Legislative Assembly
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
17850 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Tuesday 22 September 2009 __________ The Speaker (Mr George Richard Torbay) took the chair at 1.00 p.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Notices of Motions General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) given. PRIVATE MEMBERS' STATEMENTS __________ BONDI ROAD CLEARWAY PROPOSAL Mr PAUL PEARCE (Coogee) [1.09 p.m.]: Today I bring to the attention of the House a matter of concern to my electorate, namely, the proposal by the Roads and Traffic Authority to create a clearway on the southern side of Bondi Road westbound, between the hours of 3.00 p.m. and 7.00 p.m. every Saturday, Sunday and public holiday from December until the end of February. This system was trialled last year and was found to be detrimental to my community. The Roads and Traffic Authority guaranteed that a full review would be undertaken, including the impact on the community and local businesses along Bondi Road. The Roads and Traffic Authority produced a typical report, which deals purely with traffic flow issues. The history of the matter is that for a number of years the Roads and Traffic Authority wanted a clearway down Bondi Road to increase the amount of traffic going to Bondi Beach. In reality, once motorists reach the beach, there is nowhere to park. It is fairly common knowledge that if every resident with a vehicle in Bondi Beach in fact parked their car on the road, there would be more cars than there are on-street parking spaces, and that is before any visitors arrive! The rationale of encouraging more traffic into the Bondi basin is nonsensical. I will leave the debate on that to my colleague the member for Vaucluse in whose electorate Bondi is situated. My concern relates to the southern side of Bondi Road in the electorate of Coogee. The Roads and Traffic Authority carried out a trial under the guise of creating improved public transport flow. I have a copy of the report and assessment on this matter prepared by the Roads and Traffic Authority. It should be noted that the report contains a number of fallacies. For a start, the measurement refers to traffic flow and does not involve any increase in bus journeys. The only difference is a couple of minutes saved from point to point in bus journeys; there is no increase in the number of bus journeys. However, there is an increase in the amount of traffic flowing up Bondi Road in a westerly direction. Therefore, the argument that this will encourage greater public transport usage is nonsense. To the contrary, it will encourage people to drive their vehicles into the Bondi basin in the false expectation they will have somewhere to park and then be able leave the area. The proposal fails to take into account the detrimental affect this will have on the amenity of the area. Interestingly, the Roads and Traffic Authority sent out surveys to residents, covering virtually the entire area of the basin between Bondi Road and Curlewis Street to the north. However, the impact is on the southern side of Bondi Road in the electorate of Coogee, where surveys were only handed out back one street length into the neighbourhood. Needless to say, very few responses were received. However, I circulated a couple of thousand letters and received many responses from residents in that area in opposition to the proposal. I have also been in regular contact with the chamber of commerce. I state for the information of the House that with respect to the loss of access by vehicles into Bondi Road shopping centre, 17 per cent of respondents who were surveyed had driven into Bondi Road, which is a strip shopping centre with limited off-street parking. The Roads and Traffic Authority has dismissed the argument of traders on the basis that they did not provide the authority with financial data that indicated a fall in profits. First, the Roads and Traffic Authority had no right to ask for that data and, second, a number of traders 22 September 2009 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 17851 indicated a willingness to provide the data on a commercial-in-confidence basis. Those businesses are suffering a 10 per cent to 15 per cent reduction in trade on Saturday and Sunday afternoons and public holidays. They are small businesses, the ones most affected, and this is a critical period in their trading week. The Roads and Traffic Authority is dismissing the rights of those traders and this may result in the decline of this strip shopping centre. The only beneficiary in this instance will be Westfield at Bondi Junction. There is also some half-baked proposal in relation to parking alternatives, which assume availability for a residential parking scheme on the southern side. This survey shows that these parking spots are already 90 per cent occupied. These are all residential properties and there is no capacity for a residential parking scheme in that area to offset the loss of parking in Bondi Road. It will be a net loss for Bondi Road, a net loss to my community, and I call on the Roads and Traffic Authority to rethink this nonsense. TANILBA BAY FITNESS CENTRE PROPOSAL TILLEGRA DAM Mr CRAIG BAUMANN (Port Stephens) [1.14 p.m.]: Today I speak about two petitions currently circulating in my electorate, both very different but both sparking a great deal of interest in Port Stephens. The first is a petition put together by stage three students at St Philips Christian College, Salamander Bay. The students are currently studying the role of government and they decided to experience the State parliamentary system for themselves by presenting a petition on an issue of which the children are very supportive, that is, providing more services and things to do for young people in Port Stephens, particularly on the Tilligerry Peninsula where youth crime is a serious concern. The students decided a possible solution to the problems facing youth in Port Stephens was to establish a fitness centre on the site of a disused supermarket at Tanilba Bay. The proposal has some merit; the fitness centre could provide a range of activities for children, getting them healthy and active and giving them something to do rather then being caught up in vandalism and other antisocial activities. Earlier this month I visited St Philips Christian College at Salamander Bay where the students explained to me what the petition was all about and also told me what they had learnt about government so far. For years 5 and 6 students, their knowledge was impressive. This was really apparent when it came to question time. Some students clearly had a good grasp of the parliamentary process, with one asking specifically how many debates I had won in this House. Regardless of whether the school's petition, which already has hundreds of signatures, will gain any traction with the Government, it is certainly a fruitful learning exercise for the students, and I look forward to tabling the petition later this year. Petitions in Port Stephens have proven to be effective in forcing this State Government to wake up and listen. One example is the Myall River issue. I have raised the issue of the ailing river in this House many times as well as the subsequent pleas for help from the local community. In answers to questions on notice and during Question Time, as well as in local media reports, the Government has repeatedly refused to acknowledge any serious problems with the river, despite mass fish kills, murky brown water and drastically low salinity levels. In October last year I tabled a petition from the local community with more than 3,000 signatures calling on the Government to address the issue. Today, after continued lobbying, a public protest and a private meeting with the Minister, the Government has finally agreed to fund a study into how to fix the Myall River— an admission there is something wrong. This is an unbelievable win for the people of Tea Gardens and Hawks Nest. Now the people of Port Stephens are turning their attention to a fresh petition—fighting increased water charges to fund the Government's ludicrous Tillegra Dam project. Let me start by saying water storages in the Hunter region are currently at around 95 per cent capacity, and have been for some time. Even in the thick of the recent drought, one of the worst on record, Port Stephens still did not go on water restrictions. Yet this Labor Government, in all its wisdom, is planning to increase water charges for Hunter water ratepayers by more than $200 over the next four years to pay for the Tillegra Dam, and that is after pulling over $300 million out of Hunter Water surpluses in the last few years. The Tillegra Dam, at least where the Hunter is concerned, is not needed and certainly is not wanted. There is a huge question mark over exactly who is going to use the water storages of the Tillegra Dam. Is it the Hunter, the Central Coast or Sydney? Just last week, freedom of information documents revealed the Government has intentionally stopped referring to the Central Coast in comments and material about Tillegra 17852 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 22 September 2009 Dam, probably because the Government knows that will raise the ire of Hunter ratepayers, who are solely paying for a water supply for the Central Coast. Taxpayers in Port Stephens are already paying for the $2 billion desalination plant in Sydney that they will never use.