DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Figures and Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Figures and Tables Supplementary Figures and Tables Figure S1. The flowchart regarding the classification of the samples. The detailed operating procedures and information about classification of samples. Figure S2. The results of the Fisher Ratio. Bar plot presented the interval of genes‘ fisher ratio and the number of genes in each interval. Figure S3. Screen plot of 300 representative genes. Scree plot was drawn to show the correlation between variance and the number of main components. Figure S4. The bubble diagram of functional enrichment. The enriched Gene Ontology for subtype 1, subtype 2 and subtype 3. Count means the number of genes enriched in a certain annotation. Figure S5. The heatplot for the molecular subtypes, pathologic stage and TNM staging. Tnm_m, tnm_n and tnm_t were the TNM staging. Table S1. The detailed information for the 34 DEGs. Gene Discription Reference p-Value Fold Change Symbol stage-specific differentially 3.368509 × GABRD expressed in hepatocellular [38] 34.8256 10−62 carcinoma 1.338193 × ANGPTL6 highly expressed in liver cancer [43] 0.1879 10−23 Required for mitochondrial 2.034419 × MSTO1 fusion and mitochondrial GeneCards 5.1055 10−94 network formation A potential therapeutic target of 3.463284 × EBF2 [40] 56.8254 HCC 10−49 9.070282 × GBA inhibit liver cancer [45] 4.0856 10−83 a valuable biomarker for the 2.854162 × CLEC4M prognosis of the patients with [30] 0.0273 10−14 HCC involved in tumor progression of 4.156083 × MIR3658 [52] 5.0915 bladder cancer 10−68 a therapeutic target for gastric 1.874503 × GPAA1 [51] 4.0789 cancer 10−70 highly expressed and associated 6.909608 × CACYBP [33] 3.3634 with poor prognosis in HCC 10−69 significant association with 3.449638 × SFTA1P [32] 123.5817 overall survival in HCC patients 10−48 linked with impaired liver 5.819188 × CXCL14 [49] 0.1507 function 10−20 represented a potential research 9.562192 × CKS1B target for therapeutics of [46] 3.7726 10−68 retinoblastoma 1.226416 × APLN played an oncogenic role in HCC [35] 24.4214 10−42 The gene is overexpressed in 8.404593 × KRTCAP2 GeneCards 3.4930 Liver 10−88 serve as a biomarker for 1.897959 × ESM1 diagnosing and monitoring renal [50] 29.5066 10−37 cell carcinoma The Human 2.562632 × TBCE Low tissue specificity 3.3832 Protein Atlas 10−92 a signature gene highly associated 9.306855 × CLEC1B [47] 0.0368 with tumor progression 10−17 played a crucial role in the 8.340677 × PPOX [41] 3.5038 development of HCC 10−97 a potential noninvasive 7.580294 × CDH13 [36] 7.8091 biomarker of HCC 10−71 controls survival and 1.135516 × NTF3 differentiation of mammalian GeneCards 0.1380 10−22 neurons related to pathway Innate 9.410057 × C1orf35 GeneCards 3.9379 Immune System 10−86 correlated with overall survival in 5.074940 × C8orf33 [37] 3.7787 HCC patients 10−74 involved in post-transcriptional 2.573851 × MIR4793 regulation of gene expression in GeneCards 17.7375 10−44 multicellular organisms links to tumorigenesis and the 1.753135 × HIGD1B progression of pituitary GeneCards 13.1410 10−79 adenomas 1.733118 × BLOC1S3 induce hepatocyte apoptosis [44] 3.1598 10−74 LOC1053696 an RNA Gene, affiliated with the 1.855580 × GeneCards 4.5705 32 lncRNA class 10−69 Prognostic marker in liver cancer The Human 9.020337 × COL15A1 21.5720 (favourable) Protein Atlas 10−41 The Human 2.201642 × CRIP3 Cancer enhanced (liver cancer) 7.0812 Protein Atlas 10−35 promoted the tumor igenicity and 3.849815 × SMYD3 intrahepatic metastasis of HCC [39] 4.5849 10−46 cell played important role during 7.968983 × DDX11-AS1 [34] 12.1320 HCC oncogenesis 10−52 downregulated in HCC and could 2.130738 × CYP2C8 be a potential prognostic [31] 0.2245 10−20 biomarker the major microtubule-organizing 6.352548 × CEP72 GeneCards 4.2004 center in animal cells 10−48 an RNA Gene, and is affiliated 5.731509 × HCG25 GeneCards 5.1442 with the lncRNA class 10−59 expressed higher in HCC cells 1.191638 × FAM83H [48] 4.2419 compared to normal liver 10−63 Table S2. Function enrichment analysis of the 34 DEGs. Function p-Value Genes Receptor regulator activity 1.592 × 10−3 NTF3,CXCL14 Cell development 1.927 × 10−3 NTF3, TBCE, SMYD3 Positive regulation of response to external 2.429 × 10−3 NTF3, CDH13 stimulus NTF3,GBA,ANGPTL6, Multicellular organismal process 2.607 × 10−3 TBCE, CDH13 Muscle structure development 3.298 × 10−3 CXCL14, SMYD3 Viral genome replication 5.250 × 10−3 CLEC4M Membrane lipid catabolic process 5.250 × 10−3 GBA Cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulus 5.250 × 10−3 SMYD3 Modulation by virus of host morphology or 5.250 × 10−3 CLEC4M physiology Protein localization to microtubule organizing 5.250 × 10−3 CEP72 center Cellular response to dexamethasone stimulus 5.250 × 10−3 SMYD3 Skin morphogenesis 5.250 × 10−3 GBA Maintenance of protein localization in 5.250 × 10−3 GPAA1 endoplasmic reticulum Negative regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine 5.250 × 10−3 NTF3 phosphorylation Regulation of locomotion 5.405 × 10−3 NTF3, CDH13 regulation of the force of heart contraction 6.122 × 10−3 APLN Adhesion of symbiont to host 6.122 × 10−3 CLEC4M Muscle atrophy 6.122 × 10−3 TBCE Intracellular signal transduction 6.400 × 10−3 CLEC4M,NTF3, GBA NTF3,COL15A1,CLEC1B, Anatomical structure development 6.891 × 10−3 CXCL14 Pigment cell differentiation 6.993 × 10−3 BLOC1S3 Aromatase activity 6.993 × 10−3 CYP2C8 Oxygen binding 6.993 × 10−3 CYP2C8 GABA receptor activity 6.993 × 10−3 GABRD Response to testosterone 6.993 × 10−3 GBA Cell activation 7.107 × 10−3 CLEC1B, BLOC1S3 Cadherin binding 7.864 × 10−3 CDH13 Axo-dendritic transport 7.864 × 10−3 BLOC1S3 Phosphate-containing compound metabolic 8.058 × 10−3 NTF3,GBA,GPAA1 process Regulation of cyclin-dependent protein 8.734 × 10−3 CKS1B serine/threonine kinase activity Positive regulation of receptor-mediated 8.734 × 10−3 NTF3 endocytosis Extracellular matrix structural constituent 8.734 × 10−3 COL15A1 Endocrine hormone secretion 8.734 × 10−3 APLN FAM83H,CLEC1B, Developmental process 8.799 × 10−3 EBF2,BLOC1S3 Catalytic activity, acting on a protein 9.024 × 10−3 SMYD3,GPAA1,CKS1B Positive regulation of transport 9.557 × 10−3 NTF3, APLN Chemokine receptor binding 9.604 × 10−3 CXCL14 Porphyrin-containing compound metabolic 9.604 × 10−3 PPOX process Table S3. Pathway enrichment analysis of the 34 DEGs. Pathway P-Value Genes C-type lectin receptor signaling pathway 3.9220 × 10−3 CLEC4M, CLEC1B Other glycan degradation 1.6532 × 10−2 GBA Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor 2.2556 × 10−2 GPAA1 biosynthesis Linoleic acid metabolism 2.5981 × 10−2 CYP2C8 Nicotine addiction 3.5343 × 10−2 GABRD Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction 3.5760 × 10−2 GABRD, APLN CYP2C8,GBA, PPOX, Metabolic pathways 3.6029 × 10−2 GPAA1 Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism 3.7036 × 10−2 PPOX Sphingolipid metabolism 4.1255 × 10−2 GBA Arachidonic acid metabolism 5.4635 × 10−2 CYP2C8 Retinol metabolism 5.7952 × 10−2 CYP2C8 Drug metabolism - cytochrome P450 6.2082 × 10−2 CYP2C8 Chemical carcinogenesis 7.0290 × 10−2 CYP2C8 GABAergic synapse 7.5993 × 10−2 GABRD Protein digestion and absorption 7.6805 × 10−2 COL15A1 Morphine addiction 7.7617 × 10−2 GABRD Small cell lung cancer 7.9237 × 10−2 CKS1B Viral protein interaction with cytokine and 8.4888 × 10−2 CXCL14 cytokine receptor Serotonergic synapse 9.6883 × 10−2 CYP2C8 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Temperature-Dependent Retention of Introns in GPI8 Transcripts Contributes to a Drooping and Fragile Shoot Phenotype in Rice
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article The Temperature-Dependent Retention of Introns in GPI8 Transcripts Contributes to a Drooping and Fragile Shoot Phenotype in Rice Bo Zhao 1,2, Yongyan Tang 1,2, Baocai Zhang 3, Pingzhi Wu 1, Meiru Li 1, Xinlan Xu 1, Guojiang Wu 1, Huawu Jiang 1 and Yaping Chen 1,* 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (X.X.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (H.J.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-20-37252750 Received: 14 November 2019; Accepted: 30 December 2019; Published: 31 December 2019 Abstract: Attachment of glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPIs) to the C-termini of proteins is one of the most common posttranslational modifications in eukaryotic cells. GPI8/PIG-K is the catalytic subunit of the GPI transamidase complex catalyzing the transfer en bloc GPI to proteins. In this study, a T-DNA insertional mutant of rice with temperature-dependent drooping and fragile (df ) shoots phenotype was isolated. The insertion site of the T-DNA fragment was 879 bp downstream of the stop codon of the OsGPI8 gene, which caused introns retention in the gene transcripts, especially at higher temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • ESM1 As a Marker of Macrotrabecular-Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0859 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. ESM1 as a marker of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma. Julien Calderaro1,2,3, Léa Meunier4, Cong Trung Nguyen2,3, Marouane Boubaya5, Stefano Caruso4, Alain Luciani2,3,6, Giuliana Amaddeo2,3,7, Hélène Regnault7, Jean-Charles Nault4,8,9 , Justine Cohen1,2,Frédéric Oberti10, Sophie Michalak11, Mohamed Bouattour12, Valérie Vilgrain18, Georges Philippe Pageaux14, Jeanne Ramos15, Nathalie Barget16, Boris Guiu17, Valérie Paradis13, Christophe Aubé19, Alexis Laurent20, Jean-Michel Pawlotsky2,3,22, Nathalie Ganne-Carrié4,8,9, Jessica Zucman-Rossi4,22,23, Olivier Seror24, Marianne Ziol4,9,25. 1. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département Pathologie, CHU Henri Mondor, F-94000 Créteil, France. 2. Université Paris-Est Créteil, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France. 3. Inserm, U955, Team 18, Créteil, France. 4. INSERM UMR-1162, génomique fonctionnelle des tumeurs solides, 75010, Paris, France 5. Unité de Recherche Clinique, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Avicenne, Bobigny, France. 6. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Radiologie, CHU Henri Mondor, F-94000 Créteil, France 7. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Hépatologie, CHU Henri Mondor, F-94000 Créteil, France. 8. Service d’Hépatologie, Groupe hospitalier Paris-Seine-Saint Denis, Hôpital Jean Verdier, AP-HP, 93143 Bondy, France, 9. Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Bobigny, France 10. Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, France. 11. Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, France. 12. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d’Oncologie Digestive, Hôpital Universitaire Beaujon, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Influences on Endothelial Gene Expression
    ENDOTHELIAL CELL GENE EXPRESSION John Matthew Jeff Herbert Supervisors: Prof. Roy Bicknell and Dr. Victoria Heath PhD thesis University of Birmingham August 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Tumour angiogenesis is a vital process in the pathology of tumour development and metastasis. Targeting markers of tumour endothelium provide a means of targeted destruction of a tumours oxygen and nutrient supply via destruction of tumour vasculature, which in turn ultimately leads to beneficial consequences to patients. Although current anti -angiogenic and vascular targeting strategies help patients, more potently in combination with chemo therapy, there is still a need for more tumour endothelial marker discoveries as current treatments have cardiovascular and other side effects. For the first time, the analyses of in-vivo biotinylation of an embryonic system is performed to obtain putative vascular targets. Also for the first time, deep sequencing is applied to freshly isolated tumour and normal endothelial cells from lung, colon and bladder tissues for the identification of pan-vascular-targets. Integration of the proteomic, deep sequencing, public cDNA libraries and microarrays, delivers 5,892 putative vascular targets to the science community.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Genome Analysis of Somatic P53 Mutant Osteosarcomas Identifies Ets2-Dependent Regulation of Small Nucleolar Rnas by Mutant P53 Protein
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Integrative genome analysis of somatic p53 mutant osteosarcomas identifies Ets2-dependent regulation of small nucleolar RNAs by mutant p53 protein Rasoul Pourebrahim,1 Yun Zhang,1 Bin Liu,1 Ruli Gao,1 Shunbin Xiong,1 Patrick P. Lin,2 Mark J. McArthur,3 Michael C. Ostrowski,4 and Guillermina Lozano1 1Department of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 2Department of Orthopedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 3Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 4Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. Many mutant p53 proteins exert oncogenic gain-of- function (GOF) properties that contribute to metastasis, but the mechanisms mediating these functions remain poorly defined in vivo. To elucidate how mutant p53 GOF drives metastasis, we developed a traceable somatic os- teosarcoma mouse model that is initiated with either a single p53 mutation (p53R172H) or p53 loss in osteoblasts. Our study confirmed that p53 mutant mice developed osteosarcomas with increased metastasis as compared with p53-null mice. Comprehensive transcriptome RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of 16 tumors identified a cluster of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) that are highly up-regulated in p53 mutant tumors. Regulatory element analysis of these deregulated snoRNA genes identified strong enrichment of a common Ets2 transcription factor-binding site. Homozygous deletion of Ets2 in p53 mutant mice resulted in strong down-regulation of snoRNAs and reversed the prometastatic phenotype of mutant p53 but had no effect on osteosarcoma development, which remained 100% penetrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Genetic Architecture of Gene Regulation in Whole Blood
    Mapping the Genetic Architecture of Gene Regulation in Whole Blood Katharina Schramm1,2., Carola Marzi3,4,5., Claudia Schurmann6., Maren Carstensen7,8., Eva Reinmaa9,10, Reiner Biffar11, Gertrud Eckstein1, Christian Gieger12, Hans-Jo¨ rgen Grabe13, Georg Homuth6, Gabriele Kastenmu¨ ller14, Reedik Ma¨gi10, Andres Metspalu9,10, Evelin Mihailov10,15, Annette Peters2, Astrid Petersmann16, Michael Roden7,8,17, Konstantin Strauch12,18, Karsten Suhre14,19, Alexander Teumer6,UweVo¨ lker6, Henry Vo¨ lzke20, Rui Wang-Sattler3,4, Melanie Waldenberger3,4, Thomas Meitinger1,2,21, Thomas Illig22, Christian Herder7,8., Harald Grallert3,4,5., Holger Prokisch1,2*. 1 Institute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany, 2 Institute of Human Genetics, Technical University Munich, Mu¨nchen, Germany, 3 Research Unit of Molecular Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany, 4 Institute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany, 5 German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany, 6 Interfaculty Institute for Genetics and Functional Genomics, Department of Functional Genomics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 7 Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Du¨sseldorf, Du¨sseldorf, Germany, 8 German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.),
    [Show full text]
  • Alterations of Genetic Variants and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Tamoxifen in the Breast Cancer Cell Line
    Alterations of Genetic Variants and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Tamoxifen in the Breast Cancer Cell Line Mahnaz Nezamivand-Chegini Shiraz University Hamed Kharrati-Koopaee Shiraz University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-6919 seyed taghi Heydari ( [email protected] ) Shiraz University of Medical Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7711-1137 Hasan Giahi Shiraz University Ali Dehshahri Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Mehdi Dianatpour Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Kamran Bagheri Lankarani Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Research Keywords: Tamoxifen, breast cancer, genetic variants, RNA-seq. Posted Date: August 17th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-783422/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/33 Abstract Background Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of mortality in the world, and Tamoxifen therapy is known as a medication strategy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. In current study, two hypotheses of Tamoxifen consumption in breast cancer cell line (MCF7) were investigated. First, the effect of Tamoxifen on genes expression prole at transcriptome level was evaluated between the control and treated samples. Second, due to the fact that Tamoxifen is known as a mutagenic factor, there may be an association between the alterations of genetic variants and Tamoxifen treatment, which can impact on the drug response. Methods In current study, the whole-transcriptome (RNA-seq) dataset of four investigations (19 samples) were derived from European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI). At transcriptome level, the effect of Tamoxifen was investigated on gene expression prole between control and treatment samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Cacybp (NM 009786) Mouse Tagged ORF Clone Product Data
    OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for MR202748 Cacybp (NM_009786) Mouse Tagged ORF Clone Product data: Product Type: Expression Plasmids Product Name: Cacybp (NM_009786) Mouse Tagged ORF Clone Tag: Myc-DDK Symbol: Cacybp Synonyms: SIP Vector: pCMV6-Entry (PS100001) E. coli Selection: Kanamycin (25 ug/mL) Cell Selection: Neomycin ORF Nucleotide >MR202748 ORF sequence Sequence: Red=Cloning site Blue=ORF Green=Tags(s) TTTTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGGCCGGGAATTCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGAGGAGATCTGCC GCCGCGATCGCC ATGGCTTCCGTTTTGGAAGAGTTGCAGAAAGACCTAGAAGAGGTCAAAGTATTGCTGGAAAAGTCCACTA GGAAAAGACTACGTGATACTCTTACAAGTGAAAAGTCCAAGATTGAGACGGAACTCAAGAACAAGATGCA ACAGAAGTCGCAGAAGAAACCAGAACTTGATAATGAAAAGCCAGCTGCTGTGGTTGCTCCTCTTACAACA GGATACACCGTGAAAATCAGTAATTATGGATGGGATCAGTCAGATAAGTTTGTGAAAATCTACATTACCT TGACTGGCGTCCATCAGGTGCCCACTGAGAACGTGCAGGTGCACTTCACAGAGAGGTCATTTGATCTTCT GGTAAAAAACCTCAATGGCAAGAATTACTCCATGATTGTGAACAATCTTTTGAAACCTATCTCTGTGGAA AGCAGTTCAAAAAAAGTCAAGACTGATACAGTAATTATTCTATGTAGAAAGAAAGCAGAAAACACAAGAT GGGACTACTTAACACAGGTGGAAAAGGAATGCAAAGAGAAAGAAAAGCCTTCCTACGACACGGAGGCAGA CCCTAGTGAGGGATTAATGAATGTTCTAAAGAAAATTTATGAAGACGGAGACGATGATATGAAGCGAACC ATTAATAAAGCGTGGGTGGAATCCAGAGAGAAGCAAGCCAGAGAAGACACGGAATTT ACGCGTACGCGGCCGCTCGAGCAGAAACTCATCTCAGAAGAGGATCTGGCAGCAAATGATATCCTGGATT ACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGTTTAA This product is to be used for laboratory only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use. View online
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw Breakage Syndrome DDX11 Helicase Acts Jointly with RAD17 in the Repair of Bulky Lesions and Replication Through Abasic Sites
    Warsaw breakage syndrome DDX11 helicase acts jointly with RAD17 in the repair of bulky lesions and replication through abasic sites Takuya Abea,b,1, Masato Ookaa,b,1, Ryotaro Kawasumia, Keiji Miyatab, Minoru Takatac, Kouji Hirotab, and Dana Branzeia,d,2 aDNA Repair lab, IFOM, Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy; bDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji-shi, 192-0397 Tokyo, Japan; cLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan; and dIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 27100 Pavia, Italy Edited by Philip C. Hanawalt, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved June 28, 2018 (received for review February 21, 2018) Warsaw breakage syndrome, a developmental disorder caused by genes result in impaired ability of cells to deal with certain mutations in the DDX11/ChlR1 helicase, shows cellular features of forms of DNA damage, such as endogenous formaldehyde (9), genome instability similar to Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we report and lead to a hereditary disorder, FA, characterized by bone that DDX11-deficient avian DT40 cells exhibit interstrand crosslink marrow failure, developmental abnormalities, and predisposition (ICL)-induced chromatid breakage, with DDX11 functioning as to cancer. backup for the FA pathway in regard to ICL repair. Importantly, The central components of the FA pathway, FANCD2 and we establish that DDX11 acts jointly with the 9-1-1 checkpoint FANCI, interact with each other (10), and are monoubiquitylated – clamp and its loader, RAD17, primarily in a postreplicative fashion, by the FA core complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Genetics Mutations in Genes AMELX, ENAM, MMP20 and FAM83H in Inducate Amelogenesis Imperfecta Syndrome Shahin Asadi*
    Haematology Open Access Open Journal Review Assessment Genetics Mutations in Genes AMELX, ENAM, MMP20 and FAM83H in Inducate Amelogenesis Imperfecta Syndrome Shahin Asadi* Director of the Division of Medical Genetics and Molecular Research, Molecular Medicine, Genetics Harvard University, USA *Correspondence to: Shahin Asadi; Director of the Division of Medical Genetics and Molecular Research, Molecular Medicine, Genetics Harvard University, USA; E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 28th, 2019; Revised: March 29th, 2019; Accepted: March 29th, 2019; Published: March 30th, 2019 Citation: Carlos TJ, Ignacio HD, Xavier SI, Ariel LE. Assessment genetics mutations in genes AMELX,ENAM, MMP20 and FAM83H in inducate amelogenesis imperfecta syndrome. Haemat Open A Open J. 2019; I(1): 5-8. ABSTRACT Defective amelogenesis syndrome is a genetic disorder in the development of teeth. The researchers described at least 14 types of incomplete amelogenesis disorders. Mutations in the AMELX, ENAM, MMP20, and FAM83H genes can cause malformation of the amelogenesis syndrome. Keywords: Amelogenesis syndrome, AMELX, ENAM, MMP20, FAM83H genes, Teeth disorders.. GENERALIZATIONS OF INCOMPLETE AMELOGENESIS cific dental disorders and hereditary patterns. Additionally, incomplete SYNDROME amelogenesis syndrome can occur alone without any other symptoms or symptoms, or it can occur as part of a syndrome that affects different Defective amelogenesis syndrome is a genetic disorder in the develop- parts of the body.2 ment of teeth. This condition causes the teeth to be abnormally small, colored, pitted or perforated, and are prone to wear and breakage. Other Figure 2. Another view of dental disorders in amelogenesis syndrome dental disorders may also occur in incomplete amelogenesis syndrome. These defects, which vary among people affected, can affect the teeth (the child) and permanent teeth (adults).1 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Data
    SUPPLEMENTARY DATA A cyclin D1-dependent transcriptional program predicts clinical outcome in mantle cell lymphoma Santiago Demajo et al. 1 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX Supplementary Methods p. 3 Supplementary References p. 8 Supplementary Tables (S1 to S5) p. 9 Supplementary Figures (S1 to S15) p. 17 2 SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and qRT-PCR Western blot (WB) analysis was performed as previously described (1), using cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-753, RRID:AB_2070433) and tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, T5168, RRID:AB_477579) antibodies. Co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed as described before (2), using cyclin D1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8396, RRID:AB_627344) or control IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-2025, RRID:AB_737182) followed by protein G- magnetic beads (Invitrogen) incubation and elution with Glycine 100mM pH=2.5. Co-IP experiments were performed within five weeks after cell thawing. Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-753), E2F4 (Bethyl, A302-134A, RRID:AB_1720353), FOXM1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-502, RRID:AB_631523), and CBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-7300, RRID:AB_626817) antibodies were used for WB detection. In figure 1A and supplementary figure S2A, the same blot was probed with cyclin D1 and tubulin antibodies by cutting the membrane. In figure 2H, cyclin D1 and CBP blots correspond to the same membrane while E2F4 and FOXM1 blots correspond to an independent membrane. Image acquisition was performed with ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini (GE Healthcare). Image processing and quantification were performed with Multi Gauge software (Fujifilm). For qRT-PCR analysis, cDNA was generated from 1 µg RNA with qScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Quantabio). qRT–PCR reaction was performed using SYBR green (Roche).
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Protein Coding Genes Identifies Information
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/679456; this version posted June 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Animal complexity and information flow 1 1 2 3 4 5 Variation in protein coding genes identifies information flow as a contributor to 6 animal complexity 7 8 Jack Dean, Daniela Lopes Cardoso and Colin Sharpe* 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 25 School of Biological Science 26 University of Portsmouth, 27 Portsmouth, UK 28 PO16 7YH 29 30 * Author for correspondence 31 [email protected] 32 33 Orcid numbers: 34 DLC: 0000-0003-2683-1745 35 CS: 0000-0002-5022-0840 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Abstract bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/679456; this version posted June 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Animal complexity and information flow 2 1 Across the metazoans there is a trend towards greater organismal complexity. How 2 complexity is generated, however, is uncertain. Since C.elegans and humans have 3 approximately the same number of genes, the explanation will depend on how genes are 4 used, rather than their absolute number.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Genes by Phylocsf Supplemental
    Supplemental Materials for Discovery of high-confidence human protein-coding genes and exons by whole-genome PhyloCSF helps elucidate 118 GWAS loci Supplemental Methods ....................................................................................................................... 2 Supplemental annotation methods ........................................................................................................... 2 Manual annotation overview ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary diagram for the workflow used in this study ................................................................................. 3 Transcriptomics analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Comparative annotation ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Overlap of novel annotations with transposon sequences ........................................................................... 6 Assessing the novelty of annotations ...................................................................................................................... 7 Additional considerations for the annotation of PCCRs in other species ............................................... 7 PhyloCSF and browser tracks ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]