Economic Growth and Income Inequality: Theoretical Background and Empirical Evidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Growth and Income Inequality: Theoretical Background and Empirical Evidence No. 119 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE Cesar Gallo 2002 Working Paper No. 119 ISSN 1474­3280 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE Cesar Gallo 2002 Development Planning Unit University College London 9 Endsleigh Gardens London, WC1H 0ED [email protected] 2 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE CONTENTS 1 Introduction 4 2 The Theoretical Background 5 2.2 Inequality 5 2.2.1 Inequality in Income Consumption Or Wealth? 6 2.2.2 Definition of Income 7 2.3 Economic Growth 8 2.3.1 The Lewis’ Model 10 2.4 Income Distribution 12 2.4.1 General Theories of Income Distribution 12 2.4.2 Theories Of Size Income Distribution 14 3 Economic Growth and Income Inequality: The Empirical Evidence 17 3.1 The Kuznets’ Hypothesis 17 3.2 The Debate About The Inverted­U Hypothesis 18 3.3 The Effect on Poverty 19 3.4 The “U­Turn” In Developed Countries 21 3.5 Income Inequality As a Cause Of Economic Growth 22 4 Conclusion 25 References 27 Endnotes 33 3 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE 1. INTRODUCTION All sciences should be aimed at providing the expense of one of the two productive humanity with a better quality of life. The factors, thus yielding economic classical economists were concerned with inefficiency. The concern was mainly with this objective of Economics as a science. the factor distribution of income, as it was According to Adam Smith (1884), no in classical economics. The division of society can be flourishing and happy, of national income between wages and which the far greater part of the members profits tells nothing directly about how are poor and miserable. David Ricardo incomes are distributed among people, placed the distribution of income at the which is usually understood as the centre of his thought when he stated that problem of income distribution. Political Economy should be aimed at The 1990s witnessed the re­ determining the laws that rule the incorporation of income distribution into distribution of income (Bigsten, 1983; the main body of economic analysis, Ferrán, 1997, Atkinson, 1997). Hartwell although economic growth still remained (1972) goes further in arguing that the ultimate objective. According to the “Economics is, in essence, the study of 1998­1999 Inter­American Development poverty” (p. 3). Bank report (IADB, 1998­1999), the However, this primary objective central argument behind this is that high seems to have been lost many times along inequality in income distribution can slow the history of economic thought. For down the pace of the accumulation of much of the last century, the subject of physical and human capital, which are the income distribution has been absent in the main sources of economic growth. Thus, agenda of economic theory and policy the main concern is that a poor income (Atkinson, 1997). Recent history has distribution harms economic growth. If witnessed changes in perception about the common welfare were the ultimate ultimate nature of the economic activity. objective, economists should be During the 1970s, in the developed world, concerned also with the effects of there was a growing concern with the quality of life, and which was manifested in economic growth on income distribution. protests against the consequences of An undesirable economic growth is one economic growth, such as pollution and which increases income inequality and depletion of natural resources. In the widespread poverty leading to social developing world the main concern was tension and political discontent that focused on the relationship between jeopardises the well­being of society. economic growth and income distribution, The elimination of widespread since many countries that had poverty and growing income inequality are experienced growth rates above their two of the main problems of development, historical standards realised that such and should be the principal objectives of growth seemed to have negatively development policy. However, the affected the income distribution, leading to problem of the distribution of income has increased inequality and a failure to relatively received little scientific study. eliminate, even reduce, the level of This paper reviews the theories that have poverty (Todaro, 1994). been developed on the subject and The revival of neoclassical discusses the empirical work on the economics during the 1980s, in a context relationship between economic growth and of a debt crisis that particularly affected income distribution. Section 2 is devoted Latin American countries, once again put to introducing the theoretical background, economic growth at the forefront of the while Section 3 presents a literature debate. It was becoming the ultimate review on what the empirical evidence objective of economic activity, despite the says about the relationship between fact that inequality was increasing and the growth and inequality. Section 4 poverty problem was worsening. summarizes a set of conclusions. According to the neoclassical perspective, any redistribution would be at 4 2. THE THEORETICAL BACKGROUND with social welfare. In this common usage the term embodies some sort of value There are three main concepts involved in judgement about fairness which will differ the debate presented in this paper that according to different ethical viewpoints. must be discussed: inequality, economic Debates on subjects such as the growth, and income distribution. relationship between inequality among Inequality is a multidimensional individuals and social welfare, fairness in concept. The discussion given in this the distribution of wealth, levels of paper refers to one of those dimensions: inequality allowed without being offensive the inequality in the distribution of income. to society, can not avoid some ethical Sub­section 2.2 discusses this concept, arguments. the different approaches to measure Naturally, these arguments are also inequality, and the definition of income. present when regarding the measurement Sub­section 2.3 gives a quick overview of issue. According to Sen (1973) there are the theories of economic growth and their broadly two categories of inequality extensions which helps to understand the measures. On the one hand those which possible connections between economic try to catch the extent of inequality from an growth and income distribution. objective point of view, using statistical However, these connections can measure of relative variation of income, only be seen in the light of the theories of and on the other those that try to measure income distribution. How the total income inequality in terms of some normative generated in a society is distributed notion of social welfare which introduces among its members and what determines the complication of ethical valuations. The such distribution have been questions problem is that there is not a clear line placed at the top of the debate in some drawn delimiting the two approaches. periods in the history of the economic "Even if we take inequality as an objective thought and relegated to the background notion, our interest in its measurement during others. The dominant ideas in a must relate to our normative concern with specific period are linked with those in it, and in judging the relative merits of former periods, even in times when different objective measures of inequality, revolutionary changes have occurred. it would indeed be relevant to introduce Therefore, having knowledge of the main normative considerations. At the same ideas about the distributive problems time, even if we take a normative view of developed in the past contributes to a the measures of income inequality, this is better understanding of the current not necessarily meant to catch the totality theoretical debate on income distribution. of our ethical evaluation" (Sen, 1973, p. 3). This is the subject of Sub­section 2.4. But the problem goes even beyond this point. It has been said earlier that inequality is about comparison. What one 2.2 Inequality would want to compare is the living In any context the concept of inequality standard of each individual in a specific refers always to comparability between society. Unfortunately, no agreement has elements. The comparison is usually been achieved among social scientists based on specific characteristics which about what exactly the standard of living of can be measured using adequate indexes an individual means and how to measure or indicators. Thus, the fact is reduced to it. The controversies arise not only from comparisons between quantities and the different ethical points of view of those inequality will relate to differences in these who want to measure the extent of quantities. In these terms, inequality inequality, but also from the difficulties in seems to be a straightforward concept capturing accurately the person's well­ which, as Cowell (1995) states, being. As reflected by Sen, "obviously" suggests a departure from the simple idea of equality, this is, the fact that You could be well off, without being well. two or more quantities are the same size. You could be well, without being able to However, difficulties arise when the lead the life you wanted. You could have concept is framed into the social context got the life you wanted, without being and in connection with economic happy. You could be happy, without having much freedom. You could have a problems. In this context, the concept is good deal of freedom without achieving generally related to differences in income, much (Sen, 1985, p. 1., quoted by consumption or wealth and associated 5 Goodman, Johnson, and Webb 1997, p. are sometimes used to compensate the 11). weakness of income or consumption based measures in capturing adequately Then, it seems quite unlikely to find many aspects of well­being. Some of out a single index able to provide a full those indicators are life expectancy, infant description of living standard as this mortality, nutrition, the proportion of outlined by Sen.
Recommended publications
  • HLA MYINT 105 Neoclassical Development Analysis: Its Strengths and Limitations 107 Comment Sir Alec Cairn Cross 137 Comment Gustav Ranis 144
    Public Disclosure Authorized pi9neers In Devero ment Public Disclosure Authorized Second Theodore W. Schultz Gottfried Haberler HlaMyint Arnold C. Harberger Ceiso Furtado Public Disclosure Authorized Gerald M. Meier, editor PUBLISHED FOR THE WORLD BANK OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Public Disclosure Authorized Oxford University Press NEW YORK OXFORD LONDON GLASGOW TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON HONG KONG TOKYO KUALA LUMPUR SINGAPORE JAKARTA DELHI BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI NAIROBI DAR ES SALAAM CAPE TOWN © 1987 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Manufactured in the United States of America. First printing January 1987 The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressed herein, which are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organizations. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pioneers in development. Second series. Includes index. 1. Economic development. I. Schultz, Theodore William, 1902­ II. Meier, Gerald M. HD74.P56 1987 338.9 86-23511 ISBN 0-19-520542-1 Contents Preface vii Introduction On Getting Policies Right Gerald M. Meier 3 Pioneers THEODORE W. SCHULTZ 15 Tensions between Economics and Politics in Dealing with Agriculture 17 Comment Nurul Islam 39 GOTTFRIED HABERLER 49 Liberal and Illiberal Development Policy 51 Comment Max Corden 84 Comment Ronald Findlay 92 HLA MYINT 105 Neoclassical Development Analysis: Its Strengths and Limitations 107 Comment Sir Alec Cairn cross 137 Comment Gustav Ranis 144 ARNOLD C.
    [Show full text]
  • Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe
    Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe . »JLL»/ United Nations United Nations Research Institute Economic Commission for for Social Development Latin America Printed by S'*! Hungary, 1981 Statistical Publishing House Contents Acknowledgments ........................................... P reface ............................................................... in CHAPTER ONE: Why Elusive Development? 1 CHAPTER TWO: The Quest for a Unified Approach 11 Background of the unified approach project of UNRISD and ECLA — Methodology and institutional constraints - Differing approaches that emerged and their underlying supposition — The changing international market for propositions on development during and since the unified approach project - The place of the unified approach project in the inter­ national rethinking of development - Lessons for the future and needs for international research. CHAPTER THREE: Development Images, Agents and Choices............................. 55 Images of development - Concepts, values and criteria for styles of develop­ ment — A digression on the practical - Choices aiming at an acceptable and viable style of development. CHAPTER FOUR: Approaches to Development: Who is Approaching what? 75 Development under question: The feasibility of national choice between alternative styles — The setting within which developmental choices present themselves — Policy approaches to the challenge of “unified”, “original”, or “human-oriented” styles of development. CHAPTER FIVE: Social and Political Structures and Development Policy
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mini-Literature Review Student Identity Development Theory
    Mini-Literature review Student Identity Development Theory INTRODUCTION Student development theory is an area of study that tries to identify, describe, explain and predict human behaviors as student’s transition from adolescence to adulthood. Over the past few decades, the study of student development has paid particular focus on identity development of college students. As colleges welcome a more complex and diverse student population, the study (and practice) of college student identity development now considers a more holistic approach. It is a theoretical orientation where political, historical and cultural contexts place socially constructed factors on identity development. Drawing on both foundational scholarship and current research, the purpose of this review is to present the more holistic perspective of identity development currently followed by scholars and researchers in the field to inform a more inclusive learning environment within higher education. One of the more widely used and referenced books on identity development for college students is the 1998 book, Student Development in College. Now in its 2nd edition, the book was one of the first to combine development theories into a series of categories ranging from psychosocial theories, cognitive and moral theories to typological and person-environmental theories. Each theory addressed in the book seeks to answer the following developmental questions (Knefelkamp, Widick, & Parker, 1978 in Evans, Forney, Guido, Renn, and Patton, 2010 p. 24): 1. What interpersonal and intrapersonal changes occur while the student is in college? 2. What factors lead to this development? 3. What aspect of the college environment encourage or retard growth? 4. What development outcomes should we strive to achieve in college? FOUNDATIONAL THEORIES ON STUDENT DEVELOPMENT One of the foundational theories addressed in Student Development in College is Chickering’s Theory of Identity Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Development Theory in the Sociological and Political Analyses of the New States
    POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY IN THE SOCIOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL ANALYSES OF THE NEW STATES by ROBERT HARRY JACKSON B.A., University of British Columbia, 1964 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Political Science We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, I966 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission.for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Polit_i_g^j;_s_gience The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date September, 2, 1966 ii ABSTRACT The emergence since World War II of many new states in Asia and Africa has stimulated a renewed interest of sociology and political science in the non-western social and political process and an enhanced concern with the problem of political development in these areas. The source of contemporary concepts of political development can be located in the ideas of the social philosophers of the nineteenth century. Maine, Toennies, Durkheim, and Weber were the first social observers to deal with the phenomena of social and political development in a rigorously analytical manner and their analyses provided contemporary political development theorists with seminal ideas that led to the identification of the major properties of the developed political condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts of Inequality Development Issues No
    Development Strategy and Policy Analysis Unit w Development Policy and Analysis Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs Concepts of Inequality Development Issues No. 1 21 October 2015 Inequality—the state of not being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities1—is a concept very much at the heart Summary of social justice theories. However, it is prone to confusion in public debate as it tends to mean different things to different The understanding of inequality has evolved from the people. Some distinctions are common though. Many authors traditional outcome-oriented view, whereby income is distinguish “economic inequality”, mostly meaning “income used as a proxy for well-being. The opportunity-oriented inequality”, “monetary inequality” or, more broadly, inequality perspective acknowledges that circumstances of birth are in “living conditions”. Others further distinguish a rights-based, essential to life outcomes and that equality of opportunity legalistic approach to inequality—inequality of rights and asso- requires a fair starting point for all. ciated obligations (e.g. when people are not equal before the law, or when people have unequal political power). Concerning economic inequality, much of the discussion has on poverty reduction. Pro-poor growth approaches made their boiled down to two views. One is chiefly concerned with the debut and growth and equity (through income redistribution) inequality of outcomes in the material dimensions of well-being were seen as separate policy instruments, each capable of address- and that may be the result of circumstances beyond one’s control ing poverty. The central concern was in raising the incomes of (ethnicity, family background, gender, and so on) as well as talent poor households.
    [Show full text]
  • Development, Post-, Anti-, and Populist: a Critical Review
    Environment and Planning A 2000, volume 32, pages 1033 ^ 1050 DOI:10.1068/a3251 Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review Piers Blaikie School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England; e-mail: [email protected] Received 2 April 1999; in revised form 9 September 1999 Abstract. The notion and practice of development have been severely critiqued from both modernist and postmodernist perspectives, yet the global development industry flourishes. The latter have afforded important insights, but also suffer from unexamined ideological agendas, a disinclination to undertake detailed research into development processes and policy, a preoccupation with texts and representations by the development industry, and from perpetuating an indulgent and agenda-less academic cul-de-sac. Instead, the postmodern critique of development could lead to a more politically astute and practical reconstruction of certain aspects of `development', particularly in the neopopulist mode of developmentalism. Three powerful development paradigms are identified, and the ways in which they are constructed, promoted, and adapted are discussed in the light of conflicting modernist and postmodern accounts. Postmodern engagement with development There has been a profound sense of disappointment and reappraisal in the global development project since the 1960s, yet the project continues. This has come about after a long history of modernist critiques, which have judged the results of develop- ment in their own terms (it failed to deliver what it promised), as well as the more recent postmodern turn which social science has taken, which has sought to portray development as a metanarrative ripe for deconstruction, and to interrogate its intellec- tual and epistemological foundations, but, I argue, has led development debate into some confusing and exposed terrains.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Research: an Annotated Bibliography Center for International Education
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Participatory Research & Practice Center for International Education 1991 Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography Center for International Education Peter Park David Kinsey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ cie_participatoryresearchpractice Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons Center for International Education; Park, Peter; and Kinsey, David, "Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography" (1991). Participatory Research & Practice. 5. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cie_participatoryresearchpractice/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Education at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Participatory Research & Practice by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography By Center for Community Education & Action & t"------~-- C enter for International Education 1991 Cover and inside graphics by Mansour Fakih Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Center for Community Education and Action, Inc. Northampton, MA Center for International Education University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 1991 This bibliography has been printed with the assistance of the University Store's Textbook Annex at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Copyright 1991 by the Center for Community Education & Action, Inc., Northampton, MA and the Center for International Education, Amherst, MA. Acknowledgements This bibliography is an attempt to bring together references on participatory research for the purpose of sharing them with interested practitioners and scholars. It began as a project of the Center for Community Education and Action, Inc. (CCEA) to annotate and disseminate its resource materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Trade, Capital, and Development: Substitutes, Complements, and Policies
    Migration, Trade, Capital, and Development: Substitutes, Complements, and Policies Gustav.Ranis he postwar era is not the first experience the world has had with globalization in all its dimensions. The current episode can, however, Tbe distinguished from its nineteenth century predecessor by its scale—a world of six billion inhabitants, massive movements of goods, services, and capital—as well as by continuously falling communication and transport costs and the instantaneous nature of information flows and stakeholder reaction possibilities. When war and interwar autarky ended in 1945, international trade was first to pick up, followed by a renewal of public capital movements, initially to Europe and subsequently to developing countries. Next came private portfolio capital and foreign direct investment (FDI), quickly dwarfing public capital flows, known as Official Development Assistance (ODA). The economic migration of people, excluding refugees and asylum seek- ers, has lagged substantially behind. That’s largely because barriers to the move- ment of people remain high—despite calls and considerable action for increased freedom of trade, capital, and associated technology mobility. This dimension of globalization tends to cause the strongest political resistance; when domestic workers are seen to be threatened by some combination of technology change, imports, and immigrants, it is invariably the last of these that generates the largest rhetorical and policy response. Nevertheless, pressures for enhanced migration are rising, certainly in the less-developed origin (O) countries but also in some quarters of the more de- veloped destination (D) countries. The very fact that migration has lagged sub- stantially behind the other dimensions of globalization also makes it the largest 285 286 Gustav Ranis opportunity for additional global welfare gains—especially today, when further multilateral trade liberalization is in considerable doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Development Theory
    Student Development Theory Carolyn Farley Michael Walker Why is Student Development Theory Important? Justifies our profession and legitimatizes relevance of Student Affairs Professionals Helps us understand our audience; talk their language Helps us “meet students where they are” Teaches us how students rationalize, behave and develop as human beings Helps us understand opportunities and limits 2 SDT also… Helps us: understand where students are within a human development continuum (where they were and where they are going developmentally); understand how to address the “whole person” complement academics with co-curriculars; account for the development and needs of special populations Provides “description, explanation, prediction, and control” (DiCaprio, 1974, in Forney, Evans & Guido-DiBrito, 1998). Characteristics of Millennials Through their research, Howe and Strauss (2000) found that seven key characteristics define today’s 18-22 year old college students (as well as 23-25 year old graduate students). These traits include: Special - many from smaller families with fewer siblings to compete with, so received greater attention and increased security from mom and dad (known as “helicopter parents” due to their constant hovering around their children). Sheltered - more than previous generations, parents kept them closer to home with a focus on safety and connection to family, but also involved with many organized activities and sports. Confident - increased parental involvement and coaching/external adult involvement gave them lots of support and self-confidence. Student Affairs: Creating Experiences for Life Millennial Characteristics cont. Team-oriented - grew up among most diverse American population ever, and learned to be civil and less “me-oriented” than previous generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth Center
    ECONOMIC GROWTH CENTER YALE UNIVERSITY P.O. Box 208629 New Haven, CT 06520-8269 http://www.econ.yale.edu/~egcenter/ CENTER DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1002 Technology Change: Sources and Impediments Gustav Ranis Yale University Mallory Irons Johns Hopkins University Yanjing Huang Yale University September 2011 Notes: Center discussion papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comments. Technology Change: Sources and Impediments Gustav Ranis, Mallory Irons and Yanjing Huang Abstract There is little doubt that technology change, both in terms of its process and quality dimensions, represents the principal driving force to explain comparative economic performance at both micro and macro levels. This paper examines the sources of technology change and the impediments to the full realization of its opportunities, both abstractly and in the context of a comparison among six typologically diverse developing countries. Among the external sources, we examine the roles of trade, foreign patents and FDI; among the internal sources we examine the roles of investment, domestic R&D, domestic patents, S&T personnel and secondary education alternatives. Among impediments, we analyze certain public and private policy frameworks which tend to impede the realization of technological opportunities. We detect some reasons for the better TFP performance of the East Asian in comparison with the Latin American countries. Keywords: Development, Technological Change JEL Codes: O11, O14, O33 TECHNOLOGY CHANGE: SOURCES AND IMPEDIMENTS* Gustav Ranis, Mallory Irons and Yanjing Huang** I. Introduction The relationship between technology change and economic growth has been of interest to economists for centuries, but especially since Robert Solow made his seminal contribution to the neoclassical model of economic growth in the 1950s leading to an explosion in the follow-up literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Paradigms of Human Resource Development
    EXPLORING PARADIGMS OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation by ANDREW CHRISTOPHER HURT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Major Subject: Educational Human Resource Development EXPLORING PARADIGMS OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation by ANDREW CHRISTOPHER HURT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, Gary N. McLean Susan A. Lynham Committee Members, Toby M. Egan Manda H. Rosser Head of Department, Fredrick M. Nafukho August 2010 Major Subject: Educational Human Resource Development iii ABSTRACT Exploring Paradigms of Human Resource Development. (August 2010) Andrew Christopher Hurt, B.S., Purdue University; M.S., Purdue University Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Gary N. McLean Dr. Susan A. Lynham This study focused on the issue of paradigms in Human Resource Development (HRD). Its purpose was to validate the HRD Cube as a synthesized model of HRD and to explicate some of the extant paradigms of HRD. The study was carried out by examining the text of articles published in Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD)-sponsored journals. Purposeful, stratified, and random sampling was used to select 16 articles published in AHRD-sponsored journals. Articles were treated as if they were the representative voice(s) of their author(s). Data units from within each article were identified and coded using two sequential techniques. First, units were axially coded and sorted into one of seven pre-determined categories based on the axioms of theory, research, and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Economism and Critical Silences in Development Studies
    ThirdWorld Quarterly, Vol 16, No 2, 1995 Economismand critical silencesin developmentstudies: a theoretical critiqueof neoliberalism JOHNBROHMAN Because ofthe recentness of neoliberalism’ s rise inpopularity within develop- mentstudies, it has onlybeen in the last few years thatit has beensubject to closescrutiny in the development literature. Moreover, much of thecriticism of theneoliberal approach has beenfocused on the immediate consequences of structuraladjustment and other neoliberal policy instruments on Third World countries.However, there is alsoa theoreticalcritique that can be applied to neoliberalismwhich can help explain the root causes ofmany of its shortcom- ingsas adevelopmentstrategy. Given the close links between neoliberalism and neoclassicaltheory in general, much of this theoretical criticism concentrates on basicproblems of theneoclassical framework. This paper particularly focuses on theproblem of economism and the consequent neglect of three important areas ofdevelopment studies: sociocultural and political relations, the intersubjective realmof meanings and values in development, and the environment and issues ofsustainability. The narrownessof homo economicus and associated neoclassical assumptions Themultifaceted and dynamic nature of development processes makes it necessary totakean interdisciplinary approach to thestudy of development, one thatincludes sociocultural, political, and environmental factors as wellas those economic.However, neoliberalism and other mainstream development frame- worksthat draw their
    [Show full text]