Indici, a Potential Biological Control Agent Fo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.21(1) 2006 7 evolutionary relationships between smuts and grasses. Phylogenetic considerations for predicting the Materials and methods host range of Ustilago sporoboli-indici, a potential Five specimens held in BRIP were used for biological control agent for Sporobolus species in the study (Table 1). DNA was extracted by grinding a small amount of spores (1 Australia mm3) in 50 µL of 5% Chelex-100 (Biorad). The material was spun down briefl y in a James H. CunningtonA and Roger G. ShivasB microcentrifuge. The PCR was performed A Primary Industries Research Victoria (PIRVic), Department of Primary according to Cunnington and Shivas Industries, Knoxfi eld Centre, Private Bag 15, Ferntree Gully Delivery Centre, (2004). The 25 µL reactions contained 1 Victoria 3156, Australia. Email [email protected] µL DNA extract, 200 µM of each dNTP, B Plant Pathology Herbarium, Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1.5mM MgCl2, 2.5 µL 10x buffer, 4 ng each and Fisheries, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia. of primers ITS1-F and ITSUR, and 0.5 units of Taq polymerase. Reaction cycles were 35 cycles of: 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 50°C, 1 min at 72°C. PCR products were puri- fi ed using a QIAquick PCR Purifi cation Summary control agents currently available to man- Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced directly us- The ribosomal DNA internal transcribed age these grasses (McFadyen 1999). In a ing primers ITS5 and ITS4, with an ABI spacer region was amplified and se- preliminary attempt to identify potential PRISM® BIGDYE™ Terminator Cycle Se- quenced from a selection of specimens biological control agents for these species quencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer) according to of the Sporobolus smut Ustilago sporobo- the second author visited South Africa in the manufacturers instructions. These se- li-indici. Phylogenetic comparison with December 2002 to survey for plant patho- quences were aligned with a wide range of other Ustilago and Sporisorium species genic fungi on Sporobolus spp. During this ITS sequences for other Ustilago and Spori- revealed strong support for an evolution- survey the smut fungus Ustilago sporoboli- sorium species (obtained from GenBank) ary radiation of Ustilago species infect- indici Y.Ling was often collected, particu- using ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1997). A ing the Chloridoideae and Pooideae, of larly on S. pyramidalis. These specimens neighbour-joining tree was created using which U. sporoboli-indici forms a major have been deposited in herbaria BRIP the Kimura-2-parameter method with a lineage. Comparisons are made with (Queensland Department of Primary In- complete deletion of gaps using MEGA other groups of plant pathogenic fungi, dustries and Fisheries, Plant Pathology (Kumar et al. 2001). One thousand boot- and it is concluded that phylogenetic Herbarium) and HUV (Herbarium Usti- strap replicates were performed. analyses of potential biocontrol agents laginales Vánky). Ustilago sporoboli-indici Of the fi ve specimens chosen for this are useful for identifying pathogens that produces sori in the leaves, leaf sheaths work, the ITS region was successfully am- are derived from evolutionary lineages and stems, rendering shoots sterile (Vánky plifi ed and sequenced from four. These that parasitize a wide range of unrelated 2003). The smut appears to be systemic sequences were identical and have been plants. Such pathogens are less desirable and usually all shoots of an infected plant deposited in GenBank (Table 1.). The rea- as biocontrol agents as they may have a are sterile. The smut is characterized by son for the failure to amplify the fi fth spec- greater likelihood of infecting plants sori that appear as bullate, lead-coloured imen was probably due to a poor DNA outside their normal host ranges. striae and yellowish-brown spores 7–11.5 extraction. A nested amplifi cation may Keywords: co-evolution, Ustilagino- µm long. It is known on S. africanus, S. elon- have overcome this (Cunnington and Shi- mycetes, Chloridoideae gatus R.Br. and S. pyrimadalis, from Africa, vas 2004), however as the sequences from China and the Philippines (Vánky 2003). the other four specimens were identical Introduction A phylogenetic analysis of the genus it was deemed that further work on the Sporobolus grasses (Sporobolus spp.) are a Ustilago (and the closely related genus fi fth, or indeed any further specimens, was major group of unpalatable weedy plants Sporisorium) has recently been inves- unwarranted. in Australia. The South African sporobo- tigated by Stoll et al. (2003) using ribos- lus grasses in the complex comprising S. omal DNA internal transcribed spacer Results and discussion africanus (Poir.) Robyns & Tournay, S. fi m- sequences. Among other evolutionary Phylogenetic analysis revealed a tree (Fig- briatus (Trin.) Nees, S. natalensis (Steud.) trends, this study revealed that particular ure 1) similar to that produced by Stoll et Dur. & Schinz and S. pyramidalis P.Beauv. lineages of smut fungi were found to occur al. (2003). It consists of four main lineages, are becoming increasingly important only on specifi c groups (often tribes) of two of these comprise Sporisorium species, weeds that adversely affect agricultural grasses. This project aimed to determine one contains only Ustilago maydis, while and environmental areas in eastern Aus- the phylogenetic position of U. sporoboli- the fi nal lineage comprises Ustilago spe- tralia (Anon. 2001). There are no biological indici in relation to previously identifi ed cies. Ustilago sporoboli-indici resides in this Table 1. Specimens used and GenBank accessions for rDNA ITS sequences. Specimen Host Locality Collection Date GenBank accession BRIP 39706 Sporobolus pyramidalis Nylstroom, Limpopo, South Africa 8 Dec. 2002 AY772736 BRIP 39709 “ Bergville, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 10 Dec. 2002 AY772737 BRIP 39711 “ Kokstad, Eastern Cape, South Africa 11 Dec. 2002 AY772738 BRIP 39712 “ Bizana, Eastern Cape, South Africa 12 Dec. 2002 AY772739 BRIP 44549 “ Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa 20 Dec. 2002 N/A 8 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.21(1) 2006 Ustilago lineage, which, like that found by AF135430 Ustilago nuda # 65 Stoll et al. was found to have weak boot- AY344997 Ustilago avenae # 63 strap support (66). Within Ustilago, Stoll AF105224 Ustilago hordei # et al. found two major lineages. Ustilago AY344996 Ustilago avenae # sporoboli-indici falls within the fi rst of these 99 AY345010 Ustilago turcomanica # (bootstrap support of 85), which contains AY345005 Ustilago pamirica # a lineage of smut fungi predominantly in- fecting the Pooideae (temperate cereals) AF135423 Ustilago bullata # 58 and a lineage predominantly infecting AF135424 Ustilago tritici # the Chloridoideae (Figure 1). Ustilago spo- BRIP 39706 Ustilago sporoboli-indici * roboli-indici appears to form a third lineage BRIP 39711 Ustilago sporoboli-indici * within this group. As Sporobolus grasses 52 are also members of the Chloridoideae, the 100 BRIP 39709 Ustilago sporoboli-indici * results here agree with the fi ndings of Stoll BRIP 39712 Ustilago sporoboli-indici * et al., by demonstrating that the Ustilago 85 AY345000 Ustilago cynodontis * and Sporisorium species occurring on the 91 AY345008 Ustilago sparsa * Chloridoideae are from a single evolution- 30 88 AY345012 Ustilago xerochloae ary lineage within Ustilago. The remainder AY344970 Sporisorium aegyptiacus of Ustilago and Sporisorium species in Fig- ure 1 occur almost entirely on the Pani- AY345011 Ustilago vetiveriae 66 coideae. 53 AY345006 Ustilago schroeteriana Using these results to infer the po- AY345009 Ustilago trichophora tential host range for U. sporoboli-indici 44 AY345002 Ustilago esculenta is more diffi cult. The broad implication 25 AY345001 Ustilago echinata # is that this smut is much more likely to infect the Chloridoideae and Pooideae, AY344993 Sporisorium veracruzianum 53 than any other grass groups. However, U. 36 AY344999 Ustilago crameri sporoboli-indici is not particularly close to 100 AY344995 Ustilago affinis other groups of smut fungi infecting these 97 AY344983 Sporisorium mishrae tribes. This is in contrast to the group of AY344988 Sporisorium provinciale Ustilago species on the Pooideae, which are closely related as shown by the short AY344979 Sporisorium formosanum 97 branch lengths between the species (Fig- 37 89 AF045871 Sporisorium destruens ure 1.). Sequences from other Ustilago and AY344969 Sporisorium tumefaciens Sporisorium species that infect the Chlori- 69 AY344986 Sporisorium panici-leucophaei doideae, and specifi cally Sporobolus spe- 90 AY344972 Sporisorium cenchri cies, would provide a clearer resolution of the relationships between Ustilago species AY344987 Sporisorium polliniae 11 infecting the Chloridoideae. AY344971 Sporisorium catharticum 49 There have been few reports that used 40 AY344991 Sporisorium themedae-arguentis phylogenetic data for plant pathogenic 99 AY344973 Sporisorium chrysopogonis fungi when looking for biocontrol agents. AY345004 Ustilago maydis Berthier et al. (1996) used ITS region poly- morphisms to infer two host-specialized AY344990 Sporisorium puellare 89 taxa within Puccinia carduorum Jacky, but 100 AY344992 Sporisorium trachypogonicola this was more a molecular taxonomic study, 28 AY344982 Sporisorium paspali-notati than a phylogenetic analysis of this group 44 AY344974 Sporisorium cruentum of rusts. The lack of use of phylogenetic 100 AY344984 Sporisorium moniliferum analysis when looking for plant pathogen- ic fungi in weed control is probably