In 2007 - 2009 he was a guest professor at Helsinki University on South Eastern and Bulgaria’s development and foreign policy. Venelin Tsachevsky is author of around 300 publications about the development and foreign policy of Bulgaria, the regional cooperation and integration of the Balkan countries to the European Union and NATO. In 2003 - 2006 he was Ambassador of Bulgaria to Finland and was decorated with the order “Guard Cross” for his contribution to the development of the Bulgarian-Finnish relations. Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 16/2010 www.tse.fi/pei Contents 1 CHRONOLOGY OF BULGARIA’S ROAD TO THE EU MEMBERSHIP 2 2 TERMS OF BULGARIA’S EU MEMBERSHIP 4 3 THE NEW STATUS OF BULGARIA SINCE THE BEGINNING OF 2007 11 4 THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF BULGARIA’S EU MEMBERSHIP – POLITICAL DIMENSIONS 16 5 THE EU AS AN ECONOMIC PARTNER OF BULGARIA 21 6 THE MECHANISM FOR COOPERATION AND VERIFICATION FOR BULGARIA 25 7 CONCLUSION 35 MAIN EVENTS IN BULGARIA’S EU INTEGRATION 40 REFERENCES 45 1 Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 16/2010 www.tse.fi/pei 1 CHRONOLOGY OF BULGARIA’S ROAD TO THE EU MEMBERSHIP In the early 1990s the accession to the EU became a priority aim of the Bulgarian foreign policy. The achievement of this aim started along with the declared readiness of the EU to continue its enlargement towards Central and Eastern Europe. There was a common desire of all European countries to put an end to the division in the continent following the Second World War and to create united, peaceful and prosperous Europe based on democratic values, solidarity and cooperation. At that time the EU enlargement to the East could not happen immediately since the East European countries needed to meet the criteria for membership. That process was conditioned by the development of individual relations on the part of the EU with each European country within the framework of a common approach to the integration policy. The first stage was the signing of Europe Agreements in the 1990s followed by the accession negotiations that started at the beginning of the first decade of the new century. It was the fifth EU enlargement. Bulgaria was among the ten former socialist countries in Central and Eastern Europe that took part in this process. Here are the main events in the evolution of the relations between Bulgaria and the EU. The country established diplomatic relations and the European Economic Community (EEC) on August 8, 1988. Two years later (May 8, 1990) Bulgaria and the EEC signed the Convention on Trade, Business and Economic Relations. It envisaged gradual elimination of the quantitative limitations on Bulgarian import to the Community, and making mutual concessions in the field of trade in agricultural goods. The PHARE Programme was opened for the country. On March 8, 1993 Bulgaria and the EU signed the Europe Agreement and the Provisional Agreement on Trade and Related Matters. The Europe Agreement provided a framework for development of a profound political dialogue and for establishment of a free trade zone covering the trade between Bulgaria and the EU. The EU expressed its political commitment to support Bulgaria’s democratic and market economy reforms necessary for its fulfilling the criteria for EU membership. The Europe Agreement came into force nearly two years later - on February 1, 1995. Bulgaria became the eighth East European country to submit its application for EU membership on December 15, 1995. 2 Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 16/2010 www.tse.fi/pei In 1998 the European Commission (EC) started to draw up annual reports which included its assessment of Bulgaria’s progress on political, legislative, economic and other reforms. Up to the country’s accession to the EU in early 2007, the EC published ten annual reports in total on the progress achieved by Bulgaria in meeting the criteria for membership. On December 10, 1999 in Helsinki the European Council decided to start EU accession negotiations with Bulgaria included in a group of six East European countries (along with Romania, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia and Malta). The negotiations for EU membership with Bulgaria were launched on February 15, 2000. In the EC regular report published on October 9, 2002 Bulgaria was recognized as a "functioning market economy". The EC expressed its support to Bulgaria’s accession to the EU in 2007. On a technical level the negotiations were concluded on June 15, 2004 but the political decision to declare the negotiation process as complete was made by the European Council on December 17, 2004. The last Monitoring Report of the EC (issued on September 26, 2006) on the progress achieved by Bulgaria in meeting the criteria for membership was crucial for determining the date of the country’s accession to the EU. The signing of the Treaty of Accession (together with Romania) took place on April 25, 2005 in Luxembourg. Bulgaria ratified the Treaty on May 11 the same year, while the ratification process by all EU Member States was completed on December 20, 2006. The Accession Treaty entered into force on January 1, 2007 when Bulgaria and Romania became the 26th and 27th member states of the EU. This was the final point of the fifth EU enlargement. 3 Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 16/2010 www.tse.fi/pei 2 TERMS OF BULGARIA’S EU MEMBERSHIP The preparedness of Bulgaria at the start of the negotiations for EU membership was less compared with that of the majority of the other countries in Central and Eastern Europe that were included in the fifth EU enlargement. That was one of the reasons for Bulgaria’s lagging behind these countries, with the exception of Romania, in the pace of the accession negotiations. It resulted in the later date for its joining the EU. Throughout the accession talks the EU exerted a constant pressure on Bulgaria in order to accelerate the implementation of the necessary reforms and to meet the membership criteria. This pressure continued even after the country’s accession to the EU. In December 2006 the EC decided to set up a special monitoring of Bulgaria up to three years after the country has joined the EU. The monitoring covered six areas of concern - the judiciary, the fight against corruption and organized crime, the use of financial aid provided by the EU, food and air safety. Bulgaria committed itself to fulfilling the so called "accompanying measures" under the supervision of a “cooperation and verification mechanism”. Since June 2007 the EC has been publishing annual reports on the progress in these areas. In the event of any shortcoming or insufficient progress in implementing the accompanying measures, the EC could impose various sanctions, including a cut to EU funds provided to Bulgaria. The most stringent measures were the eventual introduction of „safeguard clauses” that could limit some Bulgaria’s rights as an EU member state. The monitoring period expired in early 2010 but due to the unsatisfactory progress achieved by Bulgaria, the EC decided to continue its supervision over the areas of concern for at least another year. During the accession negotiations the most difficult issue was to reach mutual consent on the energy chapter that was temporary closed in November 2002. The main concern was the EU insistence that Bulgaria shut down Units 1-4 of the nuclear power plant (NPP) in Kozloduy. The argument was that these units were using Russian-made old generation nuclear reactors considered to be dangerous in their exploitation. The EU did not change its position, although, according to the reviews by recognised international institutions, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, the technical safety of the Bulgarian NPP in Kozloduy was in compliance with the international safety standards. 4 Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 16/2010 www.tse.fi/pei Finally, a mutual agreement was reached, according to which the first and second reactors were to be shut down in late 2002. The third and fourth energy units were decommissioned four years later on the eve of Bulgaria's EU accession. Bulgaria was promised financial compensations. By early 2007 their value was about 450 million euro. Under Article 30 of the Accession Treaty, EU has committed itself to providing an additional 210 million euro in 2007 – 2009. This assistance was insufficient to fully compensate Bulgaria’s financial losses from the premature closure of the part of its only nuclear power plant that at that time generated about 45% of the national electricity. By various estimates, the total direct and indirect losses for Bulgaria resulting from the decommissioning of the four nuclear power units amounted to 2 - 5 billions euro. The closure, especially of the third and fourth energy units of the NPP in Kozloduy aggravated the national energy balance.
Recommended publications
  • KAS MP SOE Redebeitrag AM En

    KAS MP SOE Redebeitrag AM En

    REPORT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung MEDIA MONITORING LABORATORY February 2015 Media under their own momentum: www.fmd.bg The deficient will to change www.kas.de Foundation Media Democracy (FMD) and KAS. In summary, the main findings, by the Media Program South East Europe of areas of monitoring, include: the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) present the joint annual report on the MEDIA DISCOURSE state of the Bulgarian media environment in 2014. The study summarises the trends Among the most striking images in the coverage of socio-political constructed by Bulgarian media in 2014 was developments in the country. During the the presentation of patriotism as the monitored period dynamic processes sanctuary of identity. Among the most unfolded – European Parliament elections watched television events during the year and early elections to the National turned to be the Klitschko-Pulev boxing Assembly took place, three governments match. The event inflamed social networks, changed in the country’s governance. morning shows, commentary journalism. It was presented not simply as boxing, but as The unstable political situation has also an occasion for national euphoria. Such affected the media environment, in which a discourse fitted into the more general trend number of important problems have failed of nourishing patriotic passions which to find a solution. During the year, self- through the stadium language, but also regulation was virtually blocked. A vast through the media language, are easily majority of the media continued operating mobilised into street and political forms of at a loss. For many of them the problem symbolic and physical violence against with the ownership clarification remained others (Roma, refugees, the sexually and unresolved.
  • An Unsupervised Language Independent Method of Name Discrimination Using Second Order Co-Occurrence Features

    An Unsupervised Language Independent Method of Name Discrimination Using Second Order Co-Occurrence Features

    An Unsupervised Language Independent Method of Name Discrimination Using Second Order Co-Occurrence Features Ted Pedersen1, Anagha Kulkarni1, Roxana Angheluta2, Zornitsa Kozareva3, and Thamar Solorio4 1 University of Minnesota, Duluth, USA 2 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3 University of Alicante, Spain 4 University of Texas at El Paso, USA Abstract. Previous work by Pedersen, Purandare and Kulkarni (2005) has resulted in an unsupervised method of name discrimination that represents the context in which an ambiguous name occurs using second order co–occurrence features. These contexts are then clustered in order to identify which are associated with different underlying named entities. It also extracts descriptive and discriminating bigrams from each of the discovered clusters in order to serve as identifying labels. These methods have been shown to perform well with English text, although we believe them to be language independent since they rely on lexical features and use no syntactic features or external knowledge sources. In this paper we apply this methodology in exactly the same way to Bulgarian, English, Romanian, and Spanish corpora. We find that it attains discrimination accuracy that is consistently well above that of a majority classifier, thus providing support for the hypothesis that the method is language independent. 1 Introduction Purandare and Pedersen (e.g., [9], [10]) previously developed an unsupervised method of word sense discrimination that has also been applied to name discrim- ination by Pedersen, Purandare, and Kulkarni [8]. This method is characterized by a reliance on lexical features, and avoids the use of syntactic or other language dependent information. This is by design, since the method is intended to port easily and effectively to a range of languages.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • A Game of Polls: Bulgaria's Presidential Election Threatens To

    A Game of Polls: Bulgaria's Presidential Election Threatens To

    A game of polls: Bulgaria’s presidential election threatens to shake up the country’s party system blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/10/31/game-of-polls-bulgaria-presidential-election/ 31/10/2016 Bulgaria will hold presidential elections on 6 November, with a second round runoff scheduled for 13 November. Dimitar Bechev previews the contest, writing that the candidate supported by the country’s largest party, GERB, could face a tougher contest than originally anticipated. Presidential elections in Bulgaria are supposed to be a rather dull affair. Many expected the candidate handpicked by Prime Minister Boyko Borisov to make it comfortably to the second round (to be held on 13 November), piggybacking on their patron’s popularity as well as the ruling party GERB’s (Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria) formidable electoral machine. To Borisov’s chagrin, that now seems less and less likely. Polls suggest that the race between his choice, parliament speaker Tsetska Tsacheva, and General Rumen Radev, backed by the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP), will be tight. Not quite the suspense of the U.S. presidential contest, but certainly not lacking in drama either. And, to boot, the opposition frontrunner might actually have a fair chance. He could well rally the votes cast for United Patriots, an ultra-nationalist coalition between erstwhile sworn enemies the Patriotic Front and Ataka, for ABV (Alternative for Bulgarian Renaissance), a splinter group from the BSP, and several other minor players. Borisov has only himself to blame for this state of affairs. He delayed his choice as much as possible, unveiling Tsacheva at the very last moment – well after other contenders had stepped into the fray.
  • The European Parliament Elections in Bulgaria Are Likely to Reinforce the Country's Political Stalemate Between Left and Right

    The European Parliament Elections in Bulgaria Are Likely to Reinforce the Country's Political Stalemate Between Left and Right

    The European Parliament elections in Bulgaria are likely to reinforce the country’s political stalemate between left and right blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/04/14/the-european-parliament-elections-in-bulgaria-are-likely-to-reinforce- the-countrys-political-stalemate-between-left-and-right/ 14/04/2014 The Bulgarian government currently lacks a majority in the country’s national parliament, with the governing coalition counting on support from 120 out of 240 MPs. Kyril Drezov writes that the upcoming European elections will likely be fought on the basis of this domestic situation, with European issues playing only a minor role, and the majority of seats being distributed between the two largest parties: the Bulgarian Socialist Party and the Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB). European Parliament Elections are still fairly new for Bulgaria – the 2014 elections will be only the third since accession. Like previous EP elections in 2007 and 2009, their function is purely as a test for changes in national politics. The present election campaign is overwhelmingly dominated by domestic concerns and is notable for the absence of EU-related issues. As a leftover from the accession days, the European Union is still considered ‘a good thing’ in Bulgaria and does not generate much passion. There is consensus amongst Bulgarians that key European policies are shaped somewhere else, and that Sofia’s role is to adapt to these policies whatever shape they may take. The big traditional players in Bulgarian politics gravitate towards particular European party families – Socialist, Christian Democratic and Liberal – and in their election manifestoes mostly parrot whatever line these party families take on the big European issues.
  • Zornitsa Markova the KTB STATE

    Zornitsa Markova the KTB STATE

    Zornitsa Markova THE KTB STATE Sofia, 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or express written consent from Iztok-Zapad Publishing House. transmitted in any form or by any means without first obtaining © Zornitsa Markova, 2017 © Iztok-Zapad Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-619-01-0094-2 zornitsa markova THE KTB STATE CHRONICLE OF THE LARGEST BANK FAILURE IN BULGARIA — THE WORKINGS OF A CAPTURED STATE THAT SOLD OUT THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR PRIVATE EXPEDIENCY CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS / 12 EDITOR’S FOREWORD / 13 SUMMARY / 15 READER’S GUIDE TO THE INVESTIGATION / 21 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND / 23 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BULGARIAN BANKING SECTOR THAT PRE-DATE KTB ..........................................................25 Headed for a Banking Crisis .................................................................................................. 26 Scores of Banks Close Their Doors................................................................................... 29 First Private Bank — Backed by the Powerful, Favoured by the Government ......................................................... 33 Criminal Syndicates and Their Banks — the Birth of a State within the State ...........................................................................35 A Post-Crisis Change of Players ..........................................................................................37 A FRESH START FOR THE FLEDGLING KTB ..................................................... 40 KTB SALE ..........................................................................................................................................42
  • By Stanimir Vaglenov

    By Stanimir Vaglenov

    By Stanimir Vaglenov “Will I have heat in my home, or will my family freeze this winter?” It seems funny to think about such an issue during the summer months, especially because I have dutifully paid my bills to Toplofikazia-Sofia, the company that delivers heat to the Bulgarian capital. During the past year, however, corruption scandals have rocked the energy company, which is owned by the Ministry of Economy and Energy and the Municipality of Sofia. The scandals began unraveling on July 5, 2006, when Toplofikazia-Sofia Executive Director Valentin Dimitrov was arrested on corruption charges. The previous day, a tax inspector, Alexander Angelov, was arrested in a cafe while carrying 135,000 levs (US$88,345) in bribe money. He faced charges that he requested a bribe of 1.5 million levs (US$1 million) from Sofia businessman Valentin Zahariev, former CEO of the Kremikovtsi steel factory, in exchange for a delay in the tax payments owed by the company. The inquiry into his case lasted only 14 days, after which, in January, the Sofia Municipality Court sentenced Angelov to two and a half years in prison. Dimitrov’s trial, however, is still ongoing. The energy company executive was arrested and charged with tax evasion and embezzlement after prosecutors found several bank accounts and deposit boxes containing 12 million levs (US$8.5 million) in Bulgaria and Austria. Meanwhile, the company he led teetered on the brink of bankruptcy. After serving 10 months and 17 days in custody, Dimitrov was set free by the Sofia City Court for a 20,000-lev (US$14,180) bail.
  • By Alexenia Dimitrova at 6:28 Am on July 3, 2008, Ivan

    By Alexenia Dimitrova at 6:28 Am on July 3, 2008, Ivan

    By Alexenia Dimitrova At 6:28 a.m. on July 3, 2008, Ivan N., a Bulgarian small- business owner, was shaving. Suddenly, a loud crash came from the kitchen. In the distance, a powerful bomb had exploded. The detonation was so intense that it shattered Ivan’s kitchen window. Ivan’s frightened wife asked him: “What happened?” Thousands of pieces of broken glass lay on the balcony. Thick black smoke spread in the distance. Minutes later, more explosions were heard. “I am fed up,” Ivan recalls angrily thinking. “Who has not completed their work this time? What sort of country do we live in? We joined the European Union, but it seems we still live in the past.” In the recent months, not one week had passed without a scandal. A television newscast later explained that the likely cause of the explosions was misconduct in a military warehouse where old munitions were kept. “It was more or less the result of an improper job. The officials only think of what benefit could come from the power,” Ivan said, noting he was reminded of other recent scandals. Corruption in High Places On Feb. 1, 2008, Veselin Georgiev, the Director of the State Fund for Republican Road Infrastructure (Darzhaven Fond za Republikanska Patna Infrastructura — DFRPI) resigned. His resignation was most likely due to the public revelation in January that the company Binder, managed by Georgiev’s brother, had allegedly received work orders from DFRPI for 120 million leva (US$90.5 million). In fact, Georgiev was the manager of Binder until two years ago.
  • HUMAN RIGHTS in BULGARIA in 2013 the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Is an Independent Non-Governmental Organisation for the Protection of Human Rights

    HUMAN RIGHTS in BULGARIA in 2013 the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Is an Independent Non-Governmental Organisation for the Protection of Human Rights

    HUMAN RIGHTS IN BULGARIA IN 2013 The Bulgarian Helsinki Committee is an independent non-governmental organisation for the protection of human rights. It was established on 14 July 1992. Chair: Krassimir Kanev Deputy chair: Desislava Simeonova Members of the General Assembly: Antoaneta Nenkova, Daniela Furtunova, Desislava Simeonova, Dimitrina Petrova, Georgi Bankov, Georgi Toshev, Iliana Savova, Ivan Bedrov, Kalina Bozeva, Kiril Ivanov, Krassimir Kanev, Margarita Ilieva, Ramadan Kehajov, Vassil Chaprazov, Valko Stanev, Yana Buhrer Tavanier. Contents Political developments in Bulgaria during 2013 5 Right to life, protection from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 7 Right to liberty and security of person 12 Independence of the judiciary and fair trial 16 Right to respect for private and family life, home and the correspondence 21 Freedom of conscience and religion 23 Freedom of expression and access to information 26 Conditions in places of detention 33 Protection against discrimination 42 Right to asylum, freedom of movement 53 Women’s rights 60 Rights of the child 64 LGBTI rights 69 List of abbreviations AEJ Association of European Journalists – Bulgaria AIP Access to Information Programme BHC Bulgarian Helsinki Committee BNT Bulgarian National Television BSP Bulgarian Socialist Party CBS Correctional boarding schools CEM Council for Electronic Media CPA Child Protection Act ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights ESDRA Enforcement of Sentences and Detention under Remand Act FRA EU Fundamental
  • Issue 12, Express Special Edition – the Government Resigns February 2013

    Issue 12, Express Special Edition – the Government Resigns February 2013

    Issue 12, Express Special Edition – The Government Resigns February 2013 20 Feb 2013, 11:00 a.m. EXPAT CURRENCY BOARD WATCH EDITORIAL COMMENT 0º This is an ‘express special issue’ of Expat Compass Average We were just preparing a ‘normal’ regular issue when the political landscape in Bulgaria changed significantly within a few days -45º Bad II.13 Good +45º The mass protests were initially directed at the high I.13 electricity bills in December, but are now turning into general protests against the government The finance minister Dyankov was forced to resign -90 º Dangerous Excellent +90º on Monday, which was followed by the fall of the OUTLOOK: NEGATIVE whole cabinet It is too early to say what government will follow and We are not worried about the currency board and when see no immediate danger of devaluation. However, due to the latest political events, we are increasingly In January, the financial outlook was positive worried about the lack of government and hence Before the latest events, we were planning to about the budget in a difficult election year. improve the reading of the Compass from +5˚ to +15˚, as well as improve the Outlook from Stable to Positive. The main reasons were: The 2012 budget was better-than-expected, with BREAKING NEWS a deficit of BGN350.2m, -0.45% of GDP. This is the 3rd lowest deficit in the EU (see p. 7) The old Eurobonds were repaid successfully in Today, 20 Feb 2013, Boyko Borisov’s government has January, as expected resigned The new Eurobonds were trading at a yield as Technically, despite Simenon Dyankov’s resignation low as 1.75% – in line with the rally in global from Monday, he will continue being Finance Minister bond markets.
  • Bulgaria 1 the European Times Bulgaria

    Bulgaria 1 the European Times Bulgaria

    THE EUROPEAN TIMES EUROPEAN THE BULGARIA 1 BULGARIA INTRODUCTION AGRICULTURE • Most Favourable Tax Treatment • Agriculture Sector Offers in the European Union 4 Significant Investment Potential 18 GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT • Strong Government Focused • Ambitious Upgrades of the on Growth and Stability 6 Transport System 20 ECONOMY ENERGY • Buoyant Economic Growth Driven • Interview with Temenuzhka Petkova, by Consumption and Investment 8 Minister of Energy: Bulgaria’s Reliable Energy Sector is a Strong Base BUSSINESS & INVESTMENT for Economic Growth 22 OPPORTUNITIES • Strategic Logistics Hub and HEALTHCARE Superb Investment Destination 10 • Modernisation of the Healthcare • PREDISTIC LTD: Vibrant Company System Underway 24 Strives to Become the Preferred IT Partner for Leading International Businesses 13 • PDS Bulgaria: Cutting Edge Software TOURISM and Consultancy for the Digitally Transforming Businesses 13 • Interview with Blagoi Ragin, • Invest Bulgaria Agency: President of BHRA: Significant Bulgaria – Come for a Visit, Contribution to the Bulgarian Return on Investment 14 Toursim Sector 26 • Industrial Zones with Attractive • Among Europe’s Fastest Growing Tourist Conditions and Excellent Infrastructure 15 Destinations 27 • Substantive Incentives for Certified Investors 16 • GENEVA HOTEL: Significant Contribution to the Bulgarian Tourism Sector 29 • ATM HOTELS 30 • MARRINELLA APARTMENTS: Blend of Modern Accommodation and Bulgarian Hospitality in the Heart of Sofia 32 Regional Director: Suzana Skoko – Business Analysts: Andrej Petrovski & Goran Velkovski – Head of Production: Ivana Popchev – Production Manager: Kally Themistocleous – Editorial: Tomislav Hristov & Snezana Stefanovska – Design: Panche Prendjov The European Times Zinas Kanther 16 – Karantoki Building – 7th Floor, Office 25-26 – 1065 Nicosia – Cyprus Tel.: +357 22 030248 – [email protected] – www.european-times.com The European Times is a division of Crystal Mediacorp Limited.
  • Modernity and Tradition: European and National in Bulgaria

    Modernity and Tradition: European and National in Bulgaria

    MODERNITY AND TRADITION: EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova IMIR MODERNITY AND TRADITION: EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova Project IME: Identities and Modernities in Europe: European and National Identity Construction Programmes, Politics, Culture, History and Religion International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations Sofia, 2012 This book is an outcome of the international research project IME – Identities and Modernities in Europe: European and National Identity Construction Programmes, Politics, Culture, History and Religion (2009-2012). IME was coordinated by Dr. Atsuko Ichijo from the Kingston University, UK. It involved Universities and research institutes from Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The project was funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission (FP7 2007-2013) Theme: SSH-2007-5.2.1 – Histories and Identities: articulating national and European identities Funding scheme: Collaborative projects (small or medium scale focused research projects) Grant agreement no.: 215949 For more information about project IME, visit: http://fass.kingston.ac.uk/research/helen-bamber/ime © Marko Hajdinjak, author, 2012 © Maya Kosseva, author, 2012 © Antonina Zhelyazkova, author, 2012 © International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations, 2012 ISBN: 978-954-8872-70-6 CONTENTS Introduction, Marko Hajdinjak .......................7 Catching Up with the Uncatchable: European Dilemmas and Identity Construction on Bulgarian Path to Modernity, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova, Marko Hajdinjak ..........13 Identity Construction through Education, State Promotion and Diaspora Policies in Bulgaria, Antonina Zhelyazkova, Maya Kosseva, Marko Hajdinjak ..........65 Living Next Door to “Europe”: Bulgarian Education between Tradition and Modernity, and between the European and National, Maya Kosseva, Marko Hajdinjak ....................