Autogas Vs Avgas Vapor (Bubbles) to Form in the Fuel Lines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autogas Vs Avgas Vapor (Bubbles) to Form in the Fuel Lines SYSTEMS TECH heat from its surroundings than does a less volatile fuel and tends to allow Autogas vs Avgas vapor (bubbles) to form in the fuel lines. We extended our questions and Bubbles in the fuel delivery system, investigation to virtually everyone involved prior to reaching the point of atomization in the carburetor, cause an in the process. Consider it all before interruption or reduction in fuel flow deciding if it’s for you. (vapor lock) and complete or partial by Mike Berry testing the fuel for alcohol or other engine failure due to improper fuel-air problem agents or contaminants. mixture. Reid vapor pressure is a here are many questions on the safe The promised benefits from using measure of fuel volatility and is closely use of autogas as a substitute for autogas are increased economy in terms monitored and controlled within an Tavgas. Our goal is to present the of the price of the fuel and a reduction acceptable range for use in aircraft. facts from a broad array of industry of wear of certain engine and airframe people, not just the engine manu- parts such as spark plugs and exhaust Achtung, Octane system components. facturers. Octane ratings for aviation gasoline This includes fuel system engineers, have been rated differently than au- autogas manufacturers, the EAA, engine Chemistry tomotive gasoline in that actual fuels makers, major autogas STC holders, and The formulation for aviation gasoline are tested in aviation engines. They are the like. We thank all the companies and continues to be relatively unchanged for rated according to an antiknock value individuals for their cooperation and the past 50 years. or “performance number” based on assis tance. It must satisfy these basic require- octane values lower than 100-octane or Petersen Aviation was especially ments: 1) Vaporization must occur performance-rated for fuel rated at 100- helpful to us. This company represents easily at low temperatures but yet not so octane or higher. the lion’s share of the autogas STCs, easy that it will cause vapor lock; 2) It The term 80/87 describes the ob- with over 30,000 in the field sold by must have a high energy content per served actual performances (resis tance them. unit weight (BTU), and permit high to detonation) when the engine is If you decide to use autogas, LPM compression engine operation without operated with a lean condition (80- can help you understand the require- detonation; 3) It must be relatively free octane) and then rich condition (87- ments in accordance with the STC. With of gum-forming compounds; 4) It must octane). more than 50,000 total STCs issued for have a low sulfur content to reduce Automotive fuels are not rated in the use of autogas in low-compression corrosive action; 5) It must be stored this way but use an “antiknock index” piston engine aircraft, it would hardly and delivered free of contaminants. and an average of the research octane seem that there is a Volatility considerations are im- method, and motor method. problem with the use of autogas in portant because of the effect on The antiknock index posted on aircraft. carburetor icing and “vapor lock.” Va- autogas pumps is approximately five That statement is based on users porization of fuel in the carburetor points higher than the actual octane closely following the STC, including venturi cannot take place without heat rating of aviation fuel—thus an an- Airplanes that have been approved for being extracted (latent heat of tiknock index of 87 posted on an use with autogas run the gamut. Being vaporization). If too much heat is taken autogas pump would equate to about an able to burn autogas is a real boon to out during the vaporization process “average” 82-octane aviation fuel. such high fuel usage engines. ft also there is danger of carburetor ice forming enables operation where avgas may Autogas STCs for 80-octane aviation not be readily available. Petersen with float-type carburetors. engines require a minimum of 87- photo. Highly volatile fuel extracts more antiknock index. Leaded aviation fuels use tetraethyl lead in small quantities, primarily to improve antiknock qualities, and is a necessary additive to aviation fuel to produce 100-octane or greater fuel. Lead is also used to provide lubrication of upper cylinder components such as valves, pistons, cylinder walls and valve guides. Currently, 100-octane 100LL) av- Of the several gas contains about 2 grams of lead per gallon lead substitutes and 80/87-octane contains 0.5 grams per sold in gallon. automotive supply stores that Additives have been tested, One problem with lead mixed with avgas is none have proven that lead requires the addition of a bromine to be beneficial for aviation compound to scavenge lead residue from the engines. engine. Automotive The burning of the lead with the bromine additives that compound produces lead bromide that is claim to remove carried out with the exhaust gasses; however, a water from fuel small amount remains within the engine. This (“dry gas”) lead bromide, when mixed with water, metals, should not be used, as often these are and lubrication oil, produces a corrosive liquid Autofuel testing and certification is not just alcohol and are not to be used in limited to the U.S. Here aJU-52is very damaging to engine components. aviation fuel systems. It cannot be being prepped for fuel testing in Significant water is produced as fuel is stressed enough to use only additives Switzerland under a Petersen license. burned. The presence of water and the proven and tested for use in aircraft. Petersen photo. corrosive properties of the lead bromide are The most unwanted impurity in autogas, this seems to be founded always lurking to damage an engine. gasoline (auto or aviation) is water. The partially on facts from problems ex- This lead bromide by-product is just one of transfer of fuel from cans, external fuel perienced several years ago. the reasons why aviation lubricating oil is tanks, or other non-aviation transfer Power plant and airframe manu- different from automotive lubricating oil. (Note systems introduces the possibility of facturers continue to not be in favor of aviation lubricating oil, according to engine water mixed into the fuel. the use of autogas in their products as makers’ specs, should always be used in Care must be taken to ensure that a well. aircraft engines regardless of the type of fuel filter system or other water removal With continued testing and used.) device is used. One such device is a monitoring of operations using autogas, Engines that are operated infrequently are fuel-water separator funnel available a wider experience level is being prime candidates for damaging corrosion from from Aircraft Spruce under part number established and autogas problems this corrosive mixture o f water and lead bro- F3C or F8C that allows the user to see generally have not been as significant mide. The corrosive effects of lead bromide water or other contaminants that are in now as in the past. can be reduced by regular flying, frequent oil the fuel filter/funnel. They’re important The major complaints of years past changes according to manufacturers’ specs, and when fueling with cans directly into an from mechanics was that upper preservation of engines not operated frequently aircraft fuel tank. (at least once a month). Aircraft fuel filters are limited in Additional additives to avgas are capability, and can remove only a small It’s imperative to check carburetor compounds such as dye, for identification amount of water or contamination in the filter screens regularly for any signs of purposes and aromatics such as benzol to resist fuel before allowing water to pass contamination of any sort to keep the knocking. Toluene is added to make for low directly into the fuel delivery system. dean side of the airplane up. freezing point, good volatility, and rubber Operators with Marvel Schebler float-type carburetors should at least solvent properties less damaging than benzol. annually drain the float bowl and check In addition to these compounds there are other for contaminants. Check the finger compounds blended in small amounts with screens for contamination whether avgas for reducing gum residue. autogas or avgas has been used. Water introduced into aircraft fuel injection Fuel Purity systems is extremely damaging and The requirement for purity in aviation fuel is a expensive, as damaging rust can given; gasoline must be free from all impurities develop in a matter of days. such as water, dirt, or other fuels and additives. Additives not certified for aircraft use should Old Issues not be added to fuels as their performance numbers may be adversely affected, and these While many mechanics and repair possible reductions of antiknock properties shops do not recommend the use of have not been tested or approved for aircraft. cylinder wear problems were the Fe-suit by the STC process. No matter where you buy a~ it is of the use of unleaded autogas. This Primarily it’s the liability issue, as the same quality, and consistency no really depends on the status of the autogas was not tested during the matter who sells ii “makes it.” That cylinders. original FAA certification and approval cannot be said autogas. With high Older engines that had not seen an process for engines and airframes. autogas volume. the distribution and overhaul in years had old parts, which Additional problems cited by every supply system is very different and were more vulnerable to unleaded fuel. manufacturer are: 1) Quality control could not n the same quality With new, hardened, valve system verification of autogas is not the same as verification that avgas is subjected components designed for 100-octane avgas.
Recommended publications
  • Motor Gasolines Technical Review Motor Gasolines Technical Review Chevron Products Company
    fold Motor Gasolines Technical Review Motor Gasolines Technical Review Technical Gasolines Motor Chevron Products Company Products Chevron Chevron Products Company 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road San Ramon, CA 94583 www.chevron.com/products/ourfuels/prodserv/fuels/ technical_safety_bulletins/ Chevron Products Company is a division of a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. © 2009 Chevron Corporation. All rights reserved. Chevron is a trademark of Chevron Corporation. Recycled/RecyclableRecycled/recyclable paper paper 10M IDC 69083 06/09 MS-9889 (06-09) center The products and processes referred to in this document are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of their respective companies or markholders. Motor Gasolines Technical Review Written, edited, and designed by employees and contractors of Chevron Corporation: Lew Gibbs, Bob Anderson, Kevin Barnes, Greg Engeler, John Freel, Jerry Horn, Mike Ingham, David Kohler, David Lesnini, Rory MacArthur, Mieke Mortier, Dick Peyla, Brian Taniguchi, Andrea Tiedemann, Steve Welstand, David Bernhardt, Karilyn Collini, Andrea Farr, Jacqueline Jones, John Lind, and Claire Tom. Chapter 5 prepared by Jack Benson of AFE Consulting Services. Motor Gasolines Technical Review (FTR-1) © 2009 Chevron Corporation. All rights reserved. center The products and processes referred to in this document are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of their respective companies or markholders. Motor Gasolines Technical Review Written, edited, and designed by employees and contractors of Chevron Corporation: Lew Gibbs, Bob Anderson, Kevin Barnes, Greg Engeler, John Freel, Jerry Horn, Mike Ingham, David Kohler, David Lesnini, Rory MacArthur, Mieke Mortier, Dick Peyla, Brian Taniguchi, Andrea Tiedemann, Steve Welstand, David Bernhardt, Karilyn Collini, Andrea Farr, Jacqueline Jones, John Lind, and Claire Tom.
    [Show full text]
  • I Got the Gasohol/Winter Gas Blues the Root of the Problem
    The Newsletter for the Superformance Owners Group April 12, 2015 Volume 9 Number 1 I Got the Gasohol/Winter Gas Blues Gasohol – A Pain in the Gas ethanol boils at a temperature lower than the operating Gasoline is a blend of more than 200 different hydrocarbon temperature of most engines. liquids. Prior to the mid-1980’s, gasoline was blended to work And as any moonshiner can tell you, ethanol boils out of the in carbureted cars. From the mid-1980’s on, fuel injection liquid it is mixed with at the boiling point of ethanol, not the replaced carburetors and the fuel blends changed accordingly. boiling point of the mixture. The problem is that if the gasohol The primary difference is that carburetors meter fuel at gets hot enough, the ethanol will boil and will either flood atmospheric pressure and fuel injection meters fuel at high your carburetor or cause vapor lock in your fuel pump, or pressure. The high pressure allows the use of a higher both. percentage of volatile elements in the blend. Today the proper functioning of gasoline in carbureted cars is no longer included in the gasoline testing standards. That is why those of us with carbureted cars are experiencing increasing difficulties. The biggest change affecting carbureted cars is the increasing use of ethanol as well as the other volatile elements used in winter gas. Until recently I never had gasohol/winter gas problems. In the past couple of years, I have had quite a few. The percentage of ethanol in gasohol around my home has been steadily increasing over the years and has reached a point where it is a serious problem for cars with carburetors.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol for Motor Fuels Fact Sheet No
    Alcohol for Motor Fuels Fact Sheet No. 5.010 Farm and Ranch Series|Equipment by J.L. Smith and J.P. Workman* Revised by A. Drenth and P. Cabot** Quick Facts Alcohol has been used as a fuel for increase the engine compression ratio. internal combustion engines since their Increases in compression ratio increase • Alcohols burn more invention. Reports on the use of alcohol as the efficiency of converting the potential completely then petroleum- a motor fuel were published in 1907 and combustion energy to power. Finally, alcohols based fuels, thus increasing detailed research was conducted in the 1920s burn more completely, thus increasing combustion efficiency. and 1930s. Historically, the level of interest combustion efficiency. • Advantages of mixing alcohol in using alcohol as a motor fuel has followed cycles of petroleum-based fuel shortages with gasoline are that alcohol and/or low feed-grain prices. More recently, Disadvantages of Alcohol tends to increase the octane the use of alcohol and other renewable fuels There are many disadvantages to using rating and reduce carbon has been driven by governmental mandates alcohols, particularly methyl and ethyl monoxide and other tailpipe to reduce engine emissions and increase alcohol. Although these alcohols, when used emissions. renewable fuel use. Ethyl alcohol (ethanol) near their stoichiometric air-fuel ratios, • There are many is the primary domestically produced produce more power, a larger quantity of renewable fuel in the U.S. today. Currently, fuel is required to produce a specified power disadvantages to using most U.S. ethanol production is from output. For example, in an automobile, more alcohols, particularly methyl corn, where the starch in the corn kernel fuel is required for each mile driven.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Fuels Technical Review
    Aviation Fuels Technical Review | Chevron Products Aviation Fuels Company Technical Review Chevron Products Company 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road San Ramon, CA 94583 Chevron Products Company is a division of a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. http://www.chevron.com/productsservices/aviation/ © 2007 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. Chevron and the Caltex, Chevron and Texaco hallmarks are federally registered trademarks of Chevron Intellectual Property LLC. Recycled/RecyclableRecycled/recyclable paper paper IDC 1114-099612 MS-9891 (11/14) Table of Contents Notes General Introduction ............................................................i 8 • Aviation Gasoline Performance ............................ 45 Performance Properties 1 • Aviation Turbine Fuel Introduction ........................... 1 Cleanliness Types of Fuel Safety Properties Fuel Consumption 9 • Aviation Gasoline 2 • Aviation Turbine Fuel Performance .........................3 Specifications and Test Methods .......................... 54 Performance Properties Specifications Cleanliness Future Fuels Safety Properties Test Methods Emissions 10 • Aviation Gasoline Composition ............................. 63 3 • Aviation Turbine Fuel Composition Specifications and Test Method ...............................14 Property/Composition Relationships Specifications Additives Test Methods 11 • Aviation Gasoline Refining ..................................... 66 4 • Aviation Turbine Fuel Composition ........................24 Alkylation Base Fuel Avgas Blending
    [Show full text]
  • Avgas Vs. Mogas in Light-Sport Aircraft
    EXPERIMENTER TECHNICALLY SPEAKING PART 1 AVGAS VS. MOGAS IN LIGHT-SPORT AIRCRAFT Upsides and downsides BY CAROL AND BRIAN CARPENTER ONE OF THE MOST requested topics for us to weigh in on is avgas (avi- ation fuel) versus mogas (automotive fuel) in light-sport aircraft. It is important to identify This is also one of the more controversial subjects that makes it very difficult to write an article that is definitive on the subject. the downsides of each type We often get questions like, “What type of fuel should I be using in my light-sport aircraft?” This is akin to the question, “Do these of fuel in order to make pants make me look fat?” Your first instinct should be to change the subject as quickly as possible. God forbid you do elect to engage, you a judgment about how it need to recognize that the conversation is going to morph into many other unrelated topics, and nothing you say is going to be an accept- will impact your airframe able answer. and engine under these Several years ago, we did a two-hour presentation on the subject for the RV-12 fly-in in Bend, Oregon. The first hour of the presenta- operating conditions. tion was all the reasons that you shouldn’t use avgas in your Rotax engine, and the second hour of the presentation was all the reasons that you shouldn’t use mogas in your Rotax engine. Well, that wasn’t type of fuel. So, in reality, it is a matter of very helpful, was it? But that was the point.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Gasoline IV” Is the 2009 Edition of the Ongoing Series of “Changes in Gasoline” Manuals
    SAVE! Important Changes in Reference Material GASOLINE IV The Auto Technician’s Guide to Spark Ignition Engine Fuel Quality Fuel Specifications and How They Affect Vehicle Performance Changes in Fuels Due to Contains the latest Government Completely updated for 2009. quality issues Regulations informationand on gasolineE85! New Information on E85 and Flex-Fuel Vehicles “Changes in Gasoline IV” is the 2009 edition of the ongoing series of “Changes in Gasoline” manuals. The first manual, “Changes in Gasoline & the Automobile Service Technician,” was originally published in 1987. Since that time the multiple editions of the manual have collectively exceeded a circulation of 500,000 copies. The numerous editions of the manual have been necessary due to changes in federal regulations, fuel specifications, and advances in automotive technology. For instance, “Changes in Gasoline” was written shortly after the elimination of lead from gasoline, while “Changes in Gasoline II” was written after passage of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Most of the requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments were implemented by 1995, resulting in the publication of “Changes in Gasoline III.” In 2005, the federal government passed the 2005 Energy Policy Act (EPACT05). This legislation did away with requirements that reformulated gasolines contain oxygen. It also included a requirement that an increasing amount of our transportation fuel be from renewable sources such as ethanol. In 2007 the federal government passed the Energy Independence and Security Act, further increasing the renewable fuels requirement. As such, the transportation fuel landscape is poised for another series of changes. There are, of course, other important developments with transportation fuels, most notably, fluctuating prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Fuels for General Aviation Aircr·Aft with Spark Ignition Engir1es
    DOT/FAA/CT88/05 Alternate Fuels for General FAA Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport Aviation Aircr·aft with Spark N.J. 08405 Ignition Engir1es Augusto M. Ferrara MLI2Aidl .····-·­ __ ....... June 1988 Final Report This document is available to tl1e U.S. public through the National Technical Information 1 Service, Springfield, Virginia 2:~161. US. Department of Troosportation Federal AMatlon Adn*llsliallon NOTICE This document is dieseainated under the aponsorahip of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchanae. The United Statea Government assumes no liability for the content• or use thereof. The United Statea Government does not endorae products or manufacturers. Trade or ..nufacturer's n... s appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. T echn i ca I Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/CT-88/05 4. Title and Subtitle ' 5. Report Date June 1988 ALTERNATE FUELS FOR GENERAL AVIATION 6. Performing Organi zat1on Code AIRCRAFT WITH SPARK IGNITION ENGINES ACT-320 8. Performing Organization Report No. ~7~.-A-u-th~o-rl~s~)--------------------------------------------------~l Augusto M. Ferrara DOT/FAA/CT-88/05 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) I ! Federal Aviation Administration 11. Contract or Grant No. Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey 0Ei405 13. Type of Report and Period Covered ~--------------~~----------------------~12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Final Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey 081_+0_5__ -L------------------------------1 1 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft (2021)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/26050 SHARE Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft (2021) DETAILS 0 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-25680-3 | DOI 10.17226/26050 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Policy Studies; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2021. Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26050. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft Transportation Research Board Special Report 336 Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft Committee on Lead Emissions from Piston-Powered General Aviation Aircraft A Consensus Study Report of PREPUBLICATION COPY – Uncorrected Proofs Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft Transportation Research Board Special Report 336 Subscriber Categories Aviation; policy Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering individual publications directly from the TRB Business Office, through the Internet at www.TRB.org or nationalacademies.org/trb, or by annual subscription through organizational or individual affiliation with TRB.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Gasolines and Future Alternatives
    NASA Conference Publication 2267 c.1 i Aviation Gasolines and Future Alternatives Proceedings of a workshop held at Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio February 325, 1981 N”s/\.a,: A f 25th Anniversary ‘f d 1958-1983 I! 1) 1/, - .- . ., TECH f.fBfW?Y KAFB, NM 1 llll~lllllllllllmn~llllln~l,’ 00992lJ4 NASA Conference Pzddicatton zm / Aviation Gasolines and Future Alternatives Donald J. Patterson, Editor University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Proceedings of a workshop held at Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio February 3-5, 1981 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1983 CONTENTS Page PREFACE . 1 WORKSHOPSUMMARY John W. Olcott, Chairman of the Workshop and Editor of Business and Commercial Aviation Magazine . 3 SESSION 1 - GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY NEEDS AND DIRECTIONS Stanley Green, General Aviation Manufacturers Association, Chairman Thomas Smith, Mooney Aircraft, Co-Chairman FAA CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTSFOR FUTURE FUELS, FUEL SYSTEMS, AND POWERPLANTS Thomas C. Horeff, Federal Aviation Administration . 7 AVIATION ENERGY AND THE FUTURE OF THE RECREATIONAL USE OF SPORT AND GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT Paul Poberezny and Harry Zeisloft, Experimental Aircraft Association . 9 INDUSTRY'S ASSESSMENTOF THE NUMBER OF AIRPLANES IN THE GENERAL AVIATION FLEET, ALONG WITH THEIR HOURS FLOWN AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA, POWEREDBY WHAT TYPE OF ENGINES, WHEN AND FOR WHAT REASONS, THROUGHTHE YEAR 2000 Thomas J. Smith, Mooney Aircraft . 15 PANEL DISCUSSION: MULTI-FUEL CAPABILITY FOR GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT MODERATOR: Thomas Smith, Mooney Aircraft . 33 PANELISTS: Edward Beisser Phillips Petroleum David Ellis Cessna Aircraft Cesar Gonzalez Cessna Aircraft Al Hundere Alcor Allen Light AVCO Lycoming Robert Mount Curtiss-Wright Paul Poberezny EAA Joseph Rowe General Electric Joseph Schubeck Stage II Development Les Waters Teledyne Continental LIGHTWEIGHT AIRCRAFT ENGINES, THE POTENTIAL AND PROBLEMSFOR USE OF AUTOMOTIVE FUELS Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Methanol: Properties and Uses
    METHANOL: PROPERTIES AND USES Issued: March 2020 Author: SGS INSPIRE team METHANOL: PROPERTIES AND USES Issued: March 2020 Author: SGS INSPIRE team TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _ 3 2 INTRODUCTION _ 5 2.1 STANDARDS _ 5 3 PROPERTIES WHICH ARE IMPORTANT TO METHANOL7 _ 9 3.1 BENEFITS _ 9 3.2 SHORTCOMINGS _ 10 3.3 PROPERTIES OF METHANOL AS A FUEL FOR SPARK-IGNITION (SI) ENGINES _ 10 3.4 PROPERTIES OF METHANOL AS A FUEL FOR COMPRESSION-IGNITION (CI) ENGINES _ 11 3.4.1. SGS SAMPLES AND TESTS PERFORMED ON METHANOL BLENDS _ 11 3.5 METAL CORROSION _ 12 3.5.1 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY _ 13 3.5.1.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 13 3.5.2 OXIDATION STABILITY _ 14 3.5.3 EXISTENT GUM _ 14 3.5.3.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 14 3.5.4 TOTAL ACID NUMBER (ACIDITY) _ 15 3.6 COPPER CORROSION _ 16 3.6.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 16 3.7 SILVER CORROSION _ 16 3.8 STEEL CORROSION _ 17 3.9 NON-METALS _ 18 3.9.1 PEROXIDE CONTENT _ 19 3.9.1.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 19 3.10 DENSITY (15 °C) _ 20 7 Methanol as a fuel for spark ignition engines: 3.10.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 21 a review and analysis Learn more 3.11 DISTILLATION _ 22 – 1 METHANOL: PROPERTIES AND USES Issued: March 2020 Author: SGS INSPIRE team TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.11.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 24 3.12 VAPOR LOCK INDEX _ 25 3.13 VAPOR PRESSURE _ 26 3.13.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 27 3.14 RESEARCH OCTANE NUMBER _ 29 3.14.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 29 3.15 COMBUSTION INCLUDING OXYGENATES _ 30 3.16 CALORIFIC VALUE CALCULATED FROM COMBUSTION _ 31 3.16.1 SGS LABORATORY RESULTS _ 32 3.17 AIR FUEL RATIO CALCULATED
    [Show full text]