The Weird World of PHOEBE Scientists Are Finding That Saturn’S Strange Moon Isn’T Like the Other Satellites in the Solar System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Weird World of PHOEBE Scientists Are Finding That Saturn’S Strange Moon Isn’T Like the Other Satellites in the Solar System Planetary science The weird world of PHOEBE Scientists are finding that Saturn’s strange moon isn’t like the other satellites in the solar system. by Michael Carroll The interiors of the planets and the Planetary evolution solar system’s largest moons seemed seemed so straightforward. The pro- predictable, too: Due to a phenom- cess began, so the story went, with a enon called differentiation, heavy ele- disk of dust and gas called the solar ments within such a world sank to nebula. At the center of this rotating become a core while lighter ones rose disk, a dense clump condensed and to form a less dense crust. The smaller became a star — the Sun. It pulled in bodies, the ones with less mass and more material while its gravity grew. thus lower gravities like comet nuclei And just as an ice skater pulls her and smaller moons, carried out no arms in to spin faster, the disk’s rota- such settling and retained their well- tion speed began to increase. mixed interiors. Irregular clumps of gas and dust Scientists have long considered this that moved throughout the disk grew scenario their standard model. Then into asteroids, comet nuclei, and, ulti- came Saturn’s moon Phoebe. mately, planets. The rocky terrestrial planets — Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Surprisingly spherical Mars — established themselves near As natural satellites go, Phoebe, with a the Sun; the infant star’s heat burned diameter of 132 miles (213 kilometers), away many of their volatiles (elements falls below the midrange size of more and compounds with low boiling familiar moons like Iapetus or Mimas. points). Out where it was colder and This number is significant: Other sat- calmer, the bodies that would become ellites of similar sizes are not large Phoebe is an oddball moon of Saturn. Jupiter and Saturn pulled hydrogen enough for their weak gravities to pull Even though it’s small, it has a spherical and helium toward themselves from them into spherical shapes. They are shape and other planet-like characteristics. Scientists think volatiles breaking through the surrounding solar nebula. Farther probably cold clumps of rock and ice. the surface in Phoebe’s early history (as out still, Uranus and Neptune were Not so with Phoebe. The strange illustrated here) might be responsible for its rounded shape and craters. MICHAEL CARROLL able to hold onto water and eventually moon is round, leading scientists to FOR ASTRONOMY became the ice giants we see today. hypothesize that internal heat may © 2014 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This materialWWW.ASTRONOMY.COM may not be reproduced in any29 form without permission from the publisher. www.Astronomy.com The Nice model Onset of planetary migration Uranus Saturn 0° west longitude 90° west longitude Jupiter Neptune Disk of planetesimals Just before scattering starts GEORGE GRANTHAM BAIN COLLECTION (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS) OF (LIBRARY COLLECTION BAIN GRANTHAM GEORGE William Henry Pickering discovered Phoebe — Saturn’s ninth satellite — in 1899 after studying photographs he took in August 1898. 180° west longitude 270° west longitude most likely idea is that it got warmed up so Although Phoebe has bumpy, irregular topography, it has a fairly spherical shape. Scientists created this the [surface] ice could melt and flow. The digitally rendered model of Phoebe’s shape using imaging data taken when NASA’s Cassini spacecraft shape is globally relaxed. That’s the most flew by the saturnian satellite June 11, 2004. NASA/JPL/SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE important observation, and it comes from analyzing photos from many angles.” Saturn’s moon Hyperion has a low density, giving it weak surface gravity and high porosity. Scientists But smaller bodies hold heat for less would expect Phoebe to have a similar appearance due to its comparable size; Hyperion is about 220 miles have softened it early in its history. Phoebe’s to equilibrium; it had to be partially molten time. Where could Phoebe’s heat have come (360 kilometers) across its longest axis, while Phoebe is 132 miles (213km) wide. NASA/JPL/SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Just after scattering starts density is also higher than typical icy satur- for this to happen.” from? Bonnie Buratti of JPL suggests one nian satellites. Both of these pieces of infor- When a planet settles, or relaxes, into a scenario: “Phoebe may have formed very mation suggest that the tiny satellite may be spheroid, it reaches gravitational equilib- early in the solar system, when there were through the surface. According to Buratti, If Phoebe came from somewhere other differentiated with a dense rocky core, put- rium — its shape is stable under the influ- isotopes with a short life.” As radioactive “Their shape could also be due to mass wast- than the saturnian system, its early wan- ting it in the small club of planet-like bod- ence of its internal gravity. Phoebe seems isotopes decay, they lose radiation and/or ing where the sides have caved in. These derings reinforce the chinks in the standard ies. “It’s very different from the rest of the to have reached this point. If it has, says particles and release heat. For any given craters are cone-shaped — very strange.” model’s armor. Many researchers believed saturnian system,” says planetary scientist Castillo-Rogez, its core likely heated the amount of such radioactive material, the Castillo-Rogez agrees, adding, “The largest something might be awry with their theory Julie Castillo-Rogez of the Jet Propulsion outer layers to give the moon its shape. time it takes for half of the mass to decay is crater has practically lost her head!” long before they got a close look at Phoebe, Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California. “Phoebe should be like [saturnian satellite] called its half-life. Phoebe is not the only oddball in the says Hal Levison of the Southwest Research Researchers can learn about a solar sys- Hyperion, with lots of porosity throughout,” One isotope that may be responsible for saturnian system, and that’s what makes Institute in Boulder, Colorado. In its forma- tem object’s interior and thus if it is differen- she adds. “The fact that it has a high density Phoebe’s heat specifically, Buratti says, is its study so fascinating to researchers like tive years, he explains, “the Sun shed angu- tiated using spacecraft flybys. Such a world — three times greater than Hyperion — aluminum-26, which has a half-life of about Castillo-Rogez. “You have such a variety of lar momentum by creating a disk of is much more massive than any probe, so tells us that something happened to cause 720,000 years. “It produces a lot of heat in a bodies, and they probably don’t come from material. Grains of ice and rock were float- when a craft passes by a planetary body, the the collapse of the porous [outer layers]. The few thousand years,” she says. “That heat the same place,” she says. “We think the ing around in the disk.” Those particles 200 million years later massive object’s gravity bends its course. may have been responsible for hydrother- inner satellites formed from the rings of slowly settled, stuck together, and thus Flight engineers can chart this path. If the mal activity and other processes. Small Saturn. Hyperion may be a fragment of grew into larger objects: the solar system’s pass is close enough to the planet or moon bodies with very rich chemistry were heated another [inner] body or a captured object. four terrestrial planets, Uranus, Neptune, or if there are enough passes, scientists can by these isotopes with short half-lives. [The Iapetus may be original to the system, but and what scientists think are the cores of determine the larger object’s internal struc- objects] need to form very early for that its density is very weird. Then you have Jupiter and Saturn. But, in the standard ture. While researchers have used data from heat to be available. Formation within the Phoebe and other outer satellites that are model, those bodies formed where they NASA’s Cassini spacecraft to employ this first 3 million years [of the solar system] probably captured.” currently orbit. The problem, says Levison, method to learn about Enceladus and Titan, gives us a way to relax Phoebe’s shape.” Phoebe’s orbit provides a hint that it is that this depiction simply cannot be true. the probe did not fly close enough to Phoebe winged its way in from afar: The moon cir- ET AL. GOMES, AFTER KELLY, ROEN : to permit such estimates, Castillo-Rogez From outside or within? cles Saturn in a retrograde course, opposite Was upheaval needed? That relaxed surface also affects the shape of The standard model of planet formation says. The calculation has “a huge error bar,” the direction that the saturnian system natu- ASTRONOMY she continues. “But the one thing that is craters. Phoebe’s crater rims seem to be com- rally rotates. Its orbit is also eccentric — not faces two major problems. The first is what NASA/JPL/SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE SCIENCE NASA/JPL/SPACE The Nice model is scientists’ leading theory robust is that the shape of Phoebe is close The crater at top center displays alternating layers posed of only ice in certain places, and the circular — and inclined at an extreme angle. Levison calls the meter barrier. “Imagine of the early solar system’s evolution. It main- of bright and dark material. Researchers think its craters themselves are oddly shaped. “If you Phoebe travels far from its parent world, these floating dust grains,” he says. “These tains that around 4 billion years ago, Jupiter’s Michael Carroll, a science writer and astronom- appearance might be the result of subsurface light- look at the craters on Phoebe, they don’t look circling the planet in a great loop some 16 stick together and grow like dust bunnies.
Recommended publications
  • Water Masers in the Saturnian System
    A&A 494, L1–L4 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811186 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor Water masers in the Saturnian system S. V. Pogrebenko1,L.I.Gurvits1, M. Elitzur2,C.B.Cosmovici3,I.M.Avruch1,4, S. Montebugnoli5 , E. Salerno5, S. Pluchino3,5, G. Maccaferri5, A. Mujunen6, J. Ritakari6, J. Wagner6,G.Molera6, and M. Uunila6 1 Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe, PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands e-mail: [pogrebenko;lgurvits]@jive.nl 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, 600 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40506-0055, USA e-mail: [email protected] 3 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) – Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (IFSI), via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 4 Science & Technology BV, PO 608 2600 AP Delft, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 5 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) – Istituto di Radioastronomia (IRA) – Stazione Radioastronomica di Medicina, via Fiorentina 3508/B, 40059 Medicina (BO), Italy e-mail: [s.montebugnoli;e.salerno;g.maccaferri]@ira.inaf.it; [email protected] 6 Helsinki University of Technology TKK, Metsähovi Radio Observatory, 02540 Kylmälä, Finland e-mail: [amn;jr;jwagner;gofrito;minttu]@kurp.hut.fi Received 18 October 2008 / Accepted 4 December 2008 ABSTRACT Context. The presence of water has long been seen as a key condition for life in planetary environments. The Cassini spacecraft discovered water vapour in the Saturnian system by detecting absorption of UV emission from a background star. Investigating other possible manifestations of water is essential, one of which, provided physical conditions are suitable, is maser emission.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deeper Look at the Colors of the Saturnian Irregular Satellites Arxiv
    A deeper look at the colors of the Saturnian irregular satellites Tommy Grav Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, MS51, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA02138 and Instiute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Dr., Honolulu, HI86822 [email protected] James Bauer Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Dr., MS183-501, Pasadena, CA91109 [email protected] September 13, 2018 arXiv:astro-ph/0611590v2 8 Mar 2007 Manuscript: 36 pages, with 11 figures and 5 tables. 1 Proposed running head: Colors of Saturnian irregular satellites Corresponding author: Tommy Grav MS51, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA02138 USA Phone: (617) 384-7689 Fax: (617) 495-7093 Email: [email protected] 2 Abstract We have performed broadband color photometry of the twelve brightest irregular satellites of Saturn with the goal of understanding their surface composition, as well as their physical relationship. We find that the satellites have a wide variety of different surface colors, from the negative spectral slopes of the two retrograde satellites S IX Phoebe (S0 = −2:5 ± 0:4) and S XXV Mundilfari (S0 = −5:0 ± 1:9) to the fairly red slope of S XXII Ijiraq (S0 = 19:5 ± 0:9). We further find that there exist a correlation between dynamical families and spectral slope, with the prograde clusters, the Gallic and Inuit, showing tight clustering in colors among most of their members. The retrograde objects are dynamically and physically more dispersed, but some internal structure is apparent. Keywords: Irregular satellites; Photometry, Satellites, Surfaces; Saturn, Satellites. 3 1 Introduction The satellites of Saturn can be divided into two distinct groups, the regular and irregular, based on their orbital characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Secular Architecture of the Solar System I: the Giant Planets
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. secular c ESO 2018 May 29, 2018 Constructing the secular architecture of the solar system I: The giant planets A. Morbidelli1, R. Brasser1, K. Tsiganis2, R. Gomes3, and H. F. Levison4 1 Dep. Cassiopee, University of Nice - Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; Nice, France 2 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Observat´orio Nacional; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil 4 Southwest Research Institute; Boulder, CO, USA submitted: 13 July 2009; accepted: 31 August 2009 ABSTRACT Using numerical simulations, we show that smooth migration of the giant planets through a planetesimal disk leads to an orbital architecture that is inconsistent with the current one: the resulting eccentricities and inclinations of their orbits are too small. The crossing of mutual mean motion resonances by the planets would excite their orbital eccentricities but not their orbital inclinations. Moreover, the amplitudes of the eigenmodes characterising the current secular evolution of the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn would not be reproduced correctly; only one eigenmode is excited by resonance-crossing. We show that, at the very least, encounters between Saturn and one of the ice giants (Uranus or Neptune) need to have occurred, in order to reproduce the current secular properties of the giant planets, in particular the amplitude of the two strongest eigenmodes in the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn. Key words. Solar System: formation 1. Introduction Snellgrove (2001). The top panel shows the evolution of the semi major axes, where Saturn’ semi-major axis is depicted The formation and evolution of the solar system is a longstand- by the upper curve and that of Jupiter is the lower trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Neptunian Objects a Brief History, Dynamical Structure, and Characteristics of Its Inhabitants
    Trans-Neptunian Objects A Brief history, Dynamical Structure, and Characteristics of its Inhabitants John Stansberry Space Telescope Science Institute IAC Winter School 2016 IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 1 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1930: Pluto discovered – Photographic survey for Planet X • Directed by Percival Lowell (Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona) • Efforts from 1905 – 1929 were fruitless • discovered by Clyde Tombaugh, Feb. 1930 (33 cm refractor) – Survey continued into 1943 • Kuiper, or Edgeworth-Kuiper, Belt? – 1950’s: Pluto represented (K.E.), or had scattered (G.K.) a primordial, population of small bodies – thus KBOs or EKBOs – J. Fernandez (1980, MNRAS 192) did pretty clearly predict something similar to the trans-Neptunian belt of objects – Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), trans-Neptunian region best? – See http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/kb/gerard.html IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 2 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1978: Pluto’s moon, Charon, discovered – Photographic astrometry survey • 61” (155 cm) reflector • James Christy (Naval Observatory, Flagstaff) – Technologically, discovery was possible decades earlier • Saturation of Pluto images masked the presence of Charon • 1988: Discovery of Pluto’s atmosphere – Stellar occultation • Kuiper airborne observatory (KAO: 90 cm) + 7 sites • Measured atmospheric refractivity vs. height • Spectroscopy suggested N2 would dominate P(z), T(z) • 1992: Pluto’s orbit explained • Outward migration by Neptune results in capture into 3:2 resonance • Pluto’s inclination implies Neptune migrated outward ~5 AU IAC Winter School 2016 -- Kuiper Belt Overview -- J. Stansberry 3 The Solar System beyond Neptune: History • 1992: Discovery of 2nd TNO • 1976 – 92: Multiple dedicated surveys for small (mV > 20) TNOs • Fall 1992: Jewitt and Luu discover 1992 QB1 – Orbit confirmed as ~circular, trans-Neptunian in 1993 • 1993 – 4: 5 more TNOs discovered • c.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Rings and Satellites Around the Exoplanet Corot-9B Using Spitzer Photometry A
    Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry A. Lecavelier Etangs, G. Hebrard, S. Blandin, J. Cassier, H. J. Deeg, A. S. Bonomo, F. Bouchy, J. -m. Desert, D. Ehrenreich, M. Deleuil, et al. To cite this version: A. Lecavelier Etangs, G. Hebrard, S. Blandin, J. Cassier, H. J. Deeg, et al.. Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry. Astronomy and Astrophysics - A&A, EDP Sciences, 2017, 603, pp.A115. 10.1051/0004-6361/201730554. hal-01678524 HAL Id: hal-01678524 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01678524 Submitted on 16 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A&A 603, A115 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730554 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry A. Lecavelier des Etangs1, G. Hébrard1; 2, S. Blandin1, J. Cassier1, H. J. Deeg3; 4, A. S. Bonomo5, F. Bouchy6, J.-M. Désert7, D. Ehrenreich6, M. Deleuil8, R. F. Díaz9; 10, C. Moutou11, and A. Vidal-Madjar1 1 Institut d’astrophysique de Paris, CNRS, UMR 7095 & Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 6, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS/OAMP, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Universidad de La Laguna, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassini Observations of Saturn's Irregular Moons
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 12, EPSC2018-103-1, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2018 Cassini Observations of Saturn's Irregular Moons Tilmann Denk (1) and Stefano Mottola (2) (1) Freie Universität Berlin, Germany ([email protected]), (2) DLR Berlin, Germany 1. Introduction two prograde irregulars are slower than ~13 h, while the periods of all but two retrogrades are faster than With the ISS-NAC camera of the Cassini spacecraft, ~13 h. The fastest period (Hati) is much slower than we obtained photometric lightcurves of 25 irregular the disruption rotation barrier for asteroids (~2.3 h), moons of Saturn. The goal was to derive basic phys- indicating that Saturn's irregulars may be rubble piles ical properties of these objects (like rotational periods, of rather low densities, possibly as low as of comets. shapes, pole-axis orientations, possible global color variations, ...) and to get hints on their formation and Table: Rotational periods of 25 Saturnian irregulars evolution. Our campaign marks the first utilization of an interplanetary probe for a systematic photometric Moon Approx. size Rotational period survey of irregular moons. name [km] [h] Hati 5 5.45 ± 0.04 The irregular moons are a class of objects that is very Mundilfari 7 6.74 ± 0.08 distinct from the inner moons of Saturn. Not only are Loge 5 6.9 ± 0.1 ? they more numerous (38 versus 24), but also occupy Skoll 5 7.26 ± 0.09 (?) a much larger volume within the Hill sphere of Suttungr 7 7.67 ± 0.02 Saturn.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Solar System
    This graphic of the solar system was made using real images of the planets and comet Hale-Bopp. It is not to scale! To show a scale model of the solar system with the Sun being 1cm would require about 64 meters of paper! Image credit: Maggie Mosetti, NASA This book was produced to commemorate the Year of the Solar System (2011-2013, a martian year), initiated by NASA. See http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/yss. Many images and captions have been adapted from NASA’s “From Earth to the Solar System” (FETTSS) image collection. See http://fettss.arc.nasa.gov/. Additional imagery and captions compiled by Deborah Scherrer, Stanford University, California, USA. Special thanks to the people of Suntrek (www.suntrek.org,) who helped with the final editing and allowed me to use Alphonse Sterling’s awesome photograph of a solar eclipse! Cover Images: Solar System: NASA/JPL; YSS logo: NASA; Sun: Venus Transit from NASA SDO/AIA © 2013-2020 Stanford University; permission given to use for educational and non-commericial purposes. Table of Contents Why Is the Sun Green and Mars Blue? ............................................................................... 4 Our Sun – Source of Life ..................................................................................................... 5 Solar Activity ................................................................................................................... 6 Space Weather ................................................................................................................. 9 Mercury
    [Show full text]
  • Athena ΑΘΗΝΑ Zeus ΖΕΥΣ Poseidon ΠΟΣΕΙΔΩΝ Hades ΑΙΔΗΣ
    gods ΑΠΟΛΛΩΝ ΑΡΤΕΜΙΣ ΑΘΗΝΑ ΔΙΟΝΥΣΟΣ Athena Greek name Apollo Artemis Minerva Roman name Dionysus Diana Bacchus The god of music, poetry, The goddess of nature The goddess of wisdom, The god of wine and art, and of the sun and the hunt the crafts, and military strategy and of the theater Olympian Son of Zeus by Semele ΕΡΜΗΣ gods Twin children ΗΦΑΙΣΤΟΣ Hermes of Zeus by Zeus swallowed his first Mercury Leto, born wife, Metis, and as a on Delos result Athena was born ΑΡΗΣ Hephaestos The messenger of the gods, full-grown from Vulcan and the god of boundaries Son of Zeus the head of Zeus. Ares by Maia, a Mars The god of the forge who must spend daughter The god and of artisans part of each year in of Atlas of war Persephone the underworld as the consort of Hades ΑΙΔΗΣ ΖΕΥΣ ΕΣΤΙΑ ΔΗΜΗΤΗΡ Zeus ΗΡΑ ΠΟΣΕΙΔΩΝ Hades Jupiter Hera Poseidon Hestia Pluto Demeter The king of the gods, Juno Vesta Ceres Neptune The goddess of The god of the the god of the sky The goddess The god of the sea, the hearth, underworld The goddess of and of thunder of women “The Earth-shaker” household, the harvest and marriage and state ΑΦΡΟΔΙΤΗ Hekate The goddess Aphrodite First-generation Second- generation of magic Venus ΡΕΑ Titans ΚΡΟΝΟΣ Titans The goddess of MagnaRhea Mater Astraeus love and beauty Mnemosyne Kronos Saturn Deucalion Pallas & Perses Pyrrha Kronos cut off the genitals Crius of his father Uranus and threw them into the sea, and Asteria Aphrodite arose from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems
    Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Alessandro Morbidelli Abstract Planetary systems can evolve dynamically even after the full growth of the planets themselves. There is actually circumstantial evidence that most plane- tary systems become unstable after the disappearance of gas from the protoplanetary disk. These instabilities can be due to the original system being too crowded and too closely packed or to external perturbations such as tides, planetesimal scattering, or torques from distant stellar companions. The Solar System was not exceptional in this sense. In its inner part, a crowded system of planetary embryos became un- stable, leading to a series of mutual impacts that built the terrestrial planets on a timescale of ∼ 100My. In its outer part, the giant planets became temporarily unsta- ble and their orbital configuration expanded under the effect of mutual encounters. A planet might have been ejected in this phase. Thus, the orbital distributions of planetary systems that we observe today, both solar and extrasolar ones, can be dif- ferent from the those emerging from the formation process and it is important to consider possible long-term evolutionary effects to connect the two. Introduction This chapter concerns the dynamical evolution of planetary systems after the re- moval of gas from the proto-planetary disk. Most massive planets are expected to form within the lifetime of the gas component of protoplanetary disks (see chapters by D’Angelo and Lissauer for the giant planets and by Schlichting for Super-Earths) and, while they form, they are expected to evolve dynamically due to gravitational interactions with the gas (see chapter by Nelson on planet migration).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on the Origin of the Pluto System Robin M. Canup Southwest Research Institute Kaitlin M. Kratter University of Arizona Marc Ne
    On the Origin of the Pluto System Robin M. Canup Southwest Research Institute Kaitlin M. Kratter University of Arizona Marc Neveu NASA Goddard Space Flight Center / University of Maryland The goal of this chapter is to review hypotheses for the origin of the Pluto system in light of observational constraints that have been considerably refined over the 85-year interval between the discovery of Pluto and its exploration by spacecraft. We focus on the giant impact hypothesis currently understood as the likeliest origin for the Pluto-Charon binary, and devote particular attention to new models of planet formation and migration in the outer Solar System. We discuss the origins conundrum posed by the system’s four small moons. We also elaborate on implications of these scenarios for the dynamical environment of the early transneptunian disk, the likelihood of finding a Pluto collisional family, and the origin of other binary systems in the Kuiper belt. Finally, we highlight outstanding open issues regarding the origin of the Pluto system and suggest areas of future progress. 1. INTRODUCTION For six decades following its discovery, Pluto was the only known Sun-orbiting world in the dynamical vicinity of Neptune. An early origin concept postulated that Neptune originally had two large moons – Pluto and Neptune’s current moon, Triton – and that a dynamical event had both reversed the sense of Triton’s orbit relative to Neptune’s rotation and ejected Pluto onto its current heliocentric orbit (Lyttleton, 1936). This scenario remained in contention following the discovery of Charon, as it was then established that Pluto’s mass was similar to that of a large giant planet moon (Christy and Harrington, 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Evection Resonance in Saturn's Coorbital Moons Dr
    Evection resonance in Saturn's coorbital moons Dr. Cristian Giuppone1, Lic Ximena Saad Olivera2, Dr. Fernando Roig2 (1) Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, OAC - IATE, Córdoba, Ar (2) Observatorio Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil OPS III - Diversis Mundi - Santiago - Chile Evection resonance in Saturn's coorbital moons MOTIVATION: recent studies in Jovian planets links the evection resonance and the architecture and evolution of their satellites. Evection resonance in Saturn's coorbital moons MOTIVATION: recent studies in Jovian planets links the evection resonance and the architecture and evolution of their satellites. GOAL: understand the evection resonance in the frame of coorbital motion of Satellites, through numerical evidence of its importance. Evection resonance ● The evection resonance is produced when the orbit pericenter of a satellite (ϖ) precess with the same period that the Sun movement as a perturber (λO) (Brouwer and Clemence, 1961) The evection angle → Ψ=λO – ϖ Satellite Sun Saturn ψ = 0° Evection resonance ● The evection resonance is produced when the orbit pericenter of a satellite (ϖ) precess with the same period that the Sun movement as a perturber (λO) (Brouwer and Clemence, 1961) The evection angle → Ψ=λO – ϖ Satellite Sun Saturn ψ = 0° Evection resonance ● Interior resonance: ● Produced by the oblateness of the planet. ● -3 Located at a ~ 10 RP (a~10 au), and several armonics are present. ● Importance: tides produce outward migration of inner moons. The moons can cross the resonance and may change substantially their orbital elements (e.g. Nesvorny et al 2003, Cuk et al. 2016) Evection resonance ● Interior resonance: ● Produced by the oblateness of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the Asteroid Belt for a Violent Past Evolution of Jupiter's Orbit
    Evidence from the asteroid belt for a violent past evolution of Jupiter's orbit Alessandro Morbidelli Departement Cassiop´ee: Universite de Nice - Sophia Antipolis, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, CNRS 4, 06304 Nice, France Ramon Brasser Departement Cassiop´ee: Universite de Nice - Sophia Antipolis, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, CNRS 4, 06304 Nice, France Rodney Gomes Observatrio Nacional, Rua General Jos Cristino 77, CEP 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Harold F. Levison Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, USA and Kleomenis Tsiganis Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54 124 Thessaloniki, Greece Received by AJ, on may 24, 2010; accepted by AJ, on Sept 8, 2010 arXiv:1009.1521v1 [astro-ph.EP] 8 Sep 2010 –2– ABSTRACT We use the current orbital structure of large (> 50 km) asteroids in the main as- teroid belt to constrain the evolution of the giant planets when they migrated from their primordial orbits to their current ones. Minton & Malhotra (2009) showed that the orbital distribution of large asteroids in the main belt can be reproduced by an exponentially-decaying migration of the giant planets on a time scale of τ ∼ 0.5 My. However, self-consistent numerical simulations show that the planetesimal-driven mi- gration of the giant planets is inconsistent with an exponential change in their semi major axes on such a short time scale (Hahn & Malhotra, 1999). In fact, the typical time scale is τ ≥ 5 My. When giant planet migration on this time scale is appliedto the asteroid belt, the resulting orbital distribution is incompatible with the observed one.
    [Show full text]