New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan PMS 166 CVC Orange PMS 123 CVC Y e llow PMS 355 C Green PMS 280 CVC Blue New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan PMS 166 CVC Orange PMS 123 CVC Y e llow PMS 355 C Green PMS 280 CVC Blue City of Takoma Park Mayor and Council Consultant: TND Planning Group Stuart Sirota, Project Manager City of Takoma Park Staff in collaboration with: Barbara Matthews, City Manager Randall Gross, Development Economics Sara Daines, Director of Housing and Community Development Barry Mahaffey, Rettew Associates Ilona Blanchard, Community Development Coordinator Shaun Barattia, Rettew Associates David Suls, Associate Planner John Moynahan, Urban Design and Planning Paul Grenier, Planning Staff Kevin Klinkenberg, 180 Degree Design Studio Martin Salmon, Planning Staff Brian Hendrickson, 180 Degree Design Studio Dan Jarrell, 180 Degree Design Studio Maryland National Capital Planning Commission Rick Hall, Hall Planning and Engineering, Inc. John Marcolin, Montgomery County M-NCPPC Kathy Poole, Poole Design Aldea Douglas, Prince George’s County M-NCPPC City of Takoma Park 2 New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan Table of Contents Page 1. Background 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 Historic context 8 1.3 Planning process and approach 10 2. Analysis 2.1 Planning areas 14 2.2 Land use and zoning 18 2.3 Transportation network 19 2.4 Business conditions and market opportunities 22 2.5 Natural environment and open space 27 2.6 Precedents 29 3. Plan recommendations 3.1 Corridor-wide recommendations 35 3.2 Planning-area specific recommendations 45 4. Implementation 64 4.1 Strategy for redevelopment 64 4.2 Priorities and phasing 66 3 4 1. Background 5 1. Background 1.1 Introduction he City of Takoma Park initiated this plan in establishments along the corridor despite their after the City master plan identified the need. Trecognition of the need and potential for proximity. redeveloping the New Hampshire Avenue Corridor. In August 2007, the City, citizens, property owners, New Hampshire Avenue (Maryland Route 650) is a In 2000, the Takoma Park Master Plan identified the and businesses of Takoma Park and neighboring major roadway linking the District of Columbia to two commercial areas along the corridor as priorities jurisdictions, along with the town planning firm of Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, and for pedestrian-oriented, neighborhood serving TND Planning Group, gathered to create a plan for points beyond in Maryland. New Hampshire Avenue redevelopment. These commercial areas are referred the redevelopment of the corridor. This document lies directly adjacent to much of Takoma Park’s eastern to as the Ethan Allen Gateway, around the intersection presents the recommendations that form the basis for edge. Yet travelers unfamiliar with the area easily drive of Ethan Allen Avenue/East-West Highway (Maryland the concept plan. through without realizing that Takoma Park exists or Route 410) and New Hampshire Avenue, and the seeing what it has to offer. What they do see, however, Maryland Gateway, which extends from the District is an area that has been in decline for some time and of Columbia line at Eastern Avenue north to just south is widely viewed as unappealing and sometimes of Poplar Avenue/Ray Road along New Hampshire unsafe. Similarly, many area residents do not feel the Avenue. Developing a shared vision for improving the corridor is an asset to the community in its current corridor and a conceptual framework for implementing state and generally avoid patronizing the commercial that vision was the next step to improving the corridor Ethan Allen Gateway: view north on New Hampshire Avenue from east sidewalk. Maryland Gateway: view northeast from Eastern Avenue towards New Hampshire Avenue. City of Takoma Park 6 New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan This aerial photograph shows the corridor outlined in red. It is approximately 1.25 miles long, extending from the District of Columbia line at Eastern Avenue, north to the intersection of Sligo Creek Parkway. The corridor includes the commercial properties in the two gateway areas, the New Hampshire Avenue right- Ethan Allen Gateway of-way, as well as a number of other parcels that have the potential to be improved. Maryland Gateway 7 1. Background 1.2 Historic context In the 1890s, Prince George’s County, but remained Takoma Park was T a two-lane country road, effectively a tiny enclave well akoma Park, founded in 1883, was the forming the eastern edge of Takoma beyond the edge first “railroad suburb” of Washington, DC. Park. Immediately east of New of Washington, During its early years, it was an enclave Hampshire Avenue lay several miles accessible primarily of Victorian and bungalow homes “out of rolling countryside all the way to by train. in the country,” considerably removed Hyattsville and College Park, similar from the city itself. By the end of World railroad suburbs along another rail War II, development within the District corridor emanating from Washington. of Columbia had encroached to the southern and western edges of Takoma The rural areas between these Park. However the areas to the north developed rail corridors, and areas and east were still largely rural. beyond, rapidly began to develop soon after the end of WWII, as an New Hampshire Avenue had been unprecedented demand for housing extended north from the District into from returning GI’s, coupled with a new form of automobile-centric upgraded and widened to keep up suburbanization took hold in the with ever-increasing traffic volumes, Washington, DC region and the U.S. Vast as it evolved into a primary commuter tracts of mass-produced housing were corridor between booming “bedroom” developed to meet the burgeoning communities in Prince George’s demand. With this also came a new and Montgomery Counties and the form of arterial roadway, designed to downtown employment centers of move large volumes of cars quickly and Washington, DC. efficiently, as well as shopping centers designed for the convenience of Most of the development that occurred automobiles. In the following decades, along this new suburban corridor Takoma Park was an original “transit oriented development.” New Hampshire Avenue was repeatedly reflected the automobile-oriented City of Takoma Park 8 New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Concept Plan MINTER PL S LI G A G O L G C R H A L R E E E IL R E V N E M A T L K L S A N O A P O I K P S N N R K D MERW D C A D E OOD DR Y JA V S E A D L N E R IG HA V R D O C E C T R R D E E E O JE K S F P O E FE K C V O W A RS T O SL T C D N N I T E L O A G N I M V O A E E C T W RE R V R F E E A EK L P A K V E D R D R SL O IG F O R C E R V EE A K H PK N S I L A IG G O A C R R A E E C K T P K E FL V OW A E R A Y VE R R E H development pattern in the postwar During the past decade, there has been C E RSKIN E E ST This aerial view of V A SLIGO CREEK PK L L K PK S EE E O O CR H S SLIG V E R L IG A R R O A I C H D C E R A V E T N A EK 3 P 1 A N K S V E L E P A IG S S O A P C E R N E era: functional and utilitarian, yet an influx in international residents that C EK T K PK the corridor in 1951 P K E E R C O E VE S THER A G A B V L HE O I A I Y G L D O S AV Y C E R R R E E E K E H P V lacking the pedestrian-friendly scale has resulted in a marked change in C A K M shows the rapid pace of L L L P IN E ON D S E EL N C IR IR C R L E I O N V C N A E A O V L M N N A COLBY L O A AVE I N V N S D E E E K E E R P I or small town character that typified the corridor. These new residents are C V N S H A A S JA A V suburban development D E P R M A A H W Y W A E H N R AVE H HESTE I WINC L L W M O A O older neighborhoods like Takoma Park. more apt to walk and use public transit N D O which occurred in the R C D T R The corridor remained this way during than their predecessors and there are VE LE A early post-war period. YRT M E CT AV YD D O OO B W ZE AI GL LA R C H A D V L much of the last forty years. more people out on the street. Small E E IN V D O E NS N ET HI A H RE V AN R E A D L K LE E N N AV T LA N D A V A E UB VE U ELL A RN PEW RD A HO N businesses and shops along the corridor V SO E The boundary line OL S Y C A Prior to 1997, the entire study area was in largely cater to the new arrivals.
Recommended publications
  • Purple Line Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Crossing
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 1, 2018 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Purple Line Light Rail Transit Facility 7949 Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Montgomery County, Maryland NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER 76.45.02(41.23)44678 SUBMITTED BY Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning APPLICANT’S REQUEST Commission Approval of preliminary and final site development plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Capper Cramton Act Review Approve preliminary and final site per 46 Stat. 482 development plans ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY On behalf of the Maryland Transit Authority, the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission has requested preliminary and final review of site development plans on Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park property to accommodate the new Purple Line light rail transit facility. The new transit line will cross through the park along Wayne Avenue (within its vehicular traffic lanes), across Sligo Creek via a new (widened) bridge and across the Sligo Creek Parkway. The Purple Line is planned as a 16-mile, regionally-significant, transit facility between Bethesda, Maryland (Montgomery County) and New Carrollton, Maryland (Prince George’s County), providing east- west connectivity between the Metrorail’s Red, Orange, and Green Lines. Construction will occur between 2018-2021 within the Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park. KEY INFORMATION • NCPC has approval authority of the project since the site is located on property acquired with federal funding appropriated under the 1930 Capper Cramton Act. The Act was intended to provide for the acquisition of lands in Maryland and Virginia to develop a comprehensive park, parkway, and playground system in the National Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership History of the Mount Washington Summit1
    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Inter-Department Communication DATE: July 23, 2018 FROM: K. Allen Brooks AT (OFFICE) Department of Justice Senior Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau SUBJECT: Ownership of Mount Washington Summit TO: The Mount Washington Commission ____________________________________ Ownership History of the Mount Washington Summit1 The ownership history of the summit of Mount Washington is interwoven with that of Sargent’s Purchase, Thompson and Meserve’s Purchase, and numerous other early grants and conveyances in what is now Coos County. Throughout these areas, there has never been a shortage of controversy. Confusion over what is now called Sargent’s Purchase began as far back as 1786 when the Legislature appointed McMillan Bucknam to sell certain state lands. Bucknam conveyed land described as being southwest of Roger’s Location, Treadwell’s Location, and Wentworth’s 1 The following history draws extensively from several N.H. Supreme Court opinions (formerly called the Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire) and to a lesser extent from various deeds and third-party information, specifically – Wells v. Jackson Iron Mfg. Co., 44 N.H. 61 (1862); Wells v. Jackson Iron Mfg. Co., 47 N.H. 235 (1866); Wells v. Jackson Iron Mfg. Co., 48 N.H. 491 (1869); Wells v. Jackson Iron Co., 50 N.H. 85 (1870); Coos County Registry of Deeds – (“Book/Page”) B8/117; B9/241; B9/245; B9/246; B9/247; B9/249; B9/249; 12/170; 12/172; B15/122; B15/326; 22/28; B22/28; B22/29; 22/68; B25/255; B28/176; B28/334; B30/285; B30/287;
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Washington Observatory
    BLOWN AWAY Interns Experience Science, Research, and Life on Top of Mount Washington BY ERIC KELSEY, CYRENA-MARIE BRIEDÉ, KAITLYN O’BRIEN, THomAS PADHAM, MATTHEW CANN, LUke DAVIS, AND ALEXANDER CARNE Mount Washington Observatory’s summer internship program engages interns in weather observing, research, and life at the “Home of the World’s Worst Weather.” ost Americans associate the month of May with (KMWN; 1,917 m MSL), however, they were greeted warm temperatures, fresh green foliage, and by winter: subfreezing temperatures, snow, rime ice, Mblooming flowers. Indeed, these are the conditions and hurricane-force winds. It is the allure of the famed that the five incoming Mount Washington Observatory extreme weather conditions synonymous with Mount (MWO) 2013 summer interns (Fig. 1) experienced as Washington and the desire to become intimately en- they arrived in Pinkham Notch for their first trip up gaged in weather observation, forecasting, and research the mountain to start their internships. Upon arrival that attracts many of the 30–50 applicants for the at the summit of Mount Washington, New Hampshire summer internship positions offered each year (C.-M. Briedé, 2013, personal communication with applicants). AFFILIATIONS: KELSEY—Mount Washington Observatory, North Through geoscience research opportunities, such Conway, and Department of Atmospheric Science and Chemis- as internships and research experiences for under- try, Plymouth State University, Plymouth, New Hampshire; BRIEDÉ, O'BRIEN, and PADHAM—Mount Washington Observatory,
    [Show full text]
  • City of Manchester, New Hampshire 908 Elm Street Manchester New
    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE New Hampshire COUNTY: NATIONAL REG ISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES „. , , .,.„_„ , Y - NOMINATION FORM %o° N°"u^ ON. v ————— INVENTOR rUK Nro Uot UNL-' ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - .complete applicable sections); ....... ; - - -- U': ^ ]GV- 9ii^MWiiiliim^ COMMON: ' ' . ' ......;, <^'- ' — " " ; "'^^V. Manchester City Hall .- "—'•''•" >, AND/OR HISTORIC: / '• Manchester City Hall /- *. ':'.- '':.:;:;:':":: ^.:;: ^ ;;: ^i::;:::: :;S::^:;:::;::::::S:::::S!:SS^ :^ i:._:^x V ; i_ix^ : x: : : x : x: : :x:x: :i V: ^-f HX- ii! x :. x-x -•:.••': x : . X;>XxXx::X-:: xXxX: : .X:XxXxX:X:XxXxX::xXxX: x;xXxX XiXxXx^XxXXx^XxX;; xx-xXxX:^. y.,- . ::--;-:- :•: . x: x : : x.xXxxxox : X : X x x : • - / -XX x ::- ::.x :x xx : x;.: ::;X;: ::;X; STREET AND NUMBER: 908 Elm Street !~j: --^i' OK $7F .-;„ CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSION Ali-DISTRlCT: Manchester FirstV: l :^""^;.:;v? ^ ^ STATE CODE COUNTY: \<v ,\ "•••-'-• 'j£I[? , C O^E Nex<7 Hampshire 03X01 33 Hills bo r ov^hv .. x • ' *-. 0^1 1 l^lielAMFlCATION :< ^'1 -i :-:^:::i^'::'5^-'iS-i::-?Si'i':^^^S:itti :: '--' :- ; '-: :^ CATEGORY CO " OWNERS*' P ' STATUS^^TO^EES PUBLLE,C (Check One) Z Q District gg Building g] Public Public Acquisition: (^ Occupied Yes: O CD Site Q Structure D Private D In Process Q Unoccupied ° Restricted D Object D Both D Being Considered r-j Preservation work ® Unrestricted 1- in progress ' — ' u PRESENT USE (Check One or Afore as Approprfafe) CD Agricultural Cjt Go vernment [~] Park [~| Transportation CD Comments or CD Commercial CD ' m ustrial n Private Residence Q Other (Speclfv) CD Educational CD Mi itary | | Reliqious CD Entertainment CD MlJ seum ( ) Scientific CO •z.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Directory of Assisted Housing in New Hampshire
    2020 DIRECTORY OF ASSISTED HOUSING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE 2019 Directory of Assisted Housing New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY 2020 DIRECTORY OF ASSISTED HOUSING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS Discrimination in Housing .................................................................................. 3 Addresses of Federal Agencies ........................................................................ 3 Housing Authorities ............................................................................................. 4 Housing and Services for Special Needs Populations ............................ 5 HOUSING BY COUNTY Belknap County ................................................................................................... 6 Carroll County ...................................................................................................... 11 Cheshire County .................................................................................................. 18 Coos County ......................................................................................................... 23 Grafton County ..................................................................................................... 27 Hillsborough County ........................................................................................... 34 Merrimack County ................................................................................................ 52 Rockingham County .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown University Frequently Asked Questions
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ADDRESS Georgetown University 37th and O Streets, NW Washington, DC 20057 DIRECTIONS TO GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY From Reagan National Airport (20 minutes) This airport is the closest airport to Georgetown University. A taxicab ride from Reagan National costs approximately $15-$20 one way. Take the George Washington Parkway North. Follow signs for Key Bridge/Route 50. Follow until Key Bridge exit. You will want to be in the left lane as you cross over Key Bridge. At the end of Key Bridge take a left at the light. This is Canal Road. Enter campus at the Hoya Saxa sign, to the right. This road will take you to main campus parking. See attached campus map for further directions. From Washington/Dulles Airport (40 minutes) Taxicabs from Dulles International cost approximately $50-$55 one way. Follow Dulles airport Access road to I-66. Follow I-66 to the Key Bridge Exit. Exit and stay in left lane. At the third light take a left and stay in one of the middle lanes. You will want to be in the left lane as you cross over Key Bridge. At the end of Key Bridge take a left at the light. This is Canal Road. Enter campus at the Hoya Saxa sign, to the right. This road will take you to main campus parking. See attached campus map for further directions. From New York to Washington D.C. By car, approximately 230 miles (4.5 hours) www.mapquest.com By train (approx 3 hours) approx. $120 each way www.amtrak.com By plane (approx 1.5 hours) approx $280 www.travelocity.com ACCOMMODATION The following hotels are closest to the University, for other hotel and discounted rates, you may like to try: www.cheaptickets.com www.cheaphotels.com Note: You can often get better rates through the above site than going through the hotel directly.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Boston MA-NH Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area
    New Hampshire Commuting Patterns - 1990 U.S. Census 2.0 the larger population, had 3,207 estimated a smaller scale for South Hampton, Rochester Boston MA-NH residents working. Of these, 2,009 workers provided the greater number of in-state work- commuted out to another town and 1,198 ers, while Amesbury MA and Gloucester MA Primary residents stayed in town to work. South Hamp- furnished workers for South Hampton from Metropolitan ton had 90.2% of its 367 workers commuting out of state. Statistical Area out of town and a nonresidents commuting (NH portion) into town rate of 73.9% (102 workers). Based on those percentages, only 9.8% of its estimated resident workers stayed in town, and they made up 26.1% of the total South Hampton workforce. Both towns are accessible via Route US1, and Interstates 95 and 495, as well as rural and urban Routes NH51 and NH286. Even though the two towns differed in popula- tion size, when it came to commuting out, particularly out-of-state, the two towns pro- duced similar percentage rates. Seabrook sent 1,359 commuters to Massachusetts, almost 68 percent of the total workers who commuted out of town. South Hampton sent 235 workers to the Bay State, nearly a 71 percent out-of-state commuter rate for that town. Both commuter groups were distributed over the North Shore region and Boston along Interstate 95 and This newly formed New Hampshire compo- Route US1. For those that stayed in state, Table nent of the Boston Primary Metropolitan 2.2 indicates a combined total of 261 Seabrook Statistical Area (PMSA) is made up of two commuters traveled to Hampton and Ports- towns in the southeastern tip of Rockingham mouth, while 15 South Hampton commuters County; Seabrook and South Hampton.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE on Motion to Dismiss Complaint
    532US3 Unit: $U60 [09-06-02 19:13:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 742 OCTOBER TERM, 2000 Syllabus NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MAINE on motion to dismiss complaint No. 130, Orig. Argued April 16, 2001—Decided May 29, 2001 New Hampshire and Maine share a border that runs from northwest to southeast. At the border’s southeastern end, New Hampshire’s east- ernmost point meets Maine’s southernmost point. The boundary in this region follows the Piscataqua River eastward into Portsmouth Harbor and, from there, extends in a southeasterly direction into the sea. In 1977, in a dispute between the two States over lobster fish- ing rights, this Court entered a consent judgment setting the precise location of the States’ “lateral marine boundary,” i. e., the boundary in the marine waters off the coast, from the closing line of Portsmouth Harbor five miles seaward. New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U. S. 363; New Hampshire v. Maine, 434 U. S. 1, 2. The Piscataqua River bound- ary was fixed by a 1740 decree of King George II at the “Middle of the River.” See 426 U. S., at 366–367. In the course of litigation, the two States proposed a consent decree in which they agreed, inter alia, that the descriptive words “Middle of the River” in the 1740 decree refer to the middle of the Piscataqua River’s main navigable channel. Rejecting the Special Master’s view that the quoted words mean the geographic middle of the river, this Court accepted the States’ inter- pretation and directed entry of the consent decree.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction & Resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue
    Reconstruction & Resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue Construction District Department of Transportation (DDOT) August 29, 2012 1 Stakeholders Meeting Agenda Welcome Planning Study Overview Presented By: Richard Kenney Construction Project Overview Presented By: AECOM- Joseph Chukwueke Public Involvement Effort Updates Presented By: Capitol Services Management, Inc.- Ian Swain 2 New Hampshire Avenue Reconstruction/Resurfacing Project • Historical Overview & Perspective • Construction Details • Project Schedule 3 Project Boundaries Reconstruction Resurfacing 4 Project Goals and Objectives DDOT’s New Hampshire Avenue Project seeks to: • Improve Safety, Accessibility and Mobility • Reconstruct/Resurface deteriorated pavement along New Hampshire Avenue • Enhance the Community Streetscape through a design that is safe, sustainable and enriching 5 Historical Overview Project Development Initial scope of work included resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue from Virginia Avenue to Washington Circle & Reconstruction of New Hampshire Avenue from Washington Circle to Dupont Circle – February 2005 Preliminary plans (30%) submitted – January 2006 Washington Circle Pedestrian-Vehicle Traffic Study was added to the scope The study was completed with development of two alternatives for crosswalk layout in Washington Circle after meetings with NPS, ANC, and DDOT The recommendations from this study were incorporated into this project Intermediate Plans (65%) submitted – March 2010 The New Hampshire Avenue between M Street and Washington Circle made two-
    [Show full text]
  • Special Hotel Deals
    Below please find the list of the participating hotels for the Washington, DC Travel Professionals Vacation Incentive Program. Special rates for Travel Professionals Rates will be valid for stays vary and will be provided to you along with a special rate July 1st - September 2, 2019 code once you have registered. • All rates are net, non-commissionable • Rate and room availability is based on space Washington, DC available • DC VIP discounts are valid for all members of Beacon Hotel and Corporate Quarters your party 1615 Rhode Island Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20010 • To ensure rate integrity to the travel industry, special rates will be disclosed aer registration Capitol Hill Hotel which can be found at: 200 C Street SE, Washington DC, 20003 washington.org/travel-professionals-month Conrad Washington DC 950 New York Avenue, Washington DC, 20001 Courtyard by Marriott Washington, DC/U.S. Capitol Hyatt Place Washington | Georgetown | Westend 1325 2nd Street NE, Washington DC 20002 2121 M Street NW. Washington DC 20037 Days Inn by Wyndham - Washington DC/Connecticut Ave Kimpton Carlyle Hotel 4400 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20008 1731 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington DC 20009 The Dupont Circle Hotel Kimpton Hotel Donovan 1500 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington DC 20036 1155 14th Street NW. Washington DC 20005 Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott - Washington, DC/ Kimpton George Hotel Downtown 15 E Street NW, Washignton DC 20001 500 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Kimpton Glover Park Hotel The Embassy Row Hotel 2505 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Washington DC 20007 2015 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Kimpton Hotel Madera 1310 New Hampshire Avenue NW Washington DC The Hay-Adams 20036 800 16th Street NW Washington DC 20006 Kimpton Mason & Rock Hotel Hampton Inn Washington DC - NoMA/ Union Station 1430 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington DC 20005 501 New York Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Existing Conditions Takoma/Langley Crossroads
    BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Takoma/Langley Crossroads Preliminary Sector Plan BACKGROUND Project Description The Takoma/Langley Crossroads (TLC) plan area is a physically aging yet thriving multicultural community located along the border of Montgomery County and Prince George’s County in Maryland. The area was named the Takoma/Langley Crossroads during the 1980s by a group of community business leaders who recognized an opportunity to unite the strengths of the businesses in unincorporated Langley Park in Prince George’s County to those within the City of Takoma Park in Montgomery County. The plan area core is a mixture of low- to medium-density strip commercial centers around which are a variety of housing types with single-family detached dwellings predominant south of University Boulevard and typical post-World War II-style garden apartments predominant to the north. The Takoma/Langley Crossroads is considered Maryland’s International Corridor due to this community’s highly diverse racial and ethnic population and its concentration of businesses that cater to both the multicultural neighborhood and a regional clientele. Maintaining the International Corridor aspects of the TLC is a priority of this sector plan. In addition to sustaining the local residential diversity of the area, the sector plan purpose is to maintain the TLC’s current role as a commercial center for numerous ethnic groups in the region, a market that gives Takoma/Langley Crossroads a unique economic base for the future. The unincorporated community of Langley Park was designated a community center by the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan because of the potential for a Purple Line station at the intersection of New Hampshire Avenue and University Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • 1200 New Hampshire Avenue's Tenant® Portal
    1200 New Hampshire Avenue Electronic Tenant® Portal Created on September 26, 2021 Amenities: Fitness Facility 1200 New Hampshire offers access for all tenant employees (no guests to include personal trainers) to the self-use Fitness Facility located at the rear of the main lobby. The Fitness Facility provides an aerobics area complete with TV/DVD, as well as an exercise room that includes a multi-station Hoist weight machine, treadmills, stair climbers and stationary bikes. Separate women’s and men’s locker rooms are provided, each containing lockers, showers and restrooms. Lockers are for temporary use only. Personal contents must be removed daily after use. All items left will be placed in lost and found. Contact the security guard regarding lost and found. Each Employee is required to sign a waiver and turn it into the management office prior to using the facility. The original form may be obtained through the management office. The Management Office will then notify Datawatch to authorize the employee’s access card for entry into facility and for women access to women’s locker room. Click here to download the Fitness Center Rules and Regulations Amenities: Parking Parking at 1200 New Hampshire is provided by Colonial Parking, Inc. The garage entrance is located off of M Street. Monthly parking passes can be obtained by visiting the Colonial website, or call our Customer Care Department at 202-295-8080. Tenants with monthly parking contracts will have their Datawatch cards activated for the garage to allow access after normal business hours. The garage is open and staffed: Monday through Thursday from 4:30 am to 10:00 pm Friday from 4:30 am to 12 midnight Saturday from 10:00 am to 12 midnight Sunday from 10:00 am until 10:00 pm Tenants with monthly parking contracts will also be able to access the garage after hours and on weekends by using their Datawatch cards.
    [Show full text]