DOCSLIB.ORG

The GPA Fiji Fishery Resource Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The GPA Fiji Fishery Resource Profiles FIJI FISHERY RESOURCE PROFILES Information for management on 44 of the most important species groups © 2018 Gillett, Preston and Associates ISBN-13: 978–0–9820263–6–6 ISBN-10: 0–9820263–6–6 Cover photo: Keith Ellenbogen Layout and design: Kate Hodge This study was supported by grants from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Edited by: Sangeeta Mangubhai, Steven Lee, Robert Gillett, Tony Lewis This document should be cited as: Lee, S., A. Lewis, R. Gillett, M. Fox, N. Tuqiri, Y. Sadovy, A. Batibasaga, W. Lalavanua, and E. Lovell. 2018. Fiji Fishery Resource Profiles. Information for Management on 44 of the Most Important Species Groups. Gillett, Preston and Associates and the Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva. 240pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................8 FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................10 INVERTEBRATE FISHERY PROFILES ..........................................................................13 1 SEA CUCUMBERS ..............................................................................................................................................14 1.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 17 1.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 17 2 SEA URCHINS ......................................................................................................................................................21 2.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 22 2.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 22 3 LOBSTERS .............................................................................................................................................................24 3.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 24 3.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 26 3.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 27 4 COCONUT CRAB .................................................................................................................................................30 4.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 31 4.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 31 5 MANGROVE CRAB ..............................................................................................................................................34 5.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 34 5.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 35 5.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 35 5.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 36 6 INSHORE CRUSTACEANS ................................................................................................................................38 6.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 38 6.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 40 6.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 42 6.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 42 7 BROWN LAND CRAB ........................................................................................................................................45 7.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 45 7.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 45 7.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 46 7.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 46 8 FRESHWATER CRUSTACEANS ......................................................................................................................47 8.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 47 8.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 47 8.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 48 8.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 48 Fiji Fishery Resource Profiles 3 9 MONKEY RIVER PRAWN .................................................................................................................................50 9.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 50 9.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 50 9.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 51 9.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 51 10 DEEPWATER MARINE PRAWNS (SHRIMPS) ............................................................................................52 10.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 52 10.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 53 10.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 53 10.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 53 11 GIANT CLAMS .......................................................................................................................................................55 11.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 55 11.2 The Fishery ......................................................................................................................... 57 11.3 Stock Status ........................................................................................................................ 58 11.4 Management ....................................................................................................................... 59 12 BLACK-LIP PEARL OYSTER ............................................................................................................................62 12.1 The Resource ...................................................................................................................... 62 12.2 The Fishery ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ahead of Print Online Version Gyrodactylus Aff. Mugili Zhukov
    Ahead of print online version FoliA PArAsitologicA 60 [5]: 441–447, 2013 © institute of Parasitology, Biology centre Ascr issN 0015-5683 (print), issN 1803-6465 (online) http://folia.paru.cas.cz/ Gyrodactylus aff. mugili Zhukov, 1970 (Monogenoidea: Gyro- dactylidae) from the gills of mullets (Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) collected from the inland waters of southern Iraq, with an evalutation of previous records of Gyrodactylus spp. on mullets in Iraq Delane C. Kritsky1, Atheer H. Ali2 and Najim R. Khamees2 1 Health Education Program, school of Health Professions, idaho state University, Pocatello, idaho, UsA; 2 Department of Fisheries and Marine resources, college of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah, iraq Abstract: Gyrodactylus aff. mugili Zhukov, 1970 (Monogenoidea: gyrodactylidae) is recorded and described from the gill lamellae of 11 of 35 greenback mullet, Chelon subviridis (Valenciennes) (minimum prevalence 31%), from the brackish waters of the shatt Al-Arab Estuary in southern iraq. the gyrodactylid was also found on the gill lamellae of one of eight speigler’s mullet, Valamugil speigleri (Bleeker), from the brackish waters of the shatt Al-Basrah canal (minimum prevalence 13%). Fifteen Klunzinger’s mullet, Liza klunzingeri (Day), and 13 keeled mullet, Liza carinata (Valenciennes), collected and examined from southern iraqi waters, were apparently uninfected. the gyrodactylids from the greenback mullet and speigler’s mullet were considered to have affinity toG. mu- gili Zhukov, 1970, and along with G. mugili may represent members of a species complex occurring on mullets in the indo-Pacific region. A single damaged gyrodactylid from the external surfaces of the abu mullet, Liza abu (Heckel), was insufficient for species identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • FRESHWATER PRAWN Macrobrachium Rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) (Crustacea: Decapoda) AQUACULTURE in FIJI: IMPROVING CULTURE STOCK QUALITY
    FRESHWATER PRAWN Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) (Crustacea: Decapoda) AQUACULTURE IN FIJI: IMPROVING CULTURE STOCK QUALITY by Shalini Singh A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Marine Science Copyright © 2011 by Shalini Singh School of Marine Studies Faculty of Science, Technology and Environment The University of the South Pacific July, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my sponsors, the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and The University of the South Pacific (USP), for providing the opportunity to study for my master’s degree. My sincere thanks and gratitude to my supervisors, Dr. William Camargo (USP), Professor Peter Mather, Dr. Satya Nandlal, and Dr. David Hurwood (Queensland University of Technology - QUT) whose support, encouragement and guidance throughout this study is immensely appreciated. I am also very grateful to the following people for critically editing my thesis: Prof. Peter Mather, Dr. Satya Nandlal, Dr. William Camargo and Dr. Carmen Gonzales. Thank you all for your enormous support and guidance, which led to the successful completion of the project. I thank you all for allocating time from your very busy schedules to read my thesis. I would also like to thank the Fiji Fisheries Freshwater Aquaculture Section, particularly Naduruloulou Research Station, the staff for their immense effort and assistance, particularly in the hatchery and grow-out phases which could not have been successfully carried out without your support. I acknowledge the support, and assistance provided by ACIAR Project Officer Mr. Jone Vasuca and Kameli Lea for their immense effort during this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Pacific Regional Workshop on Mangrove Wetlands Protection and Sustainable Use
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE PACIFIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON MANGROVE WETLANDS PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE USE THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC MARINE STUDIES FACILITY, SUVA, FIJI JUNE 12 – 16, 2001 Hosted by SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Funded by CANADA-SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (C-SPODP II) ORGANISING COMMITTEE South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) Ms Mary Power Ms Helen Ng Lam Institute of Applied Sciences Ms Batiri Thaman Professor William Aalbersberg Editing: Professor William Aalbersberg, Batiri Thaman, Lilian Sauni Compiling: Batiri Thaman, Lilian Sauni ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The organisers of the workshop would like to thank the following people and organisations that contributed to the organising and running of the workshop. § Canada –South Pacific Ocean Deveopment Program (C-SPODP II) for funding the work- shop § South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) for organising the workshop § Institute of Applied Science (IAS) staff for the local organisation of the workshop and use of facilities § The local, regional, and international participants that presented country papers and technical reports § University of the Pacific (USP) dining hall for the catering § USP media centre for assistance with media equipment § Professor Randy Thaman for organising the field trip TABLE OF CONTENTS Organising Committee Acknowledgements Table of Contents Objectives and Expected Outcomes of Workshop Summary Report Technical Reports SESSION I: THE VALUE OF MANGROVE ECOSYSTEMS · The Value of Mangrove Ecosystems:
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents
    Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents Acknowledgements 1 Minister of Fisheries Opening Speech 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 7 2.0 Background 9 2.1 The Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 9 2.2 The biological diversity of the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 11 3.0 Objectives of the FIME Biodiversity Visioning Workshop 13 3.1 Overall biodiversity conservation goals 13 3.2 Specifi c goals of the FIME biodiversity visioning workshop 13 4.0 Methodology 14 4.1 Setting taxonomic priorities 14 4.2 Setting overall biodiversity priorities 14 4.3 Understanding the Conservation Context 16 4.4 Drafting a Conservation Vision 16 5.0 Results 17 5.1 Taxonomic Priorities 17 5.1.1 Coastal terrestrial vegetation and small offshore islands 17 5.1.2 Coral reefs and associated fauna 24 5.1.3 Coral reef fi sh 28 5.1.4 Inshore ecosystems 36 5.1.5 Open ocean and pelagic ecosystems 38 5.1.6 Species of special concern 40 5.1.7 Community knowledge about habitats and species 41 5.2 Priority Conservation Areas 47 5.3 Agreeing a vision statement for FIME 57 6.0 Conclusions and recommendations 58 6.1 Information gaps to assessing marine biodiversity 58 6.2 Collective recommendations of the workshop participants 59 6.3 Towards an Ecoregional Action Plan 60 7.0 References 62 8.0 Appendices 67 Annex 1: List of participants 67 Annex 2: Preliminary list of marine species found in Fiji. 71 Annex 3 : Workshop Photos 74 List of Figures: Figure 1 The Ecoregion Conservation Proccess 8 Figure 2 Approximate
    [Show full text]
  • How to Become a Crab: Phenotypic Constraints on a Recurring Body Plan
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0664.v1 How to become a crab: Phenotypic constraints on a recurring body plan Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Javier Luque1,2,3, Heather D. Bracken-Grissom4 1 Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa–Ancon, 0843–03092, Panama, Panama 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA 4 Institute of Environment and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, 3000 NE 151 Street, North Miami, FL 33181, USA * E-mail: [email protected] Summary: A fundamental question in biology is whether phenotypes can be predicted by ecological or genomic rules. For over 140 years, convergent evolution of the crab-like body plan (with a wide and flattened shape, and a bent abdomen) at least five times in decapod crustaceans has been known as ‘carcinization’. The repeated loss of this body plan has been identified as ‘decarcinization’. We offer phylogenetic strategies to include poorly known groups, and direct evidence from fossils, that will resolve the pattern of crab evolution and the degree of phenotypic variation within crabs. Proposed ecological advantages of the crab body are summarized into a hypothesis of phenotypic integration suggesting correlated evolution of the carapace shape and abdomen. Our premise provides fertile ground for future studies of the genomic and developmental basis, and the predictability, of the crab-like body form. Keywords: Crustacea, Anomura, Brachyura, Carcinization, Phylogeny, Convergent evolution, Morphological integration 1 © 2020 by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Research of the Gobioid Fishes (Perciformes: Gobioidei) in China
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ICHTHYOLOGY, Vol. 21 Supplement, 63-72, July 2009 Received : April 17, 2009 ISSN: 1225-8598 Revised : June 15, 2009 Accepted : July 13, 2009 Taxonomic Research of the Gobioid Fishes (Perciformes: Gobioidei) in China By Han-Lin Wu, Jun-Sheng Zhong1,* and I-Shiung Chen2 Ichthyological Laboratory, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Hucheng Ring Rd., 201306 Shanghai, China 1Ichthyological Laboratory, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Hucheng Ring Rd., 201306 Shanghai, China 2Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202, Taiwan ABSTRACT The taxonomic research based on extensive investigations and specimen collections throughout all varieties of freshwater and marine habitats of Chinese waters, including mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, which involved accounting the vast number of collected specimens, data and literature (both within and outside China) were carried out over the last 40 years. There are totally 361 recorded species of gobioid fishes belonging to 113 genera, 5 subfamilies, and 9 families. This gobioid fauna of China comprises 16.2% of 2211 known living gobioid species of the world. This report repre- sents a summary of previous researches on the suborder Gobioidei. A recently diagnosed subfamily, Polyspondylogobiinae, were assigned from the type genus and type species: Polyspondylogobius sinen- sis Kimura & Wu, 1994 which collected around the Pearl River Delta with high extremity of vertebral count up to 52-54. The undated comprehensive checklist of gobioid fishes in China will be provided in this paper. Key words : Gobioid fish, fish taxonomy, species checklist, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan INTRODUCTION benthic perciforms: gobioid fishes to evolve and active- ly radiate. The fishes of suborder Gobioidei belong to the largest The gobioid fishes in China have long received little group of those in present living Perciformes.
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017
    ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT: AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 PHONE: (808) 522-8220 FAX: (808) 522-8226 www.wpcouncil.org The ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT for the AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 was drafted by the Fishery Ecosystem Plan Team. This is a collaborative effort primarily between the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, NMFS-Pacific Island Fisheries Science Center, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Division of Aquatic Resources (HI) Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources (AS), Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (Guam), and Division of Fish and Wildlife (CNMI). This report attempts to summarize annual fishery performance looking at trends in catch, effort and catch rates as well as provide a source document describing various projects and activities being undertaken on a local and federal level. The report also describes several ecosystem considerations including fish biomass estimates, biological indicators, protected species, habitat, climate change, and human dimensions. Information like marine spatial planning and best scientific information available for each fishery are described. This report provides a summary of annual catches relative to the Annual Catch Limits established by the Council in collaboration with the local fishery management agencies. Edited By: Marlowe Sabater, Asuka Ishizaki, Thomas Remington, and Sylvia Spalding, WPRFMC. This document can be cited as follows: WPRFMC, 2018. Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017. Sabater, M., Ishizaki, A., Remington, T., Spalding, S. (Eds.) Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Resources for Training in Reef Monitoring Skills Suggested Training Plan the Entire Training Course Can Actually Be Taught in a Week’S Time
    APPENDIX 1 Resources for training in reef monitoring skills Suggested training plan The entire training course can actually be taught in a weeks time. However, it is recommended that the training be spread over the course of 3 years in order to allow the team sufficient time to practice under supervision and to allow the study area to actually change in response to management activities enough to be observed. If a community is being trained by external trainers, at least two visits by them should be planned for each year. The trainees should be encouraged to collect data 2 to 4 times a year (i.e. once per season) together with their local development workers. Year & Scheduled Activities Ongoing Season Activities Year 1. Season 1. Introduce the idea of participatory monitoring & evaluation to (e.g. Nov.-Mar.) key community leaders. Check the site for appropriate biophysical and socioeconomic conditions, logistics, and counterpart arrangements and offer to conduct the training. Year 1. Season 2. Review of basic reef ecology and management. Teach Chapters (e.g. Apr.-May) 1-4 and the data collection and recording steps of Chapters 5- 3-4 days 9. Have trainees practice collecting data while experienced people collect baseline data (on the benthos, reef fishes, and invertebrates). Intro to Monitoring & Evaluation of Coral Reefs (1 hr talk) Observing Corals and Algae [data collection] (1 hr talk/ 1 day fieldwork) Observing Reef Fishes [data collection] (1 hr talk/ 1 day fieldwork) Monitoring Fish Catch [data collection] (1-2 hr talk & planning) Human Activities & Natural Disturbances (1 hr talk) Drawing Up a Monitoring Plan (1-2 hr talk & planning) Year 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustaceans Topics in Biodiversity
    Topics in Biodiversity The Encyclopedia of Life is an unprecedented effort to gather scientific knowledge about all life on earth- multimedia, information, facts, and more. Learn more at eol.org. Crustaceans Authors: Simone Nunes Brandão, Zoologisches Museum Hamburg Jen Hammock, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Frank Ferrari, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Photo credit: Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus) by Jeremy Thorpe, Flickr: EOL Images. CC BY-NC-SA Defining the crustacean The Latin root, crustaceus, "having a crust or shell," really doesn’t entirely narrow it down to crustaceans. They belong to the phylum Arthropoda, as do insects, arachnids, and many other groups; all arthropods have hard exoskeletons or shells, segmented bodies, and jointed limbs. Crustaceans are usually distinguishable from the other arthropods in several important ways, chiefly: Biramous appendages. Most crustaceans have appendages or limbs that are split into two, usually segmented, branches. Both branches originate on the same proximal segment. Larvae. Early in development, most crustaceans go through a series of larval stages, the first being the nauplius larva, in which only a few limbs are present, near the front on the body; crustaceans add their more posterior limbs as they grow and develop further. The nauplius larva is unique to Crustacea. Eyes. The early larval stages of crustaceans have a single, simple, median eye composed of three similar, closely opposed parts. This larval eye, or “naupliar eye,” often disappears later in development, but on some crustaceans (e.g., the branchiopod Triops) it is retained even after the adult compound eyes have developed. In all copepod crustaceans, this larval eye is retained throughout their development as the 1 only eye, although the three similar parts may separate and each become associated with their own cuticular lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Fijian Frontiers Richard Smith © 2015
    destination report | kadavu | fiji FIJIAN FRONTIERS RICHARD SMITH © 2015 FIJI IS CONSIDERED BY MANY AS THE SOFT CORAL CAPITAL OF THE WORLD, BUT THIS DIVERSE NATION HAS MUCH MORE TO OFFER THAN SOFT CORALS ALONE. I GUIDED A GROUP OF DIVERS TO KADAVU ISLAnd’S REMOTE SOUTH EASTERN COAST TO SHARe Fiji’S INDIGENOUS MARINE LIFE, STUNNING REEFS DOMINATED BY DIVERSE HARD CORALS, AND TO EXPERIENCE SOME RICH LOCAL CULTURE. rom the capital Nadi, we headed to found in Fiji’s waters almost immediately Kadavu southwest of the main island of on descent, I had high hopes for finding FViti Levu. The 45 minute flight in a 12 some of the others before we left. After a seater plane offered amazing views of the second great dive at Manta Reef and a aquamarine reefs below and the rainforest fleeting visit by a pure black ‘Darth Vader’ wilderness on Kadavu. This is one of the manta we headed back to the resort to try few great stands of forest remaining in the out the house reef. island group and it harbours a wealth of globally important terrestrial animal and Closer to home The resort ‘taxi service’ plant populations, as well as fantastic reefs. dropped us along the reef and we swam back to the resort during the dive. The After landing, a quick hop in a truck, guides explained the highlights and told a couple of boats made the hour long us to swim slowly to appreciate the smaller journey to the resort through endless inhabitants. There were many nudibranchs forests which tumbled into the coral fringed to keep us enthralled for the whole dive.
    [Show full text]
  • SPR(2009) Siquijor
    SAVING PHILIPPINE REEFS Coral Reef Monitoring Expedition to Siquijor Province, Philippines March 21 – 29, 2009 A project of: The Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. (formerly Sulu Fund for Marine Conservation, Inc.) With the participation and support of the Expedition Research Volunteers Summary Field Report: “Saving Philippine Reefs” Coral Reef Monitoring Expedition to Siquijor Province, Philippines March 21 – 29, 2009 A project of: The Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. (formerly Sulu Fund for Marine Conservation, Inc.) With the participation and support of the Expedition Research Volunteers Principal investigators and primary researchers: Alan T. White, Ph.D. The Nature Conservancy Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Roxie Diaz Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. Sheryll C. Tesch Evangeline White Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. Rafael Martinez Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest Project Summary Field Report: “Saving Philippine Reefs” Coral Reef Monitoring Expedition to Siquijor Province, Philippines, March 21 – 29, 2009. Produced by the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. Cebu City, Philippines Citation: White, A.T., R. Diaz, S. Tesch, R. Martinez and E. White. 2010. Summary Field Report: Coral Reef Monitoring Expedition to Siquijor Province, Philippines, March 21 – 29, 2009. The Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc., Cebu City, 76p. CCEF Document No. 01/2010. This publication may be reproduced or quoted in other publications as long as proper reference is made to the source. This report was made possible through the support provided by the Expedition Researchers listed in the appendix and organized through the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc (CCE Foundation) is a non-profit organization concerned with coral reef and coastal conservation in the Philippines.
    [Show full text]